They should have parodied The Overlap. Ben coming in from the right singing about Jammy Dodgers, Watto complaining he doesn't like the monkey emoji. Jamie bringing in Earl Gray.
I think it would have worked if Mark walked in during it. It was to make a joke about how bad his weekend was in comparison to theirs, but just fell flat without the person who is the punch line
What it seemed like to me is, they always start filming a bit before and normally they'd have a pause, introduce the guest and then get into it. But they accidentally kind of started talking about it just casually without giving it a pumped up intro without any other guest and so just had to leave that footage in? Just the way they said "okay ready to roll, guess we better start with United then" with little energy, even if you were trying to be the Overlap you'd do that part with a more obvious intro.
They just watch Match of the Day highlights to get their talking points because they didn't actually watch the match. This show is so cringe this season.
@@DeathByDeadite They alluded to listening to the game on the radio, which gives no indication on the type of fouls have been committed. In terms of the 2nd bookable offence, the first one was pitiful and LCFC also suffered the same fate with one of their own players getting booked for something that wasn't bad. I think the ref applied some common sense 2nd time round and wanted to give us a game.
@@stevescourou8006 Skipp's first tackle on Martinelli should have been a straight red all day. This is the problem with creating a weekend review/analysis show without actually watching 80% of the matches.
What in the gaslight is going on with all these channels? Just watch the game guys. Vardy for the first goal from the set play was a dive. Ndidi should have been sent off, skipp should have been sent off 3 times and calafiori first booking wasn’t even a foul. Fair play to Leicester for showing such spirit and fight but the reality is it should have been 6/7-0
Are you serious? It wasn’t a dive for the first goal, Ndidi shouldn’t have been sent off and Skipp should’ve had second yellow card. The bias for Arsenal in this comment is mental. Califiori should’ve had a second yellow card aswell.
@@chesterlester5770 go back and watch it not just MOTD. vardy got in front and dragged his leg, no contact initiated by saliba. Skip made a red card tackle on Martinelli (not booked) then 3 cynical fouls and only getting booked for the second. The Ndidi delay of the restart was exactly the same as trossard vs city. The excuse of saka being on the floor by the ref or no plauer there to take it holds no merit as it was identical in the city game. Therefore it is a second yellow if the refs are consistent (regardless if fans want that decision or not) As I said the first yellow for Cala he literally ran past the player and was just stronger, no foul. He couldn’t send him off for the dive for the second foul as he hadn’t sent skip off (finally some consistency)
@@chesterlester5770 Skipp should've been sent off before Califiori made that challenge so talking about the Califiori challenge without the Skipp ones is bad faith. The referee ultimately did a good job in balancing the game to make it fair, which is the whole point of common sense refereeing guidance.
@@lukewoods9745 I watched the whole match mate. I think Skipp should’ve been sent off for second yellow (the first ‘red card offence’ he gets the ball, his foot just rolls over the ball). I agree the first califiori yellow isn’t a yellow but it was given so the second should stand. Vardy didn’t dive, he was dragged back by Saliba. If that was the other way around, you’d be screaming for it. Don’t wanna hear it, you’ve literally just backed your own team in every decision.
I love how everyone talking about saliba and califiori and skip the fact that Skipp should have been booked at least 4 times this game and got only one yellow card. In the first minute of the game he stepped on Martinelli's foot and got away with it
Benzema: “Football has become a game where players can play bad for 90 minutes and then score a goal and be called Man of the Match and get the spotlight. I don’t want to be that kind of a player.” “We no longer bother to look at what a guy does on the pitch, just who has scored. And the next day, we consider him the best. It’s happened to me: If I don’t play a good game but I score, then they see me as the best. I don’t really like this type of football, but it will be more and more like that.” “When I play, I try to respect football. For example, I can’t shoot if I don’t have an angle when there is an unmarked teammate. I’m going to pass the ball to him. I don’t think, Ah, but possibly I’m going to score.”
the football world had messi vs cr7 for over a decade. it was boring and devalued the prestige of the ballon d'or now its haaland vs mbappe. even more boring. football is dead.
