en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arleigh_Burke-class_destroyer The US Destroyer Class is a bit lighter (displacement) yet has 96 VLS Cells, the German F126 only 16 VLS Cells (plus 8 mid sized anti ship missiles with rather limited range) ... advertising the module "Gewahrsam" results in most likely the worlds most expensive seldomly used (we do not hunt the pirates really) prison cell. The full leadership of the German Military Purchasing Department was fired some weeks back yet sadly sent to early interment on full payment ...
For a country that prides itself in its own efficiency the german armed forces have the worst expense/capabilities ratio i have ever seen,they spend as much as France and the UK while having 1/5th of their capabilities. Truly astonishing
we are not priding ourselfs any more. After 1945 and realising what we have done to our neighbours, please forgive us, that we are a bit shy to spend money for guns.
@@hartmutwrith3134 What i mean is Germany spends a lot of money for essentially nothing. No carriers,no ocean going surface fleet,no stealth aircrafts,no nuclear subs,no airlift capability,only a mere 200 tanks. There's nothing that justifies the 50+ billions euros spent. I just wonder where are the money going.
@@ThisTheAviator Explain to me how an aircraft carrier should help Germany? Germany is working on an Fcas with France and Spain. To what extent does Germany need nuclear submarines? These are only good for the attack, in terms of being silent, they are not even close to the level of an A212. I agree with you that the procurement is bad, but you are wrong on many points. Also, things may get better with the newest government.
Considering that the Zumwalt class was a screwup that failed to deliver most of the capabilities it promised and was cancelled after only three mindboggingly expensive ships, that is a rather low bar to clear...
It looks great. But... according to the information provided in the video and the comments on here; if the loadout of these future ships are going to be tiny, then Germany is basically repeating the same actions that the interwar German government did with the Konigsberg and Leipzig-class light cruisers in the 1920s-1930s. Granted, the old Weimar Republic was under the restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles and the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922. But as far as I'm aware, modern-day Germany isn't under any sort of arms or armament buildup restrictions... are they? If not, then what's the German government's excuse for not arming these 10,000-ton (to hell with it, I'm calling them 'light cruisers') ships to the teeth? And if they are, is that the reason why these ships are going to be lightly armed? Oh well, maybe when Germany and the Netherlands get around to the "Future Air Defender" project (they're calling that one a 'Frigate' as well, but judging by the looks of the concept art, it looks like a beefed up version of the current F126, so I'm going to call it a 'medium cruiser'), it will have more weapons and a meaner punch compared to the F126.
Germany just do not call them distroyers cause of its history. If you compare the length- here it is 166m- it is the size of a ship that other nations call distroyer
Germanys last destroyer was from the USA! All other Ship are frigates! All of them worked pretty good and german frigates are more powerful than some destroyers... BTW the F-126 isn't a destroyer! This is a new Shiptype never exist! It called MCV (Multi-purpose combat vessel) or in german MKS (Mehrzweckkampfschiff)!
Same for the last generation of new frigates. Couple that with five times the original price and you understand what most of the german public is already used to
If only one of them is delivered over the span of 8 years, isn't that a bit too little, even for the military? Only certain projects like stealth aircraft take that long, if not longer, to produce.
@@seargesoren9391 Man 90% of that time is developement. Building it will ofc not take 8 years. Maybe 1. And then there will be an additional one every year.
@@seargesoren9391 I think they'd build several of them simultaneously. You're right that it's going to be late, but the Bundeswehr has been starved of money for almost two decades, and only within the last five years or so has the defense budget ballooned, in good part due to a certain incident at Crimea demonstrating that Europe is unfortunately not quite as peaceful as people hoped it would remain after the 90s.
