Ion Propulsion - The Plane With No Moving Parts
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 гру 2018
- Get 2 months of Skillshare for FREE using this link: skl.sh/realengineering18
New vlog channel: / @brianmcmanus
Patreon:
www.patreon.com/user?u=282505...
Facebook:
/ realengineering1
Instagram:
/ brianjamesmcmanus
Twitter:
/ thebrianmcmanus
Discord:
/ discord
Get your Real Engineering shirts at: standard.tv/collections/real-...
Credits:
Narrator/Director: Brian McManus
Co-Director: Mike Ridolfi (www.moboxgraphics.com/)
Sound: Graham Haerther (haerther.net/)
Thumbnail: Simon Buckmaster / forgottentowel
References:
[1] www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/ab...
[2] web.stanford.edu/~boyd/papers...
[3] go.nature.com/2CC86cw
[4] rspa.royalsocietypublishing.or...
Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com/creator
Songs:
Solving It Together 1 - Gunnar Johnsén
Timepass 1 - Gunnar Johnsén
A Trip To The Moon - Aiolos Rue
Emoticon 17 - Niclas Gustavsson
Positive Process - From Now On
Thank you to my patreon supporters: Adam Flohr, Henning Basma, Karl Andersson, Mark Govea, Hank Green, William Leu, Jason A., Chris Plays Games, Tristan Edwards, Ken Coltan, Andrew McCorkell, Ian Dundore, John & Becki Johnston. Nevin Spoljaric, Jason Clark, Christopher Lam, Deven Warren Rathbun. - Наука та технологія
There are some minor mistakes in the video.
The potential difference between the two electrodes (wire and wing) is 40kV, since the wire is charged to +20kV and the wing to -20kV.
The voltage type is also DC and not AC.
The DC voltage of the battery is converted to AC by a H-bridge circuit. This AC is transformed to a higher voltage level and finally converted to a high voltage DC by the Cockroft-Walton generator.
It has also been in "development" a lot longer. A paper describes the theories of ionic propulsion and is basically what they build today. In the paper they even say, that it will be possible they just don't have the technology to make the transformers etc small enough. (both was done my MIT tho)
It's rather ionic, don't you think? The thrust required will never be enough. It takes too long to build up enough thrust for regular flights. You don't want to take several months to fly somewhere.
kitemanmusic what if the plane already had propulsion flying in the air and instead a jet engine plane flew next to it to drop passengers in then landed and repeated
@Honey b. I don't think Allah has anything to do with this
@@FrozenSniperShots
Or a hybrid if that's possible: jet propulsion to get into the air and get to the right speed and ion propulsion to just keep the same speed going.
I love that you dont push for that 10min mark
Hearting this for visibility mostly. 1. I don't put ads on my videos for the first month, so there is little reason to try and place 2 ads. 2. People need to stop assuming that a videos length is determined by that. If I make a video just below 10 minutes I get praised, if I make a video above 10 minutes I get complaints. The videos are as long as they need to be, and I don't know single EDU channel that doesn't follow that principle.
Do you not want him to make money ?
@I Am Sekou youre a sociopath
Hello there friend!
Why? 933 or 10 for cash, why should i give a shit?
@@RealEngineering just keep up the great work. However long the video doesnt matter, when we can learn more
Love how the ion propelled plane looks remarkably similar to the right brothers plane of over 100 years ago.
Because, much like that one, it doesn't really fly.
@@sirdeakia really how doesn’t it “really fly” just curious unless you mean it just glides
@@sirdeakia its flying, just poorly.
@@deidyomega its falling sideways
Yall realize this is the first step in building a "twin ion engine" or TIE Fighter.
@@tripplefives1402 yeaaaah
@@tripplefives1402 Are you telling me that the cool sounds the TIEs make are not possible?
@@jaywu4804 sound is nothing but vibration and in space there's no medium for those vibrations to go through so yes, space is silent.
@@jaywu4804 The cool sounds the ties make are a guy in a 1930s movie screaming as he's eaten by a crocodile. It's the most overused scream in stock footage history. They just did some computer processing to the sound to make it sound more mechanical.
@@WildBluntHickok Well, just like people said: In space, no body can hear you scream unless you are being eaten by a space crocodile 🐊 while sitting in a metal ball.
