I just started playing about a month ago, for me auto aim works for less than 25% of the shells. Ive noticed that i typically have to lead 3/4- a full ship length in the direction of travel to get a good hit. Auto aim for blind lobbing shells on ships behind islands, other than that use it to get snapped to the ballpark aiming area, then finetune your shot
Wait, people actually fire their guns using auto aim? Im a new player, only been here 3-4 weeks and i just assumed that "auto aim" was placing you in the rough area of your target so you didnt need to spend 5-10 seconds panning to them manually. I always readjust wherever it aims me and had no idea people actually use it to aim for them.. 😂
This again. Auto aim is a tool. Like all tools, you can use it correctly and get good results or you can misuse it and get crap results. Granted, the community is largely incapable of doing anything correctly, but if you're capable of learning it can help you achieve superior results. Players should have figured this out by T5, but, well, we all know how the playerbase is.
sometimes I wonder if peek remembers what lock on target does. the fact what being named auto aim isn't really auto-aim lol just zooming into center of your screen reticle and it moving the aiming reticle in line of center mass lock on which is being tracked and only input required from player is aiming. just about manual aiming if it was auto all peek need to do is don't move the left stick and lock on a ship then fire (no manual aim ) besides lock on just keeps track of center mass of the ship and track it .( while redusing dispersion to normal levels if no lock on to a ship is active gun dispersion is 200%/ x2 larger then normal.) rest is lead and manual aiming and understanding ship shell trajectory and weight but that more in-depth stuff that plays a big factor in landing where you aiming. hopefullly peek will fully understand what basic info someday as these types of vids can be miss leading and troublesome.
Agree with most of what is stated here. However, none of you specify the value of the RNG. This is found in many games, few have an RNG that includes Spread,Pen,Dmg and other hidden values of the game provider that apply here. This value is hidden from all users by the game provider and Autoaim is the tool for the lazy user who doesn't understand or take the time to learn the basics. This development of today's game has several years behind it, when the game developers include their business idea and which feature is best to maximize the income from than RNG and the areas affected by it. If you are naive and think that you as a user can adapt to the degree that you land 90% of your volleys on a target, then it is up to you. Public statistics are available for various skeeps/tanks/other and what margin of victory they have. The most common value is ~ 50% which even all developers consider is to achieve a balanced level in their games. This particular game provider has many different values of RNG, which means that the skill cap increases, not lower, as a Vet does not know all the actual values that are actually in the game that are affected by RNG. The RNG value is in most cases too high for games from this developer. If we look at the "new" games that are developed from other developers "competitors", they have chosen to target the critical things that the user of this game/other games they deliver. The value of a Premium account, RNG, Skill and fair play where the games of the future are supposed to combine the Fun factor with a sustainable Business idea that is not one-sided and frustrating for the user, namely increasing market shares from this supplier and EA-Sport e.i., without introducing loot boxes and game-addicting features and so on and on...
@@billjohansson88 RNG is RNG. You're not getting away from it in these sorts of games. WoWS isn't strictly a simulation, but it's roots are there. Historically naval gun accuracy is quite low. The time period that much of the game covers saw hit rates of around 5-6 percent--and that's good accuracy. Many examples exist of far worse.
true about rng , and it pretty much a given knowledge thing sure i didn't point it out in my response . ngl that alot of text wall, thanks for paragraphing it to which made it easy to read. @@billjohansson88
I've always felt auto aim on the BB class like Kansas hurts her significantly more compared to other classes of ships like cruisers due to the obvious high alpha strike potential, long reload speed.
WoWSL is very unsatisfying only using auto-aim. But, my bigger concern is how inconsistent dispersion is. I've watched you play Georgia before with great dispersion and not so much in these games. The game seems to be very selective, one team good dispersion, the other team poor dispersion. Today I may be amazed at how good it is, the next day it's completely non-existent on the same ship. Now, If my first game has bad dispersion, I do something else. The frustration isn't Worth!
I just use AP when they’re broadside or slightly angled, they’ll give you broadside eventually but there are cases where you gotta switch to HE, I don’t think you can hit a citadel if the rear or bow is pointing towards you, or when someone is at an odd angle but you just predict when he’s going to turn based on his patterns and you’ll pop his ass, when you shoot he’ll be at an odd angle but based on your observation by the time the shells get to him he’ll be broadside.
At 6 min. into the game, you've landed 6 shots and haven't launched a single spotter to help with dispersion... it's players like you who run to the ends of the map, and just aren't pulling their weight in the game. You were nowhere near the BB to lend help (Will to rebuild). There's nothing really wrong with auto-aim. I used very successfully landing most shells on broadside ships.
yesterday i shot a dd from 17km out.....if only my team cooperated.....also watched a dd guide and did well.....acc to my service record i avg 4kills a game
yeah bro i feel the pain during this z44 campaign, ships that have no business penning or dev striking are doing just that lol ; it feels like american ships got a lil dispersion nerf or enemy ships are running anti dispersion builds, cuz all of a sudden alot of my ships of any class shoot like an italian bb. i have to vary my shots to get cits.
