Sony 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 OSS G Master Review | 4K
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 сер 2024
- Photographer Dustin Abbott reviews the versatile and compact Sony FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS telephoto zoom. | Read the Text Review: bit.ly/100_400... | Visit the Image Gallery: bit.ly/100_400... | Purchase the Sony 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 G Master @ B&H Photo bhpho.to/2Y6fXdJ | Amazonamzn.to/2S7acZB | Amazon Canada amzn.to/2Y73Hti | Amazon Germany amzn.to/2KzA643 | Ebay bit.ly/100_400GM
Sony a9 Camera @ B&H Photo bhpho.to/2HyWIyt | Amazon amzn.to/2B4NAjh | Amazon Canada amzn.to/2peQkbn | Amazon UK amzn.to/2M7XPcY | Amazon Germany amzn.to/2VHbDOP | Ebay bit.ly/Sonyalpha9
Purchase the Sony a7RIV @ B&H Photo bhpho.to/2nUgnno | Amazon amzn.to/2oGpVD1 | Amazon Canada amzn.to/2mY8UDW | Amazon UK amzn.to/2n9GWF3 | Amazon Germany amzn.to/2nXhene | Ebay bit.ly/a7RIVda
Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at:
B&H Photo: bhpho.to/1TA0Xge
Ebay: bit.ly/DustineBay
Make a donation via Paypal: paypal.me/dustinTWI
Get a discount off all Skylum Editing Software (Luminar, Aurora HDR, AirMagic) by using code DUSTINHDR at checkout: bit.ly/LuminarDLA
Become a Patron: / dustinabbott | Check me out on: Personal Website: dustinabbott.net/ | Sign up for my Newsletter: bit.ly/1RHvUNp | Instagram: bit.ly/DLAinsta | Google+: bit.ly/24PjMzv | Facebook: on. 1nuUUeH | Twitter: bit.ly/1RyYxIH | Flickr: bit.ly/1UcnC0B | 500px: bit.ly/1Sy2Ngu
My filming setup: Sony a7R III: B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2D6ibNO or Amazon: amzn.to/2CNxOvH | or | Sony a9 @ B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2HyWIyt or Amazon: amzn.to/2s1vYE0
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 RXD @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2FA00la or Amazon amzn.to/2G2kaEr
Lights: Rotolight AEOS @B&H Photo bhpho.to/2IK7mqV | Genaray Contender @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/33HbGNM | and Aputure AL-MW: bhpho.to/2N3MtZV
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Keywords: Sony 100-400mm, 100-400mm G Master, 100-400mm GM, 100-400GM, Sony 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 G Master, F4.5-5.6 G Master, GM, 100-400, 100-400mm, Sony, 135GM Review, 100-400mm G Master Review, Review, Dustin Abbott,, FE, Sony, a7R3, a7RIII, Sample Images, Tracking, Video Test, UA-cam, Comparison, Sharpness, Video, Zeiss, Sony a7RIII, Sony A7RIV, Sony a7R IV, Sony a9, Hands On, Video Test, Portrait, Video, Sharpness, Real World, Comparison - Наука та технологія
![[UA] Team Vitality проти NAVI | IEM Cologne 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wttO1zVRTC0/mqdefault.jpg)
Your high quality and unbiased reviews are the reason why I’m one of your subscriber, hi from France 🇫🇷 btw😉
That's great feedback, Dan. Thank you.
Mr A another spot on review, I have both 100-400 and 200-600, 6 months ago I started using both on the A7R4 and I find a slight IQ improvement with the Gmaster. On occasions where I am balancing cropping against the extra reach of the 600, the 600 starts to have an advantage. You are dead on about the portability of the 400 and I can walk through the woods all day with that lens, not so much with the 600 which I try to get on a monopod as soon as I can, lol. If I could only have one it would be the 100-400 but I am blessed to have had the funds for both 🙏😊. I happy to see you posting videos and I hope it means you and your loved ones are safe while the world is in chaos, I am right in the middle of it as I work in NY as a first responder, godspeed my friend
I'm glad my insights match yours. I'm also glad you are doing okay in the midst of the crisis. I watch New York's results every day and am glad to see the downward trend, though it seems like Jersey has become the new epicenter
@@DustinAbbottTWI New Jersey is where I live now and my own opinion is that many more people than we originally thought are actually infected but displayed only mild symptoms, I think one of the reasons for the uptick and confirmed infections is the increased testing that has now become widely available
I see that IQ improvement on the GM as well between the two lens, in colour and contrast. Mark Smith later observed the same thing. Stay safe on the front lines @Longrider
@Longrider = absolutely right.