Much as I know the physics, this is still magic to me
It's all just s reaction
It's engineering 😀😀😀
@@umeshhajare1733 It's actually plasma physics
@@umeshhajare1733 wipe
I recall a negative ion generator gadget. Apart from removing dust it had a very obvious detectable airflow.
Wendover Productions is playing at some T-Series shenanigans and trying to overtake me in Instagram followers. Can't let him win. instagram.com/brianjamesmcmanus/
Real Engineering nuclear reactors are good
MIT is a wizard college, got it.
Real Engineering just saying every propulsion system will have moving parts. It’s called *Throttle*
RazorRidge
Actually, volt regulation can be done with non moving electrical components and digital systems
Real engineering. I don't see how you get to these values. If you take a Trent 1000 engine, your power consumption is 540 W/N or 1,8 N per kW. I don't see how you get 50 N per kW for a helicopter. Could you please show me your calculations?
Ion Engine: I am the first aircraft engine with no moving parts!
Ramjets: Am I a joke to you?
Scramjet: WTF dude?!
you must have valves and probably a pump(s) ... moving. Flaps, rudders ... hmmm...
Pulse jet: sky rex you suck you forgot me.
@@teresawatson8936 Ion planes also have flaps and rudders\
Paper Airplanes:
@@allenstuder6938 Actually that's one of the things that can be avoided. If instead of the racks the MIT team used you used pins along the surface of the airfoil, you could increase the airspeed over whichever airfoil you wanted. Somebody made a small RC plane that had a normal propeller but the pitch and roll was ion drive. It wasn't great but it was the idea XD
2018: The Plane With No Moving Parts
2028: The Plane With No Cabin Or Wings
Yeah, why use wings if you can use directional thrusters.
2030
The iplane you pay 3000 usd to drive somewhere
You mean a quadcopter?
@AKUJIRULE yeah that's right, no luck there without breakthrough propulsion technology
@@steelwasp9375 ya, sit on a rocket instead.
Rare footage of TIE Fighter prototype being tested
TIE FIGHTERS CONFIRMED!
Ha
@Mikolaj Kraszewski what does that have to do with my comment?
Damit, you beat me to the joke.
TIE/sk “Striker”
I remember reading about ion engines in grade school 50 years ago. Seems they haven’t come nearly as far as those books authors predicted. Reminds me of the nuclear fusion joke; it’s always 30 years away.
(Yes, I’m aware they play a very small roll in satellites)
I believe that I read a Scientific American article about these drives in the 60s.
Ion engines don't play a "small" role in satellites An ion engine is the main engine in a space probe thats visiting asteroids ion engines are used in many places
Ethan, yeah I'm sure that was what I was rembering. A large high voltage power supply with a long cable. I was fascinated by the concept though and realized that an on board supply would be necessary to further the idea.
Hi @@mastershooter64 ,
I never said they play a small role, it must have been someone else. They are very important in space and will soon be commercially available for small lightweight drones, like the working rough prototypes on my channel.
If the military can weaponize it, itd a
Only take a month for it jump ahead an entire century
What happens when you put a negative Ion generator into the atmosphere? I somehow think you will have more energy than expected. It will find you lightning fast.
At first I didn't see the pun - then it struck me.
@@doggo6517 I am so shocked by the pun too.
US ARMY : "Alright now how do we turn it into an ion bomb" 🤔
Hmm 🌚
If they haven’t weaponised it already.
Why tf would they do that when they've already made hundreds of nuclear weapons.
@@drained1177 why wouldn't we. Answer me that
You mean the human race, right?
I see you've been playing Kerbal Space Program.
Remember check your staging
TIE FIGHTERS CONFIRMED!
Holy shit, it's you again!!
Definitely UA-cam employees on shifts that run this “Justin Y” thing
Do you ever leave the house?
No moving parts?! 😰
xD
Darn details don't you know.
No, you must remain motionless. Forever.
