RugbyX: Women's Final - England vs USA
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- Sign up to stay updated on all things RugbyX - RugbyX.com
Full coverage of the intense final between England and USA during the evening session of the inaugural RugbyX.
Subscribe to RugbyX - bit.ly/2OgBD07
FOLLOW us for more RugbyX related content
Twitter | / rugbyxofficial
Facebook | / rugbyxofficial
Instagram | / rugbyxofficial
They should have continued until somebody fails
Exactly! Oh well, it was played in London. They have to win against our Ladies.
@@lawrencemonks9458 we beat ‘your’ ladies everywhere
Exactly, this was some BS!!
Sudden death definitely needs to be reworked.
Actually i really like the idea of the 1 v 1
yeah, 1v1 is good but needs to be more like football penalties
How did they win??
@@ranierahoro5398 cus they started first they were the first to get to three? 😑
@Liam B thats so stupid and how is that even fair
Yeah...that is such an unfair way to decide the match
Right? Even the brits were surprised. Might as well flip a coin.
The one on one format was fantastic, but the fact that no one failed to score and the match was still decided is unfair and needs to be reworked. I will still follow rugbyX with interest.
‘Drop off’ would of been more suitable. After the draw, Start with five players and every minute drop one player from each team till you get to one player and the winning team goes to.......
That way of deciding a winner was a nonsense
What a shit way to decide the match?
That wasn't fair at all.
Absolutely bizarre finish. First to 3 when the other side has only had 2 turns?!?!?! WTF? RugbyX looked fairly interesting. I won't be watching again.
it's all in ya surname, Coetzee. nothing more to add.
@@blackbob3358 that sounds impressively racist.
Just watched the mens matches and this, they have taken rugby and Americanized it. Not something that interests me. We already have the short version of the game in 7s.
Yeah but sevens on a full pitch in the rain is rubbish, looks nothing like real rugby running backwards and no- man rucks. Indoor half pitch madness! I'd play this would never play sevens.
@@aramanon 7s on a full pitch is rubbish regardless the weather. On the contrary, I'd like to see a 7-on-7 version of the game played on a hockey rink-sized pitch.
@@stefanofocacci that would be stupid a full pitch is fine it shows the fitness and skill of each player you might aswell play wheelchair rugby then
Touch lines should be made far narrower for the 1v1.
Wait whaaa. How was that fair. First team w ball in sudden death gets three attempts and the other team doesn't get to a third attempt? The whole 1v1 is pretty silly. The field is so small that there's no open field to make a 1v1 tackle.
Do not understand the final knockout? Everyone scored? Poor technique for a decider. Two on Two would be better.
This game isn't fair lol!
Not for me. It try's to take all the best bits from seven's and fifteen's and misses them all.
This sport is catered to distract the masses.
england did good but shouldent be awared more chances because they were down
makes no faking sense
The attacker should get less of a running start for the 1v1 at the end. how about 10 meters at midfield?
how does england start that last part when they were behind and scored the equalizer at the end
I don't understand the decider fair play to england though
They should do 2 on 2 for extra time. Give the defenders more chance to make a tackle
Shouldn’t be first to 3, USA should’ve gotten a chance to level it. Just copy how penalties work and have the winner based off defense rather than attack.
The England team didn't even notice that they won. The 1v1 needs work
I think they just needed to cut the programme short quickly because they needed to time it so the next show could come on. Normally, it would be until somebody failed.
Wow!! These girls can play!!
Should have been sudden death, with play starting like in basketball
One on one badly designed. Ball carrier has too much chance to build momentum.
1v1 was an anti climax
Undeserved the 1v1 needs to be changed England didn’t deserve to win that and it’s unfair to the US team
Man if they made a fifa like rugby game, this could be the Volta football for it
Is it mean or this feels to much of fast pace and similar to Rugby League. Cause the NRL is that fast with 13 players on each side.
Luke Sky walker nah it’s more like touch or sevens
Both finals were ridiculous.The woman's game finished with England having an extra attempt in the shootout and in the men's game the final try was scored by the 6th player on the paddock. Game needs more work
It's seven players, not six.
Hermes Bouza it’s 5 aside not 7. Did you even watch the video?
@@EL-V-ENzFlyest Mate. It's five-a-side, and you have two players ("active substitutes") for the quick throw-ins, have you watched the video?
