Ever see that "Pinky and the Brain" episode "Brainwashed"? Part of it involved a land of hats. Sure, it was really just a bunch of people (and lab mouse; yes, just one, as Pinky's stupidity made him immune) forcibly given amnesia and made to think they were the hats they wore, but it was still hilarious and fitting of the theme.
*Hills, mushrooms, clouds, flowers, practically everything in the mushroom kingdom has eyes* Makes sense to me! *A hat has eyes* OMFG SO UNREALISTIC WHAT IS THIS
I like that it would've made sense to him had Cappy been the only living hat, but the fact there's a species of living hats from which Cappy comes from somehow makes it confusing.
Also, unrealistic is a really stupid argument for a videogame that's not supposed to be realistic. I mean, you're an italian plumber doing your way to rescue the princess of a kingdom of mushroom head guys to fight a giant turtle with a white tuxedo.
“It disconnects the player from being immersed” Yes because my first thought when jumping into a Mario game is worrying about how immersed I am into my role as a super agile plumber with a silly mustache.
0/10, shirt is too orange. And the person in the video, didn't even get a graphics boost from the last video... Still the same old formula used for the video; Find bad reviews, make a good script and start recording. Wish the video was more like Tetris...
Red Roxy I hope you're thinking something like this - "Comment is so bad it made me spit out my coffee but to bring ratings up I am rating it 10/10" 😉🍵
Sage of Fire There was so much traveling around that you had to do, and you had to go those shrines which didn't have much action and were very boring for me. Everybody seems to love the game, so I assume it's just that I'm into more of a constant action thing, which isnt very present in Zelda except for the few parts with a lot of combat.
Sage of Fire It was actually the first Zelda game i ever tried besides the first one (which I didnt enjoy much either) because the nature of the series never seemed that interesting to me
BOTW in Master Mode was still easy. The only "Challenge" was the Master Sword Trials, because enemies regen health (which imo was dumb). If they took out the regen, made AI smarter, and made it so you take double damage, then it could be just a little bit harder. Otherwise, I'm still fighting Lynels at 3 hearts. So long as you can dodge and parry, you can kill anything.... There is no incentive to get hearts over stamina, because killing things faster is much more efficient than being able to *maybe* take one more hit.... In short, remove/rework the counter system to be less lenient. But hey, that's just my opinion. It definitely had it's challenge when I first started the game.
But where is sonic? I was promised a sonic game, it clearly says "Mario" in the title so therefore sonic should also be present. I demand a refund immediately.
It has no content actually. Micro Transactions are the AMIIBOs, say whatever you want, but it's a FACT. Yeah I agree that there are too much color, I mean my eyes literally bleed from watching the screen of my TV which's has a very low brightness. Other than that it's easy af and dull af.
The True Mario Fan it's not an evil shitty micro transaction if you can still unlock the stuff in game without ever owning an amiibo. After saving peach you can buy (with in game coins) or collect power moons in order to unlock all the wedding costumes in game. Heck, when you first land on the moon, cappy gives the costume you get for tapping the wedding mario amiibo for free, no crazy cap shop needed. And don't say "oh it's going to take years to unlock the wedding costumes!!11 its just like darth vader in battle front: either waste 40+ hours of your life grinding for him or pay" as everyone is saying, moons are extremely easy to collect. You can also buy them in groups of ten in the shop with in game coins and I find coins quite plentiful in Super mario odyessy. Amiibo are completely optional and i feel like this would still be the way to unlock the wedding costumes in a world where amiibo were never invented at all.
the fun part about this reviews is that people calls this game a repetitive formula or nothing new here, when im pretty sure they get excited about every new call of duty or first person shooter announced. Xd
OMG CALL OF DUTY 36!!!!! What? Mario? Come on, every single game is just basically a new map pack of the last. Me: You literally just spent 398.99 on 23 map packs for Call of Duty.....
I do not like mario 64. It's just a 3D version of Mario Bros and it adds no originality to the franchise. The paintings as world portals was a good idea but was executed terribly. All Mario does is run, jump and collect stars. It was too easy and the final boss had such a simple mechanic. 1/10. BTW THIS COMMENT IS A PARODY OF THESE REVIEWS o3o
Mother 3 was pretty dark and a depressing game. Sometimes its not really "All ages" considering how dark it is. Thats the only nintendo game that is necessarily "All ages".
Rawrrwrarararrarararaw. Good point, I haven't actually played the game or seen the end so I'm not one to talk about it BUT if kids under 10 play GTA V, they're probably gonna play a Mario game despite how it's gonna have a dark ending
Mother 3 is COMPLETELY different than GTA V, if GTA is somebody's favorite game, they may not like mother 3's play style. But mother 3 is the best game ever in my opinion. I just like it's play style more than other games.
Rawrrwrarararrarararaw. Sorry i was just using GTA as an example of a game that is definitely NOT for children but they play it anyways. Also I have never played nor seen Mother 3, only Mother 2 so I don't have much I can say about that
"to justify a worthless system" Sir I'm sorry but a gaming system that can be both portable and a home console is basically the best thing Nintendo has ever come up with. I'm not saying this to be a kiss ass to nintendo but it's fairly true.
lmao ok, so they make a console less powerful than its predecessor but it's portable and overpriced, so all of a sudden it's the best console of the generation. Face it kids, it's not a console if it's a handheld with a dock
Kanus Cochranus 1st off if it's not a console then wtf is it? 2nd you literally called it a console in the first sentence of your comment... Also it's obviously not less powerful than its predecessor if you can play shit like Skyrim and Doom on the go. The fact that you can play those 2 games on a portable console is quite astounding in itself.
Have you seen the downgrade on DOOM? lmao ok bud. Also you never really picked up on the fact I was just taking the piss out of the switch, so the validity of my comment isn't necessarily something all that important. However the experience of DOOM on the Switch is vastly inferior to other consoles with a locked framerate and marred visuals that make it seem choppy in comparison to other consoles, so no, it's not astounding at all since you can play graphically intensive games on mobile phones which don't have dedicated graphics. y'all nintendrones can't take any criticism lmao.
most of these reviews looks like it came from "edgy" gamers who I believe are really confused as to what are they looking for in a certain game. I'm not a die hard Mario fan, the only Mario game I played are the original super Mario, Mario 64, and Mario kart 8. but seeing the user reviews at metacritic just makes me... mad. so I want to help address some of it. 1) all game titles are all the same with a little bit of added formula (I.E the hat in Mario odyssey, ship battles in assassins creed 4, etc.), in fact Mario is the most diverse character out there that have racing games, party games, sports games, even educational games, and more. so stating that "there's nothing new" (even though the "new" gimmick in this game here is the hat) in a game is a negative factor are biased as hell. 2) NOT ALL GAME ARE SUPPOSED TO BE CHALLENGING OR REALISTIC. I think Nintendo already stated this when they (badly) marketed the Wii U to kids that they make games not as a way for players to escape reality into a new one, but as a way to have odd, creative, weird, and FUN experiences in a game, that's why their games are rarely realistic and are more family friendly (or kiddie as some would say). The last challenging Mario games that I've seen or known about is the original super Mario, and it was challenging due to it's limitations at the time. 3) I mean the game is about plumbers fighting against a giant freaking turtle that kidnapped a princess of a mushroom people kingdom and the plumber get paid by coins inside a small (but the same size as his body) brick cube that he have to break, and THE WEIRDEST THING that you can think of is the alien hat?? I'm not saying that the review that gives good score are in the right and all bad ones are wrong, reviews should be seen by the details of their analysis of the game. most reviews are dumb because good and bad reviews are all saying the same thing, it's just a matter of the reviewer personal experience/ problems with the game that'll influence the score (most of the time biased), and review scores will attract assholes and band-wagoners.
For some reason, I'm torn on whether or not you spelled all those names incorrectly on purpose for effect, or you genuinely dunced the whole comment, in which both instances I tip my hat to you sir.
Jibrail Laksmono As overrated as Mario is it seems like u either love the game or dont like it. I dont like this Mario, Zelda is far better game but even thats mediocre to me. I say that to say this because Im having a terrible time with my switch. If ur not into Nintendo's IPs the switch isnt really something to have right now. N how much can u milk a plumber. I think its time to put Mario to rest n start making a new successor
Woah, I get that people should respect each others' opinions, but this is way out of wack. For starters, a new IP? Mario hasn't died out in any form or fashion. For the past several decades, Mario has been a forefront in the genres he's served it. From 2D to 3D platformers, to all his various spin-offs, it's incredible what Nintendo can do with a single IP. If you don't like Odyessey, chances are you just don't like the 3D platformer genre. Unless you can give me an indepth analysis of this game, compared with another platformer akin to Mario (which is a giant task), then ok, I see your point, but the only 2 things I can assume from your comment is: The Switch sucks cause it either feels bad or it's not working properly Mario is simply overrated, no other criticisms. Both cases are bad sure, but both weren't in the realm of decision for Nintendo. It's not like they can influence your thinking in such a dramatic sense, that's just your attitude, that's that.
Mason Shen I like the switch its just I dont have anything on it I would like to play right now until Xenoblade. Ratchet n Clank in my opinion was a better game. Better storyline, more n better gameplay mechanics, great level up system, graphically better, challenging bosses with better design, great platforming with the use of different skills n tools, great variety of weapons, n even though Ratchet doesnt have as much charm as Mario he has way more character.
