What is a Recitative? / Leonard Bernstein · Omnibus: "American Musical Comedy"

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 43

  • @classicalmusicanalysis
    @classicalmusicanalysis 9 років тому +28

    Thank you very much for sharing Bernstein's incredible and instructive speeches!

  • @luciagamper6077
    @luciagamper6077 2 роки тому +4

    Genius! I love Bernstein’s explainations on music

  • @peterfeltham5612
    @peterfeltham5612 5 років тому +11

    What a man,explained so all can understand.

  • @CameronBaba
    @CameronBaba 5 років тому +9

    This video makes me so happy

  • @renegademax
    @renegademax 4 роки тому +5

    Absolutely genius. This is has helped me with my new musical. Thank you so much for posting this.

  • @MissBeanieBop
    @MissBeanieBop 3 роки тому +3

    I'm a student of Early Childhood and this explanation of recitative helped greatly! (Currently looking at playing and creating with music and movement) 👍

  • @Livingwater825
    @Livingwater825 3 роки тому +1

    Love it!

  • @ScottAllenFinance
    @ScottAllenFinance Рік тому

    2:05 NOBODY ELSE NOTICED THE TRISTAN CHORD? ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT!!!

  • @theogoldberg8919
    @theogoldberg8919 Рік тому

    MAESTRO DELLE MAESTRI . Thanks for sharing

  • @causasui8185
    @causasui8185 6 років тому +1

    Beautifully done!

  • @adrianoseresi3525
    @adrianoseresi3525 4 роки тому +3

    This is hilarious. I love this!

  • @Twentythousandlps
    @Twentythousandlps Рік тому

    When Bernstein starts singing on his educational shows, he's having fun and so are we. It's what's called in the trade "comic relief."

  • @jmonsegue
    @jmonsegue 8 років тому +5

    Brilliant!!!!

  • @jamessheridan4306
    @jamessheridan4306 Рік тому

    Saw this entire program at the Museum of Broadcasting in NYC way back in the 80's. Why can't we see the whole thing here on UA-cam?

  • @Satellite_Of_Love
    @Satellite_Of_Love 3 роки тому +11

    I came here for the music lesson, and stayed for the chicken.

    • @sarahjones5217
      @sarahjones5217 3 роки тому +2

      Mr Dalliard Nicely put,very nicely put!.

  • @k525rebcsi
    @k525rebcsi 6 років тому +16

    "il prezzo di pollo"

  • @interruptuscontranatura1219
    @interruptuscontranatura1219 6 років тому +2

    Susanna... Gilda... I see what you did there! XDD

  •  Рік тому

    Does anyone know what year this video was recorded?

    • @LeonardBernsteinOfficial
      @LeonardBernsteinOfficial  Рік тому +1

      Broadcast Live on ABC Television Network, October 7, 1956.

    •  Рік тому

      @@LeonardBernsteinOfficial thanks

  • @PadraigCroke-x2p
    @PadraigCroke-x2p 10 місяців тому

    Well that escalated quickly

  • @junqigao-po8vq
    @junqigao-po8vq Рік тому

    whole?

  • @One-cz4ki
    @One-cz4ki 7 років тому +4

    Except Wagner didn't use recitative.
    #woke

    • @dr.g2628
      @dr.g2628 7 років тому +7

      If he had....that's what it might have sounded like!

    • @frankholstein4499
      @frankholstein4499 7 років тому +3

      "Many of Wagner's operas employ sections which are analogous to accompanied recitative." - Wikipedia from "Recitative".

    • @xbqchm
      @xbqchm 6 років тому +2

      Indeed! He rather used Sprechgesang.

    • @d60944
      @d60944 5 років тому +1

      Most of Rheingold is recitative :P

    • @rossmerchant8435
      @rossmerchant8435 5 років тому +3

      Wagner took after Gluck's suggested operatic reforms, in which he suggested that the line between recitative, aria, declaratory passages, etc. should be blurred. So yes, many passages in Wagner are recitative-esque, but in a way that you couldn't point to them as rote, dry, and inelegant exposition in between two bigger musical moments.

  • @KyossWasHere
    @KyossWasHere 4 роки тому +2

    Pfft my nokia 3310 has better camera quality than this potato
    The person commented got r/woosh

  • @peterwaksman9179
    @peterwaksman9179 4 роки тому

    He misses the point entirely.

    • @neil7137
      @neil7137 4 роки тому

      What do you mean?

    • @sarahjones5217
      @sarahjones5217 3 роки тому

      Peter Waksman Yes What do you mean?are you joking?make a statement like that.. explain.

    • @peterwaksman9179
      @peterwaksman9179 3 роки тому

      @@sarahjones5217 GO read the section on "Tropes of Recitative" in Wikipedia

    • @ScottAllenFinance
      @ScottAllenFinance Рік тому

      @@peterwaksman9179 That section just talks about conventional musical approaches to recitative. The article itself starts out explaining recit in almost the same way that Bernstein does. So, I'm going to have to agree with Sarah's comment above... you MUST be joking, because LB doesn't miss the point at all. In fact, it's a brilliant way to explain the function of recit in the musical telling of a story, the relationship between the music and the vocals, and demonstration of different accompaniment styles. I only wish he had included a Baroque example!
      One liner nonsensical comments like this are almost always made from people who spend their time at the top of Mount Stupid, or just trolls...

    • @peterwaksman9179
      @peterwaksman9179 Рік тому

      @@ScottAllenFinanceTo me, recitative is about musical tropes, not the side effect of getting a lot of story covered in a short while. I don't listen to the words. Please read the Wikipedia section, if you think one-liners are inadequate. I am going to guess that you listen to the words, so they are what make recitative significant to you. Name calling? I am not going to bother.