Trump is the president who gave Ukraine the weapons that saved kyiv and while Biden lost Afghanistan condemning our allies there and ukraine invaded Trump kept ukraine safe by flying B 52 bombers over Russian held Ukraine.@@TankandDimples
Well...that shows that ukraine is able to push surveillance drones deeper into occupied regions ...russia may be taking lots of ground(by russian standards)...but meanwhile Ukraine is relentlessly destroying any radar/AA equipment they can find..soon the skies will belong to Ukraine- just in time for F16 s
United24 is a government channel, so they will try to put their propaganda out in the best definition possible. (Not saying that United24 is bad, just that they are a state run media, so by default that is classified as propaganda regardless of real or not, just by definition).
They have always been this clear when recorded this way- this is what footage from a DJI drone looks like when it's been recorded to an SD card instead of the real time view via wireless connection. We've seen plenty of this type of footage but it's just in the minority since it's often not important to capture footage at this quality
@@Deltarious Not just that, but every video you are seeing is being pilfered off the internet, so the quality just goes down and down, we almost never get to see straight from the camera.
those high security oil tanks must be paperthin when the small debries from a small drone can penetrate AND ignite the oiltank. It woild also mean in all this cases that the drones were shot down only a couple meter infront/over the tank and at this point it is more likely that the air defense missile hit the tank and not the drone...
@@marcpaulus6291 LOL, good points! Maybe Putin's AA people have discovered the brilliant idea that drones and missiles are easier to hit if you fire munitions at them *after* they've stopped moving.
Beside destroying these s being a legitimate military target, these attacks are causing Russia too move air defenses to help protect them. That takes them off the front lines. You can be petty sure most of this stuff isn't well protected. There are issues trying to protect all this stuff with AD systems and crews to man them.
Talking about "Putin-sized", according to the podcast Ukraine The Latest, Western government officials who met Putlina (my way of decreasing Putler's masculinity) regarded him as "thin skinned".
I agree with keeping destinations vague.. you are very important now.. Duxford is usually nice.. haven’t been in a while.. might need to book a visit soon
I can’t emphasize more how important I think it is to cut refining capacity (and stores). In my opinion Putin will be removed at about 50% refining capacity. I think they are at about 81%. The refined products revenue are holding the kleptocracy together.
My understanding is that since crude pumps too slowly it’s challenging to do high seas transfers so the bulk of “violations of sanctions” is done with high value refined products. Russia discounts and numerous people cash in big time. The world has plenty of refining capacity. There is a refinery near me that is running at maybe 10%. Anyway, I feel if Ukraine smashes refinery, Putin will fall as he can’t keep oligarchs in riches and supply the public and the military.
And it looks like there was a Russian plane parked in front of the FAB Kit storage building that was hit this weekend too. Did you see those satellite pictures as well?
“So called ‘Putin-sized’ puts organs of decadent West to shame! Statement is of own free will, not under threat of unfortunate accident.” - Marjorie Simonyan-Greene.
Hitting Russian fuel depots and refineries has a huge affect on Russia's ability to make money for ghe war effort and to provide fuel for jets, tanks, trucks and trains. If Ukraine can damage enough it will slow Russia down. And it will hurt their finances. There is sipposed to be an embargo on Russian fuel and a price cap. So l doubt it will do much for oil prices as they are anticipated.
Agreed. That was what bomber command & 8th USAAF was all about over Ploesti in WW2. The bonus now is we don't have to send thousands of young boys to die to take out that oil capacity.
What’s interesting is that the GLSDB’s complete failure has fully unlocked the ATACMS floodgates. Lloyd Austin was even smugly smiling about the US’ ATACMS production capacity and saying it was up to Ukraine where they would use them.
I assume that Ukraine has clearly stated: "This and that failed. Now go and fix those things." Test them for functionality under real messy conditions. Then send the new versions to Ukraine.
When will Belarus pay for their Ruzzian support? Will Lukashenko be encouraged to flee to Pootie’s palaces anytime soon? He certainly is doing nothing FOR his own country, but selling 100% of their refined petroleum products to the Ruzzian war machine. Will the Ukraini issue the ultimatum to Lukashenko?…or will Belarus suddenly lose its largest refinery to unauthorized smoking?
