“After Man” Explained | Speculative Zoology

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
  • Imagine a version of Earth fifty million years in the future - where humanity has vanished, and extraordinary new creatures have evolved. Welcome to Dougal Dixon’s “After Man.”
    ---
    Subscribe to stay up to date with The Archive: / @curiousarchive
    Curious Archive Social Media:
    Twitter: / curious_archive
    Instagram: / curiousarchive
    Facebook: / curiousarchiveyoutube
    ‘After Man’ is a retro-art filled speculative zoology book written by Dougal Dixon. The book is part of a trilogy alongside ‘Man After Man’ and ‘The New Dinosaurs’ - I have a video on The new Dinosaurs in the archive. After Man also influenced other series like the Future is Wild, and C. M. Kosemen's infamous ‘All Tomorrows.’
    ‘After Man’s’ impact no surprise, as the post-human Earth Dixon brings to life within the pages feels so familiar, and yet so alien. And the biology of the futuristic animals he showcases are so strange, it’s worth taking a closer look. So, for this entry into the archive, we’re going to break down the animal ecosystems of the far future, bearing in mind that some of the science is outdated, and it’s impossible to know exactly what such a world would look like. Think of this book and this video as just an interesting guess.
    So, let’s leap forwards fifty million years, and discover what types of fantastical species might now reign over the planet.
    0:00 A New World
    1:21 Temperate Forests & Grasslands
    3:23 Coniferous Forests
    4:19 Tundra and the Polar Regions
    5:52 Deserts
    7:09 Tropical Grasslands
    8:29 Tropical Forests
    9:28 Islands
    10:35 Outro
    All book credit goes to the brilliant Dougal Dixon, please support his amazing work!
    Website here: www.dougal-dixon.co.uk/
    Copyright Disclaimer: Under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. All video/image content is edited under fair use rights for reasons of commentary and social satire.
    I do not own the images, music, or footage used in this video. All rights and credit goes to the original owners.
    ♫ Beauty Flow by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
    creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
    #CuriousArchive #AfterMan #SpeculativeZoology
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,5 тис.

  • @everything-yd4xm
    @everything-yd4xm 2 роки тому +5273

    Queen Elizabeth is so lucky to witness these beautiful animals in the future

  • @yaafl817
    @yaafl817 2 роки тому +3684

    People: "What will animals look like in the future?"
    Dixon: "H O R N S"

    • @Ezullof
      @Ezullof 2 роки тому +278

      What's particularly funny is the obsession with downward-bent horns.
      Mammals had all kinds of funky horns across their evolutionary history, but downward horns are very rare.

    • @phuocminhluu2919
      @phuocminhluu2919 2 роки тому +76

      and Rodents

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому +4

      @@Ezullof Hi.
      Ever thought 'If i could only help UA-cam become
      less of a Mess! Cause it annoys me that its a Mess!
      But i dont know how!!'
      ?

    • @Faraway994
      @Faraway994 2 роки тому +35

      You could say he thinks all the animals are horny

    • @tijanamilenkovic3425
      @tijanamilenkovic3425 2 роки тому +14

      @@Faraway994 good one

  • @2intense857
    @2intense857 2 роки тому +650

    Pokemon Company:
    "Write that down, write that down"

    • @Randomdudefromtheinternet
      @Randomdudefromtheinternet 2 роки тому +18

      I’ve never wanted something so much that I didn’t know I wanted in my life

    • @dubuyajay9964
      @dubuyajay9964 2 роки тому +21

      Dougal is very popular in Japan. He even had a book that was ONLY published in Japan.

    • @triplezz01
      @triplezz01 2 роки тому +3

      Lmao true

    • @imAdolff
      @imAdolff 2 роки тому +3

      @@dubuyajay9964 what's the name of the book?

    • @toymagmadon07
      @toymagmadon07 2 роки тому +6

      @@imAdolff Green World

  • @GlassesnMouthplates
    @GlassesnMouthplates 2 роки тому +1455

    Dixon: Here we have the Aeropanda.
    Me: Cool, a Panda with wings?
    Dixon: Despite its name, it resembles more like a squid with rocket thrusters.
    Me: Odd..., still a cool evolution of the squid though.
    Dixon: Despite its look, its ancestor was actually the Tibetan Fox.

  • @theonly6blake911
    @theonly6blake911 2 роки тому +2491

    So in 2021 we have entered the Speculative Zoology Renaissance, I don’t mind this one bit

    • @spikyballoon6207
      @spikyballoon6207 2 роки тому +21

      ikr

    • @historynerd556
      @historynerd556 2 роки тому +120

      Yeah, I found it interesting before the All Tomorrows rage. I'm glad this type of half-fiction is becoming popular.

    • @spikyballoon6207
      @spikyballoon6207 2 роки тому +9

      @@historynerd556 me 2

    • @shoeberrypie
      @shoeberrypie 2 роки тому +6

      Also in tandem with the Dune hype

    • @idkjordash
      @idkjordash 2 роки тому +76

      People want to move on from 2020 so bad we’re already imagining a world where we’ve all died

  • @TheRougeFearow
    @TheRougeFearow 2 роки тому +909

    "bats evolving to mimic flowers is absurd."
    The tawny frogmouth mimics flowers sometimes. It's a bird with a bright yellow mouth that attracts bugs.

    • @brettthebest3978
      @brettthebest3978 2 роки тому +43

      Yeah it’s probably one of most accurate in this book

    • @joela6895
      @joela6895 2 роки тому +35

      The praying mantis does this too

    • @dubuyajay9964
      @dubuyajay9964 2 роки тому +1

      #OOF

    • @SCP-4335MW
      @SCP-4335MW 2 роки тому

      There are also mantis

    • @kaical8273
      @kaical8273 2 роки тому +2

      Except mammals and amphibians are not really that related. Technically most of these are "possible" anatomically speaking but they wouldn't ever occur realistically speaking.

