Alhamdulillah. I am so glad the Shaykh chose to speak on this topic. There are some sunni Muslims who misunderstand and regard the Imams of the Ahl Al-Bayt as being totally different from Ahl As-sunnah. The truth is that they were great scholars and jurists of their time and some of the biggest sunni scholars were their students.
Yet you as sunnis have nothing transmitted from them except very suspiciously only statements from them where they praise Abu Bakr and Umar. Stop deceiving yourself, they taught shia doctrines and shia fiqh, they weren't part of sunni islam.
Masha'Allah, love this scholar, as someone born into the Shia fiqh. He does not shy away from the issues but explains them in a very respectful manner. Scholars on all sides could and should learn this manner insha'Allah. Maybe there would be less turmoil within the ummah❤
Top lecture. Words of gold and light in a time of suffocating darkness. Remember these words of the lecturer: OUR RELIGION IS DIVINE, OUR HISTORY IS HUMAN.
May Allah be pleased with the shaykh for actually talking about a person and topic that almost never gets talked about by ahlus sunnah other than in passing. At least not in my lifetime ans circles. alhamdulillah i am ahlus sunnah. Imam Jafar was a great imam and slave of Allah and I consider him no less than the 4 mazhab imams. May Allah be pleased with them all and grant them his mercy and blessings. Allahumme Ãmîn
Walaikumusalaam Wa rahmatullahi Wa barakahatuhu Thank you for sharing these details about early Islamic history. The details of how Jafar As Sadiq’s character influenced how he was respected and honored is commendable and emphasizes our deen’s emphasis on exemplifying our ritualistic practices and manners for a positive change in society in sha Allah. Jazakum Allahu khairun Barak Allahu Feekum, Aameen Assalaamualaikum Wa rahmatullahi Wa barakahatuhu
Sheikh please keep your lectures as long as informative and as comprehensive as possible, you have already established your reputation and student base We want to learn from you ancient,medieval and modern view points , you dont confuse at all , we can clearly understand you and do them as often as possible
Tabaarakallaah. Jazakillaah khairan Ust for the knowledge on our precious scholars n ahlul bait. Muslims are united under Alquran n Sunnah Rasulullah s.a.w. aameen
Another amazingly informative and beneficial lecture in such a short time. Sheikh’s lectures are always very well researched and eloquently putted together. Jazak Allah
Asalam alaikum sheikh and thank you for a wonderfull lecture on Ja'far-as-Sadiq. Islamic history is a wide subject and this glimpse on one subject has given me some understanding of what went on at that time.☘
@suuahmed71 The Shia agree ofcourse. Unlike fictional characters that Sunnis created Mohammad Ibn Abu Bakr had a role in Islamic History. Jafar Al Sadiq AS is his descendent. But what difference does that make to anything ?
@@Warlock786Even the so called by blood was on his mother side. It is over exaggerated. Muhammad Ibn Abu Bakar was staunch shia who fought against his own sister at Jamal. He did not accept his father as his Imam he gave his bayah to his step father Imam Ali. RasoolAllah (sawa) said, “The lineage of every mother’s children is attributed to their father except for Fatimah’s children. So I am their guardian and I am their lineage.” Imam Sadiq paternal lineage is through Imam Ali & Fatimah that is the one that counts as per the Hadith of RasoolAllah. But propagandist for Abu Bakar will neglect this.
Imams are chosen by Allah until today and there will always be imams in future as mentioned by Prophet PBUH, I am leaving behind two weighty things, Quran and my progeny. If you will hold on to both of them, you will never go astray. Sunnis are only holding on to Quran but not the interpreter of Quran which is Ali PBUH. May Allah guide everyone to seek truth. I would encourage everyone to try and understand the notion of imamat from Quran yourself.
Muhammad bin abubakar was real shia of Ali, this is the person who fought the battle against his sister Aiysha in the war of Jamal. He was always remained Ali's side.
Sahih al-Bukhari 7198 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Ællāh never sends a prophet or gives the Caliphate to a Caliph but that he (the prophet or the Caliph) has two groups of advisors: A group advising him to do good and exhorts him to do it, and the other group advising him to do evil and exhorts him to do it. The infallible is from the infallibility of Ællāh Ta’ala فَالْمَعْصُومُ مَنْ عَصَمَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى Incapable of making mistakes or being wrong, the infallible can’t sin, so tell me who are these twelve again? These caliphs are have level of perfection of the prophets but who could they be? Again this can be found in the Shi’a belief that holds all the twelve caliphs to be مَعْصُومُ - infallible. Please check the Arabic for مَعْصُومُ is clearly mentioned but perhaps translations may be biased, anyhow it is there. At least now can we agree on this?
