Wunderschön ist diese Musik. In späteren Volksliedern hört man sie ansatzweise und wahrscheinlich geklauterweise wieder. Mozart ist einfach gigantisch. Trotzdem war die Rokkoko-Zeit nur für bestimmte Menschen wirklich lebenswert. Welches Glück haben heute bloß, diese Musik einfach über das Internet anhören zu können.
Several reasons for the dubious nature of this tafelmusik, proving how Mozart is perhaps the easiest composer to replicate, but it is nevertheless beautiful.
K 289/271g comes down to us only via parts and score copies, all dating from the second half of the 19th century and attributed to Mozart, but no autograph is known. Based on its structure, however, it is highly unlikely that it was actually composed by Mozart: the decidedly obsolete writing seen from the many consecutive fifths and octaves, sometimes involving even the outer parts, the constant motion in parallel thirds and comparative lack of fantasy in the use of the horns, speaks against the authenticity of the piece.[4] The NMA presents it as a work of dubious authenticity, and, most likely for this reason, it is generally not included in performances or recordings of the set of five.
Esta obra no es de Mozart, le fue atribuida por diversas copias encontradas pero en todo momento se nota que el ingenio que hay en los K213, 240, 252, 253 y 270 no está presente en este K289, que además posee recursos demasiado simples que Mozart no utilizaba de esta manera, a saber: paralelismos flojos y no tan consistentes para un Mozart auténtico, cornos demasiado simples que solo completan armonías, en fin..una linda obra para disfrutar pero no para comerse el verso de la historia
this divertimento is absolutely a forgy, otherwise i think it was maybe written to be intentionally monotonous by Mozart. anyway, it is too boring and ....interesting
Wunderschön ist diese Musik. In späteren Volksliedern hört man sie ansatzweise und wahrscheinlich geklauterweise wieder. Mozart ist einfach gigantisch. Trotzdem war die Rokkoko-Zeit nur für bestimmte Menschen wirklich lebenswert. Welches Glück haben heute bloß, diese Musik einfach über das Internet anhören zu können.
I had never bothered listening to the Divertimenti until I happened to hear K.287 with its astonishing 15-minute Adagio. Never underestimate Mozart.
Thank you for the suggestion; I'm going to listen to it, K. 287.
try K136-K138
Magnifique Musique ce Divertimento pour instruments à Vents ! d'une magnifique justesse dans les tempo !, je n'ai jamais entendu ce Divertimento !.
Mozart deu a essa forma tão bem trabalhada por antecessores, especialmente os Tchecos timbres e sutilezas únicas.
Acuta osservazione.
At the risk of sounding monotonous, I cannot say enough about the genius of WAM.
Don't worry because you actually said nothing about WAM
@@citizent6999 witty.
a tip : watch series at flixzone. Me and my gf have been using them for watching a lot of movies during the lockdown.
@Jayceon Julien Yea, I have been using Flixzone for months myself :D
Several reasons for the dubious nature of this tafelmusik, proving how Mozart is perhaps the easiest composer to replicate, but it is nevertheless beautiful.
What 's a great music
K 289/271g comes down to us only via parts and score copies, all dating from the second half of the 19th century and attributed to Mozart, but no autograph is known. Based on its structure, however, it is highly unlikely that it was actually composed by Mozart: the decidedly obsolete writing seen from the many consecutive fifths and octaves, sometimes involving even the outer parts, the constant motion in parallel thirds and comparative lack of fantasy in the use of the horns, speaks against the authenticity of the piece.[4] The NMA presents it as a work of dubious authenticity, and, most likely for this reason, it is generally not included in performances or recordings of the set of five.
Esta obra no es de Mozart, le fue atribuida por diversas copias encontradas pero en todo momento se nota que el ingenio que hay en los K213, 240, 252, 253 y 270 no está presente en este K289, que además posee recursos demasiado simples que Mozart no utilizaba de esta manera, a saber: paralelismos flojos y no tan consistentes para un Mozart auténtico, cornos demasiado simples que solo completan armonías, en fin..una linda obra para disfrutar pero no para comerse el verso de la historia
this divertimento is absolutely a forgy, otherwise i think it was maybe written to be intentionally monotonous by Mozart.
anyway, it is too boring and ....interesting