I think Mario Odyssey was meant to be easy and forgiving in order to encourage exploration. The reason deaths only take 10 coins, the reason moons count even after death, the reason there are checkpoints everywhere. They want you to explore every nook and cranny of the worlds. They want you try to see if you can do that crazy risky jump or see if you can go down that narrow path. If they game reset you every time you died, exploring would be so risky and time consuming that it wouldn’t be worth it to take the jump.
3:24 Good to know difficulty is the only way of measuring a game's quality. 5:59 "This game was literally built for children" No, it was build for one specific person. His name was "Shit Sherlock", first name "No". 8:02 Actually, I think they're implying that they're merging the two scores together. A 5/5 and a 0/5 make for a 5/10. But honestly, that's even dumber. Why would you rate a game based on its fanbase? 8:21 Again, it makes total sense to rate a game lower specifically because everyone else likes it. 12:11 "If you liked this video, then why don't you give it a 10 or a 0 depending on some arbitrary factor?" Isn't that how youtube's likes and dislikes work anyways?
blekksverd for the last point it's no, because before there was an actual star rating method, there it's just : if you like a thumb up and etc (it's not necessary and doesn't influence your channel even thought now every one like sgit and lies so they put thumbs up to watch mojo and others)... if it was a rating like before you could see the rating below the video minia, so if you had bad ratings it influence your channel critics because the same people can walk to others of your videos and lower your ratings even if your videos are excellent like games on appstores on phones (even if i say it again, people of today love shit and shitty copies of other games, exemple : mario, candy crush, sonic...)
+Tycho Wozniaki See, that's the problem with youtube comments. I can't read them in a sarcastic voice to make the intentions clearer. But no, obviously that doesn't make sense.
@@maverickay5807 0/10 at best. I mean come on, a plumber named Mario? I've never seen anything so dumb in a video game, I expect more from Sega next time
@@skillwaffles9858 it's a lot of fun but suffers from less direction than sunshine and galaxy by making power moons just random pick ups a lot of the time. It never feels like a Star did. Levels are big but that doesn't always mean better. They are all hit or miss. Some hit wonderful and others don't really work.
why the hell do people think the challenge comes from the enemies and bosses? it's a platformer, the challenge comes from the level design, which I think this game does pretty well as far as difficulty scaling goes. There is a serious difference between cascade kingdom and bowser's kingdom. Bowser's kingdom has bottomless pits and lava and both are instakills, tons of bombs and the enemy you capture in bowser's kingdom is used well with the design of the level and with said enemy you are constantly hopping around above bottomless pits and other hazards. If there were anything I'd complain about, I guess the levels are pretty basic? I'd love to have had a nicer variety of levels, maybe a ghost house would be a nice settings instead of having two water levels. More creative settings like cap kingdom would've been cool or maybe have had the ruined kingdom be a full level instead of just the settings for a boss fight (LOVE the visuals in that level, it clashes with mario in a good way.)
regardless of whether or not you think the game is hard, there is absolutely no arguing that bowser's kingdom is flat out more hazardous and more difficult than cascade kingdom.
The difficulty from enemies is nullified in a 3d space because you can circumvent them and they become a nonissue. The only way to make them a threat is to force the player to deal with them and that usually means halting progression, leading to a game that isn't very fun to play because your progression would be constantly halted to deal with these things that the game wants you to perceive as threatening. That actual platforming is way, way more inviting to develop difficulty around and can lead to fun and interesting navigation while scaling the difficulty properly through the experience.
Since there are no objective truths when it comes to design philosophy I'm just going to say that both sides of this exchange are gonna show some subjectivity. That being said, I believe completely differently about what type of difficulty a 3d platformer should try to cultivate. I think making combat more complex takes away from the core experience and would just be a secondary obstacle to the average player and just come out as an annoyance. I think the margin of enemy variety you can make and have fun fights with in the 3d platformer setting is pretty small. Instead I think enemies should be placed to complement the platforming, or even have a mechanic within them that enhances/cripples your platforming ability. This game actually does this quite well with the capture mechanic and non-capturable enemies in general. The up-roots help you get to hard to reach areas and the birds in bowser kingdom (forgot their name, forgive me :C) help you navigate over large pits and tall walls. And the guys that slam the blocks down in bowser's kingdom (again, not familiar with the name) give you some platforms to work with if you choose to. If your game is primarily a platformer, I think you should use all the tools available to enhance platforming. The same applies to combat oriented games and I think any mechanic introduced should complement the mechanics they're working with and not be two different playstyles packed into a single game. I think enemies should be tools to utilize and not one of the primary hazards you use to scale difficulty.
Tbh the people who complain it's too easy haven't even played the game (or at least not far enough)...Some of the post game moons definitely aren't easy at all. The game forces you to learn how to make good use of cappy for some of them.
And then there is people who complain that it is too easy but they go over and play cuphead and complain it is too hard...people will just try to fuck everyone up
"Nope, every good game needs to be only beatable by the MLG players! I remember when just beating a game was an achievement!" Yeah, those folks need to chill.
@@codo8584 its evil .... I struggle with platformers so when donkey kong tropical freeze I was a bit terrified... but when it takes me vack to the beginning of the level that is much more reasonable
@@tayyababebo9782 The Lost Levels is more frustrating than hard, and is just a bad game. Mario bros 3 is a difficult game but has some of the best level design in any mario game and offers hours of entertainment
This is what an edgy 12 year old would say: "This game sucks ass because there are no guns and swearing, how can a game be cool if you can't do that?" This is what a 90's kid would say: "This game is bad because it wasn't made in the 90's and it didn't live up to all of my extremely specific requirements!" This is what an SJW would say: "This game is racist, sexist, and homophobic because I say it is!"
Those reviews in a nutshell : *It's not a [Insert any video game company that is not Nintendo] game so this sucks [Insert stupid reason so they can call it a 'review']*
"This isn't an Xbox One/Ps4 game, 0 stars! Oh, you thought I was done? (Insert paragraph about how the game is too easy) (Insert paragraph about how the game is boring) (And the special haters insert a paragraph about how the game is not 4k) (And finally, some insults to Nintendo) All said and done." 0 out of 19 found this helpful.
Are you implying that people who don’t like the game for some reason or another are wrong? Let them dislike it it doesn’t affect you so why do you care?
King Aardvark : They are talking about review bombing. People who give games 0/10 without even playing the game. Sony fans for unknown reasons are the worst for it, they have heaps of good games supposedly so why they do this is weird.
UtherSwagBringer cause yoshi gets boring to use after every five puzzles This is coming from a guy who loves the lil guy and used him all the time in SM World
The game's difficulty was never the point of Mario Odyssey. It's more about taking in the sights and sounds of these wonderfully weird environments and sounds and using Cappy to find a creative way to collect the copious amounts of Power Moons. If you really are looking to Mario for a challenge, then you play Lost Levels or the insane amounts of Kaizo-like levels in Mario Maker.
Yeah I think the whole put-yourself-through-hell thing has a time and a place, but don't forget the fun in exploring! The shiba inus that play catch? The giant champagne glasses? THE ENDGAME WITH BOWSER?
Orion Icarus the only thing that was a challenge for me was the beach volleyball moon. Even though there was only 1 challenging moon, I have still played it for over 130 hours and have fun every time I pick up the game.
0/10 you can't play as isabelle from animal Crossing which as an animal Crossing player is very disappointing (this is a lie, non of this is true Im just joking around lol)
Noa Lindqvist yeah. Was it intended as a pun? Sorry, my mind is a little slow today. I haven't been getting enough sleep lately. I've been staying up a lot later than I should, because I need to study for my finals.
Odyssey is a solid 6/10 - 7/10 though. In retrospect it’s not as great as everyone says it is. It has a very small replay value. I mean I know it’s Mario but the story is as cliche as always. All but a couple of the worlds are just very bland and not very exciting. Not mentioning that the worlds are relatively small also. Then what lowers the score even more for me is that after you beat the game, you can just BUY moons to max out. The whole point of the game is to find and collect the moons. What’s the point if you can just buy them.
0/10 I expected more from Vincent van Gogh next time I was promised spider Man vs Darth Vader by Justin bieber but no I got a game about a hat that posseses mushrooms and dinosaurs also nothing even remotely interesting a dinosaur, who likes dinosaurs?! I want to play as a shoe not a stupid dinosaur. This game does not deserve even a 0/10 just no -999999999999999/10
0/10 There was no anime wifu's and the battle system was non exsistant!!! The story had no real plot no fight that was as amazing as Final Fantasy 7's Final fight. Also way too much water in SeaSide Kingdom, I HATE NINTENDO NOW I WANT A REFUND!1!!1 I'd give it a -10/10
I saw a review that that gave the game a decent score, but clearly they weren't playing the game. It legit said the in the review that Cappy was married to Tiara. I could see the misunderstanding for someone who hadn't played the game but it literally says she is his sister in the opening level of the game.
