Apollo 11 Launch - Flight Directors Loop
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- Apollo 11 launch from about T-5min to orbital insertion. The audio is the Flight Directors Loop - You hear the conversations at the Cape between launch control/mission control (in Houston) and the Apollo 11 crew. Post "Tower Clear" control is the responsibility of Cliff Charlesworth and his green team of flight controllers.
Video is the NASA TV feed and then simulated flight using the Orbiter/NASSP spaceflight simulator.
I would love to see more of these videos with the flight director's loop. The amount of information is endless with procedures and acronyms. I love it! Its truly educational from an engineering point of view.
I have put up as many FDLoops as I have. When I get some more I will do those too.
That would be awesome! I love the multiple conversations going on at once!
***** Thank you so much these are terrific.
aAaa aAaa , portions of both recordings are restricted due to consideration of the families involved. The transcripts provide true and accurate records of the transmissions without putting stress on families. Maybe years from now the restriction will be released but it will be a while.
@Bill_N_ATX What the hell are you talking about? And to whom?
Why would they be restricted due to considerations for the families? If you're talking about the recordings from the Apollo One fire, those recordings have been public for a long long time.
Still amazing what NASA could achieve so many years ago in such a short period of time ... from knowing almost nothing about space launch to landing a man on the moon and return them safely to earth.
It was full-country effort, like there was a war on, or something. We can do many great things if everyone could just get along.🇺🇸
Fantastic. I remember this. It is etched on my brain. I was only five at the time but I do remember sitting with my Dad and seeing this on Tv. Sadly he is no longer with us, but this is a memory I shall take to the grave. Thank you for putting it on here.
Shaun Leverett You are most welcome Shaun - thanks for sharing your treasured memories with us all - regards LM5
Sorry for your loss... God bless you and your loved ones.... including those that have passed.
Shaun Leverett it reminds me of my dad too, who i lost in May. Reaching for the heavens... God Bless all of those we have lost
I was 8 y.o. when my grandpa watched it with me. We already lost Neil, but it was fantastic.
I was 11. And my freshman HS science teacher worked for NASA from the beginning to Apollo 14.
la hazaña mas grande de la humanidad.
Why the CGI?
+kassop Because no cameras in space?
Because there were no cameras to film it in space...
One of the proudest moments of my young life at age 12. They say moments like that you remember the rest of your life. That flight is a clear in my mind as when it was happening in 1969. I had followed the space program as a kid and realized it seemed to take longer than I expected for the landing to happen. Then, Buzz's voice over the comm loop. "Okay, engine stop. ACA out of detent." I said to my Dad..."they're there." A few years later, as a young radio news reporter, I got to meet Neil Armstrong while he was teaching at the University of Cincinnati and actually got to spend about 20 minutes just shooting the breeze with him. A very likeable man. At least I can tell grandkids about meeting the first human being to walk on another planet.
Kevin Fodor First that we know of.
Yeah kid, they landed the top heavy LEMon at an angle ( as well as on an angle, by the look some of their 1840s quality imagery ( Now I've got the pioneers of photography wanting to haunt me?)
If the thing tumbles over ( something it was good at doing on Earth) the astro nots have an extended stay on the Moon ( very extended)
The moon is not another planet. It's a moon.
*celestial body
I am in project management these days and my mind always goes back to watching these launches and landings when I was a kid. Watching everything come together as we approach our objectives, both large and small, makes me feel like I am there in Mission Control. It's inspirational to me. I hope future generations get to experience something like this.
Shows what determination can do. Between 1960 and 1970 we went from sub orbital flight to putting men on the moon and returning them safely. All this was accomplished with 1960s technology. Yet despite enormous technological advances over the last 40+ years, we have not done anything since. We have not been back to the moon, we have not been to Mars, yet we have spent countless billions and lost 14 lives putting people in low earth orbit. We will never get anywhere that way.
"Yet despite enormous technological advances over the last 40+ years, we
have not done anything since. We have not been back to the moon, we have
not been to Mars, yet we have spent countless billions and lost 14
lives putting people in low earth orbit. We will never get anywhere that
way."
Mentally challanged.
