That's awesome! The 14 is definitely a fun and versatile lens. Which X Series camera are you using and what kinds of subjects do you like to photograph?
Old guy here.... can't Express how much I love the focus clutch system for manual focusing. I came up on manual focus Nikons and Leicas and know how and when zone and hyper focusing can be the best way to go. A wide angle screams for deep focus and the DOF scale and clearly marked distances make this old school way of working easy. Besides the 14mm, Fujifilm's 16mm and 23mm f/1.4 lenses have the clutch system and once you start consistently getting perfect zones and deep hyper focus shots with no guess work, it's hard to lose that capability with lenses that dont have this option. Enjoyed your video.
Albert, thanks for your comment. I also love the DOF scale on the Fuji "clutch" lenses. It's just one more tool that can help you use the skills and experience with regards to DOF and hyperfocal distance. I don't shoot that way all the time, but for certain scenes, it can really come in handy! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I bought an X-T2 and 23mm Fujicron as an experiment. My satisfaction was such that I now have the same setup (I never get rid of anything) and an X-E3, X-Pro2, X-E2s and two X-T3 bodies. I also have redundant 16mm, 23mm and 35mm f/1.4 and f/2 (f/2.8 for the 16mm) sets, plus 18mm and 50mm f/2 lenses and the 60mm f/2.4 macro. Subjects today have been reduced to local street and city/landscape stuff because of the last two years of curtailed travel and social distancing.
Sounds like you've got a very complete setup, Albert! And yes, opportunities have been lifted during the past couple of years, although that does force us to exercise some different creative ideas when looking for subject matter. Hopefully things will start to change soon. Until then, keep having fun with your Fuji gear.
I totally agree with you. The 14 mm lens is my absolute favorite (and also oldest fuji lens) for landscape. Great review with great pictures, i really like your work.
Thanks, Patrik. 👍 Indeed, the 14 2.8 is a winner for sure!! I'm never sorry that I filled valuable camera bag space with that lens, and it never lets me down. Which Fuji do you use and what kinds of landscapes do you like to photograph?
One of the first Fujinon lenses I bought is the 18mm F2. It's loud, but nicely compact and excellent for street and landscape photography. Still, I'm tempted to get me this 14mm.This lens doesn't distort, which is pretty amazing.
I have that tiny little original 18mm f/2 as well, but this 14 really shines with its extra width and excellent image quality. Which camera(s) would you use it with?
@@DanBaileyPhoto For street photography I use my trusted X-A1 because it's so small. I think I'm going to rent the 14mm at some to see if it fits my needs.
There's also the brand new 8mm f/3.5 lens. That's another ultra wide lens with very little distortion. It might be worth checking out: bhpho.to/43hfrIJ
Like you, I owner mine 14mm f2.8 for 9 years, and man, what a great decision I made, this beauty stays always in my bag, rather I go for a paid job, or if I go hiking, It's one of my favorites lenses, never let me down, even as you said in your video, in the rain and ice! The image quality and the form factor are just perfect, so well balanced! I have zoom lens too but just for work only,! This joy is a great companion and suits so well for a nice range of fixed lenses with my other two, the 23mm f2 and the 56mm f1.2. The only complaint that I have, is the diaphragm rig, it's a little lose for my taste but other than that its just a unique angle of view, and not so common as the 16mm (24mm in 35mm terms), and this only with no virtual distortion, makes this joy a winner! Lovely video man, thanks for sharing.
Thanks for your comment! Yes, the 14 really is great lens, and as you said, the only downside is the rather loose aperture ring. Not a big deal, especially if that's the only thing that's not perfect. Glad you liked this video. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
I bought the 14mm to go with the kit lens in my first Fuji, the Sexy-1 (X-E1). I love the lens, well except for the loose aperture ring, which I fixed with a bit of gaff tape. Shooting cyclocross races it is always one one of my bodies.
Thanks for your comment. Yea, with the later lenses, Fuji definitely made the f/stop rings a little tighter. And I would agree, it's a great lens for shooting CX, some of my all time favorite cyclocross photos were shot with the 14. Where do you like to shoot CX races?
Shooting mountain bike cross country races with the 23mm f/2 or 35mm f/2. Criterium’s on the inside of corners with the 14mm or if I’m using my Canon the 17-40. I like shooting close.
Those kinds of mid range focal lengths, like the 35, and to some extent, the 23, are not what would normally be considered good "action lenses," but if you know how to use them, you can definitely get some good results! 👍
Dan, this really IS a fabulous lens judging by the photos you showed, but I venture to say that this same lens would not produce similar results in most hands. You are a gifted photographer, and you can fully capitalize on what a lens like this can do. Most of us have more limited abilities; for instance, I really don't think that this lens would do a great deal more for me than I'm able to get with my 10-24 wide-angle zoom. Ah, but one can dream...
Hey Daniel, thanks so much for your comment. If you've already got the 10-24 and you're happy with it, then probably not need to switch to the 14. That's the thing we all run into with photography... and everything else in life. There are always so many choices, and at some point, you're going to start duplicating what you already have, and that's not a very productive approach. I run into this myself with music gear. "I need this new pedal," even though I might already have something similar from another brand. Then you're just taking up space and complicating your life. It's all about finding and narrowing down what works for you. Anyway, hope you're doing well and having a good winter. Cheers!
I also love wide-angle lenses. My widest for my full-frame camera is a 14mm f/2.8 Nikkor. My widest for my APS-C is a 12mm f/2.8 auto focus Zeiss and a 12mm f/2 manual focus Rokinon. On my APS-C cameras, I prefer the 12mm focal length to the 14mm focal length because the 12mm focal length gives a 90-degree horizontal angle-of-view. The14mm gives a 90-degree diagonal angle-of-view. It is much easier for me to visualize a 90-degree horizontal angle-of-view as compared to a 90-degree diagonal angle-of-view.
Thanks for your comment. Interesting to note. I've always been a fan of very wide angle lenses. For my Nikons, I had a Tokina 17mm that I loved. Also had the Nikon 14mm, but didn't use that nearly as often. Mostly because it was a much larger, heavier lens. I'm especially interested in the new Fujifilm 8mm, which is quite wide, but also very small and compact. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Over the decades, I shot photojournalism, documentary, macro, scientific/medical, aerial, portraits, still life, landscapes, wildlife, architecture, astronomy, sports, vacation/travel, weddings and other social events. I have a Nikonos underwater camera that I used for shooting in hostile weather, but I never used it for underwater photography.
