How to think about feelings - with Leonard Mlodinow

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 сер 2024
  • We’re told we need to master our emotions and think rationally to succeed. But cutting-edge science shows that feelings are every bit as important to our success as thinking.
    Watch the Q&A here: • Q&A: How to think abou...
    Buy Leonard's book here: geni.us/61HG
    0:00 Introduction
    0:36 What is emotion?
    5:27 Uncertainty in neuroscience
    6:50 Plato's perception of the brain
    8:09 Darwin's theory on human emotion
    14:50 How does emotion vary culturally?
    18:13 Other emotional creatures from fruit flies to bacteria
    22:18 Why have we evolved to be emotional?
    29:03 How neuroimaging has changed the emotional game
    34:32 The value of emotional intelligence
    38:09 Reappraisal as a tool for emotional regulation
    47:40 What research can tell us about the real world
    This video was livestreamed from the Royal Institution on 23 March 2022.
    Leonard Mlodinow is a scientist turned storyteller. He is the bestselling author of 'The Drunkard's Walk', 'Subliminal' and 'Elastic'. He co-authored two books with Stephen Hawking and later wrote an acclaimed memoir, 'Stephen Hawking', about their time together. He has written for television, including multiple episodes of 'Star Trek: The Next Generation', as well as helping Steven Spielberg and Robin Williams make a video game. There are now over one million copies of Leonard Mlodinow's books in print.
    Leonard's latest book, Emotional: The New Thinking About Feelings, is available from Amazon and all good bookstores.
    ----
    A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:
    Andy Carpenter, William Hudson, Richard Hawkins, Thomas Gønge, Don McLaughlin, Jonathan Sturm, Microslav Jarábek, Michael Rops, Supalak Foong, efkinel lo, Martin Paull, Ben Wynne-Simmons, Ivo Danihelka, Paulina Barren, Kevin Winoto, Jonathan Killin, Taylor Hornby, Rasiel Suarez, Stephan Giersche, William Billy Robillard, Scott Edwardsen, Jeffrey Schweitzer, Frances Dunne, jonas.app, Tim Karr, Adam Leos, Alan Latteri, Matt Townsend, John C. Vesey, Andrew McGhee, Robert Reinecke, Paul Brown, Lasse T Stendan, David Schick, Joe Godenzi, Dave Ostler, Osian Gwyn Williams, David Lindo, Roger Baker, Greg Nagel, Rebecca Pan.
    ---
    The Ri is on Patreon: / theroyalinsti. .
    and Twitter: / ri_science
    and Facebook: / royalinstitution
    and TikTok: / ri_science
    Listen to the Ri podcast: anchor.fm/ri-science-podcast
    Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/editing-ri-talks...
    Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsletter
    The Ri is on Patreon: / theroyalinstitution
    and Twitter: / ri_science
    and Facebook: / royalinstitution
    and TikTok: / ri_science
    Listen to the Ri podcast: anchor.fm/ri-science-podcast
    Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/editing-ri-talks...
    Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsletter
    Product links on this page may be affiliate links which means it won't cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  Рік тому +3

    What do you think about your feelings? Let us know in the comments - and watch the Q&A for this talk here: ua-cam.com/video/IYL3Zc0p3_0/v-deo.html

    • @john_hunter_
      @john_hunter_ Рік тому +1

      I've thought about this a lot. I think emotions are a sense in themselves. Emotions seem to be a sense that can sense the internal state of the brain. So it can sense your thoughts & then feeds you an emotion based on what you are thinking.
      Emotions also seem to be connected to the sense of touch in some way. I think this because you can also feel emotions in certain parts of your body. Maybe it's sort of like a virtual sense of touch in the same way you can imagine images or sounds in your mind. When you play a song in your head, it can sound real but it's a sound generated by your own brain & wasn't generated from an external sense.
      Emotions are a sense that is generated from the brain & isn't from an external source. I think it may also be a certain kind of synesthesia since it seems to be tied to the sense of touch. When you think about something, the emotion part of the brain generates the sense based on what you're thinking, & then uses the sense of touch to present it to you. In the same way people with synesthesia might see a number & then their brain presents that number to them with a certain colour.
      I think emotions exist as a sense because of evolutionary purposes. Senses are used to get you to behave in certain ways. When you feel something painful in your arm, you will remove your arm from the source of pain. Or if you taste something good, you will eat more of it. Emotions like loneliness seem to drive people into being in relationships with each other. Being in a relationship is an activity that would increase the chances of reproducing.

    • @savage22bolt32
      @savage22bolt32 Рік тому

      Honestly, when I read the title I skipped this one. A few days later, I was bored, so clicked.
      Leonard is an interesting man. I liked the conversation, especially towards the end. If he wrote a non-fiction novel of his family's travails, I bet it would be a best seller.

    • @NoxDNA
      @NoxDNA Рік тому

      E=MC^2
      Emotion = The net energy, in motion
      Mass = is the net stored energy. Trauma (good/bad) disregulation of the body.
      C = Speed of light. Aka information from the 12 cranial nerves.
      You're welcome. 2000 hours of my time over 365 days, doing trauma research. Delta-Physical, Delta-Mental, Delta-Genetic trauma.

  • @User-jr7vf
    @User-jr7vf Рік тому +3

    The addition of the timestamps is a very good idea. If I feel like a topic still needs to sink in, I can just go back to that topic and re-watch only the specific part of the video.