  • @kalechips4564
    @kalechips4564 2 роки тому +124

    It would be very fun if at the end he wrote something like “this is the horseshoe crab, it remains unchanged”

    • @user-td6wy7xe8s
      @user-td6wy7xe8s 10 місяців тому +5

      Genius

    • @Mr_Reaps25
      @Mr_Reaps25 8 місяців тому +1

      Yessss

    • @annihilation777
      @annihilation777 6 місяців тому

      Tbh a lot of animals probably won't change

    • @ornitorinco78
      @ornitorinco78 6 місяців тому +4

      In the book, Dixon mentions that while there are changes in the marine environment, they would only be of interest to the specialist. Similar idea. I loved looking at the diagrams of which orders still survived in the posthomic.

  • @Imperiused
    @Imperiused 2 роки тому +28

    The Nightstalker, the Vortex, and the Rabbuck were always my personal favorites from After Man. I seriously question the concept of Swimming Anteater though. :D

    • @David-S.130
      @David-S.130 Рік тому +2

      maybe ants evolved into water insects so the anteater had to evolve with it

  • @CuriousArchive
    @CuriousArchive  2 роки тому +648

    Quick correction to this video: the chicken isn't actually the closet living relative to the Tyrannosaurus Rex -- the study I was citing is outdated. Chickens are related to therapods, but aren't uniquely close to the T-Rex when compared to other bird species.

    • @gabriel_garcia__
      @gabriel_garcia__ 2 роки тому +6

      Ok

    • @stevenandersen6989
      @stevenandersen6989 2 роки тому +17

      Yeah, because if the Chicken was closely related to the T rex, they all would be.

    • @alvaronavarro4895
      @alvaronavarro4895 2 роки тому +16

      So what's the current closest living relative of T-Rex? (An specific species, not "BirDs" (everyone knows that)

    • @stevenandersen6989
      @stevenandersen6989 2 роки тому +16

      @@alvaronavarro4895 I don't know they exact species it descended, but I know the Bird they descended from. Archaeopteryx, in the late Juassic, was either one of the first Birds, or the first bird to ever exist, and is the ancestor to all living and non living birds.

    • @alvaronavarro4895
      @alvaronavarro4895 2 роки тому +5

      @@stevenandersen6989 I know that already Bro, but thanks for the knowledge anyway :D!

  • @bigpapa8225
    @bigpapa8225 2 роки тому +930

    I feel like we can’t come even close to understanding what the future animals would look like without first understanding the climate and ecosystem

    • @Ezullof
      @Ezullof 2 роки тому +112

      The first dozen of pages of the book covers that.
      In fact, currently it's much easier to predict future climates, and how future ecosystems will work as a whole, than to predict what animals specifically will fill each niche.

    • @loturzelrestaurant
      @loturzelrestaurant 2 роки тому +6

      @@Ezullof Indeed. Well said.
      May i say something off-topic though?
      I thought this channel's comment-section/s, if any place,
      would have smarteristic and smarttastic people.
      So i wanted to ask your opinion of a Project of mine,
      trying to help youtube help itself - getting it to become less
      of what can only be described as 'Messy' without wanting
      to use hard swearing...
      P0rn, Racism, Sexism, Scam, Spam-Bots, P0rn-Spam-Bots
      and much more. Oh, and of course the new Kid in Town:
      The Covid-Denier/Mask-Hater.
      All of them are non-subtle (some more than others)
      and therefore easy to find.
      I used the reportbutton as it was originally intended;
      not as Cancel-Culture but to help.
      Just this week, i got 1 Covid-Denier-Channel (yes, the entire thing,
      not just 1 video) and 2 Open Racists (Users, not UA-camrs) removed.
      And this feels good.
      No, its not a 'Wonder-Miracle-Solution!!', but who needs that? Do you need that?
      If so, ok, i dont have anything for you.

    • @lolomgwtfkaya6066
      @lolomgwtfkaya6066 2 роки тому +5

      @@loturzelrestaurant Good job. Unfortunately, the hypocrites in the modern world like to address themselves as “anti-nazi” or “acceptive” while simultaneously displaying acts and beliefs of fascism, only blinded by the “self-righteous” belief they like to bubble themselves in. If I hadn’t known any better, I would call them mentally diseased, but unfortunately I know its a byproduct of uneducated self proclaimed “intellectuals”

    • @loturzelrestaurant
      @loturzelrestaurant 2 роки тому

      @@lolomgwtfkaya6066 I know what you mean.

    • @loturzelrestaurant
      @loturzelrestaurant 2 роки тому +1

      @@lolomgwtfkaya6066 You sound like you wanna act, but dont know why,
      causing you to only talk about the Issues, but not acting.
      Well, here i am, trying to tell you that you do have Options.

  • @Zamiiz
    @Zamiiz 2 роки тому +47

    What’s interesting to me is what people of the future will think about these Future Zoology documents, and how they could line up the current events from when they were written to gain an idea of the authors’ perspectives of the future

  • @justjones5430
    @justjones5430 2 роки тому +52

    I've had this book since the early 80's, it's waaaaay out of date.
    I'd love to see a new edition that encompasses more up to date info. 🙂

    • @KristinkaAranova
      @KristinkaAranova Рік тому +1

      Lol how can something speculating 5 billions years be out or date

    • @youdonotcare
      @youdonotcare Рік тому +3

      @@KristinkaAranova the way it speculates on how animals would evolve would be ood

    • @GentlemanQ
      @GentlemanQ 6 місяців тому

      You mean more up to date pseudoscience illustrations.

    • @amelliamendel2227
      @amelliamendel2227 6 місяців тому

      No, the new evidence that oxygen continues to decline which will perpetuate species continuing to reduce in size. Not one single example of any species gaining in size in the last 200 years. 2 years ago we didn't understand how much oxygen is reducing over time on earth.