@@emhyrvaremreis4540 64 ESSM meaning no SM-2, SM-3, SM-6, cruise missile, ASROC or any future hypersonic missiles. so clearly 16 VLS is pathetic and useless especially for a ship the size of a fucking cruise ship. the russians build 2500t covettes with more VLS than this 10.000t frigate. it's a joke and an exercise in "we don't need weapons because there is no war"
Keep in mind that german and dutch shipbuilders have a long history , The sachsen and zeven provincien class frigates ( well destroyers in reality) are of a same project slightly different but at the core the same. the Bremen class was based on the kortenaer class frigates , the current Kareldoorman JSS is shared with the germans. even before ww1 and ww2 both nations provided eachother with inovations and technologies . Most well know are the Battleship plans for the dutch in 1912-1913 , the java class cruisers. during ww1 and battle cruisers of 1939. In turn dutch IVS and INKAVOS provided the german navy with much information on building U-boats. And with firms like Hazemeyer ( later holland signaal , Thales netherlands) Siderious ,NSF , Philips etc tons of new tech and inovations where created . Its a verry long and complicated history but well worth a read.
As a German i think that Germany does well looking to the Netherlands regards naval ships, while i think that the Netherlands does well looking to Germany regards to land forces. And the combined efforts today are leading us to a better future!
@@jeroenjanssen6870 Gues again , as holland signaal merged with thales , thales netherlands is still dutch with the majority of the stock in hand of the dutch goverment, Every radar system en sensor system created comes from thales netherlands dutch inovation dutch invention dutch empoyees . Its just like AIrfrance Klm they might look as one company but they are distinct seperate enitities. But some idiots dont read or know this becouse they asume somthing that had a merger means that they are one company .
Is it just me or does the F126 look way more aggressive, scary and intimidating (visual wise) than the type 26? I don't know about anyone else but when comparing the two, I just get this feeling of aggressiveness projected from this design.
@@golemtv4817 Battleships ar not longer needed, destroyers or frigates are more flexibel in use. And by the way, neither Bismarck nor Tirpitz where superior.
@@matthiaseckert4022 eh, that's slightly debatable. With every new ship the Frigates and destroyers resemble the light and heavy cruisers of old. Infact if I'm not mistaken these modern ships I this video are actually larger then the super cruisers of the Deutschland class. And Bismarck and Tirpitz weren't superior, but they weren't bad ships either.
@@themanformerlyknownascomme777 "Infact if I'm not mistaken these modern ships I this video are actually larger then the super cruisers of the Deutschland class" Not quite. The Deutschland class was 10000 tons nominally, which is the planned displacement for the F-126, but they would only have this displacement if completely stripped of equipment - this was of course trickery to pay lip service to treaty restrictions. Their actual standard displacement was ~12000 tons for the first vessel, and even more for the next two. And of course their fully loaded displacement was even more.
I don't understand what the contractor is trying to prove with this content. Cybersecurity? Obviously it needs it because Chinese Gold Farmers and Nigerian Princes could cause havoc with a ship like this, but 1/2 the video was dedicated to the ship being "Cyber Protected". How about it's mission parameters, or sensors, expected weapon load? 10k ton displacement and 16 VLS, is this true? Do the crew each have en-suite with double bed? What is this thing? LOL?!
If this thing is 10,000 tons, isn't it too large to be called a frigate? This is a cruiser or at least a large destroyer. Why classify it with a "less" threatening word instead of calling it what it is?
German military has an image problem in Germany. Calling it frigate sounds less "agressive". The last destroyers were put out of service in 2003. Following ships were called frigates that are actually categorized as destroyers in specialized literatur. So it is basically a destroyer.
@@somehow86 That is a bit unfortunate. Even though the Japanese navy is called the Maritime Self Defence Force, they still have destroyers in their fleet. And I'm a bit surprised the contract went to a Dutch shipyard instead of a German one.
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arleigh-Burke-Klasse A bit less displacement, yet 96 VLS ... F126 a lot of money to ship 16 Cells around the word. The Module "Gewahrsam" (Prison Cell) is an ugly "joke" because the current German Government (Green Party) opulently denied supporting France, Italy and Spain in protecting the mediterran water border against human flesh trade by e.g. blockading the African cost line.
