Sorry I wasnt convinced. To be me APLS remains a black box solution. If is that effective, they should share it to other countries their achievements and claim Nobel peace prize. Facility should also be opened to the Chinese, Korean or other interested scientist to investigate and allowing them to verify that the water are safe. To date, Japan says no. So how to regain that trust ?
Nobel Peace Prize? It's a simple filter not unlike my home countertop model that would also remove all radionuclide particles, but not tritium. Seven countries have tested the water, including South Korea that you mentioned, but China refused to participate because for them it is not about health and safety, it's about propaganda.
CNA is lying when saying it is used in watches. It has been illegal in Germany and Switzerland since 1998 and tritium use in Japan is also illegal, its use in watches has been phased out due to its danger.
How efficient is ALPS? Has the treated water been analysed and if yes, where is the report? Or are you assuming that once the contaminated water is filtered, all the radioactive elements are successfully removed? Unless the Japanese Government release the report of the filtered contaminated water before it is released into the sea, I will never be convinced. Furthermore, the sea belongs to the entire human race. Japanese Government has no right to subject it to such risk. This is an irreversible process, and in years to come, when something bad happens, it's too late!
@@jamesluvsjam5796 What "selfish act"? All nuclear power plants have always released the same tritiated water and the full report clearly shows at least six countries have tested the water and deemed it safe.
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk Japan's release is on a much greater and vast scale. That's a big difference. Besides, how many more countries, scientific or environment agencies have raised valid concerns but were brushed aside by Japan? Many!
I've always giving a thumbs-up for CNA's reporting quality until this episode. The host kept circling around those circumstantial evidences instead of going straight into the root cause of the dispute: the difference between the normal treated nuclear water (which have no direct contact with the radioactive chemicals) and the Fukushima's nuclear plant water that's DIRECTLY CONTACTED WITH THE RADIATIVE TRITIUM. Why couldn't CNA spend a bit more time in figuring this out first and revealing this essential piece of information to the viewers? Whether it's motivated by political or some other factors, they are just the secondary consideration if your episode's subject is to find out whether the sea water filled with the radioactive water where the seafood comes from is safe. What's making your program's quality even worse in this episode is that your point of focus seems to be only relying on those opinions which are highly prone to subjectivity, and on the so-called experts who only spoke their personal opinions without convincible fact base but only citing the already controversy-filled investigation report by the IAEA. Just so you know, the IAEA's report has never made any guarantee or endorsement for the safety of the tested nuclear water if the host or the CNA's program editor had ever read or studied the report yourself before producing this episode. More thorough and in-depth research backed by un-biased scientific evidence which can clearly demonstrate the whole leaking process and its immediate consequence is needed before the host can call for the viewers not to worry. Because essentially you are advocating viewers to buy into your poorly-argued and groundless reporting. CNA, you could have done better than just recklessly and conveniently collecting the 'He said, she said' types of sources to make such uninformed programs.
ALPS is effective in removing all but the tritium, The radionuclide that all nuclear power plants in the world have always released the same tritiated water. You could have read the analysis report for ALPS and the water before making a F 0 0 L of yourself on the internet.
No need to read your whole book, you failed right away. ALPS has repeatedly proven to be effective for all but the tritium, so the water is the same as what all nuclear power plants release.
Treated water CAN be safe, IF TEPCO and Japan government do their job. Problem is, precisely because TEPCO DID NOT DO THEIR JOB in the first place, otherwise we would not be even discussing this now!! Not to mentioned even after the incident, we even found leakage of undiluted water. THEY FAILED TWICE!! The real focus of this video should be on what are the processes in place to make sure water are treated properly. And whether there is a truly independent third party constantly monitoring water safety (eg IAEA being accused of receiving money from Japan). CNA pretend that they are unbiased by only focusing on the ‘scientific’ part of the story. They only briefly mention (or didn’t mention at all) WHAT ARE THE EXACT measures and monitoring process implemented. This, in effect implicitly assumes TEPCO and Japan government will do their job. This is completely unacceptable for a national media. What if TEPCO went broke in five years time and they didn’t have enough money to properly maintain the dilution system. Some Singaporean mother-to-be think the fish is still safe, eat them and give born to a retarded baby. Should CNA be liable to the mother? Is it because Singapore government do not want to test all the fish from Japan, hence this video?
Check out TEPCO largest shareholdings then link up the puzzle. Safe or not was nvr the focus here. Control the media then market the idea, aka brainwashing.
Trust is built on multi-party testing, but Japan only disclosed its own test results and did not adopt Chinese testing agencies. Even so, a recognized third-party testing organization can regulate the quality of discharged water. Unfortunately, over time, Japan has shown significant lapses in existing emissions management, such as frequent instances of manual valves being left open. In the absence of effective oversight, such serious incidents could occur more than once, underscoring Japan's untrustworthiness in this regard.
i bet most ppl think their salmon in their sushi is from Japan, just because Sushi is a Japanese cruisine. they might be surprised to know their "salmon nigiri" sushi has nothing to do with Japan, in some outlets, they use Salmon from Chile or Norway, short grain rice from Australia..
But the seaweed is from Japan. And seaweed is a rich source of Iodine. Radioactive Iodine is found in the contaminated water. So if you eat a lot of sushi (which uses seaweed from Japan), you may have a lot of radioactive iodine in your body!
@@boonh4634 japan isnt the only source of seaweed.. top notch sushi resturants of cos use quality ingredients but i dunno about those 50cents or 60cents sushi ..Korea also export seaweed if you google which country exports most seaweed, its actually China and even Indonesia etc
Correct. Japan still produce a lot of their own rice though, but more expensive. Japan also eats farmed salmon due to the parasites from the wild ones.
