17. Finite Mixture (FIMIX) Model in SmartPLS-4 || Dr. Dhaval Maheta

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2022
  • #sem, #smartpls, #construct, #latent, #model, #fimix, #observed, #unobserved, #heterogeneity, #segment, #smartpls4
    Email: dhavalmaheta1977@gmail.com
    Twitter: / dhavalmaheta77
    LinkedIn: / dhaval-maheta-320200153
    Facebook ID: / dhaval.maheta.37
    Telegram ID: t.me/DhavalMaheta

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @michaelpaulse1
    @michaelpaulse1 Рік тому +1

    Hello professor thank you for a great lesson. Just a question: The size of Partition 2 is less than the minimum sample determined by G Power, why is it then considered?

    • @michaelpaulse1
      @michaelpaulse1 Рік тому

      Could you send me your PPT as well? I did send you an email. Could you also send me your PPT on Micom? Kind regards, Michael PhD Student, South Africa

  • @jazcpcuev9915
    @jazcpcuev9915 Рік тому

    Thanks is a ver very good lesson

  • @ruchiragarai8227
    @ruchiragarai8227 Рік тому

    Hello sir, thankyou for this informative video. I have run fimix on a dataset, however after creation of the new data file, there is no Final Partition row present alongwith the other new FIMIX segment rows that were created. Does that mean the data does not have unobserved heterogeneity?

  • @Franzi634
    @Franzi634 Рік тому

    Thank you! :) Just one question, why did you keep the mean replacement (Data) while running FIMIX? I thought it is recommanded to click on casewise deletion or am I wrong?

  • @cata.maican
    @cata.maican 7 місяців тому

    Hi,
    in the last slide you mentioned something about quality standards for the partitions. Are these criteria the same as the step 2 (and 3) from MICOM/MGA? What happens if these standards are not met?
    Thank you.

    • @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash
      @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash  7 місяців тому

      can you mention the time line

    • @cata.maican
      @cata.maican 7 місяців тому

      Hi, about 38:40, step 4, the last part of the first bullet point, combined with the second bullet

    • @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash
      @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash  7 місяців тому

      @@cata.maican so this was related to reliability and validity of separate models you make considering fimix

  • @lamthihoanganh406
    @lamthihoanganh406 9 місяців тому

    Thanks for your video; however, I have a question: How can I detect the second group for observed variables like Class Type? Unbalance percentage >> Observed variables?

    • @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash
      @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash  9 місяців тому

      you will have to check manually in spss or excel

    • @lamthihoanganh406
      @lamthihoanganh406 9 місяців тому

      ​@@DhavalSaifaleeAaryash Thanks for your prompt response but I don't know what criteria that we use to identify the Observed variable? Is it the same percentage?
      For example, FIMIX-PLS group 1: 155 - 49.68%
      FIMIX-PLS group 2: 157 - 50.32%
      >> Gender:
      Male: 229 - 73.4%
      Female: 82 - 26.3%
      >> Age Group
      18 - 24: 57 - 18.3%
      25 - 34: 179 - 57.4%
      35 - 44: 69 - 22.1%
      45 - 54: 7 - 2.2%
      >> Marital Status
      Single: 171 - 54.8%
      Married: 138 - 44.2%
      Others: 3 - 1%
      >> We choose "Marital Status" right?

    • @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash
      @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash  9 місяців тому

      @@lamthihoanganh406 fimix is used for unobserved heterogeneity. So we use percentages

    • @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash
      @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash  9 місяців тому

      You can connect with me on mail: dhavalmaheta1977@gmail.com