Flat Earther Has a Really Bad Day!!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
- Hi all and thank you very much for joining me for another Flat Earth Friday, where today we are taking a look at Ranty Flat Earth.
He seems to have stumbled upon what he thinks is the best Flat Earth proof you'll find all year...he is of course wrong but let's find out why!
Here is Ranty's original video:
• Presentation - For Bal...
Have a great weekend and I'll see you Sunday night for a Science Top 5!
Dan's opinions shared in this video are supported by verified facts (whether scientific or general) and they should be treated as just that: opinions. All critique and humour are addressed to the words and actions of individuals and not to the individuals themselves, under the Act of Free Speech.
Admit it. His video provides rock solid proof that the Birmingham tower is in Birmingham.
Also he has somehow proved that the London tower … is indeed in London
Photoshop! Photoshop!
Yes he’s right
No. Both of those are CGI on a green screen. And whem you visit them in person, they are holograms.
OMG so it is. Fank coo Wanty 🤔🤣🤣🤣
I'm an engineer. We do solve problems. Using the findings of scientists. One of those findings is that earth is not flat.
I have a problem: How am I gonna stop some big mean mother-hubbard from tearing me a structurally superfluous new behind?
The answer? A gun. If that don't work, use more gun.
Same here
Isaiah Moore I will fix your problem. Dakka* humies always need more dakka! WAAAAGH
Practical problems or problems like "what is beauty"?
Smilewide Studios you, you stole my joke but I will make it anyway
I like flat earthers, they make me feel smart!
😆
Whahahah
You are by comparison
they had us in the first half not gonna lie
Why would you say something so controversial yet so brave
I thought flat earthers was just a running gag. Didn't know it was people who actually fell asleep in school.
Probably skipped school
Everyone knows Stanley Kubrick filmed the moon landings.
What they don't know is, being a perfectionist, he chose to film on location.
😅
Actually sounds incredibly accurate. Greatest film director there ever was for me.
Purposefully treated Shelley Duvall like absolute shit during the shining to make her give an authentic performance.
No he didnt film the moon landing cause if he did the astronauts would have been naked
Wow you can't believe moon landings in a tin can lmao.
@@typeabnegative1 i believe that can be done, living through the van Allen radiation belts is NOT possible!
its hilarious how their research consists of watching videos, misunderstanding and having zero knowledge
Well if they were intelligent and competent they wouldn't be flat earthers.
Their research is watching people who have misunderstood everything and then misunderstanding them again and copying their video but now with even less understanding
@@jt8821 And the cycle continues.
It’s actually tragic, how they babble about opening people’s minds to the “truth” when they’re crawling back into that platonic cave of deception! 🙁
@@andrewtodaro2874 You're comment made me remember this video: ua-cam.com/video/EvnxF6Hwwmg/v-deo.html
It's a facinating look into UFO culture, the people who claim to be telling the truth, and how most of UFO culture came from the Air Force gaslighting someone to cover up test flights, and going too far.
Oh wow, Mark Sargent is actually complaining that he doesn't have as many subs as Dan, this is priceless!
I think Mark Sargent is aware he has shot his bolt and is on the way out.
@@grahvis But he needs to cash those very few checks he can still get... I feel so bad for him!
While sitting in his mom’s basement... he’s a sad individual
He’s an ex-gamer “professional”, still lives with mommy and a cry baby I’m not surprised...
He lost his energy after PS rejected his advances in the flerf mocumentary, didn't he?
16:46 "they didn't know flat vs globe was gonna explode on the internet" "Nope because they likely thought better if the human race." Absolutely destroyed!
This is a dream come true for me. I am an ex Post Office Telephones/BT engineer. I spent 23 years or so at Charwelton radio station as a maintenance engineer between 1973 and 1996. THERE IS NO DIRECT LINE OF SIGHT BETWEEN THE BT TOWER IN BIRMINGHAM AND THE BT TOWER IN LONDON. The engineer in the presentation actually and correctly said the BT tower Birmingham communicated with the BT tower in London, but it did so via repeater radio stations at Charwelton, Dunstable Downs and Harrow Weald. Flat Earthers, do you your research fully!
Shh! They don't like to hear the truth Dave.
David Penny nicely done mate
Which sounds totally logical when one has even the briefest understanding of how such things work. But is awesome to hear actual confirmation from someone that was his professional career. And of course Ranty mis-reads far more into what was said then actually said (per his biased pre-conceived idea), and goes on to mis-quote. Molly NEVER stated that BT tower in London had direct line of sight communication with BT tower in Birmingham. What she specifically states was with OTHER towers, she never named which ones. Nor did Molly ever state direct line of sight with all other towers. But that is apparently how Ranty erroneously interprets it. Smh.
"Flat Earthers, do you your research fully!" - Uhm...if they did that, they would have no 'evidence' to fill their UA-cam channels with. 😂
kinda interesting that no flat earther replies to this comment... not a single little tiny one
Flat earther not a lot of views...SciManDan lot of views...conclusion: SciManDan is super boring. I love flat earther logic...
Boring='I don't understand it.'
Flatvearth thinking = "I don't understand, and can't be botheted to look in to it, therefore globe bad".
Clemens s. Don’t forget, all us folks who watch Dan’s videos are bots. Or shills. Or something.... ^_^
“Affirmative human”...
Come on, they believe in flat Earth! What sort of logical abilities would you expect?!?
7:31 He's using Wikipedia. This strange Website with the globe in the left corner. 🤔
Aahhahah
Also Wikipedia can be edited
Lol
@@Pan_cake207.. Not that globe logo tho. 😉🤣
@@AdultToons Technically yes, but you have to know html to know how to edit a page, something that is probably not going to happen...
The fact that I’ve not yet seen a comment about the name “Ballbusters” is an absolute travesty
Bustin’ Balls since ‘69
Nuka samee
BALL FONDLERS: THE MOVIE
Their trailer is a default imovie template
We all lost too many brain cells listening to him to troll the name. I'm okay the British accent, but holy hell I was straining to bot go to this idiots channel and absolutely destroy his analytics with 0:01 view times. And have negative comments and dislikes on each video telling him to change his voice because it sounds like a cluster of cats all clawing a chalkboard while mating in a massive empty room.
"They're engineers, that's all they are" he says, using a laptop, one of the most technical pieces of engineering of the modern age, and via the internet, also built by engineers.
Pete Smith which is made of components, like silica, which is discovered by REAL scientists, then afterwards is put to use by the engineers
But he is far more than an engineer, far more off his nut and living in fookin' dream world. I worry for the Human race when "people" like this can spread their cancer.
scientists discover. Engineers figure out how it's useful to us.
are they they?