  • @GMC2001
    @GMC2001 Рік тому +3

    What a man. I feel humbled and grateful to hear what he has to say. Thank you.

  • @freddyjosereginomontalvo4667
    @freddyjosereginomontalvo4667 Рік тому +1

    Awesome channel with awesome content and great quality as always say

  • @riosen3903
    @riosen3903 Рік тому +4

    I mostly use emotions to draw motivation energy, Ideally I want to get rid of the lazy state i wake up everyday and trigger my hyperactivity the earliest possible,So I can start doing stuff I have deemed trivial automatically, without thinking, and that even includes talking and socialization.
    I mostly thinks of them as vectors spaces or colours that can combine and make a shades gamut rather rather than things that are in opposition and override each other. Like I kinda think that complex emotions made of antagonizing feelings love-hate are more funnier than by separate

  • @A-X-25
    @A-X-25 Рік тому +21

    Can you make a podcast titled "How to feel about thinking"?😂😂😂😂

  • @BoyKissBoy
    @BoyKissBoy Рік тому +2

    23:50, regarding the goose moving a softball into its nest and concluding "it's not motherly love, it's an automated behaviour": I'm not claiming it _is_ motherly love, but how would you tell the difference between "automated behaviour" and "believes the softball is an egg and therefore feels motherly love for it"?

  • @gidi1899
    @gidi1899 Рік тому

    I study the functionality of different emotions for a few years now. (pain -> point the area at risk, fear -> expect to
    put an area (in your inner world) at risk, promote existing the situation, ...)
    And I used to treat emotion as a sign for the actual function that takes place with regard to my intent,
    But when it comes to "pain", I feel I should treat it as if my intent held by me over a cliff, and as long as I hold the intent I keep it alive, which is a little different than treating emotions as signs.
    Is there a better view of emotion, that feels right when the emotion takes you?

    • @hannahperkins6183
      @hannahperkins6183 Рік тому

      Honestly this is a fascinating comment. I don’t think my emotions have intents! Trying to figure out your comment brings me to the beginning of it: the functionality of emotions. I’m just not sure that that’s what they’re there for. What makes you think emotions exist to be useful? Mine certainly are not! Lol

  • @N0Xa880iUL
    @N0Xa880iUL Рік тому +3

    Don't think about it. Feel it. That's the whole point.

    • @railgap
      @railgap Рік тому +2

      If that was your takeaway, you either failed to absorb, or misunderstood, half of the content. "the whole point" is that BOTH thinking AND feeling are very important.
      I know, I know, it's fifty-two minutes long and that's a lot of big words to listen to, but if you don't try again you will have wasted your time.

    • @A-X-25
      @A-X-25 Рік тому

      Can you make a podcast titled "How to feel about thinking"?😂😂😂😂

  • @fuzzy_lumkins0018
    @fuzzy_lumkins0018 Рік тому +1

    When I hear smart people talking about emotions one thing usually comes to mind and it's not the person I'm about to quote but the people who thought it was a good idea. Interviewer "how many moons does the earth have" guy "I don't know how am I supposed to know that I got a masters in liberal arts not geography... Oh I don't know this 30" Enough Said

    • @adam346
      @adam346 Рік тому

      Oh QI and the undiable duo of Stephen Fry and Allan Davis.

    • @fuzzy_lumkins0018
      @fuzzy_lumkins0018 Рік тому

      @@adam346 no it was a person who just graduated from a California university I would like to add yes he got a masters and yes I said graduated

  • @stinkymccheese8010
    @stinkymccheese8010 Рік тому +5

    Seems to me that people these days are a little too concerned with feeling and not concerned enough with rational thought.

    • @adam346
      @adam346 Рік тому +4

      that statement makes me angry.

    • @AtlanticPicture
      @AtlanticPicture Рік тому

      I'm offended that you were angered

    • @ZeHoSmusician
      @ZeHoSmusician Рік тому

      Humans have been like that (irrational, I mean) for thousands of years...

  • @MegaSpooney
    @MegaSpooney Рік тому +1

    This guy is at least 10 years behind the times. Batja Mesquita’s book, Between Us, and Lisa Barrett’s book, How Emotions Are Made, have already debunked virtually all of what he said here. Pretty embarrassing for him

    • @arasharfa
      @arasharfa Рік тому +1

      love Barrets book. reading it right now.

    • @MegaSpooney
      @MegaSpooney Рік тому

      @@arasharfa Nice, if you haven't already read it, cross-cultural emotions researcher Batja Mesquita's book, Between Us, is well worth checking out, in my opinion

  • @You_Can_Do_If
    @You_Can_Do_If Рік тому

    Our energy and surrounding awareness and reality integration is because of a omnipresent fungus invisible to us which we are connected in the frontal sinus

  • @smlanka4u
    @smlanka4u Рік тому +1

    The Buddha said that the mind uses 52 Mental Factors to process a thought.

    • @ZeHoSmusician
      @ZeHoSmusician Рік тому

      Is the Buddha a certified neuroscientist? No? Then nobody cares what he might say!

  • @ulysissira9808
    @ulysissira9808 Рік тому +1

    I lost my hope today.

  • @joshwalker9446
    @joshwalker9446 Рік тому +4

    Please stop with the video calls

  • @eddiejones.redvees
    @eddiejones.redvees Рік тому +3

    I made the Decision to stop watching after the first three minutes

    • @savage22bolt32
      @savage22bolt32 Рік тому

      You missed the end?
      I almost didn't start the vid, but it was pretty good as it got going!