I think this could've been a win if instead of expecting the skorp to just throw his tank away so you can clean up you should've forced the VZ to pick a target by performing a pincer. You come up behind him and he either turns turret to you or keeps on skorp, you can peek from behind buildings and skorp was good enough to do the same. Wouldn't have mattered what gun he had he cant traverse fast enough.
Yeah, normally go in at the same time but still behind those buildings might work. Maybe QB should just move to the place where can sandwich VZ, and the result might be deferent.
you lost because you were too careful there was no point waiting at the end, if you went in while he was aiming at scorpion you had an easy win before you
he does this exact same thing from time to time where he makes fights too complicated or is just too careful, maybe when he knows he is doing a video for viewers he plays a little different because of it
You could've tanked the shot, and the Skorpion could've killed the vz in 1 shot. I don't know why he should've tanked for you. He could've killed him in 1 shot, you had to put 2 shots in.
Yea i thout the same, if the VZ had awsome armor i would say yea the K-91 has better pen but the VZ's armor on the hull is kinda weak, over 90% pen for the Skorpion's prem ammo.They rushed the end.
Instead of blaming the scorpion you could have rushed in and flanked. At that point the scorpion would have been able to get a side shot or smething else. The problem is that you wanted to win for yourself, not even thinking about sacrificing your tank for the win
My thoughts exactly. With 7k damage, QB probably felt like the whole battle depended only on his decisions. He took everything into his hands, not putting any trust into his team mate. In 2v1 situation it's obvious it doesn't matter who will tank shots or sacrifice his tank. You just go together and one will stay alive to put the enemy down from point blank.
In my opinion, you should never sacrifice your tank and let the game in another player's hands, especially when you are a 1 shot while that other guy is not... You have no idea how many games I've lost because I sacrificed my tank in the end just to turn a turret away from my allies, hoping they'll finish the job and... DEFEAT. Random players are never to be trusted. And this skorpion tanked 2 freaking hits without even returning fire...
Sorry QB, you should not have stayed hidden at the end. The mere presence would have startled the Vz and given the Skorpion a better chance. You should probably even have driven in to take one shot and then leave the mop-up to the Skorpion.
no.. 1 vs 1 VZ can prolly take on skorp with his mobilty... he only needs to stay safe for 20 seconds.. skorp def should have gone all in on that imo. but he was tracked and prolly didnt have a rep kit. Unlucky... ig VZ was lucky right from the begining of that game.
@@dinzzz0000 exactly... Skorpion should've tanked one hit and RETURN FIRE............... instead he chose to take 2 freaking hits (FROM A SINGLE SHOT GUN LOL) without ever returning fire.......
seen so many of wot youtubers say never go one by one against an enemy tank when you got multiple tanks on your team and this is exactly what he did by going one by one.From the outstart,I could only hear "me me me" in the commentary.Gotta take one for the team sometimes to secure a win.
regardless what gun he had you could have just kept your speed and went in, skorpion was a good player and would have followed and one of you would not have a gun aimed your way. easy to be captain hindsight, harder when you were there ofc, but the mistake was stopping.
Yes that is true. QB could have swung right in the city to increase angle between the VZ and him. So the skorpion is directly in front and QB is directly behind the VZ. He can't turn fast enough in that situation.
I mean I disagree, VZ 55 cannot point his turret at the same direction so if you just went in together with both your reloads there’s no way he could win
I would've gone to the right since skorp is on the left. But that's pretty intense situation and having dealt a lot of damage makes you kinda think you're better than your team so you're willing to sacrifice them instead of yourself lmao
@@helpinghelper4151 Yeah and I disagree with his explanation, even with the autoloader he cannot kill both players in time if they were to commit together
i mean not really the vz can choose to take out qb first bc that’s the smarter play and then the scorpion can bounce on the vz 55 and vz reload and then kills scorpion
I don't have QBs experience but think he played selfishly at the end, if both of them had gone in at the same time and QB not fecked around tryna do the fancy knowledgable play, they woulda won I bet.