I think Mark mentioned that it took so much time to drive down now when he also has a podcast of his own. I can see that when I look at his timeschedule throughout the week. It's insane imo. I miss him though, really miss him.
If you are prime Ronaldinho, you have world class abilities, but you don’t have good stats, what do you think is the reason? There are a few possibilities, maybe you always dribbled past 7-8 players, pass it to player B, and he pass it to player C and score. So you never get any G/A, but your team win 5-0 every game because of you. Does it make you not a world class player? No. People who actually watch football will acknowledge that you are a world class player, despite that you are not getting good stats. Do you think player B and C are world class because they have got amazing stats? No. They are so easy to be replaced in your team. Anyone can do their job. A lot of kids today who know nothing about football. They judge players based on surface level stats without watching football matches. Having good/poor stats doesn’t mean you have/don’t have world class abilities.
Ronaldinho isn't a football player, he's a feeling. I live in Australia and he's the only player I've ever gotten up early to watch play in the champions league (my team never makes the champion's league, otherwise that might be different).
Absolutely shocking take on the Arsenal Leicester game. Vardy did nothing and was not a handful. Talking about Calafiori but not Skipp and Ndidi who should’ve been off objectively is abysmal analysis of the game. Also, degrading the value of Arsenals set piece coaching to “somebody has to do something to” for the opposition is unbelievable. Do you really think that opposition teams and coaches don’t work on that when we’ve been scoring so many corners for the past 2 years?
Palmer is more important to Chelsea than Haaland is to Man City yes. but if Palmer were back on City rn, he wouldn't be as important to them as he has been to Chelsea, and I say he wouldn't be as important to City as Haaland is to City. after all,, he was doing great at City whenever he got minutes, its not like he moved to Chelsea and then got a ton better overnight,, he just was another great player amongst incredible ones. he got pushed out for a reason, they didn't need him
I don’t see how Rodri has a point about the 60/70 goals a season, he got injured like 5 games in a season which proves it doesn’t matter how many games you play…you can get injured any time
Correct. He only played 57 games last season. With a then 2-3 week break before the new season. No point at all. (I'm gonna say here that I'm being sarcastic. Just in case you don't have that perception available to you.)
@@OfficialCarebox well get a different job then, all you hear when players transfers happen is they all want to play in European competitions and now that they do they complain, change the wage so they get paid as they play and watch how many come out to say they want to play every game
The ref doesn't get a replay. First viewing it looked nasty. But the VAR guys can't justify a review bcus a high challenge was made while out of control (mid-slip). Unfortunate, there's no outrage to be had. On a side-note...I think Rashford can't do anything. He stuck the burners on but being dispossessed meant he had to just run it off. It's not his fault the 10 men behind him failed to make a challenge
If VAR does nothing “I can’t believe they didn’t overturn it” If VAR overturn it “why do they re-referee the game?” I don’t think it was a red and it’s harsh, but as they said multiple times it was high and you can see why the ref gave it initially…to me that’s then not clear and obvious.
There are modern CB that good on ball like Van Dijk, and Laporte, Thiago Silva, and there are even more modern CB, they are lightning quick, and they even get into opponent box helping the attack, like Van De Ven, Gvardiol and Calafiori, football keep evolving more and more.
The season before Haaland joined Man City, they created 88.7 xG, scored 99 goals (scored 11 more goals than their xG). KDB was their top scorer, he scored 15 goals. The season Haaland joined Man City, they created 78.6 xG, scored 94 goals (scored 22 more goals than their xG). Haaland was their top scorer, he scored 36 goals. Haaland’s stats seem to look good, but he massively reduces his team’s xG. And he tries to use his great finishing to make up for it. Man City become more clinical, outperforming their xG by a larger amount, but they actually scored less in total with Haaland. It’s like when you think there is a big discount in the supermarket, but in reality, the price is marked up by a lot before the discount is made, so you are actually paying more. You think a 90% off discount is good, but it’s really not. Before he joins, if you look at their top scorer (15 goals), you might think that they are not clinical. If they had a clinical striker (over 30 goals), they will score a lot more. After he joins, they did become more clinical, but they score less in total.
