Those are extremely vague terms that don't actually describe the universe in any real way. Describing something and explaining it are two different things.
@@timelessperspective sure they do you just have to understand what is happening to the material used to make the light. the fact u have to break light into three parts should tell u something isnt right.
The material universe exists in the bewildered mind only. It's the world of chasing temporary objects, the world of deeply rooted ignorance, fear and mental adjustments.
Trust no man. Pray for Trump. I didnt want Bush or Obama to do Martial Law why would I trust Trump??? These are the end times people no man is doing what Trump is doing
Absolute complete bollox!!!! Try putting a proper scientific paper in and see what happens. You’ve dug up an old Victorian theory that was completely and utterly disproved in 1920. What’s the matter? no room on the Flat Earth boat?
First off, I’d like to say I think you are very intelligent and I love your videos. I am a union electrician who spent 5 years studying electrical theory with the IBEW JATC. I learned all the theories pushed by my teachers during my apprenticeship. I took to it very quickly and started asking questions that my teachers couldn’t answer. So I decided to pursue higher education and go for my electrical engineering degree. I didn’t finish because I felt that I understood electricity (and magnetism - which we both know are intertwined) better than my so called professors did. I feel like I have learned more from your videos than I did after 7 plus years of schooling. I realized very early that most things could be explained by ratios and proportions. The word that would explain electricity, for those who have no previous education on that topic, is equalization. Power never is created or destroyed but only changes state and what causes that change of state is the desire for the flux pressure to equalize. Very hard to explain in words, which I feel you do better than others, but a great explanation would be nature desires to be equal. If you put energy into the ether, nature wants that to equalize (yin and yang) that force. It doesn’t matter if it’s someone flapping their arms in a lake or if it’s a magnetic flux induced into a conductor only to equalize at a location at the other end of the conductor. I heard you say something about anti-gravity in another video. In my mind, as soon as I heard you say that, I thought to myself “there is no such thing as ‘anti-gravity’. That’s like saying unsweetened iced tea” and then you followed up with the statement that there really is no such thing as “anti-gravity” but it is possible to manipulate the electromagnetic field to make it appear to be an anti-gravity device. As soon as I heard you say that I knew that you really understood what you are talking about. Keep up the good work and I would love to bounce some of my own theories off you and your supporters.
Didn't make it as far in school as you guys did, but I encountered the same bologna when studying relativity, and black holes. They expect you to believe that nothing in the universe can move faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, but in order to fall into a black hole you have to cross the event horizon at or above the speed of light. Then the diameter of the black hole is both zero and infinite simultaneously. LOL. When AC and DC power came up and Tesla was never mentioned for two years of physics, and yet Edison and Einstein were mentioned on a daily basis really rubbed me raw. Later finding out about Steinmetz, and Heavyside really bothered me that this was skipped completely in introductory electrical engineering/physics.
Einstein in his 1920 lecture has stated that space without ether is unthinkable for then space would not possess any physical qualities when in reality it possesses numerous qualities. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect ether because it is present from above the KARMAN LINE i.e. outer space. To know about the various physical qualities of space and irrefutable presence of ether in outer space you must watch the video in my you tube link. ua-cam.com/video/kFSemmlKOb8/v-deo.html Please subscribe and share our channel so that more and more people become aware of the truth.
I feel so much in my life, even when people don’t make sense I just shut down & for some reason knew all their bs that they taught us never made sense in my mind. The energy even of people can be felt.
That's true, I believe in this, even if you're a hundred kilometers away you can feel them, I mean some things I have felt later make sense with the way they behave or the things they say or do.
This is insane! 8hrs of your fields and magnetism content have changed the way i see everything! Its beautiful! Of course light particles don't travel, they're in a gosh darn sealed enclosure! WHAT THE HELL HAS MAIN STREAM SCIENCE BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST CENTURY!
Keeping the secrets of the universe from us. Because we too can influence the ether with our minds and influence the universe like that magnet affecting that tv
What gets me is light travel at 300,000 kms in a vaccum(and air), but slows to 225,000 kms in water. If that is the case, and light is "particles" then the change in velocity from light leaving the water and going back into air must be infinite acceleration. So it never added up.
@Alset Alokin Do you eat paint chips? "Say what you mean" I think I did. By your other comments I wouldn't waste my time going into depth how little you actually know extending to your conspiracy theory. Unlike some I have an actual education and can understand physics. "So called science"...pffft...by someone who is using a device based on quantum theory.
@Omnipresent Spirit It's a fine line to walk and not get compromised. After all we have self preservation to worry about if a message is to be conveyed. Getting too pissed off and arrogant is what we did in our youth, but now that we've seen the opposition it would be naïve to think that having brains is not a liability. As your name implies the omnipresent spirit does our most compelling work. The truth does not come down from liars, only from the creator.
Based on a book I'm reading, Tesla asserts that the Æther is comprised of a dense sea of neutral, dialectric particles that act like an incompressible fluid. No where does he say that it's a field. Fields don't exist according to Tesla, but rather the rippling of the Æther undercurrent that permeates all of space and matter. If anything, he very adequately explains how Æther replaces the fields we use in convention.
But I didn't think they had to be mutually exclusive? Just that man's idea of a field IS the aether. Now I admit plugging in field properties and behaviors makes it easy to "prove" things, but I think that this aether is coherent and does exhibit different behaviors in aggregation depending on what we are witnessing.
But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: are you the sort of man who would put the poison into his own goblet or his enemy's? Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.
Why waste time poking fun at this guy and just simply listen to what he has to say without judgment. And as far as I can see humanity can use all of the knowledge It can possibly attain
Hi Ken, thank you for your common sense, and intuitive approach to physics (thank you also for the slick upgrade I received to my overall English vocabulary 😅) Please keep the physics videos coming, I think we desperately need guys like Eric Dollard and yourself. Thanks again man!
What you refer to as a field or ether becomes perceivable when you're high on DMT. You literally perceive a substance that makes up all that there is. And i mean including sound, light thought etc. Sound and other things (matter is also an tribute of that same field) work like a wave withing this field as they are emitted from their source. The actual field changes/reacts to a "wave". You see how it changes as various things interact with it. I experienced this when i was 17 and listening to your material shines a light on it. Its as if the field if stationary and a specific trigger allows it to change (dark to light, sound to silence, stillness to movement, density to absence of density).
I can see some of this stuff in the air when I don't drink or take drugs (prescription or otherwise (not that I take street drugs) and am meditating consistently. I can see static moving in the air and at night time in the dark see an outline of the room and butterflies/firefly creatures flying in the room, that dissappear when I try to use my physical eyes. I'm guessing this is less than 1% of the stuff that's all around us and like you say, the DMT shows a much larger percentage, perhaps everything?
Learning your terms has taken a while since I decided to learn them from exposure other than looking them up. This decision gave me a far better understanding than just bringing a book to the rescue. My decision was a correct one as I have expanded far beyond what I would have in any other way. Thanks!
This guy does really cool experiments that show really cool effects. That said, his understanding of electro chemistry makes him seem smarter than he really is. I'll not knock that he does cool stuff, but he obfuscates mechanisms for unreal stuff in the sense of doing experiments that have other versions showing same effects being painted as other things. Playing physics illusionist in a sense. Still love the experiments though!
Thank you for this presentation. It confirms Walter Russells explanation of movement, and his knowledge, however acquired, always gave a feeling of being correct. I was never clear as to how his Centrifugal and Centripetal motion occurred, but your Field Perturbation description makes perfect sense.
Im just wondering how you learned all of this truth? Did you take it upon yourself or did someone teach you? I feel like you wouldnt learn this type of stuff in college... they seem to teach the opposite and hide this stuff. I would really like to gain a better understanding of all of this, from the meanings of the terms to the uses. Im not going to lie, im not the smartest. I am very interested in learning tho.
I urge you to learn proper physics. I know it is tempting to choose the easy route by learning 'homemade' physics, but understanding mechanics, fields, and waves requires mathematics - words limit how much we can describe a given concept , which is why it can seem confusing when explained verbally.