This lens never leaves my bag. I absolutely love it. I got a good deal on it used and so I chose it over the 200-600 because while I occasionally shoot wildlife, I also like telephoto landscape photography, and 100-400 was a more versatile range for what I shoot. It made a nice upgrade from the 70-300 G lens I was using before.
It is a very versatile package.
I came from the 70-300, that was honestly awful. I got this one since 2 years and it worth every penny
I have this lens from a year and a half now. It never failed me. It fits in my bag when i travel and gettin on a plane. Always sharp, always precise. I love it.
That portability is a big factor.
I'm actually lucky enough to own both the 100-400mm and the 200--600mm and the primary difference in what I pack is simply activity and size. The 100-400mm is great for sports games and medium distance birds on a casual bird walk. It also packs better and goes on vacations, offering chances to capture birds I would never have had otherwise. Unless the sole purpose of your travel is wildlife photography, no one is packing the 200-600mm into their carry-on. The 200-600mm is for the person who is sure they will be birding (or other wildlife shooting) and wants the best image possible by having the reach. I think the 100-400 is the Swiss Army knife but if you just want to photograph wildlife, as Dustin says, just go with the 200-600mm and be a happier shooter (if only because of the internal zoom)
Hi Adam, your feedback is almost dead on with Longriders
Great review. I chose the 100-400. I think the Sony 24-105 and the Sony 100-400 is a great two lens setup.
Definitely - that's from wide angle right through long telephoto.
That’s what I’m thinking... I have the 24-105 already and I feel the 100-400 is the obvious choice to have everything covered.
Thanks Dustin! Still my favorite reviews to watch! Never change.
Thank you very much!
Love this review and also the 200-600 just because it has Doggos running around! :D but seriously,i always search a video about lens AF capability when the subject is running towards the camera to see its true capability in the hardest scenario and you’re the one who provides it,even about the 85mm shoot out! Thank you so much and God Bless you Sir!
I'm glad my reviews help out!
I've had this lens for about a month. There hasn't been another lens on my camera since I've gotten this. I love this lens. Makes me want a a7r4 so i could go into cropped sensor mode and still have 28 megapixels with almost to 600 ml reach.
That is perhaps the most beneficial aspect of the extremely high resolution of the a7RIV
Good job, Dustin. As always. Very thorough and to-the-point.
Glad it was helpful!
Hi, I recently purchased the Canon EF 100-400 L lens to use on my Sony a7III with a Metabones adapter. I should have watched a previous video of yours where you reviewed Canon lens on Sony cameras. Although the Canon lens has gorgeous color and excellent sharpness, it hunted a lot in low light, even when I cranked up the ISO on my Sony. Needless to say, I returned the Canon lens and instead purchased the native Sony 100-400 GM lens. What a difference is focusing and speed! My only quibble is that I wish it had full-time manual focus override. Otherwise, i love it. Thank you for another excellent review! 👍🏼🙏🏼👋🏼
Yes, there's a night and day difference to autofocus performance with a native vs adapted lens.
Just watched for the first time, very informative and insightful, definitely clicking that like button. I am wracking my brain, trying to decide whether to get the 70-200 or the 100-400.
Glad it was helpful!
Great short review Dustin. Hope you are doing well and are safe and healthy. Cheers from LA.
I'm doing well, thank you.
Awesome review. You have nailed it!
Thank you.
Great review Dustin. I have been using the lens for 6 months and very impressed with the versatility. I was using my Canon 400mm f4 DO adapted which was sharper however the AF considerably slower on my A7R3.
The A7R3 AF works good/OK in good light however the A9 would sometimes be a better option for me for wildlife.
That sounds about right to me.