This is becoming my favourite podcast. Mainly because you speak about every team not just the bigger clubs. My teams game (Ipswich) will get a good mention so I try and tune in. Good stuff lads.
Would you prefer a 50 goals per season striker, but because he always loses possession, and because of him, his team can’t create chances, they can only score 70 goals in total for a season? Or would you prefer a 10 goals a season false 9, but because of his dribbling skills, tiki taka passes and other amazing attributes, his team can create so many chances, capable to score 120 goals in total per season? What matters is to maximise the TOTAL number of goals your TEAM can score, not how many your striker can score.
There is no straight leg by Bruno, its a bent knee with ankle making side contact with Maddison in a clear yellow foul, never a RED if VAR does its job
Loke to see hwo they are tryng new ways to perform podcast Personally Bens intro Music intro Quick mate catch up Then into the games Bens energy at beginning of podcast is ⚡⚡⚡
The good thing about Maresca is he has set up differently against almost every team, depending on the oppositions tactics. Some games he has focused on possession and slow build up, some he's focused on counter attacking and allowed the opposition to control the ball and then hit them once they incepted the ball. Makes it very hard for coaches to know how to prepare for him.
Only casual fans would care about stats. Look at Palmer’s silky/tekky touches/close control on the ball. The tricks/skill moves he does. The short combination tiki taka passes. The through passes. The possession loving mindset. The Spanish game reading and tactical understanding. He is brilliant regardless of stats.
if Palmer didn't have that game it could have still have been 6-0. Brighton had 1xG, and thats cos Sanchez gave them a tap in, if not for his two Bozo moments, they created nothing. There was also 3 marginally offside goals, hit the post twice, and about another 3-4 narrow misses from Chelsea.
The defenders are getting a lot of flack for VDVs run and rightly so but to me the DM, Urgarte also takes a lot of blame. By the time he thinks "I should come over to that side" VDV is at the edge of the box.
a lot of these runs start when man utd midfield loses the ball or turns it over. common culprits are casemiro, rashford, erikksen and bruno. all the teams know how to play against man utd. just run against their midfield, make sure to keep away from martinez and ugate and you can make it to their edge of the box in a few seconds. square it to the far post because there usually is nobody there. ez tap in. been going on for 2 seasons.
I disagree with your comment on West Ham. We wanted different from Moyes, not one hammers fan wanted Lopetegui in so it's unfair to say that we just aren't happy with any style.
10:08 VAR is for clear and obvious errors. The decision the ref gave was not a clear and obvious error. Hence, the VAR did not tell the ref to take a look at the monitor. The VAR is not there to correct every decision the ref makes. Otherwise, the game will go for 4 hours. It's disappointing to watch a football show where the host doesn't know the basics of the rules and chats absolute nonsense.
@thecyclinggk Not really. The commentators agreed with the decision. The pundits at half time were split. Social media appears to be split as well. When you're seeing half of everyone saying it was a red, and the other half saying it was a yellow, then it is not clear and obvious. Personally, I think the clear and obvious ruling is shit. But until it is changed, these are the things we have to keep dealing with.
@wilko3017 I hope they can do something with schedule cuz the og Dave Foster m mark is unbeatable love listening about football from these lads . Just maybe reschedule it to a diff day .
Watto is mad at Arsenal scoring set-pieces. It's not easy to man mark those giants. Arsenal has like 5 , 6'1 players..Saliba , Califiori, Kai , Rice , Gabriel.. And they're on verge of adding 2 others ,Merino & Tomiyasu. Imagine on a corner, in swinger by Saka then 7 , 6'1 players in the box.. madness!! Maybe Zonal marking can work.
Porto are the only team I've seen defend our set pieces well in the last couple of seasons. And even then I think a large part of that is due to Costa being very good, similar to raya, at cross claiming.
