Native settlement, Spahi and falconnet army composition for 10 minutes, imams ... Aiz really said I'm gonna do the most unconventional stuff in 1 game before starting the game
I like how devs nerf rush civs like Ethopians, Lakota, etc then let Ottomans FF in under 6 mins. Def seems like they want noob RTS players to come play age 3 like how they designed age 4. AKA no rush, no skill, all camp. I grinded for years to develop proper multitasking/ hot key muscle memory. Stop bending to these noobs devs. SMH
this wasnt a match... this was an example of how bad the devs have skewed their vision to legacy civs and camping. Making sure aggressive civs are on par with camping civs are what make RTS great. the devs don't care about that they only care about new purchases and noobs who figure out how to age up quick or camp till you win. smh
If anyone thinks this doesnt need a complete rework/nerf/ overhaul you're part of the camper cohert that is ruining this age3. Props to Azimac for utilizing an exploit like the pro he is but bruh... can stop favoring camping civs over rush civs and can we stop allowing legacy civs to dominate over new additions. It took how many year to get a dutch nerf... like please. Such skill to build a bank and sit back and win. common man
But then you nerf swedes to the dirt. you nerfed ethopains into the dirt. you nerfed Haudenosaunee into the dirt until recently when DEVs revived them and now they're actually fun to play. Can we stop favoring camping civs
My favorite channel on youtube uploaded a video. thats happiness
@@AgeOfStreaming me too
Native settlement, Spahi and falconnet army composition for 10 minutes, imams ... Aiz really said I'm gonna do the most unconventional stuff in 1 game before starting the game
Exactly
he should have reserved some coins for gatling camel shipments those 9 gatling camels would have crushed the enemy infantry
usually spawn bombards before attacking
aiz plays like no other
i think that the otoman revolution is good. but the incas (even with nerfs) are busted.
Dawg if you think a FF in under 6 mins is okay then you're clearly biased
A weird match by none other than aiz.
I love aoe3 revolutions
I do too but they need to nerf certain specality units. This game is so multifacited I understand why devs have such a hard time keeping up.
@@johnnada But I think people don't revolution that much, most people tend to rush, ff and fi.
Please explain why the Saphi are like god units? never understood that. 6 mins... then god units roll up and destroy 2x their mass. Huh? da fuk?
I dont care what the score says this game was over around the 8 mins mark
I like how devs nerf rush civs like Ethopians, Lakota, etc then let Ottomans FF in under 6 mins. Def seems like they want noob RTS players to come play age 3 like how they designed age 4. AKA no rush, no skill, all camp. I grinded for years to develop proper multitasking/ hot key muscle memory. Stop bending to these noobs devs. SMH
this wasnt a match... this was an example of how bad the devs have skewed their vision to legacy civs and camping. Making sure aggressive civs are on par with camping civs are what make RTS great. the devs don't care about that they only care about new purchases and noobs who figure out how to age up quick or camp till you win. smh
To those of you complaining please come back to AoE 3 Asian Dynasties. We missed you and it's not broken
If anyone thinks this doesnt need a complete rework/nerf/ overhaul you're part of the camper cohert that is ruining this age3. Props to Azimac for utilizing an exploit like the pro he is but bruh... can stop favoring camping civs over rush civs and can we stop allowing legacy civs to dominate over new additions. It took how many year to get a dutch nerf... like please. Such skill to build a bank and sit back and win. common man
But then you nerf swedes to the dirt. you nerfed ethopains into the dirt. you nerfed Haudenosaunee into the dirt until recently when DEVs revived them and now they're actually fun to play. Can we stop favoring camping civs