You guys should do this test again after reading the advice from Shield Your Body. Not waving around the tester and turning over their pouch, to the back where it is actually protected.
Grrr. Please redo this while holding the detector still. Using a product accurately is but one critical factor in any experiment, and people really wanted to know. An actual dedication to learn the truth involves fine-tuning or re-tries to know it was a more accurate test. Thanks for the effort. I need to find a different test review now.
I am the CEO of SYB, and we make the Phone Pouch that you tested in your video. And I wanted to take this opportunity to respond to your test. First, I would like to thank you very much for taking the time to test these products. Given the increasing number of sources of human-made EMF in our environment, I encourage more people to learn how to test for themselves. Now, regarding your test of our Phone Pouch, your measurements are from the front of our Pouch. This, unfortunately, means that your test does not actually test the shielding performance of our Pouch. This is because the front of our Phone Pouch -- the side you tested -- is unshielded. It's the rear of our Pouch that is the shielded side. This is an intentional design element of our Pouches. By shielding the rear of the Pouch, but not the front, our Pouch deflects harmful EMF radiation away from your body when you carry your phone -- without negatively impacting your phone's reception or battery life. So taking measurements off the front of the Pouch would not be an accurate way to measure our product claims. You would need to take measurements from the back of the Pouch, as we do in this testing video: ua-cam.com/video/BQv9igT9vgI/v-deo.html I would really appreciate it if you might consider redoing your test to measure the rear side of our Pouch that provides protection against radiation. I would also note, as other commenters have, that when taking tests such as these, you should not wave around your meter -- that is not a way to get an accurate reading. You can take readings in multiple positions, but you should hold each position for at least a few seconds to get a reliable reading. We cover this, and include several other tips, in the free ebook I wrote explaining how to conduct tests such as these. You can download that ebook, and see other EMF testing resources, here on our website: shieldyourbody.com/test One final note, your meter is designed to detect low frequency (or ELF) magnetic and electric EMF radiation. That is important, but it is also important to measure the radio frequency (RF) and/or microwave (MW) frequency ranges of EMF radiation, which are the frequencies utilized for wireless communication. My ebook recommends a few meters that will do this. And, as one other commenter noted, the TriField is a great option because it includes an ELF-electric, ELF-magnetic and RF meter all in one, for a reasonable price. Thank you once again for performing these tests. I really appreciate it when customers take the time to verify our product claims, and those of our competitors. I also hope that you will consider re-doing your test of our Pouch, by taking measurements off of the rear side of our Pouch, which is the side that provides protective shielding. Sincerely, R Blank CEO Shield Your Body
Hello, I don't see a need to re-do the video because of the back or front of the pouch/case. You can see the winner of the video did not have a front cover and still for some reason, unknown to me, protected very well. I am not a scientist and this is not my field of expertise, so I appreciate your detailed, educational response! But please understand that we are a normal consumer and this is just the result that came from our test with all cases/phone facing the same direction. No bias here.
What's the point in taking measurements from the back of the phone? Radiation is highest when giving and receiving calls, so are people supposed to talk with the back of the phone to their ear?
I can't speak for all the other cases in your test, but I highly suggest that you test the RadiArmor case WITHOUT the phone first. I have the same EMF reader and I discovered that the EMF shielding is so good that it was actually picking up the EMF from the reader itself, not the phone. Please test it for yourself. I later used a more accurate EMF reader and I can confirm that the RadiArmor case does indeed block high frequency RF very effectively.
