There is no dark energy. There is only one reason to postulate it, to explain the exponential expansion rate of the universe. The expansion was discovered in 1929. In 1998 it was discovered that the expansion is accelerating, this is when the concept of dark energy became mainstream. Electricity is drawn towards potential and the universe as a whole behaves the same way. It comes into our homes because the neutral circuit provides the potential. It's drawn towards grounding rods for the same reason. If something accelerates at a constant rate it will get faster and faster. If a spaceship travels at a constant 1g acceleration rate it would achieve about 95% light speed in 1 year. Physicists in the last century did not postulate dark energy because they understood that the expansion is a fundamental property of the universe. The fact that it is accelerating does not invalidate their reasoning, it's what the known laws of physics would predict provided gravitational forces are not strong enough to counteract the process. All studies to find dark energy have been fruitless because it doesn't exist. To say there is dark energy is to say there are 5 fundamental forces, there are 4. All the great physicists from the last century did not postulate dark energy for these reasons. It's not a matter of opinion, it doesn't exist.
Literally the exact reason they're searching for dark matter is because the known laws of physics DON'T explain the accelerating expansion of the universe, not to mention the fact that galaxies do not contain enough mass to hold them together.
Most likely that’s referencing matter content or the universe, not energy content. From what I’ve seen, most estimates of energy in the universe put dark energy around 70%, dark matter around 25% and baryonic (normal) matter around 5%, with some margin of error The ‘matter content’ of the universe ignores dark energy estimates, and says dark matter outweighs baryonic matter about 4:1, so about 20% normal matter and 80% dark matter, with some margin of error as well.
The concept of a "Dark Big Bang" as the origin of dark matter is an intriguing twist to our understanding of the cosmos. It suggests that the dark sector of the universe may have had its own distinct beginning, separate from the hot Big Bang that birthed ordinary matter and radiation. If true, this theory could redefine our comprehension of the early universe and its evolution. Such an event would imply a hidden phase of cosmic history, one dominated by interactions and phenomena invisible to our current instruments yet fundamentally shaping the universe. Exploring this possibility could unravel the mystery of dark matter’s properties, its distribution across the cosmos, and its critical role in the formation of galaxies and large-scale structures. This hypothesis also raises fascinating questions: Could the "Dark Big Bang" have left imprints detectable by future observatories? And if so, might these signatures offer a bridge between the visible and dark sectors? The pursuit of these answers might not only illuminate the dark matter enigma but also expand the boundaries of modern cosmology.
Why does any postulation regarding dark matter seem to be just another admission that present-day physics cannot explain any fundamentals about the composition of gravity, just its existence and behavior?
Maybe dark matter is just a characteristic of gravity? Snake then quarks and as they clump gravity increases bidding with larger and larger particles until you have a super massive black hole holding galaxies together in the perpetual darkness of the universe.
Question what does it have to be called The Big bang ??? Should it be called the big "ka-bang" Or the "big ka-booge" Merry Christmas everybody 😂😂😂. ❤❤❤
My problem with dark matter is that it’s a misnomer in that it’s undetectable not dark. Also the entire premise that something has to be there even though we can’t detect it in any way shape or form except indirectly seems like a hypothesis at best and to then expand this hypothesis to include a dark matter version of the CMB seems even more implausible. That’s like saying string theory is entirely true and accurate even though there is also no evidence supporting it besides its proponents wishful thinking
I believe time is a singularity at one end you have the Big Bang and at the otger end only God knows. If this may be true the recoil of the Big Bang could be considered dark and undetected if it where in another dimension Please let me know if I solve string theory. Lol
Yes, it apparently does, as it is the prime candidate for why galaxies are coherent and not scattered to the stellar winds. Adding up all the stars, black holes, planets, asteroids, nebula, comets, dust clouds and errant elements does not give galaxies enough mass to hold themselves together.
Can't explain "dark matter" this video says. Well, I can't explain the behavior of women. So, it seems the Universe is a kind of unexplained, continuum. To keep my sanity, I just watch it go by.
oh so you’re the people that speak in the iykyk dialect of english and practice the art of mirage collage oh no the ultimate foe i can batman it up but art and english i don’t know my future is so woe 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
![Everything NASA Discovered with JWST's Year 2. Closest to Farthest [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wh4G1Wh79Ck/mqdefault.jpg)
![Everything NASA Discovered with JWST's Year 2. Closest to Farthest [4K]](/img/tr.png)
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
85%? dark matter? In fact, most of it is dark energy.
We know e=mc2 but is dark energy considered matter?
@@ika5666 Great Q's. Like (they) say, "Were made of 75% of water.." -maybe much more than what we're led to Believe :))
There is no dark energy. There is only one reason to postulate it, to explain the exponential expansion rate of the universe. The expansion was discovered in 1929. In 1998 it was discovered that the expansion is accelerating, this is when the concept of dark energy became mainstream.
Electricity is drawn towards potential and the universe as a whole behaves the same way. It comes into our homes because the neutral circuit provides the potential. It's drawn towards grounding rods for the same reason.
If something accelerates at a constant rate it will get faster and faster. If a spaceship travels at a constant 1g acceleration rate it would achieve about 95% light speed in 1 year.