Seat cushions if any, clothing left behind, rations and packaging, paint on the metal, engine and transmission lubes… but the ammo is the really hot stuff.
Stolen soft furniture and coffee tables! I have seen fuel lines busted by grenade drops which leaked out all over the shop and were then ignited by a second grenade. Not sure how a fuel line could get ruptured in the main cabin but I’ve seen it 3 times now.
I do not belive that any west suport country sugest ukraine to not attack russ oil depo or rafinneries...its stupid sugest someone to not decrease enemy economy...not logic... 2:12
It’s PR politicss - they didn’t instruct Ukraine to cease or carry on, just that the US doesn’t endorse or suggest it. Way of say saying the right thing on international channels, without actually condemning anything.
Does anyone have the geographic coordinates for the oil depo facility? I’d like to look at the Google Earth historical imagery to see if I can see the oil pipeline that furnishes the oil to the tanks. Thanks if anyone has the info.
If your tank breaks down of becomes immobile, and you know that something will hit you soon, would you bother with closing the hatch trying to get out as fast as you can?
The reason the US is asking for Ukraine to lay off the oil strikes - and the reason Ukraine should actually consider pausing the attacks on oil for now - is probably the upcoming US elections. High or unstable gas prices generally aren't good for the incumbent, and Ukraine very much wants the incumbent to beat the guy who admires putin in the upcoming elections.
The US has never said Ukraine can't target oil facilities - ever. There was merely a single, anonymous source who claimed the US wasn't _encouraging_ strikes on oil facilities - which is not at all the same thing.
Y'all are splitting hairs and demonstrating you don't know how diplomacy works. The fact that you're being forced to resort to such ridiculous arguments should have you re-examining your position.
@@michaelccozens The US doesn't want to stop Ukraine from doing it... they just want to posture (i.e. diplomacy) so it looks like they are saying it. Watch Jake Broe... he'll explain it.
@@michaelccozens That is exactly how diplomacy works. Putting things vaguely and open ended is the default modus operandi, so when you phrase things directly they stand out. Diplomatic relations needs to work across cultures and customs. Saying "We do not encourage" pretty much translates to "We'd rather they didn't, but we are not going to ask them not to either".
Just a quick addition. As the US is selling oil and gas to Europe in place of what the Russians were supplying it's hard to understand why the US is saying what they said. The interesting part is that China and India have become big importers of Russian oil, which, because of big discounts, they are getting cheaper. Now Putin will want to keep them them happy so this will mean cutback in domestic supply, which is on top of the cutbacks from the lose of of these oil depots.
USA said what they said in order to avoid giving putler an excuse for a retaliatory attack against USA with nukes. USA don't want US weapons to be used inside russia, but doesn't lift a finger to stop Ukraine from using Ukrainian weapons inside russia.
Secondary sanctions. "Big importers" have to choose if they want to trade with the US; or "others". Besides, China is wise enough to limit imports by any given supplier to 20% or so.
@@Bob94390 Thanks. Putin keeps rattling the Nuke sabre but as the say in Scotland he's "all wind and pish," I think you can guess the translation for pish. I have to laugh everytime Putin threatens Poland as Poland is just begging for him to try.
I think my purchase of an electric vehicle may have been pointless. There aren't enough electric vehicles in the world to make up for all the greenhouse gases being produced in the war. War always is the ultimate reality check about what is important and what is not.
If an oil tank can be destroyed once, thereby stopping it from being used 100 times, that seems like a 99 % reduction to me. In preparation for the war, putler reduced delivery of gas in 2021. This led to a strong upturn in orders for wind turbines and solar panels in Europe. This war has ironically been great for the climate.
EVs are still barely an ecological alternative to fossil fuel vehicles, with factory build processes and emissions, lithium mining, electricity generation… in 20yrs maybe.
You got this backwards. This is Ukrainian retaliation after Russia started going after Ukrainian civilian heat and electricity infrastructure already in the winter of 2022.
The problem with hitting the oil is that it will lead to higher gas prices which then Russia can use to pay for the war effort. Russia has way more oil storage locations than Ukraine can hit so it helps more than it hurts Russia. Unless they are directly using a facility for military ends I would be suggesting they don't hit them also.
how would that work? russians were using this themselves. also, that is a russian talking point along with- why are you spending money over there instead of fixing domestic problems.