Beeping as a sign of emf is a very broad and general way of measuring emf and rf. It seems some of these cases semi protect and others protect. When you shake the meter around it makes it very hard for the viewer to determine to what extent these devices work (i.e observe frequency change) which would be valueable info. You have done this diligence so thank you for purchasing and testing these cases. Some people refrain from mentioning company names so it was nice to see a classic product video on emf protectors. Peace guys
Have you had symptoms such as fatigue, headaches, poor memory, difficulty sleeping, and lack of clarity in your thoughts? It may seem like these could be the results of daily stress and frenzy, but there could be another culprit. All of these are symptoms of electro-sensitivity, which is something that more and more people find themselves affected by. Studies conducted in 1997 found "less than a few cases (of electro-sensitivity) per million", however now as much as 2.5% of the population is affected by electro-sensitivity. Even with the most moderate calculations, electrosensitivity is 10,000 times more common today than it was 20 years ago. Why could this be? Electro-sensitivity and its symptoms appear to be triggered by certain microwave frequencies of electromagnetic radiation. Microwaves are frequently used in electronics for the purpose of communication between devices. Due to their high frequency, microwaves allow for higher transmission rates and smaller antenna sizes, which is perfect for high-tech devices that are constantly getting smaller and faster. These are devices such as cell phones, tablets, laptops, and any device that can connect to Wi-Fi, which can now include TVs and refrigerators Furthermore, numerous studies (2011-2017) report an increased risk of brain cancer due to the use of mobile phones Concern for other cancers: breast (male and female), testis, leukemia, thyroid and much more. the current classification of radio frequencies as carcinogenic to humans (Class 2B) should be updated to carcinogenic to humans Many claim that this is not true at all or that there is no evidence just to progress in the construction of radio transmitters! And the 5 g accelerates all of this. One piece of advice I would like to give you is to equip yourself with devices that protect against electromagnetic waves, such as the Aires tech products, produced by AMERICAN AIRES, in my opinion among the best on the market, have received praise and certifications from independent bodies of the remarkable functioning of their products 5g is part of progress, it is right to progress but why not protect yourself? www.airestech.com/category/media/ sites.google.com/view/sources-electrosmog ua-cam.com/video/zdxvfG353VM/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/3u0yXc9sFps/v-deo.html
Below is a video on how to test the RadiArmor case using several common types of EMF readers, including the Meterk that is being used in this video. ua-cam.com/video/ImPr5lAMFZA/v-deo.html You'll notice that testing shielding efficacy can be a little tricky depending on the EMF reader. In this instance, the Meterk is reacting the EMF blocking liner, not what's coming off the phone.
I had a thought… do you think that possibly because the phone had been on that call and maybe warming up, that is possibly why it showed higher readings through each cover that you tried after the first and second one?
I have a meter similar to yours they do NOT read all frequencies that were present during your test, this meter test low frequency range, It does Not do Medium to High freq range that cell phones put out. Also you do Not wave the meter around like in the video Wrong! this test was Not that useful. A trifield Meter can test a Much wider freq. range
The radiation without any protection was 44, but your waving that reader around so no one can see anything- than you quickly move on and the best protector is 44.??? What kinda nonsensical experiment is this?
I use that emf meter in blue it like £15 off amazon and it’s not accurate often does miss reads as a paranormal investigation team worker I use different emf meters as the e11 is inaccurate
Funny how the reading without the cases was the same as with the case on , you for got to mention that 🤫 waving the phone around so we can’t see it doesn’t help , but pausing the vid makes it really clear 🧐
Your review makes me not trust ANY of these.. You scanned the microwave oven to show that the tester did something but no information of readings.. Then on each case same thing, too fast to provide readings. And it would help to get a baseline on the phone before putting into cases.. AND you probably would get a more accurate result if the phone was set to a call while the internet is also running on a active site.. You can do better next time.
I agree, you can always do better! But for the sake of finding out which case was the best bang for your buck. I believe we did have a solid conclusion or at least as solid as can be determined! The tempered glass case performed the best: amzn.to/2LHVEd2
EssentiaList read the CEO’s comment about the pouch case. You want to get a reading on both sides of all the cases as some cases intentionally have no shield on one of the sides so it bounces off the phone, and most importantly HOLD THE EMF READER STILL when performing these tests. Do not wave around, it gives very inaccurate readings!
EssentiaList You guys are so freaking clueless. Your consumers are TELLING you exactly what they want from you but you seem to stuck in your head in a way that is exactly the opposite of what one should do while trying to build an online review business. I just wanted to comment here so I can show this video and the exchange as an example of what not to do in the MBA course on startups that I will be teaching in Spring. Wow!
SafeSleeve I bought two phone covers and an IPad cover for radiation protection a year ago. Cost over $200 for 3 things and all 3 are coming apart. I commented this on their post and now they have blocked me from commenting. And they removed my post. Oh, forgot to add I put photos of damage to the IPad case and one Iphone case. Is this really how we di business? #BuyerBeware #SafeSleeve
Would be nice to see what the reading was properly and accurately without any phone case as the reading without a phone cases was not talked about or held in place so you could see it. For all we know even they case with the lowest reading could have been the same as the phone ringing without the case? Pointless.
