Why Does Earth NOT Have Rings? The Roche Limit Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
  • Go to brilliant.org/ScienceAsylum/ to get a 30-day free trial + the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription.
    We all know Saturn has planetary rings, but other planets have them too. Where they come from? How are gravity and tidal forces involved? What is the Roche limit? Let's find out.
    Nick Lucid - Host, Writer, Editor, Animator
    Nora Bailey - Researcher, Fact Checker
    ________________________________
    VIDEO ANNOTATIONS/CARDS
    Tidal Locking Explained:
    • One Side of the Moon A...
    ________________________________
    SUPPORT THE SCIENCE ASYLUM
    Patreon:
    / scienceasylum
    UA-cam Membership:
    / @scienceasylum
    Advanced Theoretical Physics (Paperback):
    www.lulu.com/shop/nick-lucid/a...
    Advanced Theoretical Physics (eBook):
    gumroad.com/l/ubSc
    Merchandise:
    shop.spreadshirt.com/scienceas...
    ________________________________
    HUGE THANK YOU TO THESE SUPPORTERS
    Asylum Counselors:
    Bosphorus
    Asylum Orderlies:
    Dhruv Singhal, Medec Hurtz
    Einsteinium Crazies:
    Benjamin Sharef, Eoin O'Sullivan, Ilya Yashin, Jonathan Lima, Joseph Salomone, Kevin Flanagan, Sean K, UA-camviewer2014
    Plutonium Crazies:
    Al Davis, Compuart, Ellis Hall, Fabio Manzini, Kevin MacLean, LT Marshall, Rick Myers, Vid Icarus
    Platinum Crazies:
    Christopher Bennett, Christopher Little, Clayton Bruckert, David Johnston, Jonathan Reel, Joshua Gallagher, Marino Hernandez, Mikayla Eckel Cifrese, Mr. Orn Jonasar, Olga ooperman, Thomas V Lohmeier
    ________________________________
    SOURCES
    History:
    www.oxfordreference.com/displ...
    www.britannica.com/science/Ro...
    www2.jpl.nasa.gov/saturn/back...
    www.nasa.gov/multimedia/image...
    Articles and Info:
    www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/...
    solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/813...
    solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/794...
    www.esa.int/Science_Explorati...
    www2.jpl.nasa.gov/saturn/faq....
    www.nasa.gov/audience/forstud...
    www.planetary.org/articles/20...
    www.planetary.org/articles/ho...
    skyandtelescope.org/astronomy...
    Books:
    "An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics," Carroll and Ostlie (2007)
    Scientific Papers:
    doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2...
    doi.org/10.1017/9781316286791...
    doi.org/10.1126/science.abn1234
    doi.org/10.1038/35089010
    doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2010...
    doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(90)...
    articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/p...
    doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5...
    ________________________________
    LINKS TO COMMENTS
    • What Are Particles? Do...
    • What Are Particles? Do...
    ________________________________
    IMAGE/VIDEO CREDITS
    Saturn Edge-On:
    images.nasa.gov/details/PIA01272
    Image of Phobos:
    mars.nasa.gov/resources/6989/...
    Moon Formation Sim:
    www.nasa.gov/feature/ames/lun...
    Comet Lovejoy:
    soho.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots...
    Cassini Simulations:
    solarsystem.nasa.gov/resource...
    Big Bang Simulation:
    svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12656
    Solar System Formation:
    svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10659
    People:
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    ________________________________
    TIME CODES
    00:00 Cold Open
    00:48 History
    02:30 Earth's Moon
    03:00 Mars and Phobos
    03:27 Tidal Forces Explained
    04:13 Why does it break apart?
    05:26 Roche Limit
    06:22 Assumptions
    07:05 Summary
    08:04 What if Earth had rings?
    08:35 Sponsor Message
    09:42 Featured Comment

КОМЕНТАРІ • 527

  • @markmuir7338
    @markmuir7338 Рік тому +158

    This explanation of tidal forces and the Roche limit really rings with me.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +30

      😆

    • @sirmongrel511
      @sirmongrel511 Рік тому +15

      It wasn't too big a stretch to follow along.

