I Solved A Homemade Functional Equation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2023
  • 🤩 Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (aplusbi)
    Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! 🧡🥰🎉🥳🧡
    / @sybermathshorts
    / @aplusbi
    ⭐ Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
    My merch → teespring.com/stores/sybermat...
    Follow me → / sybermath
    Subscribe → ua-cam.com/users/SyberMath?sub...
    ⭐ Suggest → forms.gle/A5bGhTyZqYw937W58
    If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
    intent/tweet?text...
    #functionalequations #algebra #functions
    via @UA-cam @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
    PLAYLISTS 🎵 :
    Number Theory Problems: • Number Theory Problems
    Challenging Math Problems: • Challenging Math Problems
    Trigonometry Problems: • Trigonometry Problems
    Diophantine Equations and Systems: • Diophantine Equations ...
    Calculus: • Calculus

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @ryanstaal3233
    @ryanstaal3233 7 місяців тому +2

    Solved it in a few seconds. Just substitute x=-f(y)/2 and you get that f(y)=4y+c for a constant c. Plugging this in gives that only c=0 works.

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  7 місяців тому

      Wow! That was quick

  • @scottleung9587
    @scottleung9587 7 місяців тому +1

    Nice job!

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  7 місяців тому +1

      Thank you! Cheers!

  • @JohnSmith-mz7dh
    @JohnSmith-mz7dh 7 місяців тому

    There is another way. I let y=0 and differentiated it once on both sides. 2f’(2x+f(0)=8. f’(2x+f(0))=4. We can let some variable t=2x+f(0), so f’(t)=4. f(t)=4t+c. We can immediately see that c=0 since there is no constant term on the right hand side.
    I think it’s obvious that f is differentiable. We know that f’(t)=4, no possibility for being undefined! I’m not sure exactly how to prove this more rigourisly however.

  • @srirajan1933
    @srirajan1933 7 місяців тому

    You are great, @SyberMath! You create compelling content for us each day!! You remind me of my high school math teacher, Daniel Dawson, who inspired so many of us in the late 1970s to learn mathematical thinking. Quick thought: if you replace f(2x + f(y)) on LHS with f(2x + 2f(y)), or more exotic with powers and logs, such as f(2x + f^2(y)) so that your substitution method does *not* cancel f(y) on LHS to isolate f(y) by itself, this gets tricky... will give it a try and see where this goes. Love your work, buddy! Thank you immensely for helping educate (or re-educate) all of us!!

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  7 місяців тому

      Thank you for the kind words! ❤️

  • @mystychief
    @mystychief 7 місяців тому

    It looks as if f(x) is linear, so suppose f(x) = ax + b. There is twice an f in the first equation, so twice fill in f(x) = ax + b, you get 2ax+af(y)+b = 2ax + a²y + ab + b = 8x + 16y. This gives 2a=8 or a=4 and b=0. So f(x) = 4x (a²y=16y also fits).

  • @florianbuerzle2703
    @florianbuerzle2703 7 місяців тому

    Solved it also in seconds: substitute x = x/2 - f(y)/2, then you will get f(x) + 4f(y) = 4x +16y which is solved by f(x) = 4x 😊

  • @andirijal9033
    @andirijal9033 7 місяців тому

    f(y) = -x so y = inverse of (-x) and f(x) = ax + b

  • @kianmath71
    @kianmath71 7 місяців тому

    F(x) = 4x

  • @giuseppemalaguti435
    @giuseppemalaguti435 7 місяців тому

    f(x)=4x

  • @alextang4688
    @alextang4688 7 місяців тому +2

    Put x=0, y=0, get f(f(0))=0
    Put x=0, y=f(0), get f(0)=0
    Put x=2a, y=0, get f(a)=4a answer. 😉😉😉😉😉😉