It's kind of ironic that this brilliant amazing technology has given a platform to these people
... _"his content is super boring"_
Science is boring to those who have no interest in it
@@matthew3563 Don't call people the R-word. It is ugly and Disablist. Just call them wilfully stupid. I am Disabled, by the way - but not intellectually.
Well put Sir!
@@matthew3563 dun?
Because science is only real if it sparkles and shines
Isn't most of SciManDan's content just flat earther's content? It's like they're calling themselves boring.
"We have trolls"
If you need the support of trolls then you don't have an argument.
Fun thing is that all flerfers are trolls ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@gewitterhund3164 They were started by trolls at least
EVERY side of EVERY argument , sadly, has trolls. They are people with no real lives or friends who choose to fill their days fuelling fires of hot headed representatives of any topics.
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick dude fuck off
Zhan Zhang some people suspect that these people can’t actually believe in the Flat Earth. Which means they think every Flat Earther is trolling. I mean, to be a flat Earther, you need to have an extraordinarily low IQ.
I LOVE how he uses and accepts that she said line of sight between towers but ignores the other half of the statement "AROUND the world"
So that means your house is round because you "lie around the house"?
@@Dziaji How did you know I live in a yert? Joo spyin on me?
@@Dziaji explain a lunar eclipse on a flat earth
That 15 degree per hour never gets old😂... Keep it up Dan
Love it 🤣
yeah and no flat earther ever commented that they always ignore it😂
needs to be on a T-shirt, or a mug.
@@cobboGHS91 i totally support that
@@cobboGHS91 Sure thing, along with Jism's "interesting" when he proved the curvature for us lol.
This guy actually infuriated me when he said "just an engineer". We I'm "just an engineer" and I feel the need to voice my opinion on this. Engineers are technically application scientists, we use the calculations and relationships developed from scientific investigation and research to develop solutions. We aren't just some problem solving dogs body.
EE here. I sometimes refer to us as "practical Scientists". We studied science and mathematics, but we use it differently from people who are pure Scientists.
@@KeithMilner absolutely bang on. I like to explain it is to say imagine a bridge and one end theres a theoretical physicist (a scientist) who is really good at number crunching, experimentation and coming up with theories whilst on the other side you have a technician who is awesome at building things but doesn't necessarily know how to design. An engineer stand somewhere between the two, typically closer to the scientist depending on their area of expertise.
Structural engineer myself, am a consultant (yey freelance lol) but have worked in the aero and space industries so naturally am always curious as to how flat earthers explain how it is we're being conned yet can build fully operational aircraft.
@@jabbawaffle6346 Id love to see a theoretical physicist build a bridge...
@@matwatson7947 it would work well on paper...
The idiot thinks the earth is flat he won’t have a clue about engineering or what an engineer does
I love how they talk like they are scientists, yet they can't even grasp the most basic concepts in physics.
Celestial Colosseum because they haven’t actually studied anything against which they argue
They can't even grasp middle school algebra, let alone vectors.
They dont even know Gravity
I Would Say That All Flat earthers can't even grasp the most basic concepts in Frickin reality
what was it with smart people are always in doubt while dumb people know it all?
i'd say its that.
Um.... who else (with no context) would have a different idea of what the ballbusters channel would be about?
A football channel. Obviously.
Same
militant feminist channel sprung to my mind
soccer fans tried to debunk football
lmao feminists busting boy balls
so by his logic he could go up either tower with a telescope and see the direct line of sight to the other tower right? whats stopping them?
Yeah I was going to say the same thing.. 😂
They will start arguing over astmo"sphere" as visual obstruction on the line of sight. Isnt that funny
Lol exactly. Its almost sad
@@benjaminnapoli1834 A̶l̶m̶o̶s̶t̶
Pretty sure one of them would say something about perspective. I watched Nathan Roberts take photographic proof of a building that was half hidden by curvature and say that 2 more stories should have been hidden according to some curvature calculator, thus “debunking the globe”. He then claimed with a smug grin that the reason he couldn’t see all the way to the ground floor, of course, was because of “perspective”.
God I wanted to punch that smug grin off his face so hard. What a tremendous idiot.
If you're getting called out by the Flat Earth community, you're hitting the mark. Love it, Dan!
3:05 😀😀😁😁😂😂🤣🤣!!
@David Daivdson - Agreed, David. His videos have become somewhat shallow but to be honest: how long can you take these flatearth morons seriously? I guess the wear and tear from remaining sane in the face of insanity simply shows now.
Yeah.. It's funny.. Dan's a total badass, ya bitch.
This is EXACTLY what the flat earther says when Sci Man debunks them.
It isn't a valid statement.
If the earth was round then danny would not even be making these videos peroid.
I just love his logic: "The towers need a direct line of sight, there's not a direct line of sight between Birmingham and London. Then, why do they work? Could it be that there are other towers in between? NOPE! FLAT EARTH!"
You also gotta love how they make a big deal of that lady being an engineer, talking about her as a reliable source. Yet they discredit ALL the engineers who had to take earth curvature into consideration when planing shit...
They should take a visit to the world's longest racetrack. You cant see one curve from the other.
@@Gr3nadgr3gory It's because of the FoG LOL.
*I'M Definitely not kidding*
He should drive the Lake Pontchartrain causeway. Both shores disappear halfway on the bridge. Reason; Earth's curvature.
Yeah wow. There are plenty of places I have been too where it is obvious. One is Muskegon Michigan standing looking at Lake Michigan and believe me when you look at that massive lake it’s very obvious that you are seeing the horizon disappear from the curve of the earth. All you have to do is find a point ahead of you and you can clearly see that it curves downward. The same thing is brutally obvious when I have stood in several places at the Atlantic Ocean be it at the shore in Boston, New Haven, Fort Lauderdale, Ocean City MD, I have seen plenty of places up the East Coast. Oh yeah an I have also seen the same in Vancouver BC and Alaska. Just Alaska by itself shows you everything that you need to know about the shape of this globe thing. There were plenty of times when we were cruising the Pacific Ocean when you could just look forward on the ship and the horizon disappeared. The miles ahead and behind you were so vast because there was at some times no visible land anywhere close to the ship. Hey flat brainers try this sometime. It is mind blowing. All you can see sometimes is ocean. And there were times when all you could see was the top of mountains because they were so far away that because of the curvature you couldn’t see the whole mountain because it was too far away. Huh strange.