Nuclear Atom, Yo-kai never “ripped off Pokémon.” You, my friend, must’ve never played the games before. Just because these games are the same genre, doesn’t mean they’re identical. The fighting systems are radically different. Yo-kai Watch combines real time and turn based action, into an incredibly coherent fighting system. This fighting system requires a lot more strategy than Pokémon’s ever did once you start going up against the harder bosses. You have to manage your item turns, keep your healers alive, increase the amount of tribe unity bonuses on your team by rearranging the position of your Yo-kai. It just goes on and on. The story in Yo-kai Watch is very different when compared to Pokémon’s as well. Instead of fighting for Gym Badges and bragging rights, you actually go around helping people. And, in the 2nd game, you have to travel back in time to meet your dead grandfather, and equip a new Yo-kai Watch. Yo-kai Watch isn’t near dead. There are still active players in the community, and there are still people who watch the anime. Yo-kai Watch was never a Pokémon rip off. These games only shared the same genre. Calling Yo-kai Watch a rip off of Pokémon is like calling Super Smash Bros a rip off of Street Fighter, because they’re both fighting games. Moral of the story: Yo-kai Watch is not a Pokémon rip off, so make sure you think before you comment.
it seems that some people lack common sense, what a surprise. it also seems that this video is too overrated so I'll give it a 0/10 to balance the score.
I'm talking about how totally stupid these people are saying things like "OH! GAEM TOO OVERRATED! MUST GIVE 0 BECUZ TOO OVERRATED EVEN THO I THINK IT DESERVES A 7!". that's just completely moronic. I'm totally fine with different opinions but I can't stand people like these, also PLEASE do not try to defend them.
4:01 That was actually a huge compliment in my mind! As a dev/writer I would be proud that peoples opinion are so creative and outside of the box like this about my game!
I hate when people say Nintendo games don’t look as good because they’re not in 4K. I mean, have you played Mario Odyssey and BOTW? Those games are both beautiful even if they’re not in 4K
Also, who cares about graphics if the game SUCKS? Yeah I can play the most visually appealing game on the planet that renders flawlessly and looks so real, it's like someone recorded a live action movie but if the game is boring, then I wouldn't bother playing it. The mechanics and story matter WAY more in a game. I'd rather judge the game based off that over if it can make 4K resolution.
I particularly hate the 80 on Metacritic from an official reviewer whose only criticism was "too many moons". Also I feel like there are a lot of official Metacritic reviewers who are disappointed that it isn't Galaxy 3, something it was never meant to be.
General comments: "Why do haters put so much effort into hating something? Why can't they appreciate something good for once?" Me: "This is still a question to you? People suck. What else is new?"
-SPOILERS- mario and co didnt exactly die, they were just sent directly to the underworld, which is where ordinary people go after they DO die. Also while i'm on the topic, just pointing out that super paper mario was the first to introduce the idea of bowser and peach getting married, that part isn't new to odyssey :-)
Shahpur Khan Thanks for clearing that up! Also that is true, even if it wasn’t Bowser in control originally. Here’s an idea: What if every time Mario dies he has to adventure through the underworld to get back to life? Kinda makes me bad for killing Mario in mindless parkour... That would be an interesting mod/fan game idea though if Nintendo doesn’t take it down.
Digital Foundry confirmed it's 900p when docked with dynamic resolution... But I can't say that's necessarily a problem. They're prioritizing performance over resolution and that's fine for a platformer.
Whyamihere 44 Nobody is caring about resolution over frame rate though. Pretty sure the issue is that it's not *both* 60fps and 1080p. At least they prioritized the frame rate, but would have been nice to have both.
Mario’s nose is too round and big. - 0/10 I wasn’t sure how Nintendo would surpass the masterful quality and superb creativity of Super Mario Galaxy 1 & 2, but once again, they outdid themselves. Super Mario Odyssey is seriously the best game that I’ve ever played. - 10/10
RE: "This game is too easy" - I think it completely depends on how you play it. If you go to toad for all moon locations, and only get the amount of moons you need to get to the next level as soon as possible, it will probably be fun, but definitely doesn't accomplish what the game is built for. Just like with BOTW - there are options; and the way you play affects the enjoyment
I think when they say "easy" they are talking about how easy it is to play and win and beat. Having added a few challenging moons post game doesn't make the game "not easy". 90% of the moons are easy. The worlds are easy (all but luncheon land the ONLY land to challenge me at all)
I don't get why they have these expectations of Super Hard Mario games, except for a few instances or final levels, Mario hasn't been hard since he first jumped to 3D. Odessey is all about exploring (hence the overabundance of moons, narrative taking you to a different expansive universe, the incentive of adding more collectibles in already vistited worlds), it's more of a collectathon.
There are tons of moons that are very hard to get. There are also hundreds of moons you can't even get until you beat the game. It's not easy unless you go for the low hanging fruit only.
+Annette Jensen "Fire Emblem Warriors" does have different difficulty levels, you know. I'm pretty sure it's pretty challenging to play on the hardest difficulty level.
I hate when people add "it's just my opinion" to the ends of negative reviews. Like, no kidding! That's all a review is! But if "that's just your opinion" means "it doesn't count," why does "it's just my opinion" mean "don't criticize me?"
Copeland Pennington people think that they *NEED* to have their opinion out there and then as soon as someone’s like “why I like that thing” they go batshit and say “ITS JUST MY OPINION SORRY U CANT HANDLE IT”
Reviews aren’t even meant to be opinionated though. In an actual review, you want to grade the game justifiably with the least amount of bias as possible, so it’s best to keep personal opinion out of it.
MightyZard How can you review a game if you don't have an opinion on it? That's the whole point. If everyone did what you said, all reviews would be extremely similar.
The first guy said living hat... What?! It's not a living hat. It's a spirit that goes inside your hat cause it was ripped and so he could help you save peach and save his sister.
CIB actually it’s a spirit that’s naturally a hat but it can change into different hats, it doesn’t go inside Mario’s hat since he loses it in the start
That's something I really love about Mario games/universe. They make new races out of weirdest things. There are bean people, pillow people, sausage people, mushroom people and they're all so adorable and more importantly very unique!
The comment about being able to complete Odyssey in a short time span, making it a poor game, actually made me physically angry. Journey was fucking amazing imo and that game is like 2 hours at best
『 Lui 』 you can skip bosses EASILY. Just look at ANY speedrun of SMO, and you'll see that all of the bosses in the sand kingdom are skipped. (Unless it's a World Peace run)
Don't question peoples dumb logic, they'll find a way to prove they're right lmao. Pretty much all games are unrealistic these days, but it doesn't matter. they're fun.
Literally everything in the Mushroom Kingdom has eyes, from hills to clouds to mushrooms, yet when Mario’s hat gets eyes, it’s suddenly deemed unrealistic.
I DON'T OWN A SWITCH SO I AM GOING TO INSULT EVERYONE WHO DOES AND CALL ALL THE GAMES FOR THAT CONSOLE CRAP WITHOUT GIVING ANY REASON FOR IT!!! GYAAAAAH!
We need to just get over numerical review scores anyway in general as a concept. They just end up being bullshit far too often, get people worked up for no reason, people just looking at the number at the end instead of reading the actual review to get the context, etc.
Stick to the same formula: “it’s the same old repetitive bs! Blah blah blah” When they change the formula: “this isn’t the game I grew up playing! Wah wah wah” *Do you need your bib and blankie too?*
That Guy Gaming yeah most sonic fans are pretty smart and good people. Sorry if I offended anyone with the joke I do realize that it's a minority of fans that act like that.
Ah yes, why innovate when we can be the Michael Bay of video game design. Just look at the Transformers movies, they are shit, but they make money so why fix em am i right?
I'm all for innovation, but that argument is terrible. The main point was "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". Michael Bay movies are 'broke'. They need fixing. They are -not- a good example of something that happens to be fine and may avoid getting fixed.
*game literally has new mechanic of possessing enemies to gain new abilities, and a throwable platform “Wow there’s no innovation is this game whatsoever”
"A living hat is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of"
I am highly insulted
Boo the guy who did that
r/beetlejuicing
Sorry. If it help I love living hats.
OMG lol I will sub to reduce the pain
Same
Imagine your math teacher like "you deserve a A- but all other teachers are giving you A+ so I'm giving you a C to even out
RhythmGrizz no it isnt lol
What a ridiculous comment... You must be 'murkin
Yup. That’s what Metacritic is.
my language arts teacher
I'm British so I don't understand those. Please translate.
7.8/10 Seaside Kingdom has too much water
Cooki_Cats Lake Kingdom has much more water 7.7/10
Link from Hyrule its a joke
6.7/10 desert kingdom is to sandy
7.8 out of 10. Desert Kingdom has too much water.
Link from Hyrule woosh
7.8/10 *Too much water.*
This is fucking amazing
3/7
Not enough land.
Yay. Mety fan. 7.8/7.8
0/10 this game is good but I don't like being happy so yeah, I want attention
Boy you are not gonna like the windwaker
"...a whole nation of hat people and a hat economy and hat children just seems really weird to me."
Somebody hasn't played TF2.
Or a Hat in Time, or lots of other hat-based games...
hahaha
Considering all the absolutely crazy shit that people have made games about it seems almost normal to me.
karnovrpg Also, why is weird inherently bad? Sure it's weird because it's different. But it's still a unique idea and it was pretty cool.
Ever see that "Pinky and the Brain" episode "Brainwashed"? Part of it involved a land of hats. Sure, it was really just a bunch of people (and lab mouse; yes, just one, as Pinky's stupidity made him immune) forcibly given amnesia and made to think they were the hats they wore, but it was still hilarious and fitting of the theme.