As of 2019, more time passed between John Glenn's Flight and today than did between the Wright Brother's flight and John Glenn's.
vulcan1753 because our government and nation doesn’t have either the want or need to go back .... the only person that does want to go back truly is the guy from spaceX
Not done anything since? We have a space station in orbit for over 25 years, we've sent probes that are still working almost 50 years later outside the solar system, rocket launches nearly every single day, launch and booster return to ground, we have active rovers and landers on Mars, he have a telescope in space that can see back in time to the origin of the universe. We're planning to get to Mars soon, and the moon again soon. We've gone from rare and classified levels of tech for space launches to being able to hold a computer in our hand that is far more powerful than the tech of the 60's.- and we owe ALL of that to the space program.
I remember this I was 13 yrs old at the time it still amaze me to this day that we went to the moon and came back
Always love to hear the Flight Director's loop during these launches. Nice to listen to the calming voice of Cliff Charlesworth again.
And Bruce McCandless!
@natureandphysics1442 Love Bruce McCandless. For person to perform an untethered space walk by using the MMU (Manned Manned Maneuvering Unit).
I agree, then Gene Kranz when they landed on the moon.
Mom,you made sure me and sis saw this....I was young and sis was younger but I remember this and I thank you to have us see this.I was 9 but I remember this now,thank you Mom for making sure me and sis witnessed this....thank you Mom,your son Danny.
DWH BOI I like comments like yours; gives a real personal account of these missions...thanks for sharing it - LM5
+DWH BOI I was in the US NAVY 1963-1973, and can assure you that THIS launch, and all the others, were well covered by Military TV channels
DWH BOI I was five when this happened, and I read everything about Apollo I could get my hands on. My parents got me out of bed for this (my older sister had expressed no interest, and slept on).
Thank you so, much, mum and dad! I'm as much an Apollo junkie today, but with far more disposable income to spend on books, DVDs, memorabilia ate.
Nicely done - I would have liked to have seen a viewpoint from inside the command module, but otherwise, excellent. I love what you can recreate with Orbiter. Think I'll reinstall it.
Watch the Apollo Soyez launch it shows the guys during ascent, quite neat to see that.
Even as early as Apollo 11, this sounds so routine, but we all know that’s not really the case. The crew and ground sound so calm and collected. Just glad all went well!
I was there!
that's what really matters. i bet hearing those engines was absolutely astounding! not everyone gets to see 6.5 million tonnes of strait up raw power lift into orbit. you sir are a credit to the dawn of the age of rocketry and space travel.
Juno Berries 3000 tons, actually. not to take away from the beauty of it, though.
I wish I was there
@@ferret1337
Actually, the Saturn 5 had 7.5 million pounds of thrust moving 6.1 million pounds at liftoff. So yes, 3000 tons. Amazon.
Cliff Charlesworth is so incredibly calm under pressure. Sounds like he could take a nap at any moment.
I'm born in 1968, too young to understand that, but made my first step on july 20th 1969, my first step on earth. It was a big step for me, absolutely no interest for mankind ;-)
There is nothing better than NASA-TALK. I love this non-emotional technical stuff. WHO WAS "ROGER" ANYWAY? Just listen to 4.20 to 5.00 and tell me you don't love it !
"In the pipe, five-by-five!"
Great video! I always preferred the live video feeds that the launch controllers saw, rather than what the TV networks chose to show the public.
What a fortunate circumstance that Earth gravity allows this. We can only get about 2% of launch weight to orbit. A little bit more gravity and we'd be stuck on here. :)
+oversoul
Not necessarily, but it would be MUCH harder to reach orbit. By that I mean the payload capacity for any given rocket would be greatly reduced.
Man - that humming sound on the audio. It takes me back to my childhood, watching on television. When I heard that sound, I knew something big, something important was about to happen......
Some people can't comprehend or appreciate the intelligence and dedication. They argue it was a hoax.
Simply amazing. The fact that humans were able to build this hardware and then figure out how to use it. And the fact that they thought of everything to make the flight successful.
So cool :-))) the largest group of the smartest men ever assembled toward one goal. Greatest achievement ever.
LM5, until I 'found' your video, I was bereft of the conversation between the CM and the Ground prior to launch. I have purchased a few DVDs from SF. But even on the A11, Man on the Moon, this pre launch chatter is absent.