I like that the earth is more smother than a snooker ball😂
The U.S.A. should send a flat earther to space.
they did he crashed because he tried to use technolegy accunting to a flat earth
if they do it then they should leave him there
that is something that a dumb idiot donth deserve
They like sending useful stuff to space
The Flat Earther would probably take one look at Earth, not believe it still, and try to leave the space station thinking they are safe cause the Earth is clearly not real since it is a globe. 🤣
Oh boy, Ranty had 6 tabs opened. That's proof right there of the high IQ research he's been doing. No Globetard can handle more than 3 tabs opened at the same time.
My chrome has like 50 open all the time
I hope that that idiot faced fuck Redpill knows what a meme his "high IQ research" idiocy has become.
You spelled eye queue wrong.
On that note, I dont think I even have fewer than 6 tabs open that I flip between when I'm bored.
Minene Uryuu922 I PC Masterrace I Wow Hi IQ research? JK.
But, but I've got 15 tabs open at the moment and I'm a globetard... (head explodes).
I love it when a mans entire argument, his entire *world view* relies on once hearing someone talk about a thing and misunderstanding it completely, and then just relying on that one line forever and ever without actually checking up if his facts are right or if he has all the information. All it takes is just one sentence, and that one misunderstood, and this man bases his entire life around that.
It's like something I'd expect Homer Simpson to do..
Even Homer Simpson os smarter, because he said in one episode, flat earthers must be drinking beer too much! 😂😂👍
Lots of weed will do that for you!
@@loganpe427 you don't know how weed works.
Like a magamaniac.
Like the guy on that Discovery show that devoted his life to researching what he thought were invisible alien creatures called "rods" but then Discovery just used a better camera and it turned out they were just moths lol.
I've never understood how flat earthers explain gravity
Aracknorr they all come up with their own bs explanation. Or just say it’s “magic”.
I believe density is the preferred excuse. What causes density? magic clearly
One excuse I've heard a lot is that the flat earth is accelerating upward, creating the appearance of gravity.
This is the thing with most flat earthers; if you present them with an undeniable observation, they'll just state some concept that _could_ explain it, and even though they have no evidence for this claim, somehow it's enough to convince them that your point is invalid.
You might say something like: "If the earth is flat, why do we have time-zones? Shouldn't it be daytime or night time for the entire planet simultaneously?".
To which they'll respond with something like: "Because the sun actually functions like a spotlight".
Despite the fact they have no evidence for this claim, the fact that it _could_ hypothetically allow for your observation to exist on a flat earth is enough.
In other words to a flat earther, a solution that could hypothetically invalidate your argument is equivalent to hard evidence that your argument is invalid.
I've actually made the point in the past that this could be used to argue that many flat earthers (and people with similar sudoscientific belief systems) go beyond a sort of Dunning-Kruger effect, and venture in to the realm of suffering from a bonafide delusion.
After all, one of the hallmarks of a delusion is that the sufferer will come up with rationalizations to explain away inconsistencies between their belief and actual observation, but just like with flat earthers, this'll be enough to convince them that these inconsistencies don't matter or even don't exist.
The flat earth is consistently going up at 9.8 meters per second
Big magnets that would'nt work against anything that isn't ferromagnetic
It's amazing that he plays the video three times and still doesn't hear what she actually said
Fucking GOLD!
they only hear what they want to. everything else is a hoax to them or CGI
"His scientific videos are super boring"
And here is why people like to believe stupid things, because they find fantasy more interesting than reality.
That is a bloody insightful comment.
Much like children, they consider anything they don't understand as being, 'boring.' That way, it's easy to be dismissive.
Fantasy is more interesting than reality. I mean, I'd rather have a dragon than a smart car. However, you can love fantasy and still understand reality. Great comment though!
It’s on us to make it more interesting then, because reality is stranger than fiction.
(Example: The scene from interstellar where the She’s older than him at the end, can actually happen in real life)
wow flat earth its so cute and fun i guess (seriously whats the diffrence wahts fun in beliving its flat stupid flat earth fools)
.
He only has 6 tabs open. So it's _obviously_ low IQ research and can be ignored.
What do the tabs I open have to do with my IQ? If anything, they have something to do with my laziness.
@@0x777 That's an insider joke ... ;)
@@0x777 more tabs = more research = much higher iq... it's fe logic...
@@0x777 Yes, it was stated that one must have a gazillion tabs open in order to do high IQ research.
@@0x777 it's a reference to red pill religion (I think that's what the channel is called) who frequently posts videos showing his computer screen with tons of tabs open to show that he's really doing a lot of research. While doing so, he always refers to this practice as high IQ research.
Pretty sure he's a poe who found out he could make some money on UA-cam. Even for flat earthers, he's ridiculous. One video talks about how it's perfectly reasonable that the earth isn't flat or spherical but instead cube shaped. I think he's trolling flat earthers and other conspiracy nuts honestly.. But one should never underestimate the amount of stupid that someone could pack into their own brain, so who knows. Maybe he actually believes it.
Imagine poor Molly McKenzie...a serious engineer, finding out that she and her video have been used for the flat earth propaganda :O
Man, I wouldn't wanna be in her shoes. It would suck.
I'm sure if she ever runs across that video, she'll laugh at them for being ding bats.
SciManDan should try to get her on his show to prove this moron wrong.
She should copy strike that flat earth bitch
C O P Y R I G H T S T R I K E
Always perplexes me how, that when you point out such a blatant error that ranty makes, he doesn't ever respond with an, "oh yeah, I did miss that. My apologies for my error." Instead, it's just head down and full speed ahead into his deluded abyss.
I’ve just been to one of his videos, about umbra and penumbra. It’s hilariously bad, of course. The comments section is full of people critiquing the equipment, methodology and conclusions in the video. Ranty does not reply to any of them. He does reply, however, to people who write ‘this is stupid’ or suchlike. He writes ‘that was a good rebuttal of the experiment. Why don’t you address the points made or the calculations’. Yeah, he definitely won’t actually address arguments being made.
@@eddiebruv Makes you wonder what exactly goes through his mind when someone does address his observations or calculations. Does he simply stop reading their comment the moment he realizes that its something that is going to debunk his beliefs? Or, does he read the whole comment and just choose to ignore the point made? How does one not question their own belief, when so many will easily supply evidence to the contrary of it? Is it about the root belief that if they question it, it also questions the legitimaticy of their religious faith, so they must stick to it, even in the face of overwhelming evidence?
Beats me, but if there is one thing I know about humans, it's that all of them only do something, if there is a motive.
Without the ability of FE's to admit mistakes and accept finding, they should be taken as nothing more than raving madmen.
If they had any consistency to their beliefs they wouldn't be publicly publishing stuff that would get them quietly disappeared by the all powerful globe conspiracy if their beliefs were correct.
