I expected to see Aqqoyunlu, Qaraqoyunlus on Eastern Anatolia. It would be good if you added them. Most of them was Nomadic Turcomans. Later some of it converted to Shia and migrated to todays South Azerbaijan under Safavid Rule, Others stayed as Sunni and migrated to Western Anatolia via Ottoman Policies on 18th century. Anyways thats actually a great video keep it up brother!
@@limonya видимо у них нет тюркских аутосом просто, да и гаплотипов изначальных тюрок типа N1b2 у азербайджанцев мало (зато были у бакинских ханов) и у малочисленных потомков сельджуков в Турции как Денишмениды . Гены персов греков курдов и талышей и армян всё вымыли.
The word Tiele is a distorted Chinese spelling of the word Türk, who are the ancestors of the Uyghurs. They were also known in Chinese sources as Tingling In Latin sources, they were mentioned as the Torcilingi and Torci people. Because of the height of their chariots, they were called Gaoche people, meaning "those of high chariots." you dealt with these people as if they were several peoples. As for the Göktürks, they were the descendants of the southern Xiongnu.
Xuinu is also a distorted way of saying Hunu. Group names for peoples the chinese encountered in antiquity make a lot more sense if read in classical chinese rather than modern madarin.
@@anyarasan8529 The first unmistakable evidence of Turkic history begins with the Huns/Xiongnu. There are theories about civilizations that preceded this, but there are not yet enough archaeological findings to provide convincing proof that these people were Turkic or that the confederations were governed by a Turkic ruling class, as in other confederations. However, the Huns have now become unmistakable with all the evidence: The names of Xiongnu and Western Hun leaders are almost indisputably Turkic. Additionally, there are other findings that strengthen this connection. Khan Dikkiz (Dengizich - Deniz) Dish/Plate A dish with runes was translated with the following text: Kinkeg Dikkiz ükü kässä Kiji sax sax saxynil gür Tänrig Translation: "Fear the blow of King Dikkiz the Wise! Retreat to the God beyond this world!" Sura Rune Inscription Another inscription, attributed to the Xiongnu/Huns, reads as follows: (i)g känč : ap(a) kurčik : sal aranģï : eenč uğ(a) Translation: "Ah young Apa Kurčik, let yourself rest in peaceful sleep in the coffin/burial / rest in peaceful sleep in the coffin/burial!" Chinese Historical Mention A Chinese historian noted the following words he heard in the Xiongnu language. In 329 CE, a Xiongnu leader asked Fo-t’u-teng for help regarding an upcoming battle against Liu Yao. After a ritual, he spoke a prophecy in the Ho language: siu-k’i t’i-li-kang puh-koh kü-t’u-tang Interpretation: "The army will march and capture Liu Yao." Meaning of the terms: siu-k’i: "army" t’i-li-kang: "march" puh-koh: "Liu Yao" (his title) kü-t’u-tang: "capture" Transcriptions by Sinologists Bernhard Karlgren: siog tieg t’iei lied kang b’uok kuk g’iu t’uk-tang Edwin G. Pulleyblank: sux-keh the-let-kang buk-kok goh-thok-tang Turkic Reconstructions G.J. Ramstedt: Süke talıkıng (talıkang) bügüg (ügeg) tutang - "Go to war, capture the enemy leader!" Talat Tekin: Sü:ke tılıkang bugukgı tuktang - "Go to war, capture Buguk (the leader)." Significance This expression represents one of the earliest known examples of a Turkic language and provides valuable insight into the linguistic and cultural interactions between the Xiongnu and Chinese civilizations. Xiongnu and Turkic Connections Similarities in Runes The runes of the Xiongnu are nearly identical to the Göktürk runic script. Mentions in Chinese Sources Book of Jin: Mentions 19 Southern Xiongnu tribes who entered Former Yan, the 14th of which was the Alat (Ch. 賀賴 Helai ~ 賀蘭 Helan ~ 曷剌 Hela). Alat translates to "pinto horse" (Ch. 駁馬 ~ 駮馬 Boma) in Old Turkic. Book of Zhou, History of the Northern Dynasties, Tongdian, New Book of Tang: Mention that the Göktürks and the ruling Ashina clan were part of the Xiongnu confederation. Uyghur Khagans: Claimed descent from the Xiongnu. Book of Wei: States that the Yueban descended from the Northern Xiongnu and that their language and customs were similar to those of the Tiele. Names and Meanings Alat (Turkic: Ala or Alagchin): Means "pinto horse." This tribal name appears in both Chinese annals and later Turkic tribes. The Xiongnu referred to heaven (天): Chēnglí (擇犁), a Chinese transcription of Tengri. Ruling Clans Luandi/Xulianti Clan: This was the ruling clan of the Xiongnu from the 3rd century BCE to the 4th century CE. The word Luandi comes from the Chinese Book of Han, while Xulianti is from the Book of Later Han. Chinese researchers reconstruct Old Chinese Luandi as Hala-yundluğ, meaning "tribe with pinto horses" in an early Turkic dialect. Further Details Lanhai Wei and Hui Li: Reconstruct the Old Chinese pronunciation of 挛鞮 as lyuan-tlïɣ, originating from an earlier form 虚连题 (Hala-yundluɣ). This resulted from a historical sound shift where h- disappeared. The roots hala (colorful), yund (horse), and the participle suffix -luɣ combined to mean "tribe with pinto horses" in an early Turkic dialect. This can be identified with the historical Ulayundluğ tribe (ALAT TRIBE). The conquest of the same clan by the Xue in the 4th century CE led to the Xueyantuo. The Xueyantuo were an ancient Tiele tribe and khanate in Northeast Asia. They were once vassals of the Göktürks but later allied with the Tang dynasty against the Eastern Göktürks. Alat Tribe The Alat tribe (also known as Ala-at, Ala, Alachin, Alagchin, Alchin, Alchi, Alayontli, Ulayundluğ, meaning "pinto horse" or "spotted horse"). Chinese names include Boma 駁馬 or 駮馬, Helai 賀賴, Helan 賀蘭, Hela 曷剌, and Bila 弊剌. In the old Turkic lexicon, the meaning of "pinto horse" is expressed with terms such as ala or alagchin, which are still used in compound expressions today. The Tang Huiyao mentions a tribe named Geluozhiya (葛羅枝牙) directly after the Ashina tribe, with a tamga that was later also found among the Oghuz tribe. Since the Oghuz (Turkmen) tribe of Alayontli has the same tamga as the Boma (Alat) tribe, and the name also translates to "pinto horse," Zuev is convinced that Alayontli is the same tribe as Alat. Conclusion The evidence that the Xiongnu leaders were of Turkic origin is overwhelming. Their language, runes, religious terms, and the connections with later Turkic tribes such as the Göktürks and Oghuz support this conclusion. According to Chinese historians, there is no doubt about the origin of the Xiongnu; only Western historians have proposed alternative theories, which are becoming increasingly untenable. In several Chinese sources, it is also mentioned that "Chanyu," the title for the Xiongnu leaders, was also given to later Tujue (Turkic) leaders. "Chanyu" is sometimes transcribed as "Tarkan." The full title is Chengli Gutu Chanyu = Tengri Çocuğu Tarkan. This means "Son of god/heaven _[INSERT NAME]_ (Tar)khan. A new Turkic stone was found of the gökturk empire by the way and it word for word contains the title "son of god/heaven". The Xiongnu empire had a military structure that showed many similarities with later Turkic and Mongolian armies. Their army was organized in a hierarchical system with different divisions: Tuqi Kings (Wise Kings) of Left and Right: Directly under the Leader, these kings governed the left (eastern) and right (western) wings of the empire. The Tuqi King of the Left Wing was usually the heir apparent. The word Tuqi is a direct translation of the Turkic (j)ükü, meaning "wise," which literally reflects the Chinese concept of "wise prince." Guli (Ku-li) and Military Commanders: Officials who oversaw military operations, with counterparts on both the left and right sides. The term Guli (Ku-li) is related to the Turkic word Kolu, meaning "arms" or "wings" of the army, referring to a military division or branch of the forces.
Fun fact: Most of the tribes shown in video has no DNA samples taken from them. But ofc when it comes to Turk peoples it has an "Turkicmeter". Yet no IE discussions has such a teatment. Plus, Khazars have %0 Turkic DNA? what?
Data on many ancient Turkic populations, due to lack of genetic data or due to their diversity within the population, are taken mainly at the expense of modern populations. Data from the remains of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the Kharkov region belonging to the Khazars show identity with the Caucasian Alans. media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg And by the way I have IEmeter
@@yakutia159he is belarus, And in general, this is nonsense, the history of the Turks is so much rewritten and distorted, making the Turks Bulgars, Khazars, Huns, and others not Turks, without recognizing that during the guns and the domination of the Turkic Khaganates, the common Turkic language was like English for Asia. Now all Turks are divided, calling them Turkicized, making stupid arguments, calling them not Turks.
@@aruuito it was distorted so much deeper than you imagine. Huns were like the third Turkic conquest of Europe, Avars were the fourth (and they are rewriting even those facst). Yamnaya is the first Turkic conquest of Europe.
Turkey is wrong according to the map which is based on "Turkic ancestry" Which sample of Turkic dna results did you use? For example, some DNA sample results show that Xiongnu samples had %60-70 east asian and siberian(Dodecad k12b), Gokturks had around %80 and medieval Turks(Kara-khanid) had around %45. So, Modern Turks in Turkey has %8-22 which is changeable from region to region. So, Middle-North Black Sea region should be higher in color and western Turkey must be higher than central and eastern anatolia. According to medieval Turkic results, Turks in Turkey must be %25-50 based on regions. Except those, Thanks for the video, i really liked it.
My mistake by the way, I only based the results on "east asian and siberian" There are other things in a DNA test(gedrosia,north european etc.) But generally two things i mentioned is mostly used for the results to compare.
Samsar47, sen samsar değil tam bir Kürtçü sansar olmalısın.imal ettiğin ima'lı önermelerden, zihninin gerisinden nasıl bir Kürtçülük parıltısı geçtiği okunabiliyor. video-yapımcısı şöyle deseydi eminim ki çok sevinirdin: "Türkiye de hiç Türk yoktur, bütün Türkiye Türkleri aslında Kürt'tür."
نسبة أتراك في تركيا أقل من 2٪ .... 96٪ من سكان جمهورية تركيا مزيفة هم يونانين و أرمن و أكراد و عرب تم تتريكهم ...... و للمعلومة لغة تركية لجمهورية تركيا هي لغة هجينة خليط من لغة عربية و فارسية
Amazing how Mongols are more Turkic than a lot of modern Turkic nations. But it is no wonder on a second thought because Mongolia was where the proto Turks originated.
Exactly mongols except kalmyks didn't really didn't move any were else TURKIC PEOPLE on the udder hand did This is way you will find TURKIC spiking people from Siberia to Europe all the way to Africa
The population of the Mongols is 3 million today. The population of the Turks is 200 million. The Mongols were never very populous. The power of Genghis Khan comes from the Turks because Genghis Khan is related to the Turks and the Mongols. Mongolia is not where the Turks come from. The place where the Turks come from is Siberia, not Mongolia Turks lived in China, Mongalia, India, Pakistan, Iran and many other countries, but their place of origin is Siberian Altai.
Can you comment the exact Proto-Turkic ancestry percentage of Central Asian Turks (Qazaqs, Uzbeks, Kirghizs, Turkmens, Karakalpaks, Tuvans and Uighurs) Volgan Turks (Bashkirs, Siberian Tatars, Volga Tatars and Chuvash), and Mongolic-speaking people?
This is the earliest detailed names of the peoples of the region and they are from Russian Primary Chronicle. Most of these peoples are not on the English Wikipedia, but are on the Russian Wikipedia. Here is their Russian name: Сумь, Емь, Чудь.
Uyghurs were the first to be annexed by the Turks. But these people are composed of many tribes. Some are willing, while others always launch rebellions. The Chinese emperor supported those who insisted on independence and then defeated the Turks. Then the Uyghurs reestablished a state that was subservient to China. When they wanted to betray the Chinese emperor, the emperor sent troops to destroy his tribe. One of the Uyghur generals had been helping the Chinese emperor in war, and eventually left with his tribe to become a vassal of the Turks when China was declining. Finally, due to internal turmoil among the Turks, China joined forces with them to annihilate them. They established their own country and brought their former allies to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. These people who were driven away by them surrendered to the Arabs again. Later, due to the internal turmoil among the Uyghur people, the country they established was destroyed by the Kyrgyz people. But Kyrgyz people cannot control the tribes in this area.
China joined forces with Uyghurs and Qarluq people to eliminate the Turkic state. Uyghurs established their own country and drove their former allies to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. These Qarluq people who were driven away by them surrendered to the Arabs again. Later, due to internal turmoil among the Uyghur people, the country they established was destroyed by the Kyrgyz people. But Kyrgyz people cannot control the tribes in the region
The elite of the Avar Kaganate from the 8th to 9th centuries shows the emergence of a new genetic component associated with the North Caucasus, apparently from the Bulgars. Moreover, this component lacks East Asian origin. Article: Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs2.jpg ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg In addition, samples from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the 8th to 10th centuries in the Kharkov region, apparently belonging to the Khazars, show the identity to the North Caucasians. media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg Also, my calculations on Vahaduo about Balkan populations show the absence of East Asian ancestry not from Turkish, but a good presence of ancestry from the North Caucasus. Albanian Chechen Kazakh Slovakian Turkish_Antalya Gagauz 66.5 9.8 0.2 19.5 4.1
Bulgarian 60.9 4.9 0.3 30.4 3.4 Macedonian 66.6 1.9 0.0 31.5 0.0 Serbian 49.9 2.2 0.2 47.5 0.3 Also, non-Fino-Ugric East Asian ancestry is absent among the populations of the Volga Bulgaria region which were not influenced by the Kipchaks. Chechen Erzya Kazakh Mansi Chuvash 6.5 57.6 1.3 34.6 Udmurt 10.7 48.2 0.0 41.1 Mari 1.7 49.2 0.0 49.2 Tatar_Kazan 13.0 59.8 13.8 13.4
@@The_Geographer_Maps it's known for a fact that Khazars ADOPTED the Saltovo-Mayaki culture, they were NOT their descendants. Plus how exactly did Ding-Ling people had %0 Turkic? The Chinese sources do not differentiate them from Han Chinese by appearance. Also, the *New Book* written by old Chinese historians say that they intermarried with Yenisei Kirghizs which proves that they got their Indo-European influence later.
@@The_Geographer_Maps ⬇️ Hun-Avar-Hungarian genetic article Summary: 265 ancient samples have been analyzed successive migration waves of populations related to Huns - Avars and Magyars from Asia to Europe... (the reasons for the large number of haplogroup R1 holders in Europe) Most people (maximum 1.5 thousand years ago) ... their ancestors were inside Europe (maximum 3.2 thousand years ago) (but they have Asian origin, which indicates the migration of people carrying haplogroup R1 to Europe) The Huns inside Europe have the origin of East Asia Huns and Avars have the same ancestry In the samples, the genome related to Iranic populations is not found, and their initial migration was from East Asia, probably modern Mongolia Huns - Avars and Magyars carry the haplogroup R1a-Z94 (the same haplogroup that was discovered in the Scythians) pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35617951/ ⬇️ Avars genetic essay The Avars were a branch of the Ughurs, which itself is a Turkic-speaking ethnic group Most of them were Turkic-speaking peoples, such as Utigor-Kutrigor or Unughor, who are called Bulgarians in the writings The word Bulghar is a Turkic word, but the population that has this name probably has nothing to do with Turkics, and it is more likely that there are some ethnic Turkics in this population www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00267-7 These are more authentic academic articles and sources than your nonsense, I'll post the sources again if needed. Based on genetics and subgroups, they were also strongly related to eastern Turkic tribes, I'm not sure if you've looked at the Y haplogroups between Turkics peoples. Your sources only categorize Turkics as East Eurasian and Mongoloid without any logical and valid reasons
I'm glad you haven't forgotten about us, Saha. But we cannot be only 40% Turks., we take our history back to shortly before the 6th century. According to any Diagrams of Turkic families, I mean ANY diagrams, we are included as the second oldest living Turks after the Chuvash, who are from the Bulgarian branch(You can see it in the language too). The Kurykans lived in the 6th - 11th centuries, and before him we had common Turkic-Mongolic tribes like a Batyly, Khatygyn, Chordu, Baydy, Amydai etc. In our language, 47% (half) are Turkic, 27% Mongolian, 6% common Turkic-Mongolian, 10% Tungusic-Manchu, 10%(≈9,7%) of unknown origin. Among 47% of Turkic part: 26% Ancient Turkic, 53% Medieval Turkic, 21% Modern Turkic. Our genetics also stands out for its age. I mean even the Mongols himself are MORE TURKIC than us??? Like WTF???? So 40% is too incorrect.
Correction: Pakistan has over 2 million Hazaras who are Turko-Mongols. Quetta, Bolachistan has entire neighbourhoods. Hazara Town, Mariabad are Hazara dominant with some of then found in Islamabad. You should have shown Hazaras living in Bolachistan with a 'blob' !!!
Genomes from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the Kharkov region that belong to the Khazars show the identity to modern North Caucasians. media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg In addition, the genomes of the Late Avar elite of the Danube show a component associated with the North Caucasians. ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg Also, modern descendants of the Volga Bulgars and especially the Kazan Tatars show admixture from the North Caucasus. Bulgarians, Romanians and especially Gagauzians also show admixture associated with the North Caucasus i.imgur.com/bYBQ9cy.png
@@Raidon8537 Yüzde 1 bile Türk değil Bulgarlar. Yunan ve Slav karışımı, Slav toplumudur. Bulgar kabileleri antik dönemde oraya isimlerini vermişler. İnsanların o isim ile hiç bir alakaları yok. Bulgarlar Slav halkıdır.
Proto Bulgarians are of Turkic origin, my friend. The name of Kubrat Khan is a Turkish name and is even mentioned in the Orkhon inscriptions of the Gokturks. Byzantine historian Theophanes calls the great Bulgarian state "patria onoguria". Onogurs are a Turkish tribe. This symbol, used by the Proto-Bulgarians (IYI), was also used by the Turkish Kayı tribe and the Bulgarian Dulo dynasty. and among the ancient Bulgarian gods there is a god called tangra or taagra. In Turks, he has a name similar to the god named Tengri. Evidence of Tangra includes the Madara Column, preserved at the National Archaeological Institute, which has a museum in Sofia. It bears a half-erased ancient Greek inscription reading Tangra - TAGGRA ("GG" pronounced "NG" in Greek). As a matter of fact, Nikepheros (Byzantine Emperor M.G.) stated that Kubrat, the founder of the Great Bulgarian State, was the "lord of the Onogurs". I mentioned above that the Onogurs are a Turkish tribe. As additional historical evidence, Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos (4th emperor of the Macedonian Dynasty, reigned 913-959, M.G.) recorded that the Bulgarians called themselves Onogur Bulgarians.” We call the old Bulgarians Turks. When the Proto Bulgarians came to today's Balkans, they established a common state with seven Slavic tribes. but peoples of Slavic and Thracian origin. Their numbers were greater than the proto-Bulgarian population, and Turkic Bulgarians assimilated among them over time.
@First of all, Bulgarians never used the title “Khan” and there is no evidence of such, every single inscription mentions the Bulgar title “Kanasubigi” meaning “Ruler by God”. Secondly there is no evidence to support bulgars were tengrist. The only “evidence” is a mostly destroyed unintelligible carving which some people assume would say Tangra, which is highly unreliable. The names were also of Iranic origin/Scythian, not Turkic,and another example would be Kanasubigi Krum. The first ever recorded uses of the “IYI” symbol have been found in ancient Thracian carvings that long predate the Turkic migrations as well as the Kayi tribe, and it is literally identical to the symbol used by the bulgars. Lastly and arguably the most important point is the genetic studies on bulgars. The genetic studies show that bulgars have absolutely no eastern Eurasian origins specifically the Altai mountains. Instead it links directly to western Eurasian origins which would be Indo Europeans (Scythians), places like the Pontic Caspian steppe for example. Keep in mind all of this is said in relation to the period before the Turkic migrations. The only argument really left would be the distant form of Turkic language the bulgars temporarily spoke which is another discussion. To conclude, realistically the origin of the Bulgars is Scythian.
