Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Woke Tiktoker HATES Britain for its colonial past
- Додати в
- Мій плейлист
- Переглянути пізніше
- Поділитися
Поділитися
Вставка
Розмір відео:
- Опубліковано 18 сер 2024
КОМЕНТАРІ • 14 тис.
Наступне
Автоматичне відтворення
The Unmaking of India: How the British Impoverished the World’s Richest CountryOdd Compass
Переглядів 2,8 млн
How hosting 2036 Olympics will ruin India? | Economic Case studyThink School
Переглядів 839 тис.
How did Britain Conquer India? | Animated HistoryThe Armchair Historian
Переглядів 2,5 млн
ЛЕТНИЙ ДЕНЬ ТВОЕГО ДЕТСТВАSIDELNIKOVVV
Переглядів 1,6 млн
МАФИЯ в РЕАЛЬНОЙ ЖИЗНИ: Масленников, Матвиенко, Булкин, Сабина, Бустер, Дилара, Гурам, Леон, ЯнчикДима Масленников
Переглядів 7 млн
⚡️ "Пятки сверкали" аж до КУРСКА! "Кадыровцы" БЕЖАЛИ, оголив фронт!FREEДOM. LIVE
Переглядів 1,1 млн
Арестович: Операция ВСУ в Курской области. @A.ShelestAlexey Arestovych
Переглядів 3 млн
My North Korean Holiday: The Funniest / Worst Place on Earth?Show Me the World
Переглядів 4,4 млн
I DEBUNK Woke History Lesson About ColonialismHistoryLegends
Переглядів 923 тис.
WOKE Activist Discovers Ancestors Were WHITE Slave OwnersHistoryLegends
Переглядів 365 тис.
Sky News at Ten as riots in Plymouth between two rival groups take placeSky News
Переглядів 83 тис.
LIVE: Russian dissidents speak out after prisoner swapThe Times and The Sunday Times
Переглядів 18 тис.
WOKE Latinos Shocked to be “WHITE” After DNA ResultsHistoryLegends
Переглядів 2,9 млн
Israel Iran Conflict News LIVE: Russia's Shoigu Meets with IRGC Commander General Bagheri in TehranFirstpost
Переглядів 49 тис.
Hollywood's PATHETIC Blackwashing of HistoryHistoryLegends
Переглядів 531 тис.
India Sucks! Don't Ever Come HereSmall Brained American
Переглядів 5 млн
«Синку, ти не переживай. Сюди вона не впаде, вони всі повз летять»: військовий про перші дні війниСуспільне Запоріжжя
Переглядів 696 тис.
бедный дед на ламборгини проверяет силу прохожих и платит за подъем гириABRACADABRA TV
Переглядів 8 млн
Jerry Heil & Volodymyr Dantes - ГУБИ У ГУБАХ (ПРЕМʼЄРА 2024)Jerry Heil
Переглядів 1,4 млн
РЕЙНДЖЕРС - ДИНАМО | Ліга Чемпіонів. Кваліфікація Q3 | 13.08.2024ФК «Динамо» Київ
Переглядів 332 тис.
Арестович: Операция ВСУ в Курской области. @A.ShelestAlexey Arestovych
Переглядів 3 млн
🔥 Уся правда про українську СУДЖУЗе Інтерв'юер
Переглядів 330 тис.
Gli occhiali da sole non mi hanno coperto! 😎Senza Limiti
Переглядів 10 млн
This is why I always say:
Dont be politically correct.
Be historically accurate.
@@simulify8726 like He said, historically accurate. You proved him correct by questioning western historian's narrative. He played the game well. you just played along with him.
century of humiliation
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa your existence is.
I couldn't agree more but, I would add that we are not responsible for the actions of long dead ancestors. Accurate interpretation of historical records is the foundation stone of peace and harmony.
@@brianmcdonald7107 exactly. Forgive but don't forget
As an Indian man living in Britain, I can hate the tragedies the British empire ravaged upon India, but I would never hold it against modern day Britons
we are filling rapidly with angry muslims who hate Britain and want revenge, for everything from the Crusades (which were defensive actions), to Afghanistan. I don't think they like Hindus and Sikhs much either. Wonder where British refugees will go if it gets critical. Indians, at least, have a homeland to return to. We don't
We did some bad things to India but without British rule there wouldn’t have been a political union called India. Brits gave India democracy, free press and the rule of law. Brits gave India railway. Between 2016 and 2020 the UK sent £1.9 billion in aid to India..
@@johnxforce4 some bad things 3.5 million people die in famine because of you and you call it some bad things ? That's just the biggest one and we paid for railways you did not do it out of your own pocket.and leave all this also please tell me when you ruled for 200 years in that region British raj was for almost 100 years so when it ended people told you transition will take 5-6 years maybe more for it to be peaceful and all what did you guys do 6 fucking months even our leaders asked British to stay so partition and all the things could go smoothly you royaly fucked it up.and i an indian so from my perspective let's forget all this let's forget partition also now when india was free you guys left india struggled alot for technology development and all that where was Britain ? Don't you think it would have made good impression on Indians if British companies and government were helping out india in development and it would have benefitted you also in long run but no you guys were busy wagging tail for Americans
@@johnxforce4 and 2 billion euros seriously dude ? Who do you think we are pakistan no one asked for your money and first of all Indian government does not accept aid from British it's you people doing all this through ngos and stuff pushing your propaganda in exchange in name of Christianity again which is not welcomed here. And you know what we don't care anymore as a country we are richer than you my kids generation will be richer than you British in personal wealth also and you guys are and will be irrelevant to the world just and american lapdog people acknowledge you because of your past in present there's nothing impressive and future is even more bleak for you guys so i don't have hatred for you people i have pity for what you have become and what future holds for you mini pakistan you will become i am waiting for that day ✌️✌️✌️
you live in Britain because its better than India ....right...
You cooked him so hard you can hear Gordon Ramsay complaining.
😂😂😂
"YOU OVERCOOKED HIM YOU SANDWIDCHGSGREG"
"STOP IT, YOU'RE BURNING IT. Bloody amateur."
If you say so broski. All of this sounds like alt right apologetics to me.
As an American even we were taught about how important it Indian troops were to both the uk and to America in both world wars. My grandfather who fought in WW2 use to tell me about how much respect he had for the Indian fighters. He told me about how the Indians fighters that was stationed next to each other, and would share their food with each other and because of my grandfather being a Cajun they’d trade spices from the Indians for the ice cream the United States was sending to its troops. They never was a huge population of the Indian people here in New Orleans, but I think my grandfather knew every single one of them that did settle here because he would always make sure to seek them out and to welcome them here because of how much he really loved them
Hey man I would love to hear more about your grandpa and indian soldiers story'
If it's on tiktok, it's guaranteed to be awful and factually incorrect.
Not always true but you're right for about 99% of it.
While people who watch tiktok claim the opposite
Is the enclave still around?
Not in China
@@buni1934 yes. My dad is an engineer for them
It takes a lot of balls to call people out on their bullshit, especially in today's times where everybody is rewritting history for their own purpose. Good job.
Facts!
Rhodesia took over Egypt in 1489
@@avus-kw2f213 and turkey doesn't exist am i right?
@@Hypogeal-Foundation no, but they deserved it... wait
@@Hypogeal-FoundationYES lol
White imperialists vs Muslim imperialists 😂
Who win? 😂
@@af5433 Historically, I think the white (Western European, to be specific) ones did. We’ll have to wait for a rematch to see for sure.
@capncake8837 ngl with the way things are going we might not have to wait to long for one😂😂😂😂
lets talk about the Muslim slave trade
Yeah it did happen so should I condemn what my ancestors did?
Yes, did we treat people as lower caste? No.
@@kennedy072 Yes, the Muslims did.
Yes Muslims treated others as lower class @@kennedy072
@@kennedy072Sure they did. If its a slave its a lower caste
@@nerminerminerminermislaves in Islamic law are regarded similar to a family member, the practices might've been otherwise but that's not the case for everything.
As an Indian , I am not kidding ,if britain would have only occupied India and left pakistan then that guy would have been the biggest supporter of british empire . Thats how they are built .
Pakistani always brainwash NRIs that British did that in reality muslim league aked for a separate country
True haha
he keeps saying us....is he saying pak are indians now...very convenient
They probably would have gladly steered clear of Pakistan my friend and I think they tried several times but sadly geopolitics of the time and yes, Russia.. Needed to expand their influence in the region to basically counter the Russian one. I think that was the only ever real value of pakistan.
before 1947 there was no pakistan it was a part of india untill some mughal ka chodal breaked it
"We can literally dig up dirt on every single nation on Earth." This is a great line.
And very true
@@whitezombie10 Yup. Humans are animals. Just like every other animal on the planet, the strong prey on the weak. Chances are, at some point in history, your ancestors were the strong ones preying on the weak of the time.
not the islamic prophet and his 5 caliphates after him
Not sealand.
@@Damnahh sure you can.
"I've Read" is the reason you are required to cite sources in Academia. Someone tell that Instagram guy a Buzzfeed article isn't to a contemporary source.
Average Anti-British Pakistani check list:
Married to Cousin: Check
Live in Britain: Check
You missed one: Hates England, Scotland and Wales and the indigenous people there.