You don’t think airlines won’t get rid of reclining seats eventually? Hell some airlines are talking about removing seats totally. :P
That would suck cant even relax
That thing looks remarkably similar to some of those dawn of flight era designs
When I was developing atmospheric plasma systems for thin film deposition, I came accross the way one could make very dense plasmas (requiring a lot of amps but not many volts) in standard atmospheric conditions in air. This principle is used in plasma cutters: you make your initial spark using high voltage / low amperage and then, since your plasma is already conductive, you apply a second power source with a lot of amps. When you have a dense plasma in atmorpheric pressure, you can go WAAAY beyond the thrust density you see in MIT's prototype. I though it was a nice invention but then came the bad news: since you ionise air, you leave behind nitric acid, ozone and a bunch of other toxic stuff. It's a pitty we cannot use this engine, even if MIT gets it at some point. I may put it on my channel at some point because it certainly looks great when you see it (plasma is always amazing...)...
Any idea of what sort of thrust to power ratio you get?
I'd think the high current requirement would make it impractical for airplanes.
It would be great to see the device in action. I hope you make a video showing it off.
I think a lot of people would want to see an airplane propelled by a plasma torch even if it's not a practical form of propulsion.
@@ddegn The high voltage is imractical. High amperage low voltage is safe and easy to make. Anyhow, haven't done any testing to see what the thrust to power ratio one gets, will have to at some point revisit this idea and make a video. :)
@@BillDemos I just subbed to your channel. I really hope you get around to making a video on your ion thruster.
@@ddegn Thanks so much! That really helps a new channel! I will try my best to come to this video shortly. For now I need to upload the final video on the CMOS series and then another on Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation so that the channel starts being also on material sciences. Hope you like the content that is coming. Best regards!
I have a plasma cutter, but plasma cutter uses pressurized air and it's that air that gives the thrust and not the plasma! On truth that air is already turned in plasma state but with the same molecular density from air! And the density that causes the thrust! Do you remember the rocket equation?
8:27
That SleeK hand Shake THO
FlawlessOldie was looking for this comment. I knew someone would notice that too
Looks to me like they just launched it off a winch or slingshot and it glided across the room.
Paper airplanes: *am I a joke to you?*
It is a science for paper airplanes. I enjoy it.
Glider: am I a bigger joke??
Bruh moment
Emphasis on "powered flight".
gliders: am i a joke to you?
3:49 "Here on earth it has a completely different set of challenges, Here on earth
planes pose a completely different challenge"
Yes, on earth you have an unlimited source of propellant known as the atmosphere.
@@dag_of_the_west5416 what I was pointing out was that it was two takes/versions of the same line, both left in.
Everybody gangsta until one of the plane’s parts starts moving
You missed one of the HIGHEST benefits of Xenon, low ionization energy. Low ionization energy means less of the total energy input is used ionizing and more is used for acceleration.
Kenneth Ferland yes I don’t understand why they used nitrogen instead on xenon
@@johncauthorn498 My guess is that as he said the benefit of this vs the one in space is that this one doesn't have to carry its own supply of atoms to ionize. Nitrogen is the most common element in the atmosphere so it would make sense for them to try to use that instead of having a supply of xenon on the plane
@@johncauthorn498 because there's no xenon in the surrounding air.
#Bwhahahaha
@@imadmorsli2871 If it worked at all....
Woo! Trying skill share to start the new year. Unfortunately, my life has moving parts, but we're giving it a go.
I tried skillshare - I stopped trying and wrote to them that I want my account deleted. Was actually thoroughly disappointed with their service. For something so well advertised I would expect something more functional. I can get my materials elsewhere right now.
Halcyon where is elsewhere? I want to research multiple viable options.
Also, if you don't mind sharing, what were you disappointed about and felt lacking?
I found skillshare extremely disappointing. I got my account, then proceeded to spend nearly half an hour browsing topics. I didn't find a single thing which interested me, so I scrapped my account less than an hour later. It's just not useful for my needs. I'd rather use open course ware and the like. It's free and has real university lectures on every subject imaginable. Or if you want something more concise, there's Khan Academy.
@@Derpuwolf Basically what Nothing/ said. The exact same experience - just an unorganised stack of study stuff and much of it is actually average quality at best. That's the impression I got out of it so it's really hard to find legit good information there. I mean you could if you wanted to but it's definitely way below it's potential.
@Hmmm Private trackers will circumvent all of this anyway. Education shouldn't be behind paywalls. Even research papers are behind paywalls and for that there is Sci-hub. Knowledge is the only thing advancing us further as a civilization. Well somehow one's got to make a living in life so it's a weird conundrum overall.
