Michael Sandel: Populism, Trump, and the Future of Democracy
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 кві 2018
- PLEASE NOTE: THIS VIDEO IS AUDIO ONLY.
Like the triumph of Brexit in the UK, the election of Donald Trump was an angry verdict on decades of rising inequality and a version of globalization that benefits those at the top but leaves ordinary people feeling disempowered. In this lecture, renowned philosopher Michael Sandel argues that before mainstream parties can hope to win back public support, they should learn from the populist protest that has displaced them-not by replicating its xenophobia and strident nationalism, but by taking seriously the legitimate grievances with which these ugly sentiments are entangled. These grievances are not only economic but also moral and cultural; they are not only about wages and jobs but also about social esteem.
4:15
I'm currently watching justice on UA-cam and it is outstanding.
4 themes: income inequality, meritocratic hubris, the dignity of work, patriotism and national community.
It's 2020, who is watching/listening?
He has said everything I have been trying to express but struggling to find the proper way to put together... I hope every left wing progressive liberals can take some time to listen to this.
Thank you so much for this program.
Thank you Mr. Sandel!
A good analysis that does also a good job of providing a set of solutions that complements Mark Blyth's work.
You are so brave and thank you sir
If politicians listened more to philosophers like Michael Sandel, then things in the world would be much more just and good.
I highly recommend his books, too!
The concept of "intolerance" is made to do work it cannot perform in Sandel's argument. It begs the question of what is problematic about so-called populist arguments, because to be intolerant of the right things is what morality should obligate us to be. Both 'tolerance' and 'intolerance' are morally neutral concepts. Tolerance is better than intolerance in the same sense that 'change' is better than the status quo. Everything hinges on what, specifically, we are talking about.
I miss that town
prosím rozoberte Koncentračný tábor Sektor 1 a Zdravotnícky
I was afraid to hear what Michael's opinion was on Trump but am extremely pleased to have heard his objective view. Thank you for reason and answers.
I can sense his desperation and panic in his voice. It must feel good to take off the disguise and reveal one’s true color.
outstanding
Stále tu není vyriešená odpoveď na otázku kto je vini General alebo Doktor mimo obete a Hitlera ktorého postávali pred tribúny a predali vojnu územia z môžete od povedať na otazku z ktoré univerzity vyšla WW2
Don't deficits matter?
So much of this seems like something that anyone with basic common sense could have said. What would be much more interesting would be some solution to the problem of inequality in America, which no one seems to have. It's clear that there are these problems. We've heard about them over and over again