All nuclear power plants in the world have always released the same tritiated water. Show us the 'effects' you speak of. The Japanese have a diet high in seafood and live longer than anyone on the planet.
If the water is so clean and even drinkable as Japan has claimed, then how about pouring this "clean" water to your water utility system and let your citizens drink it? BTW: Looks like most western countries are basically silent about this. If the same thing happens on China, how would Japan (and those western countries) react? Western countries accuse China of their "uncontroilled" rocket debris threating lives and damaging environment, but allow Japan to dump radioactive water to the ocean. Double standard!
If the so-called treated water is as clean as claimed then why did they not allow verification by independent 3rd party organisation when requested? Did this so-called reporter try some fish raised in this dirty water?
@@leexingha Desalination can be an expensive method compared to traditional sources of freshwater, primarily due to the energy required to remove salt from water and the costs associated with building and maintaining desalination plants. The expenses can vary depending on factors like the technology used, the energy source, plant location, and local labor costs.
@@tjm0112 why r u getting defensive when i just refuted the other dude that seawater can be converted into fresh water so it can be used for agriculture? but to reply to ur statement, lets say that these treated waters are not 100% safe, imagine Japan just dumped the waters coz it wants to cut huge cost. ur very brilliant! ur argument clearly shows u r trying to defend a side but failed very miserably
That was a meme started by Chinese propagandists for social media. The washed up fish was from many months before this water release and in a different sea.
28/12/23 ( Thursday ) 9.53 am. After tons of dead fishes washed up on Pacific side of Hokkaido, 1 month after this digital exclusive was released. CNA insider should have known the answer.
At the end of the day, if it is so safe, why don't these water be poured into the reservoirs in Japan so that Japanese could drink it off as normal water?
@rbc812 We DO further treat our waste water into drinkable water. But comparing industrial water and nuclear water isn't really comparing apple to apple is it? If it was, then so many countries wouldn't be in an uproar over it. Its an undefensible move by the Japs.
@rbc812 And to clarify, I am not against Japan's move if they can assure that releasing the water is safe. The US based National Association of Marine Labs also voiced concern over Japan's lack of adequate and accurate scientific data and the long term effect this release will have on marine life and food chains. There has been inadequate radiological, ecological impact assessment on how a release on such an unprecedented vast scale would impact the ocean bed and marine life There is also worldwide concern about the ability to monitor marine radiation levels after the release and how it would spread. Japan should have continued working with the agencies and her neighbours to assure the world that it is safe, or concerned other alternatives, instead of brushing aside concerns and proceeding unilaterally.
@@jamesluvsjam5796 International Atomic Energy Agency had confirmed the waste water is safe. I can even accuse all the nuclear wastewater from all nuclear plants are not safe, will you agree then?
I got news for you. Food that contains potasium is usually naturally radioactive so bananas, nuts, avocados, potatoes, beans, carrots, red meat, etc. The question is not if the food radioactive/not. Rather question the safety of radioactivity in the food itself.
If the water was really safe, Japan should have kept it for their own consumption and usage, or treat it further before using it themselves. The fact that they didnt do so, and chose to release it into the ocean, tells us everything we need to know.
It's either you are only a half wit, or you wanted your own version of narration. The ocean will further dilute the radioactive tritium, which other nuclear facilities in the neighbouring countries do the same anyway.
Your argument is weird. If your argument holds, then Singapore should not release treated water into the sea. Singapore should keep it for internal consumption. This applies every country in the world.
@rbc812 Comparing industrial water to nuclear water is ridiculous. There is obviously a great concern about Japan's selfish act and that's why so many of her neighbours are so upset. Totally indefensible move.
@rbc812 And to clarify, I am not against Japan's move if they can assure that releasing the water is safe. The US based National Association of Marine Labs also voiced concern over Japan's lack of adequate and accurate scientific data and the long term effect this release will have on marine life and food chains. There has been inadequate radiological, ecological impact assessment on how a release on such an unprecedented vast scale would impact the ocean bed and marine life There is also worldwide concern about the ability to monitor marine radiation levels after the release and how it would spread. Japan should have continued working with the agencies and her neighbours to assure the world that it is safe, or concerned other alternatives, instead of brushing aside concerns and proceeding unilaterally.
@@jamesluvsjam5796 pls do not ignore the fact everyday there are so much radioactive water poured into the sea by so many countries. do you have the data to show that industrial waste water is less harmful even though it is not treated?
Why isn’t the treated (tritium) water used in industry in lieu of or before releasing directing into the ocean? ei cooling machinery (in manufacturing plants), hydroelectric generation, transportation…
The issue is different experts have different opinions as we saw in Covid and as this isn’t something that’s tested or human studies . We can’t accurately say for sure the long term results
That seems super super healthy, you are the most healthiest person in the world after eating so much Japanese fish , l guess you love it so so much 😂😂..........
Sure we do since tritium has been all over the world since the beginning of time, and all nuclear power plants in the world have always released the same tritiated water.
@@biaofo5258try to eat more Japanese fish yourself, that's more solid to prove that your arguments, but others still refuse to eat toxic fish from Japan. Japanese Fish are healthy for you.Good fish for sure , I'm on your side 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂..........
To know if it is…make a trip to Bikini Island Atoll in the south pacific, take samples of sea life and test them for generational Radioactive Exposure post NATO Nuclear bomb testings 50-60!years ago…
Australian don't know much about its nuclear toxic water releasing into ocean for 30 years. I told them they're in shock.not many media tells to the public.
Don't be silly, he didn't eat Japanese fish, they are imported, that was a show only, local people not buying fish , it's telling the truth from their citizens.