    • @Anklejbiter
      @Anklejbiter Рік тому +14

      these puns are really starting to fall apart

    • @crimzenwoffinden9973
      @crimzenwoffinden9973 Рік тому +1

      ​@@ScienceAsylumhey I got a question, if space is expanding then what's it expanding into; what is on the outside of space. If it's nothing but space then shouldn't there be an always has been situation on the size of space? Maybe the expansion is just because matter and things hasn't always been around?

  • @playgroundchooser
    @playgroundchooser Рік тому +40

    Woa.... I'm only 41 years old and we didn't know that Neptune had rings when I was born!! 😲
    It's easy to forget that science is STILL happening!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +19

      Right?! So many things we take for granted now in science are much more recent discoveries than we imagine.

    • @Walthanar
      @Walthanar Рік тому +2

      40 yo here and that was my same exact reaction 😂

  • @A3Kr0n
    @A3Kr0n Рік тому +148

    We have rings of techno rocks orbiting the Earth.

    • @blackmewtwo3569
      @blackmewtwo3569 Рік тому +6

      The satellites?

    • @nugboy420
      @nugboy420 Рік тому +7

      Lol techno rocks. Boom boom boom chicka chicka

    • @Broockle
      @Broockle Рік тому +1

      @@blackmewtwo3569 The moon is a satellite 🤓

    • @lemagicbaguette1917
      @lemagicbaguette1917 Рік тому +6

      @@Broockle did satellite first describe natural bodies or orbiting spacecraft?
      Serious question, btw

    • @Broockle
      @Broockle Рік тому +13

      @@lemagicbaguette1917
      Just anything in Orbit.
      A falling rock is a satellite until it hits the floor 😆

  • @Mysoi123
    @Mysoi123 Рік тому +16

    That beginning Big Bang joke never gets old! 😂

  • @msachin4885
    @msachin4885 Рік тому +59

    I'd be cool if you made a video on Saturn's moons. The closer you stare, the more physics you find behind the cosmic beauty

  • @diegofernandez4789
    @diegofernandez4789 Рік тому +89

    We were missing you Nick. Please keep uploading great videos as this one.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +39

      We've come up with a plan for the second half of the year that should allow for more videos than usual.

    • @iamjimgroth
      @iamjimgroth Рік тому +15

      ​@@ScienceAsylum Quality before quantity. That's what I'd prefer anyway. 😅

    • @ChinnuWoW
      @ChinnuWoW Рік тому +3

      @@iamjimgroth They always are and will be of great quality.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +12

      @@iamjimgroth Don't worry. I'm not saying I'm going to start putting out crap or anything. It's just that not all topics _require_ the same amount of effort or time. I'm trying to be better at knowing when to stop "perfecting" a video (because, at some point, there are diminishing returns and I'm wasting time/effort).

    • @iamjimgroth
      @iamjimgroth Рік тому +2

      @@ScienceAsylum it can even be negative returns if you don't know when to stop.
      Btw, that rock on the surface analogy was awesome. I've always had a hard time explaining tidal forces, but now I think I can. 😁

  • @KnowBuddiesLP
    @KnowBuddiesLP Рік тому +13

    I come for the science! I stay for the humor! Actually chuckled when voyager flew by and the "wheeeeeee!". Keep it up and look forward to another 10 years!

  • @paradox7358
    @paradox7358 Рік тому +15

    Can you imagine the night sky with rings?
    Not like I could see it anyway with all the light pollution.
    I'm lucky if I see a star!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +9

      If you can see the Moon, then you could see the rings. During the day, even!

    • @whoeveriam0iam14222
      @whoeveriam0iam14222 Рік тому +1

      can you imagine space travel with bands of debris around the equator

    • @davidvavra9113
      @davidvavra9113 Рік тому +2

      I live under the clouds west of Seattle, the stars are a myth

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому

      @@davidvavra9113 😆

  • @feynstein1004
    @feynstein1004 Рік тому +9

    The molecular forces part blew my mind. I was about to ask just that. Thank you for giving us the complete picture, Nick 😊

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +3

      Yeah, I was reading about it and was, like, "Wait, what?! Weird."

