Supreme Court Rejects Bid To Restrict Abortion Pill | The View
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
- After the Supreme Court unanimously rejected a bid from a group of anti-abortion rights doctors to restrict an abortion pill, #TheView co-hosts weigh in. abcn.ws/2RiH3wd
Subscribe to our UA-cam channel: bit.ly/2Ybi4tM
MORE FROM 'THE VIEW':
Full episodes: abcn.ws/2tl10qh
Twitter: / theview
Facebook: / theview
Instagram: / theviewabc - Розваги
They're just covering their exposed asses. The threat is NOT contained
Ove never seen a woman except in the case that she is a victim that can't prevent pregnancy
What's w/Sara today? YIKES.
@truthbtold8697 that's because you haven't talked to a lot of women. Birth control fails.... Ectopic Pregnancies Happen.... Incomplete miscarriages happen.
That's horrible. Even the Bible agrees with me! Numbers 5: 11 - 5: 22 allows chemical abortions. 😮 @@truthbtold8697
Now to see what Trump is asking the Republicans to do to keep his a== out of jail!
Still don't trust 'em.
Ana Navarro nailed it at the end "women need to vote" 💯
Funny fact here, if women didn't vote we would never have a Democratic President again. True story
White women who vote for the GOP are the problem.
I sincerely doubt that. Repubs are the ones always infringing on women's rights constantly while having taxpayers pay for VIAGRA for congress and the military. @hunterjr666 are you just hoping more women will want to be #tradwife and only do what their husband says.
Women need to vote… in THEIR best interests.
@@hunterjr666you think ALL women vote Democrat? That is NOT true! If BLACK women didn’t vote, there would never be a Democratic president. There IS a difference!
The court is still comprised.
Read as *compromised*
compromised*, but yes.
Only when you disagree 😂😂😂
Yes it is comprised. Public education failed you.
@@truthbtold8697 MAGA Dk
Still have no Faith in SCOTUS
Im sorry you can’t buy contraceptive pills sir. Lol
Me neither 😢😢😢
I still have no faith in old men running my republic
😂😂we know ❄
@@edzzz5043 MAGA TRICK
Doesn't make me feel any better about the shady SCOTUS
You're right. It was rejected based on the STANDING of the case and NOT the merits. Basically SCOTUS said the party appealing had NO grounds to plead. So now other states who do have grounds on standing (Basically to claim to be victimized by the law to provide contraceptives) will try to. It ain't over and they will now try to ban this on merit once they get past the standing issue.
P.s. Sarah and Sunny are wrong here.
It shouldn't. When a better case comes before them they will do it then.
Oh please, Supreme Court ignores standing often! Anna is 100% right! Issue is not resolved, just kicked down the can! No restoration of faith in this court, PERIOD!
Change the Supreme Court. Expand it or demand retirements of Alito and Thomas.
You're right. It was rejected based on the STANDING of the case and NOT the merits. Basically SCOTUS said the party appealing had NO grounds to plead. So now other states who do have grounds on standing (Basically to claim to be victimized by the law to provide contraceptives) will try to. It ain't over and they will now try to ban this on merit once they get past the standing issue.
P.s. Sarah (which sadly is starting to become a reoccurring event) is wrong here.
To have legal standing, a party must demonstrate that they have a sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party’s participation in the case. The U.S. Supreme Court has outlined three key elements that a party must satisfy to establish standing:
*Injury in Fact:*
The plaintiff must have suffered or be imminently threatened with a concrete and particularized injury. This means that the harm must be actual or imminent, not hypothetical, and must affect the plaintiff in a personal and individual way.
*Causation:*
There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of. The injury must be fairly traceable to the defendant's actions and not the result of the independent action of some third party not before the court.
*Redressability:*
It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury. This means that the court must be able to provide relief that directly addresses the harm suffered by the plaintiff.
*Additional Considerations*
Prudential Standing: Beyond these constitutional requirements, courts may impose additional prudential limitations on standing. These are judicially created rules, such as the prohibition against litigating generalized grievances more appropriately addressed by the legislative branch, or the requirement that a plaintiff's complaint fall within the "zone of interests" protected by the law invoked.