If the treated water has negligible impact to environment and human health, just consume within Japan for construction, irrigation and all other water related national activities, why rush to go to the sea? All excuses and scientific analysis from here sounds silly and ridiculous. All the essential points are avoided in the video and some unimportant/unrelated stuff are amplified in the video. Even the reason and the statements that Japan provides is not persuasive and are full of loopholes, but CNA analyses and justify in the video. Japan said they had no money to deal with so-called treated water and soon after which they bought another land again in Brazil. :) There are documentaries interviewing residents in Fukushima, which evidences that Japan government never actually placed any action for protecting the island and whole world from the explosion, and they still claims they had everything in control and even filmed movie to tell a fake story and fake Japan's hero image in the explosion. Anyway, nuclear waster into the sea is not recent news, no even Japan or the country behind Japan did so, developed countries are all in the environment sacrifice from long long ago. Environment risk is yes, human health risk is also yes, trust your common sense. Media is the trumpet belonging to the capital and the power class.
But the Japanese government refused to have those water as normal drinking water for the Japanese. They just want to release it into the seas, so that others will get contaminated, too . . .
If the water is so clean and even drinkable as Japan has claimed, then how about pouring this "clean" water to your water utility system and let your citizens drink it? BTW: Looks like most western countries are basically silent about this. If the same thing happens on China, how would Japan (and those western countries) react? Western countries accuse China of their "uncontroilled" rocket debris threating lives and damaging environment, but allow Japan to dump radioactive water to the ocean. Double standard!
You can have all the Japanese fish free eat them daily for improve your health, super healthy fish for you 3 fish meals daily, you will grow special, very special....... congratulations......
if its so safe use it as their own drinking water, swimming pools, and what not. even the Japanese locals are dubious of the govt. all these scientists and experts are not the one that are affected, and can therefore issue irresponsible comments to the rest of the world. i dare these people to stay, eat, drink for the next few decades there. and CNS Insider, you reply on controversial reports for your reporting, seriously ????
They are different. The waste water from Fukushima nuclear plant passed through nuclear waste. While other nuclear plants did not have direct contact with nuclear material.
That being said, most of the chemicals have been removed, except for tritium which have levels much lower than many countries/reactors around the world.
Ya. China’s nuclear treated water are actually many times higher along its coast. Why else do you think they are encroaching other countries’ waters and expanding their influence out of their own territorial waters? They polluted their own coasts so they have no choice but to encroach and try to claim other seas as theirs.
Classic PR stunt showing Kishidia and his henchmen eating teishouku. Today's communications landscape has drastically changed. Modern consumers are not 100% susceptible to such stunts. We trust Yoshizawa's version of events than Kishida and TEPCO's "PR" team's. An international Human Rights or Consumers Rights Watch along with "globally sanctioned" presses like Aljazeera News need to test the waters around Fukushima and the results published. This concerns food safety; politicians' voices and powers can be swept aside or under the rug.
Well you have to eat Japanese fish daily , that is more solid support about the safety you believe in , l fully support you eating Japanese fish 3 meals a day for 30+ years , l believed that you believed it's healthy super super healthy for yourself, you deserved it , no problem at all😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.............
Yes, continue to reach out for Japanese produce, feed the kids and eldetly. Perhaps put the young, our future man and woman, who cannot reproduce at, unknown risks. Whose to blame if it was indeed Tritium? 20 yrs would have pass, blame who then? TEPCO? Blame your own decision and greed. Pour the wastewater for the world to share, for they've had their share too in the past.
it could have been buried underground and forgotten, however, the Janapese corporations would not sacrifice their land and choose to pollute the whole world. The Japanese should demonstrate how safe tritium waste water is by drinking it. So does the CNA reporter
While i agree with the first point, the second one is just dumb. Many chemicals are safe to be dumped in the oceans, but will kill you if you drink it directly. Its all about concentration
@@fathurrochman2469Other countries don't dump radioactive contaminated water like Japan. Please know the difference between radioactive cooling waste water vs radioactive contaminated water.
For the Japan haters out there, if Tritium water released by Japan is a threat, wait till you know about the number of nuclear water waste from China that is 1000x more in volume, but undisclosed information from Chinese government on their treatment. Even France as the current number 1 on nuclear water waste cause no concern in Europe, and they are being transparent
I'm not a Japan hater, I just don't want to consume anything that the Japanese themselves consider untrustworthy. You, on the other hand, are clearly a Chinese hater. So, feel free to consume your fish, perhaps it can eventually turn you into a Japanese you like so much
@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk that's not the truth. the truth is, no matter how safe it is, it all comes down to having someone else's garbage dumped in common area, forcing others to take a risk, just so Japan can save money. You might be willing, others are not
@@japjungho4645 Show where I haven't told the truth. Your country doesn't pollute? All nuclear power plants have always released the same tritiated water and nothing in world history has ever been harmed by this practice. Tritium is produced in nature in larger quantities the man does and you won't be able to find anyone in world history that has been harmed by nature's pollution either.
Why? It is next to sea on very low level. There is really not much demand around there. And it does not magically flow uphill... A basic fact that those fearful of it don't understand either... The sea is basically next to it and it is the simplest and least wasteful place to dump it...
@@_Ekaros Come on. Since the accident 12 years ago, underground water and rain are continually use to cool the melted fuel and fuel debris. Why need to create another system to pump sea water for ALPS ? Why not using the same underground water system for dilution? If it is safe for drinking, why dump it into the sea?
