I need Lewin to come around with me in life and advocate for me at all times in all situations, DO YOU AGREE??? This lady makes me feel insane. I wonder how much she’s getting paid to attempt to wrongly manipulate the outcome.
Yeah. Some defendants don't deserve best possible defense. It's immoral to point out weakness in prosecutor work when somebody is accused of heinous crime. Sure. This argument is well known tool of totalitarian regimes. If enough people believes that, accusation alone is enough to sentence somebody. It's well known tactic of inquisition when accusation of being witch was enough to sentence somebody. I despise that way of thinking. Everybody deserve best possible defense, even sometimes guilty person can get away with crime. This lawyer suggestions about that are at least questionable and should be asked about that.
Lewin absolutely annihilated the credibility of this defence witness’ before he even got to the questions relevant to Durst’s case. How can anybody watch this cross & not think she’s as vile and horrible a person as the defendant himself.
She is such an unprofessional and hostile witness. She keeps looking at the jury to obtain sympathy or something. This prosecutor did his research and taking her down!
Imagine making $270,000 a year teaching and still CHOOSING to work for rich sexual predators? Her family and friends must be so proud of this awful person who uses her intellect to defend these scumbags. This prosecutor is so skillful at exposing this charlatan 👏
This "prosecutor " Is one of the most successful COLD CASE bringer of justice to families that have been left for years with none for their murdered loved ones Google his cases Mr Lewellen
Except if you actually listened to her you would know that she doesn't claim that anyone's memory is perfect, including her own! Didi you listen? Obviously not. Her whole thing is about how memory is imperfect, maleable, and subject to change by mere suggestion. But I don't expect most of you to have the intelligence to actually LISTEN to the expert witnesses, especially when they are called by the defense. Your mother should be ashamed at the kid she raised.
She keeps looking at the Jury and smiling like they are her friends, I can't imagine that they are smiling back at her. She is arrogant and unlikeable imo.
GEEZ...consulted or testified for the defense of Bundy, Hilltop Strangler, OJ Simpson, Timothy McVey, Menendez Brothers, Michael Jackson, Phil Spector, Martha Stewart, Jerry Sandusky, Bill Cosby, and Harvey Weinstein. Wow. How can she sleep at night?
This is so ridiculous. They are going around in circles. If I was on the jury, I would be so frustrated and annoyed about the stupidity of this interaction. What has this got to do with the Susan Berman murder?
Lord help society if you’re ever selected for jury duty and can’t understand how the motive & credibility of an “expert witness” testimony isn’t relevant in a MURDER case!
Does she have dementia? Or just trying to be difficult? This is hard to watch. She should retire. Kudos to the prosecutor. Surprised the judge didn't have a word with her.
In the live right now Lewin is still going at her. To those who have followed this trial throughout, Is she that critical a defense witness? I wonder if it's the toughest cross exam she's ever faced.
I looked her up. She has been a controversial expert witness for some of the worst scoundrels. If Epstein had not offed himself, his team would have lined her up. Bet she'll testify for Ghislaine Maxwell. Time to start preparing my snacks for tomorrow!
Would think due to the age of the case (how long ago it happened) and all the witnesses that are elderly, the topic of "memory" would be critical to the Jury in my opinion. However, EVEN before the Prosecutor effectively dismantled her testimony and credibility, I would think the issue of "Memory" would also be counterproductive for Durst and his "memory" issues (not being truthful over the course of several years then all of a sudden state, for the purposes of his trial, that something he DENIED AS HIM BEING RESPONSIBLE for ever since the crime has been committed about 20+ years ago, he had ACTUALLY, IN FACT, committed)!!! Will be VERY interesting, in my opinion, how the Prosecutor addresses this fact(s) etc .... Hope this makes sense.
She isn't representing anyone. She's giving her expert opinion about how memory works and can be altered, and she is answering hypothetical questions based upon the current state of memory research. Nothing she said was surprising or inaccurate. The defense is entitled to question whether various witnesses' reports of what they remembered (which changed over time, after all), were accurate. Such evidence might come up in any trial.
She is just their to comment on memory and how it works. The innocence projects has freed hundreds of people that were wrongly convicted based on false/inaccurate memories often elicited by the police or prosecutor. She isnt even their to comment on Durst at all. She basically gave her Ted Talk.
@@suzanneschmidt3755 still if she is hired by the defense and was willing to work for some of the nastiest people then I still wonder how she sleeps night. She herself said she has fancied some feathers because she was the only one willing to do it........ have a goodnight! 😴
@@brianacazares5024 trust me, as a person, I think she is repulsive. But memory science is useful when it comes to the wrongly accused. Think about how similar people look in reality, especially trying to relate a face youve never seen before. I struggled to give an accurate account to a police sketch artist. No matter what it wasn’t right. Try thinking about describing a loved one to a sketch artist, uts actually hard. So when you are shown a picture that gets it mostly right, a lot of people go with it, especially if they are told its correct by police.
