Not really a fan. I find the description of the SI lackluster and indecisive. A) it is onmi present and almost almigthy, B) totally incompetent. The problem (for me) is that both together do not create a coherent and credible story. The Hunters from previous editions seemed more believable.
I bought both the ‘92 and ‘99 books off EBay and will read then review them. Stay tuned! Just for data gathering reasons would you be in the 20+,30+, or 40+ age ranges? Trying to determine if this might be a generational thing that is effected by having played with the older editions.
As with all TTRPGs that all depends on how you play it. I would counter that it is lighter not LARP’er. (Also VtM was one of the first games to become a LARP, way before V20 even existed so not sure how V5 is “more” LARP?) 😁
Not really a fan. I find the description of the SI lackluster and indecisive. A) it is onmi present and almost almigthy, B) totally incompetent. The problem (for me) is that both together do not create a coherent and credible story. The Hunters from previous editions seemed more believable.
🦇
NO... buy ANY SABBAT book but V5 and GET a real story WITH real stats from 2e, 3e, or V20. just that easy. pirate that shit and tell me im lying.
I bought both the ‘92 and ‘99 books off EBay and will read then review them. Stay tuned! Just for data gathering reasons would you be in the 20+,30+, or 40+ age ranges? Trying to determine if this might be a generational thing that is effected by having played with the older editions.
V20 is way better than V5. V20 is a roleplaying game. V5 is closer to a light LARP.
As with all TTRPGs that all depends on how you play it. I would counter that it is lighter not LARP’er.
(Also VtM was one of the first games to become a LARP, way before V20 even existed so not sure how V5 is “more” LARP?) 😁