Why’s Ben got the dogs out at the start 😂
Sorrrry 😂
@@thecyclinggk and shoes with no socks... bet those are stinkers!
@@madlowles Nobody will be buying his trainers anymore now!
@@thecyclinggk Absolute shock of a life time.
The first few minutes sounds like hangover talk, what's happening? Was it meant to be filmed? 😢
They are just trying to be like The Overlap.
Bet we soon are gonna have to see them eat and drink all the time as on The Overlap too 🤮
They should have parodied The Overlap. Ben coming in from the right singing about Jammy Dodgers, Watto complaining he doesn't like the monkey emoji. Jamie bringing in Earl Gray.
Trying to over act being normal makes it not normal
Cold open didn't work lads. Sorry. After the lively opening credits, best to get on with it. Would be great if you parodied the overlap, mind.
Really agree, the start seemed so flat then didn't it? Felt a bit awkward.
think they are trying to do what the overlap do on sky
It would’ve been better if it was a proper cold open (I.e before the intro music). It was a bit jarring
I think it would have worked if Mark walked in during it. It was to make a joke about how bad his weekend was in comparison to theirs, but just fell flat without the person who is the punch line
What it seemed like to me is, they always start filming a bit before and normally they'd have a pause, introduce the guest and then get into it. But they accidentally kind of started talking about it just casually without giving it a pumped up intro without any other guest and so just had to leave that footage in? Just the way they said "okay ready to roll, guess we better start with United then" with little energy, even if you were trying to be the Overlap you'd do that part with a more obvious intro.
Mentioning Calafiori's questionable second yellow but not Skipps 3-4 horror tackles?
They just watch Match of the Day highlights to get their talking points because they didn't actually watch the match. This show is so cringe this season.
@@DeathByDeadite They alluded to listening to the game on the radio, which gives no indication on the type of fouls have been committed. In terms of the 2nd bookable offence, the first one was pitiful and LCFC also suffered the same fate with one of their own players getting booked for something that wasn't bad. I think the ref applied some common sense 2nd time round and wanted to give us a game.
@@stevescourou8006 Skipp's first tackle on Martinelli should have been a straight red all day. This is the problem with creating a weekend review/analysis show without actually watching 80% of the matches.
Are you surprised?
3-4??? 🤣 you mean the one where he stood on his toe and arguably should’ve had a second yellow card. Don’t blow things out the water
Vardy did nothing 😂😂😂
What in the gaslight is going on with all these channels?
Just watch the game guys. Vardy for the first goal from the set play was a dive.
Ndidi should have been sent off, skipp should have been sent off 3 times and calafiori first booking wasn’t even a foul.
Fair play to Leicester for showing such spirit and fight but the reality is it should have been 6/7-0
Are you serious? It wasn’t a dive for the first goal, Ndidi shouldn’t have been sent off and Skipp should’ve had second yellow card. The bias for Arsenal in this comment is mental. Califiori should’ve had a second yellow card aswell.
Skipp should also have been sent off. They are lucky coz it should have been 7 - 0 Congratulations to the Leicester keeper he was great.
@@chesterlester5770 go back and watch it not just MOTD. vardy got in front and dragged his leg, no contact initiated by saliba.
Skip made a red card tackle on Martinelli (not booked) then 3 cynical fouls and only getting booked for the second.
The Ndidi delay of the restart was exactly the same as trossard vs city. The excuse of saka being on the floor by the ref or no plauer there to take it holds no merit as it was identical in the city game. Therefore it is a second yellow if the refs are consistent (regardless if fans want that decision or not)
As I said the first yellow for Cala he literally ran past the player and was just stronger, no foul. He couldn’t send him off for the dive for the second foul as he hadn’t sent skip off (finally some consistency)
@@chesterlester5770 Skipp should've been sent off before Califiori made that challenge so talking about the Califiori challenge without the Skipp ones is bad faith.
The referee ultimately did a good job in balancing the game to make it fair, which is the whole point of common sense refereeing guidance.
