Im with her. She is paying taxes for all that land so it is hers. If the government want it to be a park then buy it from her. It’s not just about taxes or land it’s also about a liability issue. If any of those people get hurt there they could sue her
No. She's in the right here. It's her land. If the state wants to buy it back, so be it. Pay her. Which means park rangers will clean up the shit now, not her.
Since Anthony Lee refuses to let the shirt be released, I propose a "We Believe" shirt with the same design but with all the careful boyz besides the non believer
Property laws are weird, most places you don't actually own the land and it's "real estate" (where you're basically buying rights to do stuff above the ground of the land you're marked at). On top of that, this sounds like water rights issues, which is usually more of a farming thing. The sellers definitely should have disclosed the status of the land.
Sadly, that is a very hard situation and the new owner is absolutely right but she in a no win situation. Even is she won the angry people will make her life a living hell.
I heard in Japan that there's no rubbish on the street because citizens there tend to take their rubbish to dispose of at home. Different culture and respect.
Definitely, they need to pay her if they want it back so badly. Was it considered private property by former owners who just let people in or was it always public property and the sellers just made it look like its their creek? I still blame the seller either way.
That’s easy to solve build a gun range if possible and put signs that say live range or put bear traps or other traps if all else fails build a wall or dam
Happens a lot with fisherman being accused of trespassing by new landowners owners who don't know the rules. No one owns the rivers or the big enough creeks so it is legal to travel up and down them and its not considered trespassing so long as you stay below the high water line. Its based of history of rivers and waterways being the original highways around and meant the trade of goods could happen more freely back in the day. Think twice when you see a property that says "Private Creek"
That's not true cause her land is on both side thats the issue aswell keep in mind fisherman are on the sea / lake not the land itself there a difference
In Mississippi my family owns a large track of land that has a creek running through it. While we don’t own the water, we own the ground that is below the water and the land on both sides of the bank. Anyone is free to float down the creek, but the moment your feet, vehicle or boat touch the ground that we own under the water you are trespassing. And we routinely deal with people trespassing thinking they have a right to use the land the water runs through when they only have a right to float down the creek above our ground. So this statement if patently false. In each state there are different laws regarding waterways that intersect private property, if she had been in Mississippi she would have won on the basis she owned the ground and that the people couldn’t cross her property access it without permission. Now in Louisiana she would have lost on the basis that an existing easement existed because it had been granted by previous owners continuously for 5 years even though it wasn’t on paper. But Colorado has its own unique laws, so that’s why it went to court because the easement wasn’t officially recorded.
Currently our neighbor's house is up for sale with the sale pending. I have witnessed a land surveyor come by and map out the property, even though it is surrounded on all sides by a fence. Perhaps the woman should higher a land surveyor to map out exactly where her established property lines are, as she moves forward with her legal action.
Getting a survey should be common practice. It's not that expensive and good insurance for headaches. Sometimes fences and even driveways, sheds or houses were built partially on another property. Especially in instances where family or good friends were neighbors.
Had the same reaction with Bart about the due diligence. lol Part of that due diligence would have been spent researching about that creek. Laws that cover natural resources.
Why would she think she would need to if she was told the creek was hers? She wasn't told it's a public creek that happens to go through her backyard, she was sort of led to believe it was her creek on her land. In this situation and as far as she knew then, these aren't natural resources, it's her home.
I remember this story, the problem was the people were leaving a mess and causing damage to her land so she had enough and didn't want them trespassing anymore
Technically the water belongs to the people but they can’t step foot on her land. So if you were on a kayak you could be on the water; however, you cannot step foot onto their land.
Was this water natural or created by the persons who previously owned the land? I don’t think water should be owned if it is natural. All animals and plants, including humans, use water to cool down when it’s hot. It’s nonsense for the people who live in the area to not be allowed to use a body of water for that purpose. Does the water even belong to the previous owner? If it was sold to the new owner under the claim it belonged to the previous person but didn’t, does it even make sense?
At first i thought i would just ignore the situation, then discovering how close it is to where i would actually be living i would wonder how much the noise would intrude. But i dont know what id be liable for with what ever is going on at the creek?
Nah if she was smart shed charge a cover fee and have a good chunk towards her mortgage every month haha but i do agree eith her, if she decided she doesent want qnyone tjere she has full rights and the fact that its even being discussed shows where we are wt in society now a days
Every time hear joe talk. So much experience still so little wisdom. Nothing learned just changing with the wind. He is lucky he got some good friends.without them he would have been 😊😊😊
"Share the Land" Have you been around? Have you done your share of coming down? On different things that people do? Have you been aware? You got brothers and sisters who care About what's going to happen to you In a year from now? Maybe I'll be there to shake your hand (Shake your hand), Maybe I'll be there to share the land (Share the land) That they'll be giving away When we all live together, we're talking about together, now! Maybe I'll be there to shake your hand (Shake your hand), Maybe I'll be there to share the land (Share the land) That they'll be giving away When we all live together, we're talking about together, now! -- The Guess Who (~1970) Karen: "Get off my lawn and out of my creek!"