    • @TheHolladiewaldfeee
      @TheHolladiewaldfeee 5 місяців тому

      ​​@@youdonotcareyeah tbh we would speculate 99,9 % now as much as 40 years ago

  • @jasperfitzgerald2760
    @jasperfitzgerald2760 2 роки тому +1868

    Love how people are getting into speculative zoology so interesting!!

    • @reganwilliams7830
      @reganwilliams7830 2 роки тому +12

      It is really interesting

    • @hdirkfosd2546
      @hdirkfosd2546 2 роки тому +4

      It is indeed really interesting

    • @frog6054
      @frog6054 2 роки тому +18

      I found it to be extremely interesting 2 years ago. I'm glad many people share the same passion as me now.

    • @roachead6271
      @roachead6271 2 роки тому +3

      Love to see that everybody else has these kind of videos in their reccomended

    • @pacoramon9468
      @pacoramon9468 2 роки тому +13

      People have been into it since the birth of man, just look at hydras, goblins or wendigos.

  • @wargriffin5
    @wargriffin5 2 роки тому +759

    "rabbits have evolved to fill the same niche that deer once did..."
    - Wait, what happened to all the deer?

    • @narxes
      @narxes 2 роки тому +220

      The same thing that happened to all animals too big to survive mass extinctions.

    • @mushrooms5601
      @mushrooms5601 2 роки тому +64

      @Mother Rab I don’t like where this is going

    • @ewanhogg3068
      @ewanhogg3068 2 роки тому +180

      Presumably, they died out in a mass extinction and left their niche open for a smaller creature that then became large - just like what happened with the original mammals.

    • @classichorrorenthusiast
      @classichorrorenthusiast 2 роки тому +9

      @@mushrooms5601 me neither

    • @handleisntfkinavailable
      @handleisntfkinavailable 2 роки тому +22

      @Mother Rab to fight to the death in a battle royale with nothing but their own skills and claws/horns/jaws/venom

  • @TheChangeling13
    @TheChangeling13 2 роки тому +51

    Will admit, had me in the first half, but after the animal with the horns to push snow out of the way, I started critiquing more of these speculations and realized a lot of them are baseless speculation. Not to say no one can do any speculating on what the future holds, but for educational purposes, not enough research went into these changes.
    If an animal needed horns to push snow out of the way, why don't deer do that? A lot of the way animals evolved is about energy conversation. Having to constantly shovel snow out of the way is a lot of work and its extremely inefficient. Heavier animals like bears hibernate, and animals that hunt in the winter, like the lynx, have larger feet to act like snowshoes to keep them from sinking in.
    There's more I want to touch on but for the sake of not getting lengthy, This is my big example of why a lot of these are unrealistic. The nature of speculation is still fun though.

    • @Shenordak
      @Shenordak 2 роки тому +16

      Reindeer, the only deer in which both sexes have horns, do just that: they use their horns to scrape and shovel away snow to get to the plants underneath.

    • @groovi35
      @groovi35 2 роки тому +1

      I was looking for a comment like this

    • @sephirothcrescent5768
      @sephirothcrescent5768 2 роки тому +5

      I think only a few of these speculations are more realistic but not everything. like the one for the monkeys and the bats i think those are far more unrealistic same for the penguins and rabbits.

    • @dokusa2173
      @dokusa2173 2 роки тому +7

      Squirrel with barb tail would need to keep it high enough not to drag on the ground, or else the barbs will be damaged, lost, wasted, etc. The tail can't curl in on itself like usual, or the squirrel might stab itself. So already we need a heavier muscle system to support the tail along the back and keep it off the ground. Which means the squirrel has less agility and requires more to eat. This is the sort of trend that just keeps happening. It's not very realistic just like you said, but it is fun! :>

    • @mitchderise73
      @mitchderise73 Рік тому +1

      I agree. It seems more imaginative than speculative which is still interesting but has it's own place

  • @orf5223
    @orf5223 Рік тому +4

    "Hopefully wolf sized rats aren't something we have to deal with"
    Capybara : Am I a joke to you?

    • @orf5223
      @orf5223 Рік тому +2

      Thanks for liking my video random guy

  • @shan3622
    @shan3622 2 роки тому +1460

    Let’s just hope the Qu doesn’t screw our anatomy in the next 10 million years

    • @colk5373
      @colk5373 2 роки тому +114

      “those goddamn rats keep shitting into our creation’s mouths”

    • @viktorbirkeland6520
      @viktorbirkeland6520 2 роки тому +78

      Honestly, creationism is so boring. Like, it's wrong, but it's also so boring. Evolution is wild. It's insane. I love it

    • @corvoattano4223
      @corvoattano4223 2 роки тому +41

      Man After Man: screw the Qu i have the shibaladabaladigabdaa

    • @simonsalisbury7606
      @simonsalisbury7606 2 роки тому +13

      Excellent reference

    • @ApetheWizard
      @ApetheWizard 2 роки тому +2

      The qu is fictional

  • @deadly_golem
    @deadly_golem 2 роки тому +1269

    "Im glad that wolf-sized rats aren't something we have to deal with in our time"
    Capybaras: Am I a joke to you

    • @ewanhogg3068
      @ewanhogg3068 2 роки тому +201

      "No, but you're more accurately described as a guinea pig the size of a regular pig."

    • @deadly_golem
      @deadly_golem 2 роки тому +62

      True... but I decided the stretch was worth it for the joke.