Virtual photons ARE photons, they just are photons that are being acted on by certain forces for ease of explanation it's just an adjective and no they aren't used to balance equations they are listed as being virtual so the reader of the paper knows right away what is going on. Magnetism can indeed be quantized... it's measured by how much it affects the particles that happen upon it. the unit is the Tesla. Why does it effect the CTR far away ? Because virtual photons. A photon will continue traveling indefinitely if it doesn't get caught in the magnetic field but is instead basically thrown and that's where we use the term. They admitted the existence of the aether because they did not yet have a way to explain.... literally it was just meant to be a placeholder in science of something that they were seeing the effects of and just didn't know what to call it so they just said aether. The idea was LITERALLY just used in replacement of saying "we can see observe the affects of something going on here and we're not sure about the behavior of particles in someways because we can't measure them but we'll be able to" it was a placeholder similar to what you think virtual photons are. Light is indeed an emission, we can observe the effects of it's emission and the effects it has when hitting something. Fading colors, warmth of objects in the sun, and we can even measure the pressure created by all types of electromagnetic radiation as amounts of it strike a surface. Beyond just the lack of a correct and proper syntax in the explanation of what light is because it doesn't fit in our normal way of analyzing something and categorizing it as an object or a state of existence and is counterintuitive to the way we are used to thinking, this doesn't make anything about it wrong or not exist it's just a different way of thinking. Similar to classifying a virus as alive or not because we aren't used to thinking like that. But just because you don't understand magnetism doesn't mean it doesn't exist and to call people stupid who do have a grasp on it, ever have those revelations when you realize you missed a fundamental principle of something the whole time and it strikes you all at once, well this might happen to you if you'd think about the concept as being possible rather then just saying scientists are stupid because I myself do not grasp the concept so I'm just not going to study it any further which would be the rational thing to do. And yes there is a speed of light.... well depending on the substrate but 300000 km/s, it's quantifiable even within a single room and can be measured with a variance of less then meter which is pretty amazing. We also can measure it's speed going through mediums as slow as 17m/s, if light was a property of aether and it moves regardlessly since light can't be emitted in your eyes why does it slow down and especially through super fluids to such slow speeds. But yeah, when I don't understand a scientific concept I don't just throw books away and say it's alll a lie and storm out of work.
I don't agree with your concept of Ether/Aether. Within Alchemy, it is literally "the fabric/fluid of creation." It wasn't created a placeholder for something "we don't know." Light is essentially a wave in the Ether; as all things are, but within a certain frequency we have the experience of light. Within another range, sound; within another, solid matter. Why would a particle move at a different speed depending on the substrate? Doesn't that sound like a rate of induction; ala the movement of temperature or electricity? A PARTICLE moving through a substrate will encounter resistance depending on the substrate which will eventually decelerate the speed of the particle to zero. A PARTICLE has mass and doesn't magically change speeds when moving from one substrate to another. What "Force" acts on a photon when it emerges from a glass of water and suddenly "speeds up" in the air? If it was a particle, if it had any mass, it would require the water to "push" on it and accelerate it. It wouldn't just magically assume a certain speed depending on the substrate. It would require some constant propulsion, the force of which would magically vary depending on the substrate. The idea of light as a dielectric current makes sense; it behaves like one. It behaves like a rate of induction. If I place a candle underneath a cast iron pan with a wool blanket on top, the "heat" will move quickly through the iron, and then slowly through the blanket. It's not because there's a "temperatureon" particle moving through the iron quickly, and then suddenly losing speed through the blanket, emerging on the other side and suddenly speeding back up through the air. The rate at which the "heat" moves is not a quality of the temperature itself, but rather the substrate through which it is moving; its level of thermal conductivity or insulation. Similarly, the speed of "light" is a quality of the medium it is moving through, not of the light itself. It's really just the resistance of the substrate to a dielectric current, which we experience as light. The "Speed of Light" is the fastest propagation speed of which we are aware: the dielectric conductivity of the Ether; through 'Space'. It's a property of the Ether, not of light.
Gavlick, what are photons made of? What is an electron made of? What is the substance of the universe? The Aether is that substance. Photons are energy pulses in the aether. Mass is the aether in spin mode. We KNOW everything is made of one thing, because it can all be broken down to EM radiation.
+Cernnunos5 Yes and Alchemy is a disproven protoscience and within ACTUAL science the Aether WAS a placeholder until the Michelson-Morley experiment disproved it.
@@Theidmet David Lapoint demonstrates how light bends and appears to speed up when exiting glass or water in video 3 of his fabulous 3 part video series The Primer Fields. And it makes sense. Thoughts? Because nothing I believe is set in stone ..... Final thought to add.....as I continue to study and follow actual observations, comments, and papers from NASA, and scientists from other groups such as the Thunderbolts project, it does appear undeniable that there is some form of aether, be it space itself or the ionized particles and neutrinos, photons etc, the fact is that Birkland currents and filaments are observed and measured connecting bodies from planets, moons, stars, to streams of galaxies. Of the electrical processes I have no doubt, but understanding how the magnetic fields and currents are functioning exactly is still something intriguing and a curiosity.
I have a personal vow, As oft as I hear the analogy of the Elephant, I will come forth and ask this joke. In the hopes that it will become as popular someday. "What makes an elephant laugh? The idea of seven blind men feeling him up." It still amazes me that the elephant story is not as commonly known as it is widely heard.
I dont think its so much as ignorant as the truth is most likely suppressed to purpetuate other lies or agendas. These ideologies are pushed on the masses so much so and to the extent thats its extremely difficult to find the truth. If one goes against the grain one is labeled and unnaccepted, by design no doubt. Perhaps all the fluoride and pharmaceuticals in the water and food make us docile and easier swayed.
In agreement Mentis/mente in Latin means "mind" The hydrofluosilicic acid in American water does actually cause brain damage - frontal lobe damage. The Harvard School of Public Health, The Lancet Neurology, Dartmouth College, [as well as others] state that sodium fluoride and hydrofluosilicic acid are known neurotoxins
Do you know how pissing it is for a working scientist to hear they are part of an agenda to cover up truth? No you probably don't. The real truth is that there's so much to know and not enough people learning the knowledge because there's so much of it since the 50s. If you think Maxwell and Tesla solved everything then you're sorely mistaken and vain.
We always see frequency waves graphed in 2D on paper and they look like a sine wave just traveling up and down. Do you think it could be possible that the actual frequency wave is a spiral in 3 dimensions?
Or course. Take any 2d concept and turn it 3d. Then take 3d objects and stack or overlap each spatial vector and create 4d. So the sun and planets in 4d would be rings or tracks and not points. Look at long exposure pictures or time lapse etc. A lot of mandala patterns turn into beautiful architecture once stacked up in a 3d form. If that makes sense. Even the galaxy should be more like a 3d torus or mobius sphere than a disc... A black hole shows this gyroscopic ringing around it's outside. Basically black holes warp and pull in space in all equal directions creating field membranes that all warp and curve into the center. It's not a saucer with a bulge. 2d galaxies are like a symbol now. A logo and easier to understand and draw/visualize. Like an atom logo. A ball with tiny balls orbiting. Lol even the solar system moves in a spiral but we see the kindergarten version of a bullseye stationary. When light emits from a bulb it's like a balloon that spreads out but is feedback looping from pos to neg in the bulb. The arc creates a torus bubble like spiral that grows out light speed. When you turn off the light and arc source the bubble quickly shrinks and compacts back down into its source. My friends used to ask where the light goes when you turn it off. I don't think light moves like that. I think it's expanding and compressing like spherical torus balloons. Because light can move through itself the torus bubble hits the room walls and reflects back and fourth basically overlapping and layering as light intensity.
Nikola Tesla's quote on gravity and density of the ether: "What is the ether and why is it so difficult to detect it? I reflected on this matter for a seriously long time and here are the outcomes I have been led to: I think that all the contradictions about whether the ether exists or not are the result of wrong interpretation of ether's properties. The ether has always been presented as an aero - form environment (gaseous). That was the essential mistake. The ether has a very strong density. It is known that the more dense a substance, the higher is the speed of wave propagation within it. When comparing acoustic speed in the air and the light speed I have drawn a conclusion that ether density is several thousand times higher than air density. It is not the ether that is aero - form (gaseous) but the material world is an aero - form to the ether! A good example for such an interaction becomes apparent in gravitation, which should rather be named, universal compression. I think the material bodies do not gravitate between each other but it is the ether that makes one material body to press to another. We wrongly call this phenomenon gravitation. We can also feel ether's reaction when sudden acceleration or braking (inertia). The stars, planets and all the universe appeared from the ether when some part of it, due to certain reasons, became less dense. It can be compared with formation of blebs (air bubbles) in boiling water although such a comparison is only rough. The ether tries to return itself to its initial state by compressing our world, but intrinsic electric charge within the material world substance obstructs this. It is similar to that when the water compresses blebs (air bubbles) filled with hot water steam. Until the steam does get cold the water is unable to compress the bleb (air bubbles). With time, having lost the intrinsic electric charge, our world will be compressed with the ether and is going to turn into ether. Having come out of the ether once - so it will go back in to the ether." - Nikola Tesla.
"It is not the ether that is aero - form (gaseous) but the material world is an aero - form to the ether!" I liked that specially, very complex and game changing concept but put in a simple way.
@@Xeno_Bardock I did, and now I'm subscribed. On point elaboration of the idea, thanks for sharing. I'm learning so much from youtube videos and even more by reading comments. When people say the internet is full of trolls and bs they're only pointing out their lack of criteria... My internet bubble is a blessing for curiosity.