@@stanleyelliott6891 Honestly, in this day and age, I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or serious
Super boring? I get a kick out of almost every video you put up on UA-cam. Most of the flat earther channel videos are painful to sit through.
Exactly, his videos are far from boring.
@@ominous-omnipresent-they 10/10 best user name.
@@hikaru9624 Thanks! I love my name, lol.
Every flat-earth video is made by someone with an IQ of an 8 year old. I cannot stand the quality of presentation.
Puff Sassy a little insulting to 8 year olds, lol
at least he knows the intellectual capabilities of his audience, and repeats every thing six times!!!
Flat earthers listen to flat earthers because the only way for them to follow the conversation is when there isn't anything to understand.
Their real motives are simply to make money.
@Jerry C They're like computers - you have to punch information into them.
*"This is the most conclusive proof you will come across"*
Truer words were never spoken, though not for the reason he seems to think.....
Hahahaha!
I love your channel. I feel like flat earthers had gravity hit then a little too hard when their moms thought they'd float without holding them.
Flat Earther: "This is the most conclusive proof..."
Me, who has more than two functioning brain cells: "No, it really isn't."
Correction, it is the most conclusive proof.
My third brain cell can attest to this
Quantitative Diseasing
Flat earther: This is great evide-
The one brain-cell that just entered the body: No
what ever!!!
Me, a Brummie: "....nope"
To be fair, most of the hits on these other videos are from us visiting them after watching yours, when we go and comment about just how bloody stupid they are.
That's why I rely on people like SciManDan and FTFE to let me see their nonsense without me having to give them any views.
exactly lol
Benny BooBoo it’s true, the whole thing is like driving past a terrible clown-car accident; can’t stop laughing. Can’t look away. 🙀🤪
if the earth is flat then why haven't cats knocked everything off it already?
Michael T because dogs have chased them off to the abyss
LOL
WE GOTTEM BOIS
"this right here is the most conclusive evidence you'll see on this channel all year"
the cats work for the bourgeoisie
Flerfer : There is no Australia
Australian : What about me?
Flerfer : U r a paid actor from Old Zealand who work for NASA( the only agency in the world) and Satan
Australian : U got me, man
Wait, they are paying Dutchies who live in Zeeland? Gonna move there quick then
We're getting paid ?
"It's not fair! Sci Man Dan has more subs than us!"
News flash: More people prefer facts, evidence, and the truth. I'm with you, SMD!
John Smith is another but job, SMH
@John Smith
You don't have to be a scientist, or run experiments to prove that the Earth is a globe, you just have to go to sea. I did 8 years in the Navy, and watched thousands of ships appear and disappear over the horizon. I watched islands and land appear and disappear. At night I watched satellites traverse the sky in their orbits. You just have to use your eyes and common sense.
@John Smith and you dont even see the irony in your statement lol.
@John Smith
And you haven't presented any evidence at all, let alone taken every factor into account. How about the factor that every seafarer, every pilot, every engineer who builds large structures, know that they have to allow for the curvature of the Earth? You're response? "Conspiracy!" I've known so many sailors and pilots and engineers in my life, none of whom had any reason to lie to me, and they all agree that the Earth is a globe. There are simple experiments that you, yourself, can perform to prove that the earth is a globe, but you won't, will you? Or, you'll do them incorrectly, and then claim that they're fake. The massive amount of thousands of years of evidence and scholarly research and science are against you, and you have not one provable, testable, falsifiable piece of evidence in your favor. But, to accept that, you'd have to accept that you're not "One Of The Keepers Of The Secret Knowledge", that you're not special because you're "In the know" while the other 99.9% of the world are just sheep or are in on this massive conspiracy. You'd have to admit that you're wrong. You'd have to admit that you're just another chump that got sucked into one of the numerous conspiracy theories that exist because people want to feel special, they want to feel smarter than everyone else, they want to feel like they belong. I can't see the future, but I still predict that, if you live long enough, you will see that you're wrong, and you will have to deal with that. Enjoy your delusion.
@John Bennet
I've done that before, so it wouldn't have been the first time. ;)
One thing that flat earthers cant explain:
Science
This implies that they can explain other things.
Correction :
One *OF* the *MANY* things.
Everything
"They're only engineers"
Right. And meanwhile you're a fast food cashier who tries to debunk facts with no evidence whatsoever.
Don't besmirch the reputations of fast food cashiers
Money makes the world go round so flat earthers probably can't handle money.
Oooaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They probably claim some sort of disability to get a government check.
And you're only a you-tuber confined to your basement with no training or true knowledge as to scientific facts!
Dans father: are you winning son?
Dan: yes...
Sadly no, because logical arguments don't work.
Ranty defending FE, aged pretty poorly :)
I can guarantee that the line of site maximum would be 30 to 40 mile, and this would be in the 7Ghz range, one one of the large dishes. I used to install these all over the UK. Mobile phone operators still use microwave dishes to link a lot of there towers together. As part of the back haul for traffic, moving more to fibre now, due to high data demands. There is no direct link / line of sight between Birmingham and London. As part of my job was line of sight surveys, and there are a number of towers running down the country. As for the lady speaking in the video, she was just speaking generally and isn’t a radio engineer, so probably doesn’t fully understand the terminology used, when describing a microwave hop. We might have to install several hops/links to get transmission from one site to the end site.
How do we know you're not just part of the ball-earth conspiracy?
...or a lizard person
...or a Rothschild
...or something...
I'm a general idiot and even I knew the towers couldn't communicate directory to each other and likely used some method to bounce the signals back and forth while boosting them.
The nearest comparison I can think of that Joe Bloggs can mimic in their own house is Wi-Fi boosters (again I'm not clever about this but I suspect modems use a different wave form for Wi-Fi).
Well, she never really claimed that the two towers mentioned had direct line of sight, only that the backbone network was based on line of sight. Ranty is the one who connected the wrong dots, so to speak.
I was going to post something similar. This sort of LoS microwave link wouldn't work between London and Birmingham without repeaters on a flat plane either: the absorption would be too high, and alignment would be a nightmare.
By the way, I'm a Telecommications Engineer too. I used to work for C&W and Mercury Communications and was trained on Microwave LoS systems (amongst other things), and worked on the Mercury "figure of eight" National backbone, which was a combination of fibre and Microwave links.
Our qualifications and experience trump this lady's as we are concerned with the technology of radio propogation whilst she, as a Civil Engineer, is concerned with building structures. She's highly qualified, but not in the subject Ranty thinks she is.
They very carefully stopped the replay of her comments right at that point. I wouldn't mind betting that if you watched the original video she would have said something about that further on, possibly only seconds later. It's typical flaturd behaviour to selectively quote mine and this is just the same sort of thing from a video.
