9:20 - The fact the D-Max can be driven at normal passenger car speed limits on single & dual carriageways in the UK unlike most other pick-ups basically makes it the Bugatti Veyron of pick-up trucks.
This bakkie (as we call it in SA) is still unbreakable... simple, honest bakkie with a modern touch.... problem is - people don't seem to be sure whether they want a bakkie or an SUV
Great review, I was M on a lot of sites and These started to appear this year, it looks live a great value all-rounder, I would be interested in the auto version. 👍
It was the previous RT D-Max that was badged the Holden/Chev Colorado, not the current shape RG, even though Holden used the 'RG' designation for their RT derivative. Maybe that caused the confusion?
I am sure the D Max will be tough and reliable - but having just driven a V-Max, (after a test drive in a new Amarok) it is basic and agricultural. Noisy engine, bouncy ride and feels cheap. Similar to the Hilux in many ways
I have a 1.9 D'max auto which I bought new in 2019. It's been great in the Scottish Highlands and I get 36 mpg which is awesome. My mate has an Amarok and he's getting 18 mpg 😳. If you have an endless wallet go for the Amarok as it is a bit more luxurious but I'm happy with my D'max.
The new 1.9 is supposedly better than the 2.5 as I guess it's an all new engine and it has a new gearbox. There's a channel called Lord Muck and he did a review of this truck and he reckoned the new 1.9 is better than the 2.5 and although he never tried the 1.9 id imagine if the 1.9 is better than the 2.5 then it's definitely better than the old 1.9 engine.
@@devilsadvocate2548 Here in the UK and Europe, we don't get the 3.0-litre engine, and only the 1.9 is offered - I wonder why? I believe it could be due to emissions?
9:20 - The fact the D-Max can be driven at normal passenger car speed limits on single & dual carriageways in the UK unlike most other pick-ups basically makes it the Bugatti Veyron of pick-up trucks.
I’m in the US and I would buy this in a heart beat, very cool truck
We get it as the Chevy Colorado.
Very well thought of kind of a review.
Where can I sign you up lol
This bakkie (as we call it in SA) is still unbreakable... simple, honest bakkie with a modern touch.... problem is - people don't seem to be sure whether they want a bakkie or an SUV
Love how that canopy fits in just fine. Fine car, indeed
Great review, I was M on a lot of sites and These started to appear this year, it looks live a great value all-rounder, I would be interested in the auto version. 👍
Thank you very much for this review.
Glad it was helpful!
How much pulling power does one really need and how often will you use that torque.
It was the previous RT D-Max that was badged the Holden/Chev Colorado, not the current shape RG, even though Holden used the 'RG' designation for their RT derivative. Maybe that caused the confusion?
Is it better than a Ford Ranger/VW- Yes. It is better built and far more reliable than these two. Is it better than a HiLux probably not.
it literally isn't, ride quality, tech, power outputs (nm), build quality way down on the Ranger.
but the reliability of the new ranger is shocking@@shaun1900
Your lack of knowledge on the subject is embarrassing, if you cannot afford a vw or ranger stick with the tractor clanging 💩box
@@tyzon00800 Your comment was embarrassing 🤣
@@shaun1900 When the going gets really tough the go to vehicle is not a Ford or VW!!!
I am sure the D Max will be tough and reliable - but having just driven a V-Max, (after a test drive in a new Amarok) it is basic and agricultural. Noisy engine, bouncy ride and feels cheap. Similar to the Hilux in many ways
I have a 1.9 D'max auto which I bought new in 2019. It's been great in the Scottish Highlands and I get 36 mpg which is awesome. My mate has an Amarok and he's getting 18 mpg 😳. If you have an endless wallet go for the Amarok as it is a bit more luxurious but I'm happy with my D'max.
Should have the 3.litre like the Aussie. Like they say. Milk and Orange juice comes in 2 litres
Why doesn't the UK/EU-spec D-Max get the 3.0-litre engine offered in other markets like Australia and New Zealand?
@@joshbacon8241 Because of all the bullshit laws.
Ranger pretender? Class leading, I thought.
1.9 is well underpowered, the gearbox is schizophrenic and the rest of it is just as bad.. bag of sh😀t
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
1.9 ltr not great
2.5l better engine?
The new 1.9 is supposedly better than the 2.5 as I guess it's an all new engine and it has a new gearbox. There's a channel called Lord Muck and he did a review of this truck and he reckoned the new 1.9 is better than the 2.5 and although he never tried the 1.9 id imagine if the 1.9 is better than the 2.5 then it's definitely better than the old 1.9 engine.
Luckily here in Australia we still get the 3.0 4J option. It's not the most 'refined' thing around, but it's a very honest engine.
@@devilsadvocate2548 Here in the UK and Europe, we don't get the 3.0-litre engine, and only the 1.9 is offered - I wonder why? I believe it could be due to emissions?
@@joshbacon8241 yep, it's mostly based on emissions.
Funded by Isuzu 😂😂😂
All the pretend 4wd utes are toys for weekend warriors.....