2/10
You can't do the mario
I legit sang this song in my head after i saw the classic mario outfit. Super mario super show anyone?
Violet Leonard SWING YOUR ARMS FROM SIDE TO SIDE COME ON LETS ALL DO THE MARIO
It may be a very corny almost forgotten show but its corniness is what gives it that nostalgic charm.
Daniel Folgar TAKE ONE STEP, AND THEN AGAIN LETS DO THE MARIO ALL TOGETHER NOW
0/10 it's to good
*Hills, mushrooms, clouds, flowers, practically everything in the mushroom kingdom has eyes*
Makes sense to me!
*A hat has eyes*
OMFG SO UNREALISTIC WHAT IS THIS
NinjaMaster909 and that also includes captain toad 's hat - which has eyes - and u don't think makes sense
*Glues googly eyes on a hat*
*The hat becomes sentient and starts to float*
"Hi, i'm crappy!"
I like that it would've made sense to him had Cappy been the only living hat, but the fact there's a species of living hats from which Cappy comes from somehow makes it confusing.
Even in mario kart in daisy crusier EVEN THE CONES AND ARROWS HAVE EYES!
Also, unrealistic is a really stupid argument for a videogame that's not supposed to be realistic. I mean, you're an italian plumber doing your way to rescue the princess of a kingdom of mushroom head guys to fight a giant turtle with a white tuxedo.
“It disconnects the player from being immersed” Yes because my first thought when jumping into a Mario game is worrying about how immersed I am into my role as a super agile plumber with a silly mustache.
Hey! Don’t diss the mustache!
@@smashster1787 That mind of reminds me of the 11th Doctor: "Don't diss the Sonic!!"
It's called suspension of disbelief. And yes, it's important.
0/10, shirt is too orange. And the person in the video, didn't even get a graphics boost from the last video... Still the same old formula used for the video; Find bad reviews, make a good script and start recording. Wish the video was more like Tetris...
ha!
This is what they were pretty much saying all the time
Artwork is magic so I'm giving this video a 0/5 😉
wonderful review. 2.14/27
literally just spat my coffee out. so, thanks. Mr. Jokey... Joke-maker.
Red Roxy I hope you're thinking something like this - "Comment is so bad it made me spit out my coffee but to bring ratings up I am rating it 10/10" 😉🍵
Krest Ok
*SSSSCCCCCRRRRREEEEE*
It's the Zelda BotW situation again: "Reviews" by people who didn't even play the game.
Reinaldo Pereira Elisei The PS5masterrace guy in the video has a channel by the same name.
Reinaldo Pereira Elisei I actually have Zelda botw but I got bored because it was so repetitive and empty
Unigardy Well of course it's emptier than most others. It's an open world post apocalypse. As for repetitive, please explain.
Sage of Fire There was so much traveling around that you had to do, and you had to go those shrines which didn't have much action and were very boring for me. Everybody seems to love the game, so I assume it's just that I'm into more of a constant action thing, which isnt very present in Zelda except for the few parts with a lot of combat.
Sage of Fire It was actually the first Zelda game i ever tried besides the first one (which I didnt enjoy much either) because the nature of the series never seemed that interesting to me
i hope people dont believe that "mario is dead" crap
Jack HandsomePants He died with this game. RIP
He died since E3, Ridley kills him
I have killed him a couple times
@@splendidtank9908 I have smashed him sometimes
That didnt age well at all...
0/10, Mario wears red in the game.
communism
No. He wears green.
Luigi wears green, and there's a Luigi costume in Super Mario Odyssey.
Anti-Uploads Communist Christmas?
1/10
No enough loot crates, I didn't get a feeling of pride and accomplishment.
underrated comment
10/10 for the comment
Go play Zelda then. That series has tons of loot
Donovan Mahan Can you pay real life money to feel ''more accomplished'' than others, though?
we did it youtube
1/10 assist mode too hard and waluigi suit and cap are the wrong shade of purple, actually now its a 0/10 because this comment is too unoriginal
Fuck off.
You do realise that this is satire?
Logic
SlothRBX yeah I definitely think they played in assist mode.
My words exactly
"Botw was easy" kid did u even play the game
The Great Potato it was easy
and a bit tasteless if you ask me.
Try botw in master mode... Mario odyssey also should receive a master mode dlc
BOTW in Master Mode was still easy. The only "Challenge" was the Master Sword Trials, because enemies regen health (which imo was dumb).
If they took out the regen, made AI smarter, and made it so you take double damage, then it could be just a little bit harder. Otherwise, I'm still fighting Lynels at 3 hearts. So long as you can dodge and parry, you can kill anything....
There is no incentive to get hearts over stamina, because killing things faster is much more efficient than being able to *maybe* take one more hit....
In short, remove/rework the counter system to be less lenient. But hey, that's just my opinion. It definitely had it's challenge when I first started the game.
Kid it sounds like you did and if you struggled then well... get good?
0/10
Too much focus on Maro, where is Kirby?
more like more attention on luigi! WE WANT LUIGI'S MONTH BACK!
But where is sonic? I was promised a sonic game, it clearly says "Mario" in the title so therefore sonic should also be present. I demand a refund immediately.
Spuster ツ Kirby is best Nintendo
Forget Kirby! Where's Master Chief?
Notifiy Fox he isn’t nintendo
0/10 too much color, too much content, no micro transactions
TBH that's a BETTER review than some of the ones in the video.
It has no content actually.
Micro Transactions are the AMIIBOs, say whatever you want, but it's a FACT.
Yeah I agree that there are too much color, I mean my eyes literally bleed from watching the screen of my TV which's has a very low brightness.
Other than that it's easy af and dull af.
The True Mario Fan
If it had NO content,it wouldn't exist.
The unique content are the overused power moons scattered everywhere, speaking of which just makes the game easier and boring.
The True Mario Fan it's not an evil shitty micro transaction if you can still unlock the stuff in game without ever owning an amiibo. After saving peach you can buy (with in game coins) or collect power moons in order to unlock all the wedding costumes in game. Heck, when you first land on the moon, cappy gives the costume you get for tapping the wedding mario amiibo for free, no crazy cap shop needed. And don't say "oh it's going to take years to unlock the wedding costumes!!11 its just like darth vader in battle front: either waste 40+ hours of your life grinding for him or pay" as everyone is saying, moons are extremely easy to collect. You can also buy them in groups of ten in the shop with in game coins and I find coins quite plentiful in Super mario odyessy. Amiibo are completely optional and i feel like this would still be the way to unlock the wedding costumes in a world where amiibo were never invented at all.
0/10, this video is too easy. Too many people are enjoying it, so I'm going to give it a bad review to bring the score down.
Spicy Merchant 7/10 for me, it's over hyped and a bit boring
So many 0/10 in the comments, I'm going to give it a 10/10 because I always root for the underdog.
Right this way Mr president
Spicy Merchant It's a 9.5/10 for me, but I'm giving it a 0 because I think it's overhyped and doesn't deserve a 10.
XD
10/10: The game is bad
badass*
Is that a real review
the fun part about this reviews is that people calls this game a repetitive formula or nothing new here, when im pretty sure they get excited about every new call of duty or first person shooter announced. Xd
DaaaarK147 that is exactly what I said to my sister
Why would they? Do you know who writes these reviews?
OMG CALL OF DUTY 36!!!!! What? Mario? Come on, every single game is just basically a new map pack of the last.
Me: You literally just spent 398.99 on 23 map packs for Call of Duty.....
I do not like mario 64. It's just a 3D version of Mario Bros and it adds no originality to the franchise. The paintings as world portals was a good idea but was executed terribly. All Mario does is run, jump and collect stars. It was too easy and the final boss had such a simple mechanic. 1/10.
BTW THIS COMMENT IS A PARODY OF THESE REVIEWS o3o
The game is good, but controls and camera are 2/10 overall 6/10 for me
Vladimir Gonzalez "Elite Humor" Then proceeds to use *XD*
Oh god you tricked me for a second.
Vladimir Gonzalez “elite humor”
Continues on to say XD
Does anyone else remember how Nintendo is kinda a "all ages" company?
Mother 3 was pretty dark and a depressing game. Sometimes its not really "All ages" considering how dark it is. Thats the only nintendo game that is necessarily "All ages".
Rawrrwrarararrarararaw. Good point, I haven't actually played the game or seen the end so I'm not one to talk about it BUT if kids under 10 play GTA V, they're probably gonna play a Mario game despite how it's gonna have a dark ending
Mother 3 is COMPLETELY different than GTA V, if GTA is somebody's favorite game, they may not like mother 3's play style. But mother 3 is the best game ever in my opinion. I just like it's play style more than other games.
Rawrrwrarararrarararaw. Sorry i was just using GTA as an example of a game that is definitely NOT for children but they play it anyways.
Also I have never played nor seen Mother 3, only Mother 2 so I don't have much I can say about that
Samuel Heit well, in Japan they have different culture from us in America, so there might be normal since they have multiple gods and superstitions.