    • @feynstein1004
      @feynstein1004 Рік тому +1

      @@ScienceAsylum Btw I just realized. Tidal forces can also be thought of as a tug of war between the gravity of the planet and the gravity of the satellite. Wait, I'm pretty sure you said something similar in your video on Lagrange points. An object halfway (gravitationally) between the moon and the earth would be equally pulled in both directions and thus remain motionless. It's the same pattern. Except that the object is well, the part of the moon closest to the planet. It's being pulled in two opposite directions: upward toward the planet and downward toward the moon.
      I was wondering about this apparent contradiction regarding how gravity can tear things apart when it's only attractive. Turns out, when you have different centers of gravity (pun intended), you can get ripped apart if you get caught in the middle.
      This also explains why once the moon disintegrates into rings, it becomes stable. The orbiting particles no longer have self-gravity and thus there is nothing to oppose the gravitational pull of the planet.
      Hmm but wait. If self-gravity is the cause of tidal force, then how can people get spaghettified near black holes? People aren't held together by their own gravity 🤔

  • @scottperry9581
    @scottperry9581 Рік тому +6

    An electron is speeding down the highway and gets stopped by a traffic cop.
    "Do you know how fast you were going?" asked the cop.
    "I have no idea." replied the electron.
    "You were going 98 miles per hour." said the cop.
    "Great! Now I am lost!" complained the elctron.

  • @Yezpahr
    @Yezpahr Рік тому +1

    3:14 LOL... It took me about 10 seconds before I understood all the layers of that statement.

  • @odysseus9672
    @odysseus9672 Рік тому +7

    Fantastic video. I had only ever heard of the rigid Roche limit before, so it was really interesting to hear about the elastic limit.

  • @n4whhdb
    @n4whhdb 5 місяців тому +1

    I'm watching this for the second time. Love the use of the timeline. Great content!

  • @KevinCombs1980
    @KevinCombs1980 Рік тому +2

    Always a highlight of the day when there's a new science asylum video! Thank you for what you do sir!

  • @gabrielgoldwoulfe2277
    @gabrielgoldwoulfe2277 Рік тому +1

    Majora's Mask lol Creepy AF got me! Also Enceladus feeds Saturns rings with water/ice eruptions constantly.

  • @tobiasengel8385
    @tobiasengel8385 Місяць тому +1

    You sir are amazing, kid-friendly, immersive content, and highly educational. Thank you! I'm now subscribed

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Місяць тому

      I'm glad you found the channel! Welcome 🤓

  • @Benson_aka_devils_advocate_88
    @Benson_aka_devils_advocate_88 Рік тому +5

    Makes you wonder if our moon had a major impact that makes a temporary ring structure, which in turn would block a ton of sunlight, plunging us into an ice age...

    • @cyrilio
      @cyrilio Рік тому +4

      This might explain the ‘great dying’. Besides a gamma ray burst I don’t think there are any good hypotheses for the cause.

    • @Benson_aka_devils_advocate_88
      @Benson_aka_devils_advocate_88 Рік тому +1

      @@cyrilio I would think there may be traces of it in the geologic record. But has anyone taken a look? That's what popped into my mind.

    • @xx_redwood_xx9737
      @xx_redwood_xx9737 Рік тому

      Lunar rings wouldn't block out the Sun any more than the Moon already does (barring eclipses), unless they were absurdly huge.

  • @TheOblomoff
    @TheOblomoff Рік тому +1

    I only knew planetary rings existed, not their nature. Turns out the explanation is surprisingly simple.
    And yes, it would be; the distances aren't cosmology-big. :)

  • @shifterzx
    @shifterzx 5 місяців тому +2

    This is an epic video that is sadly underrated. I watched again and just got my 10 year old to watch. He's also a fan of yours. You're the best teacher

  • @harthur2010
    @harthur2010 Рік тому +2

    Great video. I didn’t know before that Saturn’s rings will disappear one day. Love the videos with the time line. Also quite liked the voyager sound effect 😊

  • @rayoflight62
    @rayoflight62 Рік тому +2

    Very good explanation of planetary rings, satellites, and the working of the Roche limit.
    The details of Saturn Ring gatekeepers is an important detail added to the lecture.
    Thanks,
    Anthony

  • @iammrbeat
    @iammrbeat Рік тому +3

    This video rings so true. Maybe if Mars finally proposed to Earth it'd finally have a ring.