My beloved sheikh If I am opportune to be part of your masjid ie EPIC truly my worldly desires are achieved InshaAllah ❤️❤️❤️❤️ Please pray for me let my wish come true
Sheikh please make a 12 part playlist of all Islamic months and what to do and what not to do in them , the etymology of Islamic months , the sunnahs and bidah , so to crystal clear it once and for all
Muhammed ibn abu bakr was a loyal companion of Imam Ali (as). He loved Ali and fought many battles with him. He was also involved in the battle of jamal where he fought on the side of Ali against his Biological sister and wife of the prophet Aisha. He was the one who escorted Aisha at the end of the battle after her camel was arrowed down. Nobody in the Sunni world like to talk about these facts but would rather just point to his father who he had no relationship with due to his birth following his father death. Please sheikh if you want to discuss these things then please give full context. Muhammed ibn abi bakr offspring were loyal supporters of the ahlul bayt and hence their Taqwa/deen was the reason for marriage and not bloodline.
Thank you for amazing knowledge you are sharing and great history of Islam. Will you please speak about Mouloy Idris II buried in Fez of Morocco Appreciate it 🙏🏻
Interesting. In Sunni Islam why isn’t their a jaffar fiqh or school of thought since he knew imam malik and Abu hanifah and he out manoeuvered Abu hanifah in he’s questioning which isn’t an easy thing to do??????
Because currently Sunni fiqh is hijacked by najdis and hopefully one day we shall have it soon. The worst humans currently are najdis that internally have animosity against family of the Prophet (saw) and due to them mainstream Sunni Islam is kinda lost especially in west. Thanks to Shaik Yasir Qadhi who couple of years ago left najdi dawah and trying to revive Sunni Islam also researching on Ahlul Bayt (as). It’s unfortunate that we don’t have Jaffari Sunni fiqh
I don't understand your point, there are numerous madhahib besides the 4 that have existed such as the Zahiri, Awza'i, Laithi, Thawri, etc so why just focus on Sunnis following Jafar As-Sadiq specifically? Abdur Rahman Al-Awza'i was considered as great a scholar as anyone, had a madhab but his madhab just simply replaced overtime by the Malikis because one of the rulers of the land preferred Maliki fiqh. The rulers chose the madhab of the lands and the schools in that area would teach that fish. Overtime, 4 out of the many madhahib became dominant. Nothing more nothing less, anywhere discussion beyond this then a person is probably seeking fitnah or is possibly Shia. Because you seem concerned ONLY with us Sunnis not following the madhab of Jafar which is claimed by the Rafidah today but don't seem to care about or know about the fiqh of Dawud Az-Zahiri, Layth ibm Sa'ad, Imam Al-Awza'i, etc. Even Imam At-Tabarani had his own madhab but you don't ask about those scholars and only focus on Sunnis taking Jafar's fiqh for some reasons.
@@Harun-cd6jzYou don't want understand his point because you are a nasibi. You belittle Imam Sadiq in your fitna to other fiqh's. There is a damn good considering even in Sunni sources Imam Abu Hanifa & Imam Malik all praised studying under Imam Sadiq no matter what spin you put on it. The fact all 4 Sunni madhab gained knowledge from him directly or indirectly leads to the question why didn't the Sunni take his fiqh. It clear he was shi'a taking his fiqh would lead others to take more from him.
Excuse me? What? Ummayds brutally killed zaid's army and desecrated his body and this guy says, it is what it is?! No condemnation? No, you're supporting imam Jafar Sadiq because he didn't take part in the revolt. He's a clean figure for you to own. Just a scholar who never participated in politics. It's people like you who have brought the ummah to its collapse. Just pray namaz, do scholarly stuff, and leave the politics to politicians. You've made me so angry! Prophet Muhammad pbuh was a politician! So I curse your empty, vain rhetorics. You guys can never be honest with Ahl e Bayt. Maybe the shiias are right about you people after all.
A little correction sheikh: 1. Imam Jafar's mother was not Fathimah, but Ummu Farwa bint Al Qasim ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr. Fathimah bint Al Hasan Al mutsanna was the mother of imam Muhammad al Baqir. 2. Abu Bakr As Siddiq didnt die before Muhammad was born. He died two years after Muhammad was born. Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr was born on the day of Arafah 10 H.
Abasid Dynasty was not established by Mansur but by Abumuslim Khorasani, leader of musavadah ( black attired) who installed Mansur and was killed by him!
I’ve heard a Hadith that at the end of time, there will be from from the descendants of Muhammad pbuh a man named Muhammad son of Abdullah, and if you’re alive at that time you should swear allegiance to him even if you have to crawl upon ice. How will we know who the descendants of the Prophet pbuh are?
Likely this is Mahdi AS who comes after the Malhamma Kubra (like WW3) and will likely be of the only arab leaders against the zionists (who at that time are even more powerful than now and are about to summon/ rally with Dajjal) We should pray to never see those very difficult times but if we do know it will be the only if not one of the only leaders against the zionists.
The fiqh of Imam Jafar as Sadiq (as) is different from the Sunni fiqh, the Shiites follow the fiqh and the school of Jafar as Sadiq (as). As for the belief on different aspects of the religion is even more different from the Sunni belief. A significant number of hadiths from Shia books come from Imam Jafar as Sadiq(as). Imam Jafar as Sadiq(as) criticized the positions of Abu Hanifa and Malik.
