Film Room: T.Y. Hilton vs Richard Sherman and the Seahawks (NFL Breakdowns Ep 92)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
  • This week's sponsor is giving out a $25 play using promocode "Break25". Follow this link! goo.gl/6tSZpb
    Follow me on Twitter: / samuelrgold
    Donate via Patreon: / samuelrgold
    Donate via PayPal: www.paypal.com...
    Going into the Seattle Seahawks-Indianapolis Colts game last Sunday, I was extremely worried about the defense covering T.Y. Hilton. In their last meeting back in 2013, Hilton burned the Seahawks for 140 yards through the air. To add to that, he led the NFL in receiving yards logging over 1,400 last season. With that in mind, I honestly thought the match-up between him and Richard Sherman was going to be what defined this game. Well in this one, Sherman completely shut Hilton down and held him to zero catches on one target.
    From a scheme standpoint, the Seahawks played a lot of man coverage in this game. On the Colts’ 36 passing snaps, Seattle lined up in man coverage for 21 of those plays. Most of the time it was a version of Cover 1 (Cover 1 Plug, Cover 1 Robber, etc...) but it featured Earl Thomas as the deep free safety over the center of the defense. Underneath him, Seattle played man coverage across the board.
    Overall, Hilton did not have a good game. He was targeted six times in coverage for a total of three catches and 30 receiving yards. When Sherman was not covering him, Shaquill Griffin and Justin Coleman traded assignments based on his alignment. Both played very well with Griffin allowing 11 yards, Coleman allowing 13 yards, and the other 6 yards being attributed to a busted assignment that I discussed in the video.
    The videos are considered to be used under the "Fair Use Doctrine" of United States Copyright Law, Title 17 U.S. Code Sections 107-118. Videos are used for editorial and educational purposes only and I do not claim ownership of any original video content. I don't use said video clips in advertisements, marketing or for direct financial gain. All video content in each clip is considered owned by the individual broadcast companies.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 48