@@freddiemedley5580 No they are just too stupid and uneducated about Britain to know about northern ireland😂
@@freddiemedley5580 Northern Ireland is part of the UK, not Britain.
@@ChrisR395 Britain is the British isles
Average Hindu comment: check
This man defends Britain's record more than most Brits
He is not wrong though.
@@AndrewDixon69 Nope, he's right abt the tiktok. Just morally void too.
@@AndrewDixon69bruh so it's ok to steal from other people put it in a museum and basically colonize them and treat them like animals
the border suck the only thing that the British were good at but for some reason they didn't want to do that there because it was hot or something
@@AndrewDixon69 stop stealing stuff and making it your own and rewriting history so it aline with your hypocrisy
@@AndrewDixon69His thoughts that british didn't wanted the partition is actually wrong , Completely agree that Muslims didn't wanted to live with us , and they wanted a separate country ,but also after three days of independence it was a british who signed the attack on kashmir "OPERATION GULMARGG" , because they wanted partition at every cost , reason being they wanted to control Pakistan and put it as a proxy against the Russians in Xinjiang where they were having nuclear Weapons test.
His ancestors came to Britain voluntarily and now he hates his home country. He is British. He probably does not know how good he has it. I find people like this repulsive.
Repatriation time.....
I hate people who live in the country they supposedly hate due to historical and political reasons
No. He's not British. Clearly he doesn't want the best for people like me, doesn't look like one of me, and sounds like nothing would make him happier than cultural genocide if British people, and he makes this pretty clear in his video. What he is, is a subversive pretender and a national security risk.
Yeah wants to come and enjoy the benefits of the country but doesn’t support or respect the customs of the native population. I’d start deporting people who have that much hate for supposedly they’re own country.
@Fox2 he’s a British Indian, British isn’t an ethnicity. English is.
Muslim invaders were evil but british empire was no different from that. One gave Taj Mahal while other gave Railways both in exchange of lives of millions
What is the use of Taj Mahal? Nothing. It just became a tourist attraction. Also, because of the Mughal Empire that many Indians were forced to convert to islam and eventually became the reason why it has been divided into 3 countries.
Taj Mahal was a Hindu Temple actually .. the Mughals brought nothing but persecution and death .. the british brought science and technology
@@cristiano7ronaldoTHEGOATboth are evil 🤡🤡
@@cristiano7ronaldoTHEGOAT
Not forgetting the British only do for their kingdom but the arabs do for their cult
Arabs taken more land than European colonizers yet arabs accused European as land theft
Which really ironic since arabs stole more and even their holy cities are resulted from THIEVES 😂😂😂😂😂
@@cristiano7ronaldoTHEGOAT poopjeets are weak, colonized so many times, thats your inferiority problem
This is great video. Especially as he's French. The Pakistani complaining that Britain gave them the country they wanted, and as he grew up here gave him everything he has. As a Muslim he knows who the worst and most destructive colonisers in south Asia were.
Easy answer, the British wear
@@RaiyanNazif no true answer - Muslim invaders.
Great idea. Lets move our families to Britain and then teach our children to hate it. Only a Pakistani coulf have such a brilliant idea. Coudin marriage does wonders for intellectual development.
The British definitely were, no way your economy gets shit on like that during the British and still get compared to what the Muslims did💀💀💀
@@flow9a981 what Muslim did?
(Mughal empire is not a Islamic empire just the rulers are Muslim just like British empire the rulers
Are Christians but it was not a Christian empire.
Remember that one lady who claimed that Ancient Rome didn’t exist, insulted a professor, and said that Greek and Latin are the same language? Also, could you consider doing a collaboration with Skallagrim since he’s also known to cover historical content on his channel? Thanks.
((( )))
Or Metatron.
cyrillic and latin alphabets are related symbols like A, M,T,X,O and K are the same , plus others like S and C make the same sound like the sea or the C and Bee and Vee sound similar
@@eioclementi1355 still if someone told me that they were the same id want to shoot them tbh
@@eioclementi1355 Greek alphabet was the base for Cyrillic due to Greek Christian orthodox monks visiting the old Russian empire, when they didn´t have an alphabet
I feel bad for my boy Timur. He went through all the trouble of establishing one of the greatest empires from the ground up, killing tens of millions, having a higher k/d ratio than Hitler, nearly destroying the Ottomans, breaking the back of the golden horde, and then his descendants established the Mughal empire. But in the end, he became an obscure historical figure only known by history nerds.
#sedlyf
Those Turkic/ moguls were bad boys !
He should have let some of his conquered subjects live, built a global media empire to amplify their grievances, and established a banking system to empower them. *Then* he'd be well known like funny-mustache-man, and the ADL would hound his ancestors forever.
He didn't just die. He cursed his own tomb that anyone who would try to unearthen his resting place will be cursed with endless cycles of Death. USSR under Stalin did that. and we all know what happened next.
@@patriotenfield3276 just came for this comment
Let me tell a real story.
I am from a small village in India. There we use a bridge that was built by the British more than 100 years ago but strong, beautiful, and intact. Our politicians decided to demolish this and build a new one . With huge cost and time we manage to build one. Guess what a crack appears with in 2 months. They close traffic and repair it , which they still do after every heavy rainfall. Finally, our brilliant politicians unveil the truth. The "British ". Yes, it is the fault of the British .
just because you saw one bridge from british time does not mean all bridges built by british have survived for 100 years. try to understand the bias in our observation.
That made me laugh
White slavery abolished in mid 1800s is bad. Muslim slavery abolished in mid 1900s is OK
White slavery was 10 times bigger than the muslims one.
@@ABanRocks still, Muslims still had slavery, and SOME STILL DO!
Still expecting am afraid
As a Pakistani, I can give proof that what that Tiktoker is saying is pure b.s, our education system teaches us the division of Subcontinent pretty well and why the partition happened, he just didn't pay attention.. anyways keep up the good work, History Legends, Love from Pakistan
Aren't you angry if the British deliberately drew a map in one month and gave cashmere to India without clear boundaries and made the two countries go to war and some of Pakistan's GDP had to be used for the military. they also do the same thing to Palestine
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa If they could have, Indians would have done the same
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa the Israel Palestine issue happened because the Arabs refused division of Palestine.Israel was even ok with sharing Jerusalem with the Arab palestine, but the Arabs refused. and stop watching too much zakir naik. that terrorist is going to get you killed someday . if you want your own good , report him to authorities for acts of inciting violence.
finally , something we can agree on. and what are your views on the pakistani history textbooks controversy?
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa no matter how they drew it, both sides would not agree. War is the only solution to those that refuse conciliation.
I am a indian and I get cringed when people say how great mugal emperors were and hindu muslims had absolute unity and it was the best time.
dont blame the religion blame the ppl
Just then? My head went nuts when this tik tok guy said the all of the indian sub continent was one nation. Like, what? Not even under the mughals was all of the sub continent united. Like what the hell is this guy even talking about he literally doesn't know anything at all about history.
@@ceejay1476 in india hindu muslim(Sunni) we hate each other to our core. The only way of peacefull coexistence is ignoring other side existence or u get very rich and untouched by society.
@@Damnahh no read the Koran first
The Mugals were not the saints the Muslim portray them and not the devils the Hindus potrayed them. They were not there to loot. They were just as native as everybody else as it became there home.
Yeah .. prior to the arrival of the British the Kingdon of South East Asia..had everything... everyone lived in harmony with each other and nature.. people had Bengal tigers as pets and played cricket all day long and programed for google only 20 hours a week.. The jains, hindus and muslims all respected each other.. it was like paradise until... on one dark moon less night a British frigate arrived
Well.done......a great summary.......South Asian Jingoism is laughable,.almost childish in its delusion....feeble, emotional outbursts.....
@@billprendgergast8976 what I find laughable is that some of them blame the British for the caste system I used to work with an Indian chef and he told me that the caste system was already in place when the British got there and it comes from all the way back to when Alexander the great conquered the indus Valley
@@Yoshimitsu420 Exactly. In writings from that period the British were appalled.by the caste discrimination and treatment of the untouchables. It still goes on today..Yet the Indians somehow manage to manipulate every problem into 'The British did it'...I have lived in both Japan and India..Japan is possibly 400 years ahead of India and a highly polished civilization. When Indians sprout about how great India is I often retort." Japan had a Shinkansen in 1964. India did not have a single working toilet."
Tigers are not pets
@@jessicanelson8228 do you not understand sarcasm?
As a history "nerd" I must say this was such a great video with more information I learned today, so thank you for this. Perfect History class.
Oh, and for this tik-toker idiot...I love how he lives in England but says he is "Pakistani" no Sir, you are a colonialist! another fun fact for him to learn 🤣
And if he is so patriotic to Pakistan, why doesn't he move back there?
Because they know that Pakistan is not so good a place to LIVE!
what kinda racist bs are you talking about? Your talking points are literally nazi talking points btw. Embarassing.
He knows, his nation is sheet whole. Guy dont understand, times were bad, clown.
As a German, you learn a lot about our history, back to the Roman War. How is it that a lot of other countries do not learn thier History?
We do learn our history but the version that our government and intellectuals want us to learn. For example in Mexico they teach us all about the native civilizations but nothing about the history of Spain, who conquered the land and started our national culture. They just casually teach us that the Spaniards came out of nowhere for no reason, just to plunder the land
Some of these countries are controlled by totalitarian regimes who obviously don't want their people to really learn about the historic truth.