    • @shafiqjames6767
      @shafiqjames6767 2 роки тому +2

      It does

    • @Valerio_the_wandering_sprite
      @Valerio_the_wandering_sprite 2 роки тому +43

      Except that capybaras don't eat long pork and along with their fluffier cousins they are among the friendliest critters in South America. 🥩

    • @ardademir1661
      @ardademir1661 2 роки тому +32

      Wtf capybaras are like the most chill animal ever

  • @curiouscreation55
    @curiouscreation55 2 роки тому +6

    A channel that focuses on speculative biology as well as realistic fantastical storytelling and world building is the perfect content for me and some of the rarest, most well done on the internet

  • @rodcab2973
    @rodcab2973 2 роки тому +24

    I love to compare these speculative evolutionary possibilities to those of Renaissance artists drawing animals they'd only ever hear of but had never actually seen.

    • @thedude4594
      @thedude4594 Рік тому +2

      You mean exactly like they did with the past…😅

  • @ylussjoel
    @ylussjoel 2 роки тому +392

    This channel is criminally underrated.

    • @_SUPERN0VA_
      @_SUPERN0VA_ 2 роки тому

      No

    • @ylussjoel
      @ylussjoel 2 роки тому +8

      @@_SUPERN0VA_ it is

    • @ylussjoel
      @ylussjoel 2 роки тому +5

      @@_SUPERN0VA_ it deserves at least 3M subs

    • @ArtisticlyAlexis
      @ArtisticlyAlexis 2 роки тому +7

      The algorithm gods were smiling today, because they have another sub from me!

    • @Ezullof
      @Ezullof 2 роки тому +6

      I mean, this vidéo is just about saying out loud the content of a book. It doesn't add anything to it. Still interesting, but come on.

  • @starset4life175
    @starset4life175 2 роки тому +1328

    Me and the boys evolving into new species 50 million years after man:

    • @blazingtrs6348
      @blazingtrs6348 2 роки тому +15

      you mean man after man

    • @spikyballoon6207
      @spikyballoon6207 2 роки тому +24

      @@blazingtrs6348 then he would say:
      Me and the boys evolving into species 50 million years man after man

    • @unknownusers0000
      @unknownusers0000 2 роки тому +13

      Swimming monke

    • @LuLu.Leigh420
      @LuLu.Leigh420 2 роки тому +16

      @@unknownusers0000 mermonke

    • @j-core2895
      @j-core2895 2 роки тому +12

      @@LuLu.Leigh420 aquamonke

  • @viniciuspaiva3578
    @viniciuspaiva3578 2 роки тому +22

    I’m working on my own speculative biology project, one that involves that starts with a post nuclear war Earth, with the humans leaving the Earth, with all the wildlife and many of the flora in arks, leaving the pests and majority of the pets and livestock to die.
    But, nature finds a way, and Earth gets restored with the new species filling as many niches as possible

    • @VincentEdelstein
      @VincentEdelstein 2 роки тому

      Uhoh we both have the same idea 😅

    • @viniciuspaiva3578
      @viniciuspaiva3578 2 роки тому

      @@VincentEdelstein hey!

    • @blartversenwaldiii
      @blartversenwaldiii 2 роки тому

      @@VincentEdelstein it is a pretty good idea

    • @entertainment-ox8gl
      @entertainment-ox8gl 2 роки тому

      When will it be released? Is there a video about it?

    • @Kraziguhy
      @Kraziguhy 3 місяці тому

      That's literally what in my mind.
      I wonder what the animals would look like.

  • @newtdockery9575
    @newtdockery9575 2 роки тому +10

    I’ll never forget the Bat that walks on the front legs. We read that book when I was in first grade back in 1993. A paleontologist came to our class and showed us fossils. We also went to a tar pit.

  • @shamanbc9952
    @shamanbc9952 2 роки тому +196

    Hopefully the All Tomorrow’s and Man after Man boom in popularity going on right now will give this a boost, great video it’s crazy it doesn’t have more views!

    • @CuriousArchive
      @CuriousArchive  2 роки тому +22

      Thank you, glad you enjoyed it!

    • @gustttttttt
      @gustttttttt 2 роки тому +5

      they both did lol

    • @bobydigital2450
      @bobydigital2450 2 роки тому +8

      All tomorrow >man after man

    • @megazillasaurus
      @megazillasaurus 2 роки тому +2

      I've seen lots of all tomorrow's videos on UA-cam

    • @maximocosta9415
      @maximocosta9415 2 роки тому +9

      @@bobydigital2450 i mean yeah, both of those books are good but all tomorrows is better by a large margin.
      However i think after man (the book in the video) is definitely better than those two for being an actual, way more realistic, speculative zoology book, going by it's purpose of investigating evolution and biology and not trying to tell some science fiction history.

  • @madeofmandrake1748
    @madeofmandrake1748 2 роки тому +140

    I read this book growing up and was astounded by how inventive some of these species are. My favourite was the Meaching; a descendant of the lemming, which build colonies under the snow using dead vegetation like half-ant/half-beavers. Another is the Pfrit, a small rodent with an anteater-shaped mouth that uses fine hairs on its feet and tail to skate on top of the water, eating the insects below the surface.
    Glad to see that this book hasn't been forgotten!

    • @monstermaker73
      @monstermaker73 2 роки тому +6

      I am quite glad I wasn't the only one to find After Man truly fascinating!
      One of my favorites was the Raboon. I found it impossibly intriguing that a primate could evolve a more theropod-esk build theoretically, but then again, speculative evolution is never necessarily wrong.

  • @ConstantineBlackwood
    @ConstantineBlackwood 2 роки тому

    This was one of my favorite books growing up! So glad you made a video on this

  • @mindchiseling2
    @mindchiseling2 2 роки тому +30

    Animals in 50 million years:
    "Well, I guess its time to be a carnivore"

  • @amfvideos6810
    @amfvideos6810 2 роки тому +273

    Awesome, looks like All Tomorrows is opening up doors to other types of spec. I'm glad my favourite genre is getting more attention.

