Absolutely outstanding documentary I subscribed immediately. The narrator is great and the graphics practically put you there with the subject. Thank you so much.
In paleo media, the fauna of this formation are often mixed with the fauna of the Nemegt Formation of the Maastrichtian stage of the Cretaceous period. In reality, the two formations couldn't have been more different. Djadochta was a wind-swept desert with sparse vegetation and small dinosaurs, while Nemegt was a lush paradise of conifer forests interspersed with rivers.
Three negative comments. The commenters are looking for the attention their lives lack of. An excellent documentary with amazing recreations of those long gone animals.
I'm old enough to remember illustrations of oviraptor as an egg-thief. Complete with the cutaway anatomical drawing showing how that strange beak shape was to accommodate an egg. Just shows how wrong paleontology can be and how rapidly the community will accept new data
Well there isn’t many rules for kids Dino books. Or at least not back then. Anyone could just go with a not well supported hypothesis, and slap it in a kid’s book, as fact, without waiting for any clarification.
It really speaks to the early bias against dinosaurs that when they first found a dino next to a nest of eggs their first thought was "egg thief" and not "mother"
When dealing with Dino’s, it’s always a good idea to keep this in mind first: we don’t know. We give our best guess. How can you say with such confidence, not a single therosorapter sliced anything with its claw?
@@gic8849 perhaps he has read and watched stuff about how latest research seems to not think slashing was a purpose. But i agree that he doesnt know and no one else either, we might have a good idea on what we think and whats most likely was correct, but we do not know.
@@Makabert.Abylon what we know about Dino’s is a lot more educated guesswork than factual. If something has a large claw ..it certainly will use that claw to hold its prey, but it may also use that claw as a tool to further begin to slice into its prey item, once it’s been completely disabled, to help get into those tasty inner bits much faster. We can’t say with absolute certainty how most of these prehistoric animals used their tools, let alone, in what way they used them every single time they needed to. We can only make our best guess. If one piece of literature says “it pierces the animal” and another says “it slices into the animal” They both could very well be true.
I love how the years go by and the "experts" just keep making up more and more dinosaurs! LOL. And out of a single bone or tooth no less! LOL . Wow such genius's they are!
A single bone or tooth is all that’s needed to identify a new species. Crimes can be solved with a single piece of evidence such as a finger print or hair.
@@FreedomAnderson But you can't just know how any animal is going to look, what they'll eat, how big, or anything else by just a tooth or bone! They find these tiny pieces and make up this whole scenario just out of their imaginations and then present them to the world like it's fact. It's a joke. Crimes can be solved by a finger print or hair but you can't know anything like color, build, food preferences, etc. Scientists just make this stuff up sometimes and people don't realize it. The have huge exhibits in museums of dinosaurs that they have fashioned out of a single tooth! Born from their vivid imaginations.
What i dont like is when they name them, i think it would be enough to say - we found a tooth and a toe bone from a mid sized carnivorous dinosaur dated at about 160 mil years, not known to science until now. Or something along that line..
That voice, I hopefully won't find to be AI, is such a gift. Very soothing and chock-full of learning, if I can stay awake in class...thanks for that.
This is the way a documentary should be narrated! Just excellent!
Greetings from the BIG SKY. Hell Creek is mighty interesting land to walk in.
Absolutely outstanding documentary I subscribed immediately. The narrator is great and the graphics practically put you there with the subject. Thank you so much.
The AI narrator is pretty good
@@Makabert.Abylon Love the AI guy! 🤣
In paleo media, the fauna of this formation are often mixed with the fauna of the Nemegt Formation of the Maastrichtian stage of the Cretaceous period. In reality, the two formations couldn't have been more different. Djadochta was a wind-swept desert with sparse vegetation and small dinosaurs, while Nemegt was a lush paradise of conifer forests interspersed with rivers.
What a cool documentary
Excellent video
Three negative comments.
The commenters are looking for the attention their lives lack of.
An excellent documentary with amazing recreations of those long gone animals.
I love the artist depicting a “owlasaurusrex”😂 that’s my taxonomy name for the drawing. Sorry, had to laugh. A cool documentary though, thanks.
The idea behind Jurassic Park was that something had gone horribly wrong when scientists meddled in resurrection of dinosaurs
if you ever do Cenozoic Formations pleas do the Hondo Group aka the formation Purussaurus was found in.
if you ever do Nemegt Formation
I'm old enough to remember illustrations of oviraptor as an egg-thief. Complete with the cutaway anatomical drawing showing how that strange beak shape was to accommodate an egg. Just shows how wrong paleontology can be and how rapidly the community will accept new data
Well there isn’t many rules for kids Dino books. Or at least not back then.
Anyone could just go with a not well supported hypothesis, and slap it in a kid’s book, as fact, without waiting for any clarification.
Excellent - but what's a 'doon' ?
Gracile slender animals live there
It really speaks to the early bias against dinosaurs that when they first found a dino next to a nest of eggs their first thought was "egg thief" and not "mother"
Thesororaptor or Thesaurusraptor?
It used its claw for writing. That's obvious! Hence the thesaurus
D'uh...!
The therosorapter did not use the big clew for slicing but for stalling and piercing the animal to hold it
When dealing with Dino’s, it’s always a good idea to keep this in mind first: we don’t know. We give our best guess.
How can you say with such confidence, not a single therosorapter sliced anything with its claw?
@@gic8849 perhaps he has read and watched stuff about how latest research seems to not think slashing was a purpose. But i agree that he doesnt know and no one else either, we might have a good idea on what we think and whats most likely was correct, but we do not know.
@@Makabert.Abylon what we know about Dino’s is a lot more educated guesswork than factual. If something has a large claw ..it certainly will use that claw to hold its prey, but it may also use that claw as a tool to further begin to slice into its prey item, once it’s been completely disabled, to help get into those tasty inner bits much faster.
We can’t say with absolute certainty how most of these prehistoric animals used their tools, let alone, in what way they used them every single time they needed to.
We can only make our best guess.
If one piece of literature says “it pierces the animal” and another says “it slices into the animal”
They both could very well be true.
I really wanted to watch the videos on this channel. But the narrator is just so tiring to listen to. He seems to have zero enthusiasm for the topics.
Really dude??? It could be a lot worse than this! This isn’t even bad.
Listen while you're trying to sleep 😊
You spent one minute talking about nothing
I love how the years go by and the "experts" just keep making up more and more dinosaurs! LOL. And out of a single bone or tooth no less! LOL . Wow such genius's they are!
A single bone or tooth is all that’s needed to identify a new species. Crimes can be solved with a single piece of evidence such as a finger print or hair.
@@FreedomAnderson But you can't just know how any animal is going to look, what they'll eat, how big, or anything else by just a tooth or bone! They find these tiny pieces and make up this whole scenario just out of their imaginations and then present them to the world like it's fact. It's a joke. Crimes can be solved by a finger print or hair but you can't know anything like color, build, food preferences, etc. Scientists just make this stuff up sometimes and people don't realize it. The have huge exhibits in museums of dinosaurs that they have fashioned out of a single tooth! Born from their vivid imaginations.
What i dont like is when they name them, i think it would be enough to say - we found a tooth and a toe bone from a mid sized carnivorous dinosaur dated at about 160 mil years, not known to science until now.
Or something along that line..
Right there with you. Little doubt that there is some fabrication going on. How do you disprove them? You can't.
Just a small point: there is no such thing as a 'creature'.
Lots of talking, but not much doing. Very disappointing.
um..2:35.. is that a human skull he's brushing off? lol
😵
😆🤣😭
I saw it too! 😂