The first lunar landing was obviously a monumental achievement. A lot of drama associated with the Apollo 11 launch but folks forget that 2 prior missions to the moon had already been successfully launched previously.
mike reece yes but only as flybys
@@jimlives09 only !
i don't forget it. Apollo VIII was a magnificent accomplishment.
Look at that huge flame!!!! I mean compared to that, the rocket, which is gigantic, looks like a flippen point on a dart!!
I was five years old when I saw this, too. I remember seeing some of the later Gemini reports on tv. Amazing what gets etched into the neurons.
Just this past Friday I was inspecting some components going to ULA for one of their rockets. It feels so great to be a part of this!
These loops were recently redigitized a couple of years ago. The original reel to real tapes were hung one last time and recorded with the latest equipment and lossless codecs. They sound amazing good when you consider they were recorded on what was basically a multitrack monitoring recorder, not a set of high fidelity recorders.
2014: Where are we now? I hope we can find a way to create a sense of urgency before being eclipsed.
I remember seeing the liftoff . what an amazing sight and feeling . im glad growing up in this era
Seeing amazing accomplishments of America when it was a proud moment to be a citizen of the United States. God speed Neil and Buzz and Mike
Man, we gotta figure out anti-gravity.. Getting out of earth orbit takes a launch vehicle where some 90% of the weight is fuel..
i was 12 years old in 1969.. still amazing... several books written on apollo program great reads ..
Tom Bender So was I ... 12 years old and reading every scientific journal or magazine I could get my hands on! I was SO ready to become a pilot so I could advance toward my REAL dream ... being an astronaut! Boy, were those the days!!! :-)
I was 10 years old and watched this :)
me too. i was ten.
watched every minute of apollo in utter awe.
arcticcap I was -31 years old
I was 8 but remember that mission like it was yesterday. The excitement was palpable for kids and parents alike.
Look at that hellish beast as it goes off... amazing!
E: was it Jim Lovell as CAPCOM that day?
McCandless ...Capcom for Apollo 11 launch was Bruce McCandless ...hope that helps -LM5
It did thanks.
Fooled me, too. I thought it sounded a lot like Lovell, but he was on the backup crew which meant that he was at the Cape, I think.
It was Bruce Mccandless
I remember when I watched a lot of the Apollo flights it always seemed like Charlie Duke was CAPCOM. I loved this stuff. You say those names now and they don't mean anything to later generations but to us they are legends.
I love the video and the use of Bluedog Design Bureau..❤❤❤❤
Crazy how the Saturn is just suspended before launch on but a few hard points above a cavernous flame trench. It's just barely locked down after its trip from the VAB. Yet those hard points have to hold the ship as the S-1C builds up thrust; then let go simultaneously within milliseconds. Lovell, Scott, Young, and Cernan all did this twice.
There were four hold down arms.
I watched First Man against last night, and I think it sucked. Neal looked like someone shat in his cornflakes. It was such a stupid movie. I know they tried to make it like it was the real Neal, but all you have to do is listen to this and watch real interviews.
I have only watched it once - alongside a lot of movies on space there is a lot of artistic licence taken - but I have always thought that if they showed it like actual real life then the movie wouldn't be "exciting" enough. Factual space subject is a difficult subject to show on a big screen. Apart from the series "From the Earth to the Moon" (I do not think there has been a better dramatisation of space events) I cannot think of a TV show or movie that have done the subject proud. The trouble is, we know what the reality was....any deviation from what we know happened raises our eyebrows and makes us feel that the subject matter has not been treated with the respect we believe it should be accorded. Ask the general public their thoughts and it will be 180 degrees from a space enthusiast with a good knowledge of the subject. With 1st Man I think they played on a perceived remoteness of Neil, which. true or not, was overplayed. Just my thoughts on it - regards LM5
@@lunarmodule5 I'm a screenwriter. I've done a lot of dialogue. The launch sequence was devoid of much of anything. And Neil Armstrong was focused. Ryan Gosling's performance made it look like he was on another planet. Also, after his ejection from the LLRV, the only injury he got was biting his tongue. When he got finished, he went back to the office he shared with Al Bean and just said he bit his tongue. It was no big deal.