Im with her. She is paying taxes for all that land so it is hers. If the government want it to be a park then buy it from her. It’s not just about taxes or land it’s also about a liability issue. If any of those people get hurt there they could sue her
No. She's in the right here. It's her land. If the state wants to buy it back, so be it. Pay her. Which means park rangers will clean up the shit now, not her.
Since Anthony Lee refuses to let the shirt be released, I propose a "We Believe" shirt with the same design but with all the careful boyz besides the non believer
OHH MY GOD. NOOOO! Make the we believe golden state warriors jerseys, but have the numbers be 911 and the name is just "Proof?"
@@kennynguyen5910 had me until the warriors jersey😭 I'm not wearing those colors bruh
Personally I like the allure of that shirt being exclusive to the Careful Boyz & Jason Cheny looool
But i’m 1000% with you on not wearing Warriors type shit 😅😅
Nahhh that’s messing it up
Property laws are weird, most places you don't actually own the land and it's "real estate" (where you're basically buying rights to do stuff above the ground of the land you're marked at). On top of that, this sounds like water rights issues, which is usually more of a farming thing. The sellers definitely should have disclosed the status of the land.
Sadly, that is a very hard situation and the new owner is absolutely right but she in a no win situation. Even is she won the angry people will make her life a living hell.
Sounds like a village of idiots
I heard in Japan that there's no rubbish on the street because citizens there tend to take their rubbish to dispose of at home. Different culture and respect.
She just made a post that she was paid and the county took that portion of the land back. So...everything was settled.
It was settled in May of 2023.
Definitely, they need to pay her if they want it back so badly. Was it considered private property by former owners who just let people in or was it always public property and the sellers just made it look like its their creek? I still blame the seller either way.
Literally should just charge people to be there. I don't understand. I bet the city will make an appropriate distinction at that point😅
It’s her house not a amusement park
it’s called an easement. That’s something people should look into before buying land
That’s easy to solve build a gun range if possible and put signs that say live range or put bear traps or other traps if all else fails build a wall or dam
but she would disconnect more with the community!!!!! you want her to die alone?!
Happens a lot with fisherman being accused of trespassing by new landowners owners who don't know the rules. No one owns the rivers or the big enough creeks so it is legal to travel up and down them and its not considered trespassing so long as you stay below the high water line. Its based of history of rivers and waterways being the original highways around and meant the trade of goods could happen more freely back in the day. Think twice when you see a property that says "Private Creek"
That's not true cause her land is on both side thats the issue aswell keep in mind fisherman are on the sea / lake not the land itself there a difference
In Mississippi my family owns a large track of land that has a creek running through it. While we don’t own the water, we own the ground that is below the water and the land on both sides of the bank. Anyone is free to float down the creek, but the moment your feet, vehicle or boat touch the ground that we own under the water you are trespassing. And we routinely deal with people trespassing thinking they have a right to use the land the water runs through when they only have a right to float down the creek above our ground.
So this statement if patently false. In each state there are different laws regarding waterways that intersect private property, if she had been in Mississippi she would have won on the basis she owned the ground and that the people couldn’t cross her property access it without permission.
Now in Louisiana she would have lost on the basis that an existing easement existed because it had been granted by previous owners continuously for 5 years even though it wasn’t on paper.
But Colorado has its own unique laws, so that’s why it went to court because the easement wasn’t officially recorded.
@@astphi860 it has nothing to do with easements its federal law. Google “navigable waterways”
She should have told the city that this is a private property and ask why the city allowing trespassing on private property?
Currently our neighbor's house is up for sale with the sale pending. I have witnessed a land surveyor come by and map out the property, even though it is surrounded on all sides by a fence. Perhaps the woman should higher a land surveyor to map out exactly where her established property lines are, as she moves forward with her legal action.
Getting a survey should be common practice. It's not that expensive and good insurance for headaches. Sometimes fences and even driveways, sheds or houses were built partially on another property. Especially in instances where family or good friends were neighbors.
I believe she already did , but the other people dont care and the county is basically suing her in a way
Problem solved. Turn it into a business. Make them pay to use.
Had the same reaction with Bart about the due diligence. lol
Part of that due diligence would have been spent researching about that creek. Laws that cover natural resources.