Your hands down my favorite channel. Keep up the amazing work.
I'm working on a design with only 1 moving part (related to the propulsion), and research led me here, very cool thank you for sharing
Did you finish it?
*_Wendover Productions wants to know your location_*
I'll fight any man
If I read one more "wants to know your location" or "left the chat" comment I swear I will punch someone.
Dublin, Ireland.
@@sebastianelytron8450 *FBI wants to know your location*
@@sebastianelytron8450 Interpol also wants to know your location.
TIE FIGHTERS ARE ALMOST APON US!!!
Twin
Ion
Engine
Yes, then we can create a grand empire and conquer the galaxy!!
Ion propulsion has extremely low thrust - it could never do what the TIE fighters in the movies do.
It's not a fighter
If I could just get a light sabre.
@kavitha cm good point. Even a warping wing would have moving parts.
Thank you for producing excellent videos. You help bring excitement back to engineering.
8:28 this dude in the left being ignored lol
Hahaha😂😂
RealLifeLore = Toyota Corolla
Wendover Productions = Airplane
Real Engineering = -Rockets- also airplanes?
i suggest you to unsubscribe to RealLifeLore, this guy tells too much cracks
What the hell is a "crack"?
Practical Engineering - Concrete
Na blueprints
Mustard is up there with Real Engineering & grandfather Kurtzegat.
Always thought EHD aircraft were a neat idea, but it's really amazing to see them becoming something more than a novelty.
...On that note, it'd be neat to see a short on variable-buoyancy propulsion, and the submersible vehicles (e.g. Slocum Thermal) and aircraft (UK's Phoenix drone) that use it.
This Valuable Content Well Resumed in less than 10 mins is Priceless
Thank you for Sharing
@RealEngineering I take notes sometimes watching your videos😅. Great work as always. Cheers
"no moving parts"
but... but ... but... that's the opposite direction to making Mechas...
Good lol
need a pilot with a good set of lungs. everyone knows mech power is coupled directly to how loudly pilots is screaming/flailing at the controls
@@jistorian9502 and the power level is directly proportional to the amount of the pilot's childhood friends are dead and or fighting them in their own mech.
I want my GUNDAM...
Not really. If you watch enough anime you could see they use ion wings to fly.
'Having no moving parts is a benefit that can not be overstated" is what he should have said.
Correct....that was the point at which I lost interest.
Great channel. Most informative and inspiring!
This. This is how jet packs.
I better be alive for mass produced, silent, affordable, jet packs Jetsons style.
Duhe duhe duhe duhe duhe duhe
But steel is heavier than feathers.
Imran Ahmadov so what's heavier, a pound of steel or a pound of feathers?
@@greenthizzle4 ha it's a trick the feathers are heavier
@@obamaprism114 nope the feather are heavier you need more to make the same weight and more means heavier
caeden V volume does not equal weight
Dave Tin can I think they're trolling
When you have 1000000 patience in KSP
Or the betterwarp mod installed like others do, so you can travel in the atmosphere or do burns at 30-50 times the normal speed
Weekly Market Review 30 November 2018 During the week ending November 30, global stock indices showed a predominantly positive trend. ASIAN-PACIFIC AREA e-fin.top
@@user-qy9pj6sy8g Bot! Or just (extremely) misplaced advertising, but I feel like calling you a bot.
I wonder if you could optimize the core ion drive structure using AI. Build it from the ground up and optimizing every aspect of it like the air gap and voltage needed to produce the optimal thrust and overcome drag enough for a sustained lift. Could produce a cool hover board like green goblin.
Amazing bro and sweetest tone
What is your view on nuclear fission power on a global scale? I think we should build more modern designed reactors. Or even thorium molten salt reactors.
Uranium and plutonium reactors are not making use of a renewable resource (at least, not in isolation) so given our current problems I don't think it does much for us long term.
Thorium reactors can be made to regenerate the fuel used, so that may have more merit.
It's an open question whether it's worth the effort though.
Nuclear power is expensive. VERY expensive.
Meanwhile, the cost of solar and wind power is has been dropping exponentially over many years and shows no signs of stopping.