@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk The contaminated water generated by Fukushima nuclear plant has come into direct contact from the debris of melted down cores. Not appropriate to compare wastewater for normal operating nuclear plants in general. (And Fukushima nuclear plant did use underground water to cool the melted down cores. Please search on internet)
The question would be why Japan bans advanced semiconductor equipment and materials from export to China ? Japan can't give an straight answer without resorting to vague "national security" blah..blah..blah.. So, China is just returning the favor.....
No point talking on how safe is fish caught off japan seas. Better be safe than sorry. I rather not eat it then later in life suffering from its radioactive found in those fishes. Singapore govt is not going to TEST EVERY FISH IMPORTED FROM JAPAN and therefore if you think it is safe then good luck to you.
Sorry I wasnt convinced. To be me APLS remains a black box solution. If is that effective, they should share it to other countries their achievements and claim Nobel peace prize.
Facility should also be opened to the Chinese, Korean or other interested scientist to investigate and allowing them to verify that the water are safe. To date, Japan says no. So how to regain that trust ?
Nobel Peace Prize? It's a simple filter not unlike my home countertop model that would also remove all radionuclide particles, but not tritium.
Seven countries have tested the water, including South Korea that you mentioned, but China refused to participate because for them it is not about health and safety, it's about propaganda.
FACTS
@@jamesluvsjam5796 It would be nice if the two of you actually looked for FACTS.
Japan invited China and other countries scientist to go over to verify, please check your source
Seven countries tested the water proving the effectiveness of ALPS.
CNA is lying when saying it is used in watches. It has been illegal in Germany and Switzerland since 1998 and tritium use in Japan is also illegal, its use in watches has been phased out due to its danger.
yet no one in world history has been harmed by tritium or tritiated water.
How efficient is ALPS? Has the treated water been analysed and if yes, where is the report? Or are you assuming that once the contaminated water is filtered, all the radioactive elements are successfully removed? Unless the Japanese Government release the report of the filtered contaminated water before it is released into the sea, I will never be convinced. Furthermore, the sea belongs to the entire human race. Japanese Government has no right to subject it to such risk. This is an irreversible process, and in years to come, when something bad happens, it's too late!
The report is not from the Japanese government. You could have read it before making such a fear mongering comment.
No independent third party verified whatever the Japanese government claimed . . . so do you trust "ownself check ownself"?
Exactly! And there are still these ridiculous ppl.out there defending their selfish act.
@@jamesluvsjam5796 What "selfish act"? All nuclear power plants have always released the same tritiated water and the full report clearly shows at least six countries have tested the water and deemed it safe.
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk Japan's release is on a much greater and vast scale. That's a big difference.
Besides, how many more countries, scientific or environment agencies have raised valid concerns but were brushed aside by Japan? Many!
I've always giving a thumbs-up for CNA's reporting quality until this episode. The host kept circling around those circumstantial evidences instead of going straight into the root cause of the dispute: the difference between the normal treated nuclear water (which have no direct contact with the radioactive chemicals) and the Fukushima's nuclear plant water that's DIRECTLY CONTACTED WITH THE RADIATIVE TRITIUM. Why couldn't CNA spend a bit more time in figuring this out first and revealing this essential piece of information to the viewers? Whether it's motivated by political or some other factors, they are just the secondary consideration if your episode's subject is to find out whether the sea water filled with the radioactive water where the seafood comes from is safe. What's making your program's quality even worse in this episode is that your point of focus seems to be only relying on those opinions which are highly prone to subjectivity, and on the so-called experts who only spoke their personal opinions without convincible fact base but only citing the already controversy-filled investigation report by the IAEA. Just so you know, the IAEA's report has never made any guarantee or endorsement for the safety of the tested nuclear water if the host or the CNA's program editor had ever read or studied the report yourself before producing this episode. More thorough and in-depth research backed by un-biased scientific evidence which can clearly demonstrate the whole leaking process and its immediate consequence is needed before the host can call for the viewers not to worry. Because essentially you are advocating viewers to buy into your poorly-argued and groundless reporting. CNA, you could have done better than just recklessly and conveniently collecting the 'He said, she said' types of sources to make such uninformed programs.
ALPS is effective in removing all but the tritium, The radionuclide that all nuclear power plants in the world have always released the same tritiated water. You could have read the analysis report for ALPS and the water before making a F 0 0 L of yourself on the internet.
👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
No need to read your whole book, you failed right away. ALPS has repeatedly proven to be effective for all but the tritium, so the water is the same as what all nuclear power plants release.
Treated water CAN be safe, IF TEPCO and Japan government do their job.
Problem is, precisely because TEPCO DID NOT DO THEIR JOB in the first place, otherwise we would not be even discussing this now!!
Not to mentioned even after the incident, we even found leakage of undiluted water. THEY FAILED TWICE!!
The real focus of this video should be on what are the processes in place to make sure water are treated properly. And whether there is a truly independent third party constantly monitoring water safety (eg IAEA being accused of receiving money from Japan).
CNA pretend that they are unbiased by only focusing on the ‘scientific’ part of the story. They only briefly mention (or didn’t mention at all) WHAT ARE THE EXACT measures and monitoring process implemented. This, in effect implicitly assumes TEPCO and Japan government will do their job.
This is completely unacceptable for a national media. What if TEPCO went broke in five years time and they didn’t have enough money to properly maintain the dilution system. Some Singaporean mother-to-be think the fish is still safe, eat them and give born to a retarded baby. Should CNA be liable to the mother?
Is it because Singapore government do not want to test all the fish from Japan, hence this video?
Your argument is so weird. Everyday there are so much waste water poured into the sea. Ask those countries that run nuclear plants.
Check out TEPCO largest shareholdings then link up the puzzle. Safe or not was nvr the focus here. Control the media then market the idea, aka brainwashing.
No one has been injured by Fukushima radiation and seven countries have tested the water showing it's safe.