  • @Eoraph
    @Eoraph Рік тому +4

    so basically, the moon gets spaghettified and this is the same process that makes accretion disks out of stars around black Holes.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +5

      Yep. The black hole version is just more extreme.

  • @artificercreator
    @artificercreator Рік тому +2

    The roche limit! It sounds cool!

  • @RikR1958
    @RikR1958 Рік тому +1

    as always, brilliant educational video!

  • @rythenx
    @rythenx 5 місяців тому +2

    I missed this video when it got uploaded but just heard you mention it in your recent video about UA-cam changes so I went back to watch it and I agree, this video is great. I hope you will be able to stay motivated (both financially and personally) to keep making videos like this one, especially cause you said you enjoyed making this one in particular.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 місяців тому

      Thanks for the confirmation 🤓

  • @maxisalamone
    @maxisalamone Рік тому +2

    I love this channel, keep up the good work Nick!

  •  Рік тому +1

    I love Your channel, mate!

  • @LendriMujina
    @LendriMujina Рік тому +1

    I like the story about how Galileo tried to communicate his discovery of Saturn's rings to Kepler through a coded message, only for Kepler to get it wrong and mistakenly read it as his discovering Mars having two moons.

  • @LuneLovehearn
    @LuneLovehearn Рік тому +15

    Hey Nick. What if you consider a system where a planet like earth has rings but has moons that keep it in check like Saturn. That would be a cool follow up video topic.
    Also the rings could be pale compared to Saturn unless the rings are formed from a material similar to the moon soil.

    • @Broockle
      @Broockle Рік тому +2

      I think a better question to address this curiosity would be; what if Saturn and all it's orbital objects (moons and rings) were scaled down to earth's size.
      Would the orbits still function the same?
      I would think the rings would be much shorter lived in that case.

    • @kingmasterlord
      @kingmasterlord Рік тому

      so we start capturing near-earth asteroids, mine the metals out, and put the rest in the LaGrange points and _make_ some

  • @peterp-a-n4743
    @peterp-a-n4743 Рік тому +2

    super interesting! great explanations!

  • @alhypo
    @alhypo Рік тому +6

    Someday soon we might have artificial rings around Earth... once a few satellites collide and their debris start a chain reaction. 😨

  • @anoimo9013
    @anoimo9013 Рік тому +1

    Amazing video. 6:20 deformation also affects selfgravty forces seen form the surface

  • @Poor.and.Bruised.of.Spirit
    @Poor.and.Bruised.of.Spirit 9 місяців тому +1

    Your channel is reminiscent of me watching Bill Nye The Science Guy as a youth. Though I appreciate your videos much more. Thank you for taking complex subjects and making them understandable for us simpletons.

  • @_folinks
    @_folinks 5 місяців тому

    Loved the majora's mask reference there, keep up the good work

  • @MultiDudeman
    @MultiDudeman 4 місяці тому +2

    Love the majors mask reference! 😄 great video 👍

  • @surfeyes
    @surfeyes Рік тому +3

    Your vids are wicked awesome! 😅

  • @MidnighterClub
    @MidnighterClub Рік тому +1

    Cool explanation of Roche limit!

  • @guyxmas7519
    @guyxmas7519 Рік тому +1

    Such awesomeness in this video!

  • @petersage5157
    @petersage5157 Рік тому +6

    Nick: "I'm going to exaggerate sizes...which is something I've never, ever done before."
    Emily: ...

  • @agargamer6759
    @agargamer6759 Рік тому +1

    Nice video, I didn't know that Galileo had such a crude picture of the rings with his telescope

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +1

      Yep! I felt like that was an important historical detail. By giving all the credit to Galileo, we miss out on how knowledge is gained _incrementally._

  • @CT-pi2gl
    @CT-pi2gl Рік тому +2

    I think it's cool how you use the comic sans or similarly loose font for the mathematical expressions. It makes it more approachable, and like someone just scrawled it down in the middle of doing an experiment.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому

      I _really_ like the math font I use, but it drives some people crazy. Apparently, people have different preferences. Who knew? 😉

  • @AloisMahdal
    @AloisMahdal Рік тому +1

    The 10:00 length of this video made me feel nostalgia

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому

      I didn't do it on purpose. It just kind of... happened.