"Oh no! He's transforming." Made me laugh more than it should have 👌
Same
@@dxjxc91 Me too! :D
More like he’s having a stroke
Dan, please contact that engineer and interview her for a video.
honestly interviewing an engineer on whether the earth is flat or not, is taking the piss... It would be funny though, no doubt :P
That looked like some BBC thing from the 80s though.
How about we not bother a busy person, who is a an actual real applied scientist, with this nonsense?
Exactly what I thought 👍
@@jshariff786 Dan could at least ask her if she's interested in addressing the bad faith use of her words. If she's not interested or too busy, so be it.
They got that trailer off of a free app I've used it before for school 😂
I actually love that trailer. Made me chuckle.
We're an advanced, intelligent civilization, yet here we are debating over whether the Earth is flat
This is so sad Alexa play erika
we have anti-vaxxers so I mean this isn't a surprise really.
@David McDonald You are really trying.
@@Ontarianmm I think he's really exagerating. Vaccinations have saved wayyy more lives than they have ended. You are probably too young to remember alllll the crippled children who had been infected with polio. It was horrible! You are probably to young to remember when people used to die of whooping cough, or scarlet fever, or any number of deseases that people don't remember anymore, because they aren't problems anymore, thanks to vaccines.
But, some of them are on the rise again. Hmmm, I wonder why? Could it be the rise in antivaxers??? Probably!
@@edgarolmedo7166 I mean there is a lot wrong with socialism, but this dude lost me at the antivaxer bit.
Equal opportunity rather than equal outcome if you ask me.
Social welfare is a good idea on the surface, but human beings abuse it. In many cases it does free up money for drugs instead of bettering ones life.
I was on food stamps for a while and I got off them only because the people I had to be around at the DES. Yes, many are just irresponsible rather than victims. Sucks since it does help needy people who use it correctly.
There's definitely problems with capitalism too: Bezos is taking over the market for instance. You can't compete with Amazon!
I believe an amalgamation of the two economic models is where we should go.
In any case socialism is a fad among the younger generations, which I'm a part of (as in I'm a millennial). Kids don't tend to think of the implications. Indeed, how many videos are there of someone ripping on capitalism with an I-phone in one hand and Starbucks in the other? If we were truly socialist, we wouldn't have these luxuries...
flat earther: google earth is a lie distributed by NASA
also flat earther: look at these 2 points on this google earth image
Similar to:
1) NASA is nothing but liars and deceivers.
2) We can't get past the Van Allen Belts.
They believe the Van Allen Belts are there because NASA said so. But I thought NASA was liars? But they believe them SOMETIMES? When does NASA lie and when don't they? WhY is it acceptable to believe NASA sometimes but not others?
@Shawnaldo75 Yes Shawn but do the Van Allen Belts exist and NASA is telling the truth or do the Van Allen Belts Not exist because NASA is lying so we CAN get past them? You can't have it both ways. I suppose you'll just make up some new horse shit to account for this though
@@American-Plague
I may be wrong but I think you both are poking fun at flat-earthers
@@MaGaO I'm just pointing out their double standards.
I will poke fun at them !
His "proof" was legitimately difficult and frustrating to watch
If a misunderstanding is the best proof, they are really... clever
Ah yes. I fondly remember going up to the top of Telecom tower in London and being able to see the Birmingham tower in the distance. That definitely happened.
I love how the flat earthers use google maps/earth.... They are trying to prove us wrong with the help of satellites 😂😂
And GPS :))) the original idiot wrote he uses a GPS-based bike tool. I just can't hahaha
@Oiled Up And Ready ! And in that case everything would be out of proportion, bits would be missing. Countries would look bigger or smaller than they really are. Also "high altitude footage"... that sounds alot like a satellite taking a photo
@Oiled Up And Ready ! Ready to kick some babies.
@Oiled Up And Ready ! - like god for instance?
@Oiled Up And Ready ! no but you can use some rational judgement and decide what is the most likely truth. The earth isn't flat. It's just total nonsense and there isn't a shred of evidence. The reason that scientists don't believe the earth is flat, is because they understand that it isn't and the reasons that it isn't. It's not a conspiracy, they aren't just trusting what someone has told them as you believe. The reason you need to trust someone else on that is that you don't understand the science. You would be better spending your time understanding the science. However, I don't believe that you will because actually your problem is much deeper than that. You should seriously look into why that is and find the root causes.
I am a radio amateur from the Netherlands and there is a reason we have these repeater networks on the 2 meter, 70 cm and 23 cm bands, it is because of the curvature of the earth. I speak to a friend almost daily via PI6HVN, a repeater about 19 km from here. We are about 34 km apart so we cannot talk to each other directly even if we would both climb on our roofs. But by using the repeater in the middle we have a perfect and static free connection even if we are both on ground level. Given that this country is one of the flattest in the world it shows that the earth in between blocks a direct signal and is indeed a sphere.
Dan, it is not clear what you meant by 'scatter' because that is a very general term. We do use E and F layer (upper atmosphere) reflections a lot for long distances but that is on HF up to 30 MHz, the 6m (and sometimes even 2 meter) band, around 145 MHz. The E layer reflection does not happen often and is unpredictable and that is why we call them sporadic E aka Es. For frequencies of 1 GHz and upwards it is impossible to reflect against these higher layers so you do need a direct line of sight at all times. With repeaters in between if needed of course.
Nice video, keep fighting ignorance.
Ingeborg Svensson who do you work for? Your spreading propaganda lies. I want to know who pays you for this?
@@james3440 Show us your counter-facts! Do you mean that megahertzes and gigahertzes don't exist? Ther's a lot in todays society that isn't "science", just evryday engineering. What do all those tv-dishes point at? Why is something mind-numbing subscribable called "Viasat", without a cable? I can equally claim that you don't exist, as I am only replying to a piece of text.
@@jonashellsborn7648 As a sock puppet hard to know if Gum is a POE - it's the sort of thing I would post as hyperbole (but with a smiley at the end of course :)
@Xantham Gum Ingeborg is financed by the Amateur Radio Secrets Executive. Please let us know if you would like to join.
Absolutely. 30-odd years ago when I was an Amateur, a big part of thrill was those rare occasions when conditions allowed 2m signals to go far beyond the usual line of sight (plus a bit). I worked someone in Switzerland one summer from my bedroom in Leigh-on-sea (FT-290 with a home built 3-element yagi next to my bed!)
So Mark just admitted to an illegal act of organising a campaign of targeted harassment against you Dan? 🤣
Dont worry
They'll wont make it
‘Their trolls’ - they mean themselves the sad fuckers
@@ItsMrAssholeToYou Listen to his words carefully @2:10 "WE had some of our own dedicated trolls going after him" That is an admission that he is a part of a targeted campaign of harassment. So I would call that a yes!
