Ten Things I Learned From Shakespeare

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 47

  • @ernestmendez5487
    @ernestmendez5487 3 роки тому +31

    Perhaps I missed out on some things since I didn't go to college. But this was the most satisfying lecture on Shakespeare I've witnessed. And it's better than many of the essay's I've read on the subject. And it's simply because Witmore loves Shakespeare, as I do. And although I'm not as well read as I'd like to be when it comes to Shakespeare; what I find remarkable is how I've learned many of these "things" from Dostoevsky. Who of course, was a great admirer of his. And it's also interesting how Dostoevsky expanded on Shakespeare's ideas: the essence of hope; the essence of forgiveness; the great power and great deficiency of language; and a true belief in human beings, and consequently, a great belief in art. What's remarkable to me is how some the phrases Witmore uses echoes some great ideas I've come across during my curious exploration in literature; ideas that I've echoed in my own work. "Realm of fantasy" which I've only come across in Balzac, when he comments that it's perhaps higher than art. And "dreamy exclusion." An idea that encapsulates human perception. Gogol's character in Nevsky Prospekt lives in a dream and chooses to waste away because of how wonderful his imagination is. PKD obviously played around quite a bit with this idea as well. Many of Dostoevsky's characters exist in a sort of dreamy exclusion, living in their imaginations (though many of these characters live in terror, willful-silence, pathological degeneracy, bewilderment, or a senseless stupor). And it too often leads to willful domination or self-destruction or madness. I did take notes on this lecture when I was drunk, so I had more to say. But I threw them away in a weak fit of doubt.

    • @khaled4543
      @khaled4543 3 роки тому +6

      What was really wonderful beside this lecture is your comment ! Thank you both

    • @MN8
      @MN8 2 роки тому +3

      you write good

  • @cor-z8m
    @cor-z8m 2 роки тому +10

    Can never get enough of Shakespeare! Brilliant.

  • @jeffreygraham7525
    @jeffreygraham7525 3 роки тому +9

    Very revealing. I am newly resolved to make a pilgrimage to the John Carter Brown Library first chance I get... and to read and see more Shakespeare.

    • @michaellear6904
      @michaellear6904 3 роки тому +1

      Shakespeare, the finest poet, playwright author and philosopher to ever live. All of life is to be found in Shakespeare.

    • @czesiek09
      @czesiek09 2 роки тому

      Yep. Right behind Edmund Spenser. 😎

  • @davidphillips1577
    @davidphillips1577 5 років тому +4

    Michael...I want you to know you are one of at least 20 people on UA-cam to comment on Shakespeare...AND you ring clearer than any of the others. Thank you.

    • @ahmadhasan8355
      @ahmadhasan8355 3 роки тому

      sir, would you name some others, please?

  • @petermladinic8249
    @petermladinic8249 2 роки тому +5

    What a great lecture. Such lucid ideas well supported with examples from the plays.

  • @yorkshireroots
    @yorkshireroots 3 роки тому +4

    Really excellent lecture

  • @bijumathew4721
    @bijumathew4721 3 роки тому +6

    Erudite and inspiring lecture

  • @marinamaccagni5253
    @marinamaccagni5253 5 років тому +3

    Michael witmore, awesome shakespearean lecture!

  • @muhammadhamzawarraich1630
    @muhammadhamzawarraich1630 6 років тому +18

    Hi anyone here student of English literature and language

  • @paulsolon6229
    @paulsolon6229 2 роки тому +1

    The first speaker introduces the actual speaker. He starts off his introduction w “aaah uhm, uhm uhm”

    • @liedersanger1
      @liedersanger1 9 місяців тому

      Yes, no one missed that, dummy…

  • @gordonpepper1400
    @gordonpepper1400 4 роки тому +4

    That was very impressive

  • @TheWhitehiker
    @TheWhitehiker 4 роки тому +6

    lecture starts at c. 5.00; intro unappealing. Doesnt get substantive until about 10.00

  • @haruki5401
    @haruki5401 3 роки тому +4

    If after this, you don't explore Shakespeare...I don't know..

  • @bettinadelsesto9088
    @bettinadelsesto9088 2 роки тому +1

    Wow!