Sunni and shia depends on aqeeda not on deed. Moreover jaffari fiqh is not preserved till now. The shia version of jaffaru fiqh is completely corrupted by later shia according to their desire
Of course you can follow it brother. If his fiqh has been corrupted, who today follows his preserved fiqh then? Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafi or Humble... none of these scholars are higher in rank than Jafar as Sadiq. If sunni imams were the students of Jafar As Sadiq, then why don't you follow the master? Please, don't let sectarianism and anti-shia hatred corrupt you. Stay safe
@@AnwarHossain-ej4mdThat just your sectarian false allegations. If they took Imam Sadiq fiqh then would have to take his aqeedah. Even caliphs of his time recognizes him as the Imam of the shi'a. Think they knew more than you
Divine appointment of leaders is the Sunnah of Islam. There is no example in the Quran of a non-prophet or prophet appointed by the people. Even non-prophet leaders are appointed by God And no, the Imams do not have ‘special powers’ or ‘divinity’ in Shia theology.
The Prophet did not leave us without a waseeyya for after his death. He named his appointee (upon the command of Allah) as one would expect a leader to do
Shiaatu Ali (shia) is not a religion but a group of people considered followers of Ali practicing Islam with some differences than the four Sunni schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Hanbali, and Wahabi).
Why Ali gave indemnity to the Killer f Usman? Why Usman was burried in the Jewish Graveyards? Why Ali took Bayah from those who actively were related to dethrone Usman?
@Smart61able 0 seconds ago Salaam alaiku Sheikh, Thanks for putting light on the personality of Imam Jaffer Sadiq (as). I would like to point few things which needs to be pointed out. Unfortunately Sheikh you had not done justice historical fact, Imam Husain (as) didn’t uprise with an army he was moving towards Kufa, upon the invitation from the people of Kufa to guide them, with families and friends, ladies and children’s including infants and elderly, not more than 125 people, not an army. Sheikh you alludes toward similarities between the uprising of Zaid with an army of 15,000 as same as Imam Husain (as) move towards Kufa. Which is historical wrong. Imam Husain didn’t go with army. Would appreciate your response. Also Sheikh mentions about Muhammad bin Abu Bakr, born an orphane, without mentioned that Muhammad bin Abubakr was brought up by Imam Ali (as). Also it should be mentioned that in the battle of Jamal between Imam Ali (as), the Khalifa of the time, against rebellious army led by Aisha, Talha and Zuber, which resulted in massacres and death of thousands. Upon the defeat of rebellion power, Imam Ali (as) commanded Muhammad bin Abubakr, one of Imam Ali’s most loyal commander, to take command of the group who shall in all honor and respect take his sister Aisha back to Medina.
1. Why does the shaykh not refer to Abu Hanifa as Imam Abu Hanifa as he does with Imam Malik (rightly so) 2. What's the source and authenticity of the story he cites regarding Imam Abu hanifa in the palace with Imam Jafar?
This lecture serms to imply that the Ahlul bayt and their followers are all Shia. But the Chisti order of Sufism was founded by Hazrat Moinuddin Chisti of Ajmer who was of the Ahlul bayt and his family is Sunni. And while they don't have supernatural powers, they do possess mystical knowledge of the Quran that they don't share with any outsider and is keot secret even within the family. I can confirm this because my mother's family are Syeds of India
No one believe this. We’re not Christians who keep “original bible” among the “popes”. The Prophet was sent to convey Islam, and he perfected his job and will testify as such in the Day of Judgement. Whatever they thought they’re hiding is just a cult and what we need to know about Islam had already been preserved by Allah swt through the Prophet Muhammad saw
I tried reach you by phone by no return call. before taking this big task you must have looked into different parts of history. Anis died in year 702 and that year Imam jafer sadiq born. Muhammad bin Abu baker was born before the death of the prophet. and he is sahabi. Muhammad bin Abu Baker was like the son to Ali as Ali married to his mother after the death of Abu baker.
You mentioned in your seerah that abubakar had a daughter, who was born after his death. You said that abubakar advised on his death bed to Ayesha that look after your sister as he thought that he was going to have a daughter and he had a daughter who was born after his death 🤔
No, he's not, read on your own. You will realize that he's only protecting his sect. Kindly read on your own. Palestine war and Hizbullah interference has forced these sheikhs to talk about Ahle Bait. Finally.