Battery prices are also dropping fairly rapidly, which is great for static storage applications.
(energy density of batteries has not improved anywhere near as much, hence why electric aircraft are problematic - since typical fuels currently used still have something like 300 times the effective energy density per unit mass.)
Molten Salt Reactors are the only model we can A) Cool consistently enough and B) Miniaturize enough while maintaining effective shielding.
Our main problem is that we've been building reactors far too big, which makes them vastly more expensive to service and doesn't incentivise shutdown or complete overhaul.
What we need are fission reactors for individual cities not entire states.
@@KuraIthys sure...but the power output of windmills an solar panels compared to the area they take up (their power density) is quite pathetic...
@@KuraIthys
Battery energy density is nowhere near the level where it can be deployed as effectively as we need.
It's just not on the table yet and we're going to need a solution to bridge extended gaps once it does either way.
MSR + Solar + Geothermal + Battery + Biogas + Compressed Air Energy Storage + Pumped Hydro Storage is the ideal mix to pursue.
It's not something to be dogmatic about. Breadth of options beats a singular approach.
I think solar panels are a much better way to go, supplemented with geothermal, hydroelectric, and wind energy in compatible areas. I'd just stick solar panels to every surface exposed to the sun. However, storing the energy is something else.
Nuclear power, I feel, is sort of underdeveloped due to the stigma behind nuclear. We need better reactor designs, fast. Or we need more fuel, but this option only opens up when we get something like asteroid mining.
When an ion engine can carry a person as far as the Wright brothers flew on their first flight I will sit up and take notice, but it's a start.
If you click on the channel icon to the left, you can see one that predates the MIT one with an onboard power supply. That is the start.
Everything starts somewhere, dude.
The first steam engine was a ball with two pipes in it and a fire underneath. Look how far steam engines went. Same with the first gasoline engines, electric motors, and now the first ion engine.
We'll look back on this moment and say "I was there when they first made these!"
@@WinterCharmVT 60 years ago and they still don't work.
The government has tr3b flying triangles, and force us to stay in the technological equivalent of the Stone age with this garbage.
"I'm not impressed by this revolutionary application of physics, tell me when it can benefit me"
Great. Very clear and no music bothering. :-)
This is so exciting , this is just the beginning. The progression of this is going to take people's breath away , along with the simple rather than the complicated : )
"The Plane With No Moving Parts", so how do you get inside it?
HORRIOR: Or control it!
A nano wall like on the Doom film - ua-cam.com/video/Lhs-6en-XK0/v-deo.html
; )
The door could always be open so it doesn't move.
@@michaelhall9138
Control would be easier than you think. Split the electrostatic stuff so that each wing has its own thrust. Increase the total thrust to climb and make one wing have more than the other to turn. With resonant power supplies (like used here) the voltage can be varied while keeping the thing efficient.
@@michaelhall9138 A touch pad
I remember this from the 90s where people made floating triangles
Jepp. It's called Biefeld-Brown effect and was patented in the 1960s.
It even was on Mythbusters... ua-cam.com/video/UCiU96rJJoo/v-deo.html
Well... That is not quite the same... But it's still no moving parts... And it's waaay more efficient.
You sound like a hybrid of DCU Mecatronics and Trinity Theoretical Physics. The vid is great, keep it up!!
that was a terrific segue!
your major mistake is to think of this in terms of improvement on existing applications.
instead you shoould think abaout new applications that can be achived by this technic
Dear Real Engineering, may i ask how you guys are so up to date with the latest technology, is there any particular website or because of relationship with top researchers. Thank you so much and have a nice day
The internet. Dude how old are you.
I love the Wright brother's analogy with this latest tech. Yes isn't a big leap over other ion drives but still in it's infancy. The future looks bright!
Samuel Langley is the only fair analogy. Since MIT did not make the first one with onboard power and they are being promoted as such anyway.
Battery motors are going to be great for gliders and powered hang gliders in which you only want to get up into the thermals and/or get yourself out of a tight situation when you have misjudged the wind currents.
Art Bell did a levitating ion drive "drone" years ago. It takes a metric crapton of electricity, and it produces a crapton of ozone. This may be a greatly refined version of that, but I'm still very skeptical.
