Great Video! Best one I've seen! No lying, no BS, no guaranteeing ways to win with ridiculous patterns, no marketing books or videos, etc. Just the honest truth
Great video. Everything is true and accurate, and it should be added why Martingale never pays off over time: The casinos protect themselves against Martingale by having table limits. That is really the only reason for table limits, considering that the casinos love for you to bet as big as you want to. At most tables, even someone with an unlimited bankroll and using Martingale would have to stop doubling their bet after only about 8 losses. The first string of 8 losses in a row, and the Martingale jig is up. The only way to win at roulette is to actually be able to predict ahead of time where the ball will land, with a degree of accuracy better than 5.26%. If you could predict a half side of the wheel, or even a section of up to 34 slots (leaving out only a 4-number section), a player could win, but the 34-area section would have to be 100% accurate to win in the long run.
Best bet to win at Roulette is start with as large a bankroll as possible and play a few rounds of Martingale, then walk away with your winnings and never come back.
The odds are against you and the odds dont change. You turn bets in your favor by betting on probabilities and fluctuations in amount bet. Bet low until its probable you can win and then increase your bet. You can also hedge your bet by placing a second small bet on the green to turn those into a win. This is what makes it fun. It's a challenge and you use strategy to win. It's like a game of chess.
Since you are essentially paying for variance, the best bet by far is betting on a single number. The rake is the same as a red or black bet, but you get more variance for free.
Excellent Video clip! Apologies for butting in, I would love your initial thoughts. Have you ever tried - Mahorrla Earning Gamble Method (erm, check it on google should be there)? It is a great exclusive guide for making money with a proven roulette system without the normal expense. Ive heard some incredible things about it and my work colleague finally got cool results with it.
Excellent video content! Excuse me for the intrusion, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you heard about - Mahorrla Earning Gamble Method (probably on Google)? It is a smashing one off product for making money with a proven roulette system without the normal expense. Ive heard some great things about it and my friend after many years got excellent success with it.
in european roulette the house edge is 2.70 on ALL bets..btw my fav game is call bets..specifically 1,9,6 and 2 with their two neighbours. because you cover all the orphans, 4 numbers from the small series (33,16,27,13) and 6 numbers from the big series (25,2,21,4,22,18).. ...with this you cover 18 numbers which is roughly half of the wheel...16 numbers bring you 75 euros ( if you start with 100 eur) and the numbers 14 and 17 bring you 350 eur....i know its a long shot but what the hell...its fun as long as you play with money you CAN afford to lose :)
Play on one to one odds. Place the minimum bet. When loose, double it plus your initial bet. Loose. Double it plus your initial bet. Martingale + initial bet. Do the math. You win on every single spin the minimum bet regardless of what comes out, unless 0 screws it. 1.10 - 2.30 - 3.70 - 4.150 - 5.310 5 spins. Spent 570. 5th spin pays you 310 plus your 310 back 620 minus 570 equals 50 in 5 spins. Beware of the table limits. Martingale is a waste of time for nothing. Martingale + your initial bet wins. Good luck.
This is a pretty good video. However there are smarter ways to gamble on the roulette table. The bets you described are commonly used by new players. I do use a variation of the Martingale system and it works well. I double down (sometimes triple down) on every loss with $1-5 and when it happens. I always add a bet to the green zero and include any losses there within my red/black bet. I should also mention the Non-American version only has one zero and it pays 35/1. With that said, once my bets are getting high I also place $5 or $10 on zero green leaving me with a 50% chance to win red/black or 1% chance to hit green.The real killer is the table max bet. That's the weakness of the Martingale. But, do a video on the odds of losing 10 times in a row...please because it's very rare. Seven losses is rare and at seven losses doubling down from $1 is only a $64 bet with a total loss of about $130. There are times when I do lose that many times but seriously I win way more and at the end of the day I always hit on the green once or twice besides winning half my bets. I actually use this with $1 online and I haven't lost big yet. I've only won when I am done for the day but as you pointed out you're not winning very much very fast. I still make close to $100 dollars when I do play using roughly a hour or two of my time. Just make sure you;re using a trust worthy site. You can google them because there are plenty of people using them and judging them.
If you play virtual roulette, only high/low or red/black and martingale often gets a lot. It's ultimately less than 50% odds, but for gambling it's not bad.