She didn’t lie about anything, she never even commented on this case. She is responding to non-stop hypotheticals from the prosecution. So far he hasn’t even asked her about the case. She was there just to testify on how memory works. She basically gave her Ted talk.
@@suzanneschmidt3755 She has been lying her a$$ off and the prosecutor is spending so much time establishing this foundation prior to asking questions about this case because she has admitted to the court before that she’s unethical, an unreliable witness & a liar. In her own words “A witness for the defence”. When Lewin gets to the questions about this case it literally doesn’t matter how she responds to them her credibility has been destroyed. If you can’t believe her answers to the most basic of Lewin’s questions (like would you take a case where a family member is a victim?) how the eff do you believe the difficult ones involving memory
I LOVE THIS PROSECUTOR. HE IS DOING A FANTASTIC JOB. SHE IS A PATHETIC WITNESS FOR THE DEFENSE OF AND OBVIOUS MURDERER. HE IS GUILTY FOR SURE IN MY OPINION.
Did you happen to notice she never commented on the Durst case? She was a professor that was asked to testify about how memory works and was railroaded by nonstop hypotheticals. In science you always use qualifiers because science evolves.
This Judge is the WORST!!!! He is so unprofessional and if he THINKS he is effective, he really needs to review proceedings that are on UA-cam. Wonder if there are ratings for Judges.
If she would answer his simple questions without all the deceit it wouldn’t appear that he is a bully. This cross is so uncomfortable to watch because this witness is a manipulative, lying, unethical & biased “expert witness” who has stated she would consider violating the ethical standards of her profession in testimony
How has Mr. Lewin not been found in contempt ? Way to highstrung. His team needs to replace him when it comes to the cross examination of Robert Durst. He's going to lose the jury an the case if he can't settle down. Put someone else from his team in before it's too late !!!!
![Jodi Arias Testifies [PT 1] | Court TV Trial Archive](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vyGWCx0-rFM/mqdefault.jpg)
Practice what you preach my dear! Prosecutor you rock! IMO expert has been totally discredited as an expert.
Bravo to prosecutor for this cross - excellent job!!!!!
Bravo to hee for outdoing this AH!
I need Lewin to come around with me in life and advocate for me at all times in all situations, DO YOU AGREE??? This lady makes me feel insane. I wonder how much she’s getting paid to attempt to wrongly manipulate the outcome.
Wow that lawyer ripped her a new one. Just naming the previous scumbags she's worked says everything you need to know about her.
I LOVE DA Lewellen
What company she keeps!
Yeah. Some defendants don't deserve best possible defense. It's immoral to point out weakness in prosecutor work when somebody is accused of heinous crime.
Sure.
This argument is well known tool of totalitarian regimes.
If enough people believes that, accusation alone is enough to sentence somebody. It's well known tactic of inquisition when accusation of being witch was enough to sentence somebody.
I despise that way of thinking.
Everybody deserve best possible defense, even sometimes guilty person can get away with crime.
This lawyer suggestions about that are at least questionable and should be asked about that.
Lewin absolutely annihilated the credibility of this defence witness’ before he even got to the questions relevant to Durst’s case. How can anybody watch this cross & not think she’s as vile and horrible a person as the defendant himself.
She is such an unprofessional and hostile witness. She keeps looking at the jury to obtain sympathy or something. This prosecutor did his research and taking her down!
She appears to think the jury are on her side. I don’t believe she is correct 😜
Imagine making $270,000 a year teaching and still CHOOSING to work for rich sexual predators? Her family and friends must be so proud of this awful person who uses her intellect to defend these scumbags. This prosecutor is so skillful at exposing this charlatan 👏
The prosecutor revealed the depths of this person's motivation. Well done...he did not allow her BS. Great job.
This "prosecutor "
Is one of the most successful
COLD CASE bringer of justice to families that have been left for years with none for their murdered loved ones
Google his cases
Mr Lewellen
Mr Lewellen is one of the most successful COLD CASE TRIAL CONVICTION AND SOLVED
He’s never lost a case yet. Not kidding. He’s never lost a single trial.
Lewin: "Doctor, Is your specialty memory?"
Doctor: "I don't remember". 😳
Except if you actually listened to her you would know that she doesn't claim that anyone's memory is perfect, including her own! Didi you listen? Obviously not. Her whole thing is about how memory is imperfect, maleable, and subject to change by mere suggestion. But I don't expect most of you to have the intelligence to actually LISTEN to the expert witnesses, especially when they are called by the defense. Your mother should be ashamed at the kid she raised.
