And to answer the dude's question, yes it's cheating. It's all cheating in my opinion, including the losers who manipulate the cfg file. PGI can be too lazy to confront their paying customers, but it's still cheating.
@@ratofnihm Who cheated here, in this video? Be serious, also consider that here on the IS side, there are probably six or seven players from the very top. As for buying, I also buy, just like them, only that also being T1 on full bar, my match score this month was 284, theirs probably on average 450.
@@Aquagenesis Watch the video again retard. The guy asks a "theoretical" question about manipulating video card settings to delete things like fog and other visibility issues to create an unfair advantage for themselves that other players won't enjoy, unless they also cheat. I stated my opinion on the subject that yes it's cheating. I think all game manipulation is cheating. cfg manipulation, macros, fucking with video card settings, etc etc. It's all cheating. Why do I consider it cheating? because the vast majority of players aren't going to be pulling shady shit like that, they just log in and play. But for those who obviously can't perform well without an unfair advantage, it's apparently the only way they can win. Hence why they are losers.
@@Aquagenesis From what I've watched from that video, you can remove trees, that otherwise would block your sight. You can remove the blinding flashes from firing UACs, or similar weapons, that the enemy who's firing back, is still getting his aim hampered because of said flashes. True fact: I wanted to buy the Adder Cinder, to build it with UACs in the side torsos, but after testing it out, I said "NOPE! I would turn into epileptic after a couple of matches". As the guns are very close to the cockpit. Now, would the game benefit ALL players if they toned down those flashes? Yes. But only a few people doing it, it gives them a tactical advantage, even if PGI is saying it's ok. As for the Attack of those clanners, I feel the pain. The whole setting is against the attackers. Fighting through a narrow corridor (like in Hotgates), with an objective to do within time, and have to push through. I was in a similar attack mission, but a different map, and while I was fighting close to the doors, over some hills, I was getting the "Out of bounds" warning. I mean, ffs, game, you don't want us to win, clearly. And I don't mean at the edges of the map, it was almost at the center of the map, near the doors.
Chat comm has turned into an AM talk radio station.
I can remember when Clan had a fair chance of dominating like this too if the team had the players for it. Now? fat chance.
And to answer the dude's question, yes it's cheating. It's all cheating in my opinion, including the losers who manipulate the cfg file. PGI can be too lazy to confront their paying customers, but it's still cheating.
@@ratofnihm Who cheated here, in this video? Be serious, also consider that here on the IS side, there are probably six or seven players from the very top. As for buying, I also buy, just like them, only that also being T1 on full bar, my match score this month was 284, theirs probably on average 450.
@@ratofnihm You DO realize that modifying user/game cfg file isn't against CoC right, but explain how they are losers here.
@@Aquagenesis Watch the video again retard. The guy asks a "theoretical" question about manipulating video card settings to delete things like fog and other visibility issues to create an unfair advantage for themselves that other players won't enjoy, unless they also cheat.
I stated my opinion on the subject that yes it's cheating. I think all game manipulation is cheating. cfg manipulation, macros, fucking with video card settings, etc etc. It's all cheating. Why do I consider it cheating? because the vast majority of players aren't going to be pulling shady shit like that, they just log in and play. But for those who obviously can't perform well without an unfair advantage, it's apparently the only way they can win. Hence why they are losers.
@@Aquagenesis From what I've watched from that video, you can remove trees, that otherwise would block your sight. You can remove the blinding flashes from firing UACs, or similar weapons, that the enemy who's firing back, is still getting his aim hampered because of said flashes. True fact: I wanted to buy the Adder Cinder, to build it with UACs in the side torsos, but after testing it out, I said "NOPE! I would turn into epileptic after a couple of matches". As the guns are very close to the cockpit. Now, would the game benefit ALL players if they toned down those flashes? Yes. But only a few people doing it, it gives them a tactical advantage, even if PGI is saying it's ok.
As for the Attack of those clanners, I feel the pain. The whole setting is against the attackers. Fighting through a narrow corridor (like in Hotgates), with an objective to do within time, and have to push through. I was in a similar attack mission, but a different map, and while I was fighting close to the doors, over some hills, I was getting the "Out of bounds" warning. I mean, ffs, game, you don't want us to win, clearly. And I don't mean at the edges of the map, it was almost at the center of the map, near the doors.
👍