First of all there is no pruf that this type of radiation that the phones are exerting is dangerous ,if you doesn't know it visible light is also a type of radiation so the world radiation doesn't mean completely nothing ,that type of radiation is not ionizing which means that it can not damage the structure of your DNA so it can not cause cancer as many claim. Secondly i have acived the same thing with 0.05 dollars worth of aluminium foil ,which means that there is no reason for that pricing. Furthermore if your phone is inded realy shielded the wifi and every kind of communication that it allows will be gone so is practicly usles for some applications.
Mmm why I am wrong though ,I am interesting to hear your opinion and point of view on the topic and also your explanation on why self phones can cause you harm.
You guys should do this test again after reading the advice from Shield Your Body. Not waving around the tester and turning over their pouch, to the back where it is actually protected.
Grrr. Please redo this while holding the detector still. Using a product accurately is but one critical factor in any experiment, and people really wanted to know. An actual dedication to learn the truth involves fine-tuning or re-tries to know it was a more accurate test. Thanks for the effort. I need to find a different test review now.
I am the CEO of SYB, and we make the Phone Pouch that you tested in your video. And I wanted to take this opportunity to respond to your test.
First, I would like to thank you very much for taking the time to test these products. Given the increasing number of sources of human-made EMF in our environment, I encourage more people to learn how to test for themselves.
Now, regarding your test of our Phone Pouch, your measurements are from the front of our Pouch. This, unfortunately, means that your test does not actually test the shielding performance of our Pouch.
This is because the front of our Phone Pouch -- the side you tested -- is unshielded. It's the rear of our Pouch that is the shielded side.
This is an intentional design element of our Pouches. By shielding the rear of the Pouch, but not the front, our Pouch deflects harmful EMF radiation away from your body when you carry your phone -- without negatively impacting your phone's reception or battery life.
So taking measurements off the front of the Pouch would not be an accurate way to measure our product claims. You would need to take measurements from the back of the Pouch, as we do in this testing video: ua-cam.com/video/BQv9igT9vgI/v-deo.html
I would really appreciate it if you might consider redoing your test to measure the rear side of our Pouch that provides protection against radiation.
I would also note, as other commenters have, that when taking tests such as these, you should not wave around your meter -- that is not a way to get an accurate reading. You can take readings in multiple positions, but you should hold each position for at least a few seconds to get a reliable reading.
We cover this, and include several other tips, in the free ebook I wrote explaining how to conduct tests such as these. You can download that ebook, and see other EMF testing resources, here on our website: shieldyourbody.com/test
One final note, your meter is designed to detect low frequency (or ELF) magnetic and electric EMF radiation. That is important, but it is also important to measure the radio frequency (RF) and/or microwave (MW) frequency ranges of EMF radiation, which are the frequencies utilized for wireless communication. My ebook recommends a few meters that will do this. And, as one other commenter noted, the TriField is a great option because it includes an ELF-electric, ELF-magnetic and RF meter all in one, for a reasonable price.
Thank you once again for performing these tests. I really appreciate it when customers take the time to verify our product claims, and those of our competitors. I also hope that you will consider re-doing your test of our Pouch, by taking measurements off of the rear side of our Pouch, which is the side that provides protective shielding.
Sincerely,
R Blank
CEO
Shield Your Body
Read my mind
Yes there's a pulse cycle of reception or transmission.
Hello, I don't see a need to re-do the video because of the back or front of the pouch/case. You can see the winner of the video did not have a front cover and still for some reason, unknown to me, protected very well.
I am not a scientist and this is not my field of expertise, so I appreciate your detailed, educational response! But please understand that we are a normal consumer and this is just the result that came from our test with all cases/phone facing the same direction. No bias here.
What's the point in taking measurements from the back of the phone? Radiation is highest when giving and receiving calls, so are people supposed to talk with the back of the phone to their ear?
Katanya Jason people are supposed to do what people want to do.
If you want to protect yourself from EMF, don’t expose yourself to EMF.
I can't speak for all the other cases in your test, but I highly suggest that you test the RadiArmor case WITHOUT the phone first. I have the same EMF reader and I discovered that the EMF shielding is so good that it was actually picking up the EMF from the reader itself, not the phone. Please test it for yourself. I later used a more accurate EMF reader and I can confirm that the RadiArmor case does indeed block high frequency RF very effectively.
can you guys test the little anti radiation stickers?