@@matzemaus2641 But you can t deploy them all the time like in swallow waters or because to avoid unnessary wear and tear of both equipment or personal! And they restrict your speed and manoverability at least while deploying them if nothing else! Unless they already suspect the presence of a sub those won t be ready in time , the sub is more likely to detect and shoot the frigate ! Your flexebility dosn t do you any good if your ship is sunk before lunching !
@@christianjunghanel6724 Hull mounted sonar and ship mounted torpedoes are becoming more and more obsolete as modern submarines get quiter. The effective ranges are extremely low, especially in shallow waters like the baltic. You will never get close enough and if you do by accident you are dead as well. Therefore some navies omit those systems now to save weight and money for other capabilities.
@@vuesch Hull mounted torpedos are crap (except the future seaspider anti topedosytem) i get that , what i meant is with subrocs were torpedos mounted on rockets! And for the hull mounted sonar , the reason i would still mount one is less finding subs rather than finding torpedos fired at you if the towed one is not available! If you can t use the towed array a regular one is better than nothing! Of course it is nowhere near as good but a towed one has disadvantiges as well like: It can t be deployed at all times/ it takes time to deploy/limits the movement of the user / when a ship is doing emergency manover while it is deployed it risks loseing the towed sonar becoming effektivlly blind! Ships who only have towed ones would have to suspect a sub beeing present in the first place to have a towed sonar or chopper deployed otherwise when they do not, all the sensors or countermeasures they have become irrelevant because they will only know that there is a sub when they blow up ! I m not making a case for ether sytem bcause i think you need both in combination !
@@christianjunghanel6724 The problem with lightweight torpedoes on rockets is: They are very heavy and have a range comparable to heavy weight torpedoes. If you can shoot the submarine, the submarine can probably shoot you as well. The most effective way to find a sumbarine is a towed aray for long range detection in combination with ASW helicopters with dipper or MPA with sonar buoys. Once the aircraft have them simply drop a lightweight torpedo on their head. This way you get a shorter reaction time and don't risk the ship.
And yet, the moment germany would announce the Aircraft-carrier "Konrad Adenauer", and german Boxer, Puma and Leopards would Blitz through Mali, and german Navy Ships would patrol around the world, everybody would scream bloody murder and call germany an expansionist and Imperialist and the chancellor in charge is the second coming of Hitler and Wilhelm II. The Rest of the world needs to make up their mind. Accept that germany focuses more on Europe but still is a military power that should not be taken likely, or realize that a Germany going overseas seeking influence around the world would be a lot more menacing and stop making jokes about that
I doubt that germany will give up their newest frigates so quickly. The Navy is happy that they are finally getting new ships. They wont really share, especially not with the phillipines (I served with the german navy, they really need new ships)
It always works. 100 years ago in the 20s everyone believed that Germany no longer had an army. There are things that are supposed to be seen and some that are not.
thats 2016 news, in 2021 this problem has been dealt with and the readiness rates of Bundeswehr equipment (fighters, helicopters, ships, subs, mbt etc) ar all on NATO average or above (for example the EF2000 has a higher readiness rate than the US F-22, and germany maintains more active modern MBT than the UK)
@Hans Sausage uh... the mainstream media migt e wrong a lot of the time, but they are right about our fleet struggling to maintain its functionality. there is a constant supply shortage in spare parts and equipment.
The best design frigate in the world....welldone
british one is better
@Kristoffer J yes
@Kristoffer J yes
@@redtob2119 I guess you are british..
@Kristoffer J I guess you are german...
The dutch and germans know how to build cool ships.
Its french company
Thales is French.
Really cool design! 😎
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arleigh_Burke-class_destroyer
The US Destroyer Class is a bit lighter (displacement) yet has 96 VLS Cells, the German F126 only 16 VLS Cells (plus 8 mid sized anti ship missiles with rather limited range) ... advertising the module "Gewahrsam" results in most likely the worlds most expensive seldomly used (we do not hunt the pirates really) prison cell. The full leadership of the German Military Purchasing Department was fired some weeks back yet sadly sent to early interment on full payment ...