  • @KeithCooper-Albuquerque
    @KeithCooper-Albuquerque Рік тому +2

    Excellent video!

  • @fozzsr
    @fozzsr Рік тому +1

    Particularly good yuks this round buddy, nice. 😁👍

  • @nokian9005
    @nokian9005 Рік тому +1

    I have a theory.
    I think UA-cam knows you're one of my favorite creators. That's why it usually waits a day or two to show me your videos when they get posted, because the algorithm is trying to check to see how quickly I find out about your video on my own before recommending it to me. UA-cam uses people like me as guinea pigs to gauge what to do with the metric count.
    But anyways, all theories aside- this is a good upload! I've always been fascinated by rings. I remember being a kid and swearing that I saw a planet with rings in the sky when stargazing once. As an adult I can't make out the rings anymore, but at least I can recognize Saturn and Jupiter sometimes. ☺️

  • @JohnDoe-lt4kl
    @JohnDoe-lt4kl Рік тому +4

    It's OK to exaggerate sizes for clarity, as long as this does not come across as a stretch. And, by the way, Earth used to have rings (and hobbits)...

  • @arbodox
    @arbodox Рік тому +5

    As usual, awesome video with your clear explanations! What do you think is going on with Quaoar's recently-discovered rings, which orbit outside of its Roche limit?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +6

      There could be several reasons. Most of Saturn's rings are outside their Roche limit, but Saturn has those Shepherd moons to help keep things in place. Also, collisions can cause rings. It doesn't have be tidal disruption (like with Phobos). So it's possible a couple large rocks collided near Quaoar and we just happened to catch the rings while they're still there.

  • @pixelpatter01
    @pixelpatter01 Рік тому +3

    The downside of rings around Earth would be the reflected light providing extra heating on some portions of the globe and shadows on other portions. It would sure complicate our seasons or at least accentuate them. I'd love to hear you discuss that situation.

    • @qevvy
      @qevvy Рік тому +4

      While I'm not a big fan of geoengineering solutions to global warming, I'd totally get behind an artificial Earth ring system as a sun shade just for the spectacle of the thing. 😄

  • @ZohaibKhan-mr7uy
    @ZohaibKhan-mr7uy Рік тому +1

    Please do a video on the spin of particles why fermions have 1/2h spin and boson have 0 or 1,2h etc. Your explanation is phenomenal. Thanks

  • @williamschrom1584
    @williamschrom1584 Рік тому +2

    Appreciate the humor... keep it up

  • @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
    @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Рік тому +2

    Very entertaining video - as usual. ... You're dancing _rings_ around the other channels!

  • @suranjanroy7528
    @suranjanroy7528 Рік тому +2

    Loved it.

  • @JanStrojil
    @JanStrojil Рік тому +1

    Coming back to rewatch, like and comment. Let’s boost the algorithm.

  • @sol_mental
    @sol_mental Рік тому +1

    So. Cool. This is awesome and I do want to one day visit Saturn's rings

  • @jamesdriscoll_tmp1515
    @jamesdriscoll_tmp1515 Рік тому +1

    Orbital resonance is another cool phenomena.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому

      True! But I don't think any video I make about it would be better than Steve Mould's video: ua-cam.com/video/Qyn64b4LNJ0/v-deo.html

  • @josmeproslonije724
    @josmeproslonije724 Рік тому +1

    Liked the video just cause of the Majora's Mask reference! 10/10

  • @alexvilonyay8597
    @alexvilonyay8597 Рік тому

    Great video as always! I'm curious if that limit would exist for a star? Crazy for life!

    • @KohuGaly
      @KohuGaly Рік тому +1

      Yes, it is even mentioned in the video when he mentions the comet.

