2. Discrete-Time (DT) Systems

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024
  • MIT 6.003 Signals and Systems, Fall 2011
    View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/6-0...
    Instructor: Dennis Freeman
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @ccosm4587
    @ccosm4587 10 років тому +262

    Starts at 8:05

    • @Roshanani89
      @Roshanani89 8 років тому

      what do you mean?

    • @random66787
      @random66787 7 років тому +11

      he means the administrative stuff regarding homework and such stops before the time mentioned and the actual content on signals and systems starts.

    • @davialbuquerque4964
      @davialbuquerque4964 6 років тому +2

      Does anyone here speak Spanish?

    • @davialbuquerque4964
      @davialbuquerque4964 6 років тому

      Hello, there

    • @funguamacho
      @funguamacho 4 роки тому

      Porque?

  • @sceKernelDestroy
    @sceKernelDestroy 6 років тому +15

    to know when your audience needs a break and have a method to engage them is an extremely valuable ability

  • @7apaza726
    @7apaza726 11 років тому +23

    the way the instructor makes the explanation is very clear, really great university, glad to have studied english to enjoy these courses that simply can't find in español.

  • @Guitare_picking
    @Guitare_picking 10 років тому +57

    I have to watch these because my teacher makes it very unclear! And theses videos are very clear !

  • @shrinidhi111
    @shrinidhi111 9 років тому +13

    One of the sweetest instructors ever!

  • @pedropinheiro3678
    @pedropinheiro3678 2 роки тому +3

    Dear Dennis Freeman, Regards from BRAZIL and thank you so much for make us thinking in different way about DT Signal Processing.

  • @ameliay5429
    @ameliay5429 7 років тому +47

    This lecture is more a philosophy course that teaches us how to think! I have gained much more instinct understanding than that of Oppenheim.

    • @edmundkemper1625
      @edmundkemper1625 3 роки тому +1

      yeah i agree!

    • @yuurishibuya4797
      @yuurishibuya4797 2 роки тому +1

      I felt the same way, this a refresher course after a long time. I am totally enjoying it.

  • @shapedsilver3689
    @shapedsilver3689 2 роки тому +4

    This reminds me a lot of a Theory of Computation class I took. Particularly similar to converting deterministic finite automata into regular expressions

  • @uniquenessexistence
    @uniquenessexistence 5 років тому +11

    Watching from the Philippines. Thank you sir Dennis Freeman. This is a great lecture (declarative). Please accept my sincere gratitude (imperative).

    • @Cash_Lovell
      @Cash_Lovell 2 роки тому

      Ta😅 a🎃 ❤🎃 A 🎉🎉 ❤q❤p😢l😂p❤😢😊😂🎃😂p😊😅😢😢😅😢😅🎉wy🎉y😊❤ aa q a t😊😂😢😊😂😊😂❤😅😢😂😊😅 A🎃i❤ Q&A 🎃🎃😊😢😊❤😅😅😢

