Integral Test | Derivation & 1st Example

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @csul9193
    @csul9193 2 роки тому +21

    49 seconds into the video and this makes so much more sense than trying to learn elsewhere 🙌

  • @gentlemandude1
    @gentlemandude1 4 роки тому +13

    Wow! My calculus professor never explained why the integral test works (even when I asked her directly), she just described the conditions under which the integral test can be used. Dr. Bazett, your explanation is so clear and well explained. Thank you for finally giving me the explanation that I've been searching for.

  • @andrewlee8340
    @andrewlee8340 2 роки тому +9

    This is the first example, anywhere, that has mentioned that the “dx” here is 1. Every other video and textbook seemed to assume the student would understand that, but because you emphasized it, I can finally understand the integral test conceptually.

  • @lapissheepz8741
    @lapissheepz8741 Рік тому +2

    Your videos are a gift, thank you. I find them a lot more clear/concise than many more popular channels, and especially moreso than my textbook.

  • @lessthanzero.
    @lessthanzero. Рік тому +1

    One of the best math channels when it comes to building intuition behind calculus

  • @jingyiwang5113
    @jingyiwang5113 2 роки тому +1

    I am really grateful for your detailed explanation and patience in explaining this point. I finally understand it after struggling to understand it by myself for so many days. Thank you so much! :-)

  • @SW-nx4jz
    @SW-nx4jz 4 роки тому +4

    You explained this very well. Thank you Mr Bazzett!

  • @diegobravo641
    @diegobravo641 4 місяці тому

    Superb content as always. Calculus looks intuitive with your series! Very well done proffesor. 🎉

  • @SilvanaSuarez-sk1gq
    @SilvanaSuarez-sk1gq Рік тому

    me sorprende que no tenga más vistas, está buenísimo

  • @anthonyheak3479
    @anthonyheak3479 Рік тому +1

    Very well explained professor!

  • @lahirkealmeida5549
    @lahirkealmeida5549 3 роки тому

    Your videos are very well made. Thank you for the explanation, I was having trouble understanding the concept only by the textbook

  • @liorbelkin3038
    @liorbelkin3038 3 роки тому +4

    Very helpful, thanks

  • @JamesBrodski
    @JamesBrodski 3 роки тому +2

    Great video! Thank you so much.

  • @evelyntromp789
    @evelyntromp789 3 роки тому +2

    Absolutely amazing! Thank you so much!

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  3 роки тому +3

      You're very welcome!

  • @israelhernandez7486
    @israelhernandez7486 6 років тому +3

    great video thanks

  • @quanle9133
    @quanle9133 4 роки тому +2

    Hi thank you for the awesome contents!what software do you use to create the visuals?

  • @quanle9133
    @quanle9133 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much professor. CLEAR!!!!!

  • @karomismatov6790
    @karomismatov6790 2 роки тому

    Спасибо большое за большую работу...

  • @spacepanda3375
    @spacepanda3375 4 роки тому +2

    6:52 I think it should be sum from n=2 for convergence test

    • @spenceplayscod2684
      @spenceplayscod2684 4 роки тому +2

      You are correct, but so is the video. If the improper integral converges, then the sum from 2 to infinity converges, which is equivalent to saying the sum from 1 to infinity converges, since the first term does not affect convergence :)

  • @rahultayal9275
    @rahultayal9275 4 роки тому

    Thank u sir for such a intuitive , clear and well animated explanation

    • @rahultayal9275
      @rahultayal9275 4 роки тому

      Sir plz make video on logarthmic and raabe's test and what is the intuition behind them

  • @veliamomo6561
    @veliamomo6561 3 роки тому +1

    this episode is god like!

  • @christoskettenis880
    @christoskettenis880 2 роки тому

    Great explanation!

  • @RumkiRumki-x9j
    @RumkiRumki-x9j 5 місяців тому

    @Dr.Trefore Bazette I am bit late.Can you explain why the "less than or equal" sign used in the statement where the inegral is less than summation of a sub n?

  • @suesun2597
    @suesun2597 Рік тому

    thank u sooooo much!!!! really helpful

  • @jonathanbacon3248
    @jonathanbacon3248 4 роки тому +2

    Shoutout Prof. Allen

  • @rolandfeghali4009
    @rolandfeghali4009 Місяць тому +1

    the best

  • @reneemiriam8552
    @reneemiriam8552 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much Sir

  • @illumexhisoka6181
    @illumexhisoka6181 Рік тому

    We can use this as a test both ways
    Right ?

  • @gardenmenuuu
    @gardenmenuuu 3 роки тому +1

    great sir btw can you tell me which app you used for these math animatios?like in 1:40

  • @theleviathan3902
    @theleviathan3902 2 роки тому

    Couldn't you use the rectangles from the first example on always increasing functions to prove they converge

  • @DrRAK
    @DrRAK 4 роки тому +2

    Sir @Dr. Trefor Bazett, why we can't apply integral test when the function f(x) is increasing?

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  4 роки тому +1

      It would be saying it was smaller than something divergent, which means it could be divergent or convergent.

    • @DrRAK
      @DrRAK 4 роки тому

      @@DrTrefor Thanks for reply. Do you mean we can also apply integral test for increasing function or not? I am sorry I am still confused because I think the same inequalities are obtained for increasing function and same comparison can be used for increasing functions as well. However I think in case of increasing functions, other tests (like n-th term test ) are better to use. Am I right?
      Sir if possible for you, please make a video on this or otherwise please elaborate it in detail.
      I will be grateful.
      Regards.

  • @becky7564
    @becky7564 4 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @陳1013
    @陳1013 Рік тому

    why the n here in (1) is not n=2?

  • @avneeshkhanna
    @avneeshkhanna 4 роки тому

    Why does f need to be positive, continuous, and monotonically decreasing?

    • @avneeshkhanna
      @avneeshkhanna 4 роки тому

      @@DrTrefor I agree that f needs to be continuous (otherwise it may be undefined at integers in the first place). I also agree that it needs to be monotonic (eg: the test doesn't work on f=sin^2(pi*x)).
      What my doubt is that if the test works for f being positive AND monotonically decreasing, shouldn't it work for positive AND monotonically increasing as well?

    • @ПАУК-о2я
      @ПАУК-о2я 11 місяців тому

      @@avneeshkhanna I have the same question too. Maybe you understand more about math and could help me understand it? thank you

  • @zacharyh5419
    @zacharyh5419 3 роки тому +1

    got a test coming up, betting all my cards on this series cuz i sure as hell aint betting it on my brain

  • @hikmatullahpakhtoon3694
    @hikmatullahpakhtoon3694 3 роки тому

    Sir! Doesn't this test give us the exact value to which the series converge?

    • @_mark_3814
      @_mark_3814 2 роки тому +1

      No

    • @darkeyes9902
      @darkeyes9902 2 роки тому

      Nope. Just tell you whether convergence or not. Important Note : The number to which integral converges is not the sum of there series!

  • @haseen2412
    @haseen2412 6 місяців тому

    Very well explained!!