Yeah, people see the words "solid state" or "ion drive" and lose their minds 😆
It's just a mega-upscaled ionic breeze air freshener. We had one at home and all it really did was pull dust out of the air.
I went to a restaurant once that had an industrial "air purifier" (ozone generator with fan). I felt absolutely nauseous.
I think we got a way to solve the ozone layer problem
Not only ozone. It will create even bigger amounts of NOx. Unhealthy in every way.
@@HB-et5iv Good to know!
@@HB-et5iv shit
science channels : masters of sponsorship segways
*segues
Skillant... They love em
There are about 40 videos of the first and only solely ion propelled aircrafts that specifically are patented for having onboard power on my channel (since 2014). They are capable of VTOL flight for up to about 2 minutes and are tremendously more efficient. They were patented in 2014, and widely published and verified, for lifting their power supplies against Earth's gravity.
I love the engineering mindset: get excited, explore the possibilities, then swiftly shit on it for all its issues....good, keep staying hopeful but grounded in reality.
Cheers from another engineer
me: ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, so that's how they do it
mom later: so what did you learn on the computer?
me: uhhhhhhhh
so expect ion planes 30 years after commercial fusion, self driving cars, the manned mission to Europa and quantum computing in desktops?
self driving cars... are already here: ua-cam.com/video/8H5tjNimoBs/v-deo.html
basically except for self driving crashmobiles. NEVER. Ok #COLDFUSION.
Seems legit
Self-driving cars? Checked.
Quantum desktops? Kinda... You can request quantum computing time through IBM cloud, including from your PC.
Fusion power? 69% ready. Literally, that's the Q value of the JET reactor. Just give it few more years, it'll get to 100%.
Mission to Europa? That's a tad more difficult than the rest of your milestones, but we're working on it one step at a time. For now - we're building a Moon base. In 5-10 years, when we have an outpost there, then we'll think about Mars, Europa and everything beyond.
Ion planes sound absurd, but maybe they have a future?
Absolutely Fabulous 💯
One day people will except that we mastered Electro gravitics in the late 40's.
I can't wait until we can combine ion propulsion with a kind of railgun mass driver to launch sky jumper ships that could reach low orbit. Lok
Most efficient way is to use a hydrogen ballon, not a rail gun. And then, yes, ion propulsion...
Could this be used to keep air passing over a stalling wing going smoothly without much power or drag, allowing for higher angles of attack?
vruh Harvard is looking for you
hmmmmmmmmm.....Possibly!
The ion wind produced by this is not actual wind or air flow so no, it cant.
It could, but VGs require no power
Ionocraft: we don't need wings.
I like the way you make the airfoil asymmetric
I love this video thank you
Idk what is more impressive. Xenon fueled propulsion or A.I. engineered geometry. Wouldn't mind dabbling in either subject.
Gotta try this in KSP
Ion engine in kerbal space program is 2 kilo newton.
I don't think ions work in the atmosphere anymore
Loved the video.
this is the greatest explanation i have seen
The first heavier than air ion propelled aircraft of any kind to carry its power supply has already been flown long before the MIT craft... The earlier ion propelled aircraft can lift its complete onboard power supply vertically from the ground for about 2 minutes....
You can see the 5 public videos of the patented invention in flight, by clicking on the purple channel icon to the left.
I love the comment, no moving parts, I want to move my seat, we need more humor in our lives, good job
Japanese were also conducting ion engine research since long back. How much have they succeeded is no known. Thanks for this clip.
I've always wanted to build one of these
Don't usually comment on videos unless I have a lot of respect for the creator and think I can help the community. I'm an aerospace engineer currently working on manned EVOTL. What you said about power required scaling as the square of mass is not correct and the equation at 7:36 is misleading and taken out of context. I'm not commenting to flame mental superiority, it's just that you're removing interest a technology that will soon greatly improve the world by telling your 1.5M subscribers that electric aviation doesn't scale when the truth is that is scales really well.
Please see the patented "Self Contained Ion Powered Aircraft" www.electronairllc.org@Wet Johnny
I was teaching but now only work at electronairllc.org
@@carlstovermusic
Thanks for standing up for the tech! If you don't already know? there is an earlier ion propelled aircraft with onboard power. If you click on the purple icon to the left, you can see some rough prototypes in flight.