Dan, I appreciate you sharing your experience! As for myself I have put buying Fujinon prime lenses on hold for the time being, as many of the new autofocus third party lenses that are coming out now look extremely promising, at much lower price points and with up to date focusing technology.
Karsten, thanks for your comment. Yes, lens technology has come a long way, and there are a number of third party options that look promising. Last week on my blog, I wrote about 7 Artisans lenses for Fuji, after trying out three of them. danbaileyphoto.com/blog/a-look-at-7-artisans-lenses-for-fuji/ Depending on the lens, you may not always get AF or full communication with the camera body, and in some cases, the same quality of glass, but that's not to say you can't have a lot of fun and make some great looking photos with non-brand name lenses. When I was a Nikon shooter, one of my favorite lenses was the Tokina ATX 17mm f/3.5. It was in regular, heavy rotation with my Nikon glass and I sold lots of photos that were shot with that lens.
Hi Dan. Your videos never fail to engage my interest. I just got this lens and really excited to take pictures with it. But a little apprehensive about how it will hold up in the places I work in - hot, humid and miserably wet during d monsoon season. Any advice?
Thanks, Lincoln. Really appreciate the feedback. Congratulations on your new 14mm!! Such a great lens. I think you’ll find that even though it’s not weather sealed, it’s still pretty tough. Just be sensible about how you use it and protect it as best you can from getting too wet. The Fuji lenses do hold up well, and I’ve abused my 14mm quite a bit over the years. I’m really wet conditions, the bigger issue is keeping water off the front of the lens so you can actually shoot photos! 😂
Enjoyed the video Dan. Love the wide angle lenses for Landscape and create a story. Have a question regarding lenses. I learned shooting with only 1 fixed lens but I would like to know your thoughts regarding next lens for my bag. I am looking to acquire another lens prior to another excursion to Switzerland. I am not sure whether to go with a zoom or fixed. I understand the flexibility advantages of zoom but are they acceptable as an alternative in terms of quality to 1- additional lens for my trip and long term use. What lens would suggest I acquire. Presently shoot with the 23 f2. Thank you Dan
Hi Mike, thanks for your comment. Regarding fixed vs. zoom lenses, I'd say it comes down to preference. I've always enjoyed the form factor and simplicity of prime lenses in the short to middle range, and zooms on the longer telephoto range. With today's lenses, I'd say that the good ones have comparable quality to similar focal length fixed lenses, so again it comes down to the kind of lens that you want to carry and use. For a travel lens that might work well for travel and compliment the 23mm f/2, there are certainly a few choices out there, but for your second lens, I might suggest a compact and fast short telephoto, like the 50mm f/2, which appears to be in stock at most places right now. With that, you'd have your wide and short telephoto range covered, with just two very tiny lenses. What do you think of that?
Totally agree with your comments on this beautiful lens, I’ve only had mine for a year now because I was after a wide angle of view for infrared photography as I recently had my X-T1 converted. Unfortunately the 10-24 does not work, another lens I really enjoy using. The 14mm 2.8 was perfect for infrared and gives fantastic results and has become my most used lens even on my X-T3. I,m hoping Fujifilm will compliment it soon with a 10 or 12mm in the same design again hopefully this would also work well for infrared....
Noel, thanks for your comment. I never thought about the IR aspect with regard to different lenses. Why is it that the 10-24 doesn't work for infrared photography?
@@DanBaileyPhoto unfortunately with a lot of lenses mostly zooms you get a hot spot at the centre of your image. This is because of how infrared light works and how a lens is constructed. It can be pretty severe on some and only mild in others. The 14mm is the only wide angle that works in the Fuji line up and boy does it work well. The 10-24 is effected quit badly with a hot spot that makes your Images pretty unusable. It’s the same unfortunately with the 16mm.
Noel, very interesting. I had no idea that this was a factor with IR photography, and good to know that the 14 works in this manner. I just learned something new!
Hi Peter, thanks for the comment. Not very often. I used one a lot back when I shot Kodachrome, but I never liked what the polarizer did to the blues in Velvia film, and now with the Velvia film simulations. Of course, the polarizer can help cut reflections and make the colors really pop if you're shooting things like wet leaves, so those are times when it does make a sense to pull it out. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
I've got the 16 f/1.4. A great lens that I've never warmed to. Can't decide if it's because it's too close to my 23 f/2, not wide enough, or I just don't know how to shoot a wide lens. Been considering the 14 f/2.8, or just junking the whole kit. I've got an X-Pro-2 and I hate it. Fiddly ISO/Shutter Speed dial, tiny EVF, no IBIS, crap battery life... Shot with an X-T4. Too small for my hands, hated the LCD was not a true flip screen, and couldn't use the EVF without smashing my nose into the LCD. I love Fuji glass, but I'm at a real crossroads with the brand because I can't find a body I like. Common wisdom is to buy into a line for the glass, but I've done that and I'm not happy. Thoughts?
Tom, sorry to hear that you're having a hard time finding a suitable Fuji body, because you're right, the glass is very good. I've always felt the same way with the 23, it's a great lens, but not quite wide enough for me. To me, the 14 perfectly fits in the bounds of what a wide angle should be. And it's light, fast, and quite a bit more compact than the 16.
@@DanBaileyPhoto It's frustrating because since I hate the X-Pro-2 and can't find a body I like, I don't shoot much anymore. I want to get outdoors and into the Sierra's but my gear is not inspiring me. Selling and starting over seems likely, but the only line I'm attracted to is Canon R. But the money is too much and it gets me right back into a big heavy bag again. To be honest I'm just about ready to give up on photography. Too much money with too many compromises, and no results to show for it.
Again, I'm sorry to hear that. It sounds like you have big hands. The X-T4 seems like it would be the best option, but I can understand your dislike of the flippy screen. It looks like there are still X-H1 bodies available. And the X-S1 is small, but it has a slightly different form factor than the X-T4. Nothing will ever be perfect, but I wouldn't let this make you give up photography. Humans have an incredible ability to adapt.
@@DianneArnold, Fuji never said the H2 is coming out this year, matter of fact they said they will release the H2 when they feel there’s technological advancements and if they haven’t found those worthy advancements in February 2021 there will be no H2 in 2021.