  • @Castellano365
    @Castellano365 Рік тому +2

    Is that one of Nicole's @SoundoftheForest "It's a fancy bag" shirts?👀

  • @GMPranav
    @GMPranav Рік тому +1

    It feels like rings would be more interesting, but honestly if we got used to seeing rings, we would complain we dont have a moon while pther planets do.

    • @KohuGaly
      @KohuGaly Рік тому

      One interesting fact about rings is that if earth had them, it would be plainly obvious by the naked eye that earth is a sphere. You could literally see its round shadow on the rings at night.

  • @horizonbrave1533
    @horizonbrave1533 Рік тому +4

    LOl I never exaggerate size for clarity... haha, the stuff you slide in to these talks is scandalous nick! 😂😂

  • @Casa-de-hongos
    @Casa-de-hongos 5 місяців тому +1

    Only found out about this video, because of the rant in the other one. Even though I watched all your videos for years, youtube really thought this one won't be my taste.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 місяців тому

      The algorithm doesn't always make the best choices... at least not what's best for either of us anyway.

  • @jamesdriscoll_tmp1515
    @jamesdriscoll_tmp1515 Рік тому +1

    A Hill sphere talk would be a cool topic, maybe part of a basic orbital mechanics series.
    Do you play KSP?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому

      I considered making Hill spheres a side note in this video, but decided it should be its own video. (No, I've never used KSP.)

  • @Douglas_Blake_579
    @Douglas_Blake_579 Рік тому +1

    Where are Earth's rings? We're building them now with all the stuff we've put into low Earch Orbit.

  • @kevingalls
    @kevingalls Місяць тому +1

    Loved this and it’s a good explanation, but didn’t get into what happens if the body passes quickly through the Roche limit such as an asteroid with an orbital trajectory intercepting Earth. In this scenario it may not break up, and even if it slightly disintegrated, all of the mass would still smash into Earth. As another example, let’s say a huge asteroid collided with the moon with enough force and the perfect angle so as to stop the moon from orbiting Earth. So if the moon was stationary with respect to Earth and started falling into the gravity well of Earth, would it break up? I mean, it wouldn’t matter because we’d still die but I do wonder… 🤔

  • @OrdenJust
    @OrdenJust Рік тому +1

    Excellent pronunciation of "Huygens"! I've been saying it wrong lo these many years.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +1

      Thanks! Someone corrected me on it years ago and I've said it this way ever since.

  • @AlexandarHullRichter
    @AlexandarHullRichter Рік тому +1

    I think people picture moons as being solid chunks of rock that you could throw at something and have them not break apart, like a small piece of granite.
    It's much more realistic to see moons as collections of small rocks and dirt that are only held together in the first place by self-gravity.
    After all, that's what the surface of the Earth is in most places. There's nothing keeping dirt, sand, hills, mountains, oceans, etc. on the ground, except that they're heavy and the Earth has self-gravity.

  • @GlenHunt
    @GlenHunt Рік тому +2

    Did I click like before watching, or did I watch it backwards and then click like? Which way did t go??
    Also, "to the timeline!!"

  • @Chad_Thundercock
    @Chad_Thundercock Рік тому +2

    They say if you cut a planet in half and count the rings, you can tell how old it is.

  • @UtraVioletDreams
    @UtraVioletDreams Рік тому +1

    0:19 Well if we continue to dump lots of debris in space, we will get our ring eventually.

  • @BrycetheyoungAstronomer
    @BrycetheyoungAstronomer 5 місяців тому

    I agreed with you I love Saturn too. Saturn is not only planet in the solar system has rings, but Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune does has rings too.
    I do love space a lot. It part of my dream come true.
    I also love Jupiter also. Jupiter is the king of planets.

  • @paulozhang1340
    @paulozhang1340 Рік тому +1

    The crazy guy on the left side is more genuine to me 😂

  • @ricojes
    @ricojes Рік тому +1

    How it started: trying to turn space junk into earth's rings
    How it's going: Kessler syndrome

  • @alexcunhapinto
    @alexcunhapinto Рік тому +1

    I just can't stop loving you.