If it is not part of the supply, it's not part of the demand. There is no shortage. Oil companies warn of the danger because they make obscene amounts if $$ building and maintaining refineries and pipelines and do not want that going to China who have the biggest oil companies in the world and the biggest banks supporting them.
"four large and two Putin size" WOW!!
Starting to see a trend here.... Putin sized, Trump sized... Definitely over compensating...
I did hear 💩tin, though
Trump is the president who gave Ukraine the weapons that saved kyiv and while Biden lost Afghanistan condemning our allies there and ukraine invaded Trump kept ukraine safe by flying B 52 bombers over Russian held Ukraine.@@TankandDimples
"Putin-sized"
Mate you absolute savage!
I have noticed that United24 has had some very clear video footage lately like the one you showed. Really high quality and glad they shared! 😊❤️
Well...that shows that ukraine is able to push surveillance drones deeper into occupied regions
...russia may be taking lots of ground(by russian standards)...but meanwhile Ukraine is relentlessly destroying any radar/AA equipment they can find..soon the skies will belong to Ukraine- just in time for F16 s
If the drone comes back, the HD recording is available. Otherwise it's whatever potato bandwidth can transmit back in real time.
@@georgeprout42 makes sense! 😊
United24 is a government channel, so they will try to put their propaganda out in the best definition possible. (Not saying that United24 is bad, just that they are a state run media, so by default that is classified as propaganda regardless of real or not, just by definition).
Putin sized 😂
Mate I'm starting to come here for the humour as much as the reliable, factual info these days!
Thank you, Mr. Suchomimus!
Are comedic satire always puts a smile on my face make me laugh every time😂
Good old British dry sense of humour
@@xXExtremeGameXx Keep the powder and the humor dry.
Thank you, Suchomimus, for making me LOL, which recently happens only when I watch your updates. 🤗
🇺🇦 Перемоги і миру всім українцям! 🇺🇦
These drone drop videos are getting ridiculous clear.
They have always been this clear when recorded this way- this is what footage from a DJI drone looks like when it's been recorded to an SD card instead of the real time view via wireless connection. We've seen plenty of this type of footage but it's just in the minority since it's often not important to capture footage at this quality
No potato camera
@@Deltarious Not just that, but every video you are seeing is being pilfered off the internet, so the quality just goes down and down, we almost never get to see straight from the camera.
russian reports are that everything was shut down, debris fell on tanks.
Those Oil Tanks are such sharpshooters!!! Shot down everything!!!
those high security oil tanks must be paperthin when the small debries from a small drone can penetrate AND ignite the oiltank. It woild also mean in all this cases that the drones were shot down only a couple meter infront/over the tank and at this point it is more likely that the air defense missile hit the tank and not the drone...
Thanks for the info! LOL, gotta love Pootie's Excusies. If "everything was shut down", what was burning? Are Russian oil tanks made of flashpaper?
@@marcpaulus6291 LOL, good points! Maybe Putin's AA people have discovered the brilliant idea that drones and missiles are easier to hit if you fire munitions at them *after* they've stopped moving.
Wonder if the supplies lines inside the tank farm were damaged/contaminated?
Oil infrastructure is a highly legitimate target in this context
It is clearly a military target.
Beside destroying these s being a legitimate military target, these attacks are causing Russia too move air defenses to help protect them. That takes them off the front lines. You can be petty sure most of this stuff isn't well protected.
There are issues trying to protect all this stuff with AD systems and crews to man them.
putin size 😂😂😂 im imagining them wearing high heels 👠 now
Putin and Tom have the same cobbler.
Thanks Sucho,👍👍👍
Talking about "Putin-sized", according to the podcast Ukraine The Latest, Western government officials who met Putlina (my way of decreasing Putler's masculinity) regarded him as "thin skinned".
That's looking like a trend
Little Peter is how I describe him.
@@slartybarfastb3648 I got another one for you: Tsar NIcholas II Version 2.0
@@slartybarfastb3648 I also call him Tsar Nicolas II Version 2.0. ((Tsar Nicolas II was a useless ruler). By the way nice playlists of yours).