Thanks for your comment. Yes, the 14mm isn't the widest lens available, so if you like to go wide, there are definitely options out there. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto for years the 23 1.4 has been my to go lens for especially street photography. Than I wanted to play with a wider angle and bought the 14mm 2,8. This lens does a great job in old cities with canals like Utrecht where I live and Amsterdam; it adds even more character to the city. I just recently discovered the quality of the 35 1.4. When I go to Amsterdam now I leave the heavy 23 1.4 at home and go light with the 14 and the 35. Greetings from Holland
Eric, I have the 23 1.4 too, it's an amazing lens. I don't use it very often, but every time I pull it out, I'm so impressed. I generally prefer wider angle focus lengths, which is why I love the 14mm, but depending on the subject, sometimes the tighter views of the 23 and 35 are just what's needed.
Thanks, John. I do like the 16 f/2.8, it's weather sealed and a little bit more compact than the 14mm. Gives you that classic 24mm angle of view. You can't go wrong with that lens. RE: 28mm, I'm assuming you mean the 23mm f/2. I don't have that lens, but all of the little WR primes are great choices. Small, light, relatively inexpensive and loads of fun! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto hi Dan thanks for your response. I meant 18mm not 28mm. Slip of the thumb. I have the 23 and the 35 f2’s and feel they are both great. I enjoy street, documentary and cityscape photography. My Fuji bodies are the X-T30 and the X-E2.
Got it. I have the 18 f/2, and while it's also a fun lens, I'd say that between the 16 and 18, I prefer the 16mm f/2.8. It's a little bit wider and weather sealed. And it has a newer technology, faster AF motor. The motor on the 18 is a little slow. Between the 14mm and 18mm, though, that's an easy choice. 14 all the way.
Sounds like a great lens, but it's always the same problem: so many great things, so little cash. I do have the XF 10-24 (the original, not the revised edition) and it addresses my wide-angle needs perfectly for just about the same price and more versatility. Do I want to spend an extra $900 to save some weight? Not really. I might consider a third-party lens just to travel right in certain situations; the Rokinon is less than half price. Sure, it's manual focus, but for a wide angle it's not really an issue. In a way, it's interesting how demanding we have become. These days, people say things like, "No IBIS, no deal", and to me who grew up with film-based cameras that were manual-everything, this sounds just strange. Anyway, I did enjoy your video (I always like them). Keep up the good work!
Daniel, thanks for your insight. You're absolutely right. It the world of reality, there would be no possible way we could buy everything and own every single piece of gear. You have to find the right piece(s) of gear for you, that fit with your style and intended creative ideas. It's all a matter of weighing the benefits against your wallet and the available space in your house, and considering how much you NEED that partial piece of gear, or if you already have something suitable that helps you fulfill your creative urges in a suitable way. I see the same parallels with music. It's all the same. Should I buy that new guitar/amp/pedal? It sure is shiny, and it would probably make me play better... but maybe I already have the gear that lets me play exactly the way I want. I think that we're always chasing something, but in the end, we discover that we already had it right in front of us. Of course, for those people who are indeed in the market for a Fuji wide angle lens, this 14 2.8 is a pretty awesome lens! 😀 Keep up the good work, Daniel and take care!
Looking at the DOF distance scale on the lens barrel of this 14mm lens, if you focus on a subject at at 4 feet using an aperture of f/8, the graph reads that your DOF range is about 2-5 feet. I just did a quick test in my office, and using those parameters, the subject matter at 8 feet is soft, but not exceptionally blurry.
Is there a true macro lens for the Fujifilm GFX series of cameras? The FUJIFILM GF 120mm f/4 Macro R LM OIS WR Lens features a maximum magnification of 1:2 and that just doesn't cut it for a "macro lens," especially at the price point for which it sells. Thanks for your advice, Dan!
Walter, I don't know. I'm pretty sure that the 120mm f/4 is the only closeup lens for the GFX, but Fujifilm has two dedicated extension tubes for the GF mount, which you can see here: bhpho.to/2OLBjeh I've used Fuji's X Series extension tubes on my Fujis with good results.
@@DanBaileyPhoto very impressive. AF is really really good. And grip is superb. Superb for professinal work. Unfortunately it’s not geht retro feeling 😅
Yes, the X-H2S doesn't quite have the same feel as the X-T series cameras, but it's an amazingly capable machine, and quite compact for how powerful it is!
I love the 16mm f/1.4 because I can get SO CLOSE to subjects, while still having a crazy-wide lens. Have you compared the two? I'm curious to see what you think.
Amarand, they’re very similar in design and quality. The 14 has a close focus of 7”, compared to the 16 at 5.9”. They’re both excellent lenses. I prefer the 14 for its noticeably lighter weight and smaller size.
The answer is probably yes, simply because of how light and small the 14 is. The 14 has very little to no distortion, but I haven't shot very much with the 16, so I can't compare. Have you noticed any distortion with the 16?
I also own both but I use xf14 more frequently because of its size and weight for hiking. I use xf16 for low light conditions. Xf14 and xf27 are great combination for hiking!!!
Hi Katherine - Yes, the 16 f/2.8 is a great lens. A little more compact than the 14. Maybe not quite as sharp edge to edge under critical view, but overall a very good lens and nice and small for travel. I really enjoy shooting with the little 16mm! What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
Bill, if I were going for compact, say a small lens for travel, then the 16mm f/2.8. If it were solely on image quality, or a lens for shooting night scenes, then the 14mm would be my choice. Hope that helps.
For landscapes & on the bike(mostly XC) stuff, which do you rec 14mm or 16mm f2.8? Both are similar price in the open market, which kind of surprised as I thought the 14mm would be priced closer to 16mm 1.4.
Alex, for cycling I would probably go with the 16mm f/2.8, simply because it' smaller and more compact than the 14mm f/2.8. I do love both lenses. The 14 is a killer lens, but find myself taking the 16 more often these day for that reason. That said, I've biked and hiked a ton with the 14 as well. It's still a very light weight lens.
Cool! I've ridden mountain bikes in California, but haven't taken my gravel bike there yet. In the spring of 2019, I did a CA trip and rode in LA, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz and a couple areas in the Bay Area. Need to come back with the new bike!