German bro we know our history very well than u bcoz it is well recorded every moment, who r u preaching to look at u, how stupid u were wanted to conquer whole world 😂 f'd up by allies
Exactly 💯
We do. Its just that everyone else sleeps through those classes
I love how accurate you are. As an Indian its refreshing to see someone speak facts. These tiktokers claim that white colonization is evil but before that everything was peaceful.
you are right well i am a indian and when it came to history indian education system only blame british but never try to touch mughals
@@vaibhavthakur9234 well then it prove that indians are not one people or nation
@@vaibhavthakur9234 okya look i agree that indians have same roots but indians are so much differente from one an another that they are like different nation china and europe are genetically homogeneous then india
@@vaibhavthakur9234 they look bit differente not completly different and that can be say about chinese like northern han chinese are taller and lighter then southern han chinese but the truth is truth india is more like africa then anything like europe or china besite from genetics i think for nation to be unite they alaways need some kind of force in india case mughal and british empire unite it and in china's case mongal and manchu unite it
How many Indians did the British nobility or royals marry? Let's be real they thought of Indians as a lesser race.
As a bengali whenever I come up with the horrors of British colonization and how brutal they were to us, I always bring up the various positive societal changes forced upon us. Forced because due to religious or cultural ties we didnt wanted to refrain from many bad practices, like sotidaho (Burning the wife of a dead husband alive). In most cases British faced strong opposition, yet they persisted. Which didn't made any economical sense, they did those because they deemed them the moral thing to do. Denying those will be dishonest and downright hypocritical.
What the hell is bengali? Dont you have any nation to represent?
@@soumodipkarmakar402You don't know what the British did to Bengalis
Almost a million Bengalis died due to a famine artificially created by Winston Churchill.
we don't need Whites talking about Indian History, we already know it better
@@prasheel_ashok_shetty 🤡Bengali? No nationality?
@@prasheel_ashok_shettyDuring the Bengal famine, there was a war. Thanks to the Government of India Act 1935, the British Raj Government in Delhi was not responsible for food and agriculture, that power was transferred to the provincial government now run by Indians. Burma, which was part of the British Empire, and in cases of earlier famines in India supplied rice was now part of the enemy Japanese Empire. Other provinces themselves refused to help Bengal but when the British Rac Central government forced them to help, they all complained that the British Raj Government is breaking the Government of India Act 1935. PM McKenzie King of Canada offered to send grain but Churchill argued that it would take a lot of time so instead ordered Australia to send 440000 tons of wheat to Bengal in the middle of a World War. He also did a grain swap with Sri Lanka or Ceylon. 50000 tons of grain blew up in Bombay docks. Viceroy of India, Lord Wavell on seeing the situation, called in the Indian Army in the middle of the war to distribute food. Since most of the soldiers were North Indians eating primarily wheat based bread or roti and most Bengalis were rice eaters, the population had to be trained. Also Hindu Marwari merchants were hoarding grain even when Bengalis were dying all around them as they were connected to Congress and wanted to destabilize the ruling Muslim majority party of Bengal, the Krishak praja Party.
Know real history not anti British Congressi propaganda.
@@prasheel_ashok_shetty bro it was a fucking cyclone. And the British+ Dominions shipped hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of tons of grain to India in an attempt to alleviate the famine while at the same time Britain was almost starving.
It's very trendy to hate the place you were born that gave you everything
It never ceases to amaze me how many mental gymnastics people have to go through to call out white colonialism while COMPLETELY ignoring colonialism by Africa, the Middle East, Asia, etc.
And simultaneously creating a Eden-like fantasy about every situation that existed prior to the colonialism they are pointing out.
It's not really mental gymnastics, it's the academic dogma of our age. Like I guess you can call it mental gymnastics, but understand that the universities are literally teaching them to do those specific gymnastic moves.
There is also a post-colonialism created Eden-like fantasy, as in " everything will be fine now that we have chased the evil colonizers". There are many examples that prove the opposite.
cause the truth makes non whites look really really bad
Wakanda 😂
The only skills shown by this guy is his avoidance of historical reality.
He knows nothing about reality, never mind history.
He thinks historical reality is a morality play, and all he wants to know is not what happened, but who are the goodies and baddies.
This is a caricature of history-but he prefers to wallow in his ignorance and stupidity.
I'd bet good money this gut has never been near a library but did his research via ignorant You Tube and Tik Tok postings.
Mughals were bad, but they didn't take money out of India, they lived and spent the money in India itself. But the British took Indian taxpayers money, used to create what you call 'London'. You can't just compare the two. Both bad, but one severely undermines the brutality of the other.
They lived and spent the money in India: for themselves!
And...
by what right did they suppress Indians?
All the way from England, you understand the history far better than 99%of schools teach here today.
yep
I'd say 100% at this point. Even the top ones get more stuff wrong, at least in this area
then why queen hadn't apologised for the sins of British empire.
@@Mrinal-og6tg Why haven't the descendants of other empires ( Muhgal,Han, Sassanid, Russian, Spanish,French and especially Belgian) apologised?
@@nigelbagguley7606 Exactly, he won't respond cause he's got no other points. Plus he doesn't know about her 'dont explain don't complain ' policy
The first sentence that he says is an eye opener in itslef. "Growing up in Britain he was taught that Indians are our enemies". What kind of hate mongering parents would say that to a child. I now understand the reason for tensions in Leicester and Birmingham.
I also find it interesting that he doesn't expand on *who* taught him this. It certainly wasn't the British school system, I can tell you that for free. His racist parents are who taught him that and that is somehow Britain's fault.
The tensions between Indians and Pakistanis occurred before the Brits were involved in India.
It’s ironic, hilariously embarrassing, but anti-British for a Pakistani to try and claim that the disunity between Indians and Pakistanis only occurred because of Britain, when it was the Muslims in India that pushed for their own state because they didn’t want to be ruled by a non-Muslim majority.
He is playing on an anti-white, anti-British, anti-western narrative that because Indians are Pakistanis are both South Asian and ‘brown’ then they must have always seen themselves as united brothers, when it was their huge cultural differences that distinguish them from each other more than anything.
Indeed !
Leicester, (no to long ago), became majority non English, (and I mean English), with massive imported foreign problems... Birmingham, (though not far behind), is minority English, (and I mean English), and again, with massive imported foreign problems... little to non of the foreign people's who settled in England, were ever assimilated & absorbed by the native population... and thus, are still foreign people's... who clearly have imported their foreign problems to our land... England. As an Englishman... there is one fraise which will always be said by us Englishmen long after England ill's have been purged, and that is... *"We were never asked"!*
He's a pakistani.
I live in the UK. This type of numpty is everywhere here. If they keep going like this, they might just collapse this once great country!
It's a dump that's why they came to India soon it will return to it's glory of swamps as it always was and people will leave the dump 😂😂😂
Might? Dude I live in the states and we’re on the same exact sinking ship.
At least British builds something, islam just takes down what is already built
Tbf Britain too destroyed the entire trade and agriculture of India. Whatever 2-3% they built was to take Indian resources to Britain (LOOT) with ease. Still they weren't Muslims invaders who literally wanted to eliminate Hindus from their very own birthplace i.e India!
What British build can you mention it
@@AyaZhadi520 Modern World
Great insight, unfortunately the people who make these tiktoks only care about surface level history and will never look into this, pushing hate and dividing us further.
You have been had, LOL
Romans: *Sorry I couldn't hear you over this decisive Roman victory*
"I use tiktok"
{Translate}
"I'm a fucking idiot"
@@fvckgoo9le242 haha this is music to my ears
You should just rephrase ‘surface level history’ to propaganda.
Being born in Britain, Saad Mustafa was more likely to survive infancy and live a longer, healthier and safer life than not just the majority of humans, but just about every other species on Earth. He should be grateful for that.
He should be expelled to his native homeland. After all, he shows far more loyalty to Pakistan than the UK.
Hmm could have said the same about India before Britan threw us under the bus
@@yedhukrishnan6700 Always someone else's fault, isn't it...
@@yedhukrishnan6700 No you couldn't lol
@@yedhukrishnan6700unless you were a widow, then you would be burned like a witch...
"Indians and Dogs are not allowed" - Britain's huge respect for Indian people. This guy is just playing whataboutery
facts
Indians and Dogs not allowed us a myth. There is zero proof something like this existed.
Indians and dogs not allowed was a myth.
Lol this isn't whataboutary😂
This is just basic facts.if you think the Pakistani guy is telling the truth then you might wanna get your brain checked.
@JamesMacDonald-dy6mythey did nothing with them
Tamil never genocide them
It was only a trade dispute
Tamils didn't ruled anywhere in Indonesia
Pakistanis amd puunjabis learn history from political parties 😂
Had an interesting conversation with an Indian guy once. Asked if he thought Britain should pay reparations for their conquest of the Subcontinent, to which he replied no. When I asked why, he replied: "They only pick on Britain for two reasons: 1. It's more recent, and the effects of it are still being felt and 2. Britain has the most money to spare. These people don't care about the suffering of their ancestors, all they care about is money." Can't say I disagree with him.
Edit: Seems like I've started a war in the replies.
I don't agree with reparations as well but due to entirely different reasons. First of all England can never pay back for all the atrocities and tyranny committed here. Putting a monetary cap on those would be disrespectful to all those who have died due to the unfair governance during colonial times.
