STEAM Speaker Series: UAP: A SCIENTIFIC INTERPRETATION
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- Speaker: Kevin Knuth, Ph.D.
The STEAM Speaker Series at Delaware County Community College is proud the present Dr. Kevin Knuth on the topic “UAP: A Scientific Interpretation”, February 20-28.
Dr. Kevin Knuth is an Associate Professor of Physics at University at Albany with over two decades of experience in machine learning algorithms for Astrophysics, Bayesian Probability Theory, Information Theory, Robotics, Signal Processing, Neuroscience, Nonlinear Dynamics, Quantum Mechanics, and many other areas. He’s also the editor of the peer-review open-access journal “Entropy”, as well as being a member of the Scientific Coalition for Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Studies.
He recently published a scientific report, “Estimating Flight Characteristics of Anomalous Unidentified Aerial Vehicles”. In his paper, he described UAPs as reportedly being “structured craft that exhibit ‘impossible flight characteristics’. He explored the “5 observables of UAPs“, which are positive lift, Sudden Acceleration, Hypersonic Velocity without Signatures, Trans-Medium Travel, and Low Observability. His team performed analysis on the 2004 Nimitz Tic Tac encounters, and describe these craft as having “Estimated accelerations range from almost 100 g to 1000s of gs with no observed air disturbance, no sonic booms, and no evidence of excessive heat,” and, ”observed flight characteristics of these craft are consistent with the flight characteristics required for interstellar travel.”
Is anyone saying “please stfu so I can hear the man!” - interrupting every 10 seconds for NO reason - I digress, very informative and thought provoking!
"stfu" Excellent!
I can’t believe that you got Dr Knuth personally to explain the basics. The audience needs to know, he is one of the world’s outstanding, leading scientists studying the phenomenon. There are several interviews with him online. He comes across as such a likable, down to earth person able to explain the concepts in a way understandable to everyone. Can you imagine having him as a professor in college ? This must be such a pleasure.
I LOVE that man Kevin. I will forever respect him for doing this. Seriously.
He thought logically about this whole thing from his scientific standpoint and actively pursued it. Against everyone and disregarding the crooked look he was gunna get from he colleagues.
🙏 thank u bro.
Professor Knuth has been doing this a long time and is just one of the legendary physics teachers at UAlbany. Super glad to see the professional community taking this stuff seriously. We really need to be giving professor Knuth a lot of credit for sticking his head out there regarding UAPs and risking his long career to push forward further research in the area. Very little debate can be presernted when you have a strong physics explanation for things compared to people of the past who are often times astronomers.
60 degrees below zero...these things must have some kind of super conducting materials...i wish we can figure out what they are and soon...we need this...next stage of technological advancement.
We need more scientists like this guy, at the age where he says he has the time but still the inquisitive mind.
Thank you both for this video. I particularly enjoyed the brief section on identifying fake photos. I can imagine that being part of the core curriculum of a dedicated field of study of the future.
Good video, there is some new stuff here. Keep up the great work Kevin
Very interresting and informative ! A big thanks for this and taking this subject seriously !
I was so excited when it finally clicked what this talk was going to be about!
Crazy how we interpret "acknowledgment" and "disclosure" to come from bodies that continuously lie.
Fascinate me is the variety of aircraft that we are seeing for instance if you look at Captain terauchi flight 1628 the object that approached the cockpit for using plasma like thrusters to maintain control they were flashing colours Salomon orange and green looks like a pack of cigarettes on its side whereas these objects are not using any type of apparent thermal energy
I find it very interesting that most of the time this things are observed over the water and even going into the water which leads me believe they live under the oceans and they have been here longer that humans….
Exactly !
Not really... some were seen dropping from 80000 ft....they could be extraterrestrial and not terrestrial.
Very informative talk.. We are in need to hear more form professor Knuth.. ✌️
Bravo 👏 desde Camuy, Puerto Rico 🇵🇷
Aloha, Engineer here. Saw them upclose several times. One occasion revealed..or I was shown.. a good portion on how the drive works and now I am experimenting with a Positive-Displacement-Drive. Need alien input...would make things easier.