Yes, I would say it is definitely comparable. Keep in mind, the type of AF motor that's used in each lens varies with construction. Linear Motors (LM) are indeed fast, but they're typically used bigger and longer lenses, where the motor has to drive more and bigger pieces of glass when focusing, or when the design of the lens uses external zooming focus systems. Compact lenses that have smaller, lighter elements and internal focusing with less travel between close focus and infinity can be built with much smaller motors. The XF14mm uses a Micromotor, which is generally an older, more economical technology, but it can can work very well for lenses with small, lightweight construction. Of course, performance can vary between lenses, but I've used this particular lens when shooting action for many years, and I would say that it does focus and track very well. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I’d like to shoot action such as cycling with it for its wide and open aperture. I Currently using xt5. Thanks for replying Dan, love your work 🤙🏻
Thanks! Here's one of my favorite action shots of all time, made with the XF14mm on the X-T3: danbaileyphoto.com/blog/the-coolest-action-photo-ive-ever-shot/ So yea, the 14 f/2.8 is definitely capable for fast subjects, and with the improved AF of the X-T5, it will be even more capable. 💪
My first lens (still love it) purchased w my first fugi (xe1).Guess I am fixed: own 16/2.8, 23/2, 35/1.4, 50/2, 90/2 and will probably get 27/2.8 if I buy the xe4
Dan, seems to me that the lens has no distortion. Or were these images post processed to remove it? And another thing, is the 2 mm difference with the 16 mm f1.4 lens a big deal?
Edwin, you’re right, the 14 has almost no distortion. FYI, all of these photos are straight JPEGs with no processing. And the 16 1.4 is certainly a fantastic lens, but it is noticeably bigger and heavier than the 14. Those extra 2 stops aren’t free! 😆 For me, that’s the main reason I haven’t gotten the 16, moreso then the 2 extra mm.
The 14mm does sunstars really well, you just have to fine tune the position of the sun when you're hiding it behind something. When you get it right, it looks awesome. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I use the xt-4, mainly for filming hiking videos. I really like sunstars in my shots and not having them would be a deal breaker for me. I've seen mixed info on whether the 14mm produces sunstars so trying to sort that out. Currently using the 10-24 but looking for a lighter ultra wide lens with better low light. Also hoping the 14mm would be a step up in IQ but sunstars are a must!
The 14 is indeed an excellent, lightweight lens, and as I said, it does produce good sunstars. Here's one example: danbaileyphoto.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ROMANIA2015-01419.jpg
I just ordered a 1960s prime for my X-T1: an Olympus Pen Auto-T 100mm f/3.5, designed for half-frame film. No X-mount prime beyond 60mm is as short (81mm), as narrow (43mm filter), or as light (250 grams). A Pen-to-X-mount adapter is less than 1 cm thick. And it cost just $75 shipped from Japan, plus the $22 adapter.
Thanks for the excellent video, as usual. I have been enjoying using my 14mm Fuji lens for more than a year. It is excellent for architectural and landscape photography. One thing that you did not mention in your video is that the autofocus is silent (at least I don't hear it working). I didn't realize that activating the manual focus mode on the lens obviates the need to switch the camera to manual mode - thanks for the tip.
I just have this lens and the 56mm f1.2 portrait lens for my X-T30. Must admit, I pretty much only use the 14mm for tight spaces during photos at work. But I'd love to get better at using those two for street photography, even though I know something between them would be typical. The 14mm's focus clutch ring that clicks back and forth isn't so helpful for me, as I use back button focus and the ring overrides it - forcing me to be either full focus (via the shutter button) or full manual.
Hi Mike, thanks for your comment. I've found the 14mm and 50mm f/2 to be a great and incredibly lightweight combination for shooting a wide variety of subjects. If you wanted to add something in between, the 35 f/2 would be an excellent choice, that's my other favorite.
@@DanBaileyPhoto well yes.. Was making comparison between the 14 16 or 10 24... Found the 14 the cheapest one.. Unless if i get the 16 2.8 but wont make a big diffrent than the 18 55 lens wich i sold.. So wanna go wider
@@DanBaileyPhoto sorry about the laconic comment, but I was driving. you encouraged me to buy that X-S10 lens and I'm curious if it's as precise as it's going to be perfect for the vlog. Thank you for the great movie.
Haha! No worries!! I hope it works out for you. With Fuji, I've found that even the less expensive bodies and lenses perform quite well! What kind of vlog do you have?
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Having watched this earlier, I was so inspired I got the lens. Loving it. Back to watch this video for the inspiring images that Dan showcases.
That's awesome! The 14 is definitely a fun and versatile lens. Which X Series camera are you using and what kinds of subjects do you like to photograph?
Old guy here.... can't Express how much I love the focus clutch system for manual focusing. I came up on manual focus Nikons and Leicas and know how and when zone and hyper focusing can be the best way to go. A wide angle screams for deep focus and the DOF scale and clearly marked distances make this old school way of working easy.
Besides the 14mm, Fujifilm's 16mm and 23mm f/1.4 lenses have the clutch system and once you start consistently getting perfect zones and deep hyper focus shots with no guess work, it's hard to lose that capability with lenses that dont have this option.
Enjoyed your video.
Albert, thanks for your comment. I also love the DOF scale on the Fuji "clutch" lenses. It's just one more tool that can help you use the skills and experience with regards to DOF and hyperfocal distance. I don't shoot that way all the time, but for certain scenes, it can really come in handy! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I bought an X-T2 and 23mm Fujicron as an experiment. My satisfaction was such that I now have the same setup (I never get rid of anything) and an X-E3, X-Pro2, X-E2s and two X-T3 bodies. I also have redundant 16mm, 23mm and 35mm f/1.4 and f/2 (f/2.8 for the 16mm) sets, plus 18mm and 50mm f/2 lenses and the 60mm f/2.4 macro.
Subjects today have been reduced to local street and city/landscape stuff because of the last two years of curtailed travel and social distancing.
Sounds like you've got a very complete setup, Albert! And yes, opportunities have been lifted during the past couple of years, although that does force us to exercise some different creative ideas when looking for subject matter. Hopefully things will start to change soon. Until then, keep having fun with your Fuji gear.
I totally agree with you. The 14 mm lens is my absolute favorite (and also oldest fuji lens) for landscape. Great review with great pictures, i really like your work.
Thanks, Patrik. 👍 Indeed, the 14 2.8 is a winner for sure!! I'm never sorry that I filled valuable camera bag space with that lens, and it never lets me down. Which Fuji do you use and what kinds of landscapes do you like to photograph?
One of the first Fujinon lenses I bought is the 18mm F2. It's loud, but nicely compact and excellent for street and landscape photography. Still, I'm tempted to get me this 14mm.This lens doesn't distort, which is pretty amazing.
I have that tiny little original 18mm f/2 as well, but this 14 really shines with its extra width and excellent image quality. Which camera(s) would you use it with?
@@DanBaileyPhoto For street photography I use my trusted X-A1 because it's so small. I think I'm going to rent the 14mm at some to see if it fits my needs.