They don't work. Seen them tested.
Beeping as a sign of emf is a very broad and general way of measuring emf and rf. It seems some of these cases semi protect and others protect. When you shake the meter around it makes it very hard for the viewer to determine to what extent these devices work (i.e observe frequency change) which would be valueable info. You have done this diligence so thank you for purchasing and testing these cases. Some people refrain from mentioning company names so it was nice to see a classic product video on emf protectors. Peace guys
I tried the link to get a tempered glass case and it doesn’t work nor can o find the case / name on Google etc… can you help me find a link please 🙏🏼
Have you had symptoms such as fatigue, headaches, poor memory, difficulty sleeping, and lack of clarity in your thoughts? It may seem like these could be the results of daily stress and frenzy, but there could be another culprit. All of these are symptoms of electro-sensitivity, which is something that more and more people find themselves affected by. Studies conducted in 1997 found "less than a few cases (of electro-sensitivity) per million", however now as much as 2.5% of the population is affected by electro-sensitivity. Even with the most moderate calculations, electrosensitivity is 10,000 times more common today than it was 20 years ago. Why could this be?
Electro-sensitivity and its symptoms appear to be triggered by certain microwave frequencies of electromagnetic radiation. Microwaves are frequently used in electronics for the purpose of communication between devices. Due to their high frequency, microwaves allow for higher transmission rates and smaller antenna sizes, which is perfect for high-tech devices that are constantly getting smaller and faster. These are devices such as cell phones, tablets, laptops, and any device that can connect to Wi-Fi, which can now include TVs and refrigerators
Furthermore, numerous studies (2011-2017) report an increased risk of brain cancer due to the use of mobile phones Concern for other cancers: breast (male and female), testis, leukemia, thyroid and much more. the current classification of radio frequencies as carcinogenic to humans (Class 2B) should be updated to carcinogenic to humans
Many claim that this is not true at all or that there is no evidence just to progress in the construction of radio transmitters!
And the 5 g accelerates all of this.
One piece of advice I would like to give you is to equip yourself with devices that protect against electromagnetic waves, such as the Aires tech products, produced by AMERICAN AIRES, in my opinion among the best on the market, have received praise and certifications from independent bodies of the remarkable functioning of their products
5g is part of progress, it is right to progress but why not protect yourself?
www.airestech.com/category/media/
sites.google.com/view/sources-electrosmog
ua-cam.com/video/zdxvfG353VM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/3u0yXc9sFps/v-deo.html
Below is a video on how to test the RadiArmor case using several common types of EMF readers, including the Meterk that is being used in this video.
ua-cam.com/video/ImPr5lAMFZA/v-deo.html
You'll notice that testing shielding efficacy can be a little tricky depending on the EMF reader. In this instance, the Meterk is reacting the EMF blocking liner, not what's coming off the phone.
Blah blah blah.
If i made a product i would make the tests in my favor too.
Thank you for testing these. Granite countertops give off radiation so maybe test again on another surface…
Which is the best one ?
Granite counters emit some radiation...testing results might be more accurate on another surface.
KATHY VELARDI they apparently don’t have a science background
yes thinking the samrthing i saw how the numbers were going high when he put the meter on the granite 😨😧
I had a thought… do you think that possibly because the phone had been on that call and maybe warming up, that is possibly why it showed higher readings through each cover that you tried after the first and second one?
I have a meter similar to yours they do NOT read all frequencies that were present during your test, this meter test low frequency range, It does Not do Medium to High freq range that cell phones put out. Also you do Not wave the meter around like in the video Wrong! this test was Not that useful. A trifield Meter can test a Much wider freq. range
Sylvia West that meter is garbage. Should use a trifield at least and their waving it like a wand. Damn rookies
The radiation protection in the pouch is on the back side. You need to flip it over to test it.
The link for the temperd glass doesn’t work any more can u tell me the name
You need a Trifield meter for better accuracy but yes everyone should have an EMF case for cell phone and tablets/laptops too
Obviously you don't understand RF
The radiation without any protection was 44, but your waving that reader around so no one can see anything- than you quickly move on and the best protector is 44.???
What kinda nonsensical experiment is this?
