SRE Nuclear Facility Decommissioning (1982)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 71

  • @Oliverdobbins
    @Oliverdobbins 2 роки тому +21

    So what I’m getting from this, is that if you want to get rid of anything at all, the best way to do it is to bury it in Nevada.

  • @78ythjasnx
    @78ythjasnx 9 років тому +10

    They also fail to mention sending radioactive structures to dumps and recylcing centers. They conventiantly dismantled numerous buildings despite being ordered not to do so until EPA assessment was completed.

  • @kathyrobinson9959
    @kathyrobinson9959 5 років тому +3

    Gotta love the sharp head coverings.

  • @bobsmith24868
    @bobsmith24868 7 років тому +24

    Good idea, paint it, then move it on the back of pickup trucks. Then bury it somewhere else.

    • @Duffman-zn7ku
      @Duffman-zn7ku 2 роки тому

      Bury?! Just shoot the sodium barrels with a hunting rifle and watch it burn while remembering to stand up wind...

  • @Nikolaii2571
    @Nikolaii2571 9 років тому +3

    I like your educational videos. That is one of the reasons why I haven subscribed to your channel.

  • @Josh-vj5ip
    @Josh-vj5ip 7 років тому +15

    Lovin the music

    • @bobsmith24868
      @bobsmith24868 7 років тому +6

      Tepco/NHK should use this kind of music in Fukushima videos they release to lighten the mood.

    • @justimagine2403
      @justimagine2403 4 роки тому +5

      The music sounds just like EPCOT center... also in 1982.

    • @geikosera
      @geikosera 10 місяців тому

      Tour of Industry" by Mike Vickers

    • @geikosera
      @geikosera 10 місяців тому

      also "Industrial Power "- Johnny Pearson

  • @leejamestheliar2085
    @leejamestheliar2085 5 років тому +11

    Reactors are like a box of chocolate ( that you left on the back porch on a sunny day)
    You never know what you got till it cools down and you take the lid off!
    Just tryin to help.

  • @SOAR1214
    @SOAR1214 2 роки тому +1

    Came here for the informed, half informed, uninformed, clueless, and funny comment. Was not disappointed!

  • @econoroller
    @econoroller 7 років тому +11

    14:30 shows a liquid waste tank. -One of those liquid waste tanks was discovered on an adjacent property....it had been hooked up backwards to the well pump so it would suck the contents out of the tank and send it's contents down into the well. No one really knows for sure what kind of waste it contained, how long it had been there pumping the waste into the water table/aquifer, or who had originally put it there, if a cleanup contractor had been instructed to put it there, or an underhanded deal had been made with the property owner to allow dumping there. We will probably never know.

    • @wyliesdiesels4169
      @wyliesdiesels4169 Рік тому +2

      where do you read about that? if it was a submersible well pump it would be impossible to hook it up backwards to a tank because the suction intake is in the well

  • @pierocampi2350
    @pierocampi2350 6 років тому +7

    The entire video is spine-chilling!! I wonder the consequences of this unspeakable behaviour on the "decommissioned" location, the people living there, the workers that were certainly exposed to high levels of "low level" radiations. Its an indicator of what is bound to happen always in the nuclear industry.

  • @aknewhope
    @aknewhope 9 років тому +17

    No mention of the meltdown. Find that kind of odd.

    • @Polaf3456
      @Polaf3456 9 років тому +2

      You mean that part at 1:32 where he says "and went critical in 1957" in reference to the incident?

    • @8088bit
      @8088bit 8 років тому +19

      no it is in reference the first time that it was turned on. going critical is when you have a self sustaining nuclear reaction. All nuclear power plants are critical if they are on-line and generating power.

    • @Polaf3456
      @Polaf3456 8 років тому +1

      8088bit Thats incorrect, nuclear criticality refers to an uncontrolled nuclear reaction, not a controlled one whatsoever.
      Nuclear reactions in power plants are specifically controlled to emit specific levels of radiation and heat.
      When a nuclear reactor goes critical, the radioactive isotope being used has started to rapidly decay beyond controllable rates, which is very bad.
      Nuclear criticality == Chernobyl and atom bombs

    • @orange70383
      @orange70383 7 років тому +1

      Yea that is obviously is a clear admission of the event, not. The op's statement is valid while your reply is rated f for fucked.

    • @willett786
      @willett786 7 років тому +10

      I think you're referring to supercriticality.

  • @SquishyZoran
    @SquishyZoran 6 років тому +5

    where can i get the music? I loved it!.

    • @MajorT0m
      @MajorT0m 4 роки тому +6

      It's not music, it's actually the sound recording equipment picking up harmful wavelengths of ionising radiation present at the facility. Facinating how it sounds like a four piece band.

    • @geikosera
      @geikosera 10 місяців тому

      "Tour of Industry" by Mike Vickers

    • @geikosera
      @geikosera 10 місяців тому

      And "Industrial Power "- Johnny Pearson

  • @vejet
    @vejet 4 роки тому +8

    22:10 I literally spit my drink out, that's hardly the legacy it has today.

    • @Youre_Right
      @Youre_Right 4 роки тому +9

      It should. It’s so much more efficient and cleaner then any other type of energy production. If it wasn’t for Russian cheapness and stupidity there would be so many more nuclear power plants. Chernobyl scared everyone that nuclear energy was blackballed. It’s stupid because what happened in Chernobyl could not happen anywhere else in the world. Safety systems and containment buildings would prevent it. The closest thing is Fukushima and they required a major catastrophe and still didn’t really cause widespread damage. Sure people would lose their lives in accidents, but that happens at McDonalds. No workplace is 100% safe and guaranteed to be accident free.