Treated water will never work , instead,Japan can evaporate it , it's costly to do so , let's pollute the world.
Trust is built on multi-party testing, but Japan only disclosed its own test results and did not adopt Chinese testing agencies. Even so, a recognized third-party testing organization can regulate the quality of discharged water. Unfortunately, over time, Japan has shown significant lapses in existing emissions management, such as frequent instances of manual valves being left open. In the absence of effective oversight, such serious incidents could occur more than once, underscoring Japan's untrustworthiness in this regard.
i bet most ppl think their salmon in their sushi is from Japan, just because Sushi is a Japanese cruisine. they might be surprised to know their "salmon nigiri" sushi has nothing to do with Japan, in some outlets, they use Salmon from Chile or Norway, short grain rice from Australia..
Oem cobrand
But the seaweed is from Japan. And seaweed is a rich source of Iodine. Radioactive Iodine is found in the contaminated water. So if you eat a lot of sushi (which uses seaweed from Japan), you may have a lot of radioactive iodine in your body!
@@boonh4634 japan isnt the only source of seaweed.. top notch sushi resturants of cos use quality ingredients but i dunno about those 50cents or 60cents sushi ..Korea also export seaweed if you google which country exports most seaweed, its actually China and even Indonesia etc
Correct. Japan still produce a lot of their own rice though, but more expensive.
Japan also eats farmed salmon due to the parasites from the wild ones.
Why talking only about salmon? Ok, we dismiss salmon, isn't there other seafood export by Japan?
Eat the seafood now and see the effects years later!!!
All nuclear power plants in the world have always released the same tritiated water. Show us the 'effects' you speak of. The Japanese have a diet high in seafood and live longer than anyone on the planet.
@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunkyes good for you.not good for ocean dead fish irresponsible talking.......
@@Greg.Siucrazyforaudio2016 Show any fish on the planet that has died from Fukushima radiation.
Or how about ANY radiation.
Fail.
contaminated water dumped by Japan, that's not waste water again. everyone is not clear with the concept
Why dont we release the water near Singapore coast. I wanna see the reaction of CNA. It is safe. 😅😅😅
If the water is so clean and even drinkable as Japan has claimed, then how about pouring this "clean" water to your water utility system and let your citizens drink it? BTW: Looks like most western countries are basically silent about this. If the same thing happens on China, how would Japan (and those western countries) react? Western countries accuse China of their "uncontroilled" rocket debris threating lives and damaging environment, but allow Japan to dump radioactive water to the ocean. Double standard!
If the so-called treated water is as clean as claimed then why did they not allow verification by independent 3rd party organisation when requested? Did this so-called reporter try some fish raised in this dirty water?
W T F is independent testing to you? Six countries tested the water besides Japan.
CNA getting any financial rewards from Japan doing this?
Why? Did you find somewhere CNA lied?
CNA a propaganda medium for Japan ? Simple logic will tell you if it is safe, then use the water for agriculture.
how to water crops with seawater? u show me?
Your guess is 100% correct.
@@noob_gnek7217 never heard of desalination?
@@leexingha Desalination can be an expensive method compared to traditional sources of freshwater, primarily due to the energy required to remove salt from water and the costs associated with building and maintaining desalination plants. The expenses can vary depending on factors like the technology used, the energy source, plant location, and local labor costs.
@@tjm0112 why r u getting defensive when i just refuted the other dude that seawater can be converted into fresh water so it can be used for agriculture?
but to reply to ur statement, lets say that these treated waters are not 100% safe, imagine Japan just dumped the waters coz it wants to cut huge cost. ur very brilliant! ur argument clearly shows u r trying to defend a side but failed very miserably
Recently tons of fish found dead. Can you help us to find the details?
That was a meme started by Chinese propagandists for social media. The washed up fish was from many months before this water release and in a different sea.
Yes fishes are safe to eat for you , keep it to yourself, you can eat fish 3 meals a day , very delicious for you .@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk
It is. So is the air in the place you eat and so are you... Also I recommend avoiding any people around you they are probably also radioactive...
u should volunteer for us by making those waters ur daily drinking water
@@leexingha As long as you ship them here. On your own money. Please inform me when you have them at your backyard so I can give shipping address.
@@_Ekaros now ur all talk and chicken hahaha
@@_Ekaros Actually everything on the planet is radioactive and always has been, including all people.
Now you know why Godzilla is from Japan
You must be eight years old.
I mean... the story is based around that...
It's a good joke haha haha I can't stop laughing haha.......
@@happymck4641120% agreeded with you , sooo good love your solid fight 😂😂😂😂😂😂thanks for a good great haha......I can't help.......
28/12/23 ( Thursday ) 9.53 am. After tons of dead fishes washed up on Pacific side of Hokkaido, 1 month after this digital exclusive was released. CNA insider should have known the answer.
Fake news. The fish you meme about washed up many months before the water releases started and in an different sea.
@@ForbiddTV Just the opposite.
@@DreamyCheshire-up9rf Nope, you fell for a Chinese social media propaganda campaign. No fish in the world has died from Fukushima radiation.
I dont think that the water release is safe for ocean.
Then you obviously didn't read the report.
At the end of the day, if it is so safe, why don't these water be poured into the reservoirs in Japan so that Japanese could drink it off as normal water?
Exactly! The fact that they didn't do so speaks volumes.
Why don't your country pour treated industrial water back into the reservoir for consumption instead of throwing them into the sea?
@rbc812 We DO further treat our waste water into drinkable water. But comparing industrial water and nuclear water isn't really comparing apple to apple is it? If it was, then so many countries wouldn't be in an uproar over it. Its an undefensible move by the Japs.