Could you please break down for me the math of betting on the black and at the same time the first column (the one with most red numbers). Thanks in advance!
i won $500 betting on #26 and around the zero... i seen the wheel was basis so i jumped on it while it landed on around the zero 3-4 times in a row... then my bets went down when it jumped to the opposite side of the wheel... i noticed alot of high numbers were coming 4-5 times in a row so i also jumped on betting in the 3rd 12's, placing 5-10 on each number in the 3rd 12's and 2-3 chips in the %38 1st 12's... the 2nd 12's were cold and were at a low %16... while the 3rd 12's was like %48.....
Best way I've looked at losing that 5.3 cents is the same way as a business pays taxes. Just because they have to give a cut to the house doesn't mean the business won't be successful. The house odds on European is 2.7% but I've never met a gambler that has lost only 2.7% of their bankroll.
This is the 1st UA-cam commit I've ever left....The passion you have for this in addition to the knowledge you drop, hats off to you man, thank you, my life is better having had watched this....Hey....Cyber High 5, here's to you bro!! {[(Side note)]} With your book smarts & my street smarts combined with our casino experience per say & the passion, scorpio bro? IDk I think the girls might be right, anyway...Squirrel....I encourage you to take intrest in what I have to offer. IDK how else to say this but take a chance, I'm not some random idiot, I have the capital, it's already up and running, I'm a solo outfit, all u would do is expand the margins and take a percentage....I really hope I here from you...Carry out good sir & again, thank you!!
problem with math is it does not address patterns and patterns are much better indicators that an outcome is likely or not likely than merely working out the house edge!
Of course the house has the advantage but it is not the point. That is why they are in business. But it doesnt mean you cannot escape the disadvantage. I try my strategies and i am always in profit however small.
u know whats really messed up, when i play online roulette with real money at a online casino and i do the double down thing at the end of the video u get into some serious money like u said. even if u start from $2 or $5. Also the crazy thing is that colours/oddeven/highlow they run sometimes ive had up to 13 times. even at $2 hands that equates to 32,768 at 13 times doubling down just to be up $2 with all that debit. u win some u lose some.
Hi mate, i'm trying to find the expected values for a roulette wheel in this game i'm making a video about but i'm not 100% sure if my math is correct. Could I possibly contact you for help with this?
So this is my question; I have come up with a strategy where I can actually win positive net 24/38 times on a $150 bet (due to 21 different ways to hit). This strategy actually “wins” 33/38 times, but doesn’t net money 9/33. I used your formula, and sure enough, the -5.3 cents shows up. What I don’t understand is that I have more of a probability to win net money. In fact, only 5/38 do I actually lose all 150. Why is this? Is this due to the payouts? Looking through my notes, I only have 1/38 chance of netting $150 ($300 total winning). The next best payout is $141, with a 2/38 odds. As you can never win every bet in roulette, my approach was to limit the losses and maximize how many times I won. Mathematically it appears like there is no way to come on top?
Well you must vary the amount of units that you bet, otherwise the odds are against you and take away your money over time. If you have enough money to go for rows or even go for singles and always be able to double the amount of your units in play, you should actually win more than you lose in total.
Muy cierto. Triste de saberlo, la realidad de las cosas. Evidentemente los casinos, si lo tienen es porque es negocio conveniente, sino no lo tendrían. Sólo por diversión dice. No como una forma real y viable hacer dinero. Matemáticamente comprobado, ya no hay duda.
It depends on your bet. You just have to take the inverse of the probability of winning and substract 1. For example if you are always betting for columns and you are playing with the double zeros roulette then the probability of winning this bet is 12/38. The inverse is 38/12 ~= 3.17 and substract 1 ---> 2.17. This is, you would have to double your bets 2.17 times in average (you would have to double it 2 times more often than 3). Explanation: Let X be the random variable "times you play before you win". Then X has a geometric distribution with parameter p (the probability of winning a bet). If you are always betting the same kind of bet (for example, you are always betting columns) the probability of having to play k times before you win is P(X=k) = p*(1-p)^(k-1). The expected value of any geometric distribution is 1/p so in average you would have to play 1/p times, which is equivalent to doubling the bet 1/p - 1 bets. Note: This doesn't apply if you change your type of bet, for example, from columns to row. However if you are betting columns, you could change the number of column and this will still hold, because the probability of winning is the same for all 3.