@@The_Big_G_765Kanas u bigi or kanas ubigi is a title of Turkish origin. The names Kan, Khan, kagan, kahan come from the same origin. This title can also be given to state administrators, tribal leaders or lower-ranking administrators, and the word bigi is Turkish. It has the same phonetic sequence as the words Bey, Beğ, bek, beg, atabeg. There are also words sü bigi and sü basi in Turkish, meaning army commander and military leader. While you reject my claim of tangra as a falsified inscription, why can't you respond to the onogurous findings of the historians of that period? When you can't answer, you resort to the evasive excuse that it was falsified? It has the title İçhirgu Çila. *iç" is a word of Altai origin. For example, he has the title kavhan and kavkhan. It is mentioned even in the Orhun inscriptions of the Göktürks. He is a first-degree civil servant. You couldn't produce any evidence that the titles are of Iranian origin? By saying Scythian, you will prove that it is not just Scythian. Onogurs were one of the important elements in the establishment of both the Great Bulgarian and Danube Bulgarian states. As a matter of fact, Nikepheros (Byzantine Emperor, M.G.) stated that Kubrat, the founder of the Great Bulgarian State, was the "lord of the Onogurs". The Byzantine emperor says, do you not accept this? The Byzantine historian named Theophanes says that the khan kubrat was the ruler of "Patria onoguria (the land of onogur)". Theophanes is a court historian who personally saw the kubrat alive. Couldn't you answer these? These are primary sources and give important clues, but you couldn't say anything about them? Because it was true. You couldn't refuse. There is no tamga of the Dulo dynasty in Thracian carvings, which is an unfounded statement. (IYI) This symbol exists in the Kayi tribe and the Dulo dynasty. It is a Turkish symbol. And Bulgarian names are of Turkish origin. The name Kubrat is mentioned in Orkhon inscriptions, and I even write the expression (YORuYOR: TİYIN: KÜ: eŞiDiP: BALIKDaKI: TaGIKMİŞ: TaGDakI: İNMiŞ: TIRiLiP: YeTMiŞ: eR: BOLMIŞ: TeŊRİ: KÜÇ: BİRTÜK: ÜÇiN: KaŊım: KaGaN: SÜSİ: BÖRİ: TeG: eRMiŞ: YaGISI: KOYN: TeG: eRMiŞ: İLGeRÜ: KURİGaRU: SÜLeP: TIRMiŞ: 🕊️🕊️KUBRaTMIŞ🕊️🕊️: KaMaGI:) go research this. The name of Kubrat's son, Batbayan, is also mentioned in Turkish, *bay means "rich" and *bayan means wealth, and this is mentioned in the orhun inscriptions, tonyukuk inscriptions, and kultigin inscriptions. There are also two Turkish Avar kagans named *Bayan. The name Krum is also Turkish. Also known as *korum,*kurum it means,rocky,rocky area". In Iranian languages, there are no names written with two consonants but pronounced and written with a single vowel. This is against the nature of Iranian languages. If you had any knowledge of languages, you would know this. I only agree that Khan Asparuh's name is of Iranian origin. Tangra has not been falsified to any great extent, and how can you misrepresent that part in an evasive way and you know it is incomplete, the only part that has been falsified is this one. The middle of the word (TA**RA) has just been deleted, but linguists say that the middle of it will be filled with gg or ng suffixes. Because there were no gods with this name in Scythian or Iranian mythologies. You cannot prove the Scythian origin by not responding scientifically to any claim, not presenting an argument, and simply rejecting it. You didn't even respond to the onogur claim. We don't see you as Turks anyway, we accept kubrat, krum, batbayan, omurtag as Turks. Asparuh and his entourage were culturally assimilated among the dense Slavic and Thracian population. Boris's conversion to Christianity in 864 resulted in the extinction of the culture of the proto-Bulgarians of Turkic origin.
@@The_Big_G_765Kanas u bigi or kanas ubigi is a title of Turkish origin. The names Kan, Khan, kagan, kahan come from the same origin. This title can also be given to state administrators, tribal leaders or lower-ranking administrators, and the word bigi is Turkish. It has the same phonetic sequence as the words Bey, Beğ, bek, beg, atabeg. There are also words sü bigi and sü basi in Turkish, meaning army commander and military leader. While you reject my claim of tangra as a falsified inscription, why can't you respond to the onogurous findings of the historians of that period? When you can't answer, you resort to the evasive excuse that it was falsified? It has the title İçhirgu Çila. *iç" is a word of Altai origin. For example, he has the title kavhan and kavkhan. It is mentioned even in the Orhun inscriptions of the Göktürks. He is a first-degree civil servant. You couldn't produce any evidence that the titles are of Iranian origin? By saying Scythian, you will prove that it is not just Scythian. Onogurs were one of the important elements in the establishment of both the Great Bulgarian and Danube Bulgarian states. As a matter of fact, Nikepheros (Byzantine Emperor, M.G.) stated that Kubrat, the founder of the Great Bulgarian State, was the "lord of the Onogurs". The Byzantine emperor says, do you not accept this? The Byzantine historian named Theophanes says that the khan kubrat was the ruler of "Patria onoguria (the land of onogur)". Theophanes is a court historian who personally saw the kubrat alive. Couldn't you answer these? These are primary sources and give important clues, but you couldn't say anything about them? Because it was true. You couldn't refuse. There is no tamga of the Dulo dynasty in Thracian carvings, which is an unfounded statement. (IYI) This symbol exists in the Kayi tribe and the Dulo dynasty. It is a Turkish symbol. And Bulgarian names are of Turkish origin. The name Kubrat is mentioned in Orkhon inscriptions, and I even write the expression (YORuYOR: TİYIN: KÜ: eŞiDiP: BALIKDaKI: TaGIKMİŞ: TaGDakI: İNMiŞ: TIRiLiP: YeTMiŞ: eR: BOLMIŞ: TeŊRİ: KÜÇ: BİRTÜK: ÜÇiN: KaŊım: KaGaN: SÜSİ: BÖRİ: TeG: eRMiŞ: YaGISI: KOYN: TeG: eRMiŞ: İLGeRÜ: KURİGaRU: SÜLeP: TIRMiŞ: 🕊️🕊️KUBRaTMIŞ🕊️🕊️: KaMaGI:) go research this. The name of Kubrat's son, Batbayan, is also mentioned in Turkish, *bay means "rich" and *bayan means wealth, and this is mentioned in the orhun inscriptions, tonyukuk inscriptions, and kultigin inscriptions. There are also two Turkish Avar kagans named *Bayan. The name Krum is also Turkish. Also known as *korum,*kurum it means,rocky,rocky area". In Iranian languages, there are no names written with two consonants but pronounced and written with a single vowel. This is against the nature of Iranian languages. If you had any knowledge of languages, you would know this. I only agree that Khan Asparuh's name is of Iranian origin. Tangra has not been falsified to any great extent, and how can you misrepresent that part in an evasive way and you know it is incomplete, the only part that has been falsified is this one. The middle of the word (TA**RA) has just been deleted, but linguists say that the middle of it will be filled with gg or ng suffixes. Because there were no gods with this name in Scythian or Iranian mythologies. You cannot prove the Scythian origin by not responding scientifically to any claim, not presenting an argument, and simply rejecting it. You didn't even respond to the onogur claim. We don't see you as Turks anyway, we accept kubrat, krum, batbayan, omurtag as Turks. Asparuh and his entourage were culturally assimilated among the dense Slavic and Thracian population. Boris's conversion to Christianity in 864 resulted in the extinction of the culture of the proto-Bulgarians of Turkic origin.
@@The_Big_G_765Kanas u bigi or kanas ubigi is a title of Turkish origin. The names Kan, Khan, kagan, kahan come from the same origin. This title can also be given to state administrators, tribal leaders or lower-ranking administrators, and the word bigi is Turkish. It has the same phonetic sequence as the words Bey, Beğ, bek, beg, atabeg. There are also words sü bigi and sü basi in Turkish, meaning army commander and military leader. While you reject my claim of tangra as a falsified inscription, why can't you respond to the onogurous findings of the historians of that period? When you can't answer, you resort to the evasive excuse that it was falsified? It has the title İçhirgu Çila. *iç" is a word of Altai origin. For example, he has the title kavhan and kavkhan. It is mentioned even in the Orhun inscriptions of the Göktürks. He is a first-degree civil servant. You couldn't produce any evidence that the titles are of Iranian origin? By saying Scythian, you will prove that it is not just Scythian. Onogurs were one of the important elements in the establishment of both the Great Bulgarian and Danube Bulgarian states. As a matter of fact, Nikepheros (Byzantine Emperor, M.G.) stated that Kubrat, the founder of the Great Bulgarian State, was the "lord of the Onogurs". The Byzantine emperor says, do you not accept this? The Byzantine historian named Theophanes says that the khan kubrat was the ruler of "Patria onoguria (the land of onogur)". Theophanes is a court historian who personally saw the kubrat alive. Couldn't you answer these? These are primary sources and give important clues, but you couldn't say anything about them? Because it was true. You couldn't refuse. There is no tamga of the Dulo dynasty in Thracian carvings, which is an unfounded statement. (IYI) This symbol exists in the Kayi tribe and the Dulo dynasty. It is a Turkish symbol. And Bulgarian names are of Turkish origin. The name Kubrat is mentioned in Orkhon inscriptions, and I even write the expression (YORuYOR: TİYIN: KÜ: eŞiDiP: BALIKDaKI: TaGIKMİŞ: TaGDakI: İNMiŞ: TIRiLiP: YeTMiŞ: eR: BOLMIŞ: TeŊRİ: KÜÇ: BİRTÜK: ÜÇiN: KaŊım: KaGaN: SÜSİ: BÖRİ: TeG: eRMiŞ: YaGISI: KOYN: TeG: eRMiŞ: İLGeRÜ: KURİGaRU: SÜLeP: TIRMiŞ: 🕊️🕊️KUBRaTMIŞ🕊️🕊️: KaMaGI:) go research this. The name of Kubrat's son, Batbayan, is also mentioned in Turkish, *bay means "rich" and *bayan means wealth, and this is mentioned in the orhun inscriptions, tonyukuk inscriptions, and kultigin inscriptions. There are also two Turkish Avar kagans named *Bayan. The name Krum is also Turkish. Also known as *korum,*kurum it means,rocky,rocky area". In Iranian languages, there are no names written with two consonants but pronounced and written with a single vowel. This is against the nature of Iranian languages. If you had any knowledge of languages, you would know this. I only agree that Khan Asparuh's name is of Iranian origin. Tangra has not been falsified to any great extent, and how can you misrepresent that part in an evasive way and you know it is incomplete, the only part that has been falsified is this one. The middle of the word (TA**RA) has just been deleted, but linguists say that the middle of it will be filled with gg or ng suffixes. Because there were no gods with this name in Scythian or Iranian mythologies. You cannot prove the Scythian origin by not responding scientifically to any claim, not presenting an argument, and simply rejecting it. You didn't even respond to the onogur claim. We don't see you as Turks anyway, we accept kubrat, krum, batbayan, omurtag as Turks. Asparuh and his entourage were culturally assimilated among the dense Slavic and Thracian population. Boris's conversion to Christianity in 864 resulted in the extinction of the culture of the proto-Bulgarians of Turkic origin.
Excellent video, what surprised me was that Bulgharic branch (Sabir, Chuvash, Khazars) has negligible p-Turkic DNA. Were the nomads really that outnumbered?
Culturally, anthropologically, and genetically, the Bulghars were Sarmatians, namely Alans, spreading from the Caucasus from the beginning of CE. numerous waves of Türks eventually Turkified the local Sarmatians.
@@x-error404alphaepicfellsan9 Mongol and Mongoloid are modern terms. The ancient Mongols of Genghis Khan are the Turks. But we do not deny that modern Mongols have the dna of the Turks, since we are nomads and lived together.
@@The_Geographer_Maps "Culturally, anthropologically, and genetically, the Bulghars were Sarmatians", LMAO, hence their turkic name and turkic language, right?
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid
Tatkan belives in alp tunga. An createt fiktiv caracter with leopard fur on had wirtten 1500 years after scyhtian. He beloefs in an turkish batman hahahahahahha
We have no such thing as Proto-Turkic genes. This is a hypothetical word.Some consider Slab Grave to be proto-Turkic, but this is wrong. Slab Grave was a proto Mongolian and Proto-Tungusic culture. The Asian genes related to Gok Turks and Huns came mainly from the Baikal EBA cultures, whose genome was about 80% similar to the Slab Grave culture, and basically the Slab Grave itself migrated to this region from the east of Baikal. So this map is totally wrong.
I don’t understand why there is such confidence, maybe you think is wrong? Early Xiongnu shows a clinality between the Chandman Saka, genetically Tasmola, that have some ancestry from Khovsgol_BA, genetically Baikal EBA, and Slab Grave. But by the late period of the Xiongnu, as in medieval Turks and Uighurs of Mongolia, the ancestry from Chandman disappears and the ancestry associated with the Sarmatians appears, genetically similar to the Alans of Asia and the Kangju. And at this time a wedge stands between the Sarmatians and Slab Grave. No strong connection with Baikal EBA is found during this period. Article: A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of Eurasia’s Eastern Steppe www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click%20on%20image%20to%20zoom&p=PMC3&id=7664836_figs4.jpg Including the Kazakhs, having a large East Asian ancestry, do not show descent from AG3, unlike Khovsgol BA. Even the Sarmatians had more ancestry from AG3 not originating from Sintashta than the Kazakhs. Article: Ancient genomic time transect from the Central Asian Steppe unravels the history of the Scythians www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg Mongols show the highest ancestry from Slab Grave probably due to additional genetically identical influx from Manchuria. The accounts in Vahaduo show that the Later Xiongnu as well as the medieval Turks of Mongolia and the Kazakh, Kirghiz and Mongols mainly stand in a wedge between Slab Grave and Kangju. Their ancestry from Khovsgol BA is scanty. And the Tungus Evenki show mainly ancestry from Nganasan.
"The Huns spoke Hunnish, also called the Hunnic language. Its language family remains unclassified. However, the written evidence for the language is comparable to Turkic, Mongolic and Yeniseian languages. This is why Huns are believed to have been descendants from Kazakhstan, or of Turkic tribes from the Xiongnu " Believe not certain
Hey dude nice work and i really like your videos can i give you an idea for a next video? Do a map of paleo balkanic adn(thracians ilyrians, paonians etc)
We can follow from sources that apart from Xiongnu, the people in the west, north and northwest also spoke Turkic at that time. Since this video was prepared entirely on the basis of the Slab Grave spread, I believe that it should be emphasized that the Deer Stones culture is at least Para-Turkic. Because Turkic expansion cannot be explained only by the Xiongnu. If the Deer Stones culture were the Yeniseian people, as Westerners most likely believe, there would be a very intense Yenisey influence in the Turkic language, and we do not see any Yeniseian influence in any of the Turkic languages. Thanks to studies, we know that the people of Deer Stones and Slab Grave never fought, that they had intense exchanges and relationships, that they lived among each other and were influenced by each other's cultures, and that they emulated each other. Two different cultures are a rare situation in world history. We also know that within the Seima-Turbino culture, the ancestors of the Uralians, the Khövsgöl and Ulaanzukh people, together formed a large and culturally significant steppe warrior-raiding community, which was deeply rooted even in Andronovo, extending from the Sintashta region to the northeast of today's China. In other words, the only obstacle to classifying peoples, such as the Proto-Scythian cultures and Saka, who mostly carry Deer Stones genetics but also have Indo-Iranian genetic heritage and who were born in Siberia, which Westerners classify as Indo-Iranian society, and the Saka, within the Turkic spread, is language. proof. However, for some reason, it seems very hypocritical to me to classify these societies as Indo-Iranian when there is no evidence of language. If you want to learn the language of the Deer Stones culture, I believe that you should look at the language of today's Saha-Sakhas. Because even today they are proud to say "We are the descendants of the Sakhas" and their rituals reveal this very clearly. They also speak Turkic language, but the number of words used in sentences and different synonyms is very high.
The Khazars Convert To Judaism ✡In 730, I Living In Tel Aviv, But My Ancestors Come From Crimea. I Am verry prouded with my Khazar ancestors. and not all Jewish are descended from Jacobs 12 Tribe, like my and the other Ashkenazi Groups. also Ashkenazi was one of the sons of Japheth!
The ancestry of the ancestors did not make the Crimea. The Khazar was tolerant. Their descendants founded Turkey. He installed it in Hungary. Kievi is their creation. Bulgaria they founded. And they are not Jews. Quintessentially Turks. Even those who made a state in the Germanic tribes. They ruled Iran for years. Even Palestine. Do what suits you now and stop the genocide.
I wonder if you modelled a composite Turko-Mongol genetic signature from the parallel migrations, likewise Germano-Slavic for Migration-Era Europe impact
The amount of information in this video is impressive. I can't imagine creating anything similar to this. I don't know enough about any of this to how accurate it is, but I wonder: Didn't the Turks migrate to Anatolia in the 1200s? I thought the whole reason why they migrated to Anatolia in the first place was to flee from the Mongol invasions that occurred in that century? Edit: I guess that's not really true.
first half migrated to anatolia after the 1071 manzikert war bc seljuks wanted to turkify anatolia. after the mongols conquerored Khwarezm turkmens didnt wanted a mongolian rule so the turkmen tribes migrated anatolia and after the mongols collapsed the second half established the ottomans
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid
I think we can't name them Proto-Turkic before they mixed with Siberian Aryans. No difference in genotype between those early 'Proto-Turkic' and Mongols. Probably correct naming should be paleo-Altay herders-gatherers.
It's mostly symbolic. All peoples are genetically heterogeneous. "Turkic ancestry" or "Slavic ancestry" doesn't mean much because, most of the time, nationalities and nationality groupings are based on language.
Not ironical. Nomads migrated and intermarried with local people. Turks migrated anatolia with incredible number of populations that changed the region and course of the history. In 12th century, Anatolia is called Turchia(Turkey) by the Latins that support the idea of power of the migration. They intermarried and created Modern Turkish people. Modern Turks have significant amount of Turkic ancestry in their genes.
@@hongdalai2753 no they dont. Kyrgyz and Kazakhs have Scythian and other Steppe admixture, and the Uyghurs have Tocharian admixture. There's no such thing as a "Proto-Turkic" look or Proto-anythig look. Everybody is mixed. Stop talking nonsense.
@@hongdalai2753 in Turkey we have so many different ethnic groups and foreigners, Turkish Tatars, Yörüks and some villagers from some regions have Nomadic -Turkic face, Kazakhs and Krygiz also have other nations blood, Mongolian and russian blood but most probably they are purer than us because we, Turks of Turkey, are grandsons of Turkic people and Anatolian natives. Of course we are not interested in adding other ethnical groups to this case, we talk about Turks that identify theirselves Turks, we do not talk about Kurdish people or Arabian people or Armenian nation or Circassian/Cherkes/Abhaz communities or Laz people, or minorites that belong to Slavic people or other race from Balkans (Albanians, Pomaks, Bosnian).
An important caveat: 'Turks' did not "borrow a nomadic lifestyle" from Indo-Europeans. One part of ancestors of proto-Turks(who were millet and rice farmers mainly in 5th millenium BCE) left Manchuria/Southeastern Siberia(probably due to steppification of the area by severe droughts as such phenomena constantly happen even today) and mixed with paleo-Siberian reindeer herders who were nomads already, and long before the Indo-European/Scythian admixture they mixed with those people and adopted herder-nomadism. Indo-European nomads(Scythians or a sister branch of proto-IE people) gave those pre-proto-Turks *equestrianism* , NOT necessarily *nomadism*.
@@HatredForMankind The Turks are not from Manchuria, and the early Turks were never pure Mongoloids and farmers The ancestors of the Turks since at least the Bronze Age lived in Tarim, Ordos, western Altai and the eastern steppes of modern Kazakhstan The Turks were originally cattle breeders and horse breeders
@@Scythian_nomad I am talking about the formation of proto-Turks. Horses came from the west, from Ponto-Caspian steppes and gradually introduced to the east.
@@The_Geographer_Maps A Bulgar sample from the 9th or 10th century was shared in "the Turkish DNA project" Bulgaria Turks were ranked 1st on the affinity list and had an eastern Eurasian heritage at a level similar to that of modern Turks (other Balkan peoples have this east Asian heritage at the level of no or much lower).
@@Sadoyasturadoglu Alas, I could not find this sample. The elite of the Avar Kaganate from the 8th to 9th centuries shows the emergence of a new genetic component associated with the North Caucasus, apparently from the Bulgars. Moreover, this component lacks East Asian origin. Article: Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs2.jpg ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg In addition, samples from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the 8th to 10th centuries in the Kharkov region, apparently belonging to the Khazars, show the identity to the North Caucasians. media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg Also, my calculations on Vahaduo about Balkan populations show the absence of East Asian ancestry not from Turkish, but a good presence of ancestry from the North Caucasus. Albanian Chechen Kazakh Slovakian Turkish_Antalya Gagauz 66.5 9.8 0.2 19.5 4.1
Bulgarian 60.9 4.9 0.3 30.4 3.4 Macedonian 66.6 1.9 0.0 31.5 0.0 Serbian 49.9 2.2 0.2 47.5 0.3 Also, non-Fino-Ugric East Asian ancestry is absent among the populations of the Volga Bulgaria region which were not influenced by the Kipchaks. Chechen Erzya Kazakh Mansi Chuvash 6.5 57.6 1.3 34.6 Udmurt 10.7 48.2 0.0 41.1 Mari 1.7 49.2 0.0 49.2 Tatar_Kazan 13.0 59.8 13.8 13.4 It is likely that your sample may be associated with the Pechenegs
Рік тому+6
Excellent! I would suggest that majority of people living in Eastern Turkey be Turkish too. Contrary to the popular belief, Kurdish population there is in minority.
The Black Sea section in the "Turkish" tab is incorrect. The only provinces that do not have Turkic contribution are Rize, Trabzon and Artvin. The remaining provinces have an East Asian input of around 8-15%, just like other provinces in Anatolia. In fact, Giresun province had outlier results from other provinces, has an East Asian heritage with an average of 16% and a range of 12-20%. And again, the elite paternal lineage of the Xiongnu, C-Y10420, originates from the provinces of Giresun, Samsun and Sivas. Those who want can review TDP's datasheet.
