The New Leica Q3 43 Unboxing and Initial Impressions. Can this replace my Q3?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @watchmedicine7747
    @watchmedicine7747 2 місяці тому +2

    Personally I would switch from my Q2 to a Q3 in a heartbeat but my Q2 is a reporter so hopefully they bring the Q3 reporter or safari version …

  • @jurrevandermeer4857
    @jurrevandermeer4857 18 днів тому +1

    Wait not even a simple protective filter??? That would be insane😮

  • @camerafusion
    @camerafusion 2 місяці тому +2

    Great job SC! I’ve heard the grey leatherette looks better in person? If they make a reporter edition for this beauty, I’m all in!

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому

      Yes, this grey color looks very nice in person, better than I expected.

  • @kevinhan721
    @kevinhan721 2 місяці тому +7

    Personally i dont like grey body, prefer black body. I wish it had internal storage same as current M11 (64gb) or M11P (256gb). Not having internal storge is a cheap and bad move by Leica. Will wait for Q4 43mm

  • @thanyawong
    @thanyawong 2 місяці тому +1

    Nice review. May I ask about the hood? If you put the hood of Leica Q3 to the lens of the new Q3 43, will you have a problem to put the filter in macro mode? If there is no problem, I will order the third party hood of Leica Q3 to use with my Q3 43. Thank you.

    • @julesc5571
      @julesc5571 2 місяці тому +2

      I’ve seen a video that suggests the og Q3 hood doesn’t sit square, and if you try to line it up it’s too loose.

    • @stephenelliott7071
      @stephenelliott7071 2 місяці тому +1

      A work around solution: ua-cam.com/video/Yx4vtNHDuCo/v-deo.html

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому +1

      I just tried my Q3 hood on my Q3 43. It fits, but the threads do not line up, so it is not oriented correctly when screwed on.

    • @julesc5571
      @julesc5571 2 місяці тому

      All very well having a work round, but I kinda feel I don’t want to be faffing around with hacks straight out the box when I’ve just spent £5900!

  • @t87h21
    @t87h21 2 місяці тому +2

    No. I have owned the Leica Q3 since May this year and the 60 MP sensor is enough to crop to a higher focal length. I wouldn't sell my Leica Q3 for that, but anyone considering buying one can weigh it up. It's a question of whether you prefer 28/35/50 or 43/60/75. Maybe in a few years I'll complement my Q3 with an upcoming Q4 43. I also like the black design better than the gray one.

    • @lelandfitz1762
      @lelandfitz1762 2 місяці тому

      It feels like the concept of the Q always was to deliver options from widest possible, thus 28mm. Yet, as a lot of people wanted to have higher focal length Leica decided for this version instead of another Q Monochrom. I guess time will tell if the 43 will just be another niche special edition like Monochrom or if in future Q models we will see 28 and 43 come out the same time for choice.

    • @stephenelliott7071
      @stephenelliott7071 2 місяці тому +1

      Yes you can, but you won't get the character of a longer focal length - such as DOF.

  • @berndvandecruys
    @berndvandecruys 2 місяці тому +3

    that's quite the APO collection you are building there 🙂

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому

      Yes, 35-50-75, and now this surprise release. Now I just need to decide which Q3 to keep, or both.

    • @berndvandecruys
      @berndvandecruys 2 місяці тому +1

      @@sc1 I will have my first hands on experience with the Q3 43 this weekend. The APO 43mm seems like the perfect lens imo. On paper, I would keep that one over the 28mm.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому

      @@berndvandecruysI’m looking forward to your opinion. I love the style of your videos.

  • @lelandfitz1762
    @lelandfitz1762 2 місяці тому

    First I hear about the issue with filters and macro. But as you mention it, it's about how Leica sells their APO lenses with the sepcial hood. Altough it seems at first glance to be a decision to make them both the same length.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому

      Yes, the executive decision was made for a shorter lens.

  • @Sojourner88
    @Sojourner88 2 місяці тому +4

    Shipping it with a completely flat battery is really poor form. Batteries should not be stored fully flat or fully charged.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому

      There are air cargo restrictions about how many charged batteries that can be on a plane. It can present a hazard. Leica normally transports batteries by cargo ship, But I suspect they flew the Q3 43’s by plane.

    • @Sojourner88
      @Sojourner88 2 місяці тому

      @@sc1 Yes, but if there is a limit it is usually at 50% capacity, sometimes 30% never zero. Zero is very bad for batteries.

  • @iraklisun1701
    @iraklisun1701 2 місяці тому +3

    😀 43 mm is good

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому

      I hope so.

  • @carlosvreugdenhil2072
    @carlosvreugdenhil2072 2 місяці тому

    THERE IS A FILTER FOR IT AND YOU CAN USE THE LENS HOOD.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому

      The filter will not fit within the hood while in macro mode. Leica states this in the manual.

  • @GurmeetSingh-fr8uo
    @GurmeetSingh-fr8uo 2 місяці тому +1

    Sony A7RV is much better than Q3 43

    • @nelsonclub7722
      @nelsonclub7722 2 місяці тому +5

      Different - not better

    • @t87h21
      @t87h21 2 місяці тому +6

      This statement is not entirely correct. Sony, in combination with the GM lenses, is an absolute weapon when it comes to work. The Q3 impresses with its significantly better workmanship/design. For many people, it is not just a camera, this camera gives emotions. The RAW files also have something very special, much more three-dimensional. It is the cherry on the cake that ultimately makes this small but noticeable difference. As a Sony and Leica owner, this statement is too general.

    • @thinkpadx60
      @thinkpadx60 2 місяці тому +1

      @@t87h21 if a leica then only M series, love the Ms

  • @RouvenKasten
    @RouvenKasten 2 місяці тому +1

    Unpopular opinion: The new Leica Q3/43 patent of Panasonic / Japan optics, housing and assembly Portugal, price "Wetzlar", i feel a bit fooled.

    • @xiayu6665
      @xiayu6665 2 місяці тому +1

      leica is not very good at design the autofocus,so they had to co design the lens with panasonic,major optical designed by leica,autofocus by panasonic,also panasonic patent this lens,so leica wouls save on paten fee.The camera is fully assemble in germany.Your are just a pathetic cheap ass,and fool like you said,you never will be able to afford nice thing,it is not other people fault.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 місяці тому +5

      No problem of the optic designers being of Japanese origin. We don’t discriminate. Not everyone involved needs to be ‘born in Germany’. This is the reality of the current global supply chain.
      All Portugal facilities are regulated and inspected up to Leica standards. Yes, everything is coordinated through WETZLAR. That is the home base. That’s why it is priced and labeled as WETZLAR.
      If you prefer every single part and piece designed and manufactured in WETZLAR, be prepared to pay triple or quadruple.

  • @koobs4549
    @koobs4549 2 місяці тому

    Bokeh is the Japanese word for blurry, it is pronounced bo-kay