A cruiser sized destroyer, but with only corvette firepower
Way under-armed for it's size...
For a country that prides itself in its own efficiency the german armed forces have the worst expense/capabilities ratio i have ever seen,they spend as much as France and the UK while having 1/5th of their capabilities. Truly astonishing
Its not the failure of the military. Its the dumb restrictions left wing politicians decide to create.
Sad reality, the cash is there but it is used unwisely and locked behind bureaucracy.
we are not priding ourselfs any more. After 1945 and realising what we have done to our neighbours, please forgive us, that we are a bit shy to spend money for guns.
@@hartmutwrith3134 What i mean is Germany spends a lot of money for essentially nothing.
No carriers,no ocean going surface fleet,no stealth aircrafts,no nuclear subs,no airlift capability,only a mere 200 tanks.
There's nothing that justifies the 50+ billions euros spent. I just wonder where are the money going.
@@ThisTheAviator Explain to me how an aircraft carrier should help Germany? Germany is working on an Fcas with France and Spain. To what extent does Germany need nuclear submarines? These are only good for the attack, in terms of being silent, they are not even close to the level of an A212. I agree with you that the procurement is bad, but you are wrong on many points. Also, things may get better with the newest government.
This design is cooler than Zumwalt
Considering that the Zumwalt class was a screwup that failed to deliver most of the capabilities it promised and was cancelled after only three mindboggingly expensive ships, that is a rather low bar to clear...
It looks great. But... according to the information provided in the video and the comments on here; if the loadout of these future ships are going to be tiny, then Germany is basically repeating the same actions that the interwar German government did with the Konigsberg and Leipzig-class light cruisers in the 1920s-1930s.
Granted, the old Weimar Republic was under the restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles and the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922. But as far as I'm aware, modern-day Germany isn't under any sort of arms or armament buildup restrictions... are they? If not, then what's the German government's excuse for not arming these 10,000-ton (to hell with it, I'm calling them 'light cruisers') ships to the teeth? And if they are, is that the reason why these ships are going to be lightly armed?
Oh well, maybe when Germany and the Netherlands get around to the "Future Air Defender" project (they're calling that one a 'Frigate' as well, but judging by the looks of the concept art, it looks like a beefed up version of the current F126, so I'm going to call it a 'medium cruiser'), it will have more weapons and a meaner punch compared to the F126.
Nice
Germany seems to have conceptualized more frigates right? In contrast to Japan which relies on destroyers. I wonder why ? Thank you
Germany just do not call them distroyers cause of its history. If you compare the length- here it is 166m- it is the size of a ship that other nations call distroyer
@@_Alfa.Bravo_ Thank you.
😊
Top
One best.
🇩🇪💪
There last destroyer they tried to make sea worthy sucked and they ditched it idk how I feel yet
???????????????????????? And what are you feeling little Goose from the city?
Germanys last destroyer was from the USA! All other Ship are frigates! All of them worked pretty good and german frigates are more powerful than some destroyers... BTW the F-126 isn't a destroyer! This is a new Shiptype never exist! It called MCV (Multi-purpose combat vessel) or in german MKS (Mehrzweckkampfschiff)!
Die Schiffe sind für ihre Größe die schwächsten Bewaffneten Schiffe was es gibt?!
little late innit, i mean itll be ready, only 1 of em, in 28'
Same for the last generation of new frigates. Couple that with five times the original price and you understand what most of the german public is already used to
Late for what exactly?
If only one of them is delivered over the span of 8 years, isn't that a bit too little, even for the military?
Only certain projects like stealth aircraft take that long, if not longer, to produce.
@@seargesoren9391 Man 90% of that time is developement. Building it will ofc not take 8 years. Maybe 1. And then there will be an additional one every year.
@@seargesoren9391 I think they'd build several of them simultaneously. You're right that it's going to be late, but the Bundeswehr has been starved of money for almost two decades, and only within the last five years or so has the defense budget ballooned, in good part due to a certain incident at Crimea demonstrating that Europe is unfortunately not quite as peaceful as people hoped it would remain after the 90s.