Doug Reed Cotton wool buds might help to remove all that earwax. If that doesn't help a visit to an audiologist is recommended..
@@ItsMrAssholeToYou those movement of his you pointed out, he does those all through the video, it's part of his normal body language. "The chuckle indicates amusement at Dan being given grief, which seems a pretty normal response", that is exactly what I see and when you combine that with his words you should come to the same conclusion the rest of us come to, that he is condoning the actions. His words being self inclusive make him a part of those actions.
Every day trolls and "our own dedicated trolls" are totally different groups of people. Every day trolls are singular idiots on the internet who find it amusing to trigger a negative response from other people. They do not work together and they do not have a specific target until someone takes the bait. "dedicated trolls" are a group of people with one or more specific targets of harassment, they know who they are going after and they work together for greater effect. With the words "we" and "our" he has put himself as part of the group of people he is talking about, who partake in campaigns of harassment to specific targets including Dan which is illegal in some countries.
So strange to look back at these old videos and feel a bit of respect for a flat earther...at the time. Apparently Ranty was honest enough to look at the evidence, admit he was wrong about it and change it mind. Lots of respect for that!
No insult to the lady in the video, but she's a Civil Engineer not a Telecommunications Engineer, so her grasp on Microwave transmissions may be good, but she's not actually qualified to speak on them.
I've got qualifications in telecommunications (which include classes where you are taught about the curve of the earth and the limitations it imposes on broadcast distances) and I certainly wouldn't want to be quoted as an expert on Civil Engineering.
Right? I'm a pe and I don't pretend to know IT
Eh? But she's got degrees and stuff and Ranty thinks something she said supports his loopy notion. Qualifications are very important to flerfs at times like this but normally they are ignored when the expert in question is not saying anything that can be twisted to prop up some flerf nonsense. Space comma.
You beat me to it. Civil engineering and telecommunications engineering are two vastly different entities. She may know how to build the tower without it falling down but would no doubt struggle to explain the technology installed in said tower. Also, Ranty, ffs read up on things before making such staggering claims!
@@intux12 Yet still she got the facts right…. requires direct line of sight to radio wave's from other towers or other remote transmitter. Not at any point did she say that those towers need direct line of sight…
But then again.. what else can you expect from flat earther .. cannot read and understand what they read, cannot understand what they hear, nor will they listen when someone is telling them they are wrong. just like little kids with fingers in their ears doing lalalallalala
I work as an engineer designing and building sprinkling, water supply, heating, cooling systems and everything to do with plumbing, and I can only confirm that physics, geometry and math works exactly as we were taught in school. Flerthers see the word engineer and think this is a person who must know absolutely EVERYTHING.
I refuse to give flat earthers the attention so I never click on their videos, instead, I watch SciManDan! That way, I am giving ratings to someone who speaks sense and still get a laugh, without boosting nonsense flat earth videos.
a FLAT EARTH ENTHUSIAST, where EVERY day is a "NO BRAINER".
'The poor research skills of the average flat earther' And they're all very average.
Wow
@@Jordan-Ramses I disagree, if they were as high on the bell curve as "average", they would realize that the earth is spherical in a heliocentric solar system. You are insulting average people here!
@@warrentaylor8428 - It has nothing to do with intelligence or education unfortunately. They have been infected with dogma. Someone has convinced them that believing in the bible is the 'right' thing to do so they try to do it. It's not easy let me tell you i was raised as a Christian. They're better at self deception than i was.
I don't think that any Christians really believe it. But they think that they should so they try. You can't make them stop believing but the best way to try is to convince them that believing isn't a moral good. As long as they believe that believing is the right thing to do they''ll probably keep trying to do it.
But it isn't a big deal. There are more harmful ideologies than Christianity. Who is to say that Christianity wouldn't be replaced by something worse?
Your an indoctrinated fuckwit
I would like to see a flat earther go into a sky scraper that’s in California and use a good telescope to be able to see a skyscraper in Japan.
Chase what's even easier for them to look for is they should be to tell us they are seeing Mt. Everest cause should be most most up there way above any skyscraper, boy I would love to hear these retarded humans excuses for not being able to see it!!! Dumb Flatards
That gate video was how came across your channel. Not stopped watching since. Love your work Dan, keep it up. I'm a massive fan.
toast 1986 same here, binge watched them all after that then been subscribed since
Dan is the man
Yessah! Dan is the man for sure, I love binge watching his vids too
Ranty is proof that the human body can survive without a brain.
Zero Ninety That’s terrific!!
Zero yep, that one is shamelessly going to be stolen and going into the memory bank for future use.
😂😂
Ouch! but true in his case.
Add Oiled Up And Ready ! to that list
Ahhhh... the mind of a flat earther.
These 2 radio towers prove a flat earth.
But the sun disappearing bottom first doesn’t prove a globe earth. Wow
I wonder if they think the sun just crashes into the earth or something
@@vbgvbg1133 they think it goes so far into the horizon, that you just can't perceive the sun anymore... But if you tell them, why can't we just zoom it back in, they tell you that "you just don't understand".... Either way, as long as FE'ers don't agree with you, they're never wrong.👌 its a fantastic logic to never lose an argument.
@@vbgvbg1133 I've made that argument in a group, and they told me mountains cover the sun, that's why we don't see it at night😂😂😂(I'm actually serious)
Evan Jones, even if the sun would vanish do to distance and perspective, the sky would still be lit and never get dark, because it is never in the shadow of something like the globe.
@@WalterBislin Exactly what I said, then they banned me😂😂
Ball-busters... dude I woke my wife up I was laughing so hard
Is flat-earth a global trend?
The flat-Earth movement is growing... they have conferences all around the globe!
Yes, it's a "global" trend :))))
For them it would be a snow globe trend. Essentially that is what they believe the earth is with the dome and all. Except for them the waters are on the opposite side.
Yes but it's had its bubble of interest and is now trending downwards trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=flat%20earth
@@DeathBYDesign666 ..and the world supported on the backs of four elephants, themselves resting on the back of a turtle.. Seems legit!
(Ranty, our favorite closet glober, not only is wrong on the workings of the towers, -he also got his numbers wrong. He says that on a flat earth, there would be a direct line of sight. But if you calculate it properly (but we all know, that isn't the strong forte of flerfers) you would see that it hasn't a direct line of sight. The height of the Birmingham tower is given as 151 meters, but that's to the top of the crane on top of it. The height to the highest disc is at a height of aprox. 141 meter. The London tower has a height of 191 meters, with the discs much lower at aprox. 171 (and then I'm being generous). The line of sight therefore crosses the point where the highest elevation can be found (at 63.7 km from Birmingham) with a height of 167 meters at a height of 153 meters. Even if we just take the entire heights of both towers, we come at a crossing height of 167 meters, and that's exactly the height of the hill blocking the direct line of sight. A disc just touching the maximum heigths of both towers, doesn't have a direct line of sight on a flat earth).