The first unmistakable evidence of Turkic history begins with the Huns/Xiongnu. There are theories about civilizations that preceded this, but there are not yet enough archaeological findings to provide convincing proof that these people were Turkic or that the confederations were governed by a Turkic ruling class, as in other confederations. However, the Huns have now become unmistakable with all the evidence: The names of Xiongnu and Western Hun leaders are almost indisputably Turkic. Additionally, there are other findings that strengthen this connection. Khan Dikkiz (Dengizich - Deniz) Dish/Plate A dish with runes was translated with the following text: Kinkeg Dikkiz ükü kässä Kiji sax sax saxynil gür Tänrig Translation: "Fear the blow of King Dikkiz the Wise! Retreat to the God beyond this world!" Sura Rune Inscription Another inscription, attributed to the Xiongnu/Huns, reads as follows: (i)g känč : ap(a) kurčik : sal aranģï : eenč uğ(a) Translation: "Ah young Apa Kurčik, let yourself rest in peaceful sleep in the coffin/burial / rest in peaceful sleep in the coffin/burial!" Chinese Historical Mention A Chinese historian noted the following words he heard in the Xiongnu language. In 329 CE, a Xiongnu leader asked Fo-t’u-teng for help regarding an upcoming battle against Liu Yao. After a ritual, he spoke a prophecy in the Ho language: siu-k’i t’i-li-kang puh-koh kü-t’u-tang Interpretation: "The army will march and capture Liu Yao." Meaning of the terms: siu-k’i: "army" t’i-li-kang: "march" puh-koh: "Liu Yao" (his title) kü-t’u-tang: "capture" Transcriptions by Sinologists Bernhard Karlgren: siog tieg t’iei lied kang b’uok kuk g’iu t’uk-tang Edwin G. Pulleyblank: sux-keh the-let-kang buk-kok goh-thok-tang Turkic Reconstructions G.J. Ramstedt: Süke talıkıng (talıkang) bügüg (ügeg) tutang - "Go to war, capture the enemy leader!" Talat Tekin: Sü:ke tılıkang bugukgı tuktang - "Go to war, capture Buguk (the leader)." Significance This expression represents one of the earliest known examples of a Turkic language and provides valuable insight into the linguistic and cultural interactions between the Xiongnu and Chinese civilizations. Xiongnu and Turkic Connections Similarities in Runes The runes of the Xiongnu are nearly identical to the Göktürk runic script. Mentions in Chinese Sources Book of Jin: Mentions 19 Southern Xiongnu tribes who entered Former Yan, the 14th of which was the Alat (Ch. 賀賴 Helai ~ 賀蘭 Helan ~ 曷剌 Hela). Alat translates to "pinto horse" (Ch. 駁馬 ~ 駮馬 Boma) in Old Turkic. Book of Zhou, History of the Northern Dynasties, Tongdian, New Book of Tang: Mention that the Göktürks and the ruling Ashina clan were part of the Xiongnu confederation. Uyghur Khagans: Claimed descent from the Xiongnu. Book of Wei: States that the Yueban descended from the Northern Xiongnu and that their language and customs were similar to those of the Tiele. Names and Meanings Alat (Turkic: Ala or Alagchin): Means "pinto horse." This tribal name appears in both Chinese annals and later Turkic tribes. The Xiongnu referred to heaven (天): Chēnglí (擇犁), a Chinese transcription of Tengri. Ruling Clans Luandi/Xulianti Clan: This was the ruling clan of the Xiongnu from the 3rd century BCE to the 4th century CE. The word Luandi comes from the Chinese Book of Han, while Xulianti is from the Book of Later Han. Chinese researchers reconstruct Old Chinese Luandi as Hala-yundluğ, meaning "tribe with pinto horses" in an early Turkic dialect. Further Details Lanhai Wei and Hui Li: Reconstruct the Old Chinese pronunciation of 挛鞮 as lyuan-tlïɣ, originating from an earlier form 虚连题 (Hala-yundluɣ). This resulted from a historical sound shift where h- disappeared. The roots hala (colorful), yund (horse), and the participle suffix -luɣ combined to mean "tribe with pinto horses" in an early Turkic dialect. This can be identified with the historical Ulayundluğ tribe (ALAT TRIBE). The conquest of the same clan by the Xue in the 4th century CE led to the Xueyantuo. The Xueyantuo were an ancient Tiele tribe and khanate in Northeast Asia. They were once vassals of the Göktürks but later allied with the Tang dynasty against the Eastern Göktürks. Alat Tribe The Alat tribe (also known as Ala-at, Ala, Alachin, Alagchin, Alchin, Alchi, Alayontli, Ulayundluğ, meaning "pinto horse" or "spotted horse"). Chinese names include Boma 駁馬 or 駮馬, Helai 賀賴, Helan 賀蘭, Hela 曷剌, and Bila 弊剌. In the old Turkic lexicon, the meaning of "pinto horse" is expressed with terms such as ala or alagchin, which are still used in compound expressions today. The Tang Huiyao mentions a tribe named Geluozhiya (葛羅枝牙) directly after the Ashina tribe, with a tamga that was later also found among the Oghuz tribe. Since the Oghuz (Turkmen) tribe of Alayontli has the same tamga as the Boma (Alat) tribe, and the name also translates to "pinto horse," Zuev is convinced that Alayontli is the same tribe as Alat. Conclusion The evidence that the Xiongnu leaders were of Turkic origin is overwhelming. Their language, runes, religious terms, and the connections with later Turkic tribes such as the Göktürks and Oghuz support this conclusion. According to Chinese historians, there is no doubt about the origin of the Xiongnu; only Western historians have proposed alternative theories, which are becoming increasingly untenable. In several Chinese sources, it is also mentioned that "Chanyu," the title for the Xiongnu leaders, was also given to later Tujue (Turkic) leaders. "Chanyu" is sometimes transcribed as "Tarkan." The full title is Chengli Gutu Chanyu = Tengri Çocuğu Tarkan. This means "Son of god/heaven _[INSERT NAME]_ (Tar)khan. A new Turkic stone was found of the gökturk empire by the way and it word for word contains the title "son of god/heaven". The Xiongnu empire had a military structure that showed many similarities with later Turkic and Mongolian armies. Their army was organized in a hierarchical system with different divisions: Tuqi Kings (Wise Kings) of Left and Right: Directly under the Leader, these kings governed the left (eastern) and right (western) wings of the empire. The Tuqi King of the Left Wing was usually the heir apparent. The word Tuqi is a direct translation of the Turkic (j)ükü, meaning "wise," which literally reflects the Chinese concept of "wise prince." Guli (Ku-li) and Military Commanders: Officials who oversaw military operations, with counterparts on both the left and right sides. The term Guli (Ku-li) is related to the Turkic word Kolu, meaning "arms" or "wings" of the army, referring to a military division or branch of the forces.
Around 1040, nomadic Oghuz Turks were in Iran, Iraq and Syria. From here they came to Anatolia and over time they spread over a wide area to the Balkans. Today this can be proven not only with DNA but also with cultural remains. Since Turks spread over a very wide area, it is not possible for them to remain with a uniform DNA.
Proto-turkic culture is originally from idil(volga) and this ancestry meter is definitely not true. Our turkic ancestors from idel were not asians like mongolians its clear
@@tanhukim9963 neye göre söylüyosun bunu, bu tez batılıların yanlı tezlerinden biri sadece, doğruluğu yok. Asyalı görünüşe sahip olmayanlar Türk değildir fikriyle yanlı olarak oluşturulmuş bi yalan bu, plana dahil olarak türkiye türkleri aslında müslümaan yunan falan diye saçmalamaları da bundan kaynaklı. Gittiğimizde her yerde yerlilerle bi oranda karıştık bu doğru,ama çoğunlukla Türk genetik mirasını taşıyoruz. Batıya göçen oğuzlar burdaki yerlilerle,kazaklar da moğollar karıştı, bu kadar farklı gözükmemizin sebebi budur.
No that's not true. All Medieval Turkics are Eurasian. Including Kipchaks who lived in Kazakhstan and Russia. Let's model modern Turks with Kipchaks to see how Turkic they are. Target: Turkish(West) Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047 31.2 KAZ_Kipchak 30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC 8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC Target: Turkish(Bolu) Distance: 0.7747% / 0.00774707 35.8 KAZ_Kipchak 24.4 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 16.4 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 14.2 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 5.4 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC 2.4 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC 1.4 Levant_Sidon_1800BC Target: Turkish(Muğla) Distance: 0.7316% / 0.00731601 42.6 KAZ_Kipchak 27.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 13.6 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 6.8 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC 6.6 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 3.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC These are all Vahaduo calculations. Hope it helps you the understand. Schyto Sarmatian ancestry in Medieval Turkics is not Persian at all. Persians are Elamites with minimal real Indo European ancestry. Also Turks have upto %22 East Asian ancestry. And medieval Turkics are all Eurasian. Let's compare Uzbek and Anatolian Turk and Anatolian Greek in neolithic calculation. Target: Greek_Cappadocia Distance: 3.3814% / 0.03381362 50.4 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer) 18.6 GEO_CHG(Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer) 16.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer) 8.0 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer) 6.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European) Target: Uzbek Distance: 3.2676% / 0.03267641 38.0 RUS_Devils-Gate-Cave_N(North_East_Asian) 30.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European) 17.8 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer) 12.0 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer) 1.4 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer) Target: Turkish(Muğla) Distance: 1.8099% / 0.01809908 34.2 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer) 22.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European) 17.2 RUS_Devils-Gate-Cave_N(North_East_Asian) 14.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer) 6.6 GEO_CHG(Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer) 5.0 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer) And let's model Turk between Uzbek and Anatolian Greek. Target: Turkish(Muğla) Distance: 2.2850% / 0.02284951 53.8 Greek_Cappadocia 46.2 Uzbek Hope it helps you to understand.
@@xdd87evet knk illaki diğer ırkların da vardır. Bizim anadoluda %15-20 civarı doğu asya dnası zaten. Hint Avrupa oranı ona bakılırsa daha az. %5 civarı. Ben IE dnası daha çok çıkar sanıyordum. Ancak çıkmamış. Yunan dnasıno IE dnaso sanıyordum ANF ( Anadolu neolithic farmer) dnası ıktı. Haritalarda yunanistanı gösterince Yunan dnası sanıyor bizim millet. Alakası yokmuş. IE dnası kıyı kenarlarında %10 olabilir. Çünkü Yunanlılar ve diğer IEler kıyı kenarlarına yerleşti çoğunluk. Hem biz Orta Asya'dan da taşımış olabiliriz IE dnasını. Çünkü genelde Hint Avrupalılar anadoluyu ve mezopotamyayı asimile etti. Örneğin Kürtlerde ve ermenilerde Türkiyede yaşayanlarında hiç yok. Ama söze gelince biz devşirmeyiz😂. Ermenistan'da ki ermenilerde de hiç yok. Kürtlerde olsa olsa %1-5 arası güneydoğu Anadolu'nun güney illerinde yaşayanların da vardır. Kuzeyinde yok. Hatta o bile yoktur. Kızılbaş olan Zaza Kürtlerde çoğunluk Türk dnası var. Bir de zaten savaştan sonra çoğu Ermeni (en az 5 milyon gizli Ermeni) Kürt kılığına girdi.
Siberian Tatar, They migrated to Siberia after the disintegration of the Mongol Golden Horde, and they are not ancient Mongol-speaking Tatars. They are descendants of the Volga Bulgarians. They were called Tatars because of the Mongol ruling elite, “Tatars,” and they are not true Tatars.
False, they are descendants of local cumans and native people of western Siberia. They haven't genetic connections with volga tatars who are mostly descendants of Volga finnic people.
Wonderful job, your video about the Uralic peoples was great and I hope you do another video about the Saka (Iranian) and Tocharian Indo European steppe peoples to really complete the “steppe trilogy”. That being said the language of the Xiongnu, Huns and Hepthalites is quite contested. With the Hephtalites probably being the most likely speakers of Turkic languages (before their adoption of Sogdian and Bactrian). Again though, many dispute this and say they were Iranians. The answer is probably in the middle. The language of the Xiongnu however, especially that of the elites is believed to be belonging to the Yeniseian family, essentially Siberian in origin. Although it is quite probable the lay tribesman was speaking a form of Proto-Turkic and/or had Proto-Turkic ancestry. Finally the Huns are again, not certain, as there is no written source from the Huns themselves, only Latinized and Hellenized names. Many believe they were speaking a form of Oghur Turkic, Mongolic or Yeniseian. With the tribes they subjugated mainly speaking Iranian or Tocharian languages. My main correction is linguistic, I’m sure all of these groups had Proto-Turkic ancestry but there is still a lot that is uncertain. Still a great video and keep making more
I'm currently making a map about the Indo-Iranians. I made the Turkic map to complete the Indo-Iranian map, since the Turks have some proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry. The Kazakhs stand in a wedge between the Sarmatians and the East Asian source that shows no ancestry from AG3 or ANE. This shows that this East Asian source did not originate from South Siberian cultures such as Khovsgol, but originate from the steppe culture of Ulaanzuukh, the ancestor of the Slab-Grave culture that were the ancestor of the Xiongnu. www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867420313210-gr3.jpg Linguistics shows that the first division of the Common Turkic language was into Siberian and Central Asian, and chronologicaly was apparently connected with the displacement of the Xiongnu from Mongolia. The Central Asian branch of the Turkic language was divided on average in 250 CE, namely into agricultural ones, associated with the Oguzes, apparently descending from the Chionites, and into nomadic ones, associated with the Kipchaks, descending from the Yueban. www.turkceogretimi.com/images/2019/turkdilleri3glottochronology.jpg www.researchgate.net/profile/Tanmoy-Bhattacharya-2/publication/270000362/figure/fig2/AS:613900487774210@1523376690336/Phylogenetic-Trees-of-the-Turkic-Language-Family-Consensus-topologies-for-the-model.png qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f483b8667866ac970d49af4bebfcc24c-lq In addition, on the Kidarite seal from Samarkand there is the inscription “Oglar Hun” of Turkic origin.
The names of some organs it's used as the suffix for nouns, “Ak”= ~each of both (Yan= side) Yan-ak= each of both sides (of the face) >Yanak= cheek (Gül= rose) Kül-ak = each of both the roses >Kulak= Ear (Şek=facet) Şek-ak = each of both sides (of forehead) >Şakak= temple (Dal=subsection, branch) Dal-ak=dalak= Spleen (Böbür=scarlet fleck) Böbür-ak=böbrek= Kidney = each of both red-spots / blodfleck Bağça-ak>(Paça-ak)>bacak= Leg (ankle) (Pati = paw) Batı-ak>pathiak>phatyak>hadyak>adyak)=Ayak= the foot > each of the feet (Taş=stone) Taş-ak=testicle Akciğer=(each of) both lungs Tül-karn-ak =that obscures/ shadowing each of both dark/ covert periods= Karanlık (batıni) çağların her birini örten tül Zhu'l-karn-eyn=the (shader) owner of each of both times Dhu'al-chorn-ein=double-horned-one=(the horned hunter)Herne the hunter> Cernunnos> Karneios it's used as the suffix for verbs, “Ak /ek“=a-qa ~which thing to / what’s to… Er-mek = to get / to reach Bar-mak (Varmak)= to arrive / to achieve Er-en-mek > erinmek / Bar-an-mak > barınmak =arrive at one's own Erin-ek / barın-ak = what’s there to arrive at oneself Ernek / Barnak > Parmak = Finger Çiğ=uncooked, raw Çiğne-mek =to chew Çiğne-ek>Çiğneh> Çene = Chin Tut-mak = to hold / to keep Tut-ak=Dudak= Lip Tara-mak = to comb/ ~to rake Tara-ak > Tarak =(what’s there to comb)> the comb Tara-en-mak > taranmak = to comb oneself Taran-ak > Tırnak =(what’s there to comb oneself)> fingernail
NATURAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS (akar-eser / eser-eger) EĞER-ISE = (EVEN-IF) (su AKAR- yel ESER) = water flows - wind blows İSE-EĞER = (IF-EVER) (yel ESER- ekin EĞER)= the wind blows and bows the crops EĞER-ISE and İSE-EĞER constructs are used to specify "conditions" and are often used interchangeably. İSE-EĞER: means "If ever" and indicates a condition that is more likely to occur. "If ever you need any help, just let me know." (Yardıma ihtiyacın olursa eğer, sadece haberim olsun) or (Herhangi bir yardıma ihtiyaç duyarsan, bana haber vermen yeterli) “If I'm not tired, we can visit them in the evening.” = “Yorgun değilsem eğer, akşamleyin onları ziyaret edebiliriz” EĞER-ISE: means "Even if" and indicates a condition that is less likely to occur. "Even if it rains tomorrow, I will go for a walk." (Yarın yürüyüşe çıkacağım, eğer yağmur yağıyor olsa da ) or (Yarın yağmur yağsa bile yürüyüşe çıkacağım.) “Why should i go to work, (even) if I'm not getting my salary” = Eğer maaşımı alamıyorsam, neden işe gideyim ki.
Yeğ / Yüğ = upper, superior Yeğ-mek > Yemek (to eat)= to add on oneself, to take it in one's essence Yeğ-im> Yem= provender, fodder > Yemiş= fruit Yüğ-le-mek > yeğlemek = to keep it on top of others, make it relatively superior, ~to prefer Yüğ-ka-yer-u > yukarı =(which side is on top) = Up Yüğ-ce > yüce = superior in level /sublime Yüğ-ce-al-mek > yücelmek = to achieve superiority in level Yüğ-sü-ek > yüksek = high Yüğ-sel > yüksel = exponential , superlative Yüğ-sü-al-mek> yükselmek = to rise to a high level, to ascend Yüğ-sük > yüzük =(ring)= jewelry worn on the finger top Yüğ-sü-en-mek > yüksünmek= to feel slighted / take offended Yüğ-ük > yük =(load)> carried on top, undertaken Yüğ-ün > yün =(wool)> the feathers that on sheep Yüğ-üt > yiğit =(valiant)> superior in character Yüğ-en > yüğen /yeğen =(nephew)> which is kept superior, held in high esteem, valued, precious (yüen > yen 元) Yüğ-en-cük > yüğençüğ > yinçi (inci) =(precious little thing)> pearl , 珍珠 Yüğengi >yengi> yeni =(new)> what's that coming on top , what's coming after Yüğenge > yenge =(brother's wife)> who's coming after, added to the family later (new bride) Yüğ-üne /Yeğ-ine > yine/ gene =again /over and over > yeniden = anew /once more Yüğ-en-mek> yenmek = to overcome, to cope with, to subdue Yüğ-en-el-mek > yenilmek= to be overcome, to be subdued, to show weakness Yüğengil > yengil =remains on top of, light, weak Şan= Glory, splendor 單于 > Şan-Yüğ =Exalted glorious Yormak=to tire= to arrive over someone (too many). (too much) to go onto (Yörmek)> Örmek=(to operate on something), to weave on top , to wrap around (Yörümek)> Yürümek= to go over something, to wander around (yöre=precincts) (yörük=nomad) Yürümek= to walk (yürü=go on) Yülümek=to go by slipping over something Yalamak= to lick >~to take swiping/ by scraping on something off Yolmak= to pluck=to pull by snatching off, tear off (~flatten the top) Yılmak=to throw down from the one's own top (~get bored), to hit the ground from above (yıldırım=lightning…yıldız=star) Yurmak= to pull onto, cover over (yur-ut>yurt=tabernacle) (yur-gan>yorgan=quilt) Yırmak=to bring it on top of, to take it off (yırışmak>yarışmak= to race> to overcome each other) (Yır-et-mak)>Yırtmak= to tear= to get it inside-out or bottom to top (by pulling from both sides) (~tide over, get rid of it) Yarmak= to split, to tear apart= go vertically from top to bottom, separate by cutting off Yermek=to pull down ,pull to the ground Germek=to tense= to pull it in all directions > Sermek= to spread it in all directions Yıkmak= to demolish= overthrow , take down from top to bottom, turn upside down Yığmak= to stack= put on top of each other, dump on top of each other (yığlamak=shed tears over and over, cry over) Yağmak=get rained on, get spilled on / to pour down from above Yakmak= to burn out=to purify matter by heating and removing mass , reduce its volume Yoğmak=make condensed=to tighten and purify, narrow by turning, get rid of own volume (~get dead) Yoğurmak= to knead=tighten and thicken , reduce volume, bring to consistency (Yogurt=thickened milk product) Yuğmak=to purify squeezing to clean (Yuğamak>yıkamak= to wash) Yiv = sharp, pointed (yivlemek= sharpen the tip) Yuvmak=to squeezing thin out, narrow (yuvka>yufka= thin dough) (yuvka>yuka=thin, shallow) (yuvuz>yavuz=thin, weak, delicate) Yuvarlamak=to round off=narrow by turning (yuva (smallest shelter)= nest) (yavru (smallest)= cub ) Yummak=to shut by squeezing, close tightly (Yumurmak=make it closes inward) (yumruk=fist) (yumurta= egg)
@@The_Geographer_Maps Also Bashkir history is something weird here? They are considered as people living near Urals, not Caspian Sea. Nevertheless, you did great work with this video
You have added some non-turkic speaker having proto-turkic ancestry. Then, why didn't you add eastern sycthians whose their dna mongoloid dominant and generally coming from proto-turks (Amur River HG)? In your Proto-İndo European Video , you even showed how %100 east eurasian people from mongolia migrated to West Eurasia and the change in DNA Western Sycthians and Cimmerians due to this migration. -The Tribe of Yemek may be "Kimek", I guess
The East Asian source that influenced the Scythians shows admixture from Botai and apparently comes from Khovsgol and Baikal EBA, unlike for example the Kazakhs whose East Asian source shows no Botai admixture, and probably comes from Ulaanzuukh and the derived Slab Grave. www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867420313210-gr3.jpg Yemek is an alternative name for Kimek. In different historical sources this people are called differently
"The Xiongnu Empire encompassed virtually every ethnic and linguistic group in Inner Asia. These included the Mongolic-speaking Donghu people to the east and the Indo-European-speaking Yuezhi people to the west. There was also a large population of Turkic and Iranian language speakers within the Xiongnu Empire "
Mongol and Mongoloid are modern terms. The ancient Mongols of Genghis Khan are the Turks. But we do not deny that modern Mongols have the dna of the Turks, since we are nomads and lived together.