Look at all the butthurt indoctrinated "scientists" atomists that thumbs down this video lol, indoctrination sure is strong these days. The powers that be set up public schools to teach bogus crap so we would be less likely to discover their "noble" secrets and invent anything faster than them..... human selfishness is the core componet of our lack of progress.
When we are only taught about half of the universe we believe there are 2 seperate things. But there's just 2 ends of the same spectrum. Motion and stillness. It's that simple
Your Fault "Alexander Unziker" , a German physicist and an absolute denier of particle physics, quantum mechanics, General relativity etc. He talks about that in his book "Bankrupting physics ". He says the scientists made analytical mistakes. The mainstream slams him by saying he is not an expert in the field he analysed in his book.
Even as a kid, I always wondered: what kind of "matter - or material" were protons and electrons made of. I never had an explanation. If you go into this supposed matter, and you start to dissect, what do you find? In other words; what constitutes "actual matter'? Now I know: energy, vibration, and frequency. Thanks Ken.
All of this is fine. But the aim should be when exploring topics is PRACTICALITY. what problem can we solve with these concepts? What can we use these concepts to create? Dont get lost down the rabbit hole.
You said there is no way to define what a field is, but then you said light etc. is an aetheric field perturbation. What am I missing?? I have reason to believe that the aether exists, but I'm struggling with 'what' it is...
Just stumbled upon you. I don't know if you read these things, but I'd simply like to thank you for taking your time to enlighten the general public. I've just 'met' you and already I'm considerably richer for it.
Good morning my wonderful human being that is educating me on things that I kind of knew & even with the large vocabulary you have in describing all this finally makes sense of what I never believed from my teachers that taught us in school & university. They bored me all except those teachers that taught outside things that no one could ever explain. I never enjoyed school because even though I wasn’t tested smart, so,everything they taught just made me bored in both schools & university. I just love all that you teach us. Much love to you always & you are awesome off the charts of charts that all you teach me. Sorry just stating the truth!🥰
I wonder if the Planck distance would cause the Aether to be quantized in some fashion. Also, are you saying there are no electrons ? What about the quantized orbits of electrons in atoms ?
The Sagnac Experiment proves aether exists.. The problem with the Michelson Morley Experiment was their assumptions.. It was their assumption that the sun is moving through the aether that was the incorrect assumption..
Godrules first off experiments never provide proof, they show evidence, scientific experimentation and analyzing the results are conducted in a way to avoid people assuming too much and seeing a single thing done as proof. Especially when it's pseudoscience.
wrong. the sun is moving and Earth is flat and stationary. ...jeez what is this kindergarten? Polaris proves it also. everything above revolves around it like clockwork eternally
The ether has extreme power (or extreme possibilites) could be used for transporting great distances and other strategies. Just have to figure out how to utilize it for functional purposes.
I'm just saying ... Neither man put the other down - why do "comment geniuses" - make such statements "?" What charge is the benefit - from the desire to put others down in an effort to raise self up? The Public is addicted to "judging others" This behavior is concerning and highly associated with insecurity, lacking self-esteem/self-worth
Yes - aether has mass? Related to the observation that the universe seems to have much more mass than what is observed? Properties? Uniform throughout the universe? Must be impervious to forces, i.e. creating a (near) vacuum in a jar.
Roy Marable when a magnetic field is strong enough it acts on non ferrous materials.Also it can effect the iron in your blood. Basically it pulls on you 😕
I'm recently working on how to turn a faraday generator into a powerful generator. I have a few methods that will work. Lemme know if you wanna brains storm sometimes it's fun for me :)...
I took a steel antenna off of a car, and bent it into the shape of a lightening bolt, lol. Then put it back on the vehicle, and superglued a strong Nib disc magnet onto the very end of the antenna. Now when i pull back on the antenna and let go it rocks back and forth like a spring.....and it rocks back and forth very very fast. Then i took a powerful flashlight and aimed it at the antenna as it oscillated back and forth real fast in a blurr. Something appalling happened....let's just say that it Shined the Light on something in the Unseen Realm.
Take it from someone who has had a NDE( I now have a pacemaker) life doesn’t end at physical death. God is not a fairy tale, or a unicorn. This dimension is not the only dimension. The energy of life is also visible under certain conditions ( I have seen it) nothing scientific can be said to explain why my granddaughters who were in the same color bathing suits standing in the same sunlight would have to completely different color Auras ( fuzzy rainbows 🌈) around them as I was heart stopped yet still conscious as I was dying. If you had said Auras to me prior to that day I would have laughed at you, as I didn’t believe in that nonsense. Agnostic at best, atheist at worst I had mixed feelings about God. Seek , and continue to seek until something is given. This is what I did after seeing my granddaughters auras with no scientific explanation for the different colors. Seeking with the understanding that God , a after life, and a soul is real is the KEY to the Holy Spirit baptism of fire 🔥, bridal chamber, Agitation marvel, and repose I was born from. It doesn’t matter what you call it. Opening the third eye. Connecting to the spirit world, or connecting to God. Seeking with faith is the KEY to finding. When you are given you better have faith , because the first thing you see with your new eyes to see is your own personal cup of sin. It is very disturbing. The Agitation part of the Agitation, marvel, and repose spoken about in the book of Thomas . The marvel is the undeniable supernatural way it is delivered. Trust me when I say that we know not what we do. Arrogance, egos, hate, jealousy, bullying, weakness in the flesh, and denial of God is part of the pain of our cup. The very cup Jesus prayed about prior to his crucifixion . It’s important to note that he didn’t pray about the physical torture he was going to endure prior to the days end. He prayed about the more painful thing. He prayed about the cup. Not his cup mind you as he was Emanuel ( God with us). The perfect spotless lamb of self sacrifice. Showing us not only that he defeated death, but like a true father showing us he was not asking us to endure anything he himself ( completely innocent) wasn’t willing to endure. Showing us the way of our creator. You can expound all day on the physical nature of physics, and our material world. However until you open your eyes to the spiritual part of the world we live in you will remain in darkness. If you are of the light you will enlighten, for if you do not enlighten you are in darkness, and risk becoming darkness. That lightbulb may not emit what you call light. However it is all irrelevant if you do not understand that God is light.
The most valued thing... is when we accept that we do not understand anything. We are all but wise sages or great gurus, regardless of any rationale, human knowledge will always be incomplete. There is a thing in this community around Ken "guru" wheeler, and that thing is capable of generating great deals of conflicts between people... do you know why? Because everyone is so keen on being knowledgeable, on getting it, on understanding, but look inside, introspect your reasons, why do you want it? Is it not because of petty pride or egocentric reasons? All that I observe run after "mastery of knowledge" lazily, through pure intuition and force-inserting artistical and 'beauty-inspiring' ideas, when the problem isnt the ideas themselves nor the inspiration that they seem to give to those that "get it", the problem is the drive behind it all, to feed that pesky ego. We all *know nothing* Ken, and we wont ever know. All that we can do is an effort towards getting to know ourselves a little bit more. But right now, all that you're doing is the same ages-old behavior of "imposing power" that our animalistic drives wants us to commit. You're playing "I have the biggest schlong" but in another domain, and in another form.
JannikThomas :Couldn't agree more. This utterly arrogant clown is playing with words just to show off. His phrases, when analyzed, unveil a constant intention to be fantastic and controversial just to politically steer people into believing that Science is bad and that everybody else is an idiot. Just a big IQ going bazooka. What a lost for humanity. It could be so much more useful.
Jim Viau and still you keep working 9-5 in a system that you don’t even understand, believing what exactly? the mainstream knowledge and culture that is being served to you by the same system you don’t even understand?
Jim Viau + maybe this guy is really a clown, im not even watching the video right now, but if you want to impose your beliefs to someone so arrogantly, better explore everything. + Explain how we had no significant scientifical breakthroughs in the past how many years, and just for the notion, care to explain this too. The guy on who’s research 95% of technology we use today is based, had over 300 patents, including radio, ac , etc... believed in the aether(ether). His name was Nikola Tesla, just for you to know
What put you onto this topic? I checked out your older vids and this seems a bit random. Random in a great way though, I love it. Thanks for the information! Subbed!
Light is neither a wave or particle. Light is a coaxial circuit of longitudinal compressions & rarefractions, and transverse electrical and magnetic divergences.
@@montex66 "NASA" hasn't anything to understand; perhaps the employees might give it a go, but an administration doesn't fall into that category. And besides, I'd rather spend my time reading Feynman, Steinmetz, Kozyrev and Tesla.
Motion and repose... isn't mystical lol. Okay another question... Could it be that the LIM (Local Interstellar Medium) is the same as a toroidal medium?
Tbonyandsteak Start to actually get what the words he is using actually mean, then you might start getting it. Ken uses interesting sentence structure and words to get his idea across, but eventually it comes together and it’s like an awe moment.