This interviewer interrupts the guest NON STOP. he talks over him, repeatedly, stops him, over and over. Holy crap the guest had the patience of saint! He did the guest and the audience a serious disservice.
Yea frustratingly rude and annoying
Wouldn't we need a good working knowledge of quantum gravity before drawing any conclusions about how these things work? I'm not an expert but it seems like that would be an important consideration. Thanks for the video my friend, good stuff. 👍 👍
When he says 60 degrees below zero is he talking Celius or Fahrenheit? When he said how cold the tic tac was?
Fahrenheit.
Neutrinos at 0°K 🌡 to power frame of reference to source. Standard Model is Periodic Table. The math is perfect, drop the weight onto check ✔ valve Mechanical Equivalent of Heat, you'll go UAP technology.
@@channelwarhorse3367 Are you gonna post this under every comment now?
@@jotcw81 Drop the circle below the electromagnetic force. Pictures 📷 on me research channel videos 📹 demonstrating how the UAP technology, also UAP weapon demonstration. Perhaps the Unviseral Engine Application 📖 📕 which has an actual propane tank in it, is more appropriate to post 📫, teaching the math, clean energy manufacture, UAP technology manufacture? Are you trying to manufacture the technology or just hoping the Aliens are going to provide 😆 🤣?
@@channelwarhorse3367 What you are repeatedly posting here is not a coherent statement with any assignable meaning. Maybe you are trying to express something that does have some kind of logical content, but if that is the case you are not stating it in any fashion that is interpretable by anyone but yourself. That leads most of us to conclude that it is BS.
Multiple varieties of these crafts are showing up my conclusion is that they're not coming from the same place
Exciting times
Very, very interesting interview! Thanks
UAP hasn’t been seen for hundreds of years, it’s been seen for thousands of years. The Romans used to call them flying shields 2000 years ago. It’s super interesting because I too really want to know the who, what, where, when, why and how just like millions possibly billions of people do. I think there are many Nobel prizes to be won in this field.
Sailing out of Dana Point Harbor around 1991 n a very calm day bright sunny day. We saw an object under the boat. Our sails were down and we were going to do some fishing. I was looking very the side and saw it pretty far down. It slowly rose to the surface it was a silver white color. It was longer than our 25’ sailboat. And it slightly broke the surface about 10 feet away.
It sat for about 40 seconds and sank away really fast. It was not a whale, I’ve seen hundreds of whales. We thought it was some sort of submarine. But it was totally smooth. It seemed to be shaped like an elongated lens. It was actually pretty terrifying because it was so big and not anything the we recognized. They guy I was sailing with had been in the Royal Netherlands Navy with lots of time at sea. He was pretty confused.
WOWWOWWOWWOWWOW!!!!!!!
A craft dose not travel the universe and show up and crash or let itself be seen if it doesn't want to be seen. So IF this is ET then it wants to be seen or it wants to leave materials behind.
Why would they care if they are seen or not?
They are so utterly technologically superior to human technology, they have nothing to be afraid of. Even if some morons decide to shoot at them they can just zap off in a split second. No terrestrial weapon system is able to hit them.
@@R2BMusicCH That is what I was saying. Go,listen to Jacques Vallee. Everything that we are seeing or experiencing is what they want us to see,feel . Its there agenda
Maybe, I like these hypotheticals. There are other potential explanations though. Obviously a catastrophic failure seems very unlikely, but it might happen. Maybe there are many thousand out there every day and one crashes very seldomly. Alternatively you could imagine an act of sabotage from one rogue member of the crew, or even multiple groups of ETs sabotaging each others experiments. Maybe the pilot of crashed ships slept with another alien's husband, lover's quarrel.
You're talking about the motivations of aliens, there's no way to get such a simple cut and dry answer, if these are intelligently designed craft we're going to need a lot more information before we can speculate about motivations. We're going to need to know what they are and what they are doing before we can figure out why.