@@shellos8 It was a joke. 🙄
lol
@@shellos8 I think you may be taking these comments a bit too seriously.
@@shellos8 Seriously, lighten up! The commenter was being silly.
Just came here after the Troconis cross today! This and earliers cross was fantastic
44:51
Jesus, she just admitted to having no ethics or understanding of them in relation to a court case.
...I mean, as if we didn't know I guess.
The lewinator does damage again
The witness wants to charge $600/hr and not be recorded when discussing a court case, with the Defense also on the call.
Yes she isn’t worth 5 cents an hour after this cross.
Also, please address her as “Doctor”. 😉
She keeps looking at the Jury and smiling like they are her friends, I can't imagine that they are smiling back at her. She is arrogant and unlikeable imo.
The sort of person who thinks her farts never smell.
The prosecutors tone speaks arrogance and overly confident and I suspect durst will get a lot more sympathy than Lewin does likability.
Mr.John Lewin is brilliant!
Lmao.. she's a doctor?? An expert in memory?
She probably can't remember what she had for dinner last night. What a joke.
She has an agenda. Tiresome. Her ego makes her look foolish at times. Just answer the question that was asked.
She looks like a cartoon witch
'at times'??? All the time. Lol
@@lovepet4565 that characterization is probably closer to the truth than we will ever know.
GEEZ...consulted or testified for the defense of Bundy, Hilltop Strangler, OJ Simpson, Timothy McVey, Menendez Brothers, Michael Jackson, Phil Spector, Martha Stewart, Jerry Sandusky, Bill Cosby, and Harvey Weinstein. Wow. How can she sleep at night?
Stanford University Alum has shamed herself and her Alma Mater. Lol
This is so ridiculous. They are going around in circles. If I was on the jury, I would be so frustrated and annoyed about the stupidity of this interaction. What has this got to do with the Susan Berman murder?
Lord help society if you’re ever selected for jury duty and can’t understand how the motive & credibility of an “expert witness” testimony isn’t relevant in a MURDER case!
@@kk3940 Lord help society ? Give me a break. I’m a European so I’m just observing your justice system.
Listen, I hate it here but jury trials are one of the few things we got going for us. @@cirilloz
Does she have dementia? Or just trying to be difficult? This is hard to watch. She should retire. Kudos to the prosecutor. Surprised the judge didn't have a word with her.
I would avoid walking past the Law department of U.C.I. for a very long time.
John Lewin, you're a Real American Hero
Her facial expressions are hilarious, lol, she is frightened of John Lewin.
He is the pitbiull we need. He rips her apart.
Why is she smirking?
Think this witness has REALLY BACKFIRED for the Defense in my opinion. Not sure if she can be rehabilitated.
I’m going to just watch this over and over and over
In the live right now Lewin is still going at her. To those who have followed this trial throughout, Is she that critical a defense witness? I wonder if it's the toughest cross exam she's ever faced.
So many of the witnesses for defense have been hostile, and i don't know why he is not bringing this up to the judge??
I looked her up. She has been a controversial expert witness for some of the worst scoundrels. If Epstein had not offed himself, his team would have lined her up. Bet she'll testify for Ghislaine Maxwell. Time to start preparing my snacks for tomorrow!
Would think due to the age of the case (how long ago it happened) and all the witnesses that are elderly, the topic of "memory" would be critical to the Jury in my opinion. However, EVEN before the Prosecutor effectively dismantled her testimony and credibility, I would think the issue of "Memory" would also be counterproductive for Durst and his "memory" issues (not being truthful over the course of several years then all of a sudden state, for the purposes of his trial, that something he DENIED AS HIM BEING RESPONSIBLE for ever since the crime has been committed about 20+ years ago, he had ACTUALLY, IN FACT, committed)!!!
Will be VERY interesting, in my opinion, how the Prosecutor addresses this fact(s) etc ....
Hope this makes sense.
@@marthest-louis7128 hey good call. You should be a psychic Marthe. She is testifying for Ms Maxwell soon.
Your memory's not very good, is it? LOL
She isn't a memory expert but she expert in selective amnesia, lying, and memory lost
28:24 WOW she really tried it, but Lewin remains strong
Omgosh I can't believe this lady would represent these people! How does she live with herself every night!
She isn't representing anyone. She's giving her expert opinion about how memory works and can be altered, and she is answering hypothetical questions based upon the current state of memory research. Nothing she said was surprising or inaccurate. The defense is entitled to question whether various witnesses' reports of what they remembered (which changed over time, after all), were accurate. Such evidence might come up in any trial.