@@m4iled I get it all right. The Fear of using the E word. Which is banned through all the so called Science community Cooouuuugh Cult.......... No wonder some call it a religion. I bet you if they were ever associate Eather with Science, Their career of ranks is over. In my country, it is an option that can choose to pay tax for the church or not. Same ting should be done on if you want your tax money go to that cults mad meaningless projects.
The feminine version of this guy'z presence in the universe currently is my stepmom believe it or not. Features, tattoos, behavior, views, intelligence are all the same or very similar. I mean different fields of intelligence but same levels. She is a teacher and cannot stand ignorance
Very informative! Do you have any ideas about gravity? Could it be pressure and not attraction? The heavy elements making voids and the "ether" trying to fill it?
If the aether exists then the michelson Morley proves earth does not move? That's what science is instead of saying the earth does not move they stated that the aether does not exist!
Mmx is flawed but even so it only proves that ether is not a static medium ie a completely currentless ocean, the density of it changes and varies based on a number of factors
About your "descriptions not being explanations" tangent, you're right to say that a description is not an explanation. However, it's easier to explain when you put it in perspective, by describing what's happening qualitatively so that you can delve into the quantitative aspects. Metal moving in a magnetic field creates electrical currents, and electrical currents have EM properties. Thus, the copper dropping is slowed because the copper creates its own set of fields that either repel or, as you'd explain, undergo deceleration due to countervoidance of the dielectric field vortices interacting. Also, your argument about there being no quantitative difference between a light bulb and a laser isn't quite true when you consider the net displacement of the light. While lasers are highly inefficient, they direct as much light as possible in almost one vector, whereas a light bulb disperses its light via nearly infinite vectors, radiating outwards from almost all spherical directions but the void created from the threaded base of the bulb. Thus, the net vector of the light from a laser is greater than the net vector of the light from a light bulb- it's energy density that sets the two light sources apart. Whether this "light" is a particle, wave, etherial pressure wave or otherwise, it's not too difficult to quantitatively explain why they behave differently once you put it in a qualitative perspective. :)
yea we basically don't really claim to know how to 'quantify' a magnetic field any more than we do a gravity field. but we can still use our rough quantification and measurements to yield calculable results. however the only way we can really quantify light at this time in a way that we can convert into units of energy is by using efficacy standards. and these efficacy standards are in no way absolute, and only based upon the highest efficiency we are insofar able to achieve. technically speaking, without the quantification he is referring to in this video, we can say today that 1 watt of power can potentially produce let's say 1 million lumens. most would agree this is not the case, but I don't think there is really a way to prove otherwise.
Magneticitist I think you kind of got what I was saying, but... what I meant was you can quantify how many lumens you get per given area, and how it changes over distance. Here's an example: 5w laser, 5w bulb. If we create an intersecting set of planes perpendicular to each other (x,y,z > 360 [degrees] x 360 x 360), the laser emits light from no measurable angle from the x-plane with the 360 degree measurement, but it does splay apart on the y- and z- planes, by 1/8-degrees. The bulb, however, releases light in 360 in the x-plane, and 270 in the y- and z- planes (base of the bulb obstructs the light). Same input energy, different area in which the output is dispersed.
this guy gets it, it's still not actually the right formula when it comes to light in but it's the reliable form of knowing the amount of lighting needed to achieve that result that is perfectly workable and not spend an hour calculating it lol. The dude just doesn't understand some principles so just rejects science in general but still I think he has a complex of wanting to appear scholarly to appeal to his sense of self worth which I could take some guesses at why but my doctorate wasn't in psychology and some theories about some behaviors I don't fully understand but it doesn't mean I should reject the theory
I think the funny thing is that you aren't really saying anything which contradicts his points. You're still talking about quality. "A lightbulb 'creates' decoherent light and a laser 'creates' coherent light." Yup. The quality of one is coherent, the quality of the other is incoherent, as you just explained.
Right, I am talking about a quality. However, I explained *how to quantify that quality*. The coherence and net emission of the light is the quantifiable factor in the quality described. True, the same amount of light is going out of either apparatus. The difference is in where it goes, which can be spatially quantified, hence the difference in net results. Theoria's explanation discards that spacial quantity, hence why it's wrong.
This makes sense of what Tesla said- "If you want to understand the universe, think in terms of energy, vibration and frequency".
Those are extremely vague terms that don't actually describe the universe in any real way. Describing something and explaining it are two different things.
@@timelessperspective sure they do you just have to understand what is happening to the material used to make the light. the fact u have to break light into three parts should tell u something isnt right.
The material universe exists in the bewildered mind only. It's the world of chasing temporary objects, the world of deeply rooted ignorance, fear and mental adjustments.
@@rajarsi6438 and for 2000 years too
In addition to that I believe Tesla said think of 3 6 9.
Tesla mixed with uncle Fester, brilliant!
Trust no man. Pray for Trump. I didnt want Bush or Obama to do Martial Law why would I trust Trump??? These are the end times people no man is doing what Trump is doing
LOL
DANIELlaroqustar ua-cam.com/video/amY1HBAdl1k/v-deo.html
Q WWG1WGA ua-cam.com/video/r0ZZzeURyK4/v-deo.html these arent pointless links, people dont waste their own time..
Absolute complete bollox!!!! Try putting a proper scientific paper in and see what happens. You’ve dug up an old Victorian theory that was completely and utterly disproved in 1920. What’s the matter? no room on the Flat Earth boat?
First off, I’d like to say I think you are very intelligent and I love your videos.
I am a union electrician who spent 5 years studying electrical theory with the IBEW JATC. I learned all the theories pushed by my teachers during my apprenticeship. I took to it very quickly and started asking questions that my teachers couldn’t answer. So I decided to pursue higher education and go for my electrical engineering degree. I didn’t finish because I felt that I understood electricity (and magnetism - which we both know are intertwined) better than my so called professors did. I feel like I have learned more from your videos than I did after 7 plus years of schooling. I realized very early that most things could be explained by ratios and proportions. The word that would explain electricity, for those who have no previous education on that topic, is equalization. Power never is created or destroyed but only changes state and what causes that change of state is the desire for the flux pressure to equalize. Very hard to explain in words, which I feel you do better than others, but a great explanation would be nature desires to be equal. If you put energy into the ether, nature wants that to equalize (yin and yang) that force. It doesn’t matter if it’s someone flapping their arms in a lake or if it’s a magnetic flux induced into a conductor only to equalize at a location at the other end of the conductor.
I heard you say something about anti-gravity in another video. In my mind, as soon as I heard you say that, I thought to myself “there is no such thing as ‘anti-gravity’. That’s like saying unsweetened iced tea” and then you followed up with the statement that there really is no such thing as “anti-gravity” but it is possible to manipulate the electromagnetic field to make it appear to be an anti-gravity device. As soon as I heard you say that I knew that you really understood what you are talking about.
Keep up the good work and I would love to bounce some of my own theories off you and your supporters.
Thanks for your valuable comment, regarding electricity as to equalization.
Didn't make it as far in school as you guys did, but I encountered the same bologna when studying relativity, and black holes. They expect you to believe that nothing in the universe can move faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, but in order to fall into a black hole you have to cross the event horizon at or above the speed of light. Then the diameter of the black hole is both zero and infinite simultaneously. LOL. When AC and DC power came up and Tesla was never mentioned for two years of physics, and yet Edison and Einstein were mentioned on a daily basis really rubbed me raw. Later finding out about Steinmetz, and Heavyside really bothered me that this was skipped completely in introductory electrical engineering/physics.
Bitchin', Gag me with a Spoon.
Einstein in his 1920 lecture has stated that space without ether is unthinkable for then space would not possess any physical qualities when in reality it possesses numerous qualities. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect ether because it is present from above the KARMAN LINE i.e. outer space. To know about the various physical qualities of space and irrefutable presence of ether in outer space you must watch the video in my you tube link. ua-cam.com/video/kFSemmlKOb8/v-deo.html Please subscribe and share our channel so that more and more people become aware of the truth.
This is your neighbor. Can you please stop messing with your magnet! It's incredibly hard to watch tv right now.
LOL!
Oooh no wonder the lady next door to me keeps me up all night yelling about something :0)
Scareface79 😂🤣
No
LOL!
I feel so much in my life, even when people don’t make sense I just shut down & for some reason knew all their bs that they taught us never made sense in my mind. The energy even of people can be felt.
That's true, I believe in this, even if you're a hundred kilometers away you can feel them, I mean some things I have felt later make sense with the way they behave or the things they say or do.
This is insane! 8hrs of your fields and magnetism content have changed the way i see everything! Its beautiful! Of course light particles don't travel, they're in a gosh darn sealed enclosure! WHAT THE HELL HAS MAIN STREAM SCIENCE BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST CENTURY!
Rob Wigglezz science has been deceiving to avoid the inevitable. “They” destroyed Tesla for trying to fix things.