Secondly, reparations in the form of apologies would be much more appreciated than some sum of money.
Thirdly, even if England wanted to give monetary payment, whom would it be given to - the raj has been divided into India, Pakistan, bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan and Pakistani economies are falling so they might need some aid, but India and Bangladesh don't.
And, these are not the only countries who were colonised.
If, England starts giving reparations to all the colonised countries in monetary form, it would go into debt.
Improving trade relations and investing in those economies would be much better than going the other route.
The Anglo-Saxons stole 45 trillion dollars of the South Asian subcontinent. Whether they pay it back is a separate matter.
Similar thing to the black Americans who want reparations. They're happy to ignore the millenia of slavery perpetrated by Africans on other Africans, but since the white people bought people who were already enslaved by their own race, suddenly white people have to cough up money for it
dumbest reasoning to keep all the artifacts
@@farukhsheikh5790 May I ask one thing, What's an Apology gonna do? We Indians need no apology. It would be crocodile tears anyway.
You are spot on mate, people are so ill educated about history, but our education system is also to blame.
Dude both this Mughal offshoot and the white pompous brit both were colonisers of our country and looted our country dry. And they would do it again if given the opportunity. So don’t be so naive, decolonize your mind and stand up for yourself and your community. Set your own narrative and don’t let these outsiders set the narrative.
Muslims never colonised India, it was conquest.
He’s chatting nonsense. How much do you even know about Indian history?
@Abdur I know enough! What I do agree with is if british are evil for colonizing india, then so are mughals! I dont see much of a difference in terms of atrocities. Past is past, and the future is what matters and indias looks 👌
@@arijitnath9626 India is doing itself now because they have a large working population and a thriving economy and it’s getting stronger. Empires have always invaded and killed, there are good and bad in all empires. “I know enough” lol typical response from someone who doesn’t know enough!
The Muslim League was formed by the British after the Shimla meeting
why are you replying to yourself@@aaacsacahh9088
Sau baat ki ek baat neither any muslim empire nor the British empire ever benefitted india and this is a universal truth
As a non-Muslim and Indian, I just love how two evils are fighting over which one is more evil.lol
Lol 😂
😂😂
😂 👍
😂👍🏻
Agreed 💯👍
The internet is full of liars and mediocrity. Thanks the universe there is still people who likes to do their research and shared unbiased. Keep doing this work
This woke community is killing google. Where can i find these records
Stay woke, beloved❣️
@@FedUpSista"Get woke, go broke." -wise words
In India there were multiple kingdom, dynasties, languages, subculture...
But we were one civilization, we all were and are connected together by our cultural and civilization values...
There was always the concept of one civilizational State, within this civilization State many kingdoms, dynasties, culture, language flourished..
There r multiple Verse from our civilizational and dharmik texts.
I'm writing the meaning of one such verse from Vishnupuran - " the south of the Himalayas and North of the sea is called Bharat ( India) and and the people of this region are called Bharati ( Indian).
But isn’t this like the idea of Europe or the Holy Roman Empire. More a concept than a nation for most of history
you portrayed the Indian history in the most unbiased way possible and I really liked that. You definitely earned my subscription
Disagree
Saying something like "Muslim" colonisers is same as saying "Christians" colonised Europe. Which though is true to some extent but is very different from British colonialism of Asian and African countries where British were invaders and not natives to the land.
They were racially motivated to commit acts of racial violence against people of the land and consider them as not equal humans.
They looted from their counties and made themselves rich and then they made a run back to their countries leaving the natives of the colonies to die from famine.
Muslims were almost always natives of the land they ruled. They never took the wealth out other nation in most cases and made the areas they ruled as their country or capital, they didn't rule from London from example.
So the analogy put by him was wrong and unacceptable.
@@blackpanthar906 Jesus Christ dude, so because the motives were racially based instead of ethnicity based, the r4 p3, pillage, murder & conquest is all ok then?the analogy works fine, you just don’t like it
@@blackpanthar906
“Muslims were always natives” no, the Hindus were there first as they always have been
“The Muslims never took wealth out of the country” again, categorically false, they also destroyed idols & temples filled with gold
“They never ruled from a far away place like London” so because they moved in & started ruling over everyone, it makes all of this just fine?
@@blackpanthar906 sorry Muslims of india still can't live with hindus..imagine how brutal Muslim invaders were...British empire was way better then Muslim invaders....
I am arab myself, but i hate it when others call someone racist for no reason.
As a arab you fell superior of all races. After all you are the true descendents of ismael. 😂
There are a lot of words this type of person love to throw around without understanding (or perhaps not caring) what the actual meaning behind the words are.
It´s just a tactic to shut down uncomfotable opinions in the west.
It’s not about being racist
You can’t justify your occupation of a whole subcontinent just because some other people did it
Especially if you are not even from the same continent or have the same culture
I don’t support either of them but you can see that he is super pro Britain as if they were angels
I also hate when people be racist to white people and get over it, it's sad and people say you can't be racist to white but that's society
it is true that Britain exploited crazy wealth from india. Its possible they stole trillions of dollars worth of goods. Yes india was divided and got overpowered. But the British really steal most of india's wealth. Even the instructure built by the British was meant to take the ressources from the mines and spice fields and so on went straight to sea ports avoiding most cities thus causing the cities to become poor. The same thing is still happening in Africa right now. Leaving a few warlords super wealthy while the rest are living in poverty, most don't even have internet. Yes the British united India, but they also exploited them. Canada and the US were only different because the natives almost all died so it became Britain 2.0
I've been to India, and believe me, with most of the people I've met, except for the Muslims, everyone else whether they are Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, or Christians, seems to have an utter dislike for the Mughals. I've been to a local Gurudwara, a Sikh temple, and the paintings I saw in the outer Langar Hall building were horrifying depictions of how Sikh Gurus and leaders along with Hindu scholars were faced with torture and persecution at the hands of the Mughals. So yeah, the Brits were bad, but no one had any love for the Mughals. The Mughals were so bad that they united almost every ethnicity of India against them, whether it was the Marathas, Sikhs, Pashtuns, Gonds, Rajputs, Bundelas, Ahoms, or Bhils.
this is so true im Welsh from Britan and the schools kept telling us how bad the English treated us and how they took our country and culture and i was so mad i hated the English but i really got in to history and realized if i kept my attitude id just be adding to the problem and things turned out so what am i mad about.
The people who spread that nonsense are the same people who spread Scottish independence. They will fracture this world with their ideologies and everyone will end up bankrupt. The Welsh and Scottish economies are built up by England, if the union collapses, ALL members would suffer. The people who spread this ideology are the ones trying to attain power for themselves by breaking away like that Scottish b*tch (I don't remember her name). The reason they say such things is to put themselves in a better position, not necessarily everyone else.
@@meekos699 verry true.
To be fair, the Welsh had it really good. It still exists, most countries conquered 700 years ago don’t exist, let alone keep their history, language and culture.
@@maxdavis7722 Not for lack of trying though. It truly is a testament to the indomitable will of the remaining Celtic people that they still exist at all. If they were pretty much any other people the Welsh and Irish would've been completely erased/assimilated, just like the rest of the Britons in modern day England and Scotland, or like the Gauls in modern day France.
@@ryujin9568 that’s very unlikely. Suggesting that every other group that didn’t survive to this point simply weren’t as tough or resilient as the celts is really just an insult to them. It’s much more likely that the English just cared much less about homogeneity in their nation (which is generally pretty much true, it’s very individualist and hasn’t done much historically to force the English together). England also recognised the Welsh people very early on, the Welsh really didn’t have to do much fighting to exist, the English gave it to them during the Tudor period.
Finally the celts are not resilient at all, they dominated most of Europe and lost pretty much all land they covered.
As a South African we learn about the colonial period (at least through one of my Uni majors) and you know what I like about the studies that I do, they tell you historical facts, and they also tell you the perspecrives from Africans as well as Europeans. One quote that I love in one of my books are "remember that the way people thought during that time reflected the politics of that time" in a way they acknowledge the wrongdoings of colonialism without blaming modern day Europeans for it. They reflect on the way that things just were the way they were because that's what that time period entailed. Yes, colonialism has a lot of bad things, but we can't overlook the good things or blame modern day people for it
Indeed. Also what people did to their own people were different back then, then what we would do now.
yes as well that many other countries and cultures were trying to invade. As far I have had history the Mongolians tried to come into Europe. Other European countries invaded other European countries. The Ottoman Empire try to come into Europe as well. Yet these were often forgotten or people just didn't care about it because we don't pretend to have an innocent history because we very well know that no single country/culture has an innocent history. That also helps. I just hope people will never do it again... although Russia is now invading Ukraine, but that was the leader that decided that the people were all surprised. I guess it's always the elite. The rest of the people are always surprised. I am just happy to know that my family never left my homeland at least not back to 1400s.
Just like in a few years we will forget about what USA did in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and people will forget about what Russia is doing in Ukraine.
@@Lipi9148 yes.
@@Lipi9148 majority of people these days don't even know that the Soviets invaded Afghanistan too, or even know that the US lost the war in Vietnam.
@@johnr797 I find it hilarious when western countries lecture Asian and African countries and teach us how to live, how to think and set rules for how democracy should be and all they do is invade other sovereign nation for pure selfish reasons and trade with non-democratic nations.