Isn't there something off on your calculation for a corner bet? You show 4/38 but there are only 36 numbers involved in corners, and there are only 22 corners to bet.
The james bond was developed for a wheel with one zero, not two. also, you seem to be missing that you keep your winning bet. For example, you hit the second 18 and win 140 and lose the 60, you now have 280. Your bet plus the winnings. Your numbers are right as for probability but you seem to be doing the math for 35 for 1, not to 1. But I do agree with you, all games are losing bets in the casinos.
Cheers for the Video clip! Sorry for butting in, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you considered - Mahorrla Earning Gamble Method (do a google search)? It is a great exclusive product for making money with a proven roulette system without the normal expense. Ive heard some interesting things about it and my cousin finally got astronomical results with it.
What happens if I use an increased bet? for example: I'll bet 9 units the neighbors of 0 ( 17 numbers out of 37, european roulette, one 0) 14 numbers pays 8/1 3 numbers pays 11/1 ( 0, 2, 3) if I lose, I bet the next spin 18 units. Let's say I use the Fibonacci Sequence (1, 2, 3, 5, 8...) if I hit the first 3 spins I always return to first (9 units). If I hit after 3-th spin, I get back 2 bets and go from there! Probability to hit a number is 17/37=46% average My question is: EV is positive or negativ in long-term?
right that would work, highest holding record in history 62 blacks or reds in a row , bankrolled enough to reach 620 times for safety that would never happen not even in a trillion years in a honest roulette game.
excellent video! i was crunching some numbers on roulette myself and found it's a loser, there's no way around it. i was trying to see if it was better to play 10, 11, 12, 13 or 14 numbers, $1 on each, because the probability changes and i thought there might be a sweet spot. i mean you're buying probability, but idk, seems like the ideal prob/cost comes in at 3.9 for 11 numbers (28%/11). 10, 12&13 came in at 3.8 and 14 dropped off at 3.7. idk why it spikes like that, check my math. the main decision here is should i do that or play a dozen or column at 2:1? it's a close call. since the probability is 12/38, i for the same 10-14 chip range, the cost is 3.1 and the probability gets cheaper from there. i used to play 2 columns at 24/38, and put a chip to cover 0&00, but if you're cold, the chip chews on the p/l big time. but generally if you sit down at a table and play $5 on each column you can play for 1-2-1/2 hours before you walk if you start with $100. All that said, nobody ever beats the casino long term. EVERY game has a mid-term and even short-term negative expectation.
maybe start with 2 dollars the martinga stragegy. but I would like to see more stragegy in more change to win: 50% and 60% and 70% and 80% I am working on that. you cannot place money on every number then you will not win, but you donot have to put on every number your money.
Really nice video. Thanks a lot ! Love the math behind it. / Even though I know there's still money to be made with roulette. The goal* is not to "beat the wheel", but to make a bit of profit and be satisfied with it. Also,... the 5.3% is basically the edge of the casino (for American Roulette). It's funnier to play on a French roulette (with only 1.35% edge). Again, thank you for that math course. It was exquisite !
That's it. You either lose a little money ( your initial budget for playing ) or double or triple it then quit the table without falling to the long run losing thing. That's my strategy but sadly gamblers think they will keep doubling their profits endlessly !!!!
this is wrong, the maths is right but it will not happen this way, example every number has an equal chance of coming out, so 1 number can come a lot in a row because all numbers have equal chance, but you don't see a lot of doubles in a row in every 37 spins and you always get 13 numbers NOT coming out, "maths with a pencil and playing for Roulette for real" are 2 totally different things
You don't need as much money for martingale if you bet red or black. A lightly biased coin toss probability. You are much more likely to win unless the wheel is biased in some way. And they all are. They are a physical system bound by the laws of physics.
Strategy doesn’t work even still, casinos have already put limits in place. So you have a minimum and maximum bet. So if you lost enough times in a row your progressive system wouldn’t work.
I've been studying roulette for 8 years and it took the entire amount of time to notice a glitch in every roulette wheel and if you figure out how to take advantage of it you can make at least 500 an hour starting with a 15 min which I do. So the game is not unbeatable just very complex to beat. I've watched every video on youtube about roulette and no one is close.