All this talk of Putin makes me think of poo in the loo. It stinks.
Good report Sucho. Hope your UK trip is going well. Muffin will be missing you
Cheers. It's going well. Off to Duxford Air Museum tomorrow
@@suchomimus9921Better keep your destination vague for safety.
I agree with keeping destinations vague.. you are very important now.. Duxford is usually nice.. haven’t been in a while.. might need to book a visit soon
@@suchomimus9921bucket list museum for me
Maybe someday
@@suchomimus9921 Nice ! I visited there many times as a kid/teenager, haven't been in decades though, have fun.
"Putin size" OMG 🤣🤣
Brilliant video thank you
"Who ordered the Extra Crispy!.....your order is up!!!"
Thank you for the update.
News channels don’t add comic relief. Thanks sucho
Pin point accuracy...!
Ah Summer Barbacues.
I can’t emphasize more how important I think it is to cut refining capacity (and stores). In my opinion Putin will be removed at about 50% refining capacity. I think they are at about 81%.
The refined products revenue are holding the kleptocracy together.
...and if the sanctions on Russian oil are working, then eliminating their stores and refining capacity should have no effect on the world market.
My understanding is that since crude pumps too slowly it’s challenging to do high seas transfers so the bulk of “violations of sanctions” is done with high value refined products. Russia discounts and numerous people cash in big time. The world has plenty of refining capacity. There is a refinery near me that is running at maybe 10%. Anyway, I feel if Ukraine smashes refinery, Putin will fall as he can’t keep oligarchs in riches and supply the public and the military.
@@MyFiddlePlayermost is going to China and India. The question is how strict can the sanctions be, without slowing down the world economy?
And it looks like there was a Russian plane parked in front of the FAB Kit storage building that was hit this weekend too. Did you see those satellite pictures as well?
Oh yeah, I forgot they were out
Them Russians are very heavy smokers.
Tanks for the upload……😘🤣
This is a strategic air campaign, pin prick by pin prick
Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦
I guess the Russians need to move to EV's.
They enjoy overproduction from China
“So called ‘Putin-sized’ puts organs of decadent West to shame! Statement is of own free will, not under threat of unfortunate accident.”
- Marjorie Simonyan-Greene.
💙🇺🇦💙🇺🇦💙🇺🇦💙
Arde tudo
SLAVA Ukraini 🇺🇦🔱🇺🇦
Spot on work ! 👍🇬🇧
Don't see the turret toss as much anymore. I wonder if Russia has stopped giving their tanks ammo.
Running out of tanks?
Thank you for the updates
I've been Sub'd to United 24 for over a year. Great channel!
Will there be a satelite damage assessment on Kushcyovskaya airbase too? The one where the glidekits were destroyed.
👍💙💛🇺🇦
🇺🇦 Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦. ✌🏼
Hitting Russian fuel depots and refineries has a huge affect on Russia's ability to make money for ghe war effort and to provide fuel for jets, tanks, trucks and trains. If Ukraine can damage enough it will slow Russia down. And it will hurt their finances. There is sipposed to be an embargo on Russian fuel and a price cap. So l doubt it will do much for oil prices as they are anticipated.
Agreed. That was what bomber command & 8th USAAF was all about over Ploesti in WW2. The bonus now is we don't have to send thousands of young boys to die to take out that oil capacity.
What’s interesting is that the GLSDB’s complete failure has fully unlocked the ATACMS floodgates. Lloyd Austin was even smugly smiling about the US’ ATACMS production capacity and saying it was up to Ukraine where they would use them.
I assume that Ukraine has clearly stated: "This and that failed. Now go and fix those things."
Test them for functionality under real messy conditions. Then send the new versions to Ukraine.
Bang!!! Bang!!! Bang!!!
but did these tanks have cope cages?
Tks.
Cda.
26k cu metres? As inspector Clouseau would say, Not any more.
💪🇫🇮🇺🇦🫡
🇺🇦🇺🇦👍👍
Thanks for your great videos. 🇦🇺👴🏻
Ukraine getting serious. Now Ukraine can throw hands with gloves offs.
No cope cages = wrecked. lol
Gasoline in Minnesota is dropping in price, I paid $3 a gallon, down from $3.25 a month ago.