@rgomoffat Those two will retire when Trump is relected. They want to retire under a Republican president. They are needed when we can't settle a problem. Such as Bush -Gore.
@@HelloToYours For some reason Sarah has taken upon herself to defend the conservatives and the supreme court at any cost. So sad.
I don't think anyone likes abortion. But if it is necessary it has to be safe, legal and rare. It's a horrible choice to have to make, but the choice must be available to anyone who must make it.
It shouldn’t have to just be “necessary” for someone to have an abortion. They should be allowed to have one just because they simply do not want a child.
He who is without ovaries shall not make laws for those who do!
Fallopians 5:12
@@evamclaughlin1585Numbers 5: 11- 5: 22 allows chemical abortion.... what's ridiculous is this Bronze age text limits this process to the husband's decision. Kind of contradictory on many levels.
@@MemphisTiger not if they aren't responsible with their sex lives they are not!
@@brad3706 we do not care what they thought or what any misogynists think this isn't men's business!!
I agree with Ana. They didn't rule on the issue, but the technicality. This is not a done deal
yes they did because no one can just say they want something removed just because they personally oppose it
no one has standing, the drug is safe.
Except they have already proven they are happy to overturn 50 YEARS OF ACCEPTED LAW. You are daft if you think they won’t take the opportunity when it comes.
WHY THE HECK DO THEY HAVE ANY SAY OVER A WOMAN'S CHOICE OVER HER BODY!!!!!
Exactly, who the heck are they, are they the Mosiah? Will they be there when The Mosiah call on me
they have no right! don't listen to them.
SCOTUS includes 4 women
They have no say! Me and my doctor will be the ONLY ones making my medical decisions!!! Now and Forever 💯💯🙏🙏
Mabey because it's not Just your body once you are pregnant it's also another body. I can't believe you women are THIS DUMB.
They also did it to try to salvage their damaged reputation. Their disapproval rates are at all time high
Exactly
💯
You're right. It was rejected based on the STANDING of the case and NOT the merits. Basically SCOTUS said the party appealing had NO grounds to plead. So now other states who do have grounds on standing (Basically to claim to be victimized by the law to provide contraceptives) will try to. It ain't over and they will now try to ban this on merit once they get past the standing issue.
P.s. Sarah (which sadly is starting to become a reoccurring event here) is wrong here.
The Supreme Court is not a popularity contest. Their job is to interpret the law based on the constitution and legal precedent, just like Sara said.
@@HelloToYourshow many times did you paste the same comment?
This absolutely does not absolve the Supreme Court judges of their sins. Remember what they did to Roe and vote accordingly!
No medals for SCOTUS. A broken clock...
WOMEN ROAR IN 24!!💙💙VOTE BLUE💙💙!!!
For you and our children..a MAGA nightmare coming for us again.
To my everlasting shame I voted for that stumblebum biden last time .. never again..MAGA in 2024. ✌️♥️🇺🇸
That's a good slogan lol
Sure!!! What about defending the real woman’s in sports? Oh they are not important enough for your agenda huh!!
TRUMP 2024🎉 I will be voting for TRUMP.
I DONT TRUST THE CLOWNS OF THE Supreme Court.
Not all of them are clowns. There’s three on the right side. Calm down.
its funny to watch CNN and the " view" whip you idiots into a frenzy.... they follow the constitution thats it
I don’t trust democrats and liberals
We wouldn’t even have a country anymore if it wasn’t for the Supreme Court and just because they don’t bend to the will of psychotic progressives does not make them clowns.
Irrespective of anyone’s opinion, nobody has the right to make a choice regarding a woman’s body, except that woman and her doctor.
Geez Louise, restricting birth control? This is disgusting!!!!!!!
SCOTUS is just running scared...vote blue💙
They are not scared at all they are in complete control and psychotic progressives crying because they can’t have their way is the fuel that drives them. You need a reason not to vote blue look at Canada lol.
Uh, there was a door left open for someone to bring this before the court who DOES have standing.
That’s what they said!
no one. It's a safe drug!!