  • @stevengeorges9046
    @stevengeorges9046 Рік тому +1

    Can you imagine how hard it would be to have stable orbiting satellites if we had rings around earth?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +1

      Ok, so maybe there would be practical problems.

  • @dblaze23
    @dblaze23 Рік тому +3

    5:19 why does that rock starts revolving around planet instead of falling straight (directly) into it

    • @nerobernardino88
      @nerobernardino88 Рік тому +1

      Because it was already revolving around the planet, the moon is already revolving around the planet.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +4

      Technically, it takes 10s of millions of years. Think of it like a time lapse: one picture every time the moon gets back to that spot in its orbit.

  • @misterlau5246
    @misterlau5246 Рік тому +1

    Doctor Lucid! Long time no see!
    Before I watch your video..
    No rings here, just you wait till we get enough basura espacial allá arriba

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +1

      I took a little vacation after my live stream last month. Should be back in action now though.

  • @XtReMz98
    @XtReMz98 Рік тому +2

    Earth knows how valuable she is. She's waiting for the perfect gentleman that will put a ring on her.

  • @bobthetrashcollector
    @bobthetrashcollector Рік тому

    I feel like Cody's lab is playing in the next room the entire time

  • @n4whhdb
    @n4whhdb Рік тому +1

    Exaggerating sizes for clarity sometimes leads to scale envy. 😅

  • @aaronsj80
    @aaronsj80 Рік тому +20

    Wouldn't having rings make launching satellites more difficult?

    • @josebarria3233
      @josebarria3233 Рік тому +2

      Yeah pretty much

    • @sskpsp
      @sskpsp Рік тому +1

      I imagine you can go around them

    • @UrsusSuperior44
      @UrsusSuperior44 Рік тому +2

      @@sskpsp still, quite likely, considerably more difficult, maybe even to the point of such lack of viability/process being so resource straining, that GPS could still remain a military-only system or the luxury of the wealthiest due to sheer cost of placing the satellite in proper location and on proper course, due to:
      - need of "detour" ("from the path we could take if the rings were not an issue")/less favorable and more elaborate to reach and maintain final position
      - upkeep
      - necessity of considerably more durable construction
      - and simply calculating into the price of the current launch at least a partial cost of inevitable (likely quick to come) future replacement, because things really, truly need to be AT LEAST cost effective, preferably profitable
      As usual, things are all fine and dandy until potentially mundane consequences receive more than a split second of an afterthought.
      "So cool we have those rings that are actually pretty great to gaze upon every night, truly a marvel.
      Oh, look, another of our satellite missions literally went down in flames just now. A thirtieth this decade, good we're doing it all unmanned for quite some time.
      A shooting star, make a wish!
      Ahhhhhh....
      Nice."

    • @UrsusSuperior44
      @UrsusSuperior44 Рік тому +6

      Also, imagine the utterly unfathomable - in potential span and chaos - clusterf- of ancient mythology.
      The Sun, Moon and "Seven Stars" (or however many was in which mythical 'consciousness' at which point in time) is quite manageable (in and even without comparison) and likely less terror inducing than uncountable swarm of nearby space rocks.
      Quite entertaining to think how the ancients would have handled this, but I suspect that what actually happened is a more preferable scenario in this aspect as well.

    • @user-sl6gn1ss8p
      @user-sl6gn1ss8p Рік тому +6

      @@UrsusSuperior44 they might see it more as a veil or sky-river or something?

  • @oddlyspecificmath
    @oddlyspecificmath Рік тому +1

    No rings? Wellll, we _are_ kinda working on a little Glitter Band* with our satellites... (Book nerd points for anyone who gets that reference)
    * Nope, _not_ the rock group

  • @jeremycraft8452
    @jeremycraft8452 Рік тому +1

    3:17 Nick challenges M for the title of Awkward.

  • @Muladeseis
    @Muladeseis Рік тому

    This made me remember one of your videos called "One Side of the Moon ALWAYS Faces Us. Why is that? | Tidal Locking". I made there a question, if that tidal locking has any relationship with the Moon moving away from the Earth? I hope you could help me answering that, thank you!