There's also the brand new 8mm f/3.5 lens. That's another ultra wide lens with very little distortion. It might be worth checking out: bhpho.to/43hfrIJ
Like you, I owner mine 14mm f2.8 for 9 years, and man, what a great decision I made, this beauty stays always in my bag, rather I go for a paid job, or if I go hiking, It's one of my favorites lenses, never let me down, even as you said in your video, in the rain and ice! The image quality and the form factor are just perfect, so well balanced! I have zoom lens too but just for work only,! This joy is a great companion and suits so well for a nice range of fixed lenses with my other two, the 23mm f2 and the 56mm f1.2. The only complaint that I have, is the diaphragm rig, it's a little lose for my taste but other than that its just a unique angle of view, and not so common as the 16mm (24mm in 35mm terms), and this only with no virtual distortion, makes this joy a winner! Lovely video man, thanks for sharing.
Thanks for your comment! Yes, the 14 really is great lens, and as you said, the only downside is the rather loose aperture ring. Not a big deal, especially if that's the only thing that's not perfect. Glad you liked this video. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
Excellent review with amazing example images ❤👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻 Thank you Dan for sharing your valuable experience 🍫🙏🏻😊
My pleasure! Glad you enjoyed this video! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
The 14mm lens is my first and only Fuji lens so far and I am definitely very satisfied with it. Thanks for giving me some new ideas on how to use it.
You're welcome. That 14 really is a great lens!
Cheers for that Dan, I will purchase one tomorrow morning UK, used in amazing condition.
Awesome!! I'm sure you'll have a lot of fun with that lens! Cheers!
Just got one second hand £313 , fabulous condition … very helpful vid Dan cheers . Look forward to using it !
Awesome. You're going to love the 14mm, it's a fantastic lens. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto Hi Dan , used the 14 for 2 days now . Did some landscape shots and I love the Close focussing too ! Looks like a great lens so far
finally another great video from our friend Dan !!!!
Wheeee!! Yes, I finally pulled out the green screen and shot another video! 😀 I hope to have more videos in the upcoming weeks.
@@DanBaileyPhoto Yeah
Any specific topics you'd like to see me cover?
@@DanBaileyPhoto What do you think to try old cameras?
I bought the 14mm to go with the kit lens in my first Fuji, the Sexy-1 (X-E1). I love the lens, well except for the loose aperture ring, which I fixed with a bit of gaff tape. Shooting cyclocross races it is always one one of my bodies.
Thanks for your comment. Yea, with the later lenses, Fuji definitely made the f/stop rings a little tighter. And I would agree, it's a great lens for shooting CX, some of my all time favorite cyclocross photos were shot with the 14. Where do you like to shoot CX races?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I’m in west Michigan, I shoot the Kisscross series and a couple others in Michigan if I get the chance.
Cool. Shooting cyclocross is so much fun!!
Shooting mountain bike cross country races with the 23mm f/2 or 35mm f/2. Criterium’s on the inside of corners with the 14mm or if I’m using my Canon the 17-40. I like shooting close.
Those kinds of mid range focal lengths, like the 35, and to some extent, the 23, are not what would normally be considered good "action lenses," but if you know how to use them, you can definitely get some good results! 👍
Dan, this really IS a fabulous lens judging by the photos you showed, but I venture to say that this same lens would not produce similar results in most hands. You are a gifted photographer, and you can fully capitalize on what a lens like this can do. Most of us have more limited abilities; for instance, I really don't think that this lens would do a great deal more for me than I'm able to get with my 10-24 wide-angle zoom. Ah, but one can dream...
Hey Daniel, thanks so much for your comment. If you've already got the 10-24 and you're happy with it, then probably not need to switch to the 14. That's the thing we all run into with photography... and everything else in life. There are always so many choices, and at some point, you're going to start duplicating what you already have, and that's not a very productive approach.
I run into this myself with music gear. "I need this new pedal," even though I might already have something similar from another brand. Then you're just taking up space and complicating your life. It's all about finding and narrowing down what works for you. Anyway, hope you're doing well and having a good winter. Cheers!
I also love wide-angle lenses. My widest for my full-frame camera is a 14mm f/2.8 Nikkor.
My widest for my APS-C is a 12mm f/2.8 auto focus Zeiss and a 12mm f/2 manual focus Rokinon. On my APS-C cameras, I prefer the 12mm focal length to the 14mm focal length because the 12mm focal length gives a 90-degree horizontal angle-of-view. The14mm gives a 90-degree diagonal angle-of-view. It is much easier for me to visualize a 90-degree horizontal angle-of-view as compared to a 90-degree diagonal angle-of-view.
Thanks for your comment. Interesting to note. I've always been a fan of very wide angle lenses. For my Nikons, I had a Tokina 17mm that I loved. Also had the Nikon 14mm, but didn't use that nearly as often. Mostly because it was a much larger, heavier lens. I'm especially interested in the new Fujifilm 8mm, which is quite wide, but also very small and compact. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
@@DanBaileyPhoto
Over the decades, I shot photojournalism, documentary, macro, scientific/medical, aerial, portraits, still life, landscapes, wildlife, architecture, astronomy, sports, vacation/travel, weddings and other social events. I have a Nikonos underwater camera that I used for shooting in hostile weather, but I never used it for underwater photography.
A little bit of everything, then! 😀
Dan, I appreciate you sharing your experience!
As for myself I have put buying Fujinon prime lenses on hold for the time being, as many of the new autofocus third party lenses that are coming out now look extremely promising, at much lower price points and with up to date focusing technology.
Karsten, thanks for your comment. Yes, lens technology has come a long way, and there are a number of third party options that look promising. Last week on my blog, I wrote about 7 Artisans lenses for Fuji, after trying out three of them. danbaileyphoto.com/blog/a-look-at-7-artisans-lenses-for-fuji/
Depending on the lens, you may not always get AF or full communication with the camera body, and in some cases, the same quality of glass, but that's not to say you can't have a lot of fun and make some great looking photos with non-brand name lenses. When I was a Nikon shooter, one of my favorite lenses was the Tokina ATX 17mm f/3.5. It was in regular, heavy rotation with my Nikon glass and I sold lots of photos that were shot with that lens.
Hi Dan. Your videos never fail to engage my interest. I just got this lens and really excited to take pictures with it. But a little apprehensive about how it will hold up in the places I work in - hot, humid and miserably wet during d monsoon season. Any advice?
Thanks, Lincoln. Really appreciate the feedback. Congratulations on your new 14mm!! Such a great lens. I think you’ll find that even though it’s not weather sealed, it’s still pretty tough. Just be sensible about how you use it and protect it as best you can from getting too wet. The Fuji lenses do hold up well, and I’ve abused my 14mm quite a bit over the years. I’m really wet conditions, the bigger issue is keeping water off the front of the lens so you can actually shoot photos! 😂
@@DanBaileyPhoto many thanks for the advice. Looking forward to taking interesting pictures with it. May your channel subscriptions grow and grow.