The Scotus vote is only delayed as it was a technical problem…..they did not have standing.
no it isn't they cannot take away this medication just because misogynists want them to
Its sad that in 2024, there's still a fight regarding women's rights!
Imagine being a woman of colour?
Women have access to birth control, no need for abortion, only under some situations.
Term limits on supreme court justices
Sarah! WTF?? Are you kidding? And 50 years of precedent? Oy vey. 🤦🏽♀️
She is not very bright
Sara represents all the ditzes out there. I find her annoying.
She has always been extremely naive.
Please no more oy vey it’s over Lindsey Lohan
@@gerardoresendiz6731 Not sure what you mean by that, but what I am sure of is that you can fcck right off. 🤙🏾
No appreciation for the term personal CHOICE. Choice means FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY.
We marched in the sixties and we now have BIRTH CONTROL.
What flag Mrs. Alito will fly today 😂
They need to expand the court. I don’t buy none of that they’re saying
women are still using the drug that's what counts and the drug is safe
So they can put more conservatives on it? How will that help?
"Mike Pence's fly" 😂😂😂🪰
I came all the way down to see of someone else caught that 😂😂😂😂😂😂
It's just to look less "biased" before taking more rights away in the future
no senator Whitehouse isn't backing off he's trying to get impeachment started on some of them.
Ana gets it, they actually did squat, the issue will return
no it won't
they have no standing
Still have no faith in the Supreme Court. Nada, zero!
Still vote them out
You can’t vote them out
😂😂the fact you think you can vote Supreme Court Justices out
Would be nice. However, their appointment is for life.
@@johnhoffman1161can vote out the republicans who appoint these justices
Vote out to the GOP!
We win but are still angry! Rage on ladies, rage on.
This is good. But it's no time to go to sleep. If anything their trying to soften us up. 😒💙
Yes because Senator Whitehouse is exposing their corruption and impeachment is coming to them soon.
joy looks 64. She's 81... she could be the mother of a 61 year old.
I’m holding my breath until they release their decision on the immunity case. Generally, I don’t have faith in SCOTUS. But, the real nail in the coffin will be if they rule in Trump’s favor later this month.
When will they be making that decision?
they are afraid some of them will be impeached because of Senator Whitehouse
We don’t know the official day, but SCOTUS goes to recess in June/Early July, so we should expect a ruling sometime before then.
They've already done what Trump wanted. They've delayed his court case.
They saw what their Dobbs decision did to all their GOP buddies 😂😂😂
Those released tapes is why they pushed back
What released tapes? I dont think I have heard about them.
"They want us in the kitchen, with ten kids, that we can't feed." That's the crux of it. "Pro-life", isn't. They're "pro-birth, and then once the kid is popped out, you're on your own."
Wtf are you people on? We invented BIRTH CONTROL!!! 🙄
That's simply not true. Pro life people are over represented in adoption, women's and babies shelters etc. But keep shelling the narrative that works for you.
"They want us in the kitchen with 10 kids that we can't feed" a word from joy
Then stop sleeping around.
we're not listening and now we can stock up on the medication
women you don't have to obey men especially not misogynists
don't obey their misogynistic laws either
And who is supporting, educating, housing, clothing, feeding, and nurture these children? DNA tests make these males pay for everything in a manner the same as his family. Rich family, kid gets the best of everything including a home for the child’s mother. Plus schooling, including college and university VIP style. Let’s see how many of these males are willing to sign before the act that F a child is produce from that union, the male pays for it all
What ever happened to the HIPPA law? And why is it NEVER brought up!?????😮 alito is a traitor true to form just like every Republican…..these people need to mind their own business - my body is none ya
I don't think you understand what *HIPAA actually is
HIPAA doesn’t relate to this issue.
@@lukerinderknecht2982In order for lawmakers to subject people to punishments regarding health care, they would be accessing that private medical information.. which is illegal under HIPAA regulations.
@@Birdsong-Annalee thank you these people (men) don’t get it but us women do 💜
@@lukerinderknecht2982 yeah right
I wish our government cared about education as much as they care about women and what we do with our own bodies.
Jesus Christ I’m so over Sara’s middle of the road BS.