This implies there is a construct or constructs that are infallible for all of time. Given entropy and quantum mechanics being based on probability and sometimes chaotic dynamics, I say this guarantees that accidents will happen and crashes. And even if this hypothetical and possibly impossible infallible for all of time technology exists, a fallible biological creature operating can make mistakes, have a heart attack (or something similar in it's own biology) slip on something or simply get distracted. Infallibility doesn't seem to be in the realm of our universe.
@@deejin25 I don't understand anything your trying to say. And I'm pretty sure you know most people would not understand it either. So I'm pretty sure your trying to impress people in the comment section of youtube with your big vocabulary.
They reserved a techno seed. (7 fold!) Peace@Love
18:46 Precognitive Retro causality and quantum mechanics.
What does it mean that the object is cold? What flying objects could be in that temp?
-60 Celsius is the temp at 40000m altitude. Airliners get that cold at 12000m. -60 simply means that the Ufo stays in the cool aera. It does not mean supercooled circuitry in the UAP. Also, they likelymeasured atmospheric temperatures rather than ship temp.
How is disabling nukes a "serious problem?" For whom?
Sounds like a serious solution to me.
Disabling is the mirror image of arming / launching them. It’s a potential nightmare problem.
@@megamillionfreak pls explain.
@@nicelydunwell5681 Go get a community college electronics class somewhere.
Does your stupidity make you angry, or does your anger make you ignorant? Great supporting argument, btw. You should run for office
@@nicelydunwell5681 Уеаh, ОК геtагd.
Interesting that the term “ALIEN” which covers all possibilities is the term that has been made to be a taboo. The term alien isn’t necessarily aliens from another planet; anything that isn’t of human technology, be it from another dimension, a different timeline, another planet or an unknown from earth, is an “ALIEN” event.
Technically bigfoot, if exists, could be considered alien.
So true...but being raised in that environment from school and everyday life pushed us to associate alien to other planets. Takes some time to break out of that kind of thinking.
A point re UAP invasion of national sovereignty - historically sovereignty is based on a nation's ability to enforce it. Historically, it has very much based the level of a nation's technology - eg the 3 mile limit of national sovereignty over oceans was because 3 miles was the practical limit of coastal cannons - nations could not practically enforce sovereignty beyond that. As military defensive capability improved, national sovereignty over the seas was extended to 12, then 200 miles.
Sovereignty over land was extended in a similar manner. The United States sovereignty over it's land is based, originally, on European sovereignty which was claimed over North American land. This sovereignty was based upon the European ability to enforce it with the technology it had. This technology was initially based on tech that the native Americans did not have - ie steel and gun powder. That and European diseases ended native american's ability to defend their lands.
Today we are faced with a situation where the difference between our culture and an "other" culture's technology is clearly much greater than the difference between eg the Spanish Conquistadors and Moctezuma's society. If we cannot enforce national sovereignty over air space against these UAP's, then, by our own society's rules expressed over many centuries, that sovereignty does not exist. It belongs to who can claim it, and in the case of these UAP's, the skies belong to them.
I think, given the difference in apparent tech, and given that UAP's do not show aggression, would be a bad idea to behave aggressively towards them, since if our belligerence annoyed them enough to respond to it, it would not end well for us. I think it is a much better idea to simply analyze them as best as we can, and attempt to open a channel of communication with them.
For all we know they have been here a very long time. They may have been here before modern humans evolved. They may feel they have as great a right to exist on Earth as we do, and I doubt they believe human military organisations have a right to tell them where they can fly. This is a very interesting situation.
So what are the hypotheses? (Beyond the prosaic, hoaxes).
Visitors from other planets,
Visitors from other dimensions (parallel universes),
Unknown form of intelligent life from earth,
Time travelers from the future,
What else?
Some say “demons”. I would wager it’s time traveling, psychotronic, metric engineering sentient AI from our future.
I feel sorry for the two guys trying to figure out the software. I was born into an analog world too.