  • @wetalksports1128
    @wetalksports1128 2 роки тому +2

    6:30
    התבונה של ספרות
    9:18
    אתה צריך ליצור בכדי לבצע דברים
    אתה צריך לעשות משהו ממה שיש לך
    תמיד מכל הכלים שיש לך זה ליצור ממה שיש לך בזה הרגע.
    12:00
    האפשרות תברח לך במידה ולא תתפוס בה
    15:30
    צריך לעשות משהו למרות אי ידיעת העובדות
    19:10
    Have in complete information and do something about it
    21:00
    Repution is a bubble and it's physically pooped

    • @desertari
      @desertari 2 роки тому

      מה הקשר עם ההרצאה ?

  • @lasanbangpraxay7592
    @lasanbangpraxay7592 6 років тому +2

    A person propose a marriage in front of Shakespeare's book lol... The book must be worth a serious sum of money.

  • @apollocobain8363
    @apollocobain8363 11 місяців тому +1

    14:30 still waiting for the first thing he learned. "seize opportunity..." 15:40 #2 "Shakespeare knew that decisions must be made in the absence of all the facts" Quotes a bunch of Hamlet. Hamlet takes incomplete information and kills 6 people. Stabs through a curtain, etc. "makes drama" 21:00 "Reputation is a bubble and that it is easily popped."
    #5 "Close cover before striking" #6 "Your seat cushion acts as a flotation device" #7 "Objects in mirror are bigger than they appear" #8 "You don't choose the thug life -- Thug life chooses you." #9 "All the other kids with their pumped up kicks they better run better run" #10 "Lose yourself in the music, the music" because of your mom's spaghetti.

  • @MrScopophiliac
    @MrScopophiliac 2 роки тому +1

    Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything.

  • @AndrewLeigh-v1l
    @AndrewLeigh-v1l 10 місяців тому

    ,,,, THE LINE IN MERCHANT OF VENICE IS ALL THAT GLISTERS GLISTERS,,,,, NOT GLITTERS act 2 scene 7

  • @70galaxie
    @70galaxie 2 роки тому

    if 'e says "jazz" once more i'm shutting it off

  • @senrom2273
    @senrom2273 5 років тому +9

    Of course the presentation would degenerate into a Democratic campaign event, and all of the New England cognoscenti would go atwitter at each remark to signal their wisdom to each other. Shakespeare saw through these people too.

    • @joevass3196
      @joevass3196 3 роки тому +2

      Exactly. Tiresome, really. The speaker loves Shakespeare, but like his listeners, is too lacking in self-awareness to apply the lessons to himself.

    • @Slechy_Lesh
      @Slechy_Lesh 2 роки тому +2

      Brit here. You're both as bad as each other.

    • @MN8
      @MN8 2 роки тому

      ​@@Slechy_Lesh they are not bad, they are letting the stuffy air out of the room

    • @dorothywillis1
      @dorothywillis1 2 роки тому

      I was afraid that was going to happen. That's why I left.

    • @dorothywillis1
      @dorothywillis1 2 роки тому

      @@Slechy_Lesh You don't understand. The topic is supposed to be Shakespeare. He should respect his audience enough to let them make any connections to current events for themselves.

  • @dorothywillis1
    @dorothywillis1 2 роки тому

    I'm afraid I left when he started to mention modern political situations. That is a very sore subject for me, and I don't want to take the chance that he is going to say something that will upset me. Sorry to be so frail, but it's the truth.

    • @desertari
      @desertari 2 роки тому

      I understand your reluctance but really, it was quite OK and didn't get too political although there was one smart-alecky comment by the moderator right at the end. At one point Witmore alluded to the "unequal recognition of unequal justice" but that was it. So listen again all the way through- it is brilliant !

    • @desertari
      @desertari 2 роки тому

      OK- I listened to the lecture again and didn't pick up on anything divisive- can you let me know where it kicked in?

  • @Reasonable6
    @Reasonable6 2 роки тому +1

    it is not whom you know as Shakespeare was written by one Fracias Bacon.

    • @desertari
      @desertari 2 роки тому

      That's changing the subject- not the time or place to re-open an old debate.

    • @Nullifidian
      @Nullifidian 2 роки тому +2

      Then who wrote the works of Francis Bacon? Because the only way Bacon can be Shakespeare is if he _didn't_ write the works under his name. His works and Shakespeare's exist in different aesthetic universes.