Taking your money and selling you primitive screens to distract you and tracking devices for your every movement and word.
Keeping the secrets of the universe from us. Because we too can influence the ether with our minds and influence the universe like that magnet affecting that tv
What gets me is light travel at 300,000 kms in a vaccum(and air), but slows to 225,000 kms in water. If that is the case, and light is "particles" then the change in velocity from light leaving the water and going back into air must be infinite acceleration. So it never added up.
@@rinzler9775 hmm good point 🤔
Oh wow a real intellect how rare...and funny too....thank you :)
he is far from that
Thyalwaysseek : yes, he may be smart indeed, but they do not make them as arrogant anymore. It's beyond annoying.
@Alset Alokin
Do you eat paint chips? "Say what you mean" I think I did. By your other comments I wouldn't waste my time going into depth how little you actually know extending to your conspiracy theory. Unlike some I have an actual education and can understand physics. "So called science"...pffft...by someone who is using a device based on quantum theory.
@@buttersstotch4555 Butt hole
@Omnipresent Spirit It's a fine line to walk and not get compromised. After all we have self preservation to worry about if a message is to be conveyed. Getting too pissed off and arrogant is what we did in our youth, but now that we've seen the opposition it would be naïve to think that having brains is not a liability.
As your name implies the omnipresent spirit does our most compelling work. The truth does not come down from liars, only from the creator.
Based on a book I'm reading, Tesla asserts that the Æther is comprised of a dense sea of neutral, dialectric particles that act like an incompressible fluid. No where does he say that it's a field. Fields don't exist according to Tesla, but rather the rippling of the Æther undercurrent that permeates all of space and matter. If anything, he very adequately explains how Æther replaces the fields we use in convention.
Interesting! What book is it?
But I didn't think they had to be mutually exclusive? Just that man's idea of a field IS the aether. Now I admit plugging in field properties and behaviors makes it easy to "prove" things, but I think that this aether is coherent and does exhibit different behaviors in aggregation depending on what we are witnessing.
"You cannot quantify something which has no quantity" 👏👏
I keep waiting for him to say "inconceivable"
Oh snap!!! You are so right!!!! 😂
But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: are you the sort of man who would put the poison into his own goblet or his enemy's? Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.
Why waste time poking fun at this guy and just simply listen to what he has to say without judgment. And as far as I can see humanity can use all of the knowledge It can possibly attain
MyFirstLoveMusicXOXO I see your point - and I think it is valid. However, the knowledge is NOT conveyed in the same humble manor
Kyuss 89 Nice princess bride movie reference!
I remember watching this 4 years ago, great to revisit with a more mature and verbose understanding of the world.
Hi Ken, thank you for your common sense, and intuitive approach to physics (thank you also for the slick upgrade I received to my overall English vocabulary 😅) Please keep the physics videos coming, I think we desperately need guys like Eric Dollard and yourself. Thanks again man!
What you refer to as a field or ether becomes perceivable when you're high on DMT. You literally perceive a substance that makes up all that there is. And i mean including sound, light thought etc. Sound and other things (matter is also an tribute of that same field) work like a wave withing this field as they are emitted from their source. The actual field changes/reacts to a "wave". You see how it changes as various things interact with it. I experienced this when i was 17 and listening to your material shines a light on it. Its as if the field if stationary and a specific trigger allows it to change (dark to light, sound to silence, stillness to movement, density to absence of density).
I can see some of this stuff in the air when I don't drink or take drugs (prescription or otherwise (not that I take street drugs) and am meditating consistently. I can see static moving in the air and at night time in the dark see an outline of the room and butterflies/firefly creatures flying in the room, that dissappear when I try to use my physical eyes. I'm guessing this is less than 1% of the stuff that's all around us and like you say, the DMT shows a much larger percentage, perhaps everything?
i keep trying to describe that noise and no one else i talk to gets it / you may be the only one @@troy8613
I thank the universe for being directed to people like you, who really know what they are talking about, thank you.
Einstein ONLY job was to erase the aether!
😂😂😂
This cracked me up.
I am devoting myself to restoring it.
Of course either exists. I have a couple gallons of it in the garage. 🤣
I have to say., I enjoyed listening to your video, I like your style and what you say.
Reall. How about "how it is delucered"?
Sorta - Negative attitude
Great lesson. Thanks! And may our Creator keep bless your intellect.
"you can have ape arms maybe a little longer" lmaooo idk how you manage to squeeze in these lil funny bits in such serious talks
Mathematician here. Been frustrated with the physics community for most of my life. Your video is appreciated.
Dork.
This now makes me angry at the years of lies and billions spent on false doctrines. I would love to see what Tesla would say now.
I use ether to start my lawnmower.
Dennis Wuest I used the ether to mount a tire.
Tracker Buckmann. you used matter which you had to move through ether.
This guy's so Dunning-Kruger he can't even SPELL aether correctly.
Ken Wheeler sniffed a lot of ether when he got those tats.
lol
Learning your terms has taken a while since I decided to learn them from exposure other than looking them up. This decision gave me a far better understanding than just bringing a book to the rescue. My decision was a correct one as I have expanded far beyond what I would have in any other way. Thanks!
This guy does really cool experiments that show really cool effects. That said, his understanding of electro chemistry makes him seem smarter than he really is. I'll not knock that he does cool stuff, but he obfuscates mechanisms for unreal stuff in the sense of doing experiments that have other versions showing same effects being painted as other things. Playing physics illusionist in a sense.
Still love the experiments though!
I'm determined to watch these videos until I understand. I gotta set aside some time and read Theoria's book too. Absolutely mesmerizing.
Thank you for this presentation. It confirms Walter Russells explanation of movement, and his knowledge, however acquired, always gave a feeling of being correct. I was never clear as to how his Centrifugal and Centripetal motion occurred, but your Field Perturbation description makes perfect sense.
Im just wondering how you learned all of this truth? Did you take it upon yourself or did someone teach you? I feel like you wouldnt learn this type of stuff in college... they seem to teach the opposite and hide this stuff. I would really like to gain a better understanding of all of this, from the meanings of the terms to the uses. Im not going to lie, im not the smartest. I am very interested in learning tho.
I urge you to learn proper physics. I know it is tempting to choose the easy route by learning 'homemade' physics, but understanding mechanics, fields, and waves requires mathematics - words limit how much we can describe a given concept , which is why it can seem confusing when explained verbally.
Instead of trusting someone else's opinion, why not learn both sides first, then form your own opinion.
the aether brought me here.
Æther*
You sir.
how do you even write that haha, not seeing it on my keyboard :P
Virtual photons ARE photons, they just are photons that are being acted on by certain forces for ease of explanation it's just an adjective and no they aren't used to balance equations they are listed as being virtual so the reader of the paper knows right away what is going on. Magnetism can indeed be quantized... it's measured by how much it affects the particles that happen upon it. the unit is the Tesla. Why does it effect the CTR far away ? Because virtual photons. A photon will continue traveling indefinitely if it doesn't get caught in the magnetic field but is instead basically thrown and that's where we use the term. They admitted the existence of the aether because they did not yet have a way to explain.... literally it was just meant to be a placeholder in science of something that they were seeing the effects of and just didn't know what to call it so they just said aether. The idea was LITERALLY just used in replacement of saying "we can see observe the affects of something going on here and we're not sure about the behavior of particles in someways because we can't measure them but we'll be able to" it was a placeholder similar to what you think virtual photons are. Light is indeed an emission, we can observe the effects of it's emission and the effects it has when hitting something. Fading colors, warmth of objects in the sun, and we can even measure the pressure created by all types of electromagnetic radiation as amounts of it strike a surface. Beyond just the lack of a correct and proper syntax in the explanation of what light is because it doesn't fit in our normal way of analyzing something and categorizing it as an object or a state of existence and is counterintuitive to the way we are used to thinking, this doesn't make anything about it wrong or not exist it's just a different way of thinking. Similar to classifying a virus as alive or not because we aren't used to thinking like that. But just because you don't understand magnetism doesn't mean it doesn't exist and to call people stupid who do have a grasp on it, ever have those revelations when you realize you missed a fundamental principle of something the whole time and it strikes you all at once, well this might happen to you if you'd think about the concept as being possible rather then just saying scientists are stupid because I myself do not grasp the concept so I'm just not going to study it any further which would be the rational thing to do. And yes there is a speed of light.... well depending on the substrate but 300000 km/s, it's quantifiable even within a single room and can be measured with a variance of less then meter which is pretty amazing. We also can measure it's speed going through mediums as slow as 17m/s, if light was a property of aether and it moves regardlessly since light can't be emitted in your eyes why does it slow down and especially through super fluids to such slow speeds. But yeah, when I don't understand a scientific concept I don't just throw books away and say it's alll a lie and storm out of work.
I don't agree with your concept of Ether/Aether.
