Charlie Javice Allegedly Committed the MOST Fascinating White Collar Crime
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 лип 2024
- Let's talk about white-collar crime. In my experience, I have been a part of various cases where individuals unknowingly commit crimes, knowingly engage in fraudulent activities, or maintain their innocence despite facing criminal charges.
In this article and video, we will dive into the different facets of white-collar crime, exploring the motives behind such actions and the consequences of one's response to criminal charges.
Unintentional/Did Not Know:
Individuals may sometimes find themselves unknowingly involved in white-collar crimes. Take, for example, the scenario of a doctor who believes they are making legitimate payments for marketing fees but later discovers that these payments are, in fact, kickbacks. This lack of awareness about the true nature of their actions can be attributed to a lack of transparency or deliberate manipulation by others involved in the scheme. These people eventually face charges, as ignorance of the law is not considered a valid defense.
Calculated Risk-Takers - The Gamble of Not Getting Caught:
Another category of white-collar criminals comprises individuals who knowingly engage in fraudulent activities, fully aware of the illegality of their actions. Many engage in crimes knowing, if they get caught, what the potential sanction could be.
The Perils of Willful Blindness:
Some white-collar crimes manifest as willful blindness, where individuals (like me) deliberately ignore or turn a blind eye to illegal activities. They indirectly perpetuate the crimes by choosing not to acknowledge or address such actions. While they may not be directly involved, the law holds them accountable for their complicity through intentional ignorance.
Case Study: Charlie Javice and the Art of Deception:
One recent case highlighting the reality of individuals knowingly committing white-collar crimes and expecting to evade punishment is that of Charlie Javice. Javice, the founder of Frank, a college financial aid company, defrauded JPMorgan Chase for $175 million during the acquisition process. She fabricated data and inflated user counts to deceive Chase. Javice's scheme reflects the mindset of those who believe they can commit crimes without repercussions.
The Role of Motive and Response in Sentencing In white-collar crime cases, the motives behind the criminal acts and the responses of the accused individuals significantly impact the severity of their sentences.
Acknowledging and taking immediate responsibility for the crime can lead to a reduced sentence. Similarly, if the criminal activities were limited to a shorter duration, such as weeks instead of months or years, it may also contribute to a less severe sentence. When the government perceives that the sole motive is personal gain and the individual acts brazenly, underestimating the likelihood of getting caught, the repercussions tend to be severe.
White-collar crime presents a complex landscape where individuals may find themselves unwittingly involved, knowingly taking risks, maintaining their innocence in court, ignoring wrongdoing, or even committing crimes with the misguided belief that they will never face the consequences. The case of Charlie Javice exemplifies the case of someone who just figured she would never get caught--there is no other explanation.
If someone is under investigation, taking proactive steps to navigate the process effectively is crucial. First and foremost, being proactive requires a deep understanding of the charges levied against you. This goes beyond a mere reading of the indictment or the criminal complaint.
1: Researching to comprehend the elements of the offense, enabling you to strategize your defense better.
2: It is essential to contemplate the vast resources that prosecutors have at their disposal.
3: Recognizing the potential tools and evidence they can utilize against you is crucial in preparing a solid defense.
4: Consider the responses of other individuals involved in the case and their potential impact on your defense strategy.
5: Assessing your available financial and other resources is essential to a proactive defense.
6: A comprehensive understanding of the sentencing guidelines applicable to your case is imperative.
7: Knowing the potential range of penalties and the factors that can mitigate or aggravate your sentence allows for informed decision-making during plea negotiations or trials.
Defenders can navigate the legal system more effectively by investing time, effort, and resources in proactive defense measures, ensuring that all relevant parties understand and consider their motives.
Justin Paperny
P.S. Read the blog here: www.whitecollaradvice.com/cha...
Phone : - +1 818-424-2220
I am not involved in anything illegal I'm a retired corporate type but I am FASCINATED by your channel and your content. I will tell you that the Charlie Javice story will keep me coming back. Please give us your insights on this one because I believe the Millennial generation feels "entitled" to having things their way and being able to say and do what they want because they think they are smarter than everyone else and they are used to being told how smart they are---getting a trophy for showing up. Please keep up updated on this case. Great channel and content; even for us boring dorky types.
Highly interesting! And very impressive how you are delivering in the live talk setting!
Thank you so much for watching. Glad to have you here!
Hi Justin
Im very curious about what you think about Elizabeth Holmes stating she cannot pay $250 a month in retribution payments ? I have many thoughts about this.
