Its probably a good idea to mention the m+2 peak which can be a dead giveaway that the compound has chlorine or bromine in it: If it has chlorine then, due to the roughly 1:3 ratio of Cl-37 to Cl:35 there will be a isotopic peak at m+2 roughly 1/3 the size of the molecular ion peak If the compound has bromine in it, due to the roughly equal abundance of the +2 isotope of bromine, the m+2 peak will be roughly equal in size to the molecular ion peak
Its probably a good idea to mention the m+2 peak which can be a dead giveaway that the compound has chlorine or bromine in it:
If it has chlorine then, due to the roughly 1:3 ratio of Cl-37 to Cl:35 there will be a isotopic peak at m+2 roughly 1/3 the size of the molecular ion peak
If the compound has bromine in it, due to the roughly equal abundance of the +2 isotope of bromine, the m+2 peak will be roughly equal in size to the molecular ion peak
isnt this wrong 3:26
Radius should be inversely proprotional to mass.
THe heavier the ion, the less it deflects
you are amazing
wallahi im finished
GOAT