Within Alchemy, it is literally "the fabric/fluid of creation." It wasn't created a placeholder for something "we don't know."
Light is essentially a wave in the Ether; as all things are, but within a certain frequency we have the experience of light. Within another range, sound; within another, solid matter.
Why would a particle move at a different speed depending on the substrate? Doesn't that sound like a rate of induction; ala the movement of temperature or electricity? A PARTICLE moving through a substrate will encounter resistance depending on the substrate which will eventually decelerate the speed of the particle to zero. A PARTICLE has mass and doesn't magically change speeds when moving from one substrate to another. What "Force" acts on a photon when it emerges from a glass of water and suddenly "speeds up" in the air? If it was a particle, if it had any mass, it would require the water to "push" on it and accelerate it. It wouldn't just magically assume a certain speed depending on the substrate. It would require some constant propulsion, the force of which would magically vary depending on the substrate.
The idea of light as a dielectric current makes sense; it behaves like one. It behaves like a rate of induction.
If I place a candle underneath a cast iron pan with a wool blanket on top, the "heat" will move quickly through the iron, and then slowly through the blanket. It's not because there's a "temperatureon" particle moving through the iron quickly, and then suddenly losing speed through the blanket, emerging on the other side and suddenly speeding back up through the air. The rate at which the "heat" moves is not a quality of the temperature itself, but rather the substrate through which it is moving; its level of thermal conductivity or insulation.
Similarly, the speed of "light" is a quality of the medium it is moving through, not of the light itself. It's really just the resistance of the substrate to a dielectric current, which we experience as light. The "Speed of Light" is the fastest propagation speed of which we are aware: the dielectric conductivity of the Ether; through 'Space'. It's a property of the Ether, not of light.
Gavlick, what are photons made of? What is an electron made of? What is the substance of the universe?
The Aether is that substance. Photons are energy pulses in the aether. Mass is the aether in spin mode. We KNOW everything is made of one thing, because it can all be broken down to EM radiation.
+Cernnunos5 Yes and Alchemy is a disproven protoscience and within ACTUAL science the Aether WAS a placeholder until the Michelson-Morley experiment disproved it.
@@Theidmet David Lapoint demonstrates how light bends and appears to speed up when exiting glass or water in video 3 of his fabulous 3 part video series The Primer Fields. And it makes sense. Thoughts? Because nothing I believe is set in stone
.....
Final thought to add.....as I continue to study and follow actual observations, comments, and papers from NASA, and scientists from other groups such as the Thunderbolts project, it does appear undeniable that there is some form of aether, be it space itself or the ionized particles and neutrinos, photons etc, the fact is that Birkland currents and filaments are observed and measured connecting bodies from planets, moons, stars, to streams of galaxies. Of the electrical processes I have no doubt, but understanding how the magnetic fields and currents are functioning exactly is still something intriguing and a curiosity.
Brian Cramer B-friken-S. You have been duped in Copenhagen and you may live to see the end of your precious “theories”.
"the sun does not emit light"
what.
So the ether is the rainbow in the sky that we don’t always see but it’s always there. That’s what they’re tapping into with fiber optics.
I have a personal vow, As oft as I hear the analogy of the Elephant, I will come forth and ask this joke. In the hopes that it will become as popular someday. "What makes an elephant laugh? The idea of seven blind men feeling him up." It still amazes me that the elephant story is not as commonly known as it is widely heard.
I dont think its so much as ignorant as the truth is most likely suppressed to purpetuate other lies or agendas. These ideologies are pushed on the masses so much so and to the extent thats its extremely difficult to find the truth. If one goes against the grain one is labeled and unnaccepted, by design no doubt. Perhaps all the fluoride and pharmaceuticals in the water and food make us docile and easier swayed.
In agreement
Mentis/mente in Latin means "mind"
The hydrofluosilicic acid in American water does actually cause brain damage - frontal lobe damage.
The Harvard School of Public Health, The Lancet Neurology, Dartmouth College, [as well as others] state that sodium fluoride and hydrofluosilicic acid are known neurotoxins
Do you know how pissing it is for a working scientist to hear they are part of an agenda to cover up truth? No you probably don't. The real truth is that there's so much to know and not enough people learning the knowledge because there's so much of it since the 50s. If you think Maxwell and Tesla solved everything then you're sorely mistaken and vain.
@@i-evi-l useful idiot, not part of the agenda
We always see frequency waves graphed in 2D on paper and they look like a sine wave just traveling up and down. Do you think it could be possible that the actual frequency wave is a spiral in 3 dimensions?
Yes
Or course. Take any 2d concept and turn it 3d. Then take 3d objects and stack or overlap each spatial vector and create 4d. So the sun and planets in 4d would be rings or tracks and not points. Look at long exposure pictures or time lapse etc. A lot of mandala patterns turn into beautiful architecture once stacked up in a 3d form. If that makes sense. Even the galaxy should be more like a 3d torus or mobius sphere than a disc... A black hole shows this gyroscopic ringing around it's outside. Basically black holes warp and pull in space in all equal directions creating field membranes that all warp and curve into the center.
It's not a saucer with a bulge. 2d galaxies are like a symbol now. A logo and easier to understand and draw/visualize. Like an atom logo. A ball with tiny balls orbiting. Lol even the solar system moves in a spiral but we see the kindergarten version of a bullseye stationary. When light emits from a bulb it's like a balloon that spreads out but is feedback looping from pos to neg in the bulb. The arc creates a torus bubble like spiral that grows out light speed. When you turn off the light and arc source the bubble quickly shrinks and compacts back down into its source.
My friends used to ask where the light goes when you turn it off. I don't think light moves like that. I think it's expanding and compressing like spherical torus balloons. Because light can move through itself the torus bubble hits the room walls and reflects back and fourth basically overlapping and layering as light intensity.
What would explain an elephant is that it is both a snake hippo manta ray duality.
Wow. Truth. Hurry up UA-cam, demonetize and ban this guy.
Thank you. Great content 👍
Nikola Tesla's quote on gravity and density of the ether:
"What is the ether and why is it so difficult to detect it? I reflected on this matter for a seriously long time and here are the outcomes I have been led to: I think that all the contradictions about whether the ether exists or not are the result of wrong interpretation of ether's properties. The ether has always been presented as an aero - form environment (gaseous). That was the essential mistake. The ether has a very strong density. It is known that the more dense a substance, the higher is the speed of wave propagation within it. When comparing acoustic speed in the air and the light speed I have drawn a conclusion that ether density is several thousand times higher than air density. It is not the ether that is aero - form (gaseous) but the material world is an aero - form to the ether!
A good example for such an interaction becomes apparent in gravitation, which should rather be named, universal compression. I think the material bodies do not gravitate between each other but it is the ether that makes one material body to press to another. We wrongly call this phenomenon gravitation. We can also feel ether's reaction when sudden acceleration or braking (inertia). The stars, planets and all the universe appeared from the ether when some part of it, due to certain reasons, became less dense.
It can be compared with formation of blebs (air bubbles) in boiling water although such a comparison is only rough. The ether tries to return itself to its initial state by compressing our world, but intrinsic electric charge within the material world substance obstructs this. It is similar to that when the water compresses blebs (air bubbles) filled with hot water steam. Until the steam does get cold the water is unable to compress the bleb (air bubbles). With time, having lost the intrinsic electric charge, our world will be compressed with the ether and is going to turn into ether. Having come out of the ether once - so it will go back in to the ether." - Nikola Tesla.
"It is not the ether that is aero - form (gaseous) but the material world is an aero - form to the ether!"
I liked that specially, very complex and game changing concept but put in a simple way.
@@Yarblocosifilitico Check two part video "Ghosts in the Ether" by electrical engineer Robert Distinti on density of the ether.
@@Xeno_Bardock I did, and now I'm subscribed. On point elaboration of the idea, thanks for sharing. I'm learning so much from youtube videos and even more by reading comments. When people say the internet is full of trolls and bs they're only pointing out their lack of criteria... My internet bubble is a blessing for curiosity.
Could you put out a vocabulary list? Feel like I outta be taking notes. lol
Robert Roberts and index and a table of contents too
Robert Roberts Trust me, he has no idea what most of those words mean either.
Anthony Wildman He's using the words correctly though.
Look at all the butthurt indoctrinated "scientists" atomists that thumbs down this video lol, indoctrination sure is strong these days. The powers that be set up public schools to teach bogus crap so we would be less likely to discover their "noble" secrets and invent anything faster than them..... human selfishness is the core componet of our lack of progress.
He has a free pdf 4th edition book on magnetism online you can download for free
When we are only taught about half of the universe we believe there are 2 seperate things. But there's just 2 ends of the same spectrum. Motion and stillness. It's that simple
I have discovered the source of unicorn farts.... It's a bi-product from the atomist bean counters trying to make soup.