As an Anglo-Indian-mughalite, it's good to see that some people really do have the knowledge of knowing.
I like how his thumbnail a fundamental fact about the Muslim colonizers, they didnt extort Indians wealth, they kept it in India. The invested in India, not take it back to Uzbekistan or the Ottoman Empire. They became one with the land. They were not hero’s, they had their major flaws, but they at least invested in Indian streets, in Indian housing and universities. They treated India as their new home, not something to be exploited. The Muslim colonizers were not good, but they were better than the British.
I love the argument of “we are not taught (insert subject matter here.)” Problem with this narrative is that no one is actively stopping you from learning about world history, at least when it comes to living in Britain and The United States, and pretty much any other country that doesn’t actively censor the materials used to research and read up on recorded history. Primary schools are meant to give broad information, especially when it comes to history. If you want to learn about specific times or places in history in great detail in an academic setting, you will pretty much have to go to a university.
Yeah why should a British school teach the history of India?? If you want all of the world you have to stay in school for all your life
@@whitezombie10 you don't have to stay in school all your life, but committing to that fact will teach the history of the world.
They also censor in US. So...
It's almost like they expect lo leave high school with a Phd in each subject. And sometimes they do teach X subject matter, but people fail to recognise they were not interested at all, or were probably complaining about "what am I gonna use this for in real life?", or the teacher constantly had to stop the class to address disruptive students.
BTW "What am I gonna use this for?"... I graduated high school in '97. History is not my livelihood, but it certainly keeps me entertained during my spare time and helps me get a better understanding about current issues, countries, cultures, etc.
@@whitezombie10 yeah whyy??? It will remind them how broke they were😂
If you don't like the UK, leave it.
He would but the UK won't leave his country alone that's the problem. Oh and the UK is biggest shithole on earth
Many people said that to your grandparents but they didn't.
@@unknown-mx9it oh man😂😂😂
@@unknown-mx9it Just nailed it bro
If you don't like brown people and especially Indians then return our antiques which are in that THIEF MARKET aka British museum and return that Kohinoor
India: 😤
Pakistan: 😤
Me and the boys advocate for Greater Bengal State 😳😩
Love this bro, thank you!!! The whole time I was thinking he's gonna miss something out, you got everything right. I'm shocked and grateful at you for being so historically accurate. Thank you so much
I am an Indian. You nailed it brother. This video should be viewed by every south asians.
You are not Indian.
@@abhinandsnath Well you guessed by the username. Fair assumption I’d say but there are plenty of Christians here so he could be Indian
@@harshvardhanmankotia6492 Yeah. But it's not the usual Indian Christian name.
@@abhinandsnath what is the usual indian christian name? jai john, williams pandey, george thakur?
@@harshvardhanmankotia6492 it could be a made up name.
I am Indian (not that that gives me a position of authority in this subject though), and I completely agree with the points you make here. I just think that one of the reasons why people think of the British colonisation as being "more evil" is because it was in recent history, and the people it affected are still alive today. I'm sure if the Moguls colonised India instead of the British at that time, the roles would be reversed. We have a fair bit of Mogul integration, when it comes to media, if anyone here remembers Akhbar and Birbal? But again, great video
Akbar was the only tolerant among them. and despite being tolerant,he destroyed many temples in chitoorgarh just to show Maharana Pratap how much he is powerful.
No man, I agree with most of what he said. But EIC stealing trillions is mostly true. If you are really Indian, you should what they did to our farmers for growing spices and cotton. (Spices were like gold at the time). Also, the Idea of India existing long back even though for most of its history, India was in pieces. There are mentions of unified India in texts.
There is some truth to the tik tok guys narrative as well bengal famine did happen. British slaughtered a lot of indians. Also Kashmir they left it unresolved and india and Pakistan are in indefinite arms race while the rest of the world gets real development.
Ignorance is not an excuse.
@@geraldg350 yeah, it's a mistake
As an Indian hindu whose ancestors have seen the worst kind of times for multiple generations, and we are still seeing the huge threat to our civilization and culture. I just have to say no one has been merciful to us, from foreign muslim invaders, mughals(timurids as we call them), britishers and all European colonialists, literally none of them have been kind to us through out the history. We have suffered constant threat to our lives, identity and peace. We were fortunate enough to have revolutionary and visionary leaders among ourselves from time to time to show us the path to unity and fighting the evil together. I salute to all those know and unknown fighters who have sacrificed their lives for us and our future generations so that we are able to live in relatively peaceful times with injured yet intact identity we have been able to protect all this while, we must make sure this streak of independence and strength within ourselves continues and nobody dares to even think of raising eye towards our motherland.
Nobody can take this away from us now.
And yet, the ability of the Sanatana Dharma to absorb the light from all sources (which was the pluralism that Mahatma Gandhi and Swami Vivekananda supported) has allowed it prosper. Despite the harms committed by Islamic invasions in the North (people like Aurangzeb were particularly problematic), there were also more harmonious interactions in the South as well as in many parts of the North thanks to the pluralistic efforts of people such as Kabir and even Emperor Akbar (to a certain extent). I would also say that British rule was significantly worse than any other major Empire as it was during their period when India's economy stagnated and declined. During the Mughal era and before, it was one of the largest in the world. The Mughals did not carry the Taj Mahal out of India. Throughout history, people have faced opposition when they tried to express the truth. Prophet Muhammad was famously forced to escape from Mecca to Medina in order to escape persecution. The early Christians faced animosity from both the Jews and the Romans. What was done to the Jews during the 20th century is not hidden from most individuals. India, and Sanatana Dharma, have thankfully had and incorporated ideas such as Advaita Vedanta and Anekantavada that have helped it see the truth in more than one location. The Islamic view of Wahdat al Wujud has some interesting points of agreement with Advaita (particularly on the idea of the unity of being). Of course, we should not be ignorant and pretend that Islamic extremism and other threats do not exist. I only hope that such issues can be resolved through a meaningful dialogue rather than potentially immensely destructive conflicts that would cause a loss of much that is valuable. 🙏🇮🇳☮️☮️
While we blame the British we don’t see the plank in our own eyes. The biggest enemy was not Mughals, British, Portuguese or Persians or Greeks. It was Hinduism itself! Caste wickedness brought us to our knees. That’s why we couldn’t fight not defend. We were already beaten and burdened by the society. Still you are not wantin to accept this fact.
The British rediscovered alot of your lost architecture and did alot of archeological digs to preserve your history.
Have you ever watched Praveen Mohan he travels all through India to study your temples, and other ancient sites.
He gives the French,and British Officers and Explorers credit for rediscovering the ancient sites and helping preserve them.
He says the Muslim Invaders tried to destroy alot of the Sacred Temples and even tried to outlaw other Religions such as Hinduism, that's why there were wars.
The British Never outlawed The Hindu Religion or destroyed your ancient architecture!
It is good that India is becoming a stronger country, I'm proud that India is America's ally and I'm glad you're Not China's ally.
America could hate the British for what they did to our country and my ancestors could hate them for what they did to Ireland, but it's Not anyone living today that's at fault, or anyone living today suffering from those times.
@@michellerichardson1427lol rediscover architecture? While robbing everything else? The Mughals integrated into India, the British robbed India blind.
I can't take anybody who says "Britisher" seriously. And you are still at risk? 🤣 stfu the only people India is at risk to is its own people
As an Indian Person
British were bad 👎
But Islamic Rulers were worse
🇮🇳❤🇬🇧 😊
As a British person with ancestors who fought for the empire and ancestors who fought against it, if anyone were to ask me if British imperialism was good or bad, objectively speaking and from what I've read, I say "probably both".
@@invisibleman4827 My ancestors also helped the British Empire to win in both the World Wars. Without us Indians British could have never won those wars
@@ujjalsharma621 You're probably right. I reckon that Indian and subcontinent soldiers who served in WW1 and WW2 deserve more recognition than they get
@@invisibleman4827 🇮🇳🕉️🤝✝️🇬🇧
@@ujjalsharma621 🇬🇧❤️🇮🇳☺️
Brother as an Indian I am saying that yes brits did atrocities but we also gained from them many things.. Our administration railway system and a modern form of Democracy etc. we gained a lot from Brits but nothing from Islamic invaders.. But the Islamic Invaders Did more harm to Indian societies they destroyed indian education system completely.
Bro All the Invasions, be it European, Central Asian, or Islamic, were plundering India. They didn't directly want to benefit us from it. British Education and Railway was there to help Britain exploit India's Resources. Mughals spent so much on their own entertainment (The Gardens, the palaces) that no one wanted India to Benefit, be it the Mughals, the British, or other Europeans. This guy is justifying Colonialism by taking a rant on British. He is bashing the other guy for cherry-picking the facts, but he himself is cherry-picking British deeds amongst atrocities and sugarcoating colonialism.
Nonsense. Mughals couldn't break Indian spine. Brits did it easily by converting India and pausing its progress, ruining it's culture for 70 years
They made them for themselves not for you
@@Timeisless Who are using it now? … Them or us?
@@Helicopter007no one. That’s gone. What people are using now is something made by themselves for themselves. Are we to thank somebody who stabbed us for giving us a free knife?