But she still decided that she would work for the defense, which like I said would be for such people......have a good day!
She is just their to comment on memory and how it works. The innocence projects has freed hundreds of people that were wrongly convicted based on false/inaccurate memories often elicited by the police or prosecutor. She isnt even their to comment on Durst at all. She basically gave her Ted Talk.
@@suzanneschmidt3755 still if she is hired by the defense and was willing to work for some of the nastiest people then I still wonder how she sleeps night. She herself said she has fancied some feathers because she was the only one willing to do it........ have a goodnight! 😴
@@brianacazares5024 trust me, as a person, I think she is repulsive. But memory science is useful when it comes to the wrongly accused. Think about how similar people look in reality, especially trying to relate a face youve never seen before. I struggled to give an accurate account to a police sketch artist. No matter what it wasn’t right. Try thinking about describing a loved one to a sketch artist, uts actually hard. So when you are shown a picture that gets it mostly right, a lot of people go with it, especially if they are told its correct by police.
So she lied about something and is trying not to be caught perjuring herself?
She didn’t lie about anything, she never even commented on this case. She is responding to non-stop hypotheticals from the prosecution. So far he hasn’t even asked her about the case. She was there just to testify on how memory works. She basically gave her Ted talk.
Incidentally I hate her as a person, but thats aside from this
@@suzanneschmidt3755 She has been lying her a$$ off and the prosecutor is spending so much time establishing this foundation prior to asking questions about this case because she has admitted to the court before that she’s unethical, an unreliable witness & a liar. In her own words “A witness for the defence”. When Lewin gets to the questions about this case it literally doesn’t matter how she responds to them her credibility has been destroyed.
If you can’t believe her answers to the most basic of Lewin’s questions (like would you take a case where a family member is a victim?) how the eff do you believe the difficult ones involving memory
Wow she’s is a sick human being the more I listen!!!
She has had a major career! Her testimony convinces me!
The judge though... Zorro!
😂
She’s a loon. Quit flattering her by calling her “Doctor.”
I LOVE THIS PROSECUTOR. HE IS DOING A FANTASTIC JOB. SHE IS A PATHETIC WITNESS FOR THE DEFENSE OF AND OBVIOUS MURDERER. HE IS GUILTY FOR SURE IN MY OPINION.
Did you happen to notice she never commented on the Durst case? She was a professor that was asked to testify about how memory works and was railroaded by nonstop hypotheticals. In science you always use qualifiers because science evolves.
OMG is that Garth? I’m expecting her to just say “shwing!!!!”
Memory expert forgets her own job.
Making a big deal about not calling her doctor is how much they know he’s destroying her. Clowns.
HAHAHA love it!!! He is a bully. The best line in this whole trial
23:00 memory not very good for a memory expert
Who is she someone tell me how she is in this I need to know?
She refused Hitler ,,,haha
I was about to
Joke this
But it was TRUE
what DOES she know????? geez HORRIBLE WITNESS/EXPERT AND SHE'S THE ONLY ONE BESIDE DURST FOR THE DEFENSE. SMDH
The judge is not typical, but have no reason to say he is not effective.
22:59 PRICELESS
“Had a chance to meet him” re: Timothy Mcvey
She,s done
This is a joke 🤦♀️ please tell me this is a joke 🤦♀️
Kangaroo Court
None of this has anything to do with Susan Berman.
20:50
This Judge is the WORST!!!! He is so unprofessional and if he THINKS he is effective, he really needs to review proceedings that are on UA-cam. Wonder if there are ratings for Judges.
He is wonderful; so professional, compassionate, and knowledgeable.
Judge is probably getting paid too
She's a joke
6-700$ an hour OMGGGG
Prosecutor is a bully. Glad the witness called him out.
The day before was absolutely appalling and unprofessional. I used to like Lewin but his behavior changed my opinion of him drastically
If she would answer his simple questions without all the deceit it wouldn’t appear that he is a bully.
This cross is so uncomfortable to watch because this witness is a manipulative, lying, unethical & biased “expert witness” who has stated she would consider violating the ethical standards of her profession in testimony
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Mr. Lewin is a bully.. 😁
Who are these people what is this?
This is a dream that the little boy who lives in your mouth is having.
No one remembers
@@hellok7877 😂😂
This prosecutor is a horrible person, rude and disrespectful.
How has Mr. Lewin not been found in contempt ? Way to highstrung. His team needs to replace him when it comes to the cross examination of Robert Durst. He's going to lose the jury an the case if he can't settle down. Put someone else from his team in before it's too late !!!!
You couldn’t be more wrong
The judge it a joke too.
28:38