This is what you get when you team up a house-painter, with a sacked Tesco delivery boy and a taxi-driver without a license and try to deliver scientific evidence.
*edit* I should retract this whole comment, because it was pointed out to me that I forgot to include the height of Birmingham above sea level (140 m) and the height of London (11 m) above sea level. As a matter of fact, there is a line of sight on a flat earth model (which obviously and observably is the wrong model).
However, I won't delete it, it's wrong and I admit that it is wrong.
Great comment fellow Globe head!🤣
That is how it works. Back when I installed Microwave links we started with topographical maps to plot our elevations along the path, determined our tower heights needed on each side (based on the elevation of the two locations) of the path, plus added an estimated 10-year tree growth. Thank goodness for fiber optics.
But Frank do not forget, they each have a BSc.............."bronze swimming certificate"
@@steverushforth7009 LOL and medals for Three Year Long Service, Six Years Long Service, Nine Years Long Service...
The values that you are giving are the height above the ground, not the height above sea level. You need to add about 40 meters to the London tower and about 130 meters to the Birmingham tower.
look at the comment at 6:41. GPS app used to “prove” the flat earth. hmmm i wonder how a GPS system would work on a flat earth if it requires satellites to use GPS. hmmmmm
If the earth was flat you would only need 3 satellites for GPS. Heck, they could even be terrestrial transmitters, sort of like LORAN.
Unfortunately, the G stands for "global" and an entire constellation of satellites are required for coverage.
They'll use flat satellites 😂
And GPS stands for *Global* positioning system 😂 😂
Swapnil Shinde flatellites
If I recall from another video they think satellites aren't in space there just really high in the sky on balloons
Kudos to SciManDan for having the ability to sit through these tedious flerf videos in order to extract true hilarity for the rest of us! ...and they called YOU boring lol
Recipe for a flat Earth definitive video:
1. Take some misquotes.
2. Sort them to support your point.
3. Add the ignorance BBQ sauce of your choice.
4. Cook it and serve it.
Cook? People with that level of intelligence should not be handling fire.
the earth is flat people all the scientific data demonstrate this.
@@TheCommun3 Which scientific data? Cite just one confirmed, observable and repeatable scientific fact that supports a flat earth.
Every time I see it I'm incredulous: flerf uses Google Earth to "prove" the earth is flat.
The cognitive dissonance is strong with them.
it's probably because google earth is represented in two dimensions on a screen, any higher dimension than two is just too much to comprehend for them.
sci_fi would melt their simple minds
"this will be the best flat earth proof you will see on this channel"
hmmm, that doesn't bode well for the other flat earth proofs then.
Says a lot about his channel 🤣
I stumbled across your channel just the other day and I have to say, it's made the Covid Shutdown here in 2021 bearable. Your way of doing these videos always has me chuckling. I cannot wrap my brain around flat earth. You are appreciated by me.
Same dude
Hey dan, vsauce once made a video about: how tall can we build? In that video he said that if you're in the tallest building in the world (Burj Khalifa) the sun will set 3 minutes later than on the ground. It's another great example why the earth is round
Flattards will probably try to pin it on atmospheric refraction and heat.
@@D2onAir yeah probably 😂
I’m sure ConspiracyCatz referenced this in one of his videos.
One can even observe that, being in a mountain area with high mountains, like the Swiss Alps or so.
Darth Kermit
Yes. You can take the lift on any tall building near the sea and try to chase the sunset.
SciManDan’s videos:
80% flat earther video
20% instant debunking commentary
Flat Earther:
“ScimanDan’s videos are soooo BORING”
if it says SciManDan's videos is boring,you are boring too.
Contact Molly and ask her to elaborate. Would be so amazing to hear rantys key witness destroy him.
My thought exactly! Dan, you have to do this!
OMG, I'd be so on board for this. Unfortunately, I would assume she's rather busy.
@Per Gammerath. That is by far the best idea I've heard in quite a while! That would be just perfect.
Seriously, I wouldn't bother.
She's highly qualified and experienced, but NOT in microwave Engineering. She's a Civil Engineer. Her expertise is in building bridges and buildings that don't fall down (as a gross generalisation). She probably only knows as much about microwave Engineering as she's been told for this camera piece.
Having said that, she almost certainly does know that there is a repeater network which the tower has LoS with, and she definitely knows the earth is a globe (because she's smart and educated).
But she is, in this context, just a presenter. She's not an authority on microwave Engineering and she's not really even an authority on this specific building: she probably wasn't even born when it was built.
@@KeithMilner Good point, Keith. I fear anybody else's (despite their qualifications) explanation would be easily dismissed as a liar and con artist by ol ranty.
“Oh No! He’s transforming!” Had me dying hahaha
"The ballbusters have special guests..."
They're special alright.
Yeah, special needs children..but in a far more acute, irreversible state. There's no helping them!
@@andrewlockett4569 true. The only real thing we can do is to laugh our asses off at the stupid ideas they come up with.
Yeah they're special...special ed.🙃
Mircea Dogaru that made my day
lmao
I died when he said “ Oh no he’s transforming” 5:08 hahahahaha
My morning started off pretty grim, then I watched your video, which cheered me right up 😂
Watching Flatards being flattened certainly puts a smile on my face😂
You are my opposite wherever you are in the world as I am about to fall asleep. Internet = crazy.
@Tulumoni Borgohain I'm loitering in the comments waiting for the first Flatard Trolls to rear their dumbass heads poised and ready for action 😁
@@Jpp-iy4km I'm in the UK. What part of the globe do you reside?
She said 'Line of sight to radio waves.' not line of sight from tower to tower🤣
So every civil engineer knows the earth is flat but they have managed to keep it secret!
Not much if a secret then is it?
Not just civil engineers, but also pilots, land surveyors and etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
If it was only civil engineers, If I go through some videos and combine all the people that have to know and hide it according to flatards it will surpass 100 million :D
Hmm
As a civil engineer, I feel like I was excluded from this :(
@@ZackWolfMusic And they are all part of a NASA conspiracy? Just grow up and get an education.
"I can't prove the earth is flat but you're wrong anyways" Part 133769
🤣🤣🤣 awesome
Part 69420
Season 1337
Thats a show that should've been canceled after ep. 1.