    • @tatotaytoman5934
      @tatotaytoman5934 2 роки тому

      @@Youre_Right the fact that fossil fuels cause far more deaths per year due to polluting substances and lung disease

  • @buddywilliams5650
    @buddywilliams5650 3 роки тому

    It said March of 1982. I wonder if John Belushi was still alive?

  • @kev-the-windsurfer.
    @kev-the-windsurfer. 3 роки тому +1

    Hows the music, what a hoot!! Yep we need power more than ever now with electric cars and so forth, so lets decommission the best way to generate power....

  • @orange70383
    @orange70383 7 років тому +7

    At 17:08 so plastic bags can provide safe effective storage for radioactive contaminated debris, that's good to know.

    • @hjembrentkent6181
      @hjembrentkent6181 7 років тому +7

      That was just for transport, but yes plastic stops the contamination from migrating

    • @snizzake
      @snizzake 5 років тому +1

      @@hjembrentkent6181 So why do I need a lead vest when I get an x ray?

    • @FaustoTheBoozehound
      @FaustoTheBoozehound 3 роки тому +3

      @@snizzake There's a difference between contamination, which is radioactive particles, and radiation or the energy that radioactive particles emit. Some types of radiation, including x-rays and gamma rays, go right through most matter except dense elements like lead. Contamination is similar to dust and can be contained, such as with plastic.

  • @carissa8283i
    @carissa8283i Рік тому

    Glad it was a total success, and I'm glad it made an insane amount of money. I'm glad that I was involved and that I was paid very well. It is awesome that I invented a anti-gravity device. Maybe someday we will tell them how we made it.

  • @bulgingbattery2050
    @bulgingbattery2050 2 роки тому +2

    The 1959 SRE accident released many times more radiation into the surrounding areas than three mile island.
    Few people know that this was the worst accident to occur at a nuclear energy facility in the United States, and not TMI.

    • @cat637d
      @cat637d Рік тому +1

      Absolutely incorrect! Cite your sources!

    • @VarunOregunta
      @VarunOregunta 8 місяців тому

      ​@@cat637dhe is correct please check your facts

    • @cat637d
      @cat637d 8 місяців тому

      The largest release of fission products to the environment occurred at the SL-1 reactor at INEL, Almost no activity was released from the SRE. The actinides and activation products were contained within the the reactor system and the sodium coolant. The removal of moderator and fuel elements was accomplished with closed systems devices and isolated for burial. Get your facts straight!

  • @GroovyVideo2
    @GroovyVideo2 3 роки тому +1

    corporate Greed left citizens the clean up bill

  • @jasminespencer3992
    @jasminespencer3992 Рік тому

    Note to self, stay away from Beatty, NV

  • @SigEpBlue
    @SigEpBlue 6 років тому +2

    10:39 I'd love to have been at _that_ meeting, where it was decided to use explosive cutting on the nuclear reactor parts.
    "Uh, boss, I have a Sawzall in my truck..."
    "Dammit, no! I've decided to use explosives, and we're usin' 'em!"

    • @magicstix0r
      @magicstix0r 5 років тому +7

      You're gonna cut 6 inch hardened stainless steel with a sawzall? LoL...

  • @evecvlt
    @evecvlt 2 місяці тому

    They dumped at the Heneme Beach site by the steel factory and recycled some material there too Boeing is aware.

  • @closer187a
    @closer187a Рік тому +2

    People are still dying from the Santa Susanna laboratory. Shame on you for making more propaganda on a ongoing radioactive problem.

  • @lego1631
    @lego1631 Рік тому +1

    Everyone out here and Simi Valley is getting cancer thanks to this.

  • @TheSolidsoundwavesif
    @TheSolidsoundwavesif 4 роки тому +1

    Santa Susana don't you melt-down on me
    I'm going to South Carolina with your nuclear junk and me behind the wheel. (...more later...)

  • @user-cf1se1kk5x
    @user-cf1se1kk5x 4 роки тому

    So I guess it was a total bust, nice candy coat though

  • @davidhudson5452
    @davidhudson5452 2 роки тому

    It was falling apart so was time to stop nice idea bad result

  • @gb5uq
    @gb5uq 6 років тому +4

    Just bury it, let someone else worry about it in years to come. When you consider what it costs to build then tear down these places and all the concomitant problems that remain and in some cases never go away, it becomes apparent that they are a financial black hole and cannot possibly make a profit.

    • @charlesbrown9176
      @charlesbrown9176 5 років тому +1

      Not a single one of you have any idea what you are talking about.

  • @toxicmorbosa2414
    @toxicmorbosa2414 5 років тому

    they buried it under Hueneme beach in california

  • @mrjoe2227
    @mrjoe2227 19 днів тому

    So almost every word he says was a lie…..

  • @MitzvosGolem1
    @MitzvosGolem1 4 роки тому

    Ignorance in comments abounds .

  • @redkellyre6568
    @redkellyre6568 5 років тому

    still hot as of 2018 lots for homes will be available in 4056

  • @mijKO
    @mijKO 6 років тому

    Um I wonder how many workers died of cancer? Also I highly doubt there was low levels of radioactivity because of the accident only 13 years before

    • @jeffmattsson7038
      @jeffmattsson7038 5 років тому +1

      according to these folks 3800: ua-cam.com/video/JATapwVwn4k/v-deo.html

  • @Ratkwad
    @Ratkwad 6 років тому +2

    WASTE OF MONEY