Wow, to manufacture UAP materials, begin by water column, mercury column resource heavy. Drop the weight onto check ✔ valve Mechanical Equivalent of Heat ⛓ 💡
if the UAP technology is built upon a force field technology then even though from external perspective they are going many thousands of miles an hour in between fighter jets in formation, from the perspective of inside the uap it would feel like 60mph, modifying the spacetime around the craft. theory of special relativity.
in some sense the only way these crafts can exhibit the abilities they do is with an understanding of quantum gravity using force field technology. there are many claims of them "fueling up" sucking up water possibility separating the hydrogen from oxygen.
it is all very eye opening.
We don't even have to go as far as assuming exotic physical concepts.
One kg of matter contains 9 x 10¹⁶ joules of energy. That's an experimentally proven fact based on Einstein's E = mc².
Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe and it's the best suited for nuclear fusion.
Any technology that's able to harness and bring to use such a huge amount of energy in a relatively small craft has quasi unlimited possibilities for propulsion systems.
The other factor is the material science that makes these craft do manoeuvres which would rip current earthly craft apart.
@@johnjacquard863 yes it is absolutely eye opening. I question whether or not they actually depend on a propulsion system. Also, I have to lean in the direction that some or all entities are non dependent on oxygen. Do they even breathe? If they do, whatever it may be, this would require yet another onboard system if we assume there 'is' a propulsion and/or navigation system. And this also includes the assumption that some types of craft are piloted.
@@billsmith987 It's rather unlikely that especially the TicTac UAPs have any biological organism on board.
Unmanned robotic space probes for scientific research are nothing exotic. Humans have been sending them up for decades, just nowhere near the observed performance.
@R2BCH2 possibilities but still only speculation with regard to pilots. As far as nothing exotic? There are exotic entities here and i have to assume they are investigating on some level. I think you have to specify what you would consider a space probe.
So apparently they're using superconductivity, they must use a cryogenic system to achieve that
no
Who's 'They' ?
@@tonystephen6312 right?
@@curiousbystander9193 Remember years ago superconducting magnets causing metal ring to levitate!
@@tonystephen6312 levitating metal rings and a ship sized torsion field device are so different.
Please allow guests to speak without interruption. Good job otherwise!
Government Tech the question is which government?
You notice when they fly in formation they fly then unusual staggered formation and they always in groups of 12 to 16 even when they went to Washington Airport 1952 same around number 16 objects showed up the Mexican military police looking for drug smugglers picked up eight of the objects I think they might have missed a few but that's their consistent MO
As an interviewer your job is to ask a question then shut up and listen to the answer. Talking over the interviewee is not just very bad manners but also can cause the interviewee to lose their train of thought. For goodness sake shut up and listen.
Some people never outgrow a number of infantile traits.
Don't be so relieved we are developing such a device the patents for the Navy have been filed for a device that has these capabilities
Where is your source?
There's no way such fundamentally groundbreaking technology would have gone unnoticed for many decades. Academia is very communicative. The underlying physical theories would have leaked, no doubt.
Why do some people believe that the military has monopolised the brightest and most secretive scientists in the world? Smacks of some QAnonsense conspiracy bunk.
This would be multiple Nobel prize stuff. No way it would have never leaked.
@@R2BMusicCH The patents do exist, try a search and a bit of open mindedness before spouting that sort of attitude. Admittedly it is surprising that it’s not more well known, though in the last two years it is becoming more so. An interesting question would be why it’s barely known about and discussed, but even more so is whether the patents are for viable machinery or are speculative, or more interestingly whether they are ‘red herrings’… 😉
@@misdangered4326 The rigour of the scientific method is clearly defined.
First you come up with an hypothesis. If the hypothesis can be confirmed by experiment and/or observation and if it can be mathematically represented it becomes a scientific theory.
This theory will have to be reproducible and go through the scrutiny of peer review.
If the reviews detect flaws or errors the theory has to be updated or scrapped.
A patent is worthless if it crumbles under close and careful scrutiny of the underlying scientific basis.
So if someone claims they have a blueprint for a flying object, shaped like a gas cylinder (aka TicTac), defying gravity and air friction, with no apparent propulsion, accelerating from naught to Mach 10 in a fraction of a second and without any sonic booms there better be a very robust underlying physics theory which allows for such kind of engineering.