The most hilarious part of this is that these people are not history majors or students, they are most often cultural anthropologists who read a Wiki article and some other pseudo-historical hearsay and decided to regurgitate their oversimplified, childish explanation...
Ok history professor or so called expert
@@srgplay4526 Did he say he was a professor or expert? No. No he did not. He hasn't even given his opinion on the matter, which equates to his beliefs.
@@plantboy6249 so why do u mind what I reply/comment just fk off
Wikipedia is pants.
Whenever I listen to people like that TikToker I just hear "I hate you, but I still want your stuff" directed at the place he calls home.
They need to go back
@@ImWatchingYou69 you can’t do jack shit to make them leave, seethe
@Michelle-bm5pg If I moved to India and then cried about how it doesn't feel like home would you keep the same energy
@@WhiteSage2 i dont think you would be deported though would you?
@@plantboy6249 and why shouldn’t you be?
I don't understand why we can't celebrate the accomplishments and criticize the failings of every society. Isn't that how we learn and progress? Isn't that what civilization is?
Britain was right to humanise the land of: India, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, and the Americas. Colonialism is a good form of humanisation that should not be condemned upon.
When learning about the British Empire and WW2 I was definitely taught that Indians bravely fought for the British, the British have profound respect for those who served the nation just look at the admiration that the Ghurkas get from us.
Really give us back our 45 trillion😂😂
The Indians that fought the Japanese to save the Brritish Raj reading your comment: 👁👄👁
@@netaji-thebritishslayerif they had 45 trillion dollars in the past they would have conquered the world 🤡
@@netaji-thebritishslayer what equation led you to that figure?
@@netaji-thebritishslayer That figure is literally a lie, youd know where it comes from if you watched the vid - which you didn't.
British weren't the ones who kept India together, after the british left modern India was divided into 500 princely states and Sardaar Vallabh bhai Patel United all those 500 princely states together. These princely states were given a choice either to join India or Pakistan or remain Independent to which majority voted to join India. Otherwise great video.
They waged a war to join nit not a option
yes but when you been together for so many years in the british era why you have to choise to divide india again...so it was a logic choise to vote for keep all princely states together
@@razoo911 what?
Bro not 500 there were 1000
Iron man of India.❤
Brits stole trillions from you? If you are sooooo great then why havent you stopped them? Thank the British for bringing you progress.
Dude dont justify colonial rule .it was bad !
I am from Sri Lanka, and i must say India under the Mughals were the richest country on Earth. During Famines, the Mughals sent relief to people. The Mughals brought unprecedented prosperity to India. India was called the golden bird under the Mughals. There was no beggar. They had fabric which was banned in France and England to protect the native industries. Thats why the Mughals are seen in a more favourable light even if they did do atrocities like destroying Hindu temples. And Libya, Iraq, Iran were all intervened by the British. They overthrew Iran’s democratic government, turned Libya the richest country in Africa to a wasteland. Britain supported and aided the invasion. NEVER compare what the British did with the Mughals. The Mughals were horrible in terms of atrocities but they did more good.
India was called Golden bird"
Capital of spirituality and trade
Birthplace of major Eastern rlgns
Look what b.r.i.t.s did
India was best in gupta empire
😊
@@drg598 I know but still. The mughals sent relief during famines to people in India. The British could care less.
As an Indian ! LOL who is this tik toker ? also . . . the overall sentiment of Indian People is always against the invaders before the British, and had just recently also shifted to the britishers.
BUT the Indian textbooks are full of Colonial history and mughal but none of the atrocities are mentioned in such a way that ignites a vengeance. On contrast people are awakening to update the text books with more ground level situations of those time as well as to include more info about the other parties in power like the Marathas, Rashtrakutas, Pala Rajputs etc.
"Overall sentiment of Indian People is always against the invaders before the British".
Please don't speak for all the Indian people when you want to vent out your hatred/bigotry and butt hurt ego.
Thanks for your racism !!
The British were worse than the Nazis. Thats also a fact. I hate how the British will deny that lol. The British will pay for their crimes. Dont need to say anything else lol.
@@wingaard idk why but why is it so hard to accept that british empire was not some gods empire that saved everyone....they were wrong as much as mughal empire but somehow just stating facts makes him (the above comment) racist?
Bro this tiktoker is an idiot Pakistani. Who thinks the partition was done by Brits by actually his grandfather voted for partition which was jinnahs idea for two nation theory. I am glad his grandfather went to pakistan. And this dude escaped pakistan only to destroy the good democracy of Britain. As an Indian I am feeling lucky.
That Thumbnail.
Finally , A Historian who truly recognises Mughals and Turkic muslim dynasties as foreign invaders and not some "Great local rulers" .In India , some specialised "experts and historians " are hell bent on giving these islamic central asian invaders an Indian color and glorifying them while at the same time hiding their atrocious activities and discrediting local rulers who actually resisted them like Maharana Pratap, Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Samrat Krishnadeva raya , Ahom Senapati Lachit Borphukan , 10th Guru Shree Guru Gobind Singh, Gurubhakt Banda Sign Bahadur , Maharaja Ranjit Singh Rana Sangha , Raja Hasan Khan Mewati ,Hakimkhan Suri, Shamshera Bahadur, Prithviraj Chauhan etc .
Mate this guy is gem. He always presents opinions which are different from the mainstream bootlickers
@@abhishekanand3067 is he
He thinks British Empire united india then what the fuck is Bharat.
He thinks india was always divided because india has some 300 language and people have different skin color.
Look how is he whitewashing British atrocities.
Typical orientalist.
Well truth be told a big part of India is populated by proto-aryans who migrated into India from... Central Asia (weird huh?) that pushed out and displaced Dravidians to the South and settled in their place.
So your point is kinda moot.
Doesn't matter if Mughal rulers where not ethnic Indians (whatever that means. Technically there is no such thing as an Indian ethnicity, race, culture or religion. It's a patchwork of hundreds if not thousands of ethnicities). India as a "Nation" was kinda invented when the English created the British Indian Empire.
In short, every nation is another nation's "invader" and not one is exempt of the sin of domination. Some rulers in history are individually worst than some others, but don't let that overshadow the achievements of the other "good" rulers that existed in every dynasty line.
sorry for not watching until the end. but I just want to comment on the thumbnail.
No one in the world considers Rome to be evil because it invaded and colonized many nations and kingdoms in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Why? because when the Romans came, they were already technologically equal. Likewise with Arab Muslims when they invaded Europe. You could even say that Muslim Arab technology at that time was more backward than European nations. therefore no one considered them evil because they fought as equals.
Meanwhile, Europeans in the 16th century when they colonized America and Asia (especially Southeast Asia), their technology and weaponry were more advanced, while they used cunning and brutal methods. as happened to the Native Americans. Likewise in Southeast Asia. they (Europeans) knew that their technology was superior, therefore they did it in such a way. even the mercator map existed to oppress and frighten people of color.
European nations in the 16th century even used racist propaganda to suppress their colonial nations. like a Mercator map. Even when they discovered that the Arabs (North Africa) had an ancient civilization, they immediately considered the Arabs to be a white race because they were so eager to claim the pyramids as the legacy of their ancestors. lol.
Thanks for being educated and wise 🦉
🇬🇧
As a BJP supporter whenever i mention these facts they call me sangi and shoelicker. I hope after watching this their woke mind will learn all these facts you said.
Because you are one
@@dharmatejareddy. If someone who says truth is sanghi then i am proud sanghi 🙏🏻
Same here bro!
@@dharmatejareddy.get a brain
@@dharmatejareddy. congee 🧢
It is called "Indian Subcontinent" for a reason. Due to the variety of different ethnic, religious and lingual groups inhabiting the Indian subcontinent, this region has behaved more like a continent than like a nation in it's recorded history. A close analogy would be imaging the continent of Europe united as a nation.
@PedroOrtega1993 na. Europe. Because most of the people of the subcontinent were united by a common political entity in the past, just like how a lot of Europe was under the Roman empire.
@@riichobamin7612 Not like Europe.
Else SovietUnion would have never collapsed.
As Bharatiya, Our history, believes, needs, comfort, our administrative concept (such as Panchayat system), social systems (Learn about Varn system), policies, law... has a sync.
You won't know that if you surround yourself with fantasies made you by fake European historians. (Back in British era they were obsessed with pushing everything within 5000year time frame to hold on to AdamEve time frame)
All this nuisance, began after Sepoy mutiny, to create gap between social classes, upper cast, lower cast, AryanInvasion, Lemuria.... Goes on...
Attempts still continue...
@@riscnx bro did you even read my comment ? Also you are REALLY mainland India-centric. Come to my home state of Arunachal. We NEVER had any "Varna" system here. Before 1947, there was no "sync" between us nd mainland India. Same goes for states like Nagaland, Mizoram and Meghalay. As well as Sikkim. And you speak about "fantasies".
And I said that Roman Empire had ruled a "lot of Europe", that is why there is a LOT of similarities between the languages and cultures of Spain, Italy, France etc, just like how their is a LOT of cultural similarities between UP, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar. People from these states can EASILY shift between them and will require minimum amount of cultural and linguistic adjustment. Whereas, say, if a Haryanavi person wants to shift to Kerela, the cultural and linguistic adjustments will be greater, and if he/she wants to shift Arunachal or Nagaland, then the cultural and linguistic adjustment will be same as moving into a different country because of the racial, historical, cultural and linguistic differences.