Why would she think she would need to if she was told the creek was hers? She wasn't told it's a public creek that happens to go through her backyard, she was sort of led to believe it was her creek on her land. In this situation and as far as she knew then, these aren't natural resources, it's her home.
1.5 million for the land , just take it and move somewhere else.
Just let her have the creek on the side of her home and visitors have to go on the other side of the creek.
I remember this story, the problem was the people were leaving a mess and causing damage to her land so she had enough and didn't want them trespassing anymore
I would be worried if someone got hurt. Then tried to sue
That's a lot of people.🧐 The video sounds and looks like a documentry you see 500 years from now or is that how it sounds like.
would a fence be a solution???
WHO CARES ABOUT THE COMMUNITY! They didn't care that it was her property and just expect her to let them destroy her land.
If land doesn’t belong to the seller and got sold to a new owner, does it belong to them?
To deal with pests, get an alligator
Technically the water belongs to the people but they can’t step foot on her land. So if you were on a kayak you could be on the water; however, you cannot step foot onto their land.
What they missed to talk about is that she has a recording with the previous owners were they admit to knowing they own that land
Happy New Year to y'all from Texas!
Happy New Year from New York. 🎉
The essences of the great wall
Sounds like someone that uses it. Knows some city officials
Private property for the public 🤨
Well yah it brings joy
@@imnugget8085😶😶😶😶
????@@imnugget8085
But what a someone were drown there or someone cuts their foot open, or a fire starts is she going to get sued?
Was this water natural or created by the persons who previously owned the land? I don’t think water should be owned if it is natural. All animals and plants, including humans, use water to cool down when it’s hot. It’s nonsense for the people who live in the area to not be allowed to use a body of water for that purpose. Does the water even belong to the previous owner? If it was sold to the new owner under the claim it belonged to the previous person but didn’t, does it even make sense?
I'm siding with the lady.
Her property her rules
The lady at first was nice let people access the creek, then people be people trashing the place and being disrespectful she said no more
At first i thought i would just ignore the situation, then discovering how close it is to where i would actually be living i would wonder how much the noise would intrude. But i dont know what id be liable for with what ever is going on at the creek?
Not in my American back yard
she is a Colorado native!
Anthony please release the shirt. Please 🙏 😂. I can’t stop thinking about the shirt ❤.
Colorado suck.
Yeah. I have lived different places. Title comoany? Did she get title insurance?
The border being the river itself is how the Mexico us border works.
Nah if she was smart shed charge a cover fee and have a good chunk towards her mortgage every month haha but i do agree eith her, if she decided she doesent want qnyone tjere she has full rights and the fact that its even being discussed shows where we are wt in society now a days
She could try, but how would she enforce it if the entire town is against her? I mean she should, but Idk how she would make sure they do.
I think the law is good. One should not be able to privately own piece of the river or beachline.
Yeah just resell it back to the goverment or something
Feel bad for her. They need to figure this out.
Ur background set up looks so much more dope YALL shoulve done this years ago now you have no viewsss
Honestly if this was japan no one would care cause we breakand leave trash thats the issue
That guy with the mom shirt is not saying very intelligent stuff. He just seems to be rambling on.
😂😂😂😂😂 this mf came to jknews thinking he was gonna find real intelligent conversations 😂😂😂😆 you cannot make this shit up
Someone needs to show her video to Native Americans, like a reaction video
40k for anyone who can beat me in HALO
Is Ryan sick ? Why is his voice deeper than usual?
Sounds like Palestine lol
hire me
Joe always taking the opportunity to shit on California even if the story has nothing to do with it lol
DAY 60 of begging that the *"SHOW ME PROOF"* tees are released as official merch
You're actually the first.
Day 4 of supporting this comment
What happened again?
@@CanPoreotics kinjaz propaganda. Ever heard of them
Reintroducing….Homeless Joe!! ;)
Every time hear joe talk. So much experience still so little wisdom. Nothing learned just changing with the wind. He is lucky he got some good friends.without them he would have been 😊😊😊
I’m making my own show me the proof shirt🤪😂
"Share the Land"
Have you been around?
Have you done your share of coming down?
On different things that people do?
Have you been aware?
You got brothers and sisters who care
About what's going to happen to you
In a year from now?
Maybe I'll be there to shake your hand (Shake your hand),
Maybe I'll be there to share the land (Share the land)
That they'll be giving away
When we all live together, we're talking about together, now!
Maybe I'll be there to shake your hand (Shake your hand),
Maybe I'll be there to share the land (Share the land)
That they'll be giving away
When we all live together, we're talking about together, now!
-- The Guess Who (~1970)
Karen: "Get off my lawn and out of my creek!"