Okay I’ll film it today. So many have asked. I’ve titled it: Elizabeth Holmes-the video I didn’t want to make
Another brilliant, with a raw honest straight-up outline Justin, your very positive helpful manner makes it even more fascinating.
I am striving to provide value! Thank you for the awesome comment. I have another live coming soon. They are fun--just one take and get it out there!
I've been waiting for this one. I love your content
Thank you so much!!
Hell review southern Mississippi crime lately in last ten years. Unbelievable what we have heard on the media. Tens of millions and we wonder why all of them are not sitting in the prison.
I see referral fees as kickbacks. Physician fees, referral fees, whatever they refer to a kickback as now!
Charlie was IMO delusional and dazed in this era of Toxic social media.
Hi Justin great vid thank you! Have you heard anything about Elizabeth Holmes and how she’s getting on in her first few weeks? Would be so interesting to know! ❤
Thank you for watching. Yes, I have some updates from clients at Bryan and am contemplating sharing in a way that is ethical, positive and not sensationalized. Still thinking of appropriate messaging.
@@WhiteCollarAdviceOfficial That is brilliant, I look forward to it and really hope you do it soon! Love and respect to you. ❤️
Hi Justin first of all love your videos. I need to ask you a question? I notice huge jump in white collar crimes especially among young people. Why in your opinion so many young people willing to throw their lives away to be something there not. Sam Bankman Fried is a perfect example. I hope you respond to my question. Thank you
I've heard of the Charlie Javice case recently. She actually hired IT staff to "doctor" the numbers. I suspect a couple of those guys are "singing".
Correct
Would the American Justice System not be cheaper and better if defendants were taken straight to Federal Prison immediately after conviction? The American justice system seems to drag on forever and is very expensive.
As a medical student I wouldn’t have thought that doctor was breaking the law but I will concede however, it was perhaps a little unethical. And I guess that should have been a clue.
Crime is crime - regardless of the color of the collar.
When you are charged, your case represents your reputation, your good name, and essentially your life. It is very, very important to you. But the prosecution sees it as one of many cases. Unless you are a celebrity or your case has become newsworthy and is being tracked in the national media, a prosecutor doesn't care about you personally at all. Prosecutors care about prosecuting the case as efficiently as possible to achieve the maximum consequence. That is their job. The judge in the case wants procedure to be correct, your rights protected, and justice for the victims. But when found guilty or when you plead guilty, everything changes. Your status is not defendant it is offender. You are no longer presumed innocent and your motivations presumed innocent. As an offender, you now are guilty and your motivations are now viewed under the general perspective that guilty offenders will say anything they can to minimize their sentence. The value of what you say drops almost to zero. It is your actions, especially in accepting responsibility, acknowledging the impact of your crimes, and doing what you can to make restitution to the victims that speaks the loudest. As discussed many times on this channel and elsewhere, your pre-sentence investigation report is critical. This is truly the point where your actions speak louder than words in determining the impact of being found guilty on your future.
What if their are no victims?
Why do I get the feeling that a good part of your audience are people facing trial, indictment, etc.
Good assessment
I had taken somewhat of an interest in this case since I had worked in the area of financial aid for higher education so I read what I could to understand what had happened. What mystified me was that the level of free resources in this area that can be found in high school counselors, college financial aid offices, various community agencies and some government agencies and, of course, resources on the internet like software programs that one could use on their own. So, I was unclear why an individual would want this service and also why a business buying the business did not call college or university financial aid offices or business office to ask their thoughts. Bare minimum research would be all that was needed to get a grasp on whether or not this was a good move. I'm not trying to second guess any business buying this service but it is obvious to me a little looking under the hood of the concept would give one a good perspective on whether buying the Javice business was the right move.
I wonder how many people Jamie Dimon failed for doing crappy diligence on this deal. I bet it was quite a few.
was the hacker you talked about Nicholas Truglia ?
No
DON'T TRUST LAWYERS
Many are capable. Still they must be held accountable.
Chase spends 200M with no 3rd party due diligence?
Shareholders should be concerned
So funny how people do froudulent crimes and think no one will know no one will see 🙈
OMG. You had to talk to Dr's while walking around a track? 😂. That's not prison. And ignorance of the law isn't an excuse. Give us a break 😭😭 What nerve you've got. Someone needs a wake up call. 😮
I never went to prison, but I visited people in prison. Sitting down in the cafeteria, most of the people I saw had families, and they didn’t look like obvious crooks. They just made a mistake. And when they got out, they were good people with good families.
5:44 Yes.
Now I must go to the 5:44 make and see what I said!