Always wondered why everyone was on the same com. Years later a man that worked the control room told me it was because any one person could speak up and be heard if needed. He said that a tape was reviewed and as many as 30 people were carrying on 12 conversations. He said after a while you were used it and all the voices were no big deal. Heck I can understand my wife in a crowded Resturaunt. LOL
Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou
You are welcome!
That would have been something to see. Simply amazing.
Used some of the audio for an intro, such an awesome moment in time.
I love this particularly because it doesn't have the public affairs track talking over the flight control team
I have looked EVERYWHERE for this! Finally I can hear Cliff say "Apollo 11," before "this is Houston. You are GO for staging." FINALLY!!!
FANNTASTIC!!! Neil would of loved this.
Can you imagine the balls it would take to get on that? The pinicical of human expression. I was 9 years old. Wish some would go back a show all the moon deniers they are all wrong.
Someday....
yep..someday soon
At 17:35 are they giving their apogee and perigee? "101.4 by 103.6" sounds like a roughly circularised orbit in nautical miles.
Yep - its the initial calculation of the orbit
@obaeyens: If I correctly interpret your reference to "that big leaver thing", that is one of the three tail service masts that facilitated propellant delivery to and electrical connections with the SI-C.
What is the "glycol" valve to bypass that the STC tells Armstrong to switch at 3:19?
That valve is used to keep the spacecraft coolant circuit (glycol) to not go through the radiators. It is set to bypass during two phases of the mission - during launch and during CM/SM separation (just before re-entry).
just crazy amazing!
I remember seeing this live. Damn, it still gives me chills.
It will always give me goosebumps, even 53 years later. Incredible.
Amazing how quickly the exhaust plume changes shape as air pressure drops with altitude. (Overexpanded/underexpanded)
Listening to the way these guys dealt with the most momentous rocket launch in history is amazing. It's almost as if they're running a sim for the 12th time that day and they're bored with it.
It's amazing how calm the astronauts are riding on that thing. Up there cracking jokes 😆
Hey the finally gave me a window lol
Must be Mike Collins
CDR is "Commander" and refers to Armstrong. LMP is "Lunar Module Pilot", meaning Buzz Aldrin. CMP stands for "Command Module Pilo"t, which is Michael Collins.
No Lightning strike no party! Viva Pete Conrad!
Your not kidding, I read about him in Gene Kranz's book.
Do they shut the main engine, coast to apoapsys and then circularize the orbit? or is it a "all in one" continuous burn and when the S-IVB shut down the orbit is already circular and perfect?
Yes.
I was almost 6 but my dad had built all the flex hoses on this flight. We were proud but scared at the same time. NSTL tested all the engines for the Saturn-Apollo mission.
Not sure why Orbiter thinks that the daytime earthward side of a rocket should be in shadow. The shuttle spent most of its time in orbit with its payload bay facing earth and during daytime passes the bay was lit up with a bright but diffuse esrth shine. In Orbiter that shadowed side of the SIVB ought to be a little brighter than it appears on screen.
Allways wondered...what does "mark one bravo and mark mode one charley" mean.
They were abort modes.
Mode 1 was abort using the Launch Escape System Tower and the A/B/C was how the LES maneuvered the CM after its separation from the stack (from 0ft to 19 miles). Mode 2 was an abort using the SPS engine on the SM to get the CSM off the stack after the LES was jettisoned. Mode 3 was the same as mode 2 but included the CSM turning around and doing a Falcon 9 boost back type burn with the SPS to avoid landing on land in Africa. Mode 4 was an abort to orbit using the SPS on the CSM. There were two other abort modes which involved an abort to orbit using the S-4IV stage (and SPS) if the S-II stage failed
as an 8 year old kid watching this originally-this is the best. its just so GREAT. this simulation is awesome.
Is there a apollo 11 full mission?
Spacecraft Films have produced an Apollo 11 Dvd which presents the mission like the Full Mission series but probably without the animation (I have not seen it yet). Mark Gray is contactable at the SCF website so I would suggest you have a look on his site toi see the availability of that DVD. I do not at present have plans to do Apollo 11, but maybe in the future!
APOLLO 계획 ROCKET 발사
대기중 입니다 ! 잠시후 발사
지구를 떠나가는 로케트 우주선
Imagine where we would be today if there were never a need to spend time and resources on machines of war.