You'll notice as you get more experienced that QB isn't really that good as he wants to make everyone else believe he is. He'll always blame others and never admit when he makes a mistake.
You have to be selfish to win if you have high win rate. If you sacrifice yourself to a lower win rate player, you are putting all the pressure to them and they might not handle the situation correctly. It is just like rushing in to spot 15 players and die, you did good, but your team won't be good enough to carry you. In this battle, if they gone at the same time, the VZ will shoot QB first if they are good player, just as QB said. Then you are depending on the scorpion to not throw the game. In hindsight if you know the VZ is single shot, ofc QB should and would go at the same time, or use another strategy.
Yep, there's a helluva lot of 'the Skorp should've done this or that' but the VZ can't shoot two tanks at once. QB goes when he hears the Skorp shot it would've been a win.
He literally apologizes for that exact same thing, and states what would they should have done had they not second guessed themselves. And this is Quickybaby, pro beyond pros. He was right to trust his instincts but that won’t work 100% of the time, lucky this is just a video game lol
You should have just engaged the Vz55. If you get close he would need to turn either towards you or keep aiming at the scorpion, so one of you would have a shot at him at any time. And even if he'd killed you, he would have had only one shot for the scorpion who could have fired twice in return before the vz reloads. I know, its easy to say afterwards, but it's kinda unfair to say 'what the scoprion should have done to win'.
I was thinking the same, while qb was waiting it was visible VZ wasn’t aiming towards him, he could’ve engage, put one shot in, then try to end the game one way or another
With all the trouble WoT goes to calculate pen, then throws 25% RNG in there??? Why bother, makes no sense. RNG on trajectory and (especially) damage yes, but it should not be on pen.
A Skorpion is more than potent to take out the vz, if you both engage at the same time, you get taken out, the skorp will miss, then the skorp gets a round and has roughly 20 second to secure the winning shot
Correct play would have been to get on VZ's back and see if he turns his turret to you or keeps it towards Scorpion. If he still keeps Scorp at gun sight, you can shoot him from the back. If he turns to react to you Scorp can shoot him. This was the worst tactic that you chose. You did the worst thing that number advantage can give....which is: go 1 by 1.
Great performance QB, especially in that tank, but personally i think that with so much rof You had, You should destroy that small building which he was hiding behind to put even more preasure on him. Then he had two choices, hiding his back from You (and the traverse of that tank on sand is not very good), or charge the Skorpion, which gives both of you the chance to shot first, in Your case, fire twice. Of course, as many times in this battle, the RNG could just say no, and bon voyage no matter what :D
My thoughts exactly. He wasn't gonna need those HE rounds anyway and it takes literally less than 5 seconds to fire 2 shells and destroy the entirety of that little building. That way he's got the VZ's side who's also under immense pressure from being shot at by two tanks now rather than only one.
You cant blame other players for not playing as you would or as you would have liked. You should have thought about this and taken that into consideration in your descion in how to approach. Players very seldom play as you would have. Your responsibility is your tank.
Asking a stranger to tank (die) for you so you can be the hero is so QB. Love ya, dude, but it's plays like this that really demonstrate your self-centeredness when gaming. Rather fitting that your advice here was poor and caused the team to lose. In this instance, you were the goat, not the GOAT. As always, thanks for sharing.
just because he is treating teammates as 50iq players and doesn't trust them at all, even tho Scorpion did very well securing 2 kills just before that, but no, QB thinks ONLY he can do it.
@@tomaszp1190 it’s an interesting aspect of humans that they can be nominally bright but still mill around like confused sheep. Or like, QB be able to react quickly to situational changes 🤔
you had to go out and shoot immediately after vz fired at the scorpion, it didn't matter what cannon he had, even if it was a reload cannon or not ... he would probably kill you and scorpion would kill vz .... but you wanted to you kill him on the vz, to show how much you are the hero of the fight ... shame on you ,QB.
idk how , but the rng that the czech heavies have when i play against them is crazy , like a vz55 sniping my cupola in a kranvagn , twice with the autolaoader in a row. and their armor is really troll sometimes
1. Missed shots on Vz essentially rng- can't control that every time. 2. Missed ID on Tank didn't have enough info- fog of war 3. time short and draws are losses- happens 4. expecting anyone on your team to act in your favor- you're crazy. 5. harshing on skorp- bad example to set.