11:30 so that's what is happening when scientists said they measured gravitational waves from two merging black holes in space (Ether pressure waves)
Or, they are just trying to justify the price tag of their detection device, which was paid for by someone else.
Your Fault "Alexander Unziker" , a German physicist and an absolute denier of particle physics, quantum mechanics, General relativity etc. He talks about that in his book "Bankrupting physics ". He says the scientists made analytical mistakes. The mainstream slams him by saying he is not an expert in the field he analysed in his book.
I love this guy!
Even as a kid, I always wondered: what kind of "matter - or material" were protons and electrons made of. I never had an explanation. If you go into this supposed matter, and you start to dissect, what do you find? In other words; what constitutes "actual matter'? Now I know: energy, vibration, and frequency. Thanks Ken.
Are there any Ken Wheeler talks Walter Russell (ex: Universal One) videos?
Sangac exp. proved the ether right? I just dig you so dang much. The world needs more of your knowledge.
Willowtable You can say that again
No such thing as aether. Never was, never will exist.
All of this is fine. But the aim should be when exploring topics is PRACTICALITY. what problem can we solve with these concepts? What can we use these concepts to create? Dont get lost down the rabbit hole.
You said there is no way to define what a field is, but then you said light etc. is an aetheric field perturbation. What am I missing?? I have reason to believe that the aether exists, but I'm struggling with 'what' it is...
Just stumbled upon you. I don't know if you read these things, but I'd simply like to thank you for taking your time to enlighten the general public. I've just 'met' you and already I'm considerably richer for it.
Love when he states at the end, "It is very simple".
You make my head hurt in a good way
Good morning my wonderful human being that is educating me on things that I kind of knew & even with the large vocabulary you have in describing all this finally makes sense of what I never believed from my teachers that taught us in school & university. They bored me all except those teachers that taught outside things that no one could ever explain. I never enjoyed school because even though I wasn’t tested smart, so,everything they taught just made me bored in both schools & university. I just love all that you teach us. Much love to you always & you are awesome off the charts of charts that all you teach me. Sorry just stating the truth!🥰
Is the only Man to give the reality about how works the Nature! RESPECT
So, what's your explanation of the double-slit experiment? What's going on there?
Charges and/or light is interacting with the magnetic fields of the particles that comprise the material in which the slits are cut.
They don’t have one he is a guy using kind of scientific words
he has a newer video posted that tells you discussing ether
he has a newer video posted that tells you discussing ether
Sean Morgan saying light is a “coaxial” circuit is laughable he’s playing people for chumps with a moderately ok vocabulary
Theoria Apophasis
Thank you Sir.
I consider you a very bright light in the darkness of the apparent paradigm.
I learn [ a lot ] from your discussions!
Of course the aether exists, it just has no mass, and no charge, and does not interact with anything around it.
18:04 "that's the ether, baby!" Lol
Lol, got me too
I've never studied physics (was in biology/chemistry stream in high school) and yet I intuitively was able to semi-understand what you explained.
I wonder if the Planck distance would cause the Aether to be quantized in some fashion. Also, are you saying there are no electrons ? What about the quantized orbits of electrons in atoms ?
Love your videos! Speaking of a light bulb. Tell me how a bulb blows without the lamp being plugged into an electrical outlet.
I can't believe how much stuff I'm learning from you everything is starting to makes sense
The Sagnac Experiment proves aether exists.. The problem with the Michelson Morley Experiment was their assumptions.. It was their assumption that the sun is moving through the aether that was the incorrect assumption..
Godrules first off experiments never provide proof, they show evidence, scientific experimentation and analyzing the results are conducted in a way to avoid people assuming too much and seeing a single thing done as proof. Especially when it's pseudoscience.
Lawrence Green the earths not flat dumbass...it's concave spherical.
Gavlick Apthesycerski
"pseudoscience"? Like mainstream cosmology? Like mainstream meteorology? etc?
The assumption was the ether was a wave. Which it isn’t.
wrong. the sun is moving and Earth is flat and stationary. ...jeez what is this kindergarten? Polaris proves it also. everything above revolves around it like clockwork eternally
John Lovitz does science.
The ether has extreme power (or extreme possibilites) could be used for transporting great distances and other strategies. Just have to figure out how to utilize it for functional purposes.
Want to know MORE about aether.
Sagnac was right. Which makes Einstein a master b.s. artist. Anyway to communicate directly?
I'm just saying ...
Neither man put the other down - why do "comment geniuses" - make such statements "?"
What charge is the benefit - from the desire to put others down in an effort to raise self up?
The Public is addicted to "judging others"
This behavior is concerning and highly associated with insecurity, lacking self-esteem/self-worth
Yes - aether has mass? Related to the observation that the universe seems to have much more mass than what is observed? Properties? Uniform throughout the universe? Must be impervious to forces, i.e. creating a (near) vacuum in a jar.
E=mc FRAUD
Why is the magnet dangerous?What does it do to a person?
Roy Marable when a magnetic field is strong enough it acts on non ferrous materials.Also it can effect the iron in your blood. Basically it pulls on you 😕
Thank you for taking the time to explain this for me. 👍
Roy Marable check out "world's strongest magnet" it's neet. It demonstrates magnets acting on non ferrous materials.
I'm recently working on how to turn a faraday generator into a powerful generator. I have a few methods that will work. Lemme know if you wanna brains storm sometimes it's fun for me :)...
I took a steel antenna off of a car, and bent it into the shape of a lightening bolt, lol. Then put it back on the vehicle, and superglued a strong Nib disc magnet onto the very end of the antenna. Now when i pull back on the antenna and let go it rocks back and forth like a spring.....and it rocks back and forth very very fast. Then i took a powerful flashlight and aimed it at the antenna as it oscillated back and forth real fast in a blurr. Something appalling happened....let's just say that it Shined the Light on something in the Unseen Realm.
So., does e=mc2 apply here? because if it does in the video example, the ether/magnetism force is a type of matter or radioactivity
I like the way you word things young man
:0)
I keep my aether in a big brown bag. In Xanadu.
It’s like a fish swimming in water claiming there’s no such thing as water... best quote ever!
Take it from someone who has had a NDE( I now have a pacemaker) life doesn’t end at physical death. God is not a fairy tale, or a unicorn. This dimension is not the only dimension. The energy of life is also visible under certain conditions ( I have seen it) nothing scientific can be said to explain why my granddaughters who were in the same color bathing suits standing in the same sunlight would have to completely different color Auras ( fuzzy rainbows 🌈) around them as I was heart stopped yet still conscious as I was dying. If you had said Auras to me prior to that day I would have laughed at you, as I didn’t believe in that nonsense. Agnostic at best, atheist at worst I had mixed feelings about God. Seek , and continue to seek until something is given. This is what I did after seeing my granddaughters auras with no scientific explanation for the different colors. Seeking with the understanding that God , a after life, and a soul is real is the KEY to the Holy Spirit baptism of fire 🔥, bridal chamber, Agitation marvel, and repose I was born from.
It doesn’t matter what you call it. Opening the third eye. Connecting to the spirit world, or connecting to God. Seeking with faith is the KEY to finding. When you are given you better have faith , because the first thing you see with your new eyes to see is your own personal cup of sin. It is very disturbing. The Agitation part of the Agitation, marvel, and repose spoken about in the book of Thomas . The marvel is the undeniable supernatural way it is delivered. Trust me when I say that we know not what we do. Arrogance, egos, hate, jealousy, bullying, weakness in the flesh, and denial of God is part of the pain of our cup. The very cup Jesus prayed about prior to his crucifixion . It’s important to note that he didn’t pray about the physical torture he was going to endure prior to the days end. He prayed about the more painful thing. He prayed about the cup. Not his cup mind you as he was Emanuel ( God with us). The perfect spotless lamb of self sacrifice. Showing us not only that he defeated death, but like a true father showing us he was not asking us to endure anything he himself ( completely innocent) wasn’t willing to endure. Showing us the way of our creator. You can expound all day on the physical nature of physics, and our material world. However until you open your eyes to the spiritual part of the world we live in you will remain in darkness. If you are of the light you will enlighten, for if you do not enlighten you are in darkness, and risk becoming darkness. That lightbulb may not emit what you call light. However it is all irrelevant if you do not understand that God is light.
beautiful.....
Oh how easily people are impressed/convinced by big words/smuggery.
Nah. He's technically not wrong. He is just describing it a bit different.
This dude look like a sith. Maybe its the hoodie
And the jawls
Yeah, I thought the same. Until I realised I did not have a clue what a sith is.
The most valued thing... is when we accept that we do not understand anything.
We are all but wise sages or great gurus, regardless of any rationale, human knowledge will always be incomplete.
There is a thing in this community around Ken "guru" wheeler, and that thing is capable of generating great deals of conflicts between people... do you know why?