And that is why I was comparing India to a united Europe. Just like how their is minimal cultural and linguistic differences between the states of Hindi belt, the same applies to the countries that were integral in the Roman Empire (Italy, France, Spain and Portugal). The linguistic diffence between these countries is minimal as these languages are more or less derived from Vulgar Latin. And same for their cultures.
Next time read the comment properly, don't let your jealousy and hatred for Europe/West cloud your judgement, and learn about India properly.
@@riichobamin7612 Dude I hope you notice that Nomads and tribes don't have Varna system, in fact it's not even meant for them? Be it anywhere in India, Banjara, Gurjar, Swaran, Adi or Apatani.
I agree North east had major demographic shifts in last thousand years. In fact many fresh settlement of many nomadic groups & tribes.
But despite that settled communities of Assamese followed exact same system.
And no, Roman Empire is not what you think. Beyond the walls of Roman cities, Roman Empire was just like any other Barbarian village.
Rome had not control or local administrative muscle. Rome was just an urban centric civilisation.
India & China have always been different, we had very well established hierarchical systems. The administration structure was identical all over India, Even British operated in same structure, which is why they managed to expand so quickly, and local populations had not problems.
@@riscnx bro, you are COMPLETELY missing my point.
1. To counter your "Rome was just urban centric", so were all Indian empires that controlled majority of the Indian subcontinent. That is why there is such diversity in India. We often joke that languages change every 50KM or so in India. Why do you think that is ? It is because all pan-India empires like the Gupta, Maurya, Mughal, Maratha, British India etc were also urban centric.
2. Not all settles communities follow the Varna system in north-east. My father's tribe, the Apatani, have been settled for centuries. We have private properties and paddy fields that go back generations. And we had no clue what Varna system was until 1947.
3. You fail to see similarities between the Republic of India and a hypothetical united Europe.
(A.) You can equate the countries of the Romance languages (French, Spainish, Italian and Portuguese) with the Hindi belt. These countries are linguistically similar, just like the states of the Hindi belt where the lingua franca, i.e. Hindustani, is spoken albeit with different regional dialects.
(B.) You can compare the Slav and the Germanic people with the Dravidian group. Another major linguistic group who share more in common with their own fellow Slavic(Serbian Croatian, etc) /Germanic (the various tribes of Germany)/Dravidian (Tamils, Kannadiags, Telgu) ethnic groups than they with the Romance/Hindi belt group BUT still share lots of history together due to a large empire like the Roman (for Europe) and the Gupta, Maurya and the Mughal (for Indian subcontinent) that ruled them all together for some time atleast.
(C.) You can compare the Sami, a minority group in various nordic countries, with the various tribes of north east due to the fact that they are a minority w.r.t. population, culture and language.
Do you have any more disagreements ?
"brits colonialisme kill many people" : laugh in Mongolian (they killed 10% of the world's population). That doesn't stop me from having an adoration for these people of the steppes that nothing has stopped and from listening sometime some mongolian throat singing (just happy not to be borne in XIII century around mongol empire).
Quite true! And that's the spirit one should have while discussing history; not hurling insults and allegations at one another.
Just imagine if the entire middle east, russia, and china appealed to mongolia for reparations.
So as “a Pakistani” is this TikTok person, willing to take responsibility & make reparations for the massacres they did in Bangladesh back in the 1970s?
This man right here is probably the most honest historian on YT no bs calls everyone out and doesn't shy away from the dirty truth
Yep. He has a no bias approach which is good
Nah, Robert Sepher has that spot, but yeah, this guy is good.
@Stardust Meant To Shine elaborate
@Stardust Meant To Shine I appreciate your explanation. I believe this youtuber is trying to give a neutral(ish) perspective and simply give the correct facts on the matter (which he doesnt always do right). I dont think he is justifying the British Empire, but simply explaining that there is no point in hating Britain as a nation, as you might as well hate everyone.
Honest? No he's not.
The Image of the guy you used in 10:27 is not of Durrani. It is an Indian Actor(Ranveer Singh) playing the role of the Greatest and only Undefeated military general of the subcontinent named Peshwa Baji Rao of the Maratha Empire. He Never lost a single battle and his streak is 42 back to back victories.
LOL, i guess you don't know the history of anywhere apart from india. Google up who khalid ibn al walid was.
@@moorishwarrior341 stfu mulla. I don't care about your history. For the umpteenth time don't shove your history up everywhere. This wasn't even about you lol.
@Abhi This shows how intellectual you are just like your prime minister who identifies people by their clothes lol. Don't give too much stress on your Lil brain. I knowy history from neutral sources, not like your school books where Maharana Pratap and shivaji were the mightiest rules of the world who defeated Mughals🤣🤣
@@moorishwarrior341 Bro you serious? That's clearly Hindu flags behind him . Saffron in colour and triangle shaped
@@rrajputofficial5024 I was replying to the original post that peshwa baji Rao wasn't the only undefeated general in the subcontinent as claimed by the guy
It’s especially annoying me, how, taking advantage of all the benefits of Western civilization, they have the opportunity to criticize and blame it... go to India and enjoy life there!
They could but the British fucked everything up to even let Indians enjoy anything. I mean it was the greatest source of revenue for that nation so...your welcome i guess?
History is never black and white. Some individuals are portrayed as always evil, while others are depicted as saints. In fact, South India (Kerala) was saved by the British from a Muslim invader called Tipu Sultan. The British were allies with the princely state of Travancore and played a role in protecting Kerala on two occasions: once during the invasion by Tipu Sultan and again during the 1921 Mappila Uprising . Without British intervention, Kerala might have become a Muslim-majority state.
I've found that the vast majority of "historians" don't say how muslims wanted to partition India, not the British.
Yes, partition was terrible and millions died and were ethnically cleansed from their homes, but no one asks and answers:
What would have occurred if there was NO partition?
I think the resulting war/s would have been far, far worse.
As an Indian you're right, the partition was needed or else india would have become another yugoslavia
you really think that? India has more than 200 million muslims still, are they still fighting against each other? Except politicians, I don't think anyone really hates muslims except because they are viewed as Pakistani and the media constantly discriminates against them. Muslim League was created by handful of landlord and Nawabs who felt that THEY wouldn't be represented, not the majority of the population. It's same as the Russian revolution where not the oppressed and underrepresented people fight for equality and justice,, but a handful of radicals that imposed their ideology to everyone.
@@CoolManCoolMan123 you're out of touch with reality
@@glitchboi3537 tell me how am I out of touch with reality?
@@CoolManCoolMan123 India still has Muslims left. What about Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh? They are barely existent there and are declining rapidly.
Without the partition, there would have been events like Rawalpindi riots, Noakhali Massacre and Direct Action Day, and probably even a civil war.
Thank you for teasing out all the silly prejudice contained in that young man’s rant. He’s merely trying to conjure up some ‘identity’, but in a very puerile way.
Mughals did not steal the resources from the native and sent it to another country. British did that. India was one of the most prosperous country during the mughal period.
Mughals and britishers were bad for India. Atleast Britishers didn't kill us our religious believes.
This person is completely speaking truth
Being an Indian, I agree with you. important things to point out, every empire is evil, in past, it is in present and it will be in future.
Yeah, ALL empires, no exceptions
No there is a difference between degree of evil. Islam categorically teaches non believers as worse than animals. Same can't be said about hindu or Buddhist belief. Hindus welcomed even Jewish and persian refugees. Has any islamic country welcomed any non muslim refuge, thry don't even allow muslims from other sect.
He said only maurya United india, what about Maratha?? He just lied. Brits got it from them. Not from “broken” country. Having kingdoms isn’t broken. It’s normal. Europe has broken countries by languages even today.
Even with major differences, india is more united, even back then, they had relative peace amongst different people. It was NOT game of thrones like world back then. He just lied.
And he’s got no idea about d 45 trillion calculations. He was taught that Raj gave india modernity, not decimated textile, academic, naval/shipping, metallurgy industries. No mention of ethnic cleansing of people by destroying d gurukul/temple related industries. No mention of wiping out nature and species in india. No mention of forcing Hindumisic propaganda to neuter entire civilization over d century. And on and on… He’s obviously clueless.
@Stardust Meant To Shine No he's not.
evil? this lie of racism was and still with us so he's thinking what happened in india stopped that still the trend today. ' now they changed to more confusion they don't know anything else racism is like a runaway train . look when they had to leave mozambique did the destroy the infrastructure of the country that how they operate its not a matter of countries suffered by conquering nation. this criminal belief of racism don't want the world to live a normal life just for their benefits. when you had your education and a nice life through racism you can be bias and if you were always in a subservient or brought up in that environment as person that from india you will agree even if you live with the racists for so long
so true, one side they acknowledge British colonization but completely ignores Islamic invasion in India , they were more evil for natives 😑😑
Yeah. But India's economy was not reduced to ashes compared to the British. The Mughals actually helped our economy thrive coz they opted to stay there instead of looting it and going back. But the British wiped India off like nothing and used it to constructs their cities. And killing and torturing was on both sides. Britain made sure that India could not grow up again but to their surprise it did.