Physicists in the last century did not postulate dark energy because they understood that the expansion is a fundamental property of the universe. The fact that it is accelerating does not invalidate their reasoning, it's what the known laws of physics would predict provided gravitational forces are not strong enough to counteract the process.
All studies to find dark energy have been fruitless because it doesn't exist. To say there is dark energy is to say there are 5 fundamental forces, there are 4. All the great physicists from the last century did not postulate dark energy for these reasons. It's not a matter of opinion, it doesn't exist.
Literally the exact reason they're searching for dark matter is because the known laws of physics DON'T explain the accelerating expansion of the universe, not to mention the fact that galaxies do not contain enough mass to hold them together.
Most likely that’s referencing matter content or the universe, not energy content. From what I’ve seen, most estimates of energy in the universe put dark energy around 70%, dark matter around 25% and baryonic (normal) matter around 5%, with some margin of error
The ‘matter content’ of the universe ignores dark energy estimates, and says dark matter outweighs baryonic matter about 4:1, so about 20% normal matter and 80% dark matter, with some margin of error as well.
Thanks team for a great video 👍💥🇬🇧
😮 Always glued
Great and very interesting vídeo. Thanks so much. ❤❤❤❤
The concept of a "Dark Big Bang" as the origin of dark matter is an intriguing twist to our understanding of the cosmos. It suggests that the dark sector of the universe may have had its own distinct beginning, separate from the hot Big Bang that birthed ordinary matter and radiation. If true, this theory could redefine our comprehension of the early universe and its evolution. Such an event would imply a hidden phase of cosmic history, one dominated by interactions and phenomena invisible to our current instruments yet fundamentally shaping the universe. Exploring this possibility could unravel the mystery of dark matter’s properties, its distribution across the cosmos, and its critical role in the formation of galaxies and large-scale structures. This hypothesis also raises fascinating questions: Could the "Dark Big Bang" have left imprints detectable by future observatories? And if so, might these signatures offer a bridge between the visible and dark sectors? The pursuit of these answers might not only illuminate the dark matter enigma but also expand the boundaries of modern cosmology.
Why does any postulation regarding dark matter seem to be just another admission that present-day physics cannot explain any fundamentals about the composition of gravity, just its existence and behavior?
D-Bang!
Very late discovery. This should have come once the BigBang concept and Dark Matter field were accepted.True..scientists should be shocked daily😀🙏
Maybe dark matter is just a characteristic of gravity? Snake then quarks and as they clump gravity increases bidding with larger and larger particles until you have a super massive black hole holding galaxies together in the perpetual darkness of the universe.
Is dark matter the blackness of the universe or is it something else entirely 🤔🤔🤔
It just weights but neither shines nor blackens.
@ika5666 so what is the blackness of space 😱😱
@@jamesblackshaw132 Space is just a shadow.
My understanding is: dark energy, 67% - dark matter 28% - “other” - 5%.
How can you say:a few months after ,when this time-measurment wasn't invented yet?!
They're getting warmer but that's still not exactly what happened. It's more likely that dark matter existed prior to the Universe we perceive
Question what does it have to be called The Big bang ???
Should it be called the big "ka-bang"
Or the "big ka-booge"
Merry Christmas everybody
😂😂😂. ❤❤❤
What if universes come in a ying/yang manner …
Wow
My problem with dark matter is that it’s a misnomer in that it’s undetectable not dark. Also the entire premise that something has to be there even though we can’t detect it in any way shape or form except indirectly seems like a hypothesis at best and to then expand this hypothesis to include a dark matter version of the CMB seems even more implausible. That’s like saying string theory is entirely true and accurate even though there is also no evidence supporting it besides its proponents wishful thinking
‘Dark” in astrophysics means undiscovered.
The dark side of the moon was illuminated just as much as the side facing us …for example.
hypothesis , wasting time
@@wnf4271,
😂😂😂😂😂 Yes the universe is made of stuff scientists made up because they can't explain something!! LAWL!!!
I believe time is a singularity at one end you have the Big Bang and at the otger end only God knows. If this may be true the recoil of the Big Bang could be considered dark and undetected if it where in another dimension Please let me know if I solve string theory. Lol
...you didn't ;}
Does this mean that there's an invisible dark universe overlapping with our own?
@OmegaWolf747 I think so and that's a beautiful way to put it
But does it mean God?
I have a personal hypothesis about dark matter. Perhaps, it’s just a shadow.
Intriguing thought, but dark matter has mass. That's to my understanding the only way we can "see" or measure it.
@ really? it has mass? That doesn’t sound right
Yes, it apparently does, as it is the prime candidate for why galaxies are coherent and not scattered to the stellar winds. Adding up all the stars, black holes, planets, asteroids, nebula, comets, dust clouds and errant elements does not give galaxies enough mass to hold themselves together.
@@TrueCicero so that’s dark matter? Nobel prize for the UA-cam scientist!
🎩👍
Epicycling never stops. Not because it is right but because it is easy.
Can't explain "dark matter" this video says. Well, I can't explain the behavior of women. So, it seems the Universe is a kind of unexplained, continuum. To keep my sanity, I just watch it go by.
Is not mi shadow a matter of Dark matter & energy?
อ้ายกาว
V'ค
oh so you’re the people that speak in the iykyk dialect of english and practice the art of mirage collage oh no the ultimate foe i can batman it up but art and english i don’t know my future is so woe 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Great new view