    • @HuskySansVergogne
      @HuskySansVergogne 2 роки тому +21

      You don't know much about your "favorite genre" it seems

    • @ComradePilas
      @ComradePilas 2 роки тому +5

      Poser moment

    • @MigWith
      @MigWith 2 роки тому +11

      @@HuskySansVergogne did you think about people founding about a genre turning it in their favorite even not knowing much about it? Yeah... It happens a lot, you don't have to know everything about it to be you favorite, because you could just found it out

    • @melod_1144
      @melod_1144 2 роки тому

      me too ☺️

    • @the_Googie
      @the_Googie 2 роки тому +11

      @@HuskySansVergogne im sure what they meant is that the popularity of All Tomorrows sheds light on previous, current and furure alliterations of the genre, not that AT came first..

  • @bread5350
    @bread5350 2 роки тому +150

    Imagine Ark but with these creatures.

    • @gonzalo600
      @gonzalo600 2 роки тому +5

      It will be strange

    • @kontroller5304
      @kontroller5304 2 роки тому +11

      genesis part 3?

    • @monstermaker73
      @monstermaker73 2 роки тому +8

      God, it would be a spectacle.

    • @PlanetShlorpian
      @PlanetShlorpian 2 роки тому +8

      Imagine Ark but single player focused and good.

    • @monstermaker73
      @monstermaker73 2 роки тому +4

      @@PlanetShlorpian If it is good or not is a matter of perspective. Hard? That is without question.
      Though I do feel like we will be getting a more individualistic-styled experience with Ark ||.

  • @alexanderstottlemyre3679
    @alexanderstottlemyre3679 2 роки тому +16

    so basically almost everything is a descendant of a rodent and penguins are now whales and dolphins
    10:13 i now immediately love this thing to cause it's so goofy looking

  • @Belac252
    @Belac252 2 роки тому

    I really want more vids like this, keep up the great content!

  • @danny08390
    @danny08390 2 роки тому +40

    I remember reading his books back in primary school. Man those were the days

    • @user-lq4ct6dr5m
      @user-lq4ct6dr5m 2 роки тому +2

      I got a original copy in my bookshelf

    • @aaronmarks9366
      @aaronmarks9366 2 роки тому

      There's nothing like 80s-90s kids science books. Miss those Scholastic book catelogs.

  • @yorhaunit21o32
    @yorhaunit21o32 2 роки тому +201

    To be honest the only one i see ACTUALLY being evolved in the future are the penguins into fully aquatic animals.

    • @pbroski92
      @pbroski92 2 роки тому +25

      And seals and comparable aquatic carnivores to take on more of an Orca/Dolphin/Whale role since those are declining

    • @nebulousisgod
      @nebulousisgod 2 роки тому +7

      Because we’re screwing with the planet’s ecosystems so much it’s tough to imagine how it’ll effect everything, besides killing it.

    • @osmanthewoodsman5040
      @osmanthewoodsman5040 2 роки тому +1

      How would they hatch their eggs if they were fully aquatic and couldn't go on land?

    • @pbroski92
      @pbroski92 2 роки тому +19

      @@osmanthewoodsman5040 to answer that question just look at sharks :) even ichtyosaurs and plesiosaurs were revealed to hatch live young as the fossil record reveals

    • @Ozraptor4
      @Ozraptor4 2 роки тому +14

      @@pbroski92 seems to be extremely difficult for animals with heavily calcified eggshells to develop viviparity. Livebearing reptiles belong to groups with parchment-type eggshells. Turtles, crocs and birds (all of which have calcified eggshells) seem to be permanently stuck with egg laying.

  • @caesarsalad9288
    @caesarsalad9288 2 роки тому +2

    watching this video feels like looking at a picture book as a little child while getting read the texts by a grownup, so wholesome^^

  • @jerrybailey5797
    @jerrybailey5797 2 роки тому +2

    I'm loving this speculative zoology , makes you think and wonder about what life could be like in millions of years time on earth

  • @kenet362
    @kenet362 2 роки тому +127

    So basically everything in the future gets bigger, oh and I couldn’t forget R A T S lots of them

    • @bobliboggin7375
      @bobliboggin7375 2 роки тому +1

      Human killed to extinction most non rat animals

    • @shafiqjames6767
      @shafiqjames6767 2 роки тому +4

      Funny how evolution renders animal smaller for millions generations untill they decide to draw it bigger

    • @bobliboggin7375
      @bobliboggin7375 2 роки тому

      @@shafiqjames6767 Well, the Rabbuck is a real animal today, and it lives exactly there. You can pet a dolichotis patagonum on many zoo.

    • @Ezullof
      @Ezullof 2 роки тому +8

      Not really. The modern megafauna disappeared, so smaller animals fill the niches left empty. And yes it means getting bigger. But it doesn't mean that there are no small animal left.
      It's a very old story. Everytime there's a big extinction event, the bigger animals disappear and the smaller ones evolve to fill the ecosystems.

    • @Ezullof
      @Ezullof 2 роки тому

      @@shafiqjames6767 It doesn't though. Humans are directly responsible for the disappearance of megafauna around the globe. We are an extinction event. Evolution is a force we are fighting against.

  • @kwek2798
    @kwek2798 2 роки тому +45

    This book *shows canine looking animal*
    “This is a descendant of the snake”

  • @brandonbloch7868
    @brandonbloch7868 2 роки тому +3

    My favorite book as a kid. Really sparked my imagination. So cool to see it's coming back up!

  • @jenna1931
    @jenna1931 2 роки тому +1

    I've seen most of these animals in a book collection my mother had. There were only a few pages in one book, so it was far from being complete, but it was my favorite one. It was something like 20-25 years ago! I'm so glad to see these creatures again!!

  • @gandsproductions5105
    @gandsproductions5105 2 роки тому +86

    I really do love the designs of these animals. There so imaginative but yet realistic.