Thanks for another great review Dustin. After great deliberation I chose the 100-400 over the 200-600 because of its quite exceptional close up ability. I find the very short minimum focus makes it ideal for nature photography enhancing its focal range. I have also used it with the 2x extender and an extension tube and get great results with plants and insects. Mind you I only paid about USD$1800 here in Australia for the 100-400GM.
That is one of the chief advantages of the 100-400 GM.
Great review, thanks! Is the Definitive review will be available soon?
This coming Friday. I didn't actually intend to release this ahead of schedule (I intended to release the standard review of the Tamron 70-180!)
P.S. You can actually find a way to access the definitive review by going to the text review (link in the description) and it is available there.
Another excellent review!
Thanks again!
Superb review. The link for text review is not right .(its of Tamron 70-180mm)
That's because I made the wrong video public. I was supposed to release the standard review of the Tamron 70-180!
Excellent review - very well addressing the concerns of potential users.
I would love to see a similar review on the Sony 70-350 lens for APS-C.
Coming soon! I bumped that review in favor of doing the Sony 24-240mm first to compare with the Tamron 28-200mm while I still have the loaner of that lens.
Hmm. I’m not sure if I want this lens or a 70-180 f2.8 (or 70-200 f2.8). Nice review!
I'm glad it helps.
I planned to get the 70-180 for travel, but then the price was 2/3 of the GM, so I got that just before the last price increase of the GM, which is half the price of the Tamron. Now the 200-600 costs the same as the GM 1 year ago, and almost the same as the Tamron. Prices are crazy for the time, as our currency crashed together with oil prices. Will buy a 24-105 for travel later, if travelling ever becomes possible again? Shot today handheld with the GM: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PermaLiv_Hovinsholm_g%C3%A5rd_04-05-20.jpg
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PermaLiv_Tors%C3%A6terskaret_04-05-20.jpg
Thanks!
That's really great
Thank you.
Great review. Im torn between the Tamron 70-180 and the Sony 100-400. I will mostly use it for sport like Track and Field, Rugby and Cricket. I currently have the Sony A9 with the Tamron 28-75 and need a longer lens, but not sure which one to get. Where im from there is not a big difference in price. At the moment there is a special on all Sony Lenses and the Tamron is way more expensive here than in the US. There is only about $550 difference between the two lenses. But im leaning towards the Sony. Hope i am making the right decision.
Foto4Max that is why im torn between the two lenses. Both have there advantages and disadvantages. One has F2.8. But the other has 400 reach I’ve decided to go with the Sony 100-400. If the Tamron was $ 1200 here it would have been a no brainer. Hope i made the right decision
I would say with the price differences and your stated goal, you've made the right choice.
Excellent review, Dustin! I’m a passionate wildlife photography. I finally decided for the A7RIV with the 200-600 G lens, without any focusing issues, so I’m really happy with this combo. I must say I had my doubts whether should I had bought the 100-400 GM for its IQ and focusing speed, but after practicing more with the 200-600 G, I must say it’s amazing. Maybe some day, I’ll test the 100-400 GM, but for now... will stick to the 200-600 G. Excellent review! Thank you for sharing!
It's a lot of lens for the money.
Thanks for the review, where can I find the long review for this lens? Also do you think temron will release lens that will be cheaper and have similar focal length?
I actually made this video public by accident (I was supposed to release the short format of the Tamron 70-180). My definitive review of this lens and the text review will come next week.
Great review!
Thanks!
Hey Dustin. Now that you own the canon r5 do you think the af with the canon version of this lens on the r5 would be as good as (or better than) the Sony version on the a9.
As good as, yes, but not really better.
Dustin ..... Dustin....great review Dustin..... you are really great
Thank you very much.
Dustin, have you done any tests against the canon version? The price of it makes it appealing to adapt. You mention something but not sure if it's on an a7 series
The definitive review will show optical comparisons, but autofocus is simply not in the same class at all when adapting. The only way I would recommend buying the Canon if you planned to shoot on Sony is if you prioritize shooting Canon and Sony work is secondary.
Has the Definitive Review been posted? Can't find it.
I actually posted this review by accident. I was supposed to be making the Standard review of the Tamron 70-180mm public. Opps!
I gave a thumbs up to the review but just a tad of CC. I don't own a Canon and don't plan to get one but a quarter of this review is about a lens that very few need that information on unless they haven't bought into the Sony ecosystem yet.