Shi'a is not a sect, it is a term used by the Qur'an, along with Muslim and Mu'min: And most surely Abraham was among the Shi’a of him (i.e., Noah)”(Qur’an 37:83) وَإِنَّ مِن شِيعَتِهِ لَإِبْرَاهِيمَ : ٨٣ In another verse, Qur’an talks about the Shi’a of Moses versus the enemies of Moses: "And he (Moses) went into the city at a time when people (of the city) were not watching, so he found therein two men fighting, one being of his Shi’a and the other beinghis enemy, and the one who was of his Shi’a cried out to him for help against the one who was of his enemy”(Qur’an 28:15) فَوَجَدَ فِيهَا رَجُلَيْنِ يَقْتَتِلَانِ هَـٰذَا مِن شِيعَتِهِ وَهَـٰذَا مِنْ عَدُوِّهِ ۖفَاسْتَغَاثَهُ الَّذِي مِن شِيعَتِهِ عَلَى الَّذِي مِنْ عَدُوِّهِ...
The Shiites are supporters of the Imams of Ahl al bayt (as) whom they consider as their guides. The supporters of Imam Jafar as Sadiq(as) are his Shiites, this is the meaning of the word Shiite.
What i always got with Yasser Qadhi is because he moved from an extremist takfiri wahabbi over the years to wanting to be seen as a more academic athari he gives a bit of honesty just a bit. He still blatantly misleads with his own biased in what he calls factual for his own biased narrative. He taking from sunni sources not shi'i. It is complete false when he claims they weren't known as shia leaders even the caliphs knew they claimed Imamate i.e their oppression & imprisonment. When Imam Redha was asked by Haroon Rashid what is the ahlulbayt evidence for imamate he knew he was the shi'a imam. There is no doubt that is factual not his polemics. Certainly their closet shia companions saw them as their leaders. He not talking factual when he says they didn't claim this or that. Certain things they couldn't openly say or they would be killed. It isn't rocket science. But their close companions knew who they truly were. This easy polemical dig when knowing vulnerable situation what they couldn't say openly. Okay there was some development to come later on as with sunni faith but shia of Ali existed back in the time of RasoolAllah based on hadith. Certainly in the time of Muawiyah. While others might have not known their true status those that kept the faith alive did. He can't whitewash it as all coming later.
Alhamdulillah. I am so glad the Shaykh chose to speak on this topic. There are some sunni Muslims who misunderstand and regard the Imams of the Ahl Al-Bayt as being totally different from Ahl As-sunnah. The truth is that they were great scholars and jurists of their time and some of the biggest sunni scholars were their students.
Yet you as sunnis have nothing transmitted from them except very suspiciously only statements from them where they praise Abu Bakr and Umar. Stop deceiving yourself, they taught shia doctrines and shia fiqh, they weren't part of sunni islam.
Masha'Allah, love this scholar, as someone born into the Shia fiqh. He does not shy away from the issues but explains them in a very respectful manner. Scholars on all sides could and should learn this manner insha'Allah. Maybe there would be less turmoil within the ummah❤
I love these early Islam sessions plz do more and more regularly
You can do your own homework too. Just need some time and patience!
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ He never lied Masha ALLAH.
Lectures of this learned Sheykh are valuable lessons to know more about Islamic history in an unbiased way .
My dear brother, Shaykh Dr Yasir Qadhi, I pray to ALLAH that you are admitted to Jannah - Aameen ❤❤❤❤
Peace and blessings of Allah be upon Imam Jaffar as Sadiq (as)
Allahumma Sali 3ala Muhammad wa aali Muhammad
This is enough to support the shi'i position of who most accurately carries on the Prophet's legacy.
Top lecture. Words of gold and light in a time of suffocating darkness. Remember these words of the lecturer:
OUR RELIGION IS DIVINE, OUR HISTORY IS HUMAN.
May Allah bless you sheikh. Would love to hear more about the Sunni perspective on our Imams (AS) 😊
We love you Dr Qadhi for loving Jafar as Sadiq. Great impartial history lesson.
May Allah be pleased with the shaykh for actually talking about a person and topic that almost never gets talked about by ahlus sunnah other than in passing. At least not in my lifetime ans circles. alhamdulillah i am ahlus sunnah. Imam Jafar was a great imam and slave of Allah and I consider him no less than the 4 mazhab imams. May Allah be pleased with them all and grant them his mercy and blessings. Allahumme Ãmîn
Sheikh is the best history teller I have ever seen. Ma sha Allah, may Allah bless him
MaShaAllah, well researched and well delivered, open minded and balanced introduction.
May Allah bless you Sheikh
Mashallah . Al-Hamdulillah for the history .
😮
Jazakallah khair
MashaAllah. Good lectur on Imam Jaffer As Saqiq As.Allah bless you.
Alhamdulillah. This cleared a many confusions
Walaikumusalaam
Wa rahmatullahi
Wa barakahatuhu
Thank you for sharing these details about early Islamic history. The details of how Jafar As Sadiq’s character influenced how he was respected and honored is commendable and emphasizes our deen’s emphasis on exemplifying our ritualistic practices and manners for a positive change in society in sha Allah.