@rbc812 And to clarify, I am not against Japan's move if they can assure that releasing the water is safe. The US based National Association of Marine Labs also voiced concern over Japan's lack of adequate and accurate scientific data and the long term effect this release will have on marine life and food chains. There has been inadequate radiological, ecological impact assessment on how a release on such an unprecedented vast scale would impact the ocean bed and marine life
There is also worldwide concern about the ability to monitor marine radiation levels after the release and how it would spread.
Japan should have continued working with the agencies and her neighbours to assure the world that it is safe, or concerned other alternatives, instead of brushing aside concerns and proceeding unilaterally.
@@jamesluvsjam5796 International Atomic Energy Agency had confirmed the waste water is safe. I can even accuse all the nuclear wastewater from all nuclear plants are not safe, will you agree then?
I got news for you. Food that contains potasium is usually naturally radioactive so bananas, nuts, avocados, potatoes, beans, carrots, red meat, etc. The question is not if the food radioactive/not. Rather question the safety of radioactivity in the food itself.
All food has always been radioactive, in fact everything on the planet is and always has been radioactive.
If the water was really safe, Japan should have kept it for their own consumption and usage, or treat it further before using it themselves. The fact that they didnt do so, and chose to release it into the ocean, tells us everything we need to know.
It's either you are only a half wit, or you wanted your own version of narration. The ocean will further dilute the radioactive tritium, which other nuclear facilities in the neighbouring countries do the same anyway.
Your argument is weird. If your argument holds, then Singapore should not release treated water into the sea. Singapore should keep it for internal consumption. This applies every country in the world.
@rbc812 Comparing industrial water to nuclear water is ridiculous. There is obviously a great concern about Japan's selfish act and that's why so many of her neighbours are so upset. Totally indefensible move.
@rbc812 And to clarify, I am not against Japan's move if they can assure that releasing the water is safe. The US based National Association of Marine Labs also voiced concern over Japan's lack of adequate and accurate scientific data and the long term effect this release will have on marine life and food chains. There has been inadequate radiological, ecological impact assessment on how a release on such an unprecedented vast scale would impact the ocean bed and marine life
There is also worldwide concern about the ability to monitor marine radiation levels after the release and how it would spread.
Japan should have continued working with the agencies and her neighbours to assure the world that it is safe, or concerned other alternatives, instead of brushing aside concerns and proceeding unilaterally.
@@jamesluvsjam5796 pls do not ignore the fact everyday there are so much radioactive water poured into the sea by so many countries. do you have the data to show that industrial waste water is less harmful even though it is not treated?
Why isn’t the treated (tritium) water used in industry in lieu of or before releasing directing into the ocean? ei cooling machinery (in manufacturing plants), hydroelectric generation, transportation…
What she really meant on 4:18, "Countries like the US, UK, and Japan sucks each other off."
Also, this channel cut be officially renamed as CNA balls sucker
since its deemed to be safe, why channel it out into the sea and not channel it to potable water for its own consumption?
because they were seawater used for cooling in the first place...
omg go google
Because it is next to the sea and building pipes and pumps to anywhere from there is just stupid waste of money...
@@noob_gnek7217doesn mean have to go back to the sea, and thats not my pt...nothing gotta do w googling pls.
u drink seawater? So power? Use some brains
@@ysngngys7753 do you drink seawater directly? how to channel seawater to potable water? pls look up online before speaking.
Fish from Japan.... Horror 🤢🤢🤢
if there is no Godzilla, then shld be safe i guess
Are you 10 years old?
acha acha india is back😂😂
its easy, why not drink those waters themselves then we see after a year or so if no mutation occurs
Then you should drink the tritiated water your country releases.
The issue is different experts have different opinions as we saw in Covid and as this isn’t something that’s tested or human studies . We can’t accurately say for sure the long term results
We most certainly can. All nuclear power plants in the world have always released the same tritiated water since the 1950's.
These poor people. They're all going to glow in the dark like my watch.
Do you believe it he ate sushi from that area ?
Fed up with all comments yelling to use waste water in fields. These guys dont desalinate or use it in agriculture but release all into the ocean
Fun facts; Japan import mackerel from Norway for local consumption and export their local catch.
As a Singaporean i dont really care i just eat any food even Japanese food i dont really give a f if its nuclear or not.
That sounds racist.
That seems super super healthy, you are the most healthiest person in the world after eating so much Japanese fish , l guess you love it so so much 😂😂..........
china already ban
So did Russia.
@@8spores And both for political purposes, not health or safety.
The world zero fish export.
I only believe Patrick Martin if Patrick Martin records himself catching a Fukishima fish then eating it immediately. Im pretty sure he wouldnt eat it
Compared to food items from China, I'd much rather eat seafood from Japan.
What rubbish! no one knows the long term impact and consequences
Sure we do since tritium has been all over the world since the beginning of time, and all nuclear power plants in the world have always released the same tritiated water.
kosher certified
Wondering how they know its safe? Did they reach conclusion by putting live squids, fishes, tuna, scallops into treated radioactive water?
They did actually raise some flounders and abalone in the tritium water.
@@fathurrochman2469 And all died . . . but that's not supposed to be leaked out anyway and they published it as safe.
@@rogerfaint499where did you get your source, please don't just spread fake news because you hate Japan. It's your problem.
@@biaofo5258try to eat more Japanese fish yourself, that's more solid to prove that your arguments, but others still refuse to eat toxic fish from Japan.
Japanese Fish are healthy for you.Good fish for sure , I'm on your side 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂..........
Tritium is not natural in nature in any large amounts.
Tritium is dangerous at genetic levels and creates mutant babies!
can trust anything scientists say after the pandemic...