When the nitrogen is ionised, does it react with the oxygen in the air and does the plane leave a trail of nitric acid vapor behind?
hopefully yes
MIT is working on real-life Chemtrails!
Unfortunately yes. I have made an atmospheric plasma drive of 2KW based on plasma cutter principles. The problem is what you mentioned. So even if MIT get's it and gets beyond the mW range they are in, they will come face to face with this unfortunate fact...
and ozone, probably.
Probably depends on energy level of the ions. There are home ionisers which are carefully tuned to avoid generating ozone or nitric oxides. I have one, it also makes slight breeze without moving parts.
Segue skills on point
That's so crazy!!
US Patent Number 10,119,527. Please see it fly with onboard power using only ion propulsion before the MIT version.
You're a genius!
@@delwyngomes4640
Thanks Delwyn,
I think I'm just an enthusiast that put a lot of time into it. It's mainly just focusing on one thing and keeping at it. There are still lots of exciting improvements to come if we are lucky.
Best regards:).
"No moving parts"…? Dude, the _whole plane_ moves.
The 'parts' don't
Depending on whose perspective. People on board the plane would say claim the ground and everything else moves
Hahahahahaha you are also right my friend hahahahaha
@@niravjhaveri ya we all know that already after watching the same video you watched.... Hahahaha
@@niravjhaveri r/whooosh
very interesting topic, keep it up :))
overstated
"It will never lead to anything viable"... spoke I, 110 years ago, as I watched the silly Wrights toy with their useless aeroplane!!!
Much better technology will be out soon. I just need to work on my flux capacitor.
I am a physicist and now doing my MS in global navigation satellite systems.
I watch videos of real engineering regularly and love every single one of them.
I am really interested to learn about this channel.
Please let me know is this channel owned by a single individual or a team?
How do you know about so many topics.
What is your method of research or study for such topics because you usually explain with so many details.
This is a dream planes for high/mid dense populated area!
That technology will be very unfull on Titan or other planets with high atmospheric density!
'who knows where we'll be in 100 years time?' -I do - dead.
It said we as in humanity not you
-14 subscribers with no videos He’s still right. If things don’t change. We as in humanity will be dead.
Well historically as medical technology advances people live longer, perhaps this century it may be common for people to live 100 years.
Nice meta-segue at the end there
Please note, there is a much earlier patented ion propelled aircraft with onboard power. If you're interested, please google US Patent 10,119,527 for more details. This earlier series of aircrafts can fly vertically or horizontally with their onboard power supplies for about 2 minutes.
4:40 So it's just an h bridge and a few cockroft walton voltage multipliers. Hardly cutting edge. This stuff's been around for decades.
The only novelty is actually constructing it with modern, light enough components and battery that it can be actually carried aloft by the engine it powers. But that sounds a heck of lot less impressive so yay PR...
Look more carefully at the multipliers and see that they have twice the diodes of a Cockroft-Walton design. It is not a good design.
You don't seem to understand energy density and seem to be ignoring what the video said about how the weight icreases disproportionately to the lift you can produce. They're not going to make anything commercially viable that runs on lipo batteries. This stuff's been around since the 60's. If it were practical, somebody would have done it.
Having played hundreds of hours of Kerbal Space Program, I know how hard it can be to make an ion plane.
The difference being, I can't even manage that in KSP, and here these guys did in in real life where the rules of (and problems with) it are literally on a different magnitude o_o
BloodyRain2k I’m skeptical it really flys. Seems more like it glides a bit further than no power.
To be fair this is a bit different to the ion drives in ksp. Same principal, different execution.
not at all - here it's only a projection of imagination, not any accurate nor precission account of what is really possible to build and use NOW! (not mention our very limited knowledge about space, mass and time, as well as so called 'cosmic vacuum' properties... And Cosmic Space as a whole... so, we can as well laugh all together - we are dreamers! Well, well, well...
@@fidziek Love that #TESLAroadster in Orbit. NOT.
Pongan el aluminio de las alas,sólo desde el borde de ataque y un poco más hacia abajo, también inclinen para arriba las alas unos 2 ó 3 grados y así aumentaría la sustentación y disminuye un poco el peso de las alas
This is good for extended recon missions when the government want to watch you for a long period of time.