    • @KohuGaly
      @KohuGaly Рік тому +2

      Yes it does. The process of tidal locking transfers energy from rotation of the body to the orbital energy. Basically, the tides caused by the moon deform the shape of the earth. As the earth rotates, the deformations "drag" the moon gravitationally. This causes the moon to gain orbital angular momentum and earth loose rotational angular momentum.
      For moon, this process is already finished (it's tidally locked). For earth the process is still happening.

    • @jamesmnguyen
      @jamesmnguyen Рік тому

      And since the Earth spins faster than the Moon's orbit, energy is transferred to the Moon causing its orbit to increase in energy (go higher in orbit). Eventually the Moon and the Earth will rotate at the same rate (freezing the moon in the sky). Although this will take longer than the age of our Sun so don't get excited.

    • @Muladeseis
      @Muladeseis Рік тому

      @@KohuGaly wow, very interesting, thanks for your answer! And I hope that we have ever a video on that topic here in the channel.

  • @laz7354
    @laz7354 Місяць тому +1

    👍 for the Majora's Mask reference! 🌚

  • @on1yadam
    @on1yadam Рік тому +1

    3:18 yep, that's what she said lol

  • @Ryan-lk4pu
    @Ryan-lk4pu Рік тому +1

    Ever since I was a child I have dreamt of sitting on a planet that has rings, or better still, the moon of a gas giant that had rings.
    Imagine those views looking up...

    • @Ryan-lk4pu
      @Ryan-lk4pu Рік тому

      It's why I play a lot of space games.

    • @smeeself
      @smeeself Рік тому

      ​@Ryan Games are better than most of Saturn's moons, as they are on the same plane as the rings, the rings would be very difficult to see.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +1

      Yeah, living on the moon of a gas giant with rings would be so cool!!

  • @billyyank2198
    @billyyank2198 Рік тому

    The story of how the rings of Uranus were discovered is quite fascinating.

  • @skoggiehoggins1445
    @skoggiehoggins1445 Рік тому +1

    I'VE MISSED YOU. sorry to be gone so long

  • @Lucky-df8uz
    @Lucky-df8uz Рік тому +2

    This video was brilliant, pun intended.

  • @mrdraw2087
    @mrdraw2087 Рік тому +2

    What makes the rings decay? The collisions between the particles?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +6

      A planetary ring is a "many-body problem." Those are notoriously unstable because everything is tugging on everything else.

  • @kiedto
    @kiedto Рік тому

    Roche limit gives me the sensation it's a bit like the event horizon of black holes. Any object passing that limit will start spaghettification and will just snap.

    • @cortster12
      @cortster12 Рік тому

      The event horizon of a black hole isn't like a roche limit, since spaghettification happens well before the event horizon of a black hole.

    • @caterscarrots3407
      @caterscarrots3407 7 місяців тому

      @@cortster12 Yeah, if you're comparing the Roche limit to black holes, then it's more analogous to the ISCO(Innermost Stable Circular Orbit) of a black hole, right? And that's far out from the event horizon(which is more analogous to the planet surface)

  • @deeprecce9852
    @deeprecce9852 Рік тому +2

    We are creating so much space debris, who knows we may hv a visible ring someday!

  • @kingplunger6033
    @kingplunger6033 Рік тому +1

    Interesting :)

  • @WarrenGarabrandt
    @WarrenGarabrandt 8 місяців тому +1

    The Earth... /kinda/ has rings. We're putting them up there, and they are in multiple planes, but they exist, and more and more are showing up every year.

  • @KekusMagnus
    @KekusMagnus Рік тому

    given how old planets are and how short-lived rings are, it's not easy to imagine Jupiter at some point in time having massive rings, much bigger than Jupiter. Now that would be cool

  • @harrisonbraun4499
    @harrisonbraun4499 Рік тому +1

    Yes! More space!

  • @jpendersen1294
    @jpendersen1294 Рік тому +1

    Don't worry, we're working to correct this, with all the space debris.

  • @jednye3348
    @jednye3348 Рік тому

    It would be cool to see if we made our own rings for storage of resources like water and minerals for space based production and also for the beautiful night sky's we would see here on earth

  • @Dodoskee
    @Dodoskee 11 місяців тому +1

    Great explanation as usual! ❤