@@keteket Mongols are not Turks. They may have lived in close proximity to Turkic tribes, but are themselves not Turks. They are a separate people with a different language and culture.
@@SerkanKabak25türk boylariyla Moğol boyları çokça karışmış o sebepten bu sonuca varmış olabilirler ama kültür aynı dilleri farklı mogolların köken olarak aynı dil olabilir çinceden çok etkilenmiş deişmiştir belki
Are the Turks the same survivors of Mongol Genghis in the lands captured by the Mongols? And if the answer is negative, then what kind of race are the Turks and what do they do in the lands that originally had white and Semitic people throughout history?
They are the descendants of Seljuks which conquered the region in 1071. So Turks were in Turkey before the Mongol invasions. They originate from modern day Mongolia, southern Siberia and Northern Manchuria. They do have their similarities with Mongolic people as they lived in a similar geography and are both Altaic people but they are not the same.
I have Turkic DNA in me from way back of course. DNA match with Yakuts, Altaians, Mongolian, and a Kazakhstan nomadic woman from the 400's BC. This may all come from Native American DNA .
Native americans and Turkic people share DNA indeed, they were originally Turkic people who crossed Siberia into America. Look at the Na-Dene languages that share many Turkic words and Havasupai people for example Hava = Air/Sky Su = Water and Pai = Boy = Clan, it has the same meaning in Turkic to this day as it does to the Havasupai people. Then look at symbols and carpet weaving, it's the exact same weaving and look at videos of the Sakha/Yakut people. Kayak = Kayik (turkic word, which literally would mean to slide, drift or in this case float) Tepee = Tepe = Top in turkic we call the holes in our yurts "Tepegöz" which means eye at the top, similarly tepees have eyes at the top. We would call a mountain a Tepe too. And then there's hundreds of words like I meantioned that are the same in many Native American languages. We also have symbols that are the same, we have for example wolf's mouth symbol in carpet weaving or "Handsonhips = Elinbelinde" symbol, we see this symbol with Native Americans as well. There's dozens of similar symbols like that. Clothing is another thing that is similar. It's quite undeniable that these people are connected.
Is it possible that some of these people migrated to italy or spain a few centuries ago? I believe to have (confirmed by DNA) some of this heritage, coming from Spain or Italy. I'm thinking probably Spain mostly.
Probably, hidden hands are deliberately misrepresenting history to us. Inside the plateau of Iran, there are tens of thousands of villages with Turkish names in all parts of the country, which are more than three thousand years old. There are ancient works with Turkish lines of Orkhon, which are more than three thousand years old. How is it possible that all these works, which are more than three thousand years old, are deliberately ignored in the scientific circles of the West? Azerbaijan, where all its people are Turks and more than three times these people live inside Iran, considers everyone as Turks. The ugly hands of lies have gone so far that all Turkish governments of Iran such as the Safavids, the Seljuks, the Timurids, the Ghaznavids, the Aqqoyunlu, the Qaraquyunlu, the Qajar, the Afsharian, and so on, introduce them as Persia. And what is more interesting is that in this distortion of history, all western circles seem to be united. I must add that most archaeologists in Iran consider what the Westerners introduce as the Achaemenid Empire, as well as Cyrus the Great and Darius the Great, and even the ancient works of Persepolis and Pasargad, a shameless falsification of the history of the region.
Why you showing Chigil as distinct tribe from Uyghurs, you showing Chigils are kazakhs tribe... When Chigils are one of dominant Tribe of Uyghurs in Southern Xinjiang, they have very Caucasoid features. kazakh don't look like Karluks, they look Mongol
@@tanhukim9963 Chigil aren't kazakh part never . Chigil are one of Tribe of Karluks, they live in Kashgar and Fergana valley, they aren't connected to Mongol kazakhs with C2 haplo Tungus
I do not show Chigil as Kazakhs. Just a group of nomadic Uzbeks named Kazakh migrated to the area where Chigil supposedly lived at this time. In addition, the Chigil lived between Issyk-Kul and the Ili River. Chigil is often shown as a separate people from the Karluks, but I have not heard about the connection with the Uyghurs at all. If we look at the genomes of the Karakhanids and Karluks of Kazakhstan, they show the greatest closeness to the Karakalpaks and Nogais, that is, they are closer to the Kazakhs than to the Uighurs and are Mongoloids.
@@The_Geographer_Maps If you look clear to Karluk and true Karakhanid they are much more closer to Uyghurs and Hazara which are Dominantly carry They genotype. karakalpak can't be Karakhanid, they live very far from it. Karakhanid khanate begins from Kashgar and then they occupied Central Asia, maybe then mixed with them
@@The_Geographer_Maps You look better genotype, and tribe of Kashgar. Nearly half population of Xinjiang belongs to Karluk DNA and Chigil is a part of it. Maybe Kashgarians belong to Chigil tribe. you better learn history
This Video of information is incorrect. Not only Slab Grave culture was forgotten, but Turkics people have existed in other cultures as well. This is confirmed by Ancient sources and archaeological research
@@decollector95 Not at all, Just search Turkmen DNA tests and you'll find that their central asian with allota of East Asian components is high af. Plus the Kyrgyz have Iranic haplogroup (R1a), while Turkmen haplogroup is way more East Euroasian (Q-M242). I've already seen Turkmens who are 60% East Asian even
@@decollector95 Again you kinda ignoring that their haplogroup is mainly Q-M242, those of Turkmenistan are a bit more mixed but if you look at the rest like the Turkmens of Afghanistan, Karakalpakstan and even in Merv((Khorasan)) you'll see they are way East Asian + "Genetics. Haplogroup Q-M242 is commonly found in Siberia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia. This haplogroup forms a large percentage of the paternal lineages of Turkmens"
@@decollector95 R1a is actually of Central Asian origin + specifically Indo - Iranic origin also known as R-M420 with his sub haplogroups like R1a-Z282 and R1a-Z93
@@decollector95 Q-M242 is actually Southern Siberian in origin, more associated with the Baikal area especially with Baikal hunter gatherers culture which Altaians and Turkmens both are descendants from, you can even ggl it btw.
One thing not correct is that the boundary in China(today's China)is not that north, it should reach the middle of China. Obviously that the north China 's land is also very suitable for nomadic life. Super vast plain. The nomadic people are living in the north China for at least 2000 years, nowadays the north Chinese are still very different from the south chinese in appearance. And today 's Turkish are not that Turkic actually, they are mix of Arabian and European. They have the turkic culture much more than the blood relationship.
They always Say they descend from oghuz turks, but the fact is that modern turks are just a mix between ancient Anatolian greeks, persians, and indigenous populations from that region who converted to islam and learn the language of a the ruling elite (oghuz turks).
As a Chuvash, I do this just for fun. Turkish peoples in the Turkic world are the same as Russians in the Slavic world. Both have big egos, imperialistic minds and a manner when they dare to teach their historical brothers how they should live and teach them their history. The Turkish peoples will like you until you start respecting yourself. There is nothing wrong with ЬuІІуіng Turkish people
Bad music + There are lots of mistakes with all of the Karluk Turks and Turkmens in Turkmenistan + You showed like there were no Anatolian Turks in Eastern Anatolia until 1750s this is obviously an error. And i dont think Kazakhs had proto-turkic ancestry more than all of other turkic people like you showed. They are mixed too. The Bashkirs have more proto-turkic ancestry than the Kazakhs.
@@singrayzada4:00. I tried searching by the title from the description (Damo - Music Turkish No Copyright 2020), but I didn't find anything related to this music.
The spread of Turkish in Anatolia seems to be a bit wrong. Western Anatolia, and North east Turkey and Eastern Thrace already had a Turkish majority/plurality before the 19th century.
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid.
@VerbalWarrior162 I see this absurd and delusional argument of yours under every comment without valid and logical reasons from the pages you read in them. Of course, by seeing such ridiculous videos, it is clear that you are happier than the intensity of the illusion 😂
This video is just ridiculous in so many levels but saying that bulgars and khazars have 0% turkic dna is just insane how tf they spoke turkic languages then and their culture was turkic as well?
The Greeks and the Celts spoke Latin and ended up practicing Roman culture through assimilation, but they aren't Latin are they? You get what I'm suggesting?
@@LadyKieraHaze it's only valid if you're trying to say that turkic speaking people can have no turkic dna in them which can be true but this whole turkic dna stuff is complete bs tbh there's no such a thing since turkic people were a mix of different tribes and ethnicities since the very beginning
Xianyun is nomadic people which inhabited in modern-day mongolia and raided the bronze age china, the information about them is small because the zhou dynasty descripted them and of for 3000 years the some sources were disappeared by the time we know only they were nomad and raided zhou dynasty
Kyrgyzstan destroyed the country established by the Uyghur people, but has never been able to control this region. The restoration of order in this region relies on the Khitan people。After the Khitan emperor's expedition, Kyrgyzstan belonged to the Khitan. During this period, Kyrgyz people have been living very well. Because during the Mongol rule, there were always wars in the Kyrgyz region. Kyrgyz people began to migrate to their current residential areas
If Turks were moved from Manchuria to Mongolia, then Turks should have lots of similar words (that was created during agricultural revolution) to Mongolic languages but Turkic languages are heavily similar to Hungarian instead of Central Asian people's languages. The fact is we see the words similar between Mongol and Turkic languages after Iron Age. Oldest words we know that exist in Turkish language is related to agricultural life,farming activities and some animal names which don't exist in Mongolia or Manchuria. When we see the DNA samples from Scythian kurgans,that show us r1az93-94 genes, people might think those people who were burried in kurgans are part of Indo-European people but according to ancient Chinese records Turks look like Caucasians,which fits in genetic researches. Also the Issyk inscriptions become more meaningful if scientists try do decipher the language according to Turkish language rules insteading of Indo-European linguistic rules. Cavalry culture has also remained among Turks but we can not see this culture's continuation in Iran or other European people. So, We have two hypotheses. 1st: Turks are assimilated Indo-Europeans.,2nd: Scythian Empire ruling class were Turks while majority of citizens were Iranian but we see the R1az93-94 genes in modern day Turkish people as well as we see it in Central Asia Turks. If Turks were assimilated Indo-Europeans,then we must congratulate the Asiatic nomads who forced thousands of people to live with Turkish culture,habbits,beliefs but in the history we see that Turks always lost their identity when they conquered a new place and where they become minorities,so this hypotesis is not logical. 2nd hypotesis is more logical according to Chinese Records saying that "Turks immigrated from west of Caspian Sea" , and Herodot's tales about Yurkae people and Amazons (women warriors which is very common in ancient Turks), and immigration of Az people around 1st century according to ancient Roman records and the scrypts we see in Scandinavia... Swedish scientists have researches about the Turks' migration and notes about Odin's migration from somewhere called Turkland. The similarity between Viking Runes and Turkic runes all across Asia is an evidence for this migration. If this Altay-Tanrı Mountains hypotesis were true,then Turkish language should have lots of similarity in prehistoric era words with Mongolian and other central Asia local languages,but with the light of philology and genetic researches,what we see is a migration from Urals to inner Asia. Even the word "tarım" (farming) is one of the oldest words in Turkish language and not similar to any Mongol-Manchu language word. If Turks were Asiatic nomads, then all those words related to farming activities should be derived from neighbouring people's languages but we don't see such phenomenon in Turkish,instead we see too many similarity wih Hungarian.
Proto Turks mostly carry the Y-DNA haplo group N,C and Q, while Mongolians were heavily C..... All mongoloids race though N,C,Q were North East Asians mongoloids race
@@Kazakbay Genetic results show they are indo-iranian, The kazakh tribes that close to xiongnu and early medieval turks these kypchaks except kara-kypchaks, argyn, uwaq, jetiru tribes, syrgeli, oshaqty and ysty( more 70% proto-turkic ancesstry, kangly, kara-kipchaks and naimans of central kazakhstan close to sarmatian 60-70% western steppe herder origin), other tribes have turko-mongolian(50-60 proto turkic(xiongnu) and 40-50 mongolic(xianbei) such as alshyn, naiman, kerey and mongolian origin such as shapyrashty, dulat, yellow-uysin, alban, suwan and shanyshqyly who have khamag-mongolian origin they have 40-30% proto-turkic origin(xiongnu) and 50-60 mongolic(xianbei)
@@tanhukim9963moğolcu arkadaşım türkler moğollaela akraba olamaz dil açısından bakarsan benzerlik yok türklerin ilk çıktığı yer moğolistan değil bu günki hazar denizinin kuzeyi kazan bölgesi artık bilim dünyasında kabul edilen de bu.
@@ulgen1174 Türklerle Moğollar akrabadır demedim. Benzer dnaları taşır dedim. Aynı dnaları taşımak aynı ırk olunduğu anlamına gelmiyor. Türkler kazandan çıkma değil, kuzeydoğu asyalıdır. Kazandan çıkma yalanını Avrupa'ya yakın olabilmek için uyduruyorlar. Kim kabul ettiyse yalan dolan.
Turkey's western and Mediterranean coasts may be darker in color. For an average Mediterranean and Aegean Turk, these rates easily exceed 25%-30%. Just like the Northern Turkmens in Turkmenistan. And as an added bonus, Turkics are not 100% East Eurasian, so Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan shouldn't be this dark either. If we are talking about Turkic genetics, it also carries a serious Mongolian and Siberian heritage from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Just like a Turkmen carries Caucasian and similar heritage.
The ancestors of the Turks of Turkey conquered Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq and Arabia in the 1030s from the east of the Caspian Sea, that is, the territory of Turkmenistan, and established the "Seljuk Empire". They defeated the Byzantine Emperor in 1071 and settled in Anatolia. After the Seljuk Empire collapsed, it was divided into many parts. Then the Ottoman Empire in the west. In the east, the Safavid Empire was born again, and the Ottoman Empire was dissolved in 1919 after the First World War, and the Republic of Turkey was established on the remaining lands.
good to see another video of yours!
Very nice! I liked your video about Uralic peoples!
You also have a good video about Uralic languages!
I expected to see Aqqoyunlu, Qaraqoyunlus on Eastern Anatolia. It would be good if you added them. Most of them was Nomadic Turcomans. Later some of it converted to Shia and migrated to todays South Azerbaijan under Safavid Rule, Others stayed as Sunni and migrated to Western Anatolia via Ottoman Policies on 18th century. Anyways thats actually a great video keep it up brother!
Aqqoyunlu and Qaraqoyunlu was azerbaijani medieval states
@@Azerchayforever221 I Know Brother and They are Turkic too
@@limonya видимо у них нет тюркских аутосом просто, да и гаплотипов изначальных тюрок типа N1b2 у азербайджанцев мало (зато были у бакинских ханов) и у малочисленных потомков сельджуков в Турции как Денишмениды . Гены персов греков курдов и талышей и армян всё вымыли.
@@ЧеремисЕльцовI don't think Turkish DNA is N DNA.
@@tanhukim9963Династия Бакинских ханов и династия Данишменидов это N , они сельджуки самые старые.
The word Tiele is a distorted Chinese spelling of the word Türk, who are the ancestors of the Uyghurs.
They were also known in Chinese sources as Tingling
In Latin sources, they were mentioned as the Torcilingi and Torci people.
Because of the height of their chariots, they were called Gaoche people, meaning "those of high chariots."
you dealt with these people as if they were several peoples.
As for the Göktürks, they were the descendants of the southern Xiongnu.
Xuinu is also a distorted way of saying Hunu. Group names for peoples the chinese encountered in antiquity make a lot more sense if read in classical chinese rather than modern madarin.
Hi im an uyghur van you tell me more about this? How far does my nation go back ?
@@anyarasan8529 The first unmistakable evidence of Turkic history begins with the Huns/Xiongnu. There are theories about civilizations that preceded this, but there are not yet enough archaeological findings to provide convincing proof that these people were Turkic or that the confederations were governed by a Turkic ruling class, as in other confederations.
However, the Huns have now become unmistakable with all the evidence:
The names of Xiongnu and Western Hun leaders are almost indisputably Turkic. Additionally, there are other findings that strengthen this connection.
Khan Dikkiz (Dengizich - Deniz) Dish/Plate
A dish with runes was translated with the following text:
Kinkeg Dikkiz ükü kässä
Kiji sax sax saxynil gür Tänrig
Translation:
"Fear the blow of King Dikkiz the Wise! Retreat to the God beyond this world!"
Sura Rune Inscription
Another inscription, attributed to the Xiongnu/Huns, reads as follows:
(i)g känč : ap(a) kurčik : sal aranģï : eenč uğ(a)
Translation:
"Ah young Apa Kurčik, let yourself rest in peaceful sleep in the coffin/burial / rest in peaceful sleep in the coffin/burial!"
Chinese Historical Mention
A Chinese historian noted the following words he heard in the Xiongnu language. In 329 CE, a Xiongnu leader asked Fo-t’u-teng for help regarding an upcoming battle against Liu Yao. After a ritual, he spoke a prophecy in the Ho language:
siu-k’i t’i-li-kang puh-koh kü-t’u-tang
Interpretation:
"The army will march and capture Liu Yao."
Meaning of the terms:
siu-k’i: "army"
t’i-li-kang: "march"
puh-koh: "Liu Yao" (his title)
kü-t’u-tang: "capture"
Transcriptions by Sinologists
Bernhard Karlgren: siog tieg t’iei lied kang b’uok kuk g’iu t’uk-tang
Edwin G. Pulleyblank: sux-keh the-let-kang buk-kok goh-thok-tang
Turkic Reconstructions
G.J. Ramstedt: Süke talıkıng (talıkang) bügüg (ügeg) tutang - "Go to war, capture the enemy leader!"
Talat Tekin: Sü:ke tılıkang bugukgı tuktang - "Go to war, capture Buguk (the leader)."
Significance
This expression represents one of the earliest known examples of a Turkic language and provides valuable insight into the linguistic and cultural interactions between the Xiongnu and Chinese civilizations.
Xiongnu and Turkic Connections
Similarities in Runes
The runes of the Xiongnu are nearly identical to the Göktürk runic script.
Mentions in Chinese Sources
Book of Jin: Mentions 19 Southern Xiongnu tribes who entered Former Yan, the 14th of which was the Alat (Ch. 賀賴 Helai ~ 賀蘭 Helan ~ 曷剌 Hela). Alat translates to "pinto horse" (Ch. 駁馬 ~ 駮馬 Boma) in Old Turkic.
Book of Zhou, History of the Northern Dynasties, Tongdian, New Book of Tang: Mention that the Göktürks and the ruling Ashina clan were part of the Xiongnu confederation.
Uyghur Khagans: Claimed descent from the Xiongnu.
Book of Wei: States that the Yueban descended from the Northern Xiongnu and that their language and customs were similar to those of the Tiele.
Names and Meanings
Alat (Turkic: Ala or Alagchin): Means "pinto horse." This tribal name appears in both Chinese annals and later Turkic tribes.
The Xiongnu referred to heaven (天): Chēnglí (擇犁), a Chinese transcription of Tengri.
Ruling Clans
Luandi/Xulianti Clan: This was the ruling clan of the Xiongnu from the 3rd century BCE to the 4th century CE. The word Luandi comes from the Chinese Book of Han, while Xulianti is from the Book of Later Han.
Chinese researchers reconstruct Old Chinese Luandi as Hala-yundluğ, meaning "tribe with pinto horses" in an early Turkic dialect.
Further Details
Lanhai Wei and Hui Li: Reconstruct the Old Chinese pronunciation of 挛鞮 as lyuan-tlïɣ, originating from an earlier form 虚连题 (Hala-yundluɣ). This resulted from a historical sound shift where h- disappeared. The roots hala (colorful), yund (horse), and the participle suffix -luɣ combined to mean "tribe with pinto horses" in an early Turkic dialect. This can be identified with the historical Ulayundluğ tribe (ALAT TRIBE).
The conquest of the same clan by the Xue in the 4th century CE led to the Xueyantuo. The Xueyantuo were an ancient Tiele tribe and khanate in Northeast Asia. They were once vassals of the Göktürks but later allied with the Tang dynasty against the Eastern Göktürks.
Alat Tribe
The Alat tribe (also known as Ala-at, Ala, Alachin, Alagchin, Alchin, Alchi, Alayontli, Ulayundluğ, meaning "pinto horse" or "spotted horse"). Chinese names include Boma 駁馬 or 駮馬, Helai 賀賴, Helan 賀蘭, Hela 曷剌, and Bila 弊剌.
In the old Turkic lexicon, the meaning of "pinto horse" is expressed with terms such as ala or alagchin, which are still used in compound expressions today. The Tang Huiyao mentions a tribe named Geluozhiya (葛羅枝牙) directly after the Ashina tribe, with a tamga that was later also found among the Oghuz tribe.
Since the Oghuz (Turkmen) tribe of Alayontli has the same tamga as the Boma (Alat) tribe, and the name also translates to "pinto horse," Zuev is convinced that Alayontli is the same tribe as Alat.
