2023 Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 4x4 (190 PS) TEST DRIVE

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • 2023 Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 4x4
    140 KW / 187 HP / 190 PS
    2.0L Turbo Petrol Gasoline Engine
    1984 cm3 / 120.1 CUI
    4-Cylinder
    320 Nm / 236 ft-lb
    7-Speed Automatic
    TEST DRIVE
    Interior & Cockpit Design
    Exterior Design
    Driving & Sound
    Computer & Entertaiment on Board
    Light Night Design
    Fuel Consumption from 100 to 180 kmh (50 to 124 mph)
    Acceleration 0-200 kmh
    Top Speed German Autobahn
    #skoda #kodiaq #skodakodiaq #czechcar #skodasuv #cars #car

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @Mr11ESSE111
    @Mr11ESSE111 Рік тому +5

    not bad consumption for 4x4 190hp petrol SUV of this size and weight!! i think that some diesels SUV in same class consume more at higher speeds

  • @lost_daemon
    @lost_daemon Рік тому +2

    I sold my Octavia 2019 1.4T recently. The Kodiak will be my next most likely. I love Skoda kept the physical buttons and knobs in Kodiak unlike in last generations of Octavia where all vital settings can be tuned only on touchscreen.

  • @xxzmk
    @xxzmk Рік тому +6

    Its crazy how efficient these 2.0 litre petrol engines have become even in a huge package and 4wd.

    • @stuntevie
      @stuntevie Рік тому +1

      this is just unreal, we have the 1.5 petrol, it averages 7.6 at 120km/h
      the 2.0 is amazing

    • @plilp
      @plilp Рік тому

      Right!? I have a 2019 Kia Proceed 1.6 liter petrol with 204hp and it's consuming around 7.5 liter/100km when driving at 100km/h. And it's a light car with only front wheel drive.

    • @xxzmk
      @xxzmk Рік тому

      @@plilp Damn thats a lot. That is like consumption my older brother has with his Merc E350d 2016 when he is driving comfortably on a heavy car with 286hp and 600+nm torque on a 6 cylinder. But what am I doing here I am comparing a heavy 6 cylinder diesel to a lightweight 4 cylinder petrol. I myself drive a 318d manual F30 generation and do about 4,2-4,5 litres/ 100km whilst driving 120-130kph.

    • @plilp
      @plilp Рік тому

      @@xxzmk 318d so a diesel? They generally consume a little less, don’t they? Anyways I too think the consumption on my Proceed is high. I can get around 6.2l/100km in optimal conditions and driving a constant ~80km/h speed in a flat environment, but that’s rarely the case. The car has 98k kilometres and the average consumption according to the car’s computer is 7.8l/100km.

    • @xxzmk
      @xxzmk Рік тому +1

      @@plilp Hmm yeah but still for the great sound it puts out I think one can definetly live with such consumption. Heck I have seen worse cars consuming way more whatever you do.

  • @simon3461
    @simon3461 Рік тому +2

    Great car - big + cheap and with a very low fuel consumption !
    A bestseller from Skoda.

  • @Semenov777
    @Semenov777 Рік тому +3

    Great car! 👍

  • @iliandimitrov2695
    @iliandimitrov2695 Рік тому +1

    200 tdi that you tested one year ago is a lot faster. I dont expect it
    I dont know why

    • @ПЁТРПЁТР-е6ь
      @ПЁТРПЁТР-е6ь Рік тому +1

      нет не быстрее. Преимущество только до 120 км/час. А в общем бензин веселее, и как-то полегче едет. Проехал со скоростью 160-200 около часа, расход показал 10,4 литра.

  • @theobajerke
    @theobajerke Рік тому +1

    Schlechtes Frühjahr auch in Winterthur oder :D ?

  • @blazbohinc4964
    @blazbohinc4964 11 місяців тому

    this sportline has quite a bit of additional equipment options. I'd say at least 8 grand of options.. on top of of the trim price.

  • @DoLus88
    @DoLus88 8 місяців тому

    Which is better? 2.0 tdi 140/147 kw or petrol 140 kw?

  • @27jezus
    @27jezus 8 місяців тому

    Does it worth it to rent this car and post video? Can you make money out of this?

  • @jorgemacchiavello9988
    @jorgemacchiavello9988 Рік тому

    Why in Sport mode only 5 speed?

  • @stalkerpro1
    @stalkerpro1 Рік тому +1

    what about noise level test?

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  Рік тому +7

      is not 100% perfect test, because every smartphone does show different numbers (we are 3 drivers), and road surface is depending too, not everywhere has same road surface. Some road surface make lot noise and some are quiet etc...

    • @stalkerpro1
      @stalkerpro1 Рік тому

      @@TESTDRIVEFREAK thats true. Thank you for your tests!

  • @alxdava2004
    @alxdava2004 8 місяців тому

    In town is a interesting place to test the consumption

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  8 місяців тому

      We do that since summer 2023 with city fuel consumption. This video here is bit older

  • @pavelrusev938
    @pavelrusev938 7 місяців тому

    Is this sport line ? Or RS .. which one..

  • @Фантазер-й1к
    @Фантазер-й1к Рік тому

    нормально шпарит

  • @Aslaz1977
    @Aslaz1977 Рік тому +1

    This or the 2017 audi q7?

    • @EuRoNiX44
      @EuRoNiX44 Рік тому +5

      Q7 of course if you have the money

    • @Aslaz1977
      @Aslaz1977 Рік тому +2

      @@EuRoNiX44 but this new Skoda is more expensive than a second hand q7...

    • @EuRoNiX44
      @EuRoNiX44 Рік тому +3

      @@Aslaz1977 new is not always better, look at the comfort and the materials inside a Q7 compared to this car. But with costs I also meant the maintenance costs, because those will be higher than with the Skoda

    • @Aslaz1977
      @Aslaz1977 Рік тому +2

      @@EuRoNiX44 oh yes then you’re right about that no doubt

    • @Catchingcars
      @Catchingcars Рік тому +3

      The skoda Kodiaq kverall is a great car. I would still preferr the Q7 over this brand new Kodiaq however a Used Kodiaq RS or Lauren Klement would be my choice cheaper and overall a great SUV also. Very rare actually to find great new cars from Mainstream Cheaper brands. But this Kodiaq is one of them

  • @kobragamer452
    @kobragamer452 Рік тому +1

    Mercedes-Benz GLB