True, whenever I go to the casino by me I never see anyone use any type of strategy they just pick their fav numbers and hope to win. But if say 1 person by every casino knew my strategy they could if they wanted to over time take millions ever year and the casino can't legally stop them. Right now I could make a few 100k a year but I don't want the casino on my case so I make a little at a time just under the amount of them noticing.
Sorry the glitch it something I haven't told anyone for 2 reasons. 1 the would have to get rid of roulette of go bankrupt and second I need the roulette to stick around because I have to pay off some bills in about 20 years ill write a book saying exactly how to win but was for now I can't and don't have the time. Every day I still try to improve upon my system which means 12 hrs of research when I'm nota at the casino and 10 hours when I'm there. my time is very limited.
I option visit casino the strategy you gave us it’s ok but when you put your money as large stake option you lose because they always give you less money where is small stake I option put the big money and come with small money , However, if they get any chance like you put 5 number in area just one number no money garenty they will hit where is no money they are much worse than bookies rollete mechan ... It’s one person only win casino and book maker no one else in the world.
I wanna come out with a casino game. I love for u to show me how to run a million hand on the game so I can have the numbers right. So plz get back with me. Even if u say no that's cool.
Great Video! Best one I've seen! No lying, no BS, no guaranteeing ways to win with ridiculous patterns, no marketing books or videos, etc. Just the honest truth
the real trick to winning is to never even go to the casino in the first place
Great video. Everything is true and accurate, and it should be added why Martingale never pays off over time: The casinos protect themselves against Martingale by having table limits. That is really the only reason for table limits, considering that the casinos love for you to bet as big as you want to. At most tables, even someone with an unlimited bankroll and using Martingale would have to stop doubling their bet after only about 8 losses. The first string of 8 losses in a row, and the Martingale jig is up. The only way to win at roulette is to actually be able to predict ahead of time where the ball will land, with a degree of accuracy better than 5.26%. If you could predict a half side of the wheel, or even a section of up to 34 slots (leaving out only a 4-number section), a player could win, but the 34-area section would have to be 100% accurate to win in the long run.
Best bet to win at Roulette is start with as large a bankroll as possible and play a few rounds of Martingale, then walk away with your winnings and never come back.
I was at the Hard Rock casino in Tampa last night made $310 with only
$100 as my bank roll betting on the dozens.
The odds are against you and the odds dont change. You turn bets in your favor by betting on probabilities and fluctuations in amount bet. Bet low until its probable you can win and then increase your bet. You can also hedge your bet by placing a second small bet on the green to turn those into a win. This is what makes it fun. It's a challenge and you use strategy to win. It's like a game of chess.
Since you are essentially paying for variance, the best bet by far is betting on a single number. The rake is the same as a red or black bet, but you get more variance for free.
Excellent Video clip! Apologies for butting in, I would love your initial thoughts. Have you ever tried - Mahorrla Earning Gamble Method (erm, check it on google should be there)? It is a great exclusive guide for making money with a proven roulette system without the normal expense. Ive heard some incredible things about it and my work colleague finally got cool results with it.
Who else came across the funny medium article?
The best way to beat a a roulette or casino is not playing at all,
Or open your own casino 😂😂😂
Excellent video content! Excuse me for the intrusion, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you heard about - Mahorrla Earning Gamble Method (probably on Google)? It is a smashing one off product for making money with a proven roulette system without the normal expense. Ive heard some great things about it and my friend after many years got excellent success with it.
Trueee
i lose my 2 month salary in casino.
3rd month i win 83000.
now its 3rd month after win i didn't go 🤗😁😁😁
Ça c'est match nul !
Just like in craps, as you diversify your bets, you aren't betting on a number to win but rather you are betting against other numbers to win.
in european roulette the house edge is 2.70 on ALL bets..btw my fav game is call bets..specifically 1,9,6 and 2 with their two neighbours. because you cover all the orphans, 4 numbers from the small series (33,16,27,13) and 6 numbers from the big series (25,2,21,4,22,18).. ...with this you cover 18 numbers which is roughly half of the wheel...16 numbers bring you 75 euros ( if you start with 100 eur) and the numbers 14 and 17 bring you 350 eur....i know its a long shot but what the hell...its fun as long as you play with money you CAN afford to lose :)
Play on one to one odds. Place the minimum bet. When loose, double it plus your initial bet. Loose. Double it plus your initial bet. Martingale + initial bet. Do the math. You win on every single spin the minimum bet regardless of what comes out, unless 0 screws it.