Conclusion
The evidence that the Xiongnu leaders were of Turkic origin is overwhelming. Their language, runes, religious terms, and the connections with later Turkic tribes such as the Göktürks and Oghuz support this conclusion. According to Chinese historians, there is no doubt about the origin of the Xiongnu; only Western historians have proposed alternative theories, which are becoming increasingly untenable.
In several Chinese sources, it is also mentioned that "Chanyu," the title for the Xiongnu leaders, was also given to later Tujue (Turkic) leaders. "Chanyu" is sometimes transcribed as "Tarkan." The full title is Chengli Gutu Chanyu = Tengri Çocuğu Tarkan. This means "Son of god/heaven _[INSERT NAME]_ (Tar)khan. A new Turkic stone was found of the gökturk empire by the way and it word for word contains the title "son of god/heaven".
The Xiongnu empire had a military structure that showed many similarities with later Turkic and Mongolian armies. Their army was organized in a hierarchical system with different divisions:
Tuqi Kings (Wise Kings) of Left and Right: Directly under the Leader, these kings governed the left (eastern) and right (western) wings of the empire. The Tuqi King of the Left Wing was usually the heir apparent. The word Tuqi is a direct translation of the Turkic (j)ükü, meaning "wise," which literally reflects the Chinese concept of "wise prince."
Guli (Ku-li) and Military Commanders: Officials who oversaw military operations, with counterparts on both the left and right sides. The term Guli (Ku-li) is related to the Turkic word Kolu, meaning "arms" or "wings" of the army, referring to a military division or branch of the forces.
i love that you make these kinds of videos. Keep it up! Also can you do Germanic next?
Fun fact: Most of the tribes shown in video has no DNA samples taken from them.
But ofc when it comes to Turk peoples it has an "Turkicmeter". Yet no IE discussions has such a teatment. Plus, Khazars have %0 Turkic DNA? what?
Data on many ancient Turkic populations, due to lack of genetic data or due to their diversity within the population, are taken mainly at the expense of modern populations.
Data from the remains of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the Kharkov region belonging to the Khazars show identity with the Caucasian Alans.
media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
And by the way I have IEmeter
just a video made by a Kazakh😂
@@yakutia159he is belarus, And in general, this is nonsense, the history of the Turks is so much rewritten and distorted, making the Turks Bulgars, Khazars, Huns, and others not Turks, without recognizing that during the guns and the domination of the Turkic Khaganates, the common Turkic language was like English for Asia. Now all Turks are divided, calling them Turkicized, making stupid arguments, calling them not Turks.
I agree 100%, such a glaring double standard and a ploy used to create division amongst the Turkic people.
@@aruuito it was distorted so much deeper than you imagine. Huns were like the third Turkic conquest of Europe, Avars were the fourth (and they are rewriting even those facst). Yamnaya is the first Turkic conquest of Europe.
Turkey is wrong according to the map which is based on "Turkic ancestry" Which sample of Turkic dna results did you use? For example, some DNA sample results show that Xiongnu samples had %60-70 east asian and siberian(Dodecad k12b), Gokturks had around %80 and medieval Turks(Kara-khanid) had around %45. So, Modern Turks in Turkey has %8-22 which is changeable from region to region. So, Middle-North Black Sea region should be higher in color and western Turkey must be higher than central and eastern anatolia. According to medieval Turkic results, Turks in Turkey must be %25-50 based on regions.
Except those, Thanks for the video, i really liked it.
My mistake by the way, I only based the results on "east asian and siberian" There are other things in a DNA test(gedrosia,north european etc.) But generally two things i mentioned is mostly used for the results to compare.
Samsar47, sen samsar değil tam bir Kürtçü sansar olmalısın.imal ettiğin ima'lı önermelerden, zihninin gerisinden nasıl bir Kürtçülük parıltısı geçtiği okunabiliyor. video-yapımcısı şöyle deseydi eminim ki çok sevinirdin: "Türkiye de hiç Türk yoktur, bütün Türkiye Türkleri aslında Kürt'tür."
@@cevdetaygun5969 aynennnnn gardaşımm kesin kürtçü falanımdır. ingilizcen a0 seviyede olduğundan bi sikim anlayamamışsın.
نسبة أتراك في تركيا أقل من 2٪ .... 96٪ من سكان جمهورية تركيا مزيفة هم يونانين و أرمن و أكراد و عرب تم تتريكهم ...... و للمعلومة لغة تركية لجمهورية تركيا هي لغة هجينة خليط من لغة عربية و فارسية
Greeks aren't Turkic
Amazing how Mongols are more Turkic than a lot of modern Turkic nations. But it is no wonder on a second thought because Mongolia was where the proto Turks originated.
Exactly mongols except kalmyks didn't really didn't move any were else TURKIC PEOPLE on the udder hand did This is way you will find TURKIC spiking people from Siberia to Europe all the way to Africa
Another guy who thinks that all Turkic are Turkish
@@meirhanIX Turk comes from Turkic anyway.
@@Ağadede_Yabgualtai was inhabited by indo-european people,turks come later
The population of the Mongols is 3 million today. The population of the Turks is 200 million. The Mongols were never very populous. The power of Genghis Khan comes from the Turks because Genghis Khan is related to the Turks and the Mongols. Mongolia is not where the Turks come from. The place where the Turks come from is Siberia, not Mongolia Turks lived in China, Mongalia, India, Pakistan, Iran and many other countries, but their place of origin is Siberian Altai.
Can you comment the exact Proto-Turkic ancestry percentage of Central Asian Turks (Qazaqs, Uzbeks, Kirghizs, Turkmens, Karakalpaks, Tuvans and Uighurs) Volgan Turks (Bashkirs, Siberian Tatars, Volga Tatars and Chuvash), and Mongolic-speaking people?
This is the earliest detailed names of the peoples of the region and they are from Russian Primary Chronicle.
Most of these peoples are not on the English Wikipedia, but are on the Russian Wikipedia.
Here is their Russian name: Сумь, Емь, Чудь.
@@The_Geographer_MapsWhy are you posting the names of uralic people?
@@The_Geographer_Maps eh I asked the exact Proto-Turkic percentages of some Turkic people, why are you commenting this?
Uyghurs were the first to be annexed by the Turks. But these people are composed of many tribes. Some are willing, while others always launch rebellions. The Chinese emperor supported those who insisted on independence and then defeated the Turks. Then the Uyghurs reestablished a state that was subservient to China. When they wanted to betray the Chinese emperor, the emperor sent troops to destroy his tribe. One of the Uyghur generals had been helping the Chinese emperor in war, and eventually left with his tribe to become a vassal of the Turks when China was declining. Finally, due to internal turmoil among the Turks, China joined forces with them to annihilate them. They established their own country and brought their former allies to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. These people who were driven away by them surrendered to the Arabs again. Later, due to the internal turmoil among the Uyghur people, the country they established was destroyed by the Kyrgyz people. But Kyrgyz people cannot control the tribes in this area.
China joined forces with Uyghurs and Qarluq people to eliminate the Turkic state. Uyghurs established their own country and drove their former allies to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. These Qarluq people who were driven away by them surrendered to the Arabs again. Later, due to internal turmoil among the Uyghur people, the country they established was destroyed by the Kyrgyz people. But Kyrgyz people cannot control the tribes in the region
Bulgars 0%? What is your source for this? There are a few samples thought to be Bulgar, and they have as much East Eurasian component as the Bashkirs.
The elite of the Avar Kaganate from the 8th to 9th centuries shows the emergence of a new genetic component associated with the North Caucasus, apparently from the Bulgars. Moreover, this component lacks East Asian origin.
Article:
Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs2.jpg
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg
In addition, samples from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the 8th to 10th centuries in the Kharkov region, apparently belonging to the Khazars, show the identity to the North Caucasians.
media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Also, my calculations on Vahaduo about Balkan populations show the absence of East Asian ancestry not from Turkish, but a good presence of ancestry from the North Caucasus.
Albanian Chechen Kazakh Slovakian Turkish_Antalya
Gagauz 66.5 9.8 0.2 19.5 4.1
Bulgarian 60.9 4.9 0.3 30.4 3.4
Macedonian 66.6 1.9 0.0 31.5 0.0
Serbian 49.9 2.2 0.2 47.5 0.3
Also, non-Fino-Ugric East Asian ancestry is absent among the populations of the Volga Bulgaria region which were not influenced by the Kipchaks.
Chechen Erzya Kazakh Mansi
Chuvash 6.5 57.6 1.3 34.6
Udmurt 10.7 48.2 0.0 41.1
Mari 1.7 49.2 0.0 49.2
Tatar_Kazan 13.0 59.8 13.8 13.4
@@The_Geographer_Maps it's known for a fact that Khazars ADOPTED the Saltovo-Mayaki culture, they were NOT their descendants. Plus how exactly did Ding-Ling people had %0 Turkic? The Chinese sources do not differentiate them from Han Chinese by appearance. Also, the *New Book* written by old Chinese historians say that they intermarried with Yenisei Kirghizs which proves that they got their Indo-European influence later.
Bulgarians are definitely not a Slavic people. Unfortunately, you are a people who have forgotten their identity.
@@The_Geographer_Maps
⬇️ Hun-Avar-Hungarian genetic article
Summary:
265 ancient samples have been analyzed
successive migration waves of populations related to Huns - Avars and Magyars from Asia to Europe... (the reasons for the large number of haplogroup R1 holders in Europe)
Most people (maximum 1.5 thousand years ago) ... their ancestors were inside Europe (maximum 3.2 thousand years ago) (but they have Asian origin, which indicates the migration of people carrying haplogroup R1 to Europe)
The Huns inside Europe have the origin of East Asia
Huns and Avars have the same ancestry
In the samples, the genome related to Iranic populations is not found, and their initial migration was from East Asia, probably modern Mongolia
Huns - Avars and Magyars carry the haplogroup R1a-Z94 (the same haplogroup that was discovered in the Scythians)
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35617951/
⬇️ Avars genetic essay
The Avars were a branch of the Ughurs, which itself is a Turkic-speaking ethnic group
Most of them were Turkic-speaking peoples, such as Utigor-Kutrigor or Unughor, who are called Bulgarians in the writings
The word Bulghar is a Turkic word, but the population that has this name probably has nothing to do with Turkics, and it is more likely that there are some ethnic Turkics in this population
www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00267-7
These are more authentic academic articles and sources than your nonsense, I'll post the sources again if needed. Based on genetics and subgroups, they were also strongly related to eastern Turkic tribes, I'm not sure if you've looked at the Y haplogroups between Turkics peoples. Your sources only categorize Turkics as East Eurasian and Mongoloid without any logical and valid reasons
Bulgars were not turkic despite temporarily speaking a distant form of turkic language
2:10
The Khazars Convert To Judaism ✡
I Am Jewish With Turkic Khazar Origin
I Love Khazaria And The Turkic History
Tehlikeli bir durum 🈴
I'm glad you haven't forgotten about us, Saha. But we cannot be only 40% Turks., we take our history back to shortly before the 6th century. According to any Diagrams of Turkic families, I mean ANY diagrams, we are included as the second oldest living Turks after the Chuvash, who are from the Bulgarian branch(You can see it in the language too). The Kurykans lived in the 6th - 11th centuries, and before him we had common Turkic-Mongolic tribes like a Batyly, Khatygyn, Chordu, Baydy, Amydai etc.
In our language, 47% (half) are Turkic, 27% Mongolian, 6% common Turkic-Mongolian, 10% Tungusic-Manchu, 10%(≈9,7%) of unknown origin.
Among 47% of Turkic part: 26% Ancient Turkic, 53% Medieval Turkic, 21% Modern Turkic.
Our genetics also stands out for its age. I mean even the Mongols himself are MORE TURKIC than us??? Like WTF????
So 40% is too incorrect.
Thank you brother, I agree with your opinion, it is a correct explanation.
Saha u mean Sakha?
Your dominated haplogroup N speaks for herself.
🤣
@@ahemenidov1900yeah, they had too much mixing with tungus people.
I'd like to see Germanic or Italic next!
Great video.
@@xdd87 not gonna lie that's not relevant to me eshberok.
@@noahtylerpritchett2682 What's eshbrok? Lmao. I replied according to your own other comments.
@@xdd87 eshberok means foreigner in proto-germanic.
Hungarians are as turkic as the English are french ngl
English and french are indo european
@@turan2815 then like the Basque and Spanish
@@bizzleogria spanish are indo-european and basque are isolated
Also hungarians are uralic no connection with turkic
@@scarymonster5541actually they had 10 percent proto-turkic ancestry
@@polis1705 i don't think majority of them have it
Correction: Pakistan has over 2 million Hazaras who are Turko-Mongols. Quetta, Bolachistan has entire neighbourhoods. Hazara Town, Mariabad are Hazara dominant with some of then found in Islamabad. You should have shown Hazaras living in Bolachistan with a 'blob' !!!
Gen. Musa Khan, Air Marshal Ali Changzi are two famous examples.
@@super200-w3othey are. Go check their dna
А как вы определили, что хазары тюрки? По узким глазам что-ли? 😆😆😆
Why do you think that ancient Turkc-speaking Bulgars had 0% of Turks? Maybe, had they about 10% of Turks?
Genomes from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the Kharkov region that belong to the Khazars show the identity to modern North Caucasians.
media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
In addition, the genomes of the Late Avar elite of the Danube show a component associated with the North Caucasians.
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg
Also, modern descendants of the Volga Bulgars and especially the Kazan Tatars show admixture from the North Caucasus. Bulgarians, Romanians and especially Gagauzians also show admixture associated with the North Caucasus
i.imgur.com/bYBQ9cy.png
@@The_Geographer_Maps🤡
@@alexangelo1998 no, probably more than%90. This guy is liar.
@@The_Geographer_Maps DUDE HE WANTED A SOURCE AND YOU SHARED EVERY IRRELEVANT THINGS. JUST DON'T SPREAD FALSE INFORMATION.
@@Raidon8537 Yüzde 1 bile Türk değil Bulgarlar. Yunan ve Slav karışımı, Slav toplumudur. Bulgar kabileleri antik dönemde oraya isimlerini vermişler. İnsanların o isim ile hiç bir alakaları yok. Bulgarlar Slav halkıdır.
Thanks for map
Thank you for not including Bulgars as Turkic people, finally somebody did research outside of inaccurate wikipedia. Thank you.
Proto Bulgarians are of Turkic origin, my friend. The name of Kubrat Khan is a Turkish name and is even mentioned in the Orkhon inscriptions of the Gokturks. Byzantine historian Theophanes calls the great Bulgarian state "patria onoguria". Onogurs are a Turkish tribe. This symbol, used by the Proto-Bulgarians (IYI), was also used by the Turkish Kayı tribe and the Bulgarian Dulo dynasty. and among the ancient Bulgarian gods there is a god called tangra or taagra. In Turks, he has a name similar to the god named Tengri. Evidence of Tangra includes the Madara Column, preserved at the National Archaeological Institute, which has a museum in Sofia. It bears a half-erased ancient Greek inscription reading Tangra - TAGGRA ("GG" pronounced "NG" in Greek). As a matter of fact, Nikepheros (Byzantine Emperor M.G.) stated that Kubrat, the founder of the Great Bulgarian State, was the "lord of the Onogurs". I mentioned above that the Onogurs are a Turkish tribe. As additional historical evidence, Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos (4th emperor of the Macedonian Dynasty, reigned 913-959, M.G.) recorded that the Bulgarians called themselves Onogur Bulgarians.” We call the old Bulgarians Turks. When the Proto Bulgarians came to today's Balkans, they established a common state with seven Slavic tribes. but peoples of Slavic and Thracian origin. Their numbers were greater than the proto-Bulgarian population, and Turkic Bulgarians assimilated among them over time.
@First of all, Bulgarians never used the title “Khan” and there is no evidence of such, every single inscription mentions the Bulgar title “Kanasubigi” meaning “Ruler by God”. Secondly there is no evidence to support bulgars were tengrist. The only “evidence” is a mostly destroyed unintelligible carving which some people assume would say Tangra, which is highly unreliable. The names were also of Iranic origin/Scythian, not Turkic,and another example would be Kanasubigi Krum. The first ever recorded uses of the “IYI” symbol have been found in ancient Thracian carvings that long predate the Turkic migrations as well as the Kayi tribe, and it is literally identical to the symbol used by the bulgars. Lastly and arguably the most important point is the genetic studies on bulgars. The genetic studies show that bulgars have absolutely no eastern Eurasian origins specifically the Altai mountains. Instead it links directly to western Eurasian origins which would be Indo Europeans (Scythians), places like the Pontic Caspian steppe for example. Keep in mind all of this is said in relation to the period before the Turkic migrations. The only argument really left would be the distant form of Turkic language the bulgars temporarily spoke which is another discussion. To conclude, realistically the origin of the Bulgars is Scythian.
@@The_Big_G_765Kanas u bigi or kanas ubigi is a title of Turkish origin. The names Kan, Khan, kagan, kahan come from the same origin. This title can also be given to state administrators, tribal leaders or lower-ranking administrators, and the word bigi is Turkish. It has the same phonetic sequence as the words Bey, Beğ, bek, beg, atabeg.
There are also words sü bigi and sü basi in Turkish, meaning army commander and military leader. While you reject my claim of tangra as a falsified inscription, why can't you respond to the onogurous findings of the historians of that period? When you can't answer, you resort to the evasive excuse that it was falsified? It has the title İçhirgu Çila. *iç" is a word of Altai origin.
For example, he has the title kavhan and kavkhan. It is mentioned even in the Orhun inscriptions of the Göktürks. He is a first-degree civil servant.
You couldn't produce any evidence that the titles are of Iranian origin? By saying Scythian, you will prove that it is not just Scythian.
Onogurs were one of the important elements in the establishment of both the Great Bulgarian and Danube Bulgarian states. As a matter of fact, Nikepheros (Byzantine Emperor, M.G.) stated that Kubrat, the founder of the Great Bulgarian State, was the "lord of the Onogurs". The Byzantine emperor says, do you not accept this?
The Byzantine historian named Theophanes says that the khan kubrat was the ruler of "Patria onoguria (the land of onogur)". Theophanes is a court historian who personally saw the kubrat alive. Couldn't you answer these?
These are primary sources and give important clues, but you couldn't say anything about them? Because it was true. You couldn't refuse.
There is no tamga of the Dulo dynasty in Thracian carvings, which is an unfounded statement. (IYI) This symbol exists in the Kayi tribe and the Dulo dynasty. It is a Turkish symbol.
And Bulgarian names are of Turkish origin. The name Kubrat is mentioned in Orkhon inscriptions, and I even write the expression (YORuYOR: TİYIN: KÜ: eŞiDiP: BALIKDaKI: TaGIKMİŞ: TaGDakI: İNMiŞ: TIRiLiP: YeTMiŞ: eR: BOLMIŞ: TeŊRİ: KÜÇ: BİRTÜK: ÜÇiN: KaŊım: KaGaN: SÜSİ: BÖRİ: TeG: eRMiŞ: YaGISI: KOYN: TeG: eRMiŞ: İLGeRÜ: KURİGaRU: SÜLeP: TIRMiŞ: 🕊️🕊️KUBRaTMIŞ🕊️🕊️: KaMaGI:) go research this.
The name of Kubrat's son, Batbayan, is also mentioned in Turkish, *bay means "rich" and *bayan means wealth, and this is mentioned in the orhun inscriptions, tonyukuk inscriptions, and kultigin inscriptions. There are also two Turkish Avar kagans named *Bayan.
The name Krum is also Turkish. Also known as *korum,*kurum it means,rocky,rocky area". In Iranian languages, there are no names written with two consonants but pronounced and written with a single vowel. This is against the nature of Iranian languages. If you had any knowledge of languages, you would know this.
I only agree that Khan Asparuh's name is of Iranian origin.
Tangra has not been falsified to any great extent, and how can you misrepresent that part in an evasive way and you know it is incomplete, the only part that has been falsified is this one.
The middle of the word (TA**RA) has just been deleted, but linguists say that the middle of it will be filled with gg or ng suffixes. Because there were no gods with this name in Scythian or Iranian mythologies.
You cannot prove the Scythian origin by not responding scientifically to any claim, not presenting an argument, and simply rejecting it. You didn't even respond to the onogur claim. We don't see you as Turks anyway, we accept kubrat, krum, batbayan, omurtag as Turks. Asparuh and his entourage were culturally assimilated among the dense Slavic and Thracian population. Boris's conversion to Christianity in 864 resulted in the extinction of the culture of the proto-Bulgarians of Turkic origin.
@@The_Big_G_765Kanas u bigi or kanas ubigi is a title of Turkish origin. The names Kan, Khan, kagan, kahan come from the same origin. This title can also be given to state administrators, tribal leaders or lower-ranking administrators, and the word bigi is Turkish. It has the same phonetic sequence as the words Bey, Beğ, bek, beg, atabeg.
There are also words sü bigi and sü basi in Turkish, meaning army commander and military leader. While you reject my claim of tangra as a falsified inscription, why can't you respond to the onogurous findings of the historians of that period? When you can't answer, you resort to the evasive excuse that it was falsified? It has the title İçhirgu Çila. *iç" is a word of Altai origin.
For example, he has the title kavhan and kavkhan. It is mentioned even in the Orhun inscriptions of the Göktürks. He is a first-degree civil servant.
You couldn't produce any evidence that the titles are of Iranian origin? By saying Scythian, you will prove that it is not just Scythian.
Onogurs were one of the important elements in the establishment of both the Great Bulgarian and Danube Bulgarian states. As a matter of fact, Nikepheros (Byzantine Emperor, M.G.) stated that Kubrat, the founder of the Great Bulgarian State, was the "lord of the Onogurs". The Byzantine emperor says, do you not accept this?