In fact, captured German officers said the allies turned the tide of the war to allied advantage when German gas supplies were repeatedly attacked.
When will Belarus pay for their Ruzzian support? Will Lukashenko be encouraged to flee to Pootie’s palaces anytime soon? He certainly is doing nothing FOR his own country, but selling 100% of their refined petroleum products to the Ruzzian war machine. Will the Ukraini issue the ultimatum to Lukashenko?…or will Belarus suddenly lose its largest refinery to unauthorized smoking?
"Four large and two putin-sized ..." Tell us what you really think😂😂😂
Apart from the shells in a tank what actually burns? I'm assuming the inside is not full of soft furniture and coffee tables
good question. something sure does.
Seat cushions if any, clothing left behind, rations and packaging, paint on the metal, engine and transmission lubes… but the ammo is the really hot stuff.
Stolen soft furniture and coffee tables! I have seen fuel lines busted by grenade drops which leaked out all over the shop and were then ignited by a second grenade. Not sure how a fuel line could get ruptured in the main cabin but I’ve seen it 3 times now.
Fuel.
Hydraulic fluid. Engine oil.
Here's the thing about Smolensk; the Poles will be rather interested on that topic...
F Da Ruz...
LOL. I see what u did there 😁
"Putin-sized" was new. 😂 Until now, i only knew Stormy Daniels's version of "Trump-sized". 🤣🤣🤣
I do not belive that any west suport country sugest ukraine to not attack russ oil depo or rafinneries...its stupid sugest someone to not decrease enemy economy...not logic... 2:12
genocide joe biden did, out of self interest which for him is far more important than freedom and democracy in Ukraine.
But are the suggestions that Ukraine not hit oil infrastructure just pantomime?
US being seen to not endorse.
It’s PR politicss - they didn’t instruct Ukraine to cease or carry on, just that the US doesn’t endorse or suggest it. Way of say saying the right thing on international channels, without actually condemning anything.
0:45 ✅
Does anyone have the geographic coordinates for the oil depo facility? I’d like to look at the Google Earth historical imagery to see if I can see the oil pipeline that furnishes the oil to the tanks. Thanks if anyone has the info.
Show this after 1 month full repaired
🗿
Why do Russian tank drivers leave the lids open?
If your tank breaks down of becomes immobile, and you know that something will hit you soon, would you bother with closing the hatch trying to get out as fast as you can?
So the tanks are destroyed, that means they can justify abandoning them, and they won't be ordered to try to recover them.
I command you to hit the LIKE button
pootin says the drones were shot down, but unfortunately some of the scrap from the drones fell on the oil storage tanks.
Why do they leave the tank latch open when they abandon a tank?
Fear of being caught in, on or near a broken down vehicle. You just want to get the hell away.
The Russians Need to take "Care" of Putin.
Putin sized: very funny! 👍😊
The reason the US is asking for Ukraine to lay off the oil strikes - and the reason Ukraine should actually consider pausing the attacks on oil for now - is probably the upcoming US elections.
High or unstable gas prices generally aren't good for the incumbent, and Ukraine very much wants the incumbent to beat the guy who admires putin in the upcoming elections.
Could of been one drone….and then the fire kept spreading. It’s a possibility
Could've, there's a clue in the word. Could have. And yes, it's important if you want to make a point that's not immediately dismissed.
@@georgeprout42 sorry UA-cam police.
Halloween
The US has never said Ukraine can't target oil facilities - ever. There was merely a single, anonymous source who claimed the US wasn't _encouraging_ strikes on oil facilities - which is not at all the same thing.
Y'all are splitting hairs and demonstrating you don't know how diplomacy works. The fact that you're being forced to resort to such ridiculous arguments should have you re-examining your position.
@@michaelccozens The US doesn't want to stop Ukraine from doing it... they just want to posture (i.e. diplomacy) so it looks like they are saying it. Watch Jake Broe... he'll explain it.
@@michaelccozens That is exactly how diplomacy works. Putting things vaguely and open ended is the default modus operandi, so when you phrase things directly they stand out. Diplomatic relations needs to work across cultures and customs.
Saying "We do not encourage" pretty much translates to "We'd rather they didn't, but we are not going to ask them not to either".