@@lukewoods9745 I watched the whole match mate. I think Skipp should’ve been sent off for second yellow (the first ‘red card offence’ he gets the ball, his foot just rolls over the ball). I agree the first califiori yellow isn’t a yellow but it was given so the second should stand. Vardy didn’t dive, he was dragged back by Saliba. If that was the other way around, you’d be screaming for it. Don’t wanna hear it, you’ve literally just backed your own team in every decision.
Saw a few refs swallowing the whistle this week to keep 11v11. Too bad Kavanaugh and Oliver haven’t gotten the message.
i liked the cold open!! :)) maybe just up Ben's volume a bit for it :)
I love how everyone talking about saliba and califiori and skip the fact that Skipp should have been booked at least 4 times this game and got only one yellow card.
In the first minute of the game he stepped on Martinelli's foot and got away with it
Ndidi, Skipp and Calafiori should have all been sent off.
How can u talk about a football match without watching it
Let me guess.. you support one of the teams we weren’t bigging up ?
@@thecyclinggkit's legit question
@@thecyclinggk ooh touchy
@@thecyclinggkI usually like the content here, but this is a pathetic reply.
@@thecyclinggkhaha
Benzema: “Football has become a game where players can play bad for 90 minutes and then score a goal and be called Man of the Match and get the spotlight. I don’t want to be that kind of a player.”
“We no longer bother to look at what a guy does on the pitch, just who has scored. And the next day, we consider him the best. It’s happened to me: If I don’t play a good game but I score, then they see me as the best. I don’t really like this type of football, but it will be more and more like that.”
“When I play, I try to respect football. For example, I can’t shoot if I don’t have an angle when there is an unmarked teammate. I’m going to pass the ball to him. I don’t think, Ah, but possibly I’m going to score.”
the football world had messi vs cr7 for over a decade. it was boring and devalued the prestige of the ballon d'or
now its haaland vs mbappe.
even more boring.
football is dead.
@@optiondezzo1513
Mbappe is not boring. The premadrid Cristiano Ronaldo was not boring.
Exactly, Benzema's best season was when he scored 15 goals and also got 15 assists.
Google Benzema 15 to see more about this.
Google Benzema 15 for more info
Lads, bring Mark back please. We've been patient.
I think Mark mentioned that it took so much time to drive down now when he also has a podcast of his own. I can see that when I look at his timeschedule throughout the week. It's insane imo. I miss him though, really miss him.
Rather he doesn't appear with his bias views on United
@@Jam-iv6xz have you listened and understood what he says?
@@Jam-iv6xz A Man Utd fan being biased towards United... no shit
Fozzy not wearing a football shirt this week got me shook.
Sorry , I need to put them all in the wash 😂😂
If you are prime Ronaldinho, you have world class abilities, but you don’t have good stats, what do you think is the reason?
There are a few possibilities, maybe you always dribbled past 7-8 players, pass it to player B, and he pass it to player C and score. So you never get any G/A, but your team win 5-0 every game because of you. Does it make you not a world class player? No. People who actually watch football will acknowledge that you are a world class player, despite that you are not getting good stats.
Do you think player B and C are world class because they have got amazing stats? No. They are so easy to be replaced in your team. Anyone can do their job.
A lot of kids today who know nothing about football. They judge players based on surface level stats without watching football matches. Having good/poor stats doesn’t mean you have/don’t have world class abilities.
Ronaldinho isn't a football player, he's a feeling. I live in Australia and he's the only player I've ever gotten up early to watch play in the champions league (my team never makes the champion's league, otherwise that might be different).
Absolutely shocking take on the Arsenal Leicester game. Vardy did nothing and was not a handful. Talking about Calafiori but not Skipp and Ndidi who should’ve been off objectively is abysmal analysis of the game. Also, degrading the value of Arsenals set piece coaching to “somebody has to do something to” for the opposition is unbelievable. Do you really think that opposition teams and coaches don’t work on that when we’ve been scoring so many corners for the past 2 years?