They would never have landed on the moon.
Tools are tools. It's us humans who configure those tools for destruction and advancement.
The Tool Guy Better advancements have been made in Physics and aerospace engineering!
The Tool Guy Nice choice of words you intelligent human being
the mission was really to scare the hell out of the russians and show them that the US had vastly greater capability in the face of numerous russian rocket failures. several rockets were supposedly lost and were claimed to be "unmanned" in the face of disaster. this was a flex of nuclear might as much as it was a pursuit in human achievement. without the cold war there would have not been a space race.
My mum was 19 in 1969 and my dad was 16. Neither remember the moon landings.
I do wonder sometimes.
Excuse me my ignorance, how was this filmed ?
With film and video cameras.
Simulated video........why no "original" footage ?
because in the 60s and 70s there were no real time cameras on rockets showing the launches as they do today. Once the rocket was out of sight of airborne or ground based cameras that was the last that was seen. Even in the Shuttle programme cameras were not attached to the External Tank until the early 2000's
Great stuff! How were the animations in high atmosphere made?
Magnificent camerawork 11:22.
i thought this was ksp when i saw the thumb nail
I wonder why there was no beep tone on mic release.
One day, the'll make electric cars as quite as the rocket at 11:22
Classic Just Classic!!!
does anyone know if there is an animation showing the sun earth and the moon with real time distance and speeds for this expedition?
+Tj Vliet or if you could answer directly some questions for me this would be great. 1. How fast was the module traveling when returning to earth from the moons orbit?
+Tj Vliet i calculated like 75,000 mph which can't be right, can it. no way they re-entered at that speed. and they didn't have a way to slow down.....
+Tj Vliet Velocity at Entry Interface (400,000 feet altitude, Noun 60): 36,194 feet/second (11,032 metres/second). I got this from "history.nasa.gov/ap11fj/26day9-reentry.htm"
+Tj Vliet Also, 36,194 feet/second is approximately 24,678 mph.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the voice that says "they finally gave me a window to look out!" after tower jettison is Gene Cernan....he wasn't on Apollo 11.
Hi Dirt - it was Mike Collins' voice, not Gene. Hope that helps
That's Mike Collins talking about the window.
mike collins
dirtroad30
Cernan was on Apollo 17.
Hi can anyone explain whereabouts the windows were on the section that left earth's orbit and travelled to the moon. Can't see clearly from diagrams I have searched for. Thanks
it's so sad that it blew up. when i was in school my teacher actually wrote to one of the astronauts father's and he wrote back sending little poems in memory of him.
sir maverick - I think you’re talking about the space shuttle. Different mission. Different spacecraft. Different astronauts.
what?
Glaube Mut Liebe.
11:08, the big rockets are gone. we are in low Earth orbit ( at night too but we don't look for stars & can't remember not looking ( we certainly didn't see, not even when we were behind the Moon))
& in LEO the gravity is almost as strong as back on terrible firma.
&,,, NO YOU PRAWNS THIS ISN'T A PROBE WITH A WEIGHT = TO A HARLEY (without rider t's the weight of a loaded semi & has to fight Earths gravity for hundreds of thousand miles from here.
It's amazing how well the Germans made this rocket.
in this vidio up to 9 min 4 sec the picture was not clear but after that it has so much clear , even we can see the name painted on it. were are the camera for that????? and wonderfull thing is some object is mooving bacground is that U F O or a house flly?????hahaha
+Edirisinghe Jayamini
Please tell me this is some kind of joke.
At 9:00 the video switches to a simulator. It's what the launch would have looked like from the outside. The object you saw is the launch escape tower, which was jettisoned out in front of the rocket.
5:26
nice shots but i ask my self how dow thr dow this to film it with sattelite cameras dow any body here knows how thr filming this
tom de groot the later parts are shown with a simulator ....not real footage
So did they send cameras out through air-vent-hatches to film this from the outside?
Elias Boysen the later parts of this video was filmed with a simulator ....not real footage
KSP WHUT
Lovell at CapCom?
Bruce McCandless
kerbal space program. It's like a NASA simulator but done in a rather more game approach rather than a simulator