    • @gandsproductions5105
      @gandsproductions5105 2 роки тому +4

      @Chazzerine well that's an exception to the norm. Of all things that one really doesn't make sense. Why would you flip your legs around like that idk

    • @capootiscrepitoos
      @capootiscrepitoos 2 роки тому +6

      @@gandsproductions5105 It makes sense if you look at how present bats work. The legs are used for grabbing, and the arms are used for locomotion. The Nightstalker works the exact same way but for the ground, the arms now running instead of flapping. Not really the best evolution, but makes sense as the quickest path from modern bats.

    • @gandsproductions5105
      @gandsproductions5105 2 роки тому

      @@capootiscrepitoos well weren't the flooers also bats? And they had normal arms and legs.

    • @capootiscrepitoos
      @capootiscrepitoos 2 роки тому

      @@gandsproductions5105 They just sit still all day waiting for food, so their legs barely need to evolve to do anything really

    • @gandsproductions5105
      @gandsproductions5105 2 роки тому

      @@capootiscrepitoos it still stands that they have fully formed fingers and hands. I just think it's a bit backwards

  • @certifiedbruhmoment2173
    @certifiedbruhmoment2173 2 роки тому +30

    I love how creative people can get

  • @jaredcarlson7108
    @jaredcarlson7108 2 роки тому

    Hey man just found your channel, love this kinda stuff. Keep up the good work!

  • @benjaminbrand3714
    @benjaminbrand3714 2 роки тому +4

    Anyone else think the Horrane look like a lifelike Dr. Seuss drawing? 😂
    Incredible work though! I love this area of biology

  • @somedude2468
    @somedude2468 2 роки тому +19

    Imagine a world where you see these animals roaming around futuristic city ruins and architecture worn by time covered in plantation and overgrowth. Rabbucks grazing on plains with giant radio towers and floating broken windmills, gigantelopes pushing away huge metallic fragments hidden underneath snow and ice, it’s crazy how cool and beautiful this concept is.

    • @Captianmex1C0
      @Captianmex1C0 2 роки тому

      Until all the Nuclear Power Plants Have a meltdown without Humans there to Contain them. And the world enters a Nuclear winter

    • @Leafs_dragons432
      @Leafs_dragons432 Рік тому

      Yea

    • @Programartemis
      @Programartemis Рік тому +2

      I don't think any of our buildings will last 50 million years, even if they are more advanced.

    • @ThePheonix66
      @ThePheonix66 Рік тому

      At the rate nature and time naturally decays, overwhelms, and reclaims man made structures, I highly doubt anything manmade will last more than a few thousand years let alone 1 million.

    • @somedude2468
      @somedude2468 Рік тому

      @@ThePheonix66 some things we made or will make in the future will stay there for a long damn time. If pyramids can last a few thousand years just being rocks, then the stuff we have now must last way longer

  • @JackTWT
    @JackTWT 2 роки тому +89

    Imagine the Future Humans living with these abominations
    Also, Monke Swim

    • @Ezullof
      @Ezullof 2 роки тому +10

      Well the concept of the book is precisely to imagine how animals would evolve if humans were to disappear today.
      If humans were still around, then it would be a completely different story... For once, I very much doubt most wild animals would survive.

    • @dietrevich
      @dietrevich 2 роки тому +18

      Humans are already an abomination, think naked hairless ape.

    • @moonooze6171
      @moonooze6171 2 роки тому

      @@dietrevich you are so brave to say that.

    • @cloud2578
      @cloud2578 2 роки тому +1

      @@dietrevich 😲 wow vary brave!

    • @gnochhuos645
      @gnochhuos645 2 роки тому +9

      Today’s animals are also abominations, we are just too used to them. Imagine seeing an elephant or a giraffe for the first time and being terrified at their abnormal appearances

  • @danielcooper3332
    @danielcooper3332 2 роки тому +10

    This is really interesting. However, if the Vortex and Porpin had evolved from Penguins they would more likely be found in the Antarctic and southern oceans rather than the Arctic circle.

  • @leviroch
    @leviroch 3 місяці тому

    My grandma was an english teacher with a massive library. I remember staying at hers as a kid and scouring through said library and finding this book. . . I attribute that moment as forming the basis for my utter adoration towards biology as a whole.
    That memory is such a fundamental aspect of the way i perceive the word as it is.

  • @davidlie3103
    @davidlie3103 2 роки тому +50

    Extremely underrated hope this got more views

  • @minestar2247
    @minestar2247 2 роки тому +9

    After man, even the title is an art form ,there should be a best title award

  • @KaptainKuba
    @KaptainKuba 2 роки тому +1

    I am officially obsessed with this channel

  • @mayhewstorm1473
    @mayhewstorm1473 2 місяці тому

    I love like ALL your speculative biology videos. I always want them to be longer lol

  • @violetlight1548
    @violetlight1548 2 роки тому +3

    I absolutely LOVE this book! I was so excited to find a copy on Ebay! Dougal Dixon created such a cool genre!

  • @roblamb8327
    @roblamb8327 2 роки тому +9

    Interesting, very interesting. Thanks for posting it.
    But it would be interesting to know the climatic and environmental conditions assumed for these evolutions; also possible deviations based on different changes.
    Subbed to see if you consider this as a future topic.

  • @AnAmbientGrey
    @AnAmbientGrey 2 роки тому +1

    I discovered a copy of this book in my nan's house in the early 2000's and thought it was the coolest, most inspired thing I'd ever seen

  • @saphiregoji9652
    @saphiregoji9652 2 роки тому +3

    3:03 im happy this isn't how sonic looked like
    But man he be evolving

  • @Sloth_Guy_Alex
    @Sloth_Guy_Alex 2 роки тому +6

    8:55 *🎵🎶LIFE COULD BE A DREAM, LIFE COULD BE A DREEEEAM🎶🎵*

  • @redeye4516
    @redeye4516 2 роки тому +17

    All this speculative zoology reminds me of a creepypasta I read back in middle school. The government had some secret program where they left a bunch of animals and plants to evolve in a space station with zero gravity. Wolves became parasites latching onto trees, rabbits grew into predators that swam through the air and had large bug eyes on top of their heads, trees and plant life grew all over the place. It was written as horror and the protagonist blew it up and then cried in his spaceship IIRC.
    Today, this is stuff is not horror, but a hobby and source of memes. It's like this "creepy" video I saw from 2009 called "who wants to gnaw on human bones" that's basically just the same as the average shitpost now. In fact, it's being treated as one now.