Arsenal are winning the league.
Got a heck of a chance
Here before people start crying about Goldbridge again
2mins in and i ( english is not my first language) don't understand 50% of the chat but i enjoy the vibe you men give off😂
Glad you like it mate
Palmer is more important to Chelsea than Haaland is to Man City yes. but if Palmer were back on City rn, he wouldn't be as important to them as he has been to Chelsea, and I say he wouldn't be as important to City as Haaland is to City.
after all,, he was doing great at City whenever he got minutes, its not like he moved to Chelsea and then got a ton better overnight,, he just was another great player amongst incredible ones. he got pushed out for a reason, they didn't need him
I wait for this every week like I used to wait for xmas day as a kid 🎉🎉🎉
Ipswich are going to survive.
They’ve got a bloomin good chance if they play like that all season
Where's the Spurs logo from the intro.
yes bruno slips,, but the fact his studs are thatttt high up I feel like it has to be red
And now it's overturned, means the Ref did give out the Red Card wrongly.
I don’t see how Rodri has a point about the 60/70 goals a season, he got injured like 5 games in a season which proves it doesn’t matter how many games you play…you can get injured any time
Correct. He only played 57 games last season. With a then 2-3 week break before the new season. No point at all. (I'm gonna say here that I'm being sarcastic. Just in case you don't have that perception available to you.)
@@OfficialCarebox well get a different job then, all you hear when players transfers happen is they all want to play in European competitions and now that they do they complain, change the wage so they get paid as they play and watch how many come out to say they want to play every game
The ref doesn't get a replay. First viewing it looked nasty. But the VAR guys can't justify a review bcus a high challenge was made while out of control (mid-slip). Unfortunate, there's no outrage to be had.
On a side-note...I think Rashford can't do anything. He stuck the burners on but being dispossessed meant he had to just run it off. It's not his fault the 10 men behind him failed to make a challenge
Oh my, all of y'all are mentioning that ten hag needs to go. But no one's saying the players are the biggest problem and it's them that needs to go
Yeah mate, they're going to sack $2billion worth of players instead of sacking a manager for $4million...hmmm
If VAR does nothing “I can’t believe they didn’t overturn it”
If VAR overturn it “why do they re-referee the game?”
I don’t think it was a red and it’s harsh, but as they said multiple times it was high and you can see why the ref gave it initially…to me that’s then not clear and obvious.
There are modern CB that good on ball like Van Dijk, and Laporte, Thiago Silva, and there are even more modern CB, they are lightning quick, and they even get into opponent box helping the attack, like Van De Ven, Gvardiol and Calafiori, football keep evolving more and more.
The season before Haaland joined Man City, they created 88.7 xG, scored 99 goals (scored 11 more goals than their xG). KDB was their top scorer, he scored 15 goals.
The season Haaland joined Man City, they created 78.6 xG, scored 94 goals (scored 22 more goals than their xG). Haaland was their top scorer, he scored 36 goals.
Haaland’s stats seem to look good, but he massively reduces his team’s xG. And he tries to use his great finishing to make up for it. Man City become more clinical, outperforming their xG by a larger amount, but they actually scored less in total with Haaland.
It’s like when you think there is a big discount in the supermarket, but in reality, the price is marked up by a lot before the discount is made, so you are actually paying more. You think a 90% off discount is good, but it’s really not.
Before he joins, if you look at their top scorer (15 goals), you might think that they are not clinical. If they had a clinical striker (over 30 goals), they will score a lot more. After he joins, they did become more clinical, but they score less in total.
This is becoming my favourite podcast. Mainly because you speak about every team not just the bigger clubs. My teams game (Ipswich) will get a good mention so I try and tune in. Good stuff lads.
Would you prefer a 50 goals per season striker, but because he always loses possession, and because of him, his team can’t create chances, they can only score 70 goals in total for a season?
Or would you prefer a 10 goals a season false 9, but because of his dribbling skills, tiki taka passes and other amazing attributes, his team can create so many chances, capable to score 120 goals in total per season?