Because everyone is so keen on being knowledgeable, on getting it, on understanding,
but look inside, introspect your reasons, why do you want it?
Is it not because of petty pride or egocentric reasons?
All that I observe run after "mastery of knowledge" lazily, through pure intuition and force-inserting artistical and 'beauty-inspiring' ideas, when the problem isnt the ideas themselves nor the inspiration that they seem to give to those that "get it", the problem is the drive behind it all, to feed that pesky ego.
We all *know nothing* Ken, and we wont ever know.
All that we can do is an effort towards getting to know ourselves a little bit more.
But right now, all that you're doing is the same ages-old behavior of "imposing power" that our animalistic drives wants us to commit. You're playing "I have the biggest schlong" but in another domain, and in another form.
Brilliant Light Power Inc... a company shattering the current paradigm of quantum mechanics.
put that light globe in your mouth and light it up uncle fester
"Your inability to grasp science is not a valid argument against it!". I think this sums up this ridiculous video quite well. ^^
How does our shameful science explain consciousness? Are you even conscious? If you are then it's time to expand it-its called evolution
JannikThomas :Couldn't agree more. This utterly arrogant clown is playing with words just to show off. His phrases, when analyzed, unveil a constant intention to be fantastic and controversial just to politically steer people into believing that Science is bad and that everybody else is an idiot. Just a big IQ going bazooka. What a lost for humanity. It could be so much more useful.
you mean scientism.
Jim Viau and still you keep working 9-5 in a system that you don’t even understand, believing what exactly? the mainstream knowledge and culture that is being served to you by the same system you don’t even understand?
Jim Viau + maybe this guy is really a clown, im not even watching the video right now, but if you want to impose your beliefs to someone so arrogantly, better explore everything.
+ Explain how we had no significant scientifical breakthroughs in the past how many years, and just for the notion, care to explain this too. The guy on who’s research 95% of technology we use today is based, had over 300 patents, including radio, ac , etc... believed in the aether(ether). His name was Nikola Tesla, just for you to know
What put you onto this topic? I checked out your older vids and this seems a bit random. Random in a great way though, I love it. Thanks for the information! Subbed!
Light is neither a wave or particle. Light is a coaxial circuit of longitudinal compressions & rarefractions, and transverse electrical and magnetic divergences.
Facebook froze me from sharing after putting this on my timeline.
Ether is just an other word for the atmosphere, there isn't something special.
I am about ready to say let’s look at things another way. Be inside the black hole and crawling out! Lol
Is this a Mike Myers character?
come on, bro, there's no space station
You shouldn't have corrected,"International Space Statement"; that's more correct considering theres so many empty words coming from NASA.
Just because you cannot understand NASA doesn't mean they say "empty words".
@@montex66 "NASA" hasn't anything to understand; perhaps the employees might give it a go, but an administration doesn't fall into that category. And besides, I'd rather spend my time reading Feynman, Steinmetz, Kozyrev and Tesla.
And everything you have said in this whole video is "descriptions" also. You have no proofs or explinations either...
Time for expanding our consciousness-your particle physics can't explain consciousness either, are you conscious?
@@michellejaquish8392 regardless of what you would LIKE everyone to believe, making empty assertions is not the same thing as expanding consciousness.
@@michellejaquish8392 "well you cant explain it so I must be right", right?
Motion and repose... isn't mystical lol. Okay another question... Could it be that the LIM (Local Interstellar Medium) is the same as a toroidal medium?
Beautiful. I always come back to you and I always find a friend telling me where I was stuck.
Thx, bro.
Kindest regards,
M.
Much Love, Light, Compassion And Child Like Wonder For Life For The Highest Potential Of All Creation To All For All
Simply Divine : What ???
@@jimviau327 Sending Everyone Much Love, Light, Compassion And Child Like Wonder For Life For The Highest Potential Of All To Everyone That Reads!!!!
Maxwells ether is called nowadays quantum vacuum.
Amazing how you can BS your self and believe it.
Tbonyandsteak Start to actually get what the words he is using actually mean, then you might start getting it. Ken uses interesting sentence structure and words to get his idea across, but eventually it comes together and it’s like an awe moment.
@@m4iled I get it all right.
The Fear of using the E word.
Which is banned through all the so called Science community
Cooouuuugh Cult..........
No wonder some call it a religion.
I bet you if they were ever associate Eather with Science,
Their career of ranks is over.
In my country, it is an option that can choose to pay tax for the church or not.
Same ting should be done on if you want your tax money go to that cults mad meaningless projects.
Tbonyandsteak my bad, thought you were saying this dudes comment was BS lol
@@m4iled ahh no need for sorry, just sorting out.
Somebody needs to work with this guy to explain his ideas to normal people.
I LOVE your mind!! You're a wonderful soul to explain these things to us. Thank You!!! 😊
The feminine version of this guy'z presence in the universe currently is my stepmom believe it or not. Features, tattoos, behavior, views, intelligence are all the same or very similar. I mean different fields of intelligence but same levels. She is a teacher and cannot stand ignorance
Hey stop groping the elephants
He didn't mention the one blind guy groping the balls.... LMAO
Very informative! Do you have any ideas about gravity? Could it be pressure and not attraction? The heavy elements making voids and the "ether" trying to fill it?
Nuclear reactor never created 1 watt of electricity. It a water heater.
If the aether exists then the michelson Morley proves earth does not move? That's what science is instead of saying the earth does not move they stated that the aether does not exist!
Mmx is flawed but even so it only proves that ether is not a static medium ie a completely currentless ocean, the density of it changes and varies based on a number of factors
About your "descriptions not being explanations" tangent, you're right to say that a description is not an explanation. However, it's easier to explain when you put it in perspective, by describing what's happening qualitatively so that you can delve into the quantitative aspects. Metal moving in a magnetic field creates electrical currents, and electrical currents have EM properties. Thus, the copper dropping is slowed because the copper creates its own set of fields that either repel or, as you'd explain, undergo deceleration due to countervoidance of the dielectric field vortices interacting.
Also, your argument about there being no quantitative difference between a light bulb and a laser isn't quite true when you consider the net displacement of the light. While lasers are highly inefficient, they direct as much light as possible in almost one vector, whereas a light bulb disperses its light via nearly infinite vectors, radiating outwards from almost all spherical directions but the void created from the threaded base of the bulb. Thus, the net vector of the light from a laser is greater than the net vector of the light from a light bulb- it's energy density that sets the two light sources apart. Whether this "light" is a particle, wave, etherial pressure wave or otherwise, it's not too difficult to quantitatively explain why they behave differently once you put it in a qualitative perspective. :)
yea we basically don't really claim to know how to 'quantify' a magnetic field any more than we do a gravity field. but we can still use our rough quantification and measurements to yield calculable results. however the only way we can really quantify light at this time in a way that we can convert into units of energy is by using efficacy standards. and these efficacy standards are in no way absolute, and only based upon the highest efficiency we are insofar able to achieve. technically speaking, without the quantification he is referring to in this video, we can say today that 1 watt of power can potentially produce let's say 1 million lumens. most would agree this is not the case, but I don't think there is really a way to prove otherwise.
Magneticitist I think you kind of got what I was saying, but... what I meant was you can quantify how many lumens you get per given area, and how it changes over distance. Here's an example:
5w laser, 5w bulb. If we create an intersecting set of planes perpendicular to each other (x,y,z > 360 [degrees] x 360 x 360), the laser emits light from no measurable angle from the x-plane with the 360 degree measurement, but it does splay apart on the y- and z- planes, by 1/8-degrees.
The bulb, however, releases light in 360 in the x-plane, and 270 in the y- and z- planes (base of the bulb obstructs the light). Same input energy, different area in which the output is dispersed.
this guy gets it, it's still not actually the right formula when it comes to light in but it's the reliable form of knowing the amount of lighting needed to achieve that result that is perfectly workable and not spend an hour calculating it lol. The dude just doesn't understand some principles so just rejects science in general but still I think he has a complex of wanting to appear scholarly to appeal to his sense of self worth which I could take some guesses at why but my doctorate wasn't in psychology and some theories about some behaviors I don't fully understand but it doesn't mean I should reject the theory
I think the funny thing is that you aren't really saying anything which contradicts his points.
You're still talking about quality.
"A lightbulb 'creates' decoherent light and a laser 'creates' coherent light." Yup.
The quality of one is coherent, the quality of the other is incoherent, as you just explained.
Right, I am talking about a quality. However, I explained *how to quantify that quality*. The coherence and net emission of the light is the quantifiable factor in the quality described. True, the same amount of light is going out of either apparatus. The difference is in where it goes, which can be spatially quantified, hence the difference in net results. Theoria's explanation discards that spacial quantity, hence why it's wrong.
is that magnet warping the picture around it? sometimes when you move it, it seems like the video image directly around it gets warped towards it.
Very interesting! Also Eric P Dollard is the man!! 👍🏻