Thanks so much!!! 👍😀
14/2.8, 27/2.8 and 60/2.4 all you need in optimum PQ. That and the 6x6 Hasselblad Biogon 38/4.5 903 SWC:-).
All you need is.... Some free time and really good light! 🤣
@@DanBaileyPhoto good one :)
Thanks!!
Enjoyed the video Dan. Love the wide angle lenses for Landscape and create a story. Have a question regarding lenses. I learned shooting with only 1 fixed lens but I would like to know your thoughts regarding next lens for my bag. I am looking to acquire another lens prior to another excursion to Switzerland. I am not sure whether to go with a zoom or fixed. I understand the flexibility advantages of zoom but are they acceptable as an alternative in terms of quality to 1- additional lens for my trip and long term use. What lens would suggest I acquire. Presently shoot with the 23 f2. Thank you Dan
Hi Mike, thanks for your comment. Regarding fixed vs. zoom lenses, I'd say it comes down to preference. I've always enjoyed the form factor and simplicity of prime lenses in the short to middle range, and zooms on the longer telephoto range. With today's lenses, I'd say that the good ones have comparable quality to similar focal length fixed lenses, so again it comes down to the kind of lens that you want to carry and use.
For a travel lens that might work well for travel and compliment the 23mm f/2, there are certainly a few choices out there, but for your second lens, I might suggest a compact and fast short telephoto, like the 50mm f/2, which appears to be in stock at most places right now. With that, you'd have your wide and short telephoto range covered, with just two very tiny lenses. What do you think of that?
Totally agree with your comments on this beautiful lens, I’ve only had mine for a year now because I was after a wide angle of view for infrared photography as I recently had my X-T1 converted. Unfortunately the 10-24 does not work, another lens I really enjoy using. The 14mm 2.8 was perfect for infrared and gives fantastic results and has become my most used lens even on my X-T3. I,m hoping Fujifilm will compliment it soon with a 10 or 12mm in the same design again hopefully this would also work well for infrared....
Noel, thanks for your comment. I never thought about the IR aspect with regard to different lenses. Why is it that the 10-24 doesn't work for infrared photography?
@@DanBaileyPhoto unfortunately with a lot of lenses mostly zooms you get a hot spot at the centre of your image. This is because of how infrared light works and how a lens is constructed. It can be pretty severe on some and only mild in others. The 14mm is the only wide angle that works in the Fuji line up and boy does it work well. The 10-24 is effected quit badly with a hot spot that makes your Images pretty unusable. It’s the same unfortunately with the 16mm.
Noel, very interesting. I had no idea that this was a factor with IR photography, and good to know that the 14 works in this manner. I just learned something new!
Love the lens too. Great shots!! How often do you use it with a polarizer?
Hi Peter, thanks for the comment. Not very often. I used one a lot back when I shot Kodachrome, but I never liked what the polarizer did to the blues in Velvia film, and now with the Velvia film simulations. Of course, the polarizer can help cut reflections and make the colors really pop if you're shooting things like wet leaves, so those are times when it does make a sense to pull it out. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
I've got the 16 f/1.4. A great lens that I've never warmed to. Can't decide if it's because it's too close to my 23 f/2, not wide enough, or I just don't know how to shoot a wide lens. Been considering the 14 f/2.8, or just junking the whole kit. I've got an X-Pro-2 and I hate it. Fiddly ISO/Shutter Speed dial, tiny EVF, no IBIS, crap battery life... Shot with an X-T4. Too small for my hands, hated the LCD was not a true flip screen, and couldn't use the EVF without smashing my nose into the LCD. I love Fuji glass, but I'm at a real crossroads with the brand because I can't find a body I like. Common wisdom is to buy into a line for the glass, but I've done that and I'm not happy. Thoughts?
Tom, sorry to hear that you're having a hard time finding a suitable Fuji body, because you're right, the glass is very good. I've always felt the same way with the 23, it's a great lens, but not quite wide enough for me. To me, the 14 perfectly fits in the bounds of what a wide angle should be. And it's light, fast, and quite a bit more compact than the 16.
@@DanBaileyPhoto It's frustrating because since I hate the X-Pro-2 and can't find a body I like, I don't shoot much anymore. I want to get outdoors and into the Sierra's but my gear is not inspiring me. Selling and starting over seems likely, but the only line I'm attracted to is Canon R. But the money is too much and it gets me right back into a big heavy bag again. To be honest I'm just about ready to give up on photography. Too much money with too many compromises, and no results to show for it.
Again, I'm sorry to hear that. It sounds like you have big hands. The X-T4 seems like it would be the best option, but I can understand your dislike of the flippy screen. It looks like there are still X-H1 bodies available. And the X-S1 is small, but it has a slightly different form factor than the X-T4. Nothing will ever be perfect, but I wouldn't let this make you give up photography. Humans have an incredible ability to adapt.
@@tomscott4438 The X-H2 is coming this year. That might be the Fuji body you're looking for.
@@DianneArnold, Fuji never said the H2 is coming out this year, matter of fact they said they will release the H2 when they feel there’s technological advancements and if they haven’t found those worthy advancements in February 2021 there will be no H2 in 2021.
excellent video!
Thank you very much for your comment! Glad you liked it! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
I have this lens but considering buying lowa 9mm because this is not wide enough.
Thanks for your comment. Yes, the 14mm isn't the widest lens available, so if you like to go wide, there are definitely options out there. What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
The 14 mm is one of those Fuji lenses ( like the 35 1.4 and the 56 1.2) that very often deliver pure magic.
It is indeed, Eric!! Definitely one of the real gems in the line. What do you like to shoot with it?
@@DanBaileyPhoto for years the 23 1.4 has been my to go lens for especially street photography. Than I wanted to play with a wider angle and bought the 14mm 2,8.
This lens does a great job in old cities with canals like Utrecht where I live and Amsterdam; it adds even more character to the city. I just recently discovered the quality of the 35 1.4.
When I go to Amsterdam now I leave the heavy 23 1.4 at home and go light with the 14 and the 35. Greetings from Holland
Eric, I have the 23 1.4 too, it's an amazing lens. I don't use it very often, but every time I pull it out, I'm so impressed. I generally prefer wider angle focus lengths, which is why I love the 14mm, but depending on the subject, sometimes the tighter views of the 23 and 35 are just what's needed.