I use that emf meter in blue it like £15 off amazon and it’s not accurate often does miss reads as a paranormal investigation team worker
I use different emf meters as the e11 is inaccurate
Thanks for the video
Surprised you didn't try RF safe as I feel they are better than all the cases you had on this video.
By waving your tester makes a radiation itself
You’re picking up EMFs in the granite counter tops dude.
Why are they waving the meeter like fanning a fart? Anyway not one of the cases have I seen on any test stop the radiation
I think it’s a gay thing 🤣
The only thing that really works is wrapping your phone in aluminum foil.
Funny how the reading without the cases was the same as with the case on , you for got to mention that 🤫 waving the phone around so we can’t see it doesn’t help , but pausing the vid makes it really clear
🧐
Why carry your cards in a phone, so if you lose it it is a double disaster?
Your review makes me not trust ANY of these.. You scanned the microwave oven to show that the tester did something but no information of readings.. Then on each case same thing, too fast to provide readings. And it would help to get a baseline on the phone before putting into cases.. AND you probably would get a more accurate result if the phone was set to a call while the internet is also running on a active site.. You can do better next time.
I agree, you can always do better! But for the sake of finding out which case was the best bang for your buck. I believe we did have a solid conclusion or at least as solid as can be determined! The tempered glass case performed the best: amzn.to/2LHVEd2
EssentiaList read the CEO’s comment about the pouch case. You want to get a reading on both sides of all the cases as some cases intentionally have no shield on one of the sides so it bounces off the phone, and most importantly HOLD THE EMF READER STILL when performing these tests. Do not wave around, it gives very inaccurate readings!
EssentiaList You guys are so freaking clueless. Your consumers are TELLING you exactly what they want from you but you seem to stuck in your head in a way that is exactly the opposite of what one should do while trying to build an online review business. I just wanted to comment here so I can show this video and the exchange as an example of what not to do in the MBA course on startups that I will be teaching in Spring. Wow!
Malia yes their testing and meter suck
The front side reflects radiation and the back side blocks it
I have problem with front screen hurt my jaw and tooth
SafeSleeve I bought two phone covers and an IPad cover for radiation protection a year ago. Cost over $200 for 3 things and all 3 are coming apart. I commented this on their post and now they have blocked me from commenting. And they removed my post. Oh, forgot to add I put photos of damage to the IPad case and one Iphone case. Is this really how we di business? #BuyerBeware #SafeSleeve
Qrs quantron resonance is the proper way to address this and it affects other concerns .far superior to anything else
Do these companies have any legitimate claims or is everything just fake to steal your money?
Would be nice to see what the reading was properly and accurately without any phone case as the reading without a phone cases was not talked about or held in place so you could see it.
For all we know even they case with the lowest reading could have been the same as the phone ringing without the case? Pointless.
Exactly my point probably just a fake tests.
Excellent video bro!! So everybody who keeps there cell phones in there pocket must be getting tons of radiation!!
Sometimes when taking the test u might actully pick up the radiation of ur phone u are videoing with!
You tested the wrong side of the cases
This is faulty testing...no one should wave the tester around! It will produce inaccurate results every single time.
Earths flat
Sun revolves around us
Lol…. How do people think their cell phone is going to work if you block the signals?
You’re definitely waving way to fast. And you reader was going off in the beginning and you set the reader aside…it was going off by itself. 🤷🏽♂️
Maybe your flailing is creating radiation?
Not possible + it is supposed to be moved left to right to help detect.
@@essentialist310 The link for the temperd glass doesn’t work any more can u tell me the name
First of all there is no pruf that this type of radiation that the phones are exerting is dangerous ,if you doesn't know it visible light is also a type of radiation so the world radiation doesn't mean completely nothing ,that type of radiation is not ionizing which means that it can not damage the structure of your DNA so it can not cause cancer as many claim.
Secondly i have acived the same thing with 0.05 dollars worth of aluminium foil ,which means that there is no reason for that pricing.
Furthermore if your phone is inded realy shielded the wifi and every kind of communication that it allows will be gone so is practicly usles for some applications.
Kent Erz WRONG
Mmm why I am wrong though ,I am interesting to hear your opinion and point of view on the topic and also your explanation on why self phones can cause you harm.
None of these things work.
Horrible tests
Your meter is unreliable.
the truthHurtz absolutely correct it’s a POS