10,000 tons and only a 4000 mile range while only having 16 VLS cells? That's awful, are Germans not angry about this?
do you really think, any of the true specs are open for the public?
@@maraqu yes, all of those specs I listed are accurate.
yeah it's a joke. basically the size of a cruise ship and hardly any weapons. a classic tax payer ripoff.
To defend yourself that's enough 64 Essm missiles. In addition, this size was chosen because a lot of things are supposed to be automated there.
@@emhyrvaremreis4540 64 ESSM meaning no SM-2, SM-3, SM-6, cruise missile, ASROC or any future hypersonic missiles. so clearly 16 VLS is pathetic and useless especially for a ship the size of a fucking cruise ship. the russians build 2500t covettes with more VLS than this 10.000t frigate. it's a joke and an exercise in "we don't need weapons because there is no war"
Buen video
Too bad that the biggest threats are coming from within germany.
No , come from the big yellow dragon , eating Taiwan soon and other islands
great
now with everyone else begining to shamelessly copy the design of 055
it has proven itself to be the new dreadnought of our age
Keep in mind that german and dutch shipbuilders have a long history , The sachsen and zeven provincien class frigates ( well destroyers in reality) are of a same project slightly different but at the core the same. the Bremen class was based on the kortenaer class frigates , the current Kareldoorman JSS is shared with the germans. even before ww1 and ww2 both nations provided eachother with inovations and technologies . Most well know are the Battleship plans for the dutch in 1912-1913 , the java class cruisers. during ww1 and battle cruisers of 1939. In turn dutch IVS and INKAVOS provided the german navy with much information on building U-boats. And with firms like Hazemeyer ( later holland signaal , Thales netherlands) Siderious ,NSF , Philips etc tons of new tech and inovations where created .
Its a verry long and complicated history but well worth a read.
As a German i think that Germany does well looking to the Netherlands regards naval ships, while i think that the Netherlands does well looking to Germany regards to land forces. And the combined efforts today are leading us to a better future!
@@wudruffwildcard252 No truer words have been spoken .
Thales is a French company.
@@jeroenjanssen6870 Gues again , as holland signaal merged with thales , thales netherlands is still dutch with the majority of the stock in hand of the dutch goverment, Every radar system en sensor system created comes from thales netherlands dutch inovation dutch invention dutch empoyees . Its just like AIrfrance Klm they might look as one company but they are distinct seperate enitities.
But some idiots dont read or know this becouse they asume somthing that had a merger means that they are one company .
@@marcusfranconium3392 French.
Is it just me or does the F126 look way more aggressive, scary and intimidating (visual wise) than the type 26? I don't know about anyone else but when comparing the two, I just get this feeling of aggressiveness projected from this design.
agree
Lacking an LR Radar and LR Anti Ship Missles etc. its also important that it looks dangerous ...
When Germany rebuilds a modern Bismarck and Tirpitz
and England is rebuilding the Victory?????? Be smart!
Germany have learned from its mistakes
@@golemtv4817 Battleships ar not longer needed, destroyers or frigates are more flexibel in use. And by the way, neither Bismarck nor Tirpitz where superior.
@@matthiaseckert4022 eh, that's slightly debatable. With every new ship the Frigates and destroyers resemble the light and heavy cruisers of old. Infact if I'm not mistaken these modern ships I this video are actually larger then the super cruisers of the Deutschland class. And Bismarck and Tirpitz weren't superior, but they weren't bad ships either.
@@themanformerlyknownascomme777
"Infact if I'm not mistaken these modern ships I this video are actually larger then the super cruisers of the Deutschland class"
Not quite. The Deutschland class was 10000 tons nominally, which is the planned displacement for the F-126, but they would only have this displacement if completely stripped of equipment - this was of course trickery to pay lip service to treaty restrictions. Their actual standard displacement was ~12000 tons for the first vessel, and even more for the next two. And of course their fully loaded displacement was even more.