1.10 - 2.30 - 3.70 - 4.150 - 5.310
5 spins. Spent 570. 5th spin pays you 310 plus your 310 back 620 minus 570 equals 50 in 5 spins. Beware of the table limits. Martingale is a waste of time for nothing. Martingale + your initial bet wins. Good luck.
Non ça ne gagne pas .
Superb explanation using math. It really hit the spot.
This is a pretty good video. However there are smarter ways to gamble on the roulette table. The bets you described are commonly used by new players. I do use a variation of the Martingale system and it works well. I double down (sometimes triple down) on every loss with $1-5 and when it happens. I always add a bet to the green zero and include any losses there within my red/black bet. I should also mention the Non-American version only has one zero and it pays 35/1. With that said, once my bets are getting high I also place $5 or $10 on zero green leaving me with a 50% chance to win red/black or 1% chance to hit green.The real killer is the table max bet. That's the weakness of the Martingale. But, do a video on the odds of losing 10 times in a row...please because it's very rare. Seven losses is rare and at seven losses doubling down from $1 is only a $64 bet with a total loss of about $130. There are times when I do lose that many times but seriously I win way more and at the end of the day I always hit on the green once or twice besides winning half my bets. I actually use this with $1 online and I haven't lost big yet. I've only won when I am done for the day but as you pointed out you're not winning very much very fast. I still make close to $100 dollars when I do play using roughly a hour or two of my time. Just make sure you;re using a trust worthy site. You can google them because there are plenty of people using them and judging them.
Il n'y a pas de site de confiance .
If you play virtual roulette, only high/low or red/black and martingale often gets a lot. It's ultimately less than 50% odds, but for gambling it's not bad.
Could you please break down for me the math of betting on the black and at the same time the first column (the one with most red numbers).
Thanks in advance!
The other problem with the martingale method is that most casinos have a table betting max.
i won $500 betting on #26 and around the zero... i seen the wheel was basis so i jumped on it while it landed on around the zero 3-4 times in a row... then my bets went down when it jumped to the opposite side of the wheel... i noticed alot of high numbers were coming 4-5 times in a row so i also jumped on betting in the 3rd 12's, placing 5-10 on each number in the 3rd 12's and 2-3 chips in the %38 1st 12's... the 2nd 12's were cold and were at a low %16... while the 3rd 12's was like %48.....
Best way I've looked at losing that 5.3 cents is the same way as a business pays taxes. Just because they have to give a cut to the house doesn't mean the business won't be successful. The house odds on European is 2.7% but I've never met a gambler that has lost only 2.7% of their bankroll.
you forget casino's have a max. bid to counteract the martingale method.
I don't have money to pay him so leaving a comment instead for the algo. He is the best.
Double zero? Not here in UK
Some riverboat casinos have a triple zero!
@@olderthandadirt : Yeah, it's called the "Mexican Roulette", when there's 3 zeros,.. an amazing scam.
NEVER BET, BEFORE THE CROUPIER THROWS THE BALL
This is the 1st UA-cam commit I've ever left....The passion you have for this in addition to the knowledge you drop, hats off to you man, thank you, my life is better having had watched this....Hey....Cyber High 5, here's to you bro!! {[(Side note)]} With your book smarts & my street smarts combined with our casino experience per say & the passion, scorpio bro? IDk I think the girls might be right, anyway...Squirrel....I encourage you to take intrest in what I have to offer. IDK how else to say this but take a chance, I'm not some random idiot, I have the capital, it's already up and running, I'm a solo outfit, all u would do is expand the margins and take a percentage....I really hope I here from you...Carry out good sir & again, thank you!!
problem with math is it does not address patterns and patterns are much better indicators that an outcome is likely or not likely than merely working out the house edge!
AdDocker Probability doesn't, but Statistics does....stay within the "Bell."