The Byzantine historian named Theophanes says that the khan kubrat was the ruler of "Patria onoguria (the land of onogur)". Theophanes is a court historian who personally saw the kubrat alive. Couldn't you answer these?
These are primary sources and give important clues, but you couldn't say anything about them? Because it was true. You couldn't refuse.
There is no tamga of the Dulo dynasty in Thracian carvings, which is an unfounded statement. (IYI) This symbol exists in the Kayi tribe and the Dulo dynasty. It is a Turkish symbol.
And Bulgarian names are of Turkish origin. The name Kubrat is mentioned in Orkhon inscriptions, and I even write the expression (YORuYOR: TİYIN: KÜ: eŞiDiP: BALIKDaKI: TaGIKMİŞ: TaGDakI: İNMiŞ: TIRiLiP: YeTMiŞ: eR: BOLMIŞ: TeŊRİ: KÜÇ: BİRTÜK: ÜÇiN: KaŊım: KaGaN: SÜSİ: BÖRİ: TeG: eRMiŞ: YaGISI: KOYN: TeG: eRMiŞ: İLGeRÜ: KURİGaRU: SÜLeP: TIRMiŞ: 🕊️🕊️KUBRaTMIŞ🕊️🕊️: KaMaGI:) go research this.
The name of Kubrat's son, Batbayan, is also mentioned in Turkish, *bay means "rich" and *bayan means wealth, and this is mentioned in the orhun inscriptions, tonyukuk inscriptions, and kultigin inscriptions. There are also two Turkish Avar kagans named *Bayan.
The name Krum is also Turkish. Also known as *korum,*kurum it means,rocky,rocky area". In Iranian languages, there are no names written with two consonants but pronounced and written with a single vowel. This is against the nature of Iranian languages. If you had any knowledge of languages, you would know this.
I only agree that Khan Asparuh's name is of Iranian origin.
Tangra has not been falsified to any great extent, and how can you misrepresent that part in an evasive way and you know it is incomplete, the only part that has been falsified is this one.
The middle of the word (TA**RA) has just been deleted, but linguists say that the middle of it will be filled with gg or ng suffixes. Because there were no gods with this name in Scythian or Iranian mythologies.
You cannot prove the Scythian origin by not responding scientifically to any claim, not presenting an argument, and simply rejecting it. You didn't even respond to the onogur claim. We don't see you as Turks anyway, we accept kubrat, krum, batbayan, omurtag as Turks. Asparuh and his entourage were culturally assimilated among the dense Slavic and Thracian population. Boris's conversion to Christianity in 864 resulted in the extinction of the culture of the proto-Bulgarians of Turkic origin.
@@The_Big_G_765Kanas u bigi or kanas ubigi is a title of Turkish origin. The names Kan, Khan, kagan, kahan come from the same origin. This title can also be given to state administrators, tribal leaders or lower-ranking administrators, and the word bigi is Turkish. It has the same phonetic sequence as the words Bey, Beğ, bek, beg, atabeg.
There are also words sü bigi and sü basi in Turkish, meaning army commander and military leader. While you reject my claim of tangra as a falsified inscription, why can't you respond to the onogurous findings of the historians of that period? When you can't answer, you resort to the evasive excuse that it was falsified? It has the title İçhirgu Çila. *iç" is a word of Altai origin.
For example, he has the title kavhan and kavkhan. It is mentioned even in the Orhun inscriptions of the Göktürks. He is a first-degree civil servant.
You couldn't produce any evidence that the titles are of Iranian origin? By saying Scythian, you will prove that it is not just Scythian.
Onogurs were one of the important elements in the establishment of both the Great Bulgarian and Danube Bulgarian states. As a matter of fact, Nikepheros (Byzantine Emperor, M.G.) stated that Kubrat, the founder of the Great Bulgarian State, was the "lord of the Onogurs". The Byzantine emperor says, do you not accept this?
The Byzantine historian named Theophanes says that the khan kubrat was the ruler of "Patria onoguria (the land of onogur)". Theophanes is a court historian who personally saw the kubrat alive. Couldn't you answer these?
These are primary sources and give important clues, but you couldn't say anything about them? Because it was true. You couldn't refuse.
There is no tamga of the Dulo dynasty in Thracian carvings, which is an unfounded statement. (IYI) This symbol exists in the Kayi tribe and the Dulo dynasty. It is a Turkish symbol.
And Bulgarian names are of Turkish origin. The name Kubrat is mentioned in Orkhon inscriptions, and I even write the expression (YORuYOR: TİYIN: KÜ: eŞiDiP: BALIKDaKI: TaGIKMİŞ: TaGDakI: İNMiŞ: TIRiLiP: YeTMiŞ: eR: BOLMIŞ: TeŊRİ: KÜÇ: BİRTÜK: ÜÇiN: KaŊım: KaGaN: SÜSİ: BÖRİ: TeG: eRMiŞ: YaGISI: KOYN: TeG: eRMiŞ: İLGeRÜ: KURİGaRU: SÜLeP: TIRMiŞ: 🕊️🕊️KUBRaTMIŞ🕊️🕊️: KaMaGI:) go research this.
The name of Kubrat's son, Batbayan, is also mentioned in Turkish, *bay means "rich" and *bayan means wealth, and this is mentioned in the orhun inscriptions, tonyukuk inscriptions, and kultigin inscriptions. There are also two Turkish Avar kagans named *Bayan.
The name Krum is also Turkish. Also known as *korum,*kurum it means,rocky,rocky area". In Iranian languages, there are no names written with two consonants but pronounced and written with a single vowel. This is against the nature of Iranian languages. If you had any knowledge of languages, you would know this.
I only agree that Khan Asparuh's name is of Iranian origin.
Tangra has not been falsified to any great extent, and how can you misrepresent that part in an evasive way and you know it is incomplete, the only part that has been falsified is this one.
The middle of the word (TA**RA) has just been deleted, but linguists say that the middle of it will be filled with gg or ng suffixes. Because there were no gods with this name in Scythian or Iranian mythologies.
You cannot prove the Scythian origin by not responding scientifically to any claim, not presenting an argument, and simply rejecting it. You didn't even respond to the onogur claim. We don't see you as Turks anyway, we accept kubrat, krum, batbayan, omurtag as Turks. Asparuh and his entourage were culturally assimilated among the dense Slavic and Thracian population. Boris's conversion to Christianity in 864 resulted in the extinction of the culture of the proto-Bulgarians of Turkic origin.
Excellent video, what surprised me was that Bulgharic branch (Sabir, Chuvash, Khazars) has negligible p-Turkic DNA. Were the nomads really that outnumbered?
Culturally, anthropologically, and genetically, the Bulghars were Sarmatians, namely Alans, spreading from the Caucasus from the beginning of CE. numerous waves of Türks eventually Turkified the local Sarmatians.
@@The_Geographer_Maps No, Bulgars have been a Turkic people from the beginning, genetically, culturally and anthropologically.
@@The_Geographer_Maps Where did that %40 Mongoloid ancestry of Bulgars come from then?
@@x-error404alphaepicfellsan9 Mongol and Mongoloid are modern terms. The ancient Mongols of Genghis Khan are the Turks. But we do not deny that modern Mongols have the dna of the Turks, since we are nomads and lived together.
@@The_Geographer_Maps "Culturally, anthropologically, and genetically, the Bulghars were Sarmatians", LMAO, hence their turkic name and turkic language, right?
Greetings from Hungary to our all Turkic brothers 🤘🐺🇹🇷🇺🇿🇰🇿🇹🇲🇰🇬🇭🇺🇧🇬🐎🏹
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid
@@VerbalWarrior162 No, Iranians actually adopted Turkish culture and Indo-European is a theory.
Thank you Hungarian brothers.
Indo european is not a theory@@TarkanCAGRI
Tatkan belives in alp tunga. An createt fiktiv caracter with leopard fur on had wirtten 1500 years after scyhtian. He beloefs in an turkish batman hahahahahahha
We have no such thing as Proto-Turkic genes. This is a hypothetical word.Some consider Slab Grave to be proto-Turkic, but this is wrong. Slab Grave was a proto Mongolian and Proto-Tungusic culture. The Asian genes related to Gok Turks and Huns came mainly from the Baikal EBA cultures, whose genome was about 80% similar to the Slab Grave culture, and basically the Slab Grave itself migrated to this region from the east of Baikal. So this map is totally wrong.
I don’t understand why there is such confidence, maybe you think is wrong?
Early Xiongnu shows a clinality between the Chandman Saka, genetically Tasmola, that have some ancestry from Khovsgol_BA, genetically Baikal EBA, and Slab Grave. But by the late period of the Xiongnu, as in medieval Turks and Uighurs of Mongolia, the ancestry from Chandman disappears and the ancestry associated with the Sarmatians appears, genetically similar to the Alans of Asia and the Kangju. And at this time a wedge stands between the Sarmatians and Slab Grave. No strong connection with Baikal EBA is found during this period.
Article:
A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of Eurasia’s Eastern Steppe
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click%20on%20image%20to%20zoom&p=PMC3&id=7664836_figs4.jpg
Including the Kazakhs, having a large East Asian ancestry, do not show descent from AG3, unlike Khovsgol BA. Even the Sarmatians had more ancestry from AG3 not originating from Sintashta than the Kazakhs.
Article:
Ancient genomic time transect from the Central Asian Steppe unravels the history of the Scythians
www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg
Mongols show the highest ancestry from Slab Grave probably due to additional genetically identical influx from Manchuria.
The accounts in Vahaduo show that the Later Xiongnu as well as the medieval Turks of Mongolia and the Kazakh, Kirghiz and Mongols mainly stand in a wedge between Slab Grave and Kangju. Their ancestry from Khovsgol BA is scanty. And the Tungus Evenki show mainly ancestry from Nganasan.
Han_Henan KAZ_Kangju KAZ_Tasmola_IA MNG_Khovsgol_BA MNG_Slab_Grave_EIA_1 Nganassan
MNG_Early_Xiongnu 1.6 24.4 26.9 16.8 29.4 0.9
Late_Xiongnu 11.4 28.8 7.5 6.1 44.3 1.9
MNG_Early_Med_Turk 2.8 34.2 4.6 5.3 52.0 1.1
Evenk 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 32.7 66.9
Kazakh 12.5 41.4 1.0 3.5 40.5 1.2
Kirghiz:Bishkek 13.7 32.2 3.2 3.1 46.4 1.4
Mongolian:mongol 9.9 20.2 1.7 0.0 67.8 0.5
Yanılıyorsunuz. Donghu geleneği Moğol geleneğidir. Slab Grave Türk geleneğidir.
"The Huns spoke Hunnish, also called the Hunnic language. Its language family remains unclassified. However, the written evidence for the language is comparable to Turkic, Mongolic and Yeniseian languages. This is why Huns are believed to have been descendants from Kazakhstan, or of Turkic tribes from the Xiongnu "
Believe not certain
Hey dude nice work and i really like your videos can i give you an idea for a next video? Do a map of paleo balkanic adn(thracians ilyrians, paonians etc)
We can follow from sources that apart from Xiongnu, the people in the west, north and northwest also spoke Turkic at that time. Since this video was prepared entirely on the basis of the Slab Grave spread, I believe that it should be emphasized that the Deer Stones culture is at least Para-Turkic. Because Turkic expansion cannot be explained only by the Xiongnu. If the Deer Stones culture were the Yeniseian people, as Westerners most likely believe, there would be a very intense Yenisey influence in the Turkic language, and we do not see any Yeniseian influence in any of the Turkic languages. Thanks to studies, we know that the people of Deer Stones and Slab Grave never fought, that they had intense exchanges and relationships, that they lived among each other and were influenced by each other's cultures, and that they emulated each other. Two different cultures are a rare situation in world history. We also know that within the Seima-Turbino culture, the ancestors of the Uralians, the Khövsgöl and Ulaanzukh people, together formed a large and culturally significant steppe warrior-raiding community, which was deeply rooted even in Andronovo, extending from the Sintashta region to the northeast of today's China. In other words, the only obstacle to classifying peoples, such as the Proto-Scythian cultures and Saka, who mostly carry Deer Stones genetics but also have Indo-Iranian genetic heritage and who were born in Siberia, which Westerners classify as Indo-Iranian society, and the Saka, within the Turkic spread, is language. proof. However, for some reason, it seems very hypocritical to me to classify these societies as Indo-Iranian when there is no evidence of language. If you want to learn the language of the Deer Stones culture, I believe that you should look at the language of today's Saha-Sakhas. Because even today they are proud to say "We are the descendants of the Sakhas" and their rituals reveal this very clearly. They also speak Turkic language, but the number of words used in sentences and different synonyms is very high.
Can U pls make about sino Tibetan ancestry?🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
The Khazars Convert To Judaism ✡In 730, I Living In Tel Aviv, But My Ancestors Come From Crimea. I Am verry prouded with my Khazar ancestors. and not all Jewish are descended from Jacobs 12 Tribe, like my and the other Ashkenazi Groups. also Ashkenazi was one of the sons of Japheth!
And you should be proud how are christians and MUSLAM are proud about there religion
U are Oghur Turkic🫶🏻
You are Turkic 🇲🇳🇲🇳🇲🇳
The ancestry of the ancestors did not make the Crimea. The Khazar was tolerant. Their descendants founded Turkey. He installed it in Hungary. Kievi is their creation. Bulgaria they founded. And they are not Jews. Quintessentially Turks. Even those who made a state in the Germanic tribes. They ruled Iran for years. Even Palestine. Do what suits you now and stop the genocide.
you ain't even jew, you are turk then
I wonder if you modelled a composite Turko-Mongol genetic signature from the parallel migrations, likewise Germano-Slavic for Migration-Era Europe impact
Amazing,keep up the good work
Turks in Iranian Azerbaijan score 6-7% East Asian on average. Are the numbers in you video rounded up?
Then the Proto-Turks would be from Manchuria according to your intro text, the Xianyun and then Xiongnu would have other admixtures and not be 100%.
I love these videos please do more❤
very nice
The amount of information in this video is impressive. I can't imagine creating anything similar to this.
I don't know enough about any of this to how accurate it is, but I wonder: Didn't the Turks migrate to Anatolia in the 1200s? I thought the whole reason why they migrated to Anatolia in the first place was to flee from the Mongol invasions that occurred in that century?
Edit: I guess that's not really true.
first half migrated to anatolia after the 1071 manzikert war bc seljuks wanted to turkify anatolia. after the mongols conquerored Khwarezm turkmens didnt wanted a mongolian rule so the turkmen tribes migrated anatolia and after the mongols collapsed the second half established the ottomans
the most objective video on turkic geographical step ancestry...🙏🙏🙏🇹🇷🌏
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid
@@VerbalWarrior162ahahahaah you are a loser
You forgot the Otomans in Türkiye today and the Selchuks in Iran, Iraq and Syria. Westside is unfortunately „incomplete and wrong“ after 1000AD. :)
So you think Proto-Turkic people were 100% Mongoloid?
Self eawtasien scyhtians saka writting is 2023 proven iranic. They found an bilingual text. Turks are eastasiens
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzİskitler iranliydida niye sürekli perslerle ,farslarla yani iranilerle savaşıyordu peki
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzbulunan bı yazı o halkın ırkını gostermez
Azərbaycanlılar da türkdilli türk olmayan xalqdır.skitlər amma dəqiq fars kökənlidir.
I think we can't name them Proto-Turkic before they mixed with Siberian Aryans. No difference in genotype between those early 'Proto-Turkic' and Mongols. Probably correct naming should be paleo-Altay herders-gatherers.
Ironically turks from turkey has one of the lowest turkic ancestry 😂.
It's mostly symbolic. All peoples are genetically heterogeneous. "Turkic ancestry" or "Slavic ancestry" doesn't mean much because, most of the time, nationalities and nationality groupings are based on language.
Not ironical. Nomads migrated and intermarried with local people. Turks migrated anatolia with incredible number of populations that changed the region and course of the history. In 12th century, Anatolia is called Turchia(Turkey) by the Latins that support the idea of power of the migration. They intermarried and created Modern Turkish people. Modern Turks have significant amount of Turkic ancestry in their genes.
Turks from Türkiye Cumhuriyeti look almost the same as Greeks. Kyrghiz and Kazaks are the ones bear most resemblance to the proto-Turkic people. 🤔
@@hongdalai2753 no they dont. Kyrgyz and Kazakhs have Scythian and other Steppe admixture, and the Uyghurs have Tocharian admixture. There's no such thing as a "Proto-Turkic" look or Proto-anythig look. Everybody is mixed. Stop talking nonsense.
@@hongdalai2753 in Turkey we have so many different ethnic groups and foreigners, Turkish Tatars, Yörüks and some villagers from some regions have Nomadic -Turkic face, Kazakhs and Krygiz also have other nations blood, Mongolian and russian blood but most probably they are purer than us because we, Turks of Turkey, are grandsons of Turkic people and Anatolian natives. Of course we are not interested in adding other ethnical groups to this case, we talk about Turks that identify theirselves Turks, we do not talk about Kurdish people or Arabian people or Armenian nation or Circassian/Cherkes/Abhaz communities or Laz people, or minorites that belong to Slavic people or other race from Balkans (Albanians, Pomaks, Bosnian).
An important caveat: 'Turks' did not "borrow a nomadic lifestyle" from Indo-Europeans. One part of ancestors of proto-Turks(who were millet and rice farmers mainly in 5th millenium BCE) left Manchuria/Southeastern Siberia(probably due to steppification of the area by severe droughts as such phenomena constantly happen even today) and mixed with paleo-Siberian reindeer herders who were nomads already, and long before the Indo-European/Scythian admixture they mixed with those people and adopted herder-nomadism. Indo-European nomads(Scythians or a sister branch of proto-IE people) gave those pre-proto-Turks *equestrianism* , NOT necessarily *nomadism*.
In short: pre/proto-Turks were already nomads, reindeer and cattle herding nomads, but not horse nomads before intermixing with IE equestrians.
zero knowledge but a million ideas.
@@HatredForMankind
The Turks are not from Manchuria, and the early Turks were never pure Mongoloids and farmers
The ancestors of the Turks since at least the Bronze Age lived in Tarim, Ordos, western Altai and the eastern steppes of modern Kazakhstan
The Turks were originally cattle breeders and horse breeders
@@HatredForMankind
Indo-Europeans did not reach further than the Tien Shan and the Western Tarim
@@Scythian_nomad I am talking about the formation of proto-Turks. Horses came from the west, from Ponto-Caspian steppes and gradually introduced to the east.
Please make a video about the Iranic peoples. It would be very based.
Made it about him. There is an Indo-European video. You can look. 😊
I'm just making a video about Indo-Iranians from Sintashta
@@The_Geographer_Maps cool
Nice video, but there is a significant Turkic heritage among today's Tatars and ancient Bulgars
Where do you get your data about the Bulgars?
@@The_Geographer_Maps UA-cam won't let me write.
@@Sadoyasturadoglu Probably all due to the transfer of links. You can write the name of the study.
@@The_Geographer_Maps A Bulgar sample from the 9th or 10th century was shared in "the Turkish DNA project" Bulgaria Turks were ranked 1st on the affinity list and had an eastern Eurasian heritage at a level similar to that of modern Turks (other Balkan peoples have this east Asian heritage at the level of no or much lower).
@@Sadoyasturadoglu Alas, I could not find this sample.
The elite of the Avar Kaganate from the 8th to 9th centuries shows the emergence of a new genetic component associated with the North Caucasus, apparently from the Bulgars. Moreover, this component lacks East Asian origin.
Article:
Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs2.jpg
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867422002677-figs1.jpg
In addition, samples from the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of the 8th to 10th centuries in the Kharkov region, apparently belonging to the Khazars, show the identity to the North Caucasians.
media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0094-2/MediaObjects/41586_2018_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Also, my calculations on Vahaduo about Balkan populations show the absence of East Asian ancestry not from Turkish, but a good presence of ancestry from the North Caucasus.
Albanian Chechen Kazakh Slovakian Turkish_Antalya
Gagauz 66.5 9.8 0.2 19.5 4.1
Bulgarian 60.9 4.9 0.3 30.4 3.4
Macedonian 66.6 1.9 0.0 31.5 0.0
Serbian 49.9 2.2 0.2 47.5 0.3
Also, non-Fino-Ugric East Asian ancestry is absent among the populations of the Volga Bulgaria region which were not influenced by the Kipchaks.
Chechen Erzya Kazakh Mansi
Chuvash 6.5 57.6 1.3 34.6
Udmurt 10.7 48.2 0.0 41.1
Mari 1.7 49.2 0.0 49.2
Tatar_Kazan 13.0 59.8 13.8 13.4
It is likely that your sample may be associated with the Pechenegs
Excellent! I would suggest that majority of people living in Eastern Turkey be Turkish too. Contrary to the popular belief, Kurdish population there is in minority.
Evet abi ya. Ayıp ediyorlar valla
Utanmadan yalan söylemeyin.
He's blatantly lying.
The Black Sea section in the "Turkish" tab is incorrect. The only provinces that do not have Turkic contribution are Rize, Trabzon and Artvin. The remaining provinces have an East Asian input of around 8-15%, just like other provinces in Anatolia. In fact, Giresun province had outlier results from other provinces, has an East Asian heritage with an average of 16% and a range of 12-20%. And again, the elite paternal lineage of the Xiongnu, C-Y10420, originates from the provinces of Giresun, Samsun and Sivas. Those who want can review TDP's datasheet.