Its a good game but personally it was a 8.5 for me but giving it a 0 is insane
SuperZombiepimp DiD yOu JuSt UsE tWo BuTs In A RoW-
I know
SuperZombiepimp *aN 8.5
Tbh I pretty much agree, or an 8. Tbh I've never liked the controls in mario games. I can't stand the whole slip slidey crap
7 from me
I really love that art behind you...
thebahooplamaster The pikachu one is badass
Apparently Salmonids like to fly
*SCREEEE!!*
thebahooplamaster hi
thebahooplamaster The Pikachu one is really cute
"to justify a worthless system"
Sir I'm sorry but a gaming system that can be both portable and a home console is basically the best thing Nintendo has ever come up with. I'm not saying this to be a kiss ass to nintendo but it's fairly true.
Killer Bee I think with some minor improvements it could become the best game console to date. It's definitely the most innovative though.
I haven't seen anything like this with PS4 or XBOX yet so +5 for Nintendo
lmao ok, so they make a console less powerful than its predecessor but it's portable and overpriced, so all of a sudden it's the best console of the generation. Face it kids, it's not a console if it's a handheld with a dock
Kanus Cochranus
1st off if it's not a console then wtf is it?
2nd you literally called it a console in the first sentence of your comment... Also it's obviously not less powerful than its predecessor if you can play shit like Skyrim and Doom on the go. The fact that you can play those 2 games on a portable console is quite astounding in itself.
Have you seen the downgrade on DOOM? lmao ok bud. Also you never really picked up on the fact I was just taking the piss out of the switch, so the validity of my comment isn't necessarily something all that important. However the experience of DOOM on the Switch is vastly inferior to other consoles with a locked framerate and marred visuals that make it seem choppy in comparison to other consoles, so no, it's not astounding at all since you can play graphically intensive games on mobile phones which don't have dedicated graphics. y'all nintendrones can't take any criticism lmao.
most of these reviews looks like it came from "edgy" gamers who I believe are really confused as to what are they looking for in a certain game.
I'm not a die hard Mario fan, the only Mario game I played are the original super Mario, Mario 64, and Mario kart 8. but seeing the user reviews at metacritic just makes me... mad. so I want to help address some of it.
1) all game titles are all the same with a little bit of added formula (I.E the hat in Mario odyssey, ship battles in assassins creed 4, etc.), in fact Mario is the most diverse character out there that have racing games, party games, sports games, even educational games, and more. so stating that "there's nothing new" (even though the "new" gimmick in this game here is the hat) in a game is a negative factor are biased as hell.
2) NOT ALL GAME ARE SUPPOSED TO BE CHALLENGING OR REALISTIC. I think Nintendo already stated this when they (badly) marketed the Wii U to kids that they make games not as a way for players to escape reality into a new one, but as a way to have odd, creative, weird, and FUN experiences in a game, that's why their games are rarely realistic and are more family friendly (or kiddie as some would say). The last challenging Mario games that I've seen or known about is the original super Mario, and it was challenging due to it's limitations at the time.
3) I mean the game is about plumbers fighting against a giant freaking turtle that kidnapped a princess of a mushroom people kingdom and the plumber get paid by coins inside a small (but the same size as his body) brick cube that he have to break, and THE WEIRDEST THING that you can think of is the alien hat??
I'm not saying that the review that gives good score are in the right and all bad ones are wrong, reviews should be seen by the details of their analysis of the game. most reviews are dumb because good and bad reviews are all saying the same thing, it's just a matter of the reviewer personal experience/ problems with the game that'll influence the score (most of the time biased), and review scores will attract assholes and band-wagoners.
For some reason, I'm torn on whether or not you spelled all those names incorrectly on purpose for effect, or you genuinely dunced the whole comment, in which both instances I tip my hat to you sir.
Jibrail Laksmono
As overrated as Mario is it seems like u either love the game or dont like it. I dont like this Mario, Zelda is far better game but even thats mediocre to me. I say that to say this because Im having a terrible time with my switch. If ur not into Nintendo's IPs the switch isnt really something to have right now. N how much can u milk a plumber. I think its time to put Mario to rest n start making a new successor
Woah, I get that people should respect each others' opinions, but this is way out of wack. For starters, a new IP? Mario hasn't died out in any form or fashion. For the past several decades, Mario has been a forefront in the genres he's served it. From 2D to 3D platformers, to all his various spin-offs, it's incredible what Nintendo can do with a single IP. If you don't like Odyessey, chances are you just don't like the 3D platformer genre. Unless you can give me an indepth analysis of this game, compared with another platformer akin to Mario (which is a giant task), then ok, I see your point, but the only 2 things I can assume from your comment is:
The Switch sucks cause it either feels bad or it's not working properly
Mario is simply overrated, no other criticisms.
Both cases are bad sure, but both weren't in the realm of decision for Nintendo. It's not like they can influence your thinking in such a dramatic sense, that's just your attitude, that's that.
Mason Shen
I like the switch its just I dont have anything on it I would like to play right now until Xenoblade. Ratchet n Clank in my opinion was a better game. Better storyline, more n better gameplay mechanics, great level up system, graphically better, challenging bosses with better design, great platforming with the use of different skills n tools, great variety of weapons, n even though Ratchet doesnt have as much charm as Mario he has way more character.
Jibrail Laksmono He isn't a plumber anymore though...
I think Mario Odyssey was meant to be easy and forgiving in order to encourage exploration.
The reason deaths only take 10 coins, the reason moons count even after death, the reason there are checkpoints everywhere.
They want you to explore every nook and cranny of the worlds. They want you try to see if you can do that crazy risky jump or see if you can go down that narrow path.
If they game reset you every time you died, exploring would be so risky and time consuming that it wouldn’t be worth it to take the jump.
Yeah, this game is about exploration
3:24 Good to know difficulty is the only way of measuring a game's quality.
5:59 "This game was literally built for children"
No, it was build for one specific person. His name was "Shit Sherlock", first name "No".
8:02 Actually, I think they're implying that they're merging the two scores together. A 5/5 and a 0/5 make for a 5/10. But honestly, that's even dumber. Why would you rate a game based on its fanbase?
8:21 Again, it makes total sense to rate a game lower specifically because everyone else likes it.
12:11 "If you liked this video, then why don't you give it a 10 or a 0 depending on some arbitrary factor?"
Isn't that how youtube's likes and dislikes work anyways?
blekksverd for the last point it's no, because before there was an actual star rating method, there it's just : if you like a thumb up and etc (it's not necessary and doesn't influence your channel even thought now every one like sgit and lies so they put thumbs up to watch mojo and others)... if it was a rating like before you could see the rating below the video minia, so if you had bad ratings it influence your channel critics because the same people can walk to others of your videos and lower your ratings even if your videos are excellent like games on appstores on phones (even if i say it again, people of today love shit and shitty copies of other games, exemple : mario, candy crush, sonic...)
blekksverd lololollollo
blekksverd
I dont like how they dont show the dislike numbers on comments
8:21
No it doesn't
+Tycho Wozniaki See, that's the problem with youtube comments. I can't read them in a sarcastic voice to make the intentions clearer. But no, obviously that doesn't make sense.
0/10 it's a mario game havent played it
ddawg plays 03 same MY DAD GOT IT FOR ME FOR CHRISTMAS BUT ITS TWO DAYS nooooooooooooooo
Pixel Elite Lol me too but I get it tomorrow because in germany christmas is on the 24th
0/10 Switch too expensive, can't play it.
ddawg plays 03 0/10 haven't finished it
XD don't worry ddawg plays 03 your not the only one who hasn't played it yet heck I don't even have a switch yet
7.5/10 Too much Mario :)
Be original
6.335903580345/10 not enough MARRRRRIO
7.8/10 to much hat
Breath of the wild:9.6/10
Odyssey:9.5/10
Those were the official scores on the nintendo website last time i checked
7/10 at best
@@maverickay5807 0/10 at best. I mean come on, a plumber named Mario? I've never seen anything so dumb in a video game, I expect more from Sega next time
K X Mind me asking why it’s only 7, instead of the average 9-10? I’m not angry, just curious.
@@skillwaffles9858 yeah a plumber that does nothing plumber related like fixing toilets and whatnot 0/10 😂
@@skillwaffles9858 it's a lot of fun but suffers from less direction than sunshine and galaxy by making power moons just random pick ups a lot of the time. It never feels like a Star did.
Levels are big but that doesn't always mean better. They are all hit or miss. Some hit wonderful and others don't really work.
2:15
*sniff sniff*
Is that? Jealousy I smell?
Someone didn't get that Nintendo switch they wanted for Christmas
Nice.
I'm proud of you my son
Nice
Considering that as of that video there wasn't a christmas I'd say that it's probably a birthday
It might also be one of those PS4/Xbox people who say everything that's Nintendo sucks
why the hell do people think the challenge comes from the enemies and bosses? it's a platformer, the challenge comes from the level design, which I think this game does pretty well as far as difficulty scaling goes. There is a serious difference between cascade kingdom and bowser's kingdom. Bowser's kingdom has bottomless pits and lava and both are instakills, tons of bombs and the enemy you capture in bowser's kingdom is used well with the design of the level and with said enemy you are constantly hopping around above bottomless pits and other hazards.
If there were anything I'd complain about, I guess the levels are pretty basic? I'd love to have had a nicer variety of levels, maybe a ghost house would be a nice settings instead of having two water levels. More creative settings like cap kingdom would've been cool or maybe have had the ruined kingdom be a full level instead of just the settings for a boss fight (LOVE the visuals in that level, it clashes with mario in a good way.)