    • @VincentEdelstein
      @VincentEdelstein 2 роки тому +1

      Woah what’s it called I wanna read it?

    • @redeye4516
      @redeye4516 2 роки тому +1

      +Wtf Am I Doing
      I don't remember tbh, it's been years. It's probably still there, unless the site was shut down without my knowledge between then and now. I'll try to find it anyways, but you may have luck finding it first with my busy schedule.

  • @Anotherprickwithanopinion
    @Anotherprickwithanopinion 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for introducing me to this amazing genre

  • @paradiseviews1533
    @paradiseviews1533 2 роки тому

    This was a good thoughtful list, I like how it's not out of the realms of possibilities.

  • @Anna-po1sb
    @Anna-po1sb 2 роки тому +10

    The giant rat actually reminds me of the Thylocene, its gone full circle xD

  • @lgjosad
    @lgjosad 2 роки тому +3

    I have his book for about 15 years. Amazing!

  • @urphakeandgey6308
    @urphakeandgey6308 2 роки тому +1

    I love All Tomorrows because it starts off rather dark, but ends with the rather positive message of "Love Today and Sieze All Tomorrows."

  • @FabianoTAzevedo
    @FabianoTAzevedo 2 роки тому

    The chance of each of these species evolve that very way is one in millions, yet nice speculative ideas.

  • @furanafriendszuentertainme2785
    @furanafriendszuentertainme2785 2 роки тому +8

    I actually have After Man
    I always loved looking at how animals would look like in the future.
    I was also thinking of drawing them in my own style.

  • @ancientgamer246
    @ancientgamer246 2 роки тому +4

    That Desert Leaper looked cute as hell and now I want one.

  • @bluespruce786
    @bluespruce786 2 роки тому

    My biology teacher waaaay back in highschool loved this book! Wo, I looked for it a few times but never found a copy to buy. Great video, thanks for posting!

  • @morebootylessheadhaches
    @morebootylessheadhaches 2 роки тому

    Thanx bro! This is supercool! Great inspiration!

  • @AzraelAngel945
    @AzraelAngel945 2 роки тому +7

    This deserves more views

    • @CuriousArchive
      @CuriousArchive  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks!

    • @nugrahadwianggoro
      @nugrahadwianggoro 2 роки тому

      @@CuriousArchive does Douglas mention another highly intelligent being that would replace humans in the speculative zoology? Agree, this deserve more views!

  • @revcrow7154
    @revcrow7154 2 роки тому +4

    6:49 Rootsucker looks exactly like a Pink armadillo. Smallest of the species and probably the oldest still existing

  • @no_one01-5
    @no_one01-5 2 роки тому

    I remember reading this back in elementary school. It was always my favourite.

  • @mkmnll7456
    @mkmnll7456 2 роки тому

    I had that book when I was a kid!!!! So many flashbacks, I loved it!

  • @LensBlurr
    @LensBlurr 2 роки тому +4

    50 million years into the future... The dogs have become the world's most intelligent lifeform and they are working hard to collect human bones, studying its history and displaying it to their museums. Some dog archeologists even named us the dog's best friend saying how helpful we were back in the days where they had us not just a pet but a companion.

  • @noxoltherat4194
    @noxoltherat4194 2 роки тому +8

    Thanks to this video, for the first time in my life I’m asking for books from my parents.
    I’m gonna have the time of my life when showing these books to my friends at middle school
    : D

    • @loturzelrestaurant
      @loturzelrestaurant 2 роки тому +3

      I thought this channel's comment-section/s, if any place,
      would have smarteristic and smarttastic people.
      So i wanted to ask your opinion of a Project of mine,
      trying to help youtube help itself - getting it to become less
      of what can only be described as 'Messy' without wanting
      to use hard swearing...
      P0rn, Racism, Sexism, Scam, Spam-Bots, P0rn-Spam-Bots
      and much more. Oh, and of course the new Kid in Town:
      The Covid-Denier/Mask-Hater.
      All of them are non-subtle (some more than others)
      and therefore easy to find.
      I used the reportbutton as it was originally intended;
      not as Cancel-Culture but to help.
      Just this week, i got 1 Covid-Denier-Channel (yes, the entire thing,
      not just 1 video) and 2 Open Racists (Users, not UA-camrs) removed.
      And this feels good.
      No, its not a 'Wonder-Miracle-Solution!!', but who needs that? Do you need that?
      If so, ok, i dont have anything for you.
      Yet, i feel confident about this enough to ask: Wanna join the Fun? The helping?
      Both?

    • @noxoltherat4194
      @noxoltherat4194 2 роки тому +1

      @@loturzelrestaurant I would honestly love to, but I’m 11 XD
      And unfortunately I don’t know enough about the topic to help or participate. I do love your idea though. I hope you the absolute best in making your project!!! Tysm for the offer, but no ty

    • @loturzelrestaurant
      @loturzelrestaurant 2 роки тому +3

      @@noxoltherat4194 Dont worry, Mr.Mac-Rat.
      At 11 years old, you should indeed not try to find weird and s-ual stuff,
      but that does not make your Options drop to 0.
      Not Zero, no.