@@y0y010 ....Britishers came here to loot only not to serve people everybody knows that .Islamic invasion not only include mughals but it happened in India for thousands of years from (712AD by mohammad bin qasim to 18 th century aurangzeb) . Were those all opulence of mughal era for people ?absolutely NO .Those all building n forts were made by given tax jizya from non muslims . During the construction of Taj mahal there was a famine which results three consecutive staple crop failure cause plague n leading to intense hunger n disease about 3 million people died in gujrat in 1631 where another million died around in ahmednagar and over all death was 7.4 million by late 1631 and that time shahjahan was busy building Taj mahal for his wife memorial. Britishers loot n went back but those islamic invader captured our land enjoyed the luxury on given tax ,force their religion n faith on natives ,destroyed universities ,temples , made hindu or buddhist women sex slave on the name of religion only ....britishers also loot but they didn't destroyed temples n made church on them they atrocities were on Indian not for hindus only . they also introduce railways to India but that doesn't mean that they did it for natives n same logic goes for mughals
@@y0y010 Brown people can not understand the concept of per capita
Calling the mughal empire "friendly" is like calling the british empire a world successful famine ender.
It was
@@apollocreed5391 was actually talking about the famines but saw your point, thank you reminding me to correct the sarcasm😆
@@mvn514 yes I knew you were talking about the famine, bengal presumably. What about the famine?
@@apollocreed5391 nothing much. People were partying and dancing and singing and eating to their heart's content. Wiston Churchill is the hero of India and Bangladesh.
@@whentheimposterissus8376 good as he saved lives in Bengal.
Spreading either Islam OR Christianity are both terrible things to do. Spread REASON if anything must be spread, like butter on that bread.
Revoke his visa so he has now a reason to hate lol
paxtanys getout of britain is number 1 trend in UK now
Yeah, his ancestors voluntarily came. If he doesn't like it, he can go back
He doesn't have a visa
@@nledaig then kick him
@@whitezombie10 Why? I don't go around kicking dafties. He was born in the UK.
Shame, fear, and anxiety is interfering in the critical study of history. One of the most important topics is being obscured and it’s robbing everyone of their past.
Not to mention, when Britain occupied India, they MAINTAINED PEACE amongst the various nations present there. Once Britain was forced to leave after WWII, that peace ENDED and MILLIONS of Indians, Muslims, and Sikhs (as well as others) died because Britain was no longer enforcing peaceful co-existence amongst the inhabitants. :/ Britain's occupation literally SAVED lives...
Bitcchhh are u serious right now ??? 😂
British killed million of Indian
It's great to hear the truth about history.
It's the same thing with British history concerning slavery.
We were told that we were the biggest baddest enslavers the world has ever known.
In truth, Britain was the first country to abolish slavery.
Slavery in all its ugly glory still exists in some parts of Africa.
Also, ISIS revived slavery ( plight of the Yazidis!) Because they believe that's how it should be according to 1,400 years ago.
That's not even mentioning the Royal Navy's West Africa Squadron, which patrolled the Atlantic and captured slave ships, freeing 150,000 or so slaves in the process. True it was inefficient and disease was rampant, but what can you expect when, for the longest time, they were pretty much alone in doing this and had next to nothing to gain from this?
Well you seem to be proud of that huhh? Just go and listen to British officers comments in their atrocities ya india wasn't heaven before british but Britishers created hell out of Bharat and
1: Britishers created slavery in India my guy .Those artisans ,ship builders ,metal workers were forced to work on fields
2 india had to build the railway system by paying double money to Britishers.
Glad there is people out there setting these "weekend historians" straight!
Not even a "weekender", more like a boozy Friday night
@@willbass2869 yeah
the weekend historian is history legends, it is shocking for him to make a historical rant video where he gets so many basic facts wrong. the tiktoker is definitely more cringe and inaccurate, history legends is only a short distance behind him
@@jewishmafiosiandganglord6930 3 likes btw
Worked at a Northern India style restaurant when I was in my early 20's as a dishwasher. The staff were all basically family, and extremely kind to me and pretty much everyone else. Except one guy who worked the tandoor who was valuable as an employee, but had Muslim family from Pakistan. They were MUCH nicer to me, a white college aged kid, then him. At times, their rants at him got very fiery, which of course I didn't understand the language but got the vibe. I figured it was about his work, but eventually was let on it had much more to do background, family, religion, etc. Very powerful introduction into a divide I'd never really thought of
Their mindset of raping and killing hindus only because their holy books says kill the pegans and invade their land (quran chapter 9 verse 6 and many more).........and history of hindus heing raped and inslaved massacred are the reasons.....we have hard feeling for isl@m and their's radical followers .
So you see, the problem
It had to do more with Post partition politics and the politicisation of Muslims by pakistan. Pakistan used religion as a justifying tool to do everything against India. Even in kashmir they used religion as a motive to invade.
@TT vice versa.
maybe because hindus were massacred outright by the islamic empires - I mean why should I feel nnice to a minority which gets appeased in every single elction - have made their own sharia law as civil law . their descendants in india had ancestors who voted for pakistan , they support pakistan in cricket match . why on earth should I care if they are hated coz they deserved it
If it wasn’t for the British India would’ve never been united north and south and truth be told it most likely would’ve become a part of the Middle East Muslim state country
Both the islamic invaders and british colonizers destroyed India. What you get wrong is that many islamic invaders were defeated multiple times before getting any success. The Marathas also managed to unite most of India. Infact they were ruling over 70% of India by the time the brits came over. If the british had been a little late, they would not have been able to colonise India because they would no longer be able to employ divide and rule between Hindu and muslims kingdoms since most of India would have been back in the Hindu kingdom. Both the colonizers looted, exploited and destroyed India in there own ways. The british induced and engineered famines killed tens of millions of people. The British era is significant because during this period a very large number of famines struck India.[2][3] There is a vast literature on the famines in colonial British India.[4] The mortality in these famines was excessively high and in some may have been increased by British policies.[5] The mortality in the Great Bengal famine of 1770 was between one and 10 million;[6] the Chalisa famine of 1783-1784, 11 million; Doji bara famine of 1791-1792, 11 million; and Agra famine of 1837-1838, 800,000.[7] In the second half of the 19th-century large-scale excess mortality was caused by: Upper Doab famine of 1860-1861, 2 million; Great Famine of 1876-1878, 5.5 million; Indian famine of 1896-1897, 5 million; and Indian famine of 1899-1900, 1 million.[8] The first major famine of the 20th century was the Bengal famine of 1943, which affected the Bengal region during wartime; it was one of the major South Asian famines in which anywhere between 1.5 million and 3 million people died. India's contribution to world GDP before brits arrived : 25 % ( also the India was the richest country of the world for 1600 years by then, the longest for ANY country ever, the record still stands ).
After brits left : 2%
Famines in India in the 2000 years before brits arrived : 17
Famines that occurred under british rule of 200 years : around 25
Here's a list of some of them : The British era is significant because during this period a very large number of famines struck India.[2][3] There is a vast literature on the famines in colonial British India.[4] The mortality in these famines was excessively high and in many cases it has been increased by British policies.[5] The mortality in the Great Bengal famine of 1770 was between one and 10 million;[6] the Chalisa famine of 1783-1784, 11 million; Doji bara famine of 1791-1792, 11 million; and Agra famine of 1837-1838, 800,000.[7] In the second half of the 19th-century large-scale excess mortality was caused by: Upper Doab famine of 1860-1861, 2 million; Great Famine of 1876-1878, 5.5 million; Indian famine of 1896-1897, 5 million; and Indian famine of 1899-1900, 1 million.[8] The first major famine of the 20th century was the Bengal famine of 1943, which affected the Bengal region during wartime; it was one of the major South Asian famines in which anywhere between 1.5 million and 3 million people died.[9]
The total number of people who died because of this Famines alone and in India alone goes over tens of millions of people. If you add to this the total number of people who died by any cause that was a result of brits or their policies in all of their colonies then the number easily crosses hundreds of millions. Hence, the lady is correct on this point. Infact, the last great famine under british ruled India was the great Bengal famine of 1943, of which multiple photos and videos you can find in the internet including on UA-cam. When multiple concerned british officials wrote to churchil how his actions have created the most devastating famine of the world in the 20th centuary, he replied, " why hasn't Gandhi died yet ".
India's contributions to the world : The Hindu numerical system, also known as the decimal base system which forms the basis of mathematics and is the system we use today, and which may as well be the greatest invention ever in the history of humanity, Madhava, an Indian mathematician who founded the Kerala school of Mathematics almost discovered calculus over 200 years before newton or leibnitz were even born, and a LOTS AND LOTS of other fundamental contributions to maths, physics, logic, philosophy, biology, etc. India is one of the 3 earliest, oldest civilization, namely, the Harrappan civilization (India), the Masopotamian civilization ( modern day iraq) , the Egyptian civilization. Which one of these is the oldest is highly debatable and a topic of ongoing research, but India was the most extensive and widespread civilization of these all. Ancient Indians invented/ discovered many things some of which are, soap, shampoo, buttons, diamonds, steel, city planning, drainage systems, underground drainiage systems, the world's first port, the game of chess, etc. The first language in the world is also an Indian language ( one of these, Sanskrit or Tamil, both Indian languages). India has also made tremendous contributions in the modern times in STEM and almost every field. So yeah Both of them destroyed India as much as they could but I am happy that now India is stronger then both the muslims world and britain combined. I don't hold any grudge against modern day brits or arabs for that, but I just want them and my fellow Indians to not forget what happened.