To know if it is…make a trip to Bikini Island Atoll in the south pacific, take samples of sea life and test them for generational Radioactive Exposure post NATO Nuclear bomb testings 50-60!years ago…
A lot of people still travel to japan for holidays tho 🤣 and eating the seafood from japan as well
Australian don't know much about its nuclear toxic water releasing into ocean for 30 years. I told them they're in shock.not many media tells to the public.
And the views of this video is 29k😂 now I see
You eat you die.
We all eat and we all die, but not from Fukushima radiation.
Yes. If your fish comes from China.
Cheaper sushi!
The PM of Japan ate the fish on camera only after they tested it for radiation.
And the fish was specially imported from Norway . . . . that tells us a lot.
@@rogerfaint499 Wow, did you make that up yourself?
Don't be silly, he didn't eat Japanese fish, they are imported, that was a show only, local people not buying fish , it's telling the truth from their citizens.
🤣🤣🤣 remember NEVER to trust those promises‼️😒😒😒
Who cares if the water is treated or not, where are the missing cores?
Much of it is melted to the bottom of the containment vessel. That's why no one died from Fukushima radiation.
If the treated water has negligible impact to environment and human health, just consume within Japan for construction, irrigation and all other water related national activities, why rush to go to the sea? All excuses and scientific analysis from here sounds silly and ridiculous. All the essential points are avoided in the video and some unimportant/unrelated stuff are amplified in the video. Even the reason and the statements that Japan provides is not persuasive and are full of loopholes, but CNA analyses and justify in the video. Japan said they had no money to deal with so-called treated water and soon after which they bought another land again in Brazil. :) There are documentaries interviewing residents in Fukushima, which evidences that Japan government never actually placed any action for protecting the island and whole world from the explosion, and they still claims they had everything in control and even filmed movie to tell a fake story and fake Japan's hero image in the explosion. Anyway, nuclear waster into the sea is not recent news, no even Japan or the country behind Japan did so, developed countries are all in the environment sacrifice from long long ago. Environment risk is yes, human health risk is also yes, trust your common sense. Media is the trumpet belonging to the capital and the power class.
Then you should do the same in your country for the tritiated water your country releases.
Conclusion : Probably safe. . .
But the Japanese government refused to have those water as normal drinking water for the Japanese. They just want to release it into the seas, so that others will get contaminated, too . . .
In this world of fake news. Singaporean news source is among the few that I can still believe.😢
China not buy Japan fish.... Smart move
If the water is so clean and even drinkable as Japan has claimed, then how about pouring this "clean" water to your water utility system and let your citizens drink it? BTW: Looks like most western countries are basically silent about this. If the same thing happens on China, how would Japan (and those western countries) react? Western countries accuse China of their "uncontroilled" rocket debris threating lives and damaging environment, but allow Japan to dump radioactive water to the ocean. Double standard!
Good reporting job, CNA. I can definitely see Singaporeans rushing for cheap sushi from Japan. Must kiasu.. they dowan eat we eat hor!
in couple year... singaporean body will glow in the dark 🤣🤣🤣
US /Japan bot
I mean...if we tested the fish, and they are normal...and people still complaint about it, then that's their own stupid fault.
it released in years...not just 1 time...only in long time we know for sure if inded real safe or not
@@user-ht8hk5eg7j Obviously you did not watch the report. The sea water has higher tritium than the treated water. Can you connect the dots?
You can have all the Japanese fish free eat them daily for improve your health, super healthy fish for you 3 fish meals daily, you will grow special, very special....... congratulations......
@@user-ht8hk5eg7j Except you clearly did not watch the whole thing. The ocean has a higher level to tritium than the water it released. So, done.
CONTAMINATED PART OF TREATED WATER HAS TO GO SOME WHERE.
In the end, the Earth ocean would be "enriched".
if its so safe use it as their own drinking water, swimming pools, and what not. even the Japanese locals are dubious of the govt. all these scientists and experts are not the one that are affected, and can therefore issue irresponsible comments to the rest of the world. i dare these people to stay, eat, drink for the next few decades there. and CNS Insider, you reply on controversial reports for your reporting, seriously ????
Then you should drink the tritiated water your country releases as a demonstration to the rest of the world.
Initially I thought only Japan is doing it. Then I found out other nuclear plants have been doing the same for decades 😅.
They are different. The waste water from Fukushima nuclear plant passed through nuclear waste. While other nuclear plants did not have direct contact with nuclear material.
@@kcchiew4247 good to know this, but I do suspect there may b small leakage happening here n thr with cover up from their govn from time to time
That being said, most of the chemicals have been removed, except for tritium which have levels much lower than many countries/reactors around the world.
@@nicholasthope If it is safe, use as drinking water.
Ya. China’s nuclear treated water are actually many times higher along its coast. Why else do you think they are encroaching other countries’ waters and expanding their influence out of their own territorial waters? They polluted their own coasts so they have no choice but to encroach and try to claim other seas as theirs.
Classic PR stunt showing Kishidia and his henchmen eating teishouku. Today's communications landscape has drastically changed. Modern consumers are not 100% susceptible to such stunts. We trust Yoshizawa's version of events than Kishida and TEPCO's "PR" team's. An international Human Rights or Consumers Rights Watch along with "globally sanctioned" presses like Aljazeera News need to test the waters around Fukushima and the results published. This concerns food safety; politicians' voices and powers can be swept aside or under the rug.
Seven countries have tested the water even before it hit the sea.
China 🇨🇳 is alone in this Fukushima protest.
- This is not about safety or science, but about hate.
RIP to you
study more, foolish
then go buy japan fish and eat for year...i dare u
@@user-ht8hk5eg7jThis dumb Chinese narrative doesn't work anymore.