1) the Mach number is measured locally. You cannot say a spacecraft is travelling at Mach x because you don't know what the speed of sound is in those conditions.
2)ionic wind is not caused by an alternating current.
2) They do have an inverter onboard but it simply does create AC for the transformer which feeds output its output voltage into an multistage voltage multiplier which makes it DC again....
I think by Mach 8 he meant 8x the speed of sound on Earth.
Certainly a valid complaint, and a misuse of the term, but it's still not hard to figure out the meaning.
While not the correct use of the terminology, it's clearly being used as multiples of the speed of sound at sea level in a standard atmosphere.
Which is an incorrect definition, but... Not a difficult one for anyone to understand... unless you're extremely pedantic of course.
Ah well, in that case we need to divide by zero and we gonna break the universe.
Real Engineering just pointed it out because people don't know it and assume that the speed of sound is always ~340m/s
Amazing engineering! This shows that there are Edison, Tesla, and Einstein intellects in our generation.
Edison was a liar and an asshole
Einstein was an asshole to his wife
@@luongmaihunggia everyone who made a difference with science was those things.
@@archiecoolsdown5854 being a genius does not justify being an asshole.
Those ions are REALLY moving!!!
That smooth transition to the sponsor tho damn
Waiting a year for this spaceship to really get going....
7:51 isn´t the v in the drag formula squarded ?
Yes for drag force.
It is cubed for power.
If the air was more viscous, there would be a linear component to drag force.
It sounds like polarized haul's of ships like star trek, in which various energy signiture's could be promoted on such haul's. This would allow intake and out take of energy ions.
This would allow possible communication signiture's and shielding potential off the haul to be emitted. It's neat that electric propelled planes move, in a earth atmosphere. With the right tuning, it could possibly move it through other environment's like outer space. This would allow a vessel, or object to thrust movement entirely all at once from a polarized haul. Or entirely all at once, to have communication signal's emitted from the whole polarized haul.
This in theory, should also work for nano bot's as well, as they could mimic that feature of polarized haul's. Nano bot's could move around and through environment's. As they thrust, or hover through environment's.
Also if nano bot's emitted the right energy signiture's, or signal's. They could be detected from devices and communication with them from other devices would be possible. Cloaking would be possible as well, for those polarized haul's. As they could be blending in microwaves and other possible background noises, to have it appear normal. The only thing really, is to have polarized haul's charged well enough. For strong energy field dynamics of interaction's to be in the environment.
Everything is like torus Field's, or alternating current fluctuation's. I like another name for this, force balance.
Thanks! This technology has a lot of promise, but I somehow doubt that it will have any impact on the airline industry for the foreseeable future. I suppose it could be used to augment thrust. I'm thinking more along the lines of dirigibles. An airship with some wings (or even rings) would be able - possibly - to cruise along pretty well, seeing as how it's already afloat. As far as space propulsion tech goes, I have a very, very strong opinion that what we need (for manned flights, certainly) is a kind of hybrid system that can provide several different types of thrust as needed. A spaceship that could fire something like rockets, nuclear fission, etc., to get going initially, could then use ion thrust to continue accelerating during a longer voyage. It would then use the bigger thrust to slow down again at the destination (or to maneuver for any other reason). I know that if I were in space, I'd want a ship that could 'burn' just about anything, in any way; a bit like Mr. Fusion from Back to the Future! Ideally, we'd have a system that could use oxygen/hydrogen, or methane, or anything that could be mined, scooped up, or acquired in some other way. Of course, the perfect space engine would simply need any generic 'reaction mass' - but that's even farther away. For space travel - manned or unmanned - I think we need to stop specializing so much in this engine OR that engine, and concentrate on versatility! But speaking of the Wright Brothers flight, what *_really_* blows my mind is the ludicrously short amount of time between the first powered "aeroplane", and Neil Armstrong landing on the Moon! Yes, I know we had *_two_* World Wars in that span - and that wars always forward technological innovation (after all, we always need the latest, niftiest way to kill the other guys!) - but still... it boggles the mind. Thanks again. tavi.
I believe you are really interested in this subject, and I like your ideas as well! Please click on my channel to the left, to see more advanced independently verified earlier ion propulsion(with onboard power)!