What level design? There is no part of the game that’s hard unless you bad at games
regardless of whether or not you think the game is hard, there is absolutely no arguing that bowser's kingdom is flat out more hazardous and more difficult than cascade kingdom.
It’s just that these people never played the game
The difficulty from enemies is nullified in a 3d space because you can circumvent them and they become a nonissue. The only way to make them a threat is to force the player to deal with them and that usually means halting progression, leading to a game that isn't very fun to play because your progression would be constantly halted to deal with these things that the game wants you to perceive as threatening.
That actual platforming is way, way more inviting to develop difficulty around and can lead to fun and interesting navigation while scaling the difficulty properly through the experience.
Since there are no objective truths when it comes to design philosophy I'm just going to say that both sides of this exchange are gonna show some subjectivity. That being said, I believe completely differently about what type of difficulty a 3d platformer should try to cultivate. I think making combat more complex takes away from the core experience and would just be a secondary obstacle to the average player and just come out as an annoyance. I think the margin of enemy variety you can make and have fun fights with in the 3d platformer setting is pretty small. Instead I think enemies should be placed to complement the platforming, or even have a mechanic within them that enhances/cripples your platforming ability. This game actually does this quite well with the capture mechanic and non-capturable enemies in general. The up-roots help you get to hard to reach areas and the birds in bowser kingdom (forgot their name, forgive me :C) help you navigate over large pits and tall walls. And the guys that slam the blocks down in bowser's kingdom (again, not familiar with the name) give you some platforms to work with if you choose to.
If your game is primarily a platformer, I think you should use all the tools available to enhance platforming. The same applies to combat oriented games and I think any mechanic introduced should complement the mechanics they're working with and not be two different playstyles packed into a single game. I think enemies should be tools to utilize and not one of the primary hazards you use to scale difficulty.
Not all games need to be challenging, some can be just fun
Tbh the people who complain it's too easy haven't even played the game (or at least not far enough)...Some of the post game moons definitely aren't easy at all. The game forces you to learn how to make good use of cappy for some of them.
And then there is people who complain that it is too easy but they go over and play cuphead and complain it is too hard...people will just try to fuck everyone up
I’ve died so much in this game idk why people call it easy
"Nope, every good game needs to be only beatable by the MLG players! I remember when just beating a game was an achievement!"
Yeah, those folks need to chill.
IKR i honestly don't understand what gamer's want
Cuphead: 0/10 its to hard
Super Mario Odyssey: 0/10 its to easy
"Mario needs to be HARDERRRRRR!"
Play Super Mario Bros. 3.
Or better. Super Mario Bros the lost levels a.k.a Super Mario Bros 2 in Japan.
@@mep6302 Tbh that one's not just hard, it's cruel, it's deliberately designed to trip you up
@@codo8584 its evil .... I struggle with platformers so when donkey kong tropical freeze I was a bit terrified... but when it takes me vack to the beginning of the level that is much more reasonable
More like super Mario 2
@@tayyababebo9782 The Lost Levels is more frustrating than hard, and is just a bad game. Mario bros 3 is a difficult game but has some of the best level design in any mario game and offers hours of entertainment
NINTENDO SHOULD APOLOGIZE FOR ALL THE HATS IN THE HAT TOWN.
"SORRY ALL CAPS"
Omg all caps I get it
Very good sir. I tip my hat to you.
+Tacozilla1 *Pun intended*
Wooooow.....wooooow......
Tacozilla1 you have earned yourself a like
-4/10 it has no violence, gore and guns -10 year olds
I think 12 year olds get more crap than they deserve. Most 12 year olds probably don’t even play COD. I’m 13 and I freaking LOVE Mario.
Well, I guess you're right. I actually know some young people who don't play violent games.
yeah I'm 12 i love r18 m15 m and pg i don't care what i play i was obsessed with mario 64
EduardoIsMe And those are the same people who think they're entitled beyond belief, too. But that's a different topic for a different video.
This is what an edgy 12 year old would say:
"This game sucks ass because there are no guns and swearing, how can a game be cool if you can't do that?"
This is what a 90's kid would say:
"This game is bad because it wasn't made in the 90's and it didn't live up to all of my extremely specific requirements!"
This is what an SJW would say:
"This game is racist, sexist, and homophobic because I say it is!"
Those reviews in a nutshell :
*It's not a [Insert any video game company that is not Nintendo] game so this sucks [Insert stupid reason so they can call it a 'review']*
"This isn't an Xbox One/Ps4 game, 0 stars! Oh, you thought I was done?
(Insert paragraph about how the game is too easy)
(Insert paragraph about how the game is boring)
(And the special haters insert a paragraph about how the game is not 4k)
(And finally, some insults to Nintendo)
All said and done."
0 out of 19 found this helpful.
Are you implying that people who don’t like the game for some reason or another are wrong? Let them dislike it it doesn’t affect you so why do you care?
King Aardvark : They are talking about review bombing. People who give games 0/10 without even playing the game. Sony fans for unknown reasons are the worst for it, they have heaps of good games supposedly so why they do this is weird.
OTPulse Ok then it’s unethical in this case. However in some cases(Bethesda) I’m fine with it.
OTPulse Disliking a game because its boring or easy is valid.
Cap Kingdom is Purg-hat-ory.
what have you done
Never do that again!
What have you brought upon this cursed land 😂
11/100 too much water
It was sarcastic -_-
This is not Pokemon Omega Ruby and alpha sapphire and the rating should be 7.8/10
what was that from? i legit forgot. and i remember finding it hilarious
Matthew Flores Looks like someone doesn't get the joke.
CringeMaster 3000 I think he was joking too...
9.999/10 because no Luigi
Edit: 220 likes!? Whoa!
Terrabyte Luigi is kinda in it as a costume but it takes a while to get it
Terrabyte no wario or waluigi
SuperToad Brandon wario and waluigi are also costumes
No princess peach
Terrabyte luigi not in this game?
1/10 no solid snake.
Evan Jarrell lol! I hope we end up seeing metal gear on switch.
What's wrong? Snake. Snake? SNAKE!
Solid snake? I was hoping for liquidy snake
1/10
It's not melee
-Nathaniel Bandy
hahaha
ITS NOT MELEE
Suddenly NB triggered
Striving for originality
A Dutch gaming magazine gave it a 7.8 just because Yoshi wasn’t in it, but Yoshi is in the game
I guess, but you only use him for a handful of moons.
UtherSwagBringer cause yoshi gets boring to use after every five puzzles
This is coming from a guy who loves the lil guy and used him all the time in SM World
CartmanBrah It would make the game quality better and therefore more fun
7.8 out of ten too much not yoshi
Phanpy Tv Seems like they have their priorities well set
The game's difficulty was never the point of Mario Odyssey. It's more about taking in the sights and sounds of these wonderfully weird environments and sounds and using Cappy to find a creative way to collect the copious amounts of Power Moons. If you really are looking to Mario for a challenge, then you play Lost Levels or the insane amounts of Kaizo-like levels in Mario Maker.
Yeah I think the whole put-yourself-through-hell thing has a time and a place, but don't forget the fun in exploring! The shiba inus that play catch? The giant champagne glasses? THE ENDGAME WITH BOWSER?
yeah, the game is beautiful.... and it also pisses me off sometimes (Wooded Kingdom Moon No. 67)
Orion Icarus the only thing that was a challenge for me was the beach volleyball moon. Even though there was only 1 challenging moon, I have still played it for over 130 hours and have fun every time I pick up the game.
0/10 only one character they really couldn’t add sonic or link?
10/10 can Cosplay
Link has his own games
And sonic has games on switch so shush pokefanboy
0/10 you can't play as isabelle from animal Crossing which as an animal Crossing player is very disappointing (this is a lie, non of this is true Im just joking around lol)
The dislike on the video was because I thought that there are too many likes and this video doesn't deserve them even though i enjoyed it
thefury770able if you liked the video, the why doesn't it deserve like?
Bearded Raccoon did you watch the whole video?
Noa Lindqvist yeah. Was it intended as a pun? Sorry, my mind is a little slow today. I haven't been getting enough sleep lately. I've been staying up a lot later than I should, because I need to study for my finals.
Nah, it wasn’t a pun, just a joke mimicking the mentality of the uneducated twats who “review” to lower the average score.
thefury770able this comment is overrated and too easy.
I feel sorry for these reviewers for not having a proper childhood and are basically FPS zombies...
I made the right decision staying with Nintendo instead of moving to Xbox lol.
awesomemercerdude me too nintendo is my childhood!
NINTENDO FOREVER :3
Oh and Odyssey reviewers (the real ones) aren't kidding. I HAVE Odyssey, and it really, really does deserve it's 10/10.
awesomemercerdude I agree,but there is no such thing as a perfect game.
Elias Badillo 10/10 does not mean perfect it just means your experience with the game was great and the pros outweighed the cons
theres only 3 reviews. 0/10 would not recomend. 10/10 would play again and 7.8/10 too much water.
Odyssey is a solid 6/10 - 7/10 though. In retrospect it’s not as great as everyone says it is. It has a very small replay value. I mean I know it’s Mario but the story is as cliche as always. All but a couple of the worlds are just very bland and not very exciting. Not mentioning that the worlds are relatively small also.