Well you have to eat Japanese fish daily , that is more solid support about the safety you believe in , l fully support you eating Japanese fish 3 meals a day for 30+ years , l believed that you believed it's healthy super super healthy for yourself, you deserved it , no problem at all😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.............
Yes, continue to reach out for Japanese produce, feed the kids and eldetly. Perhaps put the young, our future man and woman, who cannot reproduce at, unknown risks. Whose to blame if it was indeed Tritium? 20 yrs would have pass, blame who then? TEPCO? Blame your own decision and greed.
Pour the wastewater for the world to share, for they've had their share too in the past.
No one in world history has ever been harmed by tritiated water, and all nuclear power plants release it. So does nature.
bahaya sekali makanan jepang
ya pasti lah bahaya lah cuma yg cinta jepang ajah percaya makanan laut jepang aman 😂😂😂😂
it could have been buried underground and forgotten, however, the Janapese corporations would not sacrifice their land and choose to pollute the whole world. The Japanese should demonstrate how safe tritium waste water is by drinking it. So does the CNA reporter
While i agree with the first point, the second one is just dumb. Many chemicals are safe to be dumped in the oceans, but will kill you if you drink it directly. Its all about concentration
U know there are in this predicament because of an earthquake right? And your suggestion is to bury it in the ground.
This doesn't make any sense. Other countries also dump their radioactive waste to the sea. Should they drink the water too?
@@fathurrochman2469Other countries don't dump radioactive contaminated water like Japan. Please know the difference between radioactive cooling waste water vs radioactive contaminated water.
@@huei5605Both are being thrown away in the sea. Hence according to the op’s standard both should be safe to drink.
For the Japan haters out there, if Tritium water released by Japan is a threat, wait till you know about the number of nuclear water waste from China that is 1000x more in volume, but undisclosed information from Chinese government on their treatment.
Even France as the current number 1 on nuclear water waste cause no concern in Europe, and they are being transparent
You may not know the difference between nuclear waste water and nuclear sewage
I'm not a Japan hater, I just don't want to consume anything that the Japanese themselves consider untrustworthy. You, on the other hand, are clearly a Chinese hater. So, feel free to consume your fish, perhaps it can eventually turn you into a Japanese you like so much
@@xutiger556 And it's apparent that you certainly do not.
A lonely frog at the very bottom of a well pity.....very pity it's Chinese you may not get it , but most people know that.
Singapore is getting some kickback from Japan and its American ally now?
So telling the truth means there are kickbacks involved?
singaporea is american ally... just see their shiny f35
@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk that's not the truth. the truth is, no matter how safe it is, it all comes down to having someone else's garbage dumped in common area, forcing others to take a risk, just so Japan can save money. You might be willing, others are not
@@japjungho4645 Show where I haven't told the truth. Your country doesn't pollute? All nuclear power plants have always released the same tritiated water and nothing in world history has ever been harmed by this practice. Tritium is produced in nature in larger quantities the man does and you won't be able to find anyone in world history that has been harmed by nature's pollution either.
If you don't want to understand the world opinion with open minded, suggest you to go back to your CCTV and Chinese media.
Shame on you CNA. If the water is sooooo SAFE, why release it into the sea? Just use it within the country!!
Then you should use the tritiated water your country produces within your country.
Cna for once have the gut not to follow propaganda blindly.
I hv no problem with Japanese seafood
I still eat sushi and fresh yellowtail tuna.😊😊😊😊
You may have , no must have put up so much weight and don't swell take care........
CNA pls dont kill Singaporean 🙏
If the ALPS are effective, Japan should be able to use it as source of drinking water. Not to dispose in sea.
Why? It is next to sea on very low level. There is really not much demand around there. And it does not magically flow uphill... A basic fact that those fearful of it don't understand either... The sea is basically next to it and it is the simplest and least wasteful place to dump it...
@@_Ekaros Come on. Since the accident 12 years ago, underground water and rain are continually use to cool the melted fuel and fuel debris. Why need to create another system to pump sea water for ALPS ? Why not using the same underground water system for dilution? If it is safe for drinking, why dump it into the sea?
@@kcchiew4247 All nuclear power plants release the same tritiated water and they don't pump it underground as per your meme.
@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk The contaminated water generated by Fukushima nuclear plant has come into direct contact from the debris of melted down cores. Not appropriate to compare wastewater for normal operating nuclear plants in general. (And Fukushima nuclear plant did use underground water to cool the melted down cores. Please search on internet)
@@kcchiew4247 The full report clearly shows ALPS is effective in removing all but the tritium, so the water is the same as what all NPP releases.
Have stop eating any Japanese seafood ever since they release it to the sea.
Then you never should have eaten seafood in your entire life. All nuclear power plants have always released the same tritiated water.
G7 countries, including Japan 🇯🇵, are looking for measures to respond collectively to *China's old habit of economic coercion.*
The question would be why Japan bans advanced semiconductor equipment and materials from export to China ?
Japan can't give an straight answer without resorting to vague "national security" blah..blah..blah..
So, China is just returning the favor.....
No point talking on how safe is fish caught off japan seas. Better be safe than sorry. I rather not eat it then later in life suffering from its radioactive found in those fishes. Singapore govt is not going to TEST EVERY FISH IMPORTED FROM JAPAN and therefore if you think it is safe then good luck to you.
Then you never should have eaten fish in your entire life. All nuclear power plants have always released the same tritiated water.
Don’t biased la, if concentration low why not japan use the water themselves you didn’t say?
All japanese have to drink that waste water ~~
Really? And you drink seawater?
india is you😂😂😂
This is so typically kiasi 🫣