Of course the house has the advantage but it is not the point. That is why they are in business. But it doesnt mean you cannot escape the disadvantage. I try my strategies and i am always in profit however small.
u know whats really messed up, when i play online roulette with real money at a online casino and i do the double down thing at the end of the video u get into some serious money like u said. even if u start from $2 or $5. Also the crazy thing is that colours/oddeven/highlow they run sometimes ive had up to 13 times. even at $2 hands that equates to 32,768 at 13 times doubling down just to be up $2 with all that debit. u win some u lose some.
Hi mate, i'm trying to find the expected values for a roulette wheel in this game i'm making a video about but i'm not 100% sure if my math is correct. Could I possibly contact you for help with this?
So this is my question; I have come up with a strategy where I can actually win positive net 24/38 times on a $150 bet (due to 21 different ways to hit). This strategy actually “wins” 33/38 times, but doesn’t net money 9/33. I used your formula, and sure enough, the -5.3 cents shows up. What I don’t understand is that I have more of a probability to win net money. In fact, only 5/38 do I actually lose all 150. Why is this? Is this due to the payouts? Looking through my notes, I only have 1/38 chance of netting $150 ($300 total winning). The next best payout is $141, with a 2/38 odds. As you can never win every bet in roulette, my approach was to limit the losses and maximize how many times I won. Mathematically it appears like there is no way to come on top?
Well you must vary the amount of units that you bet, otherwise the odds are against you and take away your money over time. If you have enough money to go for rows or even go for singles and always be able to double the amount of your units in play, you should actually win more than you lose in total.
Can get the probability of a hopscotch strategy?
Muy cierto. Triste de saberlo, la realidad de las cosas. Evidentemente los casinos, si lo tienen es porque es negocio conveniente, sino no lo tendrían. Sólo por diversión dice. No como una forma real y viable hacer dinero. Matemáticamente comprobado, ya no hay duda.
You’re forgetting the 3 to 1 pay out on the first set the second set and the third set
dude, if you change the 1 dollar to 1 thousand dollars. then were talking. so yes its worth doing the martingale
Can it be calculated how many times you'd have to double your bet on average before you win in the Martingale scenario?
It depends on your bet. You just have to take the inverse of the probability of winning and substract 1. For example if you are always betting for columns and you are playing with the double zeros roulette then the probability of winning this bet is 12/38. The inverse is 38/12 ~= 3.17 and substract 1 ---> 2.17. This is, you would have to double your bets 2.17 times in average (you would have to double it 2 times more often than 3).
Explanation: Let X be the random variable "times you play before you win". Then X has a geometric distribution with parameter p (the probability of winning a bet). If you are always betting the same kind of bet (for example, you are always betting columns) the probability of having to play k times before you win is P(X=k) = p*(1-p)^(k-1). The expected value of any geometric distribution is 1/p so in average you would have to play 1/p times, which is equivalent to doubling the bet 1/p - 1 bets.
Note: This doesn't apply if you change your type of bet, for example, from columns to row. However if you are betting columns, you could change the number of column and this will still hold, because the probability of winning is the same for all 3.
Isn't there something off on your calculation for a corner bet? You show 4/38 but there are only 36 numbers involved in corners, and there are only 22 corners to bet.
Brilliant explanation
Glad you think so!
The james bond was developed for a wheel with one zero, not two. also, you seem to be missing that you keep your winning bet. For example, you hit the second 18 and win 140 and lose the 60, you now have 280. Your bet plus the winnings. Your numbers are right as for probability but you seem to be doing the math for 35 for 1, not to 1. But I do agree with you, all games are losing bets in the casinos.
odds winning at casino are CRAP and baccarat ... if u play slot and others..u pay them electric bill
You don't have to play every spins
Cheers for the Video clip! Sorry for butting in, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you considered - Mahorrla Earning Gamble Method (do a google search)? It is a great exclusive product for making money with a proven roulette system without the normal expense. Ive heard some interesting things about it and my cousin finally got astronomical results with it.
iceman340h I
So what's the calculation if you bet $1 on 1st 12 and $1 on 2nd 12? Can you please help me with that? Thanks
What if you play 2 12s or 2 rows making it 24/38 how would that work out mathematically in the long run ?