Then what lowers the score even more for me is that after you beat the game, you can just BUY moons to max out. The whole point of the game is to find and collect the moons. What’s the point if you can just buy them.
Super Mario Odysessy is racist to dragon Turtles
4/10
0/10 I expected more from Vincent van Gogh next time I was promised spider Man vs Darth Vader by Justin bieber but no I got a game about a hat that posseses mushrooms and dinosaurs also nothing even remotely interesting a dinosaur, who likes dinosaurs?! I want to play as a shoe not a stupid dinosaur. This game does not deserve even a 0/10 just no -999999999999999/10
This comment cracked me up!
Small Childe I hope you are being sarcastic...
+Sniperdiaper Girl I don't think anyone can be that obnoxious non-sarcastically.
+Small Childe This was hilarious!
7:08 captain toad>mario odyssey
WTF
0/10 no waluigi
Shaanu Sahota costume
Shaanu Sahota I need my fucking boi
Shaanu Sahota -100 No Luigi as a character
WAAAA
[ Insert the 4th comment talking about the costume here ]
1/10
Not enough weapon menu also no salmon run or turf war. Too easy. I beet dis gayme en 2 Sekends!11!!!!!1!!!1!!!
MAZ 1 uhhhh sir this is odessey not splatoon
I thought this was sonic adventure 3...
Agreed ;)
i thought it was 12 ounce mouse.
0/10 There was no anime wifu's and the battle system was non exsistant!!! The story had no real plot no fight that was as amazing as Final Fantasy 7's Final fight. Also way too much water in SeaSide Kingdom, I HATE NINTENDO NOW I WANT A REFUND!1!!1 I'd give it a -10/10
Also 0/10
There's too many coins
0/10 the coins don't add to my savings account try harder next time Microsoft
That sounds like a New Super Mario Bros 2 review 🤣
I saw a review that that gave the game a decent score, but clearly they weren't playing the game. It legit said the in the review that Cappy was married to Tiara. I could see the misunderstanding for someone who hadn't played the game but it literally says she is his sister in the opening level of the game.
Roll Tide.
sweet home alabama
5.5/10, Too many Yo-kais.
Wait, wrong review.
Yo-kai is dead. That's the punishment for ripping off Pokemon.
Nuclear Atom, Yo-kai never “ripped off Pokémon.” You, my friend, must’ve never played the games before. Just because these games are the same genre, doesn’t mean they’re identical.
The fighting systems are radically different. Yo-kai Watch combines real time and turn based action, into an incredibly coherent fighting system. This fighting system requires a lot more strategy than Pokémon’s ever did once you start going up against the harder bosses. You have to manage your item turns, keep your healers alive, increase the amount of tribe unity bonuses on your team by rearranging the position of your Yo-kai. It just goes on and on.
The story in Yo-kai Watch is very different when compared to Pokémon’s as well. Instead of fighting for Gym Badges and bragging rights, you actually go around helping people. And, in the 2nd game, you have to travel back in time to meet your dead grandfather, and equip a new Yo-kai Watch.
Yo-kai Watch isn’t near dead. There are still active players in the community, and there are still people who watch the anime. Yo-kai Watch was never a Pokémon rip off. These games only shared the same genre. Calling Yo-kai Watch a rip off of Pokémon is like calling Super Smash Bros a rip off of Street Fighter, because they’re both fighting games.
Moral of the story: Yo-kai Watch is not a Pokémon rip off, so make sure you think before you comment.
Yanni Pappelis I actually like Yo-Kai watch better than pokémon I like pokémon but I actually like yo-Kai watch better
Yanni Pappelis lol you're absolutely right. I play Yo Kai Watch and Pokémon. Both great and very distinct games lol.
The Final Fantasy 14 review board is over there.
it seems that some people lack common sense, what a surprise.
it also seems that this video is too overrated so I'll give it a 0/10 to balance the score.
Jayacheal or they have a differing opinion
Freeze if watch the video, one said that they gave it 0/10 even know his real is 7/10.....watch the video
its a form of protest. think about it
I'm talking about how totally stupid these people are saying things like "OH! GAEM TOO OVERRATED! MUST GIVE 0 BECUZ TOO OVERRATED EVEN THO I THINK IT DESERVES A 7!". that's just completely moronic.
I'm totally fine with different opinions but I can't stand people like these, also PLEASE do not try to defend them.
This video doesn't deserve to be uploaded.
4:01 That was actually a huge compliment in my mind! As a dev/writer I would be proud that peoples opinion are so creative and outside of the box like this about my game!
I hate when people say Nintendo games don’t look as good because they’re not in 4K. I mean, have you played Mario Odyssey and BOTW? Those games are both beautiful even if they’re not in 4K
They are still bad though, fanboy.
The True Mario Fan lol what
The True Mario Fan
Change your account name.
The True Mario Fan You sir, are a complete jackass
Also, who cares about graphics if the game SUCKS? Yeah I can play the most visually appealing game on the planet that renders flawlessly and looks so real, it's like someone recorded a live action movie but if the game is boring, then I wouldn't bother playing it. The mechanics and story matter WAY more in a game. I'd rather judge the game based off that over if it can make 4K resolution.
7.8/10 Too much Moons - IGN
Funny thing is, IGN gave the game a 10/10.
Brian Brennan
10/10 "It's okay" -IGN
A Saturday Morning Cartoon Villain
7.8/10 Too much hats -IGN
I particularly hate the 80 on Metacritic from an official reviewer whose only criticism was "too many moons". Also I feel like there are a lot of official Metacritic reviewers who are disappointed that it isn't Galaxy 3, something it was never meant to be.
Are you fucking serious? An 8 is still amazing. Why are you complaining? And yes, there's a lot of moons. People are able to criticise if they want.
Their only criticism was basically "too much content". Let that sink in.
Echocookie An 8 is still amazing. Something can have no explainable flaws yet not be a ten.
Echocookie I never said people can't criticise a criticism.
7/10 too many moons
not enough princess peach yelling “MAAAARRRRRIOOOOooooOoOooOoOo” 0/10
General comments: "Why do haters put so much effort into hating something? Why can't they appreciate something good for once?"
Me: "This is still a question to you? People suck. What else is new?"
Mettaton Ex it's going to be great when you find this comment in like 2 or 3 years and wince at what you said
too easy huh? TURN OFF ASSIST MODE U NORMIES
Callinater how to turn of assist mode cus haven’t played it yet i don’t wanna play on assist mode
There's an amazing menu called OPTIONS
😱 options exist!!
Assist mode is off by default.
I didn't even know assist mode was a thing until after I cleared the main game ^^;
One time I saw a review that gave a 7.5/10 and said "too much sand"
the thinginator guy 90 Fucking Anakin
It should have been 7,8
-IGN
I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere.
7.8/10 Too much water
I'm disliking the video. I greatly enjoyed it, but I don't think it deserves the like/dislike ratio that it has.
Is now when I give your comment a thumbs down because I thought it was funny?
I’m disliking this comment, I thought it was funny, but I don’t think it deserves this many likes.
Why did you right this?
Not Sonic Forces -10/13, 21
4:28 Didn’t Super Paper Mario kill Mario and bring him back to life in one of the worlds or am I mistaken?
-SPOILERS-
mario and co didnt exactly die, they were just sent directly to the underworld, which is where ordinary people go after they DO die.
Also while i'm on the topic, just pointing out that super paper mario was the first to introduce the idea of bowser and peach getting married, that part isn't new to odyssey :-)
Shahpur Khan Thanks for clearing that up! Also that is true, even if it wasn’t Bowser in control originally.
Here’s an idea: What if every time Mario dies he has to adventure through the underworld to get back to life? Kinda makes me bad for killing Mario in mindless parkour... That would be an interesting mod/fan game idea though if Nintendo doesn’t take it down.
+Choco Chomp did you know there us a fangame that actually does that? Its called Super Mario 64 Star Road. You should check it out!
Ljemo I actually saw it recently, it looks awesome and I’ll find a way to play it sometime!
0/10 The skeleton skin has a nose.
Reviews: nothing new
Cappy: Am I a joke to you
I want that pikachu poster behind you...
light darksoul same
light darksoul I think it’s a paining but still wish I could get one.
I was staring at it the whole video lol
light darksoul same
SoraIsMyHomeboy same
The fact that these...."reviews"...hurt the game's general score in Metacritic (or whatever website this is) is disgusting. Shouldn't be considered
Metacritic needs some quality control
Agreed. Some of the reviews were made from accounts were made to bash the game and never going to used again.
So are you saying people don’t like the game so there voice shouldn’t be heard?
No. The people who didn't touch the game and saying they don't like it shouldn't be heard (Which is about the 90% of the low scores more than likely).
Whyamihere 44 How do you know that? I don’t think you do.
Digital Foundry confirmed it's 900p when docked with dynamic resolution... But I can't say that's necessarily a problem. They're prioritizing performance over resolution and that's fine for a platformer.
It's sad to see people caring more about resolution rather than frame rate.
Whyamihere 44 Nobody is caring about resolution over frame rate though. Pretty sure the issue is that it's not *both* 60fps and 1080p. At least they prioritized the frame rate, but would have been nice to have both.