According to scientists and linguists
The turks split from Mongols 7000 years ago
The language began about 4500 years In modern day central mongolia
The first unmistakable evidence of Turkic history begins with the Huns/Xiongnu. There are theories about civilizations that preceded this, but there are not yet enough archaeological findings to provide convincing proof that these people were Turkic or that the confederations were governed by a Turkic ruling class, as in other confederations.
However, the Huns have now become unmistakable with all the evidence:
The names of Xiongnu and Western Hun leaders are almost indisputably Turkic. Additionally, there are other findings that strengthen this connection.
Khan Dikkiz (Dengizich - Deniz) Dish/Plate
A dish with runes was translated with the following text:
Kinkeg Dikkiz ükü kässä
Kiji sax sax saxynil gür Tänrig
Translation:
"Fear the blow of King Dikkiz the Wise! Retreat to the God beyond this world!"
Sura Rune Inscription
Another inscription, attributed to the Xiongnu/Huns, reads as follows:
(i)g känč : ap(a) kurčik : sal aranģï : eenč uğ(a)
Translation:
"Ah young Apa Kurčik, let yourself rest in peaceful sleep in the coffin/burial / rest in peaceful sleep in the coffin/burial!"
Chinese Historical Mention
A Chinese historian noted the following words he heard in the Xiongnu language. In 329 CE, a Xiongnu leader asked Fo-t’u-teng for help regarding an upcoming battle against Liu Yao. After a ritual, he spoke a prophecy in the Ho language:
siu-k’i t’i-li-kang puh-koh kü-t’u-tang
Interpretation:
"The army will march and capture Liu Yao."
Meaning of the terms:
siu-k’i: "army"
t’i-li-kang: "march"
puh-koh: "Liu Yao" (his title)
kü-t’u-tang: "capture"
Transcriptions by Sinologists
Bernhard Karlgren: siog tieg t’iei lied kang b’uok kuk g’iu t’uk-tang
Edwin G. Pulleyblank: sux-keh the-let-kang buk-kok goh-thok-tang
Turkic Reconstructions
G.J. Ramstedt: Süke talıkıng (talıkang) bügüg (ügeg) tutang - "Go to war, capture the enemy leader!"
Talat Tekin: Sü:ke tılıkang bugukgı tuktang - "Go to war, capture Buguk (the leader)."
Significance
This expression represents one of the earliest known examples of a Turkic language and provides valuable insight into the linguistic and cultural interactions between the Xiongnu and Chinese civilizations.
Xiongnu and Turkic Connections
Similarities in Runes
The runes of the Xiongnu are nearly identical to the Göktürk runic script.
Mentions in Chinese Sources
Book of Jin: Mentions 19 Southern Xiongnu tribes who entered Former Yan, the 14th of which was the Alat (Ch. 賀賴 Helai ~ 賀蘭 Helan ~ 曷剌 Hela). Alat translates to "pinto horse" (Ch. 駁馬 ~ 駮馬 Boma) in Old Turkic.
Book of Zhou, History of the Northern Dynasties, Tongdian, New Book of Tang: Mention that the Göktürks and the ruling Ashina clan were part of the Xiongnu confederation.
Uyghur Khagans: Claimed descent from the Xiongnu.
Book of Wei: States that the Yueban descended from the Northern Xiongnu and that their language and customs were similar to those of the Tiele.
Names and Meanings
Alat (Turkic: Ala or Alagchin): Means "pinto horse." This tribal name appears in both Chinese annals and later Turkic tribes.
The Xiongnu referred to heaven (天): Chēnglí (擇犁), a Chinese transcription of Tengri.
Ruling Clans
Luandi/Xulianti Clan: This was the ruling clan of the Xiongnu from the 3rd century BCE to the 4th century CE. The word Luandi comes from the Chinese Book of Han, while Xulianti is from the Book of Later Han.
Chinese researchers reconstruct Old Chinese Luandi as Hala-yundluğ, meaning "tribe with pinto horses" in an early Turkic dialect.
Further Details
Lanhai Wei and Hui Li: Reconstruct the Old Chinese pronunciation of 挛鞮 as lyuan-tlïɣ, originating from an earlier form 虚连题 (Hala-yundluɣ). This resulted from a historical sound shift where h- disappeared. The roots hala (colorful), yund (horse), and the participle suffix -luɣ combined to mean "tribe with pinto horses" in an early Turkic dialect. This can be identified with the historical Ulayundluğ tribe (ALAT TRIBE).
The conquest of the same clan by the Xue in the 4th century CE led to the Xueyantuo. The Xueyantuo were an ancient Tiele tribe and khanate in Northeast Asia. They were once vassals of the Göktürks but later allied with the Tang dynasty against the Eastern Göktürks.
Alat Tribe
The Alat tribe (also known as Ala-at, Ala, Alachin, Alagchin, Alchin, Alchi, Alayontli, Ulayundluğ, meaning "pinto horse" or "spotted horse"). Chinese names include Boma 駁馬 or 駮馬, Helai 賀賴, Helan 賀蘭, Hela 曷剌, and Bila 弊剌.
In the old Turkic lexicon, the meaning of "pinto horse" is expressed with terms such as ala or alagchin, which are still used in compound expressions today. The Tang Huiyao mentions a tribe named Geluozhiya (葛羅枝牙) directly after the Ashina tribe, with a tamga that was later also found among the Oghuz tribe.
Since the Oghuz (Turkmen) tribe of Alayontli has the same tamga as the Boma (Alat) tribe, and the name also translates to "pinto horse," Zuev is convinced that Alayontli is the same tribe as Alat.
Conclusion
The evidence that the Xiongnu leaders were of Turkic origin is overwhelming. Their language, runes, religious terms, and the connections with later Turkic tribes such as the Göktürks and Oghuz support this conclusion. According to Chinese historians, there is no doubt about the origin of the Xiongnu; only Western historians have proposed alternative theories, which are becoming increasingly untenable.
In several Chinese sources, it is also mentioned that "Chanyu," the title for the Xiongnu leaders, was also given to later Tujue (Turkic) leaders. "Chanyu" is sometimes transcribed as "Tarkan." The full title is Chengli Gutu Chanyu = Tengri Çocuğu Tarkan. This means "Son of god/heaven _[INSERT NAME]_ (Tar)khan. A new Turkic stone was found of the gökturk empire by the way and it word for word contains the title "son of god/heaven".
The Xiongnu empire had a military structure that showed many similarities with later Turkic and Mongolian armies. Their army was organized in a hierarchical system with different divisions:
Tuqi Kings (Wise Kings) of Left and Right: Directly under the Leader, these kings governed the left (eastern) and right (western) wings of the empire. The Tuqi King of the Left Wing was usually the heir apparent. The word Tuqi is a direct translation of the Turkic (j)ükü, meaning "wise," which literally reflects the Chinese concept of "wise prince."
Guli (Ku-li) and Military Commanders: Officials who oversaw military operations, with counterparts on both the left and right sides. The term Guli (Ku-li) is related to the Turkic word Kolu, meaning "arms" or "wings" of the army, referring to a military division or branch of the forces.
Around 1040, nomadic Oghuz Turks were in Iran, Iraq and Syria. From here they came to Anatolia and over time they spread over a wide area to the Balkans. Today this can be proven not only with DNA but also with cultural remains. Since Turks spread over a very wide area, it is not possible for them to remain with a uniform DNA.
Proto-turkic culture is originally from idil(volga) and this ancestry meter is definitely not true. Our turkic ancestors from idel were not asians like mongolians its clear
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Turkic where asians mongoliand its clear ...
= anatol not turkic .. anatol is hilinic and Arman and arabic and kard
İdilden gelmiyor knk. Kuzeydoğu Asya'danız
Proto-turkic culture？？🤣🤣Proto-turkic originated from ANA, they assimilated 【steppe herders(volga)+ Iranian farmers】
@@tanhukim9963 neye göre söylüyosun bunu, bu tez batılıların yanlı tezlerinden biri sadece, doğruluğu yok. Asyalı görünüşe sahip olmayanlar Türk değildir fikriyle yanlı olarak oluşturulmuş bi yalan bu, plana dahil olarak türkiye türkleri aslında müslümaan yunan falan diye saçmalamaları da bundan kaynaklı. Gittiğimizde her yerde yerlilerle bi oranda karıştık bu doğru,ama çoğunlukla Türk genetik mirasını taşıyoruz. Batıya göçen oğuzlar burdaki yerlilerle,kazaklar da moğollar karıştı, bu kadar farklı gözükmemizin sebebi budur.
No that's not true. All Medieval Turkics are Eurasian. Including Kipchaks who lived in Kazakhstan and Russia. Let's model modern Turks with Kipchaks to see how Turkic they are.
Target: Turkish(West)
Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047
31.2 KAZ_Kipchak
30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Bolu)
Distance: 0.7747% / 0.00774707
35.8 KAZ_Kipchak
24.4 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
14.2 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
5.4 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
2.4 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
1.4 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 0.7316% / 0.00731601
42.6 KAZ_Kipchak
27.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
13.6 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
6.8 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
6.6 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
3.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
These are all Vahaduo calculations. Hope it helps you the understand. Schyto Sarmatian ancestry in Medieval Turkics is not Persian at all. Persians are Elamites with minimal real Indo European ancestry.
Also Turks have upto %22 East Asian ancestry. And medieval Turkics are all Eurasian.
Let's compare Uzbek and Anatolian Turk and Anatolian Greek in neolithic calculation.
Target: Greek_Cappadocia
Distance: 3.3814% / 0.03381362
50.4 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer)
18.6 GEO_CHG(Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer)
16.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer)
8.0 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer)
6.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European)
Target: Uzbek
Distance: 3.2676% / 0.03267641
38.0 RUS_Devils-Gate-Cave_N(North_East_Asian)
30.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European)
17.8 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer)
12.0 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer)
1.4 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer)
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 1.8099% / 0.01809908
34.2 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N(Anatolian_Farmer)
22.8 RUS_Samara_Yamnaya(Proto_Indo_European)
17.2 RUS_Devils-Gate-Cave_N(North_East_Asian)
14.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N(Zagrosian_Farmer)
6.6 GEO_CHG(Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer)
5.0 Levant_Natufian_EpiP(Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer)
And let's model Turk between Uzbek and Anatolian Greek.
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 2.2850% / 0.02284951
53.8 Greek_Cappadocia
46.2 Uzbek
Hope it helps you to understand.
Doğru kardeşim doğru bizler mançurya bölgesinden geliyoruz bunu kabul et.
Tamam ama Anadoluya gelen orta Çağ Türkleri gayet Avrasyalı.
Target: Turkish(West)
Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047
31.2 KAZ_Kipchak
30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Bolu)
Distance: 0.7747% / 0.00774707
35.8 KAZ_Kipchak
24.4 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
16.4 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
14.2 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
5.4 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
2.4 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
1.4 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
Target: Turkish(Muğla)
Distance: 0.7316% / 0.00731601
42.6 KAZ_Kipchak
27.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC
13.6 IRN_Hasanlu_IA
6.8 Mycenaean_Greek_1350BC
6.6 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine
3.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC
@@tanhukim9963
@@xdd87evet knk illaki diğer ırkların da vardır. Bizim anadoluda %15-20 civarı doğu asya dnası zaten. Hint Avrupa oranı ona bakılırsa daha az. %5 civarı. Ben IE dnası daha çok çıkar sanıyordum. Ancak çıkmamış. Yunan dnasıno IE dnaso sanıyordum ANF ( Anadolu neolithic farmer) dnası ıktı. Haritalarda yunanistanı gösterince Yunan dnası sanıyor bizim millet. Alakası yokmuş. IE dnası kıyı kenarlarında %10 olabilir. Çünkü Yunanlılar ve diğer IEler kıyı kenarlarına yerleşti çoğunluk. Hem biz Orta Asya'dan da taşımış olabiliriz IE dnasını. Çünkü genelde Hint Avrupalılar anadoluyu ve mezopotamyayı asimile etti. Örneğin Kürtlerde ve ermenilerde Türkiyede yaşayanlarında hiç yok. Ama söze gelince biz devşirmeyiz😂. Ermenistan'da ki ermenilerde de hiç yok. Kürtlerde olsa olsa %1-5 arası güneydoğu Anadolu'nun güney illerinde yaşayanların da vardır. Kuzeyinde yok. Hatta o bile yoktur. Kızılbaş olan Zaza Kürtlerde çoğunluk Türk dnası var. Bir de zaten savaştan sonra çoğu Ermeni (en az 5 milyon gizli Ermeni) Kürt kılığına girdi.
@@tanhukim9963 Yoo
@@Sadoyasturadoglu ne yoo
Siberian Tatar, They migrated to Siberia after the disintegration of the Mongol Golden Horde, and they are not ancient Mongol-speaking Tatars. They are descendants of the Volga Bulgarians. They were called Tatars because of the Mongol ruling elite, “Tatars,” and they are not true Tatars.
CORRECT 💯
False, they are descendants of local cumans and native people of western Siberia. They haven't genetic connections with volga tatars who are mostly descendants of Volga finnic people.
Wonderful job, your video about the Uralic peoples was great and I hope you do another video about the Saka (Iranian) and Tocharian Indo European steppe peoples to really complete the “steppe trilogy”.
That being said the language of the Xiongnu, Huns and Hepthalites is quite contested. With the Hephtalites probably being the most likely speakers of Turkic languages (before their adoption of Sogdian and Bactrian). Again though, many dispute this and say they were Iranians. The answer is probably in the middle.
The language of the Xiongnu however, especially that of the elites is believed to be belonging to the Yeniseian family, essentially Siberian in origin. Although it is quite probable the lay tribesman was speaking a form of Proto-Turkic and/or had Proto-Turkic ancestry.
Finally the Huns are again, not certain, as there is no written source from the Huns themselves, only Latinized and Hellenized names. Many believe they were speaking a form of Oghur Turkic, Mongolic or Yeniseian. With the tribes they subjugated mainly speaking Iranian or Tocharian languages.
My main correction is linguistic, I’m sure all of these groups had Proto-Turkic ancestry but there is still a lot that is uncertain. Still a great video and keep making more
I'm currently making a map about the Indo-Iranians. I made the Turkic map to complete the Indo-Iranian map, since the Turks have some proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry.
The Kazakhs stand in a wedge between the Sarmatians and the East Asian source that shows no ancestry from AG3 or ANE. This shows that this East Asian source did not originate from South Siberian cultures such as Khovsgol, but originate from the steppe culture of Ulaanzuukh, the ancestor of the Slab-Grave culture that were the ancestor of the Xiongnu.
www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867420313210-gr3.jpg
Linguistics shows that the first division of the Common Turkic language was into Siberian and Central Asian, and chronologicaly was apparently connected with the displacement of the Xiongnu from Mongolia. The Central Asian branch of the Turkic language was divided on average in 250 CE, namely into agricultural ones, associated with the Oguzes, apparently descending from the Chionites, and into nomadic ones, associated with the Kipchaks, descending from the Yueban.
www.turkceogretimi.com/images/2019/turkdilleri3glottochronology.jpg
www.researchgate.net/profile/Tanmoy-Bhattacharya-2/publication/270000362/figure/fig2/AS:613900487774210@1523376690336/Phylogenetic-Trees-of-the-Turkic-Language-Family-Consensus-topologies-for-the-model.png
qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f483b8667866ac970d49af4bebfcc24c-lq
In addition, on the Kidarite seal from Samarkand there is the inscription “Oglar Hun” of Turkic origin.
The names of some organs
it's used as the suffix for nouns, “Ak”= ~each of both
(Yan= side)
Yan-ak= each of both sides (of the face) >Yanak= cheek
(Gül= rose)
Kül-ak = each of both the roses >Kulak= Ear
(Şek=facet)
Şek-ak = each of both sides (of forehead) >Şakak= temple
(Dal=subsection, branch)
Dal-ak=dalak= Spleen
(Böbür=scarlet fleck)
Böbür-ak=böbrek= Kidney = each of both red-spots / blodfleck
Bağça-ak>(Paça-ak)>bacak= Leg (ankle)
(Pati = paw)
Batı-ak>pathiak>phatyak>hadyak>adyak)=Ayak= the foot > each of the feet
(Taş=stone)
Taş-ak=testicle
Akciğer=(each of) both lungs
Tül-karn-ak =that obscures/ shadowing each of both dark/ covert periods= Karanlık (batıni) çağların her birini örten tül
Zhu'l-karn-eyn=the (shader) owner of each of both times
Dhu'al-chorn-ein=double-horned-one=(the horned hunter)Herne the hunter> Cernunnos> Karneios
it's used as the suffix for verbs, “Ak /ek“=a-qa ~which thing to / what’s to…
Er-mek = to get / to reach
Bar-mak (Varmak)= to arrive / to achieve
Er-en-mek > erinmek / Bar-an-mak > barınmak =arrive at one's own
Erin-ek / barın-ak = what’s there to arrive at oneself
Ernek / Barnak > Parmak = Finger
Çiğ=uncooked, raw
Çiğne-mek =to chew
Çiğne-ek>Çiğneh> Çene = Chin
Tut-mak = to hold / to keep
Tut-ak=Dudak= Lip
Tara-mak = to comb/ ~to rake
Tara-ak > Tarak =(what’s there to comb)> the comb
Tara-en-mak > taranmak = to comb oneself
Taran-ak > Tırnak =(what’s there to comb oneself)> fingernail
NATURAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
(akar-eser / eser-eger)
EĞER-ISE = (EVEN-IF)
(su AKAR- yel ESER) = water flows - wind blows
İSE-EĞER = (IF-EVER)
(yel ESER- ekin EĞER)= the wind blows and bows the crops
EĞER-ISE and İSE-EĞER constructs are used to specify "conditions" and are often used interchangeably.
İSE-EĞER: means "If ever" and indicates a condition that is more likely to occur.
"If ever you need any help, just let me know." (Yardıma ihtiyacın olursa eğer, sadece haberim olsun) or (Herhangi bir yardıma ihtiyaç duyarsan, bana haber vermen yeterli)
“If I'm not tired, we can visit them in the evening.” = “Yorgun değilsem eğer, akşamleyin onları ziyaret edebiliriz”
EĞER-ISE: means "Even if" and indicates a condition that is less likely to occur.
"Even if it rains tomorrow, I will go for a walk." (Yarın yürüyüşe çıkacağım, eğer yağmur yağıyor olsa da ) or (Yarın yağmur yağsa bile yürüyüşe çıkacağım.)
“Why should i go to work, (even) if I'm not getting my salary” = Eğer maaşımı alamıyorsam, neden işe gideyim ki.
Yeğ / Yüğ = upper, superior
Yeğ-mek > Yemek (to eat)= to add on oneself, to take it in one's essence
Yeğ-im> Yem= provender, fodder > Yemiş= fruit
Yüğ-le-mek > yeğlemek = to keep it on top of others, make it relatively superior, ~to prefer
Yüğ-ka-yer-u > yukarı =(which side is on top) = Up
Yüğ-ce > yüce = superior in level /sublime
Yüğ-ce-al-mek > yücelmek = to achieve superiority in level
Yüğ-sü-ek > yüksek = high
Yüğ-sel > yüksel = exponential , superlative
Yüğ-sü-al-mek> yükselmek = to rise to a high level, to ascend
Yüğ-sük > yüzük =(ring)= jewelry worn on the finger top
Yüğ-sü-en-mek > yüksünmek= to feel slighted / take offended
Yüğ-ük > yük =(load)> carried on top, undertaken
Yüğ-ün > yün =(wool)> the feathers that on sheep
Yüğ-üt > yiğit =(valiant)> superior in character
Yüğ-en > yüğen /yeğen =(nephew)> which is kept superior, held in high esteem, valued, precious (yüen > yen 元)
Yüğ-en-cük > yüğençüğ > yinçi (inci) =(precious little thing)> pearl , 珍珠
Yüğengi >yengi> yeni =(new)> what's that coming on top , what's coming after
Yüğenge > yenge =(brother's wife)> who's coming after, added to the family later (new bride)
Yüğ-üne /Yeğ-ine > yine/ gene =again /over and over > yeniden = anew /once more
Yüğ-en-mek> yenmek = to overcome, to cope with, to subdue
Yüğ-en-el-mek > yenilmek= to be overcome, to be subdued, to show weakness
Yüğengil > yengil =remains on top of, light, weak
Şan= Glory, splendor 單于 > Şan-Yüğ =Exalted glorious
Yormak=to tire= to arrive over someone (too many). (too much) to go onto
(Yörmek)> Örmek=(to operate on something), to weave on top , to wrap around
(Yörümek)> Yürümek= to go over something, to wander around
(yöre=precincts) (yörük=nomad)
Yürümek= to walk (yürü=go on)
Yülümek=to go by slipping over something
Yalamak= to lick >~to take swiping/ by scraping on something off
Yolmak= to pluck=to pull by snatching off, tear off (~flatten the top)
Yılmak=to throw down from the one's own top (~get bored), to hit the ground from above (yıldırım=lightning…yıldız=star)
Yurmak= to pull onto, cover over (yur-ut>yurt=tabernacle) (yur-gan>yorgan=quilt)
Yırmak=to bring it on top of, to take it off (yırışmak>yarışmak= to race> to overcome each other)
(Yır-et-mak)>Yırtmak= to tear= to get it inside-out or bottom to top (by pulling from both sides) (~tide over, get rid of it)
Yarmak= to split, to tear apart= go vertically from top to bottom, separate by cutting off
Yermek=to pull down ,pull to the ground
Germek=to tense= to pull it in all directions > Sermek= to spread it in all directions
Yıkmak= to demolish= overthrow , take down from top to bottom, turn upside down
Yığmak= to stack= put on top of each other, dump on top of each other (yığlamak=shed tears over and over, cry over)
Yağmak=get rained on, get spilled on / to pour down from above
Yakmak= to burn out=to purify matter by heating and removing mass , reduce its volume
Yoğmak=make condensed=to tighten and purify, narrow by turning, get rid of own volume (~get dead)
Yoğurmak= to knead=tighten and thicken , reduce volume, bring to consistency
(Yogurt=thickened milk product)
Yuğmak=to purify squeezing to clean (Yuğamak>yıkamak= to wash)
Yiv = sharp, pointed (yivlemek= sharpen the tip)
Yuvmak=to squeezing thin out, narrow (yuvka>yufka= thin dough) (yuvka>yuka=thin, shallow) (yuvuz>yavuz=thin, weak, delicate)
Yuvarlamak=to round off=narrow by turning (yuva (smallest shelter)= nest) (yavru (smallest)= cub )
Yummak=to shut by squeezing, close tightly (Yumurmak=make it closes inward) (yumruk=fist) (yumurta= egg)
Do History of Japonic People
this is the video
Bulgars had much higher turkic admixture DA 142
Where is your evidence?