Yea everything has to be extreme with you clowns!
the drug is safe and women are using it and stocking up on it everywhere
Me too. Sarah's rightwingerism rears its ugly head in almost every topic these days.
Mitch McConnell played a large part in ensuring that we have a conservative SCOTUS when he refused to let Merrick Garland have hearings(he was appointed by Obama) and then rushed through the hearings for Amy Coney-Barrett.
The ruling wasn't about abortion or medication. It was about standing OR it could be seen as a way for them to sidestep the issue while they are under such scrutiny. Don't breathe easy yet.
Don't over react. They have reasons, like the Comstock Act, up their sleeves.
Time for term limits for the SCOTUS, we should be able to vote them out. Btw, what is Sarah talking about, we don’t need to have “faith” in the SCOTUS when their actions don’t warrant ANY trust to begin with, looks who’s in it!!!
Anna is more accurate with the info regarding the Supreme Court than Sonny. It’s about the issue not the process. They are coming for woman’s rights
Watch them give Trump immunity…this is a makeup call like in sports.
They’re trying to save face.
Did she just say she has some faith in the high court? I have zero faith in SCOTUS
The decision is strategic. They have themselves stuck in a deep hole..
They just refused to hear the case...they made no ruling ,except to do nothing
yes they did. the drug is safe and it's still being used right now
stop fear mongering!
“Translation?” Joy kills me😂😂😂
Which is right, a privacy issue
Actually, I think it seems like it's more of a freedom of choice and bodily autonomy issue. A woman's right to make any and every choice about her own body has been cancelled wherever abortion bans have been instituted. Also, the concept of privacy is relatively new. One could also argue that if even one person knows your "secret" or private info., then you may technically not have any privacy due to the possibility of your info being revealed.
@@m.w.njoroge7438 I agree with your assessment
NO. Don't get it twisted. They agreed 9-0 that they shouldn't have taken up a case THAT THEY KNEW that they shouldn't have taken up. They didn't agree on the law. They agreed that the petitioner didn't have standing. The petitioner presented a 100% hypothetical case where they could not show injury necessary to be heard IN THE LOWEST COURT.
Supreme Court confidence job, Roberts, Alito, Thomas all need to go for this one, and take Kavanaugh with you. .
This is an appeasement ruling, so that when they let the orange cult leader off the hook😂
The decision was made by the same court that two years ago overturned Roe v Wade - which had previously given women rights to terminate a pregnancy.
They rightfully let the individual states determine their own abortion laws.
SARA IT'S SUCH A REP, JUST LYING
Why? Is it because she has common sense and integrity. Unlike Joy saying that the right wants women in the kitchen with ten kids and no way to feed them. No one wants that.
Well, this is interesting.
Hey, if you can get this in the mail.
But, still be weary of the present Supreme court.
This country is cooked. We need a reset.
That’s what the GQP is trying to do, for worse
Civil wars never work...they just change the dictators
I think Sara needs to clarify her last comment.
Can't wait for MarthaAnn Karen Alito's take on this...
This may be the first time Josh Hawley's wife has argued a case before the court and *failed* to terminate someone's rights. Usually they allow her to predate freely on her fellow Americans.
Anyone remember Lori Smith, “Christian” wedding cake designer? She had no standing and yet… Give the majority on the Supreme Court time, they’re ready and willing to take this right away, too. They just need the right plaintiff.
#voteblue! Let's protect our rights!
Anna, you need to run for office.
The government and courts need to STH out of womans choices
they will be when they are impeached
…until they find someone with standing to bring it back. They didn’t rule on the actual issue
EVERYONE is pro-life. Regarding abortion access, you're either pro-choice or anti-choice.
Birth control is choice. 🙄
They didn't rule against it, they just said that the complainant did not have standing to bring the suit
Anyone else can bring the same suit up again
They just don't want to rule on it right now
Probably because to many people are already upset with them and they don't want to take the heat for this one right now
because the drug is safe
It’s a massive fly; it looks like a chihuahua 😂😂😂
Of course scotus will write that cause they know states will still try to ban it. 😢
no the drug is safe and has good standing
@@Love_Daisys the problem lies not in the drug effectiveness
@@tjahjadijudono-zc5jn look please give up misogynists are not going to win this or the election
@@tjahjadijudono-zc5jn yes it does because if it doesn't hurt anyone besides their little feelings they have no standing and the supreme courts said they don't take these cases
If men were the ones to become pregnant, do you believe the GOP would still vote against abortion?
Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett should resign from the court as they have showed that they can not put the Constitution above Party. We need 5, maybe 6, new justices.
God will always win.
You people know what this means right? They’re about to rule in trump’s favor.
So true! That's exactly what I thought!
Of course ! That's expected . Trump will be immuned from the law.
that's wrong! they are afraid because the Justices may be facing impeachment especially Alito and Thomas and Roberts too
Trump 2024🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@@mslolalucky trump jail 2024 🇺🇸
Sarah seems confused?
You’re right that since it’s based on standing, there could still be an adverse decision were the case to be brought by someone with standing. They’re making decisions that give stare decisis a black eye.
FOR NOW....its left open to future challenges....
Don’t let them appease you, it’s just a cover up for show. Vote 💙
they can't take this drug, it's safe but stock up on it anyway and learn to help women who need safe abortions by learning how they're performed in case of emergency situations
I think you misunderstood. I was talking about the Supreme Court appeasing the women temporarily for votes like a sucker moment. I never had to go through that ordeal. I worry about the future for the children/women who have difficulty with pregnancy or graped victims.
Talk about Project 2025
They are feeling the pressure. Don't get too excited.
This is too late. In states that have already banned all forms of abortion, and their are 14 of them, this pill is still banned!.
You know what would be a great idea? To create a Jr. The View show. A show with much, much younger women personalities to engage younger viewers
Jr. Is a swear word now😂...but good idea😊 💙
How many talk show do you know about?
Sponsorships determine what you watch. This show became popular and now has a bit more freedom to voice their opinions instead of the political rhetoric on sponsor reliant less watched shows.
You mean younger viewers are incapable of sitting down, listening to women older than them, and respecting what the older women have to say. Younger viewers need to engage with all ages within the population. So stop practicing ageism.
@@blue-vu1ek no, it wasn't as serious as all that. I thought it would be a fun show. That is all.
WHO are the shareholders of that pill company?
They have so much ethics pressure on them they're like "lets throw them a bone, whether we agree or not, to get them off our tail!
It's between the Dr and the woman right
Remember Trump and the supreme Court got rid of pro choice!!!
People need to stop worrying about the price of gas and eggs and start worrying about really important things that effect our health and lives!😒🤦
Spoken like a true elitist.
Thank god I can still serve up plan B omelets in the morning before they got to go.
2:00 "a PLAGUE of flies"?? ONE FLY??? She's doing EXACTLY what she doesn't want others to do.
Smokescreen for when SCOTUS grants trumps wish for “Absolute Presidential Unicorn Immunity!”
nope they know some of them are up for impeachment
Kavanaugh gave states a blue print on how to do it themselves.
No. They said there was no standing so they didn't accept it. That's not a ruling. When they get a better case they can bring it again.
Great question! "What flag will she fly today?"
Alito's dress 🥻
Ana Navarro always talk so good about Joe Biden and so bad about Donald Trump
As she should. DT for Prison 2024!
@@Heartboy1031 This is a crazy bot that's been posting meaningless comments since forever. Don't waste your time responding to it.
Glad!
Sara represents the ditz coalition. Really annoying.
On Sarah's comments that the court needs to show a legal argument and use legal principles for their decisions, how does she then explain their decision in Dobbs which overturned Roe? If she followed the supreme Court cases, she would know that they regularly ignore legal principles to come to the ruling that they want.
Stare decisis means “to stand by things decided” in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make their decision in alignment with the previous court's decision.
This foundational legal principle was ignored in their decision on Dobbs.
This particular example was just too egregious to ignore that the plaintiffs had no standing.
A technicality won't stop them from banning it next time.
This seems like a chess move to me. I'm skeptical.
the drug is safe, they are being exposed and want the heat to back off