I think they did Nerf the Georgia several campaigns ago when I first got the Georgia it was a beast and then they nursed it and now I'm getting like a 50% accuracy it's almost become Japanese sometimes it hits and then sometimes they're all over the place
I have to say... these days the game has got so bad that the frustration has made me play less focused... and I potato much more often than I used to. I probably should get a break, don't want to be that guy that always ruins everyone else's game for his incapacity
Or in my older years. It lets me play again because keyboards are not so easy anymore Many players need improvement. They cry about the game. Subs. Depth charges. ? Games just begun
This actually made me feel good as a newer player. I've adjusted my aim since the very beginning.
same....i played for two months before i even knew about it...
The auto selection pisses me off up close when I want to do a drive by. Even worse when there are two ships near each other and it freaks out.
I just started playing about a month ago, for me auto aim works for less than 25% of the shells. Ive noticed that i typically have to lead 3/4- a full ship length in the direction of travel to get a good hit. Auto aim for blind lobbing shells on ships behind islands, other than that use it to get snapped to the ballpark aiming area, then finetune your shot
Wait, people actually fire their guns using auto aim? Im a new player, only been here 3-4 weeks and i just assumed that "auto aim" was placing you in the rough area of your target so you didnt need to spend 5-10 seconds panning to them manually. I always readjust wherever it aims me and had no idea people actually use it to aim for them.. 😂
10:17 oh my god the Kansas just died 😂
This again. Auto aim is a tool. Like all tools, you can use it correctly and get good results or you can misuse it and get crap results. Granted, the community is largely incapable of doing anything correctly, but if you're capable of learning it can help you achieve superior results. Players should have figured this out by T5, but, well, we all know how the playerbase is.
sometimes I wonder if peek remembers what lock on target does.
the fact what being named auto aim isn't really auto-aim lol just zooming into center of your screen reticle and it moving the aiming reticle in line of center mass lock on which is being tracked and only input required from player is aiming.
just about manual aiming if it was auto all peek need to do is don't move the left stick and lock on a ship then fire (no manual aim ) besides lock on just keeps track of center mass of the ship and track it .( while redusing dispersion to normal levels if no lock on to a ship is active gun dispersion is 200%/ x2 larger then normal.)
rest is lead and manual aiming and understanding ship shell trajectory and weight but that more in-depth stuff that plays a big factor in landing where you aiming.
hopefullly peek will fully understand what basic info someday as these types of vids can be miss leading and troublesome.
Agree with most of what is stated here. However, none of you specify the value of the RNG. This is found in many games, few have an RNG that includes Spread,Pen,Dmg and other hidden values of the game provider that apply here. This value is hidden from all users by the game provider and Autoaim is the tool for the lazy user who doesn't understand or take the time to learn the basics.
This development of today's game has several years behind it, when the game developers include their business idea and which feature is best to maximize the income from than RNG and the areas affected by it. If you are naive and think that you as a user can adapt to the degree that you land 90% of your volleys on a target, then it is up to you.
Public statistics are available for various skeeps/tanks/other and what margin of victory they have. The most common value is ~ 50% which even all developers consider is to achieve a balanced level in their games. This particular game provider has many different values of RNG, which means that the skill cap increases, not lower, as a Vet does not know all the actual values that are actually in the game that are affected by RNG.
The RNG value is in most cases too high for games from this developer. If we look at the "new" games that are developed from other developers "competitors", they have chosen to target the critical things that the user of this game/other games they deliver. The value of a Premium account, RNG, Skill and fair play where the games of the future are supposed to combine the Fun factor with a sustainable Business idea that is not one-sided and frustrating for the user, namely increasing market shares from this supplier and EA-Sport e.i., without introducing loot boxes and game-addicting features and so on and on...
@@billjohansson88 RNG is RNG. You're not getting away from it in these sorts of games. WoWS isn't strictly a simulation, but it's roots are there. Historically naval gun accuracy is quite low. The time period that much of the game covers saw hit rates of around 5-6 percent--and that's good accuracy. Many examples exist of far worse.
true about rng , and it pretty much a given knowledge thing sure i didn't point it out in my response .
ngl that alot of text wall, thanks for paragraphing it to which made it easy to read. @@billjohansson88
I give you credit for actually having the time to type this out as a reply with a well thought out knowledge and opinion@@billjohansson88 👏
You better not quit and push through boi. I need your content
Breaths in... BISMARCK IN MOTION A BEAST MADE OF STEEL! sorry peek I had to.😅
And how to turn off auto aim, do you say how in the video???