Great informative video! The 14 is 1st on my wish list. Dan, do you have any thoughts on the 16 f2.8 or the 28 f2? Thanks, keep up the good work.
Thanks, John. I do like the 16 f/2.8, it's weather sealed and a little bit more compact than the 14mm. Gives you that classic 24mm angle of view. You can't go wrong with that lens. RE: 28mm, I'm assuming you mean the 23mm f/2. I don't have that lens, but all of the little WR primes are great choices. Small, light, relatively inexpensive and loads of fun! What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto hi Dan thanks for your response. I meant 18mm not 28mm. Slip of the thumb. I have the 23 and the 35 f2’s and feel they are both great. I enjoy street, documentary and cityscape photography. My Fuji bodies are the X-T30 and the X-E2.
Got it. I have the 18 f/2, and while it's also a fun lens, I'd say that between the 16 and 18, I prefer the 16mm f/2.8. It's a little bit wider and weather sealed. And it has a newer technology, faster AF motor. The motor on the 18 is a little slow. Between the 14mm and 18mm, though, that's an easy choice. 14 all the way.
@@DanBaileyPhoto thanks for your input and advice.Happy Holidays.
Thanks, John. Happy holidays to you as well!
Sounds like a great lens, but it's always the same problem: so many great things, so little cash. I do have the XF 10-24 (the original, not the revised edition) and it addresses my wide-angle needs perfectly for just about the same price and more versatility. Do I want to spend an extra $900 to save some weight? Not really. I might consider a third-party lens just to travel right in certain situations; the Rokinon is less than half price. Sure, it's manual focus, but for a wide angle it's not really an issue. In a way, it's interesting how demanding we have become. These days, people say things like, "No IBIS, no deal", and to me who grew up with film-based cameras that were manual-everything, this sounds just strange. Anyway, I did enjoy your video (I always like them). Keep up the good work!
Daniel, thanks for your insight. You're absolutely right. It the world of reality, there would be no possible way we could buy everything and own every single piece of gear. You have to find the right piece(s) of gear for you, that fit with your style and intended creative ideas. It's all a matter of weighing the benefits against your wallet and the available space in your house, and considering how much you NEED that partial piece of gear, or if you already have something suitable that helps you fulfill your creative urges in a suitable way.
I see the same parallels with music. It's all the same. Should I buy that new guitar/amp/pedal? It sure is shiny, and it would probably make me play better... but maybe I already have the gear that lets me play exactly the way I want. I think that we're always chasing something, but in the end, we discover that we already had it right in front of us.
Of course, for those people who are indeed in the market for a Fuji wide angle lens, this 14 2.8 is a pretty awesome lens! 😀 Keep up the good work, Daniel and take care!
I love this lens 14mm f/ 2.8
Luciano, what do you like to shoot with it?
@@DanBaileyPhoto everything sono fotoamatore ciao .
I'd be interested at the depth of field at f8 if the subject is 4 feet away.
Looking at the DOF distance scale on the lens barrel of this 14mm lens, if you focus on a subject at at 4 feet using an aperture of f/8, the graph reads that your DOF range is about 2-5 feet. I just did a quick test in my office, and using those parameters, the subject matter at 8 feet is soft, but not exceptionally blurry.
Is there a true macro lens for the Fujifilm GFX series of cameras? The FUJIFILM GF 120mm f/4 Macro R LM OIS WR Lens features a maximum magnification of 1:2 and that just doesn't cut it for a "macro lens," especially at the price point for which it sells. Thanks for your advice, Dan!
Walter, I don't know. I'm pretty sure that the 120mm f/4 is the only closeup lens for the GFX, but Fujifilm has two dedicated extension tubes for the GF mount, which you can see here: bhpho.to/2OLBjeh I've used Fuji's X Series extension tubes on my Fujis with good results.
@@DanBaileyPhoto Thanks! What about third party lenses?
Walter, it looks like Viltrox also makes compatible GF mount extension tubes: bhpho.to/3f8yUFj
Thank you so much for that video
You are so welcome! Glad you enjoyed this! Are you currently a Fuji shooter?
@@DanBaileyPhoto yes fully Fuji.
Xt4. Xh2s. X100v and some lenses 😅
Cool. How are you liking the new X-H2S?
@@DanBaileyPhoto very impressive. AF is really really good. And grip is superb. Superb for professinal work. Unfortunately it’s not geht retro feeling 😅
Yes, the X-H2S doesn't quite have the same feel as the X-T series cameras, but it's an amazingly capable machine, and quite compact for how powerful it is!
I love the 16mm f/1.4 because I can get SO CLOSE to subjects, while still having a crazy-wide lens. Have you compared the two? I'm curious to see what you think.
Amarand, they’re very similar in design and quality. The 14 has a close focus of 7”, compared to the 16 at 5.9”. They’re both excellent lenses. I prefer the 14 for its noticeably lighter weight and smaller size.
@@DanBaileyPhoto If you already owned the 16, would you also have the 14 in your kit? Sounds like it has less distortion?
The answer is probably yes, simply because of how light and small the 14 is. The 14 has very little to no distortion, but I haven't shot very much with the 16, so I can't compare. Have you noticed any distortion with the 16?
I also own both but I use xf14 more frequently because of its size and weight for hiking. I use xf16 for low light conditions.
Xf14 and xf27 are great combination for hiking!!!
Hi Dan have you tried the 16mm-f2.8 wr
Hi Katherine - Yes, the 16 f/2.8 is a great lens. A little more compact than the 14. Maybe not quite as sharp edge to edge under critical view, but overall a very good lens and nice and small for travel. I really enjoy shooting with the little 16mm! What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
If you had neither, would you suggest the 14mm over the 16mm 2.8? I'm in the situation of trying to decide.
Bill, if I were going for compact, say a small lens for travel, then the 16mm f/2.8. If it were solely on image quality, or a lens for shooting night scenes, then the 14mm would be my choice. Hope that helps.
@@DanBaileyPhoto it sure does. I'm a bit torn so I appreciate the insight!
They're both great lenses. Let me know if you have any more questions.
For landscapes & on the bike(mostly XC) stuff, which do you rec 14mm or 16mm f2.8? Both are similar price in the open market, which kind of surprised as I thought the 14mm would be priced closer to 16mm 1.4.
Alex, for cycling I would probably go with the 16mm f/2.8, simply because it' smaller and more compact than the 14mm f/2.8. I do love both lenses. The 14 is a killer lens, but find myself taking the 16 more often these day for that reason. That said, I've biked and hiked a ton with the 14 as well. It's still a very light weight lens.