@@The_Geographer_Maps Also Bashkir history is something weird here? They are considered as people living near Urals, not Caspian Sea. Nevertheless, you did great work with this video
So, Tuvans are the Turkest Turkics?
Bəli. Tuva respublikası türk respublikasıdır.
But saar 🇹🇷👳🏾♂️🪳 I’m real Turk saar
0:23 I love the history of the Mongols❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤. And obviously I love their cultures, their lifestyle and their society
Thats turkic
You have added some non-turkic speaker having proto-turkic ancestry. Then, why didn't you add eastern sycthians whose their dna mongoloid dominant and generally coming from proto-turks (Amur River HG)? In your Proto-İndo European Video , you even showed how %100 east eurasian people from mongolia migrated to West Eurasia and the change in DNA Western Sycthians and Cimmerians due to this migration.
-The Tribe of Yemek may be "Kimek", I guess
The East Asian source that influenced the Scythians shows admixture from Botai and apparently comes from Khovsgol and Baikal EBA, unlike for example the Kazakhs whose East Asian source shows no Botai admixture, and probably comes from Ulaanzuukh and the derived Slab Grave.
www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.abe4414/asset/bf62e04f-1203-4854-9f09-c2c31275aada/assets/graphic/abe4414-f2.jpeg
ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0092867420313210-gr3.jpg
Yemek is an alternative name for Kimek. In different historical sources this people are called differently
I think it would be nicer if the colour palet was adjusted less frequently so the purity levels going down could be more easily seen.
"The Xiongnu Empire encompassed virtually every ethnic and linguistic group in Inner Asia. These included the Mongolic-speaking Donghu people to the east and the Indo-European-speaking Yuezhi people to the west. There was also a large population of Turkic and Iranian language speakers within the Xiongnu Empire "
How on earth do the Mongolic peoples have Proto Turkic ancestry? Doesn’t make sense.
Mongol and Mongoloid are modern terms. The ancient Mongols of Genghis Khan are the Turks. But we do not deny that modern Mongols have the dna of the Turks, since we are nomads and lived together.
@@keteket Mongols are not Turks. They may have lived in close proximity to Turkic tribes, but are themselves not Turks. They are a separate people with a different language and culture.
Çünkü Proto-Türk mirasına sahip Türklerle karıştılar.
@@SerkanKabak25türk boylariyla Moğol boyları çokça karışmış o sebepten bu sonuca varmış olabilirler ama kültür aynı dilleri farklı mogolların köken olarak aynı dil olabilir çinceden çok etkilenmiş deişmiştir belki
So Turkey for example didnt change for the past 700 years? Cap.
Are the Turks the same survivors of Mongol Genghis in the lands captured by the Mongols? And if the answer is negative, then what kind of race are the Turks and what do they do in the lands that originally had white and Semitic people throughout history?
Feth ettik
They are the descendants of Seljuks which conquered the region in 1071. So Turks were in Turkey before the Mongol invasions. They originate from modern day Mongolia, southern Siberia and Northern Manchuria. They do have their similarities with Mongolic people as they lived in a similar geography and are both Altaic people but they are not the same.
The Hungarians, Bulgarians, And Kyrgyzs migrating from central Russia to else wear, refusing to elaborate: 🗿🗿🗿
Nomad moment
I have Turkic DNA in me from way back of course. DNA match with Yakuts, Altaians, Mongolian, and a Kazakhstan nomadic woman from the 400's BC. This may all come from Native American DNA .
Native americans and Turkic people share DNA indeed, they were originally Turkic people who crossed Siberia into America. Look at the Na-Dene languages that share many Turkic words and Havasupai people for example Hava = Air/Sky Su = Water and Pai = Boy = Clan, it has the same meaning in Turkic to this day as it does to the Havasupai people. Then look at symbols and carpet weaving, it's the exact same weaving and look at videos of the Sakha/Yakut people. Kayak = Kayik (turkic word, which literally would mean to slide, drift or in this case float) Tepee = Tepe = Top in turkic we call the holes in our yurts "Tepegöz" which means eye at the top, similarly tepees have eyes at the top. We would call a mountain a Tepe too. And then there's hundreds of words like I meantioned that are the same in many Native American languages. We also have symbols that are the same, we have for example wolf's mouth symbol in carpet weaving or "Handsonhips = Elinbelinde" symbol, we see this symbol with Native Americans as well. There's dozens of similar symbols like that. Clothing is another thing that is similar. It's quite undeniable that these people are connected.
It shows that Mongolic and Turkic are the same. But these are completely different groups.
Those Hepthalites and Kidarites need the grey shading - we have samples of their language now, and it is East Iranic
They are of Turkic origin. over time they assimilated there
Turkic origin
Is it possible that some of these people migrated to italy or spain a few centuries ago? I believe to have (confirmed by DNA) some of this heritage, coming from Spain or Italy. I'm thinking probably Spain mostly.
No, maybe some arabic if you are from spain or southern italy
@@usputar4873 they had, but we did as they did to us before (Reconquista)
Probably, hidden hands are deliberately misrepresenting history to us. Inside the plateau of Iran, there are tens of thousands of villages with Turkish names in all parts of the country, which are more than three thousand years old. There are ancient works with Turkish lines of Orkhon, which are more than three thousand years old. How is it possible that all these works, which are more than three thousand years old, are deliberately ignored in the scientific circles of the West? Azerbaijan, where all its people are Turks and more than three times these people live inside Iran, considers everyone as Turks. The ugly hands of lies have gone so far that all Turkish governments of Iran such as the Safavids, the Seljuks, the Timurids, the Ghaznavids, the Aqqoyunlu, the Qaraquyunlu, the Qajar, the Afsharian, and so on, introduce them as Persia. And what is more interesting is that in this distortion of history, all western circles seem to be united. I must add that most archaeologists in Iran consider what the Westerners introduce as the Achaemenid Empire, as well as Cyrus the Great and Darius the Great, and even the ancient works of Persepolis and Pasargad, a shameless falsification of the history of the region.
Why you showing Chigil as distinct tribe from Uyghurs, you showing Chigils are kazakhs tribe...
When Chigils are one of dominant Tribe of Uyghurs in Southern Xinjiang, they have very Caucasoid features.
kazakh don't look like Karluks, they look Mongol
Kazakhs are essentially Turks. C DNA is specific to Northeast Asians. Slab grave culture is a Turkish tradition.
@@tanhukim9963 Chigil aren't kazakh part never .
Chigil are one of Tribe of Karluks, they live in Kashgar and Fergana valley, they aren't connected to Mongol kazakhs with C2 haplo Tungus
I do not show Chigil as Kazakhs. Just a group of nomadic Uzbeks named Kazakh migrated to the area where Chigil supposedly lived at this time. In addition, the Chigil lived between Issyk-Kul and the Ili River. Chigil is often shown as a separate people from the Karluks, but I have not heard about the connection with the Uyghurs at all. If we look at the genomes of the Karakhanids and Karluks of Kazakhstan, they show the greatest closeness to the Karakalpaks and Nogais, that is, they are closer to the Kazakhs than to the Uighurs and are Mongoloids.
@@The_Geographer_Maps If you look clear to Karluk and true Karakhanid they are much more closer to Uyghurs and Hazara which are Dominantly carry They genotype.
karakalpak can't be Karakhanid, they live very far from it.
Karakhanid khanate begins from Kashgar and then they occupied Central Asia, maybe then mixed with them
@@The_Geographer_Maps You look better genotype, and tribe of Kashgar.
Nearly half population of Xinjiang belongs to Karluk DNA and Chigil is a part of it.
Maybe Kashgarians belong to Chigil tribe.
you better learn history
This Video of information is incorrect. Not only Slab Grave culture was forgotten, but Turkics people have existed in other cultures as well. This is confirmed by Ancient sources and archaeological research
Turkmens should be on the 40% atleast, I saw alot of them getting above 50% central Asian, plus they gotta that Q-M242 haplogroup which is east asian
@@decollector95 Not at all, Just search Turkmen DNA tests and you'll find that their central asian with allota of East Asian components is high af. Plus the Kyrgyz have Iranic haplogroup (R1a), while Turkmen haplogroup is way more East Euroasian (Q-M242).
I've already seen Turkmens who are 60% East Asian even
@@decollector95 Again you kinda ignoring that their haplogroup is mainly Q-M242, those of Turkmenistan are a bit more mixed but if you look at the rest like the Turkmens of Afghanistan, Karakalpakstan and even in Merv((Khorasan)) you'll see they are way East Asian + "Genetics. Haplogroup Q-M242 is commonly found in Siberia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia. This haplogroup forms a large percentage of the paternal lineages of Turkmens"
@@decollector95 R1a is actually of Central Asian origin + specifically Indo - Iranic origin also known as R-M420 with his sub haplogroups like R1a-Z282 and R1a-Z93
@@decollector95 Q-M242 is actually Southern Siberian in origin, more associated with the Baikal area especially with Baikal hunter gatherers culture which Altaians and Turkmens both are descendants from, you can even ggl it btw.
@@karzarkayin Indeed and IK many Turkmens who even still have significant Gobid elements
One thing not correct is that the boundary in China(today's China)is not that north, it should reach the middle of China. Obviously that the north China 's land is also very suitable for nomadic life. Super vast plain.
The nomadic people are living in the north China for at least 2000 years, nowadays the north Chinese are still very different from the south chinese in appearance. And today 's Turkish are not that Turkic actually, they are mix of Arabian and European. They have the turkic culture much more than the blood relationship.
Mongol, Oirat,Xianbei and Tuoba Mongolic People non-Turkic People
Why do you claim that they are Turkic people
That's what DNA says.
@@keteket
The language of these peoples is not Turkish.
They were enemies of the Turks.
@@Tokyo2905 Bro dna. Okey!
I don't know, why everyone is bullying turkish people?? 😭
Probably a bunch of persians
They always Say they descend from oghuz turks, but the fact is that modern turks are just a mix between ancient Anatolian greeks, persians, and indigenous populations from that region who converted to islam and learn the language of a the ruling elite (oghuz turks).
@@uzer-1071 Не все приняли язык элиты, не все хотят ассимилироваться.
As a Chuvash, I do this just for fun. Turkish peoples in the Turkic world are the same as Russians in the Slavic world. Both have big egos, imperialistic minds and a manner when they dare to teach their historical brothers how they should live and teach them their history. The Turkish peoples will like you until you start respecting yourself. There is nothing wrong with ЬuІІуіng Turkish people
No it is fight.
Turkic peoples vs persian, greek and racist people. Turks are collectively becoming racist and feel lonely because of these b@stards.
Bad music + There are lots of mistakes with all of the Karluk Turks and Turkmens in Turkmenistan + You showed like there were no Anatolian Turks in Eastern Anatolia until 1750s this is obviously an error. And i dont think Kazakhs had proto-turkic ancestry more than all of other turkic people like you showed. They are mixed too. The Bashkirs have more proto-turkic ancestry than the Kazakhs.
+ Yakuts have like 1% proto-turkic ancestry but in the video they were shown like they had like 30-40%
They come from Mongolia
Yes.
What is the latest music? Nothing found by the title from the description
What minute are you asking?
@@singrayzada4:00. I tried searching by the title from the description (Damo - Music Turkish No Copyright 2020), but I didn't find anything related to this music.
@@xacker585music name (dou you mind - sepide fakhr)
The spread of Turkish in Anatolia seems to be a bit wrong. Western Anatolia, and North east Turkey and Eastern Thrace already had a Turkish majority/plurality before the 19th century.
02:37 I wonder why you put these musics that has nothing to do with Turkic culture
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Indo-Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid.
Yes transeurasic family languages proven 2022
@VerbalWarrior162 I see this absurd and delusional argument of yours under every comment without valid and logical reasons from the pages you read in them. Of course, by seeing such ridiculous videos, it is clear that you are happier than the intensity of the illusion 😂
@@Alper.didi3000of course, you belive that Turkish are the real turks 🤨
This video is just ridiculous in so many levels but saying that bulgars and khazars have 0% turkic dna is just insane how tf they spoke turkic languages then and their culture was turkic as well?
The Greeks and the Celts spoke Latin and ended up practicing Roman culture through assimilation, but they aren't Latin are they? You get what I'm suggesting?
@@LadyKieraHaze it's only valid if you're trying to say that turkic speaking people can have no turkic dna in them which can be true but this whole turkic dna stuff is complete bs tbh there's no such a thing since turkic people were a mix of different tribes and ethnicities since the very beginning
3:06 the way hazars created
do Germanic next
Make about Mongolic peoples
This is a video
When will the Iranian video drop?
It's almost ready. Maybe in a week
@@The_Geographer_Maps🙏 can you post updates on your community hub
Do semitic speakers and proto semitic ancestry
What is Xianyun?
Xianyun is nomadic people which inhabited in modern-day mongolia and raided the bronze age china, the information about them is small because the zhou dynasty descripted them and of for 3000 years the some sources were disappeared by the time we know only they were nomad and raided zhou dynasty
So, were they considered Turkic?
@antoinelavoisier2772 genetically they are ancestors of xiongnu and so they could speak in pre proto turkic language
@@decollector95so the Huns who gave birth to the Turks were sino tibetan then?
You confused with xirong
Also the 0% turkic in volga bulgars is a joke
Volga bulgars were turkified, original and danube bulgars were not.
Yenisei Kyrgyz Khaganate was so big !!! This video is wrong
Тут показано расселение народов, а не границы государств. Под крылом Кыргызского каганата были не только кыргызы
Kyrgyzstan destroyed the country established by the Uyghur people, but has never been able to control this region. The restoration of order in this region relies on the Khitan people。After the Khitan emperor's expedition, Kyrgyzstan belonged to the Khitan. During this period, Kyrgyz people have been living very well. Because during the Mongol rule, there were always wars in the Kyrgyz region. Kyrgyz people began to migrate to their current residential areas
If Turks were moved from Manchuria to Mongolia, then Turks should have lots of similar words (that was created during agricultural revolution) to Mongolic languages but Turkic languages are heavily similar to Hungarian instead of Central Asian people's languages. The fact is we see the words similar between Mongol and Turkic languages after Iron Age. Oldest words we know that exist in Turkish language is related to agricultural life,farming activities and some animal names which don't exist in Mongolia or Manchuria.
When we see the DNA samples from Scythian kurgans,that show us r1az93-94 genes, people might think those people who were burried in kurgans are part of Indo-European people but according to ancient Chinese records Turks look like Caucasians,which fits in genetic researches. Also the Issyk inscriptions become more meaningful if scientists try do decipher the language according to Turkish language rules insteading of Indo-European linguistic rules. Cavalry culture has also remained among Turks but we can not see this culture's continuation in Iran or other European people.
So, We have two hypotheses. 1st: Turks are assimilated Indo-Europeans.,2nd: Scythian Empire ruling class were Turks while majority of citizens were Iranian but we see the R1az93-94 genes in modern day Turkish people as well as we see it in Central Asia Turks. If Turks were assimilated Indo-Europeans,then we must congratulate the Asiatic nomads who forced thousands of people to live with Turkish culture,habbits,beliefs but in the history we see that Turks always lost their identity when they conquered a new place and where they become minorities,so this hypotesis is not logical. 2nd hypotesis is more logical according to Chinese Records saying that "Turks immigrated from west of Caspian Sea" , and Herodot's tales about Yurkae people and Amazons (women warriors which is very common in ancient Turks), and immigration of Az people around 1st century according to ancient Roman records and the scrypts we see in Scandinavia...
Swedish scientists have researches about the Turks' migration and notes about Odin's migration from somewhere called Turkland. The similarity between Viking Runes and Turkic runes all across Asia is an evidence for this migration.
If this Altay-Tanrı Mountains hypotesis were true,then Turkish language should have lots of similarity in prehistoric era words with Mongolian and other central Asia local languages,but with the light of philology and genetic researches,what we see is a migration from Urals to inner Asia. Even the word "tarım" (farming) is one of the oldest words in Turkish language and not similar to any Mongol-Manchu language word. If Turks were Asiatic nomads, then all those words related to farming activities should be derived from neighbouring people's languages but we don't see such phenomenon in Turkish,instead we see too many similarity wih Hungarian.
Proto Turks mostly carry the Y-DNA haplo group N,C and Q, while Mongolians were heavily C..... All mongoloids race though N,C,Q were North East Asians mongoloids race
0:58 what happened there? Xiongnus attacked that region or what?
Mongolian Turks feel like they have history guys you're our water😂🇮🇷
Dünya gördü tarihimizi fetihlerimizi İranlıların kızlarını cariye aldıgımız günleri
1000 yıl hakimiyet ettik topraklarınızı 😂😂 sizi asmile ettik
@@rcastar9444 bro carries 1 per cent Turk DNA 💀
TENGRI BLESS THE TURKIC PEOPLE
Completely wrong. Where are Akkoyunlu, Karakoyunlu?
Where Wusun and Kangly?
They both indo-iranian tribes aka scytho-sarmatian
They both indo-iranian
@@Yokina-kana no
@@Yokina-kana this is not scientific
@@Kazakbay Genetic results show they are indo-iranian, The kazakh tribes that close to xiongnu and early medieval turks these kypchaks except kara-kypchaks, argyn, uwaq, jetiru tribes, syrgeli, oshaqty and ysty( more 70% proto-turkic ancesstry, kangly, kara-kipchaks and naimans of central kazakhstan close to sarmatian 60-70% western steppe herder origin), other tribes have turko-mongolian(50-60 proto turkic(xiongnu) and 40-50 mongolic(xianbei) such as alshyn, naiman, kerey and mongolian origin such as shapyrashty, dulat, yellow-uysin, alban, suwan and shanyshqyly who have khamag-mongolian origin they have 40-30% proto-turkic origin(xiongnu) and 50-60 mongolic(xianbei)
There is nothing correct in this video, the early ancestors of the Turks were not originally Mongoloids
Kardeşim ilk Türkler kuzey doğu asyalıdır. Moğol, Tunguzlarla aynı dnayı paylaşıyordu. C dnasıdır. Amurdan geliyor.
@@tanhukim9963moğolcu arkadaşım türkler moğollaela akraba olamaz dil açısından bakarsan benzerlik yok türklerin ilk çıktığı yer moğolistan değil bu günki hazar denizinin kuzeyi kazan bölgesi artık bilim dünyasında kabul edilen de bu.
@@ulgen1174 Türklerle Moğollar akrabadır demedim. Benzer dnaları taşır dedim. Aynı dnaları taşımak aynı ırk olunduğu anlamına gelmiyor. Türkler kazandan çıkma değil, kuzeydoğu asyalıdır. Kazandan çıkma yalanını Avrupa'ya yakın olabilmek için uyduruyorlar. Kim kabul ettiyse yalan dolan.
turks were never the same as europeans
@joker
But turks try it. They ashamed about eastasien or meditteranian herritage 😂😂😂😂
Turkey's western and Mediterranean coasts may be darker in color. For an average Mediterranean and Aegean Turk, these rates easily exceed 25%-30%. Just like the Northern Turkmens in Turkmenistan. And as an added bonus, Turkics are not 100% East Eurasian, so Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan shouldn't be this dark either. If we are talking about Turkic genetics, it also carries a serious Mongolian and Siberian heritage from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Just like a Turkmen carries Caucasian and similar heritage.
Kazakhstan wasn't that populated so therefore they are larger of turkic ancestry
Max ancestry 60%
They won but at what cost
All people are mixed except andamanese and khoisan
@@Yokina-kana true lol
How is Turkey? They was borned so late? Where was they before? Where did they come from?
The ancestors of the Turks of Turkey conquered Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq and Arabia in the 1030s from the east of the Caspian Sea, that is, the territory of Turkmenistan, and established the "Seljuk Empire". They defeated the Byzantine Emperor in 1071 and settled in Anatolia. After the Seljuk Empire collapsed, it was divided into many parts. Then the Ottoman Empire in the west. In the east, the Safavid Empire was born again, and the Ottoman Empire was dissolved in 1919 after the First World War, and the Republic of Turkey was established on the remaining lands.
@@Mali_58-n2c thanks for your infor, 😊😊😊😊😊😊
Where can I download the soundtrack?
are mongols really turkic?
Theoretically this can be.
No
@Heinzguderian1889what about mongoloid
@@Scythian_nomadye