I've always felt auto aim on the BB class like Kansas hurts her significantly more compared to other classes of ships like cruisers due to the obvious high alpha strike potential, long reload speed.
I have noticed it is getting worse where you have to adjust a lot more now. I usually adjust at least half a tick to a full tick on the reticle.
I didn't realize that the game had auto aim till one day I realized that my aim was getting adjusted every time I aimed down
WoWSL is very unsatisfying only using auto-aim. But, my bigger concern is how inconsistent dispersion is. I've watched you play Georgia before with great dispersion and not so much in these games. The game seems to be very selective, one team good dispersion, the other team poor dispersion. Today I may be amazed at how good it is, the next day it's completely non-existent on the same ship. Now, If my first game has bad dispersion, I do something else. The frustration isn't Worth!
Funny how that works right? Who would make a video game that works that way? But you’re spot on.
Auto-Aim helps me a lot with broadside targets scoring easy citadels. But for the most part people need to learn how lead at odd angles.
That’s what she said.
I just use AP when they’re broadside or slightly angled, they’ll give you broadside eventually but there are cases where you gotta switch to HE, I don’t think you can hit a citadel if the rear or bow is pointing towards you, or when someone is at an odd angle but you just predict when he’s going to turn based on his patterns and you’ll pop his ass, when you shoot he’ll be at an odd angle but based on your observation by the time the shells get to him he’ll be broadside.
I'm here for confirmation bias sir😂
The second game the vladivostock is me 😂 i laugh a lot for the tulsa. I dont know what he think.
Greogia recently is shooting like a secondary build bb every now and then. 😮💨
Only 7 months into the game but I have never relied/realised they was auto aim
At 6 min. into the game, you've landed 6 shots and haven't launched a single spotter to help with dispersion... it's players like you who run to the ends of the map, and just aren't pulling their weight in the game. You were nowhere near the BB to lend help (Will to rebuild). There's nothing really wrong with auto-aim. I used very successfully landing most shells on broadside ships.
thank you for bringing your 42%wr knowledge to the table
yesterday i shot a dd from 17km out.....if only my team cooperated.....also watched a dd guide and did well.....acc to my service record i avg 4kills a game
Not using auto aim netted me 31,000 damage playing in the Omaha floating citadel.
yeah bro i feel the pain during this z44 campaign, ships that have no business penning or dev striking are doing just that lol ; it feels like american ships got a lil dispersion nerf or enemy ships are running anti dispersion builds, cuz all of a sudden alot of my ships of any class shoot like an italian bb. i have to vary my shots to get cits.
You had me at gooch
Georgia definitely feels weird even for me, Alabama still consistant but Georgia feels like a french BB for some reason.
Glad I'm not the only one noticing my Georgia is playing funny. I couldn't hit the floor with my hat with that thing lately.
Auto aim is annoying to use in any "shooter".
Destiny 2 probably have the worst auto aiming ever and you can't disable it.
I think they did Nerf the Georgia several campaigns ago when I first got the Georgia it was a beast and then they nursed it and now I'm getting like a 50% accuracy it's almost become Japanese sometimes it hits and then sometimes they're all over the place
Auto aim works when someone is " white line kiting".
Only auto aim at 17km+ behind massive islands where you can’t even see target.
I've been playing since the the game launched and I never knew there was auto aim🤦♂
Didnt even know that aruto aim was a thing, I always tweak it a bit
Because it shouldn't be there
Gotta say. I love my Georgia, but I've noticed at times she can be a troll.
I pretty much always use auto aim and get min 8 citadels a game with a high of 17… Baltimore or flandre and my captains are level 11….
the mini map at largest setting is your friend.
I use auto aik just as a base to fine tune my aim according to the situation
I quit playing for awhile and went to No Man's Sky lol
The sad truth is, RNG is so strong in all the wrong places that the game just isnt as fun. I look forward to subs because of this lol
I didn't even know that it existed in wows
Wait what........there's AutoAim? No sir, I think it's just called sprayNpray
Now you know how do french battleships players feel 🤣😂
I have to say... these days the game has got so bad that the frustration has made me play less focused... and I potato much more often than I used to. I probably should get a break, don't want to be that guy that always ruins everyone else's game for his incapacity
worst thing that happened to WOWS was PS and Xbox. Dumbed the game down for the kiddies
Or in my older years. It lets me play again because keyboards are not so easy anymore Many players need improvement. They cry about the game. Subs. Depth charges. ? Games just begun
90%? X to doubt
Post stats
I didnt even know there was auto aim in the fame 😆 i wish you vould permanetley turn it off!
Not to be that guy but….you spelled Announcement wrong Peek 😂
It's worse in AI battles
I stopt play the game the fun is out
The game now it's just over ben
I will stop once they fix this bs game
Just don’t forget. It took more then 40 ships 2 days to sink the Bismarck.