Jazakum Allahu khairun
Barak Allahu Feekum, Aameen
Assalaamualaikum
Wa rahmatullahi
Wa barakahatuhu
Sheikh please keep your lectures as long as informative and as comprehensive as possible, you have already established your reputation and student base
We want to learn from you ancient,medieval and modern view points , you dont confuse at all , we can clearly understand you and do them as often as possible
Tabaarakallaah. Jazakillaah khairan Ust for the knowledge on our precious scholars n ahlul bait. Muslims are united under Alquran n Sunnah Rasulullah s.a.w. aameen
Always topclass talks by Sheikh
Lots of information i gathered from this lecture. Masaallah.
Alhamdolillah for this.
JazakAllah Khayr! Always learn such great history lessons from Sheikh Yasir
Masha Allah
Another amazingly informative and beneficial lecture in such a short time. Sheikh’s lectures are always very well researched and eloquently putted together. Jazak Allah
This is so much wanted narration ❤ Alhamdulillah
Jazak Allahu khairan kaseeran
MasyaAllah
Well said
Jazakallahu Khairan Sheikh!❤
Sadakta. Astounding lecture, informative and engaging ❤
ماشاءاللہ شیخ
Nice to see the Sunnis coming back to Ahlul Bayth as the Prophet PBUH commanded.
Very hard to see a Sunni scholar open up about the real history like this! May Allah protect you and add to your knowledge - Ameen.
Jazaaka Allah 🙏
jazaakumullahu kheiran
Asalam alaikum sheikh and thank you for a wonderfull lecture on Ja'far-as-Sadiq. Islamic history is a wide subject and this glimpse on one subject has given me some understanding of what went on at that time.☘
Excellent lecture
Great video keep it up you're doing amazing things 😁👍
❤
Very informative
Precise
Can forward this information.
You nailed it! 👏
Sayyidina Jafar(ra) decendant of Sayyidina Abu Bakr(ra)💕💕💕
Only by Blood. Raised by Ahlul Bayth and descendent of our Holy Prophet PBUH..that's more important.
Do the Shia agrees with this?? They will say no its not true as they don't agree that Sydna Umar married saydna Ally bin Abu Twalib's duaghter
@suuahmed71 The Shia agree ofcourse. Unlike fictional characters that Sunnis created Mohammad Ibn Abu Bakr had a role in Islamic History. Jafar Al Sadiq AS is his descendent. But what difference does that make to anything ?
@@Warlock786Even the so called by blood was on his mother side. It is over exaggerated.
Muhammad Ibn Abu Bakar was staunch shia who fought against his own sister at Jamal. He did not accept his father as his Imam he gave his bayah to his step father Imam Ali.
RasoolAllah (sawa) said, “The lineage of every mother’s children is attributed to their father except for Fatimah’s children. So I am their guardian and I am their lineage.”
Imam Sadiq paternal lineage is through Imam Ali & Fatimah that is the one that counts as per the Hadith of RasoolAllah.
But propagandist for Abu Bakar will neglect this.
Allah❤
Free Palestine
This is important lecture
FROM H*****S
Imams are chosen by Allah until today and there will always be imams in future as mentioned by Prophet PBUH, I am leaving behind two weighty things, Quran and my progeny. If you will hold on to both of them, you will never go astray. Sunnis are only holding on to Quran but not the interpreter of Quran which is Ali PBUH. May Allah guide everyone to seek truth. I would encourage everyone to try and understand the notion of imamat from Quran yourself.
May Allah ﷻ unite the Muslims and disunite the kuffar
no not disunite anyone.
alhamduallah
Muhammad bin abubakar was real shia of Ali, this is the person who fought the battle against his sister Aiysha in the war of Jamal. He was always remained Ali's side.
Sahih al-Bukhari 7198
Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Ællāh never sends a prophet or gives the Caliphate to a Caliph but that he (the prophet or the Caliph) has two groups of advisors: A group advising him to do good and exhorts him to do it, and the other group advising him to do evil and exhorts him to do it. The infallible is from the infallibility of Ællāh Ta’ala
فَالْمَعْصُومُ مَنْ عَصَمَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى
Incapable of making mistakes or being wrong, the infallible can’t sin, so tell me who are these twelve again? These caliphs are have level of perfection of the prophets but who could they be?
Again this can be found in the Shi’a belief that holds all the twelve caliphs to be مَعْصُومُ - infallible.
Please check the Arabic for مَعْصُومُ is clearly mentioned but perhaps translations may be biased, anyhow it is there. At least now can we agree on this?
Other Shi'a will also give the same argument.
Subhan Allah great history and the depth of Muslim oppression, not Islam, of course. But the advent of Jafar Sadiq to ibu Hanifa and imam Malik
My beloved sheikh
If I am opportune to be part of your masjid ie EPIC truly my worldly desires are achieved InshaAllah ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Please pray for me let my wish come true
Muhammad bin abu bakr born during last Hajj of the prophet
Sheikh please make a 12 part playlist of all Islamic months and what to do and what not to do in them , the etymology of Islamic months , the sunnahs and bidah , so to crystal clear it once and for all
Muhammed ibn abu bakr was a loyal companion of Imam Ali (as). He loved Ali and fought many battles with him. He was also involved in the battle of jamal where he fought on the side of Ali against his Biological sister and wife of the prophet Aisha. He was the one who escorted Aisha at the end of the battle after her camel was arrowed down. Nobody in the Sunni world like to talk about these facts but would rather just point to his father who he had no relationship with due to his birth following his father death. Please sheikh if you want to discuss these things then please give full context. Muhammed ibn abi bakr offspring were loyal supporters of the ahlul bayt and hence their Taqwa/deen was the reason for marriage and not bloodline.