Once again, there is no way such a groundbreaking discovery would have gone unnoticed in academia for many decades.
@@R2BMusicCH but there are patents lol. Just look it up. I think the debrief did an article on it I might be wrong.
I might add, patents are not evidence of even proof of concept. Only concept as far as I know.
There Bugs!!
This Professor is a dude!!
I would love if they'd saturate the audience with as much random knowledge as possible. Call it "time to ramble" and add it to their presentation.
All this is based on hearsay, for sure. Not a single decent vid and yet we run and run and run with it. All because there's a market for it. Yet, I wish Art Bell was around to take it all in.
A lot of your facts are just wrong, interesting stuff none the less.
It really scares me when a physicist says he cannot understand how a craft like a UAP can withstand the force of 1700 g's. Whether or not you believe Bob Lazar's account, you should listen to his explanation as to how these craft function. Forget the controversy of the man, and listen to his explanation as to how they perform. It's all there and even a physicist should understand!! The craft is in a gravitational distortion and within its own space/time, - and therefore completely isolated from ours. There' is no inertia involved while the craft is within this gravitational distortion. These craft use a field propulsion system, rather than an action/reaction system like a propeller driven aircraft, jet, or rocket. Instead of throwing something out the back to move forward, they use a gravitational field propulsion system, which isolates them from the effects of earth's gravity. Instead of being pushed forward, these craft are pulled forward by the gravitational field they produce out in front of them. Yes Prof, they do all use this same propulsion system.
The nuclear 'strong force' is simply another form of gravity that all UAPs take advantage of by first generating, and then amplifying a gravitational field by the use of a stable isotope of heavy element 115, whose gravitational field extends beyond the atom and therefore is accessible.. Just watch Bob Lazar's 'Excerpts from the Government Bible'.
He hasn't changed his story in thirty years. Even 'Tic Tac' pilot commander Fravor has met with Lazar and had dinner together, along with their wives. Don't discount the obvious. Take some time before you shoot down the answers you've been looking for. (an isotope of element 115 is necessary and can by thought of as the fuel that makes this possible) He's been raided twice now by an alphabet soup of agencies who are looking for the element 115 he's thought to have stolen some 30 years ago. No arrests, but they sure looked through everything in his home and business. Even the claim they were looking for a customer invoice involving the murder of a Michigan citizen doesn't warrant the abc of Federal agencies conducting the raid.
@pUrP!€ @nArX!$t Actually we, - as in you and I don't have proof because it's jealously guarded. Proof exists along with the explanation as to how these vehicles work. Obviously there's a lot of kooks, worshippers, and other crazies associated with the topic, - just as the government wishes it. Conspiracies and crazies aside, there are credible sources from the inside with answers.
They are craft whether you can accept that or not. Listen to the astronaut Gordon Cooper's account of one landing when he was stationed in Germany. Listen to his account of his men filming the event with a motion picture camera and sending it to Washington by special military courier, - never to be seen again. You can find it on UA-cam if you bother looking for it.
The interview is with Gordon Cooper himself and was filmed some years ago. He categorically stated that the craft landed for a minute or two and then took off again. All caught on camera, and all pretty damned close.
@pUrP!€ @nArX!$t Whatever you wish to believe is fine with me. I'm not here to convince you or anyone else who wishes to ignore the obvious. I also won't discount the dozens of military men, scientists, astronauts and other professionals accounts. You've already made up your mind and won't believe it until one lands on your lawn.
@pUrP!€ @nArX!$t You're arguing with yourself and losing.
@pUrP!€ @nArX!$t You've been on UA-cam for less than a week and already solved the unified field theory. Purple Muppets means I'm talking to a child. You can't prove a lot of things by sight alone muppet. There are far more senses we can rely upon. Sensors have become so sophisticated we can detect an object the size of a baseball in low earth orbit. We can tell you its trajectory and velocity without seeing it with the naked eye. Please, you're welcome to continue arguing with yourself.
professor David Cross
....listen to his voice hahaha
Old old old old regurgitated old blah blah. this is reading the bible, only worse.