..like the many 1080 / 60 games on other consoles? yeah...
I'll take gameplay quality over graphical quanity any day of the week. Then again, I'm a gamer from way back in the Colecovision days, so...
Dicker Mittelfinger the ps4 could run this 1080p 60fps tho.....
Mario’s nose is too round and big.
- 0/10
I wasn’t sure how Nintendo would surpass the masterful quality and superb creativity of Super Mario Galaxy 1 & 2, but once again, they outdid themselves. Super Mario Odyssey is seriously the best game that I’ve ever played.
- 10/10
RE: "This game is too easy" - I think it completely depends on how you play it. If you go to toad for all moon locations, and only get the amount of moons you need to get to the next level as soon as possible, it will probably be fun, but definitely doesn't accomplish what the game is built for. Just like with BOTW - there are options; and the way you play affects the enjoyment
I think when they say "easy" they are talking about how easy it is to play and win and beat. Having added a few challenging moons post game doesn't make the game "not easy". 90% of the moons are easy.
The worlds are easy (all but luncheon land the ONLY land to challenge me at all)
I don't get why they have these expectations of Super Hard Mario games, except for a few instances or final levels, Mario hasn't been hard since he first jumped to 3D. Odessey is all about exploring (hence the overabundance of moons, narrative taking you to a different expansive universe, the incentive of adding more collectibles in already vistited worlds), it's more of a collectathon.
There are tons of moons that are very hard to get. There are also hundreds of moons you can't even get until you beat the game. It's not easy unless you go for the low hanging fruit only.
I accidently went through a level backwards and learned you can infinitely combo the hat dive.
+Annette Jensen "Fire Emblem Warriors" does have different difficulty levels, you know. I'm pretty sure it's pretty challenging to play on the hardest difficulty level.
0/10 i would've rated it 10/10 but everyone else rated it ten so i want to bring down the score!
XD that review made me laugh so hard
HTG // HaydenTheGamer Well they were going to give it a seven but they wanted the overall score to be seven so they decided to give it a zero.
Eclipser505 IKR how does someone even come to think of that?
I hate when people add "it's just my opinion" to the ends of negative reviews. Like, no kidding! That's all a review is! But if "that's just your opinion" means "it doesn't count," why does "it's just my opinion" mean "don't criticize me?"
Copeland Pennington people think that they *NEED* to have their opinion out there and then as soon as someone’s like “why I like that thing” they go batshit and say “ITS JUST MY OPINION SORRY U CANT HANDLE IT”
Reviews aren’t even meant to be opinionated though.
In an actual review, you want to grade the game justifiably with the least amount of bias as possible, so it’s best to keep personal opinion out of it.
MightyZard How can you review a game if you don't have an opinion on it? That's the whole point. If everyone did what you said, all reviews would be extremely similar.
You ever seen the internet. It's beautiful yet toxic
Fahad Khan Just like a woman?
3/10 Too Much Hat
Too much cap
The first guy said living hat... What?! It's not a living hat. It's a spirit that goes inside your hat cause it was ripped and so he could help you save peach and save his sister.
CIB actually it’s a spirit that’s naturally a hat but it can change into different hats, it doesn’t go inside Mario’s hat since he loses it in the start
thanks for the correction
CORRECTION TO YOUR CORRECTION, IT IS AN ALREADY HAT-SHAPED SPIRIT THAT MAGICALLY REPAIRS YOUR HAT THEN POSSESSES IT.
A hat spirit. Goes inside a hat. Seems pretty redundant to me.
That's something I really love about Mario games/universe. They make new races out of weirdest things. There are bean people, pillow people, sausage people, mushroom people and they're all so adorable and more importantly very unique!
This game deserves a 10, but I will be giving it a 25/10 to counteract the undeserved 0's.
well you did good
The comment about being able to complete Odyssey in a short time span, making it a poor game, actually made me physically angry. Journey was fucking amazing imo and that game is like 2 hours at best
(Plays the first few worlds) "Too easy. 3/10."
"It's too linear!"
Meanwhile I'm skipping boss fights,jumping buildings and skipping world's completely 😆
~450 moons and still skipped a story boss
SquidKrish I
It is not possible to skip a single world... if you complain about the older games... look at 3d world where you actually can do that...
『 Lui 』 you can skip bosses EASILY. Just look at ANY speedrun of SMO, and you'll see that all of the bosses in the sand kingdom are skipped. (Unless it's a World Peace run)
ua-cam.com/video/45lw-9NIZac/v-deo.html
If you really want it to be hard, just try doing min captures, max moons.
Riley B if switch had achievements I would do this
Even harder: speedrun the entire game
I got all captures :D
Min captures, max moons, jumpless
Coinless
1:04 I hope this person never plays Minish Cap.
Anonymous Waddle Dee Oh dear Hylia. He'll be super pissed.
A kingdom with Mushroom people, mushroom economy and mushroon children doesn't make any sence either...
“I’m 13 and got first hair on ball. Nintendo is for babies. 0/10.”
The user review experience.
i havent played the game yet cause i dont own a switch, but it looks so awesome, dont call it bad yet unless you've played it people
Don't call it good if you haven't played it yet,
i said it looks awesome, lol
They say it looks bad lol
But it is an awesome game
i bet, im hoping to get a switch during christmas
0/10 Peach rejects you 😂😂😂😂😂
r/emojipasta
She's a strong independent woman who don't need no man.
Caroniver Robocacci more like a weak dumbass that always gets peachnapped!
Makoto Naegi When was the last time a giant spiky turtle king with literal armies tried to force you to love him? Did you avoid his kidnappings?
Zachary Mikhailov Font worry. I beat the game too
They said that living hats were dumb...
Umm what about talking hedgehogs who use emeralds to turn super Saiyan?
My thoughts exactly. It's like, they are hating on the game just for being unrealistic.
Don't question peoples dumb logic, they'll find a way to prove they're right lmao. Pretty much all games are unrealistic these days, but it doesn't matter. they're fun.
Phant0mLord360noscopemlg Dank Meme Lord that is the best comment ever
Literally everything in the Mushroom Kingdom has eyes, from hills to clouds to mushrooms, yet when Mario’s hat gets eyes, it’s suddenly deemed unrealistic.
Darkling276 yes, agree, even racing simulators have their unrealism
"You deserve a 62k salary but all the other employees are getting 70k, so you get 50k"
Can you beat super mario oddysey without jumping?
Nope after the first cutscene you have to jump to wake up
how about in half and A-press?
Now let's talk about parallel dimensions
An a press is an a press, you can't say it's only a half
Not even if there's a Scuttlebug?
yeah but from where would you even start doing the half A.ress? From the Swith Menu? From the Game Main Menu? FROM WHERE SHOLD I START??
I DON'T OWN A SWITCH SO I AM GOING TO INSULT EVERYONE WHO DOES AND CALL ALL THE GAMES FOR THAT CONSOLE CRAP WITHOUT GIVING ANY REASON FOR IT!!! GYAAAAAH!
WWE 2k 18 is bad.
The Myth Also BOTW? What a snore amirite? MORE OF THE SAME.
oh no. someone insulted us. what can we do?
also get a switch you normie.
All the games are one of the best games of the era
Living proof why metacritic doesn't work.
We need to just get over numerical review scores anyway in general as a concept. They just end up being bullshit far too often, get people worked up for no reason, people just looking at the number at the end instead of reading the actual review to get the context, etc.
Stick to the same formula: “it’s the same old repetitive bs! Blah blah blah”
When they change the formula: “this isn’t the game I grew up playing! Wah wah wah”
*Do you need your bib and blankie too?*
The people who said this game is easy should play the darker side.
Too easy 😏
0:14 all the sonic fans in a nut shell
but im a sonic fan. am i a *false* sonic fan?
what is life?
imsuicidalyoulflottoosackboi
Yeah it’s apparently a rip-off of sonic adventures and a living hat is the dumbest thing he’s seen in a videos game
Lol ok I'm a sonic fan and I know it was a joke, but it hit a little close to home.
Savage Bird or maybe he's just part of a loud minority. Most sonic fans aren't that dumb
That Guy Gaming yeah most sonic fans are pretty smart and good people. Sorry if I offended anyone with the joke I do realize that it's a minority of fans that act like that.
Obviusly these people never got 999 moons
RubiesAnimations i love the game and i can barely get 500 moons.
I have 600 after 40 hours of constant moon collecting
Because getting 999 moons is pointless. After a certain point you'd just be grinding for coins.
"Oh, my gosh, he's got a spoon!" -guy who saw that salmonid in the background
To all the peeps complaining about Mario doing the same stick over and over....??I say that if it ain't broke...why bother fixing it??
Thank you.
Ah yes, why innovate when we can be the Michael Bay of video game design. Just look at the Transformers movies, they are shit, but they make money so why fix em am i right?
Butter Jam Jimbo No, the formula works for Mario, it's not like Michael Bay movies. People enjoy it, unlike those movies.
I'm all for innovation, but that argument is terrible. The main point was "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". Michael Bay movies are 'broke'. They need fixing. They are -not- a good example of something that happens to be fine and may avoid getting fixed.
*game literally has new mechanic of possessing enemies to gain new abilities, and a throwable platform
“Wow there’s no innovation is this game whatsoever”