What matters is to maximise the TOTAL number of goals your TEAM can score, not how many your striker can score.
There is no straight leg by Bruno, its a bent knee with ankle making side contact with Maddison in a clear yellow foul, never a RED if VAR does its job
first
Loke to see hwo they are tryng new ways to perform podcast
Personally
Bens intro
Music intro
Quick mate catch up
Then into the games
Bens energy at beginning of podcast is ⚡⚡⚡
Only Fozzy can win the quiz and feel like it's a trick. Awesome show and great quiz Young Jamie.
Watto, You've been to the Wednesday game, you talk about being at Wolves....When are you coming back to Oakwell to watch the boys?
This was far better without Goldbridge , he slated Carragher for saying exactly the same as Ben Foster says here about Delot.
The good thing about Maresca is he has set up differently against almost every team, depending on the oppositions tactics. Some games he has focused on possession and slow build up, some he's focused on counter attacking and allowed the opposition to control the ball and then hit them once they incepted the ball. Makes it very hard for coaches to know how to prepare for him.
He worth about the same...scary to think whatd have happened if they kept him! Imagine them BOTH on the same team 🤯 thatd be about 5x trebles lined up
Is Palmer more value that Haaland? About triple the price of that tap in merchant, without 10 guys to hold his hand he is useless
Every right back in the country knows rashford isn't going to attempt to tackle you or track back so it's a free run into midfield and beyond
I understand the quiz section is probably the most watched part, but that shouldn't be a reason to bombard people with constant ads
Look at Foxzies clompers at the beginning 😲
Someones watched stick to football and knows the behind the scenes are the best bits 😉
Lack of Gary Neville's pins and feet in their one tho.
Can you see him running past Gabrielle Saliba like that..he would have ended up in the first row
You have to be feeling something vague, if you don't notice you have forgotten to put your shoes and socks on. 🤣🤣🤣
U can tell he didn’t watch the game , Vardy did nothing , he was bullied by Saliba
Only casual fans would care about stats.
Look at Palmer’s silky/tekky touches/close control on the ball. The tricks/skill moves he does. The short combination tiki taka passes. The through passes. The possession loving mindset. The Spanish game reading and tactical understanding.
He is brilliant regardless of stats.
He’s top class
Start very inspired by stick to football with the random chat 🤣
The theme tune is awful 😂 change it Ben I thought you would have better taste 😂
One person needs to be the devils advocate to create a bit of a more 360 view
Huerzeler was very naive, but if Palmer didn't have that super game it could easily been a 2-2. Chelsea aren't that good yet.
if Palmer didn't have that game it could have still have been 6-0. Brighton had 1xG, and thats cos Sanchez gave them a tap in, if not for his two Bozo moments, they created nothing. There was also 3 marginally offside goals, hit the post twice, and about another 3-4 narrow misses from Chelsea.
Love the banter of the g nev stick to football podcast 😂😂
Who’s the next Utd manager Ben if you had a fiver on it? Would Eddie Howe leave Newcastle with his man now in the building at Old Trafford
Southgate.
He is just waiting for the appointment. Probably already has a verbal agreement with the Man Utd hierarchy after the interview.
The defenders are getting a lot of flack for VDVs run and rightly so but to me the DM, Urgarte also takes a lot of blame. By the time he thinks "I should come over to that side" VDV is at the edge of the box.
a lot of these runs start when man utd midfield loses the ball or turns it over. common culprits are casemiro, rashford, erikksen and bruno. all the teams know how to play against man utd. just run against their midfield, make sure to keep away from martinez and ugate and you can make it to their edge of the box in a few seconds. square it to the far post because there usually is nobody there. ez tap in.
been going on for 2 seasons.
I disagree with your comment on West Ham. We wanted different from Moyes, not one hammers fan wanted Lopetegui in so it's unfair to say that we just aren't happy with any style.
Thanks for commenting mate , and it’s cool to disagree, it would be boring if we all thought the same eh
Neville-like behind the scenes footage to kick off the episode!
