Excellent message. The teaching of God's Word is so very rare in our churches it is so good to hear it and be blessed by it. Thank you for being faithful !
Very good message, yes it is rare to hear this kind in the churches and I am praying for more churches worldwide to embrace the truth once again....I certainly needed to hear this! Blessings abundant!
I absolutely loved and so needed to hear this message!! El Shaddai = walk before me in innocence / Israel's beauty was El Shaddai among them, cleansing us with oil is God's spirit upon us!
Although Jesus was Jewish, he did not fulfill any of the other Messianic criteria. An examination of the contradictory accounts of Jesus’ genealogy demonstrates this. Specifically, the New Testament claims that Jesus did not have a physical father. The Bible, however, clearly states that a person’s genealogy and tribal membership is transmitted exclusively through one’s physical father (Numbers 1:18, Jeremiah 33:17). Therefore, Jesus cannot possibly be a descendant of the tribe of Judah nor of King David and King Solomon. There are even further problems with any attempts to use the Bible to prove Jesus’ genealogy through Joseph, the husband of Mary. For the New Testament claims that Joseph was a descendant of King Jeconiah, who in the Bible was cursed to never have a descendant “sitting on the throne of David and ruling any more in Judah” (Jeremiah 22:30). Joseph’s genealogy, even if it were transmittable to Jesus, would only serve to further disqualify Jesus as the Messiah. Finally, there is the problem of the contradictory accounts of Jesus’ genealogy in Matthew, Chapter 1 and Luke, Chapter 3. The common Christian explanation of this contradiction claims that Luke’s genealogy is that of Jesus’ mother, Mary. However, this is unfounded, even according to the Greek original. In addition, it has already been established that genealogy is transferred solely through the father, making this attempted explanation completely irrelevant. Even if one could trace one’s genealogy through one’s mother, there would be the additional problem in that Luke 3:31 lists Mary as a descendant of David through Nathan, Solomon’s brother, and not through Solomon himself as is prophesied in I Chronicles 22:10. All other messianic criteria have obviously not been fulfilled, either during Jesus’ time or since. Any Christian claims that these final criteria will be fulfilled in a “Second Coming” are irrelevant because the concept of the Messiah coming twice has no scriptural basis.
Excellent message. The teaching of God's Word is so very rare in our churches it is so good to hear it and be blessed by it. Thank you for being faithful !
Very good message, yes it is rare to hear this kind in the churches and I am praying for more churches worldwide to embrace the truth once again....I certainly needed to hear this! Blessings abundant!
I absolutely loved and so needed to hear this message!! El Shaddai = walk before me in innocence / Israel's beauty was El Shaddai among them, cleansing us with oil is God's spirit upon us!
Although Jesus was Jewish, he did not fulfill any of the other Messianic criteria. An examination of the contradictory accounts of Jesus’ genealogy demonstrates this. Specifically, the New Testament claims that Jesus did not have a physical father. The Bible, however, clearly states that a person’s genealogy and tribal membership is transmitted exclusively through one’s physical father (Numbers 1:18, Jeremiah 33:17). Therefore, Jesus cannot possibly be a descendant of the tribe of Judah nor of King David and King Solomon.
There are even further problems with any attempts to use the Bible to prove Jesus’ genealogy through Joseph, the husband of Mary.
For the New Testament claims that Joseph was a descendant of King Jeconiah, who in the Bible was cursed to never have a descendant “sitting on the throne of David and ruling any more in Judah” (Jeremiah 22:30). Joseph’s genealogy, even if it were transmittable to Jesus, would only serve to further disqualify Jesus as the Messiah.
Finally, there is the problem of the contradictory accounts of Jesus’ genealogy in Matthew, Chapter 1 and Luke, Chapter 3. The common Christian explanation of this contradiction claims that Luke’s genealogy is that of Jesus’ mother, Mary. However, this is unfounded, even according to the Greek original. In addition, it has already been established that genealogy is transferred solely through the father, making this attempted explanation completely irrelevant. Even if one could trace one’s genealogy through one’s mother, there would be the additional problem in that Luke 3:31 lists Mary as a descendant of David through Nathan, Solomon’s brother, and not through Solomon himself as is prophesied in I Chronicles 22:10.
All other messianic criteria have obviously not been fulfilled, either during Jesus’ time or since. Any Christian claims that these final criteria will be fulfilled in a “Second Coming” are irrelevant because the concept of the Messiah coming twice has no scriptural basis.
Awesome.. Amen.
Amen.
good very well
Legenda em Português?🙏