❤❤❤
We would like to hear more history from you😊
We want more videos in this manner.
❤
Thank you for amazing knowledge you are sharing and great history of Islam. Will you please speak about Mouloy Idris II buried in Fez of Morocco
Appreciate it 🙏🏻
Interesting. In Sunni Islam why isn’t their a jaffar fiqh or school of thought since he knew imam malik and Abu hanifah and he out manoeuvered Abu hanifah in he’s questioning which isn’t an easy thing to do??????
Because currently Sunni fiqh is hijacked by najdis and hopefully one day we shall have it soon. The worst humans currently are najdis that internally have animosity against family of the Prophet (saw) and due to them mainstream Sunni Islam is kinda lost especially in west. Thanks to Shaik Yasir Qadhi who couple of years ago left najdi dawah and trying to revive Sunni Islam also researching on Ahlul Bayt (as). It’s unfortunate that we don’t have Jaffari Sunni fiqh
why do you think, he didn't curse the sahaba unlike the rawafidh?
I don't understand your point, there are numerous madhahib besides the 4 that have existed such as the Zahiri, Awza'i, Laithi, Thawri, etc so why just focus on Sunnis following Jafar As-Sadiq specifically?
Abdur Rahman Al-Awza'i was considered as great a scholar as anyone, had a madhab but his madhab just simply replaced overtime by the Malikis because one of the rulers of the land preferred Maliki fiqh.
The rulers chose the madhab of the lands and the schools in that area would teach that fish. Overtime, 4 out of the many madhahib became dominant. Nothing more nothing less, anywhere discussion beyond this then a person is probably seeking fitnah or is possibly Shia.
Because you seem concerned ONLY with us Sunnis not following the madhab of Jafar which is claimed by the Rafidah today but don't seem to care about or know about the fiqh of Dawud Az-Zahiri, Layth ibm Sa'ad, Imam Al-Awza'i, etc. Even Imam At-Tabarani had his own madhab but you don't ask about those scholars and only focus on Sunnis taking Jafar's fiqh for some reasons.
@@Harun-cd6jzYou don't want understand his point because you are a nasibi. You belittle Imam Sadiq in your fitna to other fiqh's.
There is a damn good considering even in Sunni sources Imam Abu Hanifa & Imam Malik all praised studying under Imam Sadiq no matter what spin you put on it.
The fact all 4 Sunni madhab gained knowledge from him directly or indirectly leads to the question why didn't the Sunni take his fiqh.
It clear he was shi'a taking his fiqh would lead others to take more from him.
Good, fair presentation.
how may i learn about these lessons,
jaffar al sadiq is one of the most prominent ulema of Islam
Sheikh Yasir, salaam to you, please do some lectures about 4 imams
Assalamu Alaikum brother Yasir. Would you please give a lecture on qurbani in share.
Assalamoalaykom
Think there is an oversight.
Muhammad Ibn Abu Bakr waa born to Asma Bint Umais during Hajjatul Wada, so Abu Bakr did see him.
I think he said his great grandmother is born from Mohammad who was born just after AbuBakar RZ passed away...
Excuse me? What? Ummayds brutally killed zaid's army and desecrated his body and this guy says, it is what it is?!
No condemnation?
No, you're supporting imam Jafar Sadiq because he didn't take part in the revolt. He's a clean figure for you to own. Just a scholar who never participated in politics. It's people like you who have brought the ummah to its collapse. Just pray namaz, do scholarly stuff, and leave the politics to politicians. You've made me so angry! Prophet Muhammad pbuh was a politician! So I curse your empty, vain rhetorics. You guys can never be honest with Ahl e Bayt. Maybe the shiias are right about you people after all.
Imam Zaid was not the only child of Imam Husein to survive Karbala. He has daughters who survived Karbala also.
Zaynul 'Abidin Ali you meant, but yes, Husayn's daughters did survive Karbala.
A little correction sheikh:
1. Imam Jafar's mother was not Fathimah, but Ummu Farwa bint Al Qasim ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr. Fathimah bint Al Hasan Al mutsanna was the mother of imam Muhammad al Baqir.
2. Abu Bakr As Siddiq didnt die before Muhammad was born. He died two years after Muhammad was born. Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr was born on the day of Arafah 10 H.
Who is reciting the Ayah at the end of the video?
Abasid Dynasty was not established by Mansur but by Abumuslim Khorasani, leader of musavadah ( black attired) who installed Mansur and was killed by him!