F125 not even combat ready by any means, and ya'll over here talking about the F126.
Sure thing, see ya'll in 2060
Deutsch🇩🇪
🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨💪👍👌
Go Netherlands
Netherlands? I mean shure go Netherlands, but this video is about a german frigat.
@@joachimhupe4018 Well, the ships will be built by Damen (which is a Dutch company), Thales (which is French) and Blohm+Voss.
@@profkluk yes
Netherlands will occupy Germany and grab those frigates.
@@BadRussian77 jepppp
I don't understand what the contractor is trying to prove with this content. Cybersecurity? Obviously it needs it because Chinese Gold Farmers and Nigerian Princes could cause havoc with a ship like this, but 1/2 the video was dedicated to the ship being "Cyber Protected". How about it's mission parameters, or sensors, expected weapon load?
10k ton displacement and 16 VLS, is this true? Do the crew each have en-suite with double bed? What is this thing? LOL?!
And still on this date Jan.20th,2024 Germany still has not hit%2 for military spending budget even after Russian invasion. Hurry up Berlin...
Like all other ffg designs, it is under-armed against the new threats. Too few missiles, it cannot defend against swarm-attacks
it has a type 055 lead in its design
Wow thr design looks futuristic
If this thing is 10,000 tons, isn't it too large to be called a frigate? This is a cruiser or at least a large destroyer. Why classify it with a "less" threatening word instead of calling it what it is?
German military has an image problem in Germany. Calling it frigate sounds less "agressive". The last destroyers were put out of service in 2003. Following ships were called frigates that are actually categorized as destroyers in specialized literatur. So it is basically a destroyer.
@@somehow86 That is a bit unfortunate. Even though the Japanese navy is called the Maritime Self Defence Force, they still have destroyers in their fleet. And I'm a bit surprised the contract went to a Dutch shipyard instead of a German one.
@@somehow86 that's not unique to the German military, at all. Virtually every major nation avoids the words "cruiser" like the plague.
@@oldbutbold it's not just Japan and Germany, but almost every other nation to.
@@themanformerlyknownascomme777 Well, not many countries build cruiser-sized warships.
The biggest Frigate-Class in the world with 10.000 tons. We are proud to get this strong and well equiped ships
weapons load out is really bad for a ship so big.
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arleigh-Burke-Klasse
A bit less displacement, yet 96 VLS ... F126 a lot of money to ship 16 Cells around the word. The Module "Gewahrsam" (Prison Cell) is an ugly "joke" because the current German Government (Green Party) opulently denied supporting France, Italy and Spain in protecting the mediterran water border against human flesh trade by e.g. blockading the African cost line.
that design looks cool
but.... what about nuclear ....thread, like now? emp?
Maid in iesrael enjoy
I hope Philippine Navy can buy of that new frigate
Hope so para may heavy frigate na tayo napakalaki kahit mga 8 units ok na yan
New Construction New constellation Class Destroyer's .
I was just watching the LEC and now I see you under such a video xD
Why don t they have hull mounted sonar or subroc?
Sonar drones and helicopter are flexibly, for more range and reaktion....
@@matzemaus2641 But you can t deploy them all the time like in swallow waters or because to avoid unnessary wear and tear of both equipment or personal! And they restrict your speed and manoverability at least while deploying them if nothing else! Unless they already suspect the presence of a sub those won t be ready in time , the sub is more likely to detect and shoot the frigate ! Your flexebility dosn t do you any good if your ship is sunk before lunching !
@@christianjunghanel6724 Hull mounted sonar and ship mounted torpedoes are becoming more and more obsolete as modern submarines get quiter. The effective ranges are extremely low, especially in shallow waters like the baltic. You will never get close enough and if you do by accident you are dead as well. Therefore some navies omit those systems now to save weight and money for other capabilities.