    • @Cash_Lovell
      @Cash_Lovell 2 роки тому

      😢🎉🎉😊w🎃🎉🎃😢🎉😊🎉🎉😅😅😊😢😅😊🎉😢😊😢e🎃❤🎃🎉y🎉i🎉🎉😊o🎃🎉E🎃😊🎉😊😊🎉🎃🎉😊😢🎉😊😢🎃🎉😢🎉Q🎉🎉😊😂😢p🎃😅🎉a🎉😅🎃😅🎉😢🎉🎃😅🎃🎉🎃🎉🎃🎉🎃😢🎉😅🎃😅w🎃😢r🎃🎉🎃🎉🎃qy🎉😅🎉😢😅q😅😊q🎉😢a🎉😢🎉😊😅😊Q😊😊🎃😊😅 😊🎉p😊😢🎉😂🎉j🎉😢🎉😅😅🎉k😢😂😊t😊🎉😢t🎃🎉😅😢p😢😊😢🎉😅😢😊😢🎉😢😢🎉😊😢🎃😅😢😢😅😂🎉😢😊🎉😢😢😊😢🎉😢😊😢😅😢g😢🎉😢🎉😢🎉😅😢😅😢🎉😢😢🎉😢😢🎉😢🎉😢i😅if😢😢🎉😢😢😢o😢😢😢😅😅🎉😅😢w😊🎉😂😅p😢y😊🎉🎉😊🎉😢😊🎉🎉😂😂😢😊iq🎉😢r😢😢🎉😢🎉i😢😢it😢😢😢😊😢i🎉😢🎉😢q😢😊😢😊😢t😅😢i😢😢🎉😢🎉😢😅😢i😢o😊😢😊🎉😢🎉p😊🎃😂😢🎃🎉🎉😂q😅🎉😅😅😊🎉🎃😊😊🎃😢t🎃🎉O😂😢🎉😅😢U😢😊❤😊Q😊😢dp😢😅😊😅Q A😢🎉😊🎉😢q😅😂😊w😅🎃😢🎃oy🎃😊🎃❤wa😊😂😅😊y🎃😅🎉😊k😊🎉🎃😊🎉😅😢😊🎃h😢❤😊❤😢🎉😂😅🎉😅🎉😊😂😅😅😢🎃❤o😢😂❤😢s🎃😂w😂p😅❤😅😢s😅p😊fp😊😅😊🎃😅😅😊😢🎉😅😊🎉😅😅Af😊r😊🎉😊😊😢😊🎉😊r😊😊🎉😊pu😅l😊a🎉🎉😊😊a😅🎉🎉🎉l😅l d😅q🎉🎃😅🎉q😅😂o😅🎉😅❤🎉🎃😂🎉aa😊😢🎉y😅😊t🎉 a🎉🎃😊🎃😊 aa 😊p😊😊😢🎃🎃😊🎃u🎉🎃t😊😂🎃😢🎃🎃😅😊🎃😢😊🎃❤😅😢😊🎉😊❤q🎃🎉😅😊🎉🎃🎉😊😢😊😊ot😅😊🎉😊😅y😅😢🎉🎉😢😅p🎃😂pqoY ❤q a😂❤Qq❤😢 a❤❤🎉op❤😅a a a🎉😂😢🎉😊😅😅😊😅😂😊😢😂😅😅😢😅😢Q a g😢q😅o😂😅🎃😢qi😊😢🎃😊😢u😢aa😅😢 a😅😅😊❤😅a😊❤😅🎃❤🎉😂😅🎉😅🎉😢😂😊q😢😢😊😂🎉🎉😅😊😢😅😢🎉🎉😅😢j😢🎉😅😊🎉p w a as aqi😢🎉🎃🎉😢qp🎉😢🎃😊🎉e🎉i😢😅❤😢t😢😅😢😅😢e😢😢o😢😢😂😢😂😢a❤o😅😢😢😂😢y😂❤😊pq😅🎉😂😅😢😅o aa a😊😅QQ🎉😢😅🎉 A❤🎉

  • @sanchali.singhal
    @sanchali.singhal 11 років тому +16

    thankyou MIT open course ware. :)
    Amazing videos. It feels as if I am sitting in the class.

  • @arjumanbanu950
    @arjumanbanu950 5 місяців тому +1

    You can write on board like MIT math, physics, CS lectures. And you will see that your students are more active

    • @arjumanbanu950
      @arjumanbanu950 5 місяців тому +1

      Or it can be that you are just lazy. And you dont want yo give any effort like otger professors

    • @arjumanbanu950
      @arjumanbanu950 5 місяців тому +1

      Most of the proffesors around the world does this to give no effort

  • @nahuel3256
    @nahuel3256 3 роки тому +3

    17:00 this block diagram is so confusing...
    It would be much easier to use a negative feedback with unit gain

  • @김경환-p2z3c
    @김경환-p2z3c 3 роки тому +1

    I think what professor wanted to say was linear system can be represented by Ax=b

  • @ahmegalal
    @ahmegalal 11 років тому +4

    Excellent university = High quality education = MIT

  • @stearin1978
    @stearin1978 10 років тому +1

    11:50 (4) means [first deivative of y] = [second derivative of x] :)

  • @TheAhmedMAhmed
    @TheAhmedMAhmed 11 років тому +5

    lecture starts at 8:05
    :)

  • @NateRiver-h4p
    @NateRiver-h4p Рік тому +1

    I wish your videos had more pixels...

  • @temperedwell6295
    @temperedwell6295 8 місяців тому

    30:30 I don't understand what he says about the system at rest. The R operator is time invariant. It seems thatt that is all that is needed for the isomorphism.

