You sir are the one who actually deserves the "like" and "subscription". Your videos always guide me for a further reading, in order to properly answer an essay question.
So that would be like telling your psychiatrist that you believe you're under some kind of investigation and people are following you around and they are tipped off that you are under investigation and try to lead you to believe that you are paranoid?
Marcus hello. Thanks for this my next assignment is due in March on something similar. Controlled mechanisms to restrict liability when dealing with claims by secondary victims for psychiatric injuries. Are there any other videos you could recommend? Or books on this? Thanks keep safe
Note for ppl watching: UKSC handed down Paul v royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust this year which changes stuff. What stuff? I am not really sure but definitely stuff. Hope this helps!
So does Alcock essentially say that psychiatric injury is based of the reasonable person in those circumstances i.e., how would a reasonable police officer have reacted to the harm?
A psychiatrist isn't supposed to be less sane than a patient. Why would anyone continue trying to cause harm to a former client, who is also a DV victim? That's how you lose your license and your job.
You sir are the one who actually deserves the "like" and "subscription". Your videos always guide me for a further reading, in order to properly answer an essay question.
Thanks very much, that really means a lot!
@@marcuscleaver You're more than welcome.
You're videos are the reason I passed my first year
I like the way you explain things. Straight to the point and very clear. Thank you so much
Literal lifesaver!! You make so much sense! Thank you for the videos!
Is that the lad? Bloody hero son
So that would be like telling your psychiatrist that you believe you're under some kind of investigation and people are following you around and they are tipped off that you are under investigation and try to lead you to believe that you are paranoid?
Yes.
Marcus hello. Thanks for this my next assignment is due in March on something similar. Controlled mechanisms to restrict liability when dealing with claims by secondary victims for psychiatric injuries.
Are there any other videos you could recommend? Or books on this? Thanks keep safe
Haha 😂 you don’t happen to be at open university do you? I have the exact same question due in March which is why I’m here as well!!!
@@eirenex233 yep open university Eirene best of luck
@@eirenex233 how did the TMA 4 go?mine😔
Aw I’m sorry you weren’t happy with results 😔 it was a hard topic. I havnt got my results yet - still waiting
Also It was an essay plan - which I think can be tricky as I’m not always sure how much to add!
Thank you I can't appreciate more
i love your channel i am a law student in Jamaica this was very helpful.Do you have the hard copy of this information
how did it go
Note for ppl watching: UKSC handed down Paul v royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust this year which changes stuff. What stuff? I am not really sure but definitely stuff. Hope this helps!
So does Alcock essentially say that psychiatric injury is based of the reasonable person in those circumstances i.e., how would a reasonable police officer have reacted to the harm?
Thank You
Hi, i am a law student. I had a question, can A who has caused physical harm B, then claim for suffering PTSD? and what remedy will he receive?
Depends on the circumstances. Check out the principles in Alcock v Chief Constable. That should give you the guidance you need.
@@marcuscleaver I think you should consider "ex turpi causa non oritur actio" for no one should benefit from his or her own wrongful act.
A psychiatrist isn't supposed to be less sane than a patient.
Why would anyone continue trying to cause harm to a former client, who is also a DV victim? That's how you lose your license and your job.
Is death a physiatric damage/injury?
Enjoy listening to ur videos, if I want to understand something
Thanks to education
really good. Thank you
www
The date for the case of Bourhill v Young is incorrect, it should be 1943 instead of 1983.
Your videos are helpful, Thanks
Thanks for the correction Hagop, can always rely on you! ;)