Hermes Bouza if you watched the men’s final you would know that the player who is meant to throw the ball in runs on and scores the game winning try as the 6th player on the park
@@EL-V-ENzFlyest The men's final has just been uploaded. I'd suggest you to watch it, since it ended 5-3 and there was no game-winning try.
Nakkada okk vikaram Anne ee game ee game ishttamullaver arokkayannee
They should do the sudden death with both teams doing it at the same time on opposite ends until someone fails.
The sudden death 1v1 should be a run it straight challenge
This is weird form of rugby😂
Very exciting final. Excellent performance by team of England. Thank you all.
🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
...I would be curious to know how many times a defender has STOPPED a ball carrier in the 1v1 of this league? Coming at full force with the full field seems pretty unstopable to me. I would think narrowing the field or doing a 1v2 or 2v2 might work better, or just throw out a few more minutes of time for OT.
this is not rugby
I kept pausing, going back ...waiting who was going to be stopped. Nothing. What a stupid way to end a game.
I feel for you American girls,this final deserved two winners.
rugby x logic : so this teams in the lead and the other team scores hmmm lets give the team who was down more chanses like wtf
Lol first to 3
Goo UKk❤❤
That sudden death reminds me of the old school American Gladiators
naya tapper won her 1on1 though!
How many high tackles?
Wtf! This my first time seeing this competition, awesome!
what an unfair system first to 3 needs to be equal turns untill someone fails
why arn't they cheering
Fabulous entertainment and what a star Emma Uren is!
wow manly
Ridiculous ,, ,who came up with this rugby x crap.....if you want indoor rubbish I suggest you play touch football ....go watch some aussie or kiwis touch games to see how skilled and quick it is
Njan player annee
what is this
Bliksem! These bokkies can jol!
Jy! 😂
what is the name of the seven white shirt girl
This is BS.
Deserved
are you high???
Wow! Some big names playing! Don't think rugby of that quality needs a light show and hooters and Broadway twinkle but Fives looks a much more fun game than sevens any day!
Been sceptical of women's rugby.....especially when people compare it to mens but I have to say that was superb. Brilliant.
Men's rugbyX is OK... Women's rugbyX is Amazing! The best/most entertaining form of women's rugby there is.
To anyone who is a little confused about the decider/shootout, a team gets a point if they score or a point if they stop the other team scoring, first to three points wins. Therefore USA and England had an equal opportunity to take the win. There is arguably an advantage going first as it seems to be easier to score than to defend, this will probably be settled upon in future games. A traditional sudden death style decider would probably be fairer but rugby X isn’t trying to be traditional, it’s emphasis is on fast pace creative rugby.
are you high have you not played rugby attacking in a huge field is so much harder
Firstly, I didn't say this was fair method, I was clarifying the rules for people who weren't sure why England won. Secondly, attacking is not necessarily an advantage, it depends on the size of the pitch, type of surface etc. In this instance, yes attacking is probably easier and the system should be reworked
WEAK.
When did this shit start? Womens Rugby....pffffft!
I’ve lost interest in watching organised sports because when I watch England play I don’t see English players. There are most certainly players I honour as English that don’t have English parents but the UK has gone crazy and handed out UK citizenship like it was confetti. I don’t honour the vast majority of immigrant UK citizens as British. There’s just no way we can absorb that many people in such a short space of time and just say: “Yeah, you’re all English/British now”. It doesn’t work like that.
i could say the same of the South Africans wo are of European countries, what a pansie statement, get a life, its called a global village, if you gonna continue this debate, why not fetch all ypur English brothers and sisters and stop taking the mineral riches of the former colonial countries, lets see where you guys end up.
Well you could say whatever you wish. South African identity is nothing like English or British identity. “Global village”? There can never be any such thing.
@@britopia1341 British people are of mixed ethnicity, roman, spanish, african Scandinavian celtic people, etc before you became a nation, read your own history mate. you aint a pure nation, sorry to burst your bubble, you are a decendant of the indo europeans, the importance of research.
Moosa Vallie Lol, I’d absolutely love it if you could find Roman DNA in the British people living today. Even if you could it’d be so small it wouldn’t be worth mentioning. Those articles you’ve been reading are nonsense.