Nope, it came from genocide joe, prioritising his interests over freedom and democracy . . as always.
Burn Oil refineries 😑😊🔥🔥
"pas de bras pas de chocolat": Les Intouchables.
No money no war. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦✌🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
RF internal cascade effect.
Wonder if the "suggestions " are the public words. While behind closed doors a different talk happens
Just a quick addition. As the US is selling oil and gas to Europe in place of what the Russians were supplying it's hard to understand why the US is saying what they said.
The interesting part is that China and India have become big importers of Russian oil, which, because of big discounts, they are getting cheaper. Now Putin will want to keep them them happy so this will mean cutback in domestic supply, which is on top of the cutbacks from the lose of of these oil depots.
USA said what they said in order to avoid giving putler an excuse for a retaliatory attack against USA with nukes. USA don't want US weapons to be used inside russia, but doesn't lift a finger to stop Ukraine from using Ukrainian weapons inside russia.
There is another UA-camr who goes into some detail about ruzzian oil and gas production and export. Their initials are JB.
Secondary sanctions. "Big importers" have to choose if they want to trade with the US; or "others". Besides, China is wise enough to limit imports by any given supplier to 20% or so.
@@petersmithm9Jake?
@@Bob94390 Thanks. Putin keeps rattling the Nuke sabre but as the say in Scotland he's "all wind and pish," I think you can guess the translation for pish.
I have to laugh everytime Putin threatens Poland as Poland is just begging for him to try.
🍔
FIRST
😂🎉
What cookie did you pick?
@@bobeyes3284 Chocolate chip ,,,,,,, I shouldn't have that much sugar but I couldn't resist :)
1:30 finally drone footage that hasnt been blurred and compressed into potatocam vision!
that's the difference between an FPV drone and a Grenade Drop drone.
I think my purchase of an electric vehicle may have been pointless. There aren't enough electric vehicles in the world to make up for all the greenhouse gases being produced in the war. War always is the ultimate reality check about what is important and what is not.
If an oil tank can be destroyed once, thereby stopping it from being used 100 times, that seems like a 99 % reduction to me.
In preparation for the war, putler reduced delivery of gas in 2021. This led to a strong upturn in orders for wind turbines and solar panels in Europe.
This war has ironically been great for the climate.
@@Bob94390Right on!
As long as the electricity for you vehicle still comes mostly from fosil fuel anyway, who the fuck were you even kidding in the first place?
EVs are still barely an ecological alternative to fossil fuel vehicles, with factory build processes and emissions, lithium mining, electricity generation… in 20yrs maybe.
EVs are a waste of time and a dead end, just another con to get the hard of thinking to waste their money.
Many in Russia would be pissed as majority of Russians would interpret Putin sized as the large ones.
Please post about energy crisis in Kiev following Russia retaliation. This is madness 🙄
You got this backwards. This is Ukrainian retaliation after Russia started going after Ukrainian civilian heat and electricity infrastructure already in the winter of 2022.
Sucho analyses footage of specific incidents in forensic detail, he does not specxulate on policy or the wider situtaion.
I smell cope bot deflecting.
The problem with hitting the oil is that it will lead to higher gas prices which then Russia can use to pay for the war effort. Russia has way more oil storage locations than Ukraine can hit so it helps more than it hurts Russia. Unless they are directly using a facility for military ends I would be suggesting they don't hit them also.
If they charge more for their oil, nobody will buy it. India and China will look elsewhere.
If this were true, Russia could simply export less oil and still come out ahead.
No
Utter driv el, copebot
Haha! schools in Russia are absolutely awful.
Doesn't this ultimately raise gas prices for western allies?
No.
Russia stopped exporting a while back. I don't see how it would effect the global price when Russia wasn't providing fuel for the global market.
how would that work? russians were using this themselves.
also, that is a russian talking point along with- why are you spending money over there instead of fixing domestic problems.
If it is not part of the supply, it's not part of the demand. There is no shortage. Oil companies warn of the danger because they make obscene amounts if $$ building and maintaining refineries and pipelines and do not want that going to China who have the biggest oil companies in the world and the biggest banks supporting them.
@@bobeyes3284 they are still exporting for billions just not to EU but but china, india and Turkey