  • @jeremy10ization
    @jeremy10ization 11 років тому +3

    That's strange that he says discrete-time is easier than continuous time, because my university (Alabama-Huntsville) breaks it up into two courses, with the continuous time class serving as a prerequisite for the discrete-time course.

    • @bakersaga8186
      @bakersaga8186 5 років тому

      That's strange, at UF they do the opposite, DT is a prerequisite for CT

  • @magnetsec
    @magnetsec Рік тому

    What does kachunk mean?

  • @behrouzbeheshti
    @behrouzbeheshti 5 років тому +1

    What is ‘Imperative ‘ in this context? Any help would be appreciated.

    • @musawirhussain1294
      @musawirhussain1294 5 років тому +3

      by imperative he means that all the information is present in block diagram.....
      when you make something precise it may lose some information like difference equation does.

    • @briank621
      @briank621 4 роки тому +2

      Imperative means like a command, while declarative means you are just showing something. It is imperative because the block diagrams tells you what to do with the signal, whereas the difference equation is just an equation.

  • @vorty7923
    @vorty7923 11 років тому +11

    Well i needed 10 minutes to figure out what they had to in 15 seconds :)

    • @sohamsdays
      @sohamsdays 7 років тому +1

      Thats why they are in MIT and you are not.

    • @umassfortrump1208
      @umassfortrump1208 7 років тому +9

      The Evil Tyrant wat a jerk

  • @bios546
    @bios546 6 років тому

    Somewhere around 38:39 (Accumulator) , how is y(negative integer)=0 and y(non-negative integer)=1?
    I complied with this for a while and then spotted a plot twist. It is that if I have
    y(n)=x(n)+y(n-1)
    then, y(n)=x(n) + x(n-1) + ... x(k+1) + y(k) where k is some integer smaller than n.
    Now, It is true that if n !=0 then, x(n)=0.
    So, y(0)=x(0) + y(k) where k

    • @behrouzbeheshti
      @behrouzbeheshti 5 років тому +1

      SaiKrishna KVMB I’m not sure if I get your question correctly, but if you mean ‘why y(-1)=0’, it is because the system starts at rest, so when n

    • @bios546
      @bios546 5 років тому

      @@behrouzbeheshti Thanks for taking the initiative to reply :) I appreciate replies to my questions.
      Alright, yes, you've got my question perfectly.
      That was a couple of months ago.
      Now, I'm under the impression that it's a basic characteristic of a causal system - the values of output being zero whenever the n instants are negative.
      An accumulator should accumulate the effects due to causes that cause the effects so the accumulator is a causal system, hence the zero output for -ve n instant values; Because off causality.
      Also, initial rest, that's a good way to put it...

    • @behrouzbeheshti
      @behrouzbeheshti 5 років тому

      @@bios546 No worries! I'm not sn expert in the field though :) I'm just learning.

  • @marcoma7946
    @marcoma7946 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much this is Gold

  • @3x10E8
    @3x10E8 7 років тому

    Around 28:40 he says that the operators are following rules of polynomials, then he mentions isomorphism. Are we saying that linear operators / transformations are isomorphic to polynomial operations?

    • @samiere
      @samiere 7 років тому

      No for instance x^2 in P3 is isomorphic to R3 but is not a linear operator

  • @swarnalihait7201
    @swarnalihait7201 7 років тому +2

    The professor is soo funny!!! XD I like it!! (Y)

  • @AndreRicardoSilva-sq7yx
    @AndreRicardoSilva-sq7yx 5 місяців тому

    Thanks!

  • @teepucedicamba
    @teepucedicamba 7 років тому +1

    He does have flexible fingers. :D

  • @BS-my2ky
    @BS-my2ky 3 роки тому +1

    video lectures from alan Oppenheim from 70's are better

  • @Independent_Man3
    @Independent_Man3 4 роки тому

    Honestly, could have made this at least 720 HD resolution, if not 1080 Full HD. MIT, given its massive global reputation, should have higher standards.

  • @Ashutoshvishwakarma
    @Ashutoshvishwakarma 8 років тому +7

    quality of video is not good

    • @dabulls1g
      @dabulls1g 6 років тому +9

      seriously? are you THAT spoiled???

    • @hedgehog_fox
      @hedgehog_fox 4 роки тому

      mortse 90 yes

    • @karthikbagoli2957
      @karthikbagoli2957 3 роки тому

      Although video quality is bad, but content is gold