@@vuesch Hull mounted torpedos are crap (except the future seaspider anti topedosytem) i get that , what i meant is with subrocs were torpedos mounted on rockets! And for the hull mounted sonar , the reason i would still mount one is less finding subs rather than finding torpedos fired at you if the towed one is not available! If you can t use the towed array a regular one is better than nothing! Of course it is nowhere near as good but a towed one has disadvantiges as well like: It can t be deployed at all times/ it takes time to deploy/limits the movement of the user / when a ship is doing emergency manover while it is deployed it risks loseing the towed sonar becoming effektivlly blind! Ships who only have towed ones would have to suspect a sub beeing present in the first place to have a towed sonar or chopper deployed otherwise when they do not, all the sensors or countermeasures they have become irrelevant because they will only know that there is a sub when they blow up ! I m not making a case for ether sytem bcause i think you need both in combination !
@@christianjunghanel6724 The problem with lightweight torpedoes on rockets is: They are very heavy and have a range comparable to heavy weight torpedoes. If you can shoot the submarine, the submarine can probably shoot you as well. The most effective way to find a sumbarine is a towed aray for long range detection in combination with ASW helicopters with dipper or MPA with sonar buoys. Once the aircraft have them simply drop a lightweight torpedo on their head. This way you get a shorter reaction time and don't risk the ship.
March 2022. Paper frigates ?
Why?
@@emhyrvaremreis4540 10k tons with 16VLS, really?
@@redblueyankee8343 So?
@@emhyrvaremreis4540 It's so lightly equipped for the price of an Arleigh Burke, don't you notice the problem?
@@redblueyankee8343 Except that it wasn't designed for anti-aircraft purposes.
The largest and most expensive patrol boat ever built. The French fooling the Germans one more time XD
And yet, the moment germany would announce the Aircraft-carrier "Konrad Adenauer", and german Boxer, Puma and Leopards would Blitz through Mali, and german Navy Ships would patrol around the world, everybody would scream bloody murder and call germany an expansionist and Imperialist and the chancellor in charge is the second coming of Hitler and Wilhelm II. The Rest of the world needs to make up their mind. Accept that germany focuses more on Europe but still is a military power that should not be taken likely, or realize that a Germany going overseas seeking influence around the world would be a lot more menacing and stop making jokes about that
@@alexanderzippel8809 they don't even have enough energy to stay a civilised country and are facing a terrible winter this year. Germany is kaputt.😅
@@alsosprachzarathustra5505 So hows winter going? Pretty comfy eh?
Im really sorry to say it, but that comment is very dumb.
I hope Philippine Navy can buy of that new frigate
Huhuhu hope so para may heavy frigate na tayo kahit walang ganyan bilhin natin napakaganda at laki solid yan pang harang
I doubt that germany will give up their newest frigates so quickly. The Navy is happy that they are finally getting new ships. They wont really share, especially not with the phillipines (I served with the german navy, they really need new ships)
so, each modern warship is floating SuperComputer now
it has been since the past 3 decades, ever since the AN/SPY-1 Aegis System got introduced
Warships have always been packing the latest computers, virtually since computers became a thing.
@@themanformerlyknownascomme777 The Military in general is some years ahead of the civilian industry in everything somewhat useful for the military
the next generation frigate F127 will displace about 15000 tons and have only water cannons
lol Sponsored by Super Soaker? lol
HAHAHAHAHAA
3/4 of there ships are in port under repair. No subs active! What a damn shame
It always works. 100 years ago in the 20s everyone believed that Germany no longer had an army. There are things that are supposed to be seen and some that are not.
thats 2016 news, in 2021 this problem has been dealt with and the readiness rates of Bundeswehr equipment (fighters, helicopters, ships, subs, mbt etc) ar all on NATO average or above (for example the EF2000 has a higher readiness rate than the US F-22, and germany maintains more active modern MBT than the UK)
@Hans Sausage and germany provides the majority of AWACS flights etc
@Hans Sausage uh... the mainstream media migt e wrong a lot of the time, but they are right about our fleet struggling to maintain its functionality. there is a constant supply shortage in spare parts and equipment.
Dude, we have active submarines. What you get to know in the Media about our military....is not that accurate.