What happens if I use an increased bet?
for example: I'll bet 9 units the neighbors of 0 ( 17 numbers out of 37, european roulette, one 0)
14 numbers pays 8/1
3 numbers pays 11/1 ( 0, 2, 3)
if I lose, I bet the next spin 18 units. Let's say I use the Fibonacci Sequence (1, 2, 3, 5, 8...)
if I hit the first 3 spins I always return to first (9 units). If I hit after 3-th spin, I get back 2 bets and go from there!
Probability to hit a number is 17/37=46% average
My question is: EV is positive or negativ in long-term?
Wait isn't the dozen bet a 2:1 winnings so you should get tripled your bet?
nvm
right that would work, highest holding record in history 62 blacks or reds in a row , bankrolled enough to reach 620 times for safety that would never happen not even in a trillion years in a honest roulette game.
If i put 10$ on 5 thn by luck 5 comes then how much total i get
I would very much love to see more of these kinds of videos!
How about Blackjack or craps? I guess Poker would be a bit more complicated.
excellent video! i was crunching some numbers on roulette myself and found it's a loser, there's no way around it. i was trying to see if it was better to play 10, 11, 12, 13 or 14 numbers, $1 on each, because the probability changes and i thought there might be a sweet spot. i mean you're buying probability, but idk, seems like the ideal prob/cost comes in at 3.9 for 11 numbers (28%/11). 10, 12&13 came in at 3.8 and 14 dropped off at 3.7. idk why it spikes like that, check my math. the main decision here is should i do that or play a dozen or column at 2:1? it's a close call. since the probability is 12/38, i for the same 10-14 chip range, the cost is 3.1 and the probability gets cheaper from there.
i used to play 2 columns at 24/38, and put a chip to cover 0&00, but if you're cold, the chip chews on the p/l big time. but generally if you sit down at a table and play $5 on each column you can play for 1-2-1/2 hours before you walk if you start with $100.
All that said, nobody ever beats the casino long term. EVERY game has a mid-term and even short-term negative expectation.
first you need to wait and learn how many round then you do calculate radius , not the numbe radius represent the number,
maybe start with 2 dollars the martinga stragegy.
but I would like to see more stragegy in more change to win: 50% and 60% and 70% and 80% I am working on that.
you cannot place money on every number then you will not win, but you donot have to put on every number your money.
If anybody i mean anybody knows how to beat roulette why he/she want to share it ?
this video should be titled how to lose money playing roulette lol
That's how gambling problems develop haha
In case 3, did u miss 140*2 - 60 ( u said 140-60 ) ???
This method is good for the baby..!!!
You must read this book : "Les points faibles de la roulette" Whidarte J. !!!
Les compliments peuvent etre valables s'ils sont exprimer par un tiers . L'autocongratulation n'a aucune valeur !
you missed the sucker bet for 6 to 1
gonna run this past my statistics professor but im sure the math is flawed on certain laws.
probable outcomes seems off
their isn't a strategy, it's all luck.
Ever seen a person getting kicked out of a casino playing roulette without cheating?? Exactly.
Very good video.
Great video
so the only way to win money is to already be rich, much like real life
Really nice video. Thanks a lot ! Love the math behind it. / Even though I know there's still money to be made with roulette. The goal* is not to "beat the wheel", but to make a bit of profit and be satisfied with it. Also,... the 5.3% is basically the edge of the casino (for American Roulette). It's funnier to play on a French roulette (with only 1.35% edge). Again, thank you for that math course. It was exquisite !
That's it. You either lose a little money ( your initial budget for playing ) or double or triple it then quit the table without falling to the long run losing thing. That's my strategy but sadly gamblers think they will keep doubling their profits endlessly !!!!
Some people lose 15.9 cents and some people may win 10.6 cents go home with your 10.6 cents.
this is wrong, the maths is right but it will not happen this way, example every number has an equal chance of coming out, so 1 number can come a lot in a row because all numbers have equal chance, but you don't see a lot of doubles in a row in every 37 spins and you always get 13 numbers NOT coming out, "maths with a pencil and playing for Roulette for real" are 2 totally different things
You don't need as much money for martingale if you bet red or black. A lightly biased coin toss probability. You are much more likely to win unless the wheel is biased in some way. And they all are. They are a physical system bound by the laws of physics.
bet on sports. you win more, my accuracy 90 percentage,
Eu só jogo com 3 ficha na mesa
Strategy doesn’t work even still, casinos have already put limits in place. So you have a minimum and maximum bet. So if you lost enough times in a row your progressive system wouldn’t work.