But the producers keep running it. And the fanbase laughs at them.
@@khai2585 That's because the producers keep telling the broadcasters their numbers are wrong, and there *really are* more viewers out there, if only they wouldn't rob us like that
You can prove the earth is flat when every wear you go it is flat when you are in a plane you see the ground is flat for miles upon miles.
Can you imagine sitting in your bedroom and hearing your dad shouting "butt hurt alert"! 😂
Honestly though Scimandan is a boss
Is this guy a dad???? He seems so young!!!!
I appreciate you making these videos. I can get a laugh without appearing to support these crazies.
Lol yeah
But Molly doesn't say direct line of sight to the London tower..... she says direct line of sight of radiowaves to London
Back then she didn't think she needed to clarify that there were intermediate towers between Birmingham and London.
"she says direct line of sight of radiowaves to London"
Flerfs next week: "Look this stupid globehead thinks radiowaves have eyes!"
Why not interview Molly again and ask this simple question.....Does this tower have a direct line of sight to London tower or is repeater towers needed ? and why. Duh.
@tie pup Does the inverse square law come into that too? I only know the barest basics about that. It's, what... when you double the distance of a transmission, you square the amount of power needed? Something like that? So having a single tower eating several power plants' worth of power to emit one unreliable signal over a too-huge distance is a bad idea, especially since smaller transmitters at the edges could easily overpower the weakened signal, which is how people hijack channels for pirate broadcasts?
Either way, it's clear Molly was referring to the network of towers with each part being close enough to signal its neighbors but not the entire thing. It's like flerfs have never seen a hair net before.
Absolute, undeniable, best proof that ... flat-earthers are grasping at straws. Their arguments are so easy to debunk that is like stealing a candy from a 3 year-old. It’s pathetic.
@Jospeh H Idiot.
The irony of Mark Sargent saying SciManDan is boring. I honestly can't sit through a flat Earth video because they are so boring. They speak so slowly and have no editing and repeat themselves 50 times. Dan here has some nice editing, speaks at a god pace and doesn't repeat every point 50 times. Maybe it's too fast for Mark Sergeant? He can't keep up with the big words.
The Flat Earthers are as bad at creating content as they are at everything else in life. They are just shitty humans. Stupid losers.
Heh. Speaks at a God pace. 😂
The only way I can get through a Mark Sargent video is to have SciManDan break it into digestible chunks separated by what I call sanity breaks.
I had the sound off and all of a sudden I was watching an interview with Rupert Grint promoting the Birmingham Tower.
It would be interesting to see how he would react if Molly herself told him he was wrong, after saying she was an expert and using her as his proof.
Wonder if Molly knows how he has misused her statements and credentials?
He's open to a page that clearly says construction began in 1963 and was completed in 1965... and he's making guesses as to when it was built... but that information is literally in front of his face...
This guy wants you to take him seriously? He cannot even read the first sentence under History.
"Construction of the tower commenced in July 1963 and was completed in September 1965"
It literally took me all of 15 seconds to google/open wiki/copy & paste here...
"A stable platform is necessary so that the microwave dishes mounted on the side of the structure keep line of sight with the remote transmitter they are communicating with."
Same web page under the same heading... this guy...
yeah let's not forget that CIVIL ENGINEERING has nothing to do with ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS (RF Applications and Telecommunications ) Engineering
how did he miss that ?
you don't ask your mechanic who is a mechanical engineer to build you a tower
and you don't ask your civil engineer to fix your car
and you don't ask a civil engineer how to transmit radio signals
ME~ "Siri, translate Flat earth to English."
SIRI ~"things i dont understand do other things i dont understand causing effects i dont understand, therefore flat earth"
Lmaooooooo
Ooooh, an illogic chain! Nice.
You are absolutely right. It's the logical fallacy known as Appeal to Personal Incredulity.
"...because...Reasons"
Did it actually said that😂😂😂
I'm an Aircraft Maintainer (engineer) and would never describe any Engineer as "JUST an Engineer"!!! I love how Dan doesn't really have to do anything but watch these loonies' videos and let them dis-prove their own findings!!! Betting none of them are sailors either due to the Nautical mile being different to the standard mile!?
On a bus to a flat earth conference, someone stepped in and yelled "On the left, there are just con artists. And on the right, there's the idiots they fool!"
One on the left got up and yelled back "Hey, I ain't no con artist, I'm legit!"
The man pointed to the right "Then you're sitting on the wrong side!"
Hahahaha - great! :D
Do you know what you call a bus load of Flerfers going over a cliff?
A good start!
@@_Abjuranax_ What said the Flat Earther with a job to the Flat Earther without one?
Do you want fries with that?
@@_Abjuranax_ I was over at a Flat Earther channel and offered to tell a joke.
"Hey", said one of the people there, "we ARE flat earthers all around here, ya know that?"
"Ok", I said, "I'll use very simple words to tell it".
Conclusive proof that we need relay stations to get round the curve, good job 👍
i know right... what a complete fuckwit
what did he think...
that the network consists of 1 Transmitter and 1 Receiver hehe
what a fuckwit
my favourite was...... he references a CIVIL ENGINEER to win a debate on RF Applications LOL
Literal century's of mathematics and observational evidence.
Flat earther - You're all nothing but sheeple!
Engineer says *direct line of sight*
Flat earther - 👁️👄👁️ The Messiah is here
Just don't forget to take out the little nuance she put in, namely it was "a direct line of sight of radio waves". You can't trust an expert without cherry picking their words.
When it comes to stupidity Flerfers are giving SovCits a run for their money.
Mark: "His videos are boring, why does he have more subs than me!?"
Also Mark: "Welcome to Answering the same questions over and over again for the 144th time"
Yeah clearly butt hurt.... this video alone has again over 140k views....
Mark is quick with the answers. When asked about sending civilians to the ISS, he pretty much answers, "Nope" and then goes on. I can't imagine why people would get bored with that.
Poor attention seeking Mark is so butt hurt that Dan can get so much more attention more easily then he can. Smh.
@@kevinfisher1345 - Mark has run out of things to talk about so, he has to start attacking others and using more conspiracy theories.
If only Ranty understood what civil engineers do....
Aye. nothing to do with Radio Frequency engineering :)
They get paid twice - once for cut and once for fill...
If only Ranty understood what beings with higher brain function and oppose-able thumbs do...
Should we tell him those NASA people have a lot of masters degrees too? And many worked in relevant fields before working for NASA?
It seems he finds credentials important when believing someone's story.......
I smell confirmation bias!
If he thinks they have LOS, why doesn’t he climb the tower to film what it can see? If it could see London, which it can’t, then that would be his proof.