Plesse include saying Radiallahu Anhum When One Muslim Speak Any Names of Companion of Holy Prophet Sallallahu Alaihi Wassalam thanks
Nice Information and history collection... Thankyou
@Yasir Qadhi - from a scholarly perspective addressing the great Imam Abu Haifa as just “ Abu Hanifa” is considered disrespectful.
Salam. Thank you for this great lecture. I think there is a little mistake, in the seerah Muhammad ibn Abubakr is the hajjatul wadaa baby, isn't he?
We ahle sunnat neglected imam of ahlul bait big time lots and lots of knowledge is missing
Can u do a lecture on harun ur rashid ?
not worthy one.
I’ve heard a Hadith that at the end of time, there will be from from the descendants of Muhammad pbuh a man named Muhammad son of Abdullah, and if you’re alive at that time you should swear allegiance to him even if you have to crawl upon ice. How will we know who the descendants of the Prophet pbuh are?
Likely this is Mahdi AS who comes after the Malhamma Kubra (like WW3) and will likely be of the only arab leaders against the zionists (who at that time are even more powerful than now and are about to summon/ rally with Dajjal)
We should pray to never see those very difficult times but if we do know it will be the only if not one of the only leaders against the zionists.
As Salaam Alaakum. Much respect, Ahki didn't have any notes, given historical information with no notes.
But I have read in a few places, that Imam Jafar as Sadiq's narrations are not considered in Hadith
The fiqh of Imam Jafar as Sadiq (as) is different from the Sunni fiqh, the Shiites follow the fiqh and the school of Jafar as Sadiq (as). As for the belief on different aspects of the religion is even more different from the Sunni belief. A significant number of hadiths from Shia books come from Imam Jafar as Sadiq(as). Imam Jafar as Sadiq(as) criticized the positions of Abu Hanifa and Malik.
Most Ummayyad leaders were not good Muslims - hence not good leaders; they were drunkards, they were extravagant and away from Islam.
So given what Sh YQ has said about Imam Jaffar's fiqh, can I follow it or borrow from it and still be called sunni?
Sunni and shia depends on aqeeda not on deed. Moreover jaffari fiqh is not preserved till now. The shia version of jaffaru fiqh is completely corrupted by later shia according to their desire
@@AnwarHossain-ej4md thanks for the reply; much appreciated
Of course you can follow it brother.
If his fiqh has been corrupted, who today follows his preserved fiqh then?
Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafi or Humble... none of these scholars are higher in rank than Jafar as Sadiq.
If sunni imams were the students of Jafar As Sadiq, then why don't you follow the master?
Please, don't let sectarianism and anti-shia hatred corrupt you.
Stay safe
If you take Imam Sadiq fiqh then why wouldn't you take his aqeedah? Even caliphs of his time recognizes him as the Imam of the shi'a.
@@AnwarHossain-ej4mdThat just your sectarian false allegations.
If they took Imam Sadiq fiqh then would have to take his aqeedah. Even caliphs of his time recognizes him as the Imam of the shi'a.
Think they knew more than you
Divine appointment of leaders is the Sunnah of Islam. There is no example in the Quran of a non-prophet or prophet appointed by the people. Even non-prophet leaders are appointed by God
And no, the Imams do not have ‘special powers’ or ‘divinity’ in Shia theology.
The Prophet did not leave us without a waseeyya for after his death. He named his appointee (upon the command of Allah) as one would expect a leader to do
Shias follow the madhab of Ali, and his grandson Jafar Sadiq alayhim assalam
Lie
@@AnwarHossain-ej4md ummmm….. it’s literally the Jaafari school of thought. So where’s the lie?
Shiaatu Ali (shia) is not a religion but a group of people considered followers of Ali practicing Islam with some differences than the four Sunni schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Hanbali, and Wahabi).
Why Ali gave indemnity to the Killer f Usman?
Why Usman was burried in the Jewish Graveyards?
Why Ali took Bayah from those who actively were related to dethrone Usman?
Because ali ra was in under pressure of killer of usman ra
@Smart61able
0 seconds ago
Salaam alaiku Sheikh,
Thanks for putting light on the personality of Imam Jaffer Sadiq (as).
I would like to point few things which needs to be pointed out.
Unfortunately Sheikh you had not done justice historical fact, Imam Husain (as) didn’t uprise with an army he was moving towards Kufa, upon the invitation from the people of Kufa to guide them, with families and friends, ladies and children’s including infants and elderly, not more than 125 people, not an army.
Sheikh you alludes toward similarities between the uprising of Zaid with an army of 15,000 as same as Imam Husain (as) move towards Kufa. Which is historical wrong. Imam Husain didn’t go with army. Would appreciate your response.
Also Sheikh mentions about Muhammad bin Abu Bakr, born an orphane, without mentioned that Muhammad bin Abubakr was brought up by Imam Ali (as).