Like three granny's sitting around at the start 😂😂😂
Nobody mentions why Skipp wasnt sent off.
Vardy did earn that freekick by faking a foul😂
Loved the relaxed start to the show. Mark not on anymore?
Palmer just started but you all keep talking about selling him.. Chelsea ain’t a small team.. show some respect
Just talking about value that’s all
Calm down ya 🍩
I see goldbridge is a no show then a bit like m utd this season 🤣
Hermansen had a fantastic game, and the fullback Justin with that volley. Goddamn.
Agreed
Pay him for the runners and don't be so tight.
So many adverts! Just want to watch it does ya head in
always look forward to these... thx gents
.. Ha! Love that intro. Keep it up lads. 😅
Always a good video keep up the good work
1:14:16 incorrect. Fulham also went to a shootout
That cold opening was brilliant lads 😂
This quiz is still a joke ya know. Pick a lane. Decide on a format and use the same rules.
I think that is the point to be fair, it is a laugh😅
UAE controle english football
Was the opening a nod to Stick to Football
10:08
VAR is for clear and obvious errors.
The decision the ref gave was not a clear and obvious error. Hence, the VAR did not tell the ref to take a look at the monitor.
The VAR is not there to correct every decision the ref makes. Otherwise, the game will go for 4 hours.
It's disappointing to watch a football show where the host doesn't know the basics of the rules and chats absolute nonsense.
It was pretty clear and obvious it wasn’t a red !!!!!
@thecyclinggk
Not really. The commentators agreed with the decision. The pundits at half time were split.
Social media appears to be split as well.
When you're seeing half of everyone saying it was a red, and the other half saying it was a yellow, then it is not clear and obvious.
Personally, I think the clear and obvious ruling is shit. But until it is changed, these are the things we have to keep dealing with.
They wanna be stick to football so bad
Stick to football influence on the intro
Jamie is so bad at reading the questions, he tries to change the wording and ends up making a mess of it 🙄🤣
That’s why we love him 😂🙌🏼
love the opening just chatting
That was the most laid back into yet haha
Has mark left permanently. Haven't seen him for weeks now?
SHOULD WE RIOT AGAIN?
Apparently their schedules clash. Seems like Goldbridge isn’t that bothered which is a shame.
@wilko3017 I hope they can do something with schedule cuz the og Dave Foster m mark is unbeatable love listening about football from these lads . Just maybe reschedule it to a diff day .
Haven't watched this since mark hasn't been on
2.1.1. 😂😂
Mark where are you lad 😂🤣
toin coss lmaooo I heard that watto
ben put those feet away gross
Thanks Guys 👏👏👏👏
Love that intro 😂.
nice show boys
That time again! 😍😁
Hi
The one day Mark should've been here
Every week at this rate.
Turned off when I seen fosters feet
Sorry geez 😂
Overlap style BTS at the beginning.... I like it!
Nah. It's shit.
Glad you like it
Sorry you don’t 😂
@@thecyclinggk 😂😂😂
Liam Delap came from Derby’s academy. Morgan Rogers came from West Brom’s academy. Man City did not *produce* them
Ben put ya toes away mate
Sorry 😂
@@thecyclinggk I’ll accept a pair of signed gloves as an apology
WE WANT MARK.
No we don't thanks
Dropped for a reason
@@damianbrowne847 ya I heard they had a 'fallout' :P
Watto is mad at Arsenal scoring set-pieces. It's not easy to man mark those giants. Arsenal has like 5 , 6'1 players..Saliba , Califiori, Kai , Rice , Gabriel..
And they're on verge of adding 2 others ,Merino & Tomiyasu.
Imagine on a corner, in swinger by Saka then 7 , 6'1 players in the box.. madness!!
Maybe Zonal marking can work.
Anyone please talk about Oliver Skipp getting away with a few dirty challenges ?????
Porto are the only team I've seen defend our set pieces well in the last couple of seasons. And even then I think a large part of that is due to Costa being very good, similar to raya, at cross claiming.