    • @noxoltherat4194
      @noxoltherat4194 2 роки тому +3

      @@loturzelrestaurant I can 100% help with reporting the Anti-maskers and Covid-deniers! I think I will join, tysm for offering this to me and bringing it to my attention! I’m in

    • @loturzelrestaurant
      @loturzelrestaurant 2 роки тому +2

      @@noxoltherat4194
      I mean, those dumb videos for dumb people about a 'Russian Guy Gropes 1000 Boobies!!' is probably not so intense that you couldnt real quick go there and report it and then leave,
      but ok, i get it.
      Totally fine and understandable to not want to deal with that Nonsense.
      But what about 'Harald TV'?
      If you check his channel with exact 4 Videos out, you will see from the Like-Dislike-Ratio alone that he's... toxic... and the comment-section will prove even more that he's absolutely funny-in-the-head.
      Check him out.

  • @elijahclark6093
    @elijahclark6093 2 роки тому +1

    I have the book After man. I loved it as a kid. Super glad this video was suggested to me

  • @smoceany9478
    @smoceany9478 10 місяців тому +1

    guy: so what will the future be like
    dixon: small get big

  • @Gleann
    @Gleann 2 роки тому +3

    I actually owned this book when I was a kid. Some of the animal concepts are wild!

  • @rap7771
    @rap7771 2 роки тому +3

    "I'm glad there's no wolf sized rats today"
    Just go to New York bro

  • @ThomasMHead
    @ThomasMHead 2 роки тому +1

    I still have my childhood copy. So intriguing and imagination-sparking.

  • @wheelsofmercury
    @wheelsofmercury 2 роки тому +1

    Quite a fascinating video.

  • @dank_smirk2ndchannel200
    @dank_smirk2ndchannel200 8 місяців тому +3

    8:06 who would have guessed that this whole time, while humans wished to return to monke, monkes wished to return to dino.

  • @jasonsanders8797
    @jasonsanders8797 2 роки тому +3

    I've never seen or read this book, but I feel like it should have a section about how cockroaches and horse-shoe crabs still haven't changed.

  • @OGbluetooth_
    @OGbluetooth_ 2 роки тому

    Never been here before but the narration was really nice on this one!

  • @mrchrisdavis09
    @mrchrisdavis09 2 роки тому

    I had this book as a kid. Great stuff!

  • @hil449
    @hil449 2 роки тому +3

    8:25 these are NOT baboons

  • @garganrose
    @garganrose 2 роки тому +5

    So Wayne Barlowe Dogal Dixon and C.M. Cosman are basically the holy Trinity of speculative evolution.

  • @gomezgarciaeduardoi.4165
    @gomezgarciaeduardoi.4165 2 роки тому +1

    I have a Book of The year 1982 that has a mention to this exactly book, looks so interesting the HUGE variety of models that the animal kingdom has to show.

  • @g.k.5165
    @g.k.5165 2 роки тому +2

    •Shows a picture about Dixon•
    *Have you ever wonder what’s going on in their head?*
    1:07 1:48 2:08 3:03 3:34 3:50 4:26 4:50 5:16 6:01

  • @AdamEmond
    @AdamEmond 2 роки тому +4

    There are no penguins in the northern hemisphere, let alone the arctic.
    That's quite a speculation.

  • @easytiger6570
    @easytiger6570 2 роки тому +7

    5:28 Aquatic dinosaurs back on the menu boys

  • @Jherick5954
    @Jherick5954 2 роки тому

    i like to randomly think about stuff like this. But I very rarely bring it up because it's an "out there" topic. Maybe im just overthinking it. im glad there's a video for it :)

  • @Kleineganz
    @Kleineganz 7 місяців тому

    I remember this book. I read it as a teen back in the 1980s. I always loved the fanciful animals he came up with.

  • @123cityperson
    @123cityperson 2 роки тому +6

    finally, someone talks about it

  • @FrostyFoxDrake
    @FrostyFoxDrake 2 роки тому +8

    It’s interesting to see Dixon’s speculations, especially how he (and a lot of people at that time) didn’t realize that we as a species could have such a profoundly detrimental impact on our environment. I think, given that were this post-human earth, most modern animals wouldn’t be able to inhabit the polluted world we’ll leave behind, and just go extinct

    • @IgnisDomini97
      @IgnisDomini97 2 роки тому +3

      I mean, why do you think almost all the animals here are descended from small animals like rats, bats, rabbits, etc.? All the big ones went extinct.

    • @monstermaker73
      @monstermaker73 2 роки тому +2

      I suppose that is just the depressing undertone of his species, yet he still manages to realize that life will go on.
      And it makes sense that all current megafaunal creatures would go extinct based on Dougal Dixon's thesis; overhunting, rapid climate change, and habitat instability/depletion would be their undoing.

  • @zomatsi8161
    @zomatsi8161 6 місяців тому +1

    6:03 i heard him trying to hold in his laugh lol

  • @Skanking-Corpse
    @Skanking-Corpse 8 днів тому

    So this unlocked a memory for me. I'm 43, and as a very little kid I clearly remember watching a show on what I think was the Discovery channel that had the Night Stalker featured in it. I remember that a full sized model was made as well and it was a truly weird and terrifying thing to see. Does anyone else remember seeing this? Maybe you could direct me to what show it was.

  • @angelique7618
    @angelique7618 2 роки тому +6

    I absolutely love this channel. In saying so, I have seen large bullfrog eat medium size rats, rabbits and other large frogs.

    • @fionagibson7529
      @fionagibson7529 Рік тому

      You would probably be interested in beelzebufo, an extinct frog probably about the size of a chihuahua that is thought to have eaten baby dinosaurs.

  • @kfcroc18
    @kfcroc18 2 роки тому +3

    Thats not a baboon. 8:15

  • @exiverence
    @exiverence 2 роки тому +1

    I thought it was cool that you gave a nod to “the future is wild” I remember I saw that as a kid and was floored by it

  • @NanobanaKinako
    @NanobanaKinako 8 місяців тому +2

    The last animal looks so cute. I want that as my pet.