@@DanBaileyPhoto thank you.
You're welcome, Alex!! What kind of bike(s) do you ride?
@@DanBaileyPhoto gravel/atb & trail in California
Cool! I've ridden mountain bikes in California, but haven't taken my gravel bike there yet. In the spring of 2019, I did a CA trip and rode in LA, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz and a couple areas in the Bay Area. Need to come back with the new bike!
4:15 Is it really that cumbersome to toggle the switch between Single to Manual focus on the front of the body as you make it seem?! I think not.
Haha! You’re totally right. I was being funny. As you know, it’s just a simple, intuitive flip that you can do by feel.
Is the af comparable with some LM series?
Yes, I would say it is definitely comparable. Keep in mind, the type of AF motor that's used in each lens varies with construction. Linear Motors (LM) are indeed fast, but they're typically used bigger and longer lenses, where the motor has to drive more and bigger pieces of glass when focusing, or when the design of the lens uses external zooming focus systems.
Compact lenses that have smaller, lighter elements and internal focusing with less travel between close focus and infinity can be built with much smaller motors. The XF14mm uses a Micromotor, which is generally an older, more economical technology, but it can can work very well for lenses with small, lightweight construction. Of course, performance can vary between lenses, but I've used this particular lens when shooting action for many years, and I would say that it does focus and track very well.
What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I’d like to shoot action such as cycling with it for its wide and open aperture. I Currently using xt5.
Thanks for replying Dan, love your work 🤙🏻
Thanks! Here's one of my favorite action shots of all time, made with the XF14mm on the X-T3: danbaileyphoto.com/blog/the-coolest-action-photo-ive-ever-shot/
So yea, the 14 f/2.8 is definitely capable for fast subjects, and with the improved AF of the X-T5, it will be even more capable. 💪
My first lens (still love it) purchased w my first fugi (xe1).Guess I am fixed: own 16/2.8, 23/2, 35/1.4, 50/2, 90/2 and will probably get 27/2.8 if I buy the xe4
Martin, thanks for the comment! Sounds like you've got an awesome setup with all of those fast primes! 👍
Dan, seems to me that the lens has no distortion. Or were these images post processed to remove it? And another thing, is the 2 mm difference with the 16 mm f1.4 lens a big deal?
Edwin, you’re right, the 14 has almost no distortion. FYI, all of these photos are straight JPEGs with no processing.
And the 16 1.4 is certainly a fantastic lens, but it is noticeably bigger and heavier than the 14. Those extra 2 stops aren’t free! 😆 For me, that’s the main reason I haven’t gotten the 16, moreso then the 2 extra mm.
@@DanBaileyPhoto What's the minimal focusing distance on the 14?
Minimum focusing distance on the 14 is 7.09 inches (18cm).
@@DanBaileyPhoto thanks. That's fantastic, no distortion at a relatively wide angle lens. Thanks for sharing.
You’re welcome. Yes, it’s a testament to the excellent design of the Fuji glass.
How are the sunstars / starbursts on this lens?
The 14mm does sunstars really well, you just have to fine tune the position of the sun when you're hiding it behind something. When you get it right, it looks awesome. What Fuji do you use and what do you like to photograph?
@@DanBaileyPhoto I use the xt-4, mainly for filming hiking videos. I really like sunstars in my shots and not having them would be a deal breaker for me. I've seen mixed info on whether the 14mm produces sunstars so trying to sort that out. Currently using the 10-24 but looking for a lighter ultra wide lens with better low light. Also hoping the 14mm would be a step up in IQ but sunstars are a must!
The 14 is indeed an excellent, lightweight lens, and as I said, it does produce good sunstars. Here's one example: danbaileyphoto.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ROMANIA2015-01419.jpg
@@DanBaileyPhoto thanks! Really appreciate the insight 👍
My pleasure. 👍
I bought some old lenses and adapters. Feels like a mistake. Whats the point?
Not sure. What lenses and adapters did you buy, and why are you feeling like it wasn't the right choice?
I just ordered a 1960s prime for my X-T1: an Olympus Pen Auto-T 100mm f/3.5, designed for half-frame film. No X-mount prime beyond 60mm is as short (81mm), as narrow (43mm filter), or as light (250 grams). A Pen-to-X-mount adapter is less than 1 cm thick. And it cost just $75 shipped from Japan, plus the $22 adapter.
Thanks for the excellent video, as usual. I have been enjoying using my 14mm Fuji lens for more than a year. It is excellent for architectural and landscape photography. One thing that you did not mention in your video is that the autofocus is silent (at least I don't hear it working). I didn't realize that activating the manual focus mode on the lens obviates the need to switch the camera to manual mode - thanks for the tip.
Thanks, Steve. Yes, the 14 has incredibly quiet autofocus! It‘s such a useful lens for so many styles of photography.
I just have this lens and the 56mm f1.2 portrait lens for my X-T30. Must admit, I pretty much only use the 14mm for tight spaces during photos at work. But I'd love to get better at using those two for street photography, even though I know something between them would be typical. The 14mm's focus clutch ring that clicks back and forth isn't so helpful for me, as I use back button focus and the ring overrides it - forcing me to be either full focus (via the shutter button) or full manual.
Hi Mike, thanks for your comment. I've found the 14mm and 50mm f/2 to be a great and incredibly lightweight combination for shooting a wide variety of subjects. If you wanted to add something in between, the 35 f/2 would be an excellent choice, that's my other favorite.
Helpfull ❤️
Thanks for the comment! Glad to year! Are you interested in getting this lens?
@@DanBaileyPhoto well yes.. Was making comparison between the 14 16 or 10 24... Found the 14 the cheapest one.. Unless if i get the 16 2.8 but wont make a big diffrent than the 18 55 lens wich i sold.. So wanna go wider
Dikran, I think you'll find that the extra width of the 14 is pretty sweet!! What kinds of subjects do you like to shoot?
👍
😀
@@DanBaileyPhoto sorry about the laconic comment, but I was driving. you encouraged me to buy that X-S10 lens and I'm curious if it's as precise as it's going to be perfect for the vlog. Thank you for the great movie.
Haha! No worries!! I hope it works out for you. With Fuji, I've found that even the less expensive bodies and lenses perform quite well! What kind of vlog do you have?
@@DanBaileyPhoto i'm going to do a blog of journey and sport and dance and cyclical festivals from all over the world.
That sounds really cool!! Good luck with that project!
53rd.
Huh...?