Very genius 🤔
There is no strategy to win....only wait and watch and play this game ...
I will give you garnty for win
Play on a European wheel - you'll lose less.
Or wash your brain.
Liverpix we are not smarter than the inventor of the roulette he made it to win people money if there is a strategy to win we never saw poor people
lolo lolo wrong
Every dealer knows this within a week of training
marlon thomas what do you mean?
lolo lolo it wasn’t invented as a money making machine at all
I've been studying roulette for 8 years and it took the entire amount of time to notice a glitch in every roulette wheel and if you figure out how to take advantage of it you can make at least 500 an hour starting with a 15 min which I do. So the game is not unbeatable just very complex to beat. I've watched every video on youtube about roulette and no one is close.
sorry but I'm not giving away my secret on how to beat the wheel if it were to spread casinos would have to get rid of roulette.
True, whenever I go to the casino by me I never see anyone use any type of strategy they just pick their fav numbers and hope to win. But if say 1 person by every casino knew my strategy they could if they wanted to over time take millions ever year and the casino can't legally stop them. Right now I could make a few 100k a year but I don't want the casino on my case so I make a little at a time just under the amount of them noticing.
The Market Gamer hiiii . I have lost $ 50,000 in casino . Can you help me to recover the same in India. I am ready to share my profit with you.
How much bank roll are you looking at
Sorry the glitch it something I haven't told anyone for 2 reasons. 1 the would have to get rid of roulette of go bankrupt and second I need the roulette to stick around because I have to pay off some bills in about 20 years ill write a book saying exactly how to win but was for now I can't and don't have the time. Every day I still try to improve upon my system which means 12 hrs of research when I'm nota at the casino and 10 hours when I'm there. my time is very limited.
I have one system , slowly it gives me return , no mathematics simple mind game
How ??? Like following the ball..?
@@Learner5555 search my name in facebook and msg me on messenger
Hiii..there are many similar profiles...do u have wTsapp
@@Learner5555 9598053851
@@pankajrajoria6835 i tried n the number is rejected...i called from Singapore..
Roulette has nothing to do with Math whatsoever.
But with the James bond strategy you bet $50 and won 250... Your up 50$$$
boss how to play a good bagaina kah
Your hacker sir
WE ARE SORRY . EINSTEIN WAS WRONG !
THE BEST IS HERE.TRY IT AND WIN FOR FREE !
@
I option visit casino the strategy you gave us it’s ok but when you put your money as large stake option you lose because they always give you less money where is small stake I option put the big money and come with small money ,
However, if they get any chance like you put 5 number in area just one number no money garenty they will hit where is no money they are much worse than bookies rollete mechan ...
It’s one person only win casino and book maker no one else in the world.
You haven,t done the same math with martingale compared to other strategies. So it,s not correct
I wanna come out with a casino game. I love for u to show me how to run a million hand on the game so I can have the numbers right. So plz get back with me. Even if u say no that's cool.
I am also post my winning video in my channel
Ok
Yo me pregunto,mucha matematica pero le ganaste alguna vez al casino o entraste a jugar,sino eso que mostras no sirve para nada
Your calculation is wrong, expectation is not the way you calculated it.
Hindi me batao please...
Dude your table is missing a lot.... You make a few good points but other than that most of what your pushing is wrong.
thats why we dont play American roulette in Europe!
Cool video, good math exercise for me 😀
My top tip
Bet on the Special olimpics.
Because there all winners
I win every time I play. I don't play every spin. It took 40 years to perfect it.
Please describe the way. Any can maintain his expenditure playing roulette. Please say.
abrar islam No one wins every time so he is lying.
Sir plz help mi
I was expecting russian roulette
India KE liye contact Karo Bhai
i most won today 100 dollers!
I thank you need a doctor go faster
Please help me please 🥺🙏🆘😢😭😩😥
You calculation is wrong. Especially for the 2nd scenario.
Waste of our hard earn money to play roullete
bos tolong dong berikan rumus biarsaya menang
Thx
Bullshido play at casino and show it.....not on paper
sell your soul to the devil and let the him do the winning for you :)
How to sell???