That's fair, Troy, though I find that most people prefer to have some kind of benchmark - some frame of reference.
Gracias
You're welcome.
Thank you for great review Dustin. I think the main difference between Sony 100 400 vs 200 600 is when you use cheaper bodies. I have tried both on A7III and a6400, the auto focus is day and night difference between two lenses. The 100 400 is much faster and better contrast and color. I compared A7III with 200 600 and A6400 with 100 400 which give the same length. The photos with a6400 are much sharper and auto focus is much much faster than 200 600. And 200 600 does not like filters, if you put on a filter, it decreases IQ...
Hmmm, that doesn't actually make sense in theory, as lens performance is independent of camera performance. If you were talking a major resolution difference, that might potentially be true.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you so much for reply. I know, I could not figure out. I really hoped 200 600 will work out, because it will be less expensive and has longer reach. I mostly doing birds in flight (instagram.com/gmb_wildlife_photography/). But I got way better result with a6400 with 100 400. Since I am doing it just for hobby not career. It does not justify to buy a A9 or A7Rvi bodies. I am sure the result will be different.
Which wireless mic do you use - I checked the description but I don't think it is listed.
I use the Rode SmartLav+: bhpho.to/2xEpk5m
superb but expensive, for the average enthusiast user who'd take this out on travels once or twice a year, rental is a much better choice than purchase in my opinion.
That is a valid point, actually. For many people that only rarely shoot such a lens, a rental is a solid idea.
zoomers: links
boomers: linkage
Can I use this on my old 7xi...I would love get it out of the closet .. it was never really used
Not that I'm aware of
But is it better than the Canon EF 100-400 ii on a 1DX Mark iii?
I haven't tested that combo, but I doubt it is any better. Mirrorless packs AF points across the entire sensor.
@@DustinAbbottTWI I've got the 100-400 ii on EOS R and debating my purchase over an A7Riii, figured I'll just use my lenses for the R5 when it comes out, hence being slightly interested in actual real world use of this Sony 100-400.
The Canon will never focus as fast as the Sony no matter what camera you put it on. It's just the nature of the focus motors in both lenses.
Would you recommend this lens for me. Shots ?
With all due respect, I've got a whole review series designed to help you make an informed decision. I'm not really here to try to make that decision for you, as you know better than I what your shooting needs and budget are.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks mate.
Hey Dustin what r ur thoughts about the upcoming canon r5?
Are you excited?
Do you think canon will be competing directly this time with sony?
Im more into the eos r6 if the rumors are correct.
I am excited for it. I've actually sold off some gear and have saved money for it in hopes that it lives up to the potential.
@@DustinAbbottTWI wow...now iam also hyped...😃
Im want the tamron to release a cheaper and maybe a lighter 100-400 or something like that (70-400, 100-450 etc).
The vxd motor in 70-180 seems pretty fast.
Let's see...😉😉
Agreed. I suspect that's a gap that third parties will jump into.
Sigma made a 100-400 lens for sony
@@sybtb1azeken149 yes, but im waiting for tamron to make something. anyway, i'll be getting 28-200 first. lets see if tmron can make something like a 100-500 or 200-600 albeint cheaper and compact.
Nice review, Dustin. I'm curious if you have tested Fuji's 100-400 and, if so, do you have a subjective sense of the IQ differences between the two lenses.
Hi Timothy, I haven't covered Fuji's 100-400 yet. I've been slowly working through their back catalog.
Dustin Abbott Cool. That gives me something to look forward to then.
Why are they white, I need em black to match my G Master 35, 50, 85
That’s definitely an age-old debate. Some want them white, some black. The new Tamron 50-400mm is an excellent alternative…and it’s black.
looks like you forgot the image gallery link
That's because I made the wrong video public. I was supposed to release the standard review of the Tamron 70-180!
Is the Sigma 100-400 superior about image quality?
No, but pretty close to the same.
I thought I've seen the 75 in the title.. and see the 100.. ohh well seen it also for future purchase although the 600 is more my type :p
I too am quite interested in the 200-600
This lens look to be awesome, but also terrible over priced.
Agreed on both counts.