Also it should be mentioned that in the battle of Jamal between Imam Ali (as), the Khalifa of the time, against rebellious army led by Aisha, Talha and Zuber, which resulted in massacres and death of thousands.
Upon the defeat of rebellion power, Imam Ali (as) commanded Muhammad bin Abubakr, one of Imam Ali’s most loyal commander, to take command of the group who shall in all honor and respect take his sister Aisha back to Medina.
1. Why does the shaykh not refer to Abu Hanifa as Imam Abu Hanifa as he does with Imam Malik (rightly so)
2. What's the source and authenticity of the story he cites regarding Imam Abu hanifa in the palace with Imam Jafar?
Jab zainual abbidin is a adopt son of Hussain... so how he become prophet grandson......
No he wasn't where did you make that up from
This lecture serms to imply that the Ahlul bayt and their followers are all Shia. But the Chisti order of Sufism was founded by Hazrat Moinuddin Chisti of Ajmer who was of the Ahlul bayt and his family is Sunni. And while they don't have supernatural powers, they do possess mystical knowledge of the Quran that they don't share with any outsider and is keot secret even within the family. I can confirm this because my mother's family are Syeds of India
No one believe this. We’re not Christians who keep “original bible” among the “popes”. The Prophet was sent to convey Islam, and he perfected his job and will testify as such in the Day of Judgement. Whatever they thought they’re hiding is just a cult and what we need to know about Islam had already been preserved by Allah swt through the Prophet Muhammad saw
He was not ahlulbayt not every descendant of RasoolAllah is ahlulbayt it goes against the Quran
I tried reach you by phone by no return call. before taking this big task you must have looked into different parts of history. Anis died in year 702 and that year Imam jafer sadiq born. Muhammad bin Abu baker was born before the death of the prophet. and he is sahabi. Muhammad bin Abu Baker was like the son to Ali as Ali married to his mother after the death of Abu baker.
You mentioned in your seerah that abubakar had a daughter, who was born after his death. You said that abubakar advised on his death bed to Ayesha that look after your sister as he thought that he was going to have a daughter and he had a daughter who was born after his death 🤔
Even I have the same question
Is he perfect?
I think Shayke might have mistaken. Muhammad bin Abubakar was born before his father died, but he was about 2 years old.
No, he's not, read on your own. You will realize that he's only protecting his sect. Kindly read on your own. Palestine war and Hizbullah interference has forced these sheikhs to talk about Ahle Bait. Finally.
Always politics is like that? This is inaccurate. Politics should, underline should, always be in line with the śariah
x
orienatalist Not a scholar
Lila palastina
He was a Ahlul Bayt but not belong to Shia sect, only claimed by them as their Imam.
Shi'a is not a sect, it is a term used by the Qur'an, along with Muslim and Mu'min:
And most surely Abraham was among the Shi’a of him (i.e., Noah)”(Qur’an 37:83)
وَإِنَّ مِن شِيعَتِهِ لَإِبْرَاهِيمَ : ٨٣
In another verse, Qur’an talks about the Shi’a of Moses versus the enemies of Moses:
"And he (Moses) went into the city at a time when people (of the city) were not watching, so he found therein two men fighting, one being of his Shi’a and the other beinghis enemy, and the one who was of his Shi’a cried out to him for help against the one who was of his enemy”(Qur’an 28:15)
فَوَجَدَ فِيهَا رَجُلَيْنِ يَقْتَتِلَانِ هَـٰذَا مِن شِيعَتِهِ وَهَـٰذَا مِنْ عَدُوِّهِ ۖفَاسْتَغَاثَهُ الَّذِي مِن شِيعَتِهِ عَلَى الَّذِي مِنْ عَدُوِّهِ...
The Shiites are supporters of the Imams of Ahl al bayt (as) whom they consider as their guides. The supporters of Imam Jafar as Sadiq(as) are his Shiites, this is the meaning of the word Shiite.
What i always got with Yasser Qadhi is because he moved from an extremist takfiri wahabbi over the years to wanting to be seen as a more academic athari he gives a bit of honesty just a bit. He still blatantly misleads with his own biased in what he calls factual for his own biased narrative.
He taking from sunni sources not shi'i. It is complete false when he claims they weren't known as shia leaders even the caliphs knew they claimed Imamate i.e their oppression & imprisonment.
When Imam Redha was asked by Haroon Rashid what is the ahlulbayt evidence for imamate he knew he was the shi'a imam. There is no doubt that is factual not his polemics. Certainly their closet shia companions saw them as their leaders.
He not talking factual when he says they didn't claim this or that. Certain things they couldn't openly say or they would be killed. It isn't rocket science. But their close companions knew who they truly were.
This easy polemical dig when knowing vulnerable situation what they couldn't say openly.
Okay there was some development to come later on as with sunni faith but shia of Ali existed back in the time of RasoolAllah based on hadith. Certainly in the time of Muawiyah. While others might have not known their true status those that kept the faith alive did. He can't whitewash it as all coming later.