Quickybaby the scorp fired. You missed that even after watching the replay at least x2? Or refuse to recognize. After he fired 1 the push should of been on reguardless he was a 2 shot for you, a 1 shot for the skorp. Had the vz turned to you scorp would of had him, if he didnt you would of had him....Scorp could of played it 2 ways & either was the right play for him there. Also if it was even the autoloader you would of had 1 clean reload for the take down but being heat you could of been relying on your 2nd reload which would of been close with the autoloader.
well I wouldn't have know what you meant by 'tank for me' and I'm an English speaker and have been playing this game for 8 years - you could have said something like 'just rush him and I will follow'
You demonstrated how to miss faster by swapping accuracy for RoF. DPM is worthless with out accuracy. You do more damage with 3 penetration hits vs. 5 shots that miss or bounce. Some vehicles have great accuracy so yeah pump that DPM, but for most tanks it is a bit too much of a trade.
My thoughts exactly. Also think about how often you are utilizing the full dpm of your tank VS how often you use the additional accuracy. You always need accuracy, but rarely do you use your full dpm
You gain 1/3 of a gun rammer and lose a whole aiming device with the field mod QB was talking about. Hence why the 122 tm is so competitive, it doesnt have dpm, but it hits every shot. I agree that is not a good choice
in agreement with the other person, DPM can only be utilised in so many ways, and with as low alpha as 320 like most russian mediums have, you can afford to lose a bit of DPM but in turn you can gain a bit more accuracy which in one way is more effective because said tank already has enough DPM
@@adambalogh7239 sorry but 122TM's dreadful ~1400 BASE DPM is a really bad joke... I know the gun's hard stats are like tier 10 gun level, but in these 3-minute 4-15 games day and age, it's such a painful experience to carry in that vehicle. And about the accuracy part: when a lot of shots go literally at the extremities of the aiming circle, 5% accuracy is not going to work regardless. People miss fully aimed shots in their Leopard 1 like there's no tomorrow, and that tank is supposed to be accurate. Accuracy began to matter way less once they changed the distribution of the shots in the aiming reticle years ago. That's why I'm not even bothering with bonuses like -0.01/0.02 to my accuracy... Just my two cents.
No, sorry QB, your assessment at the end makes no sense to me. why tank any shot at all? for me the situation looked like an safe kill, but u both managed to screw it up good. a tank can only aim in one direction at a time, so if you approached the Vz from the opposite direction he would be left with only the option which player he gives the free kill by facing towards the other. By deciding to stay out of range you made the Vz focus on the scorpion and scorpion was not willing to wait for you get into a free shot position (u had time and wasn't spotted)... then again u weren't indicating to do anything other then a greedy play to get the kill, if he tanks for you. still, scrop played as if you weren't there. so for me this just looks like a misplay. i think you just outsmarted yourself focusing too much on one possible approach to handle this rather then the classic most obvious one. Though true, in time of zerg rushes hardly anyone considers a play that takes a little time and patience, and it's risky if one cannot rule out the random ally risking something stupid and dying.
Aslain's Modpack has a handy info overlay where you can see the reload times. I always use that fair policy mod (according to WG's official mod page) to get a fair advantage and know which guns my enemies are using so I can adjust my play style accordingly :D
What about the other way around QB? What if u tanked one shot, maybe even damaging VZ who knows, and then VZ couldnt not kill Scorpion with autoloader, so Scorpion could kill him with only taking one shot? VZ was on one shot for Scorpion...
QB huge missplay in the end... I think you became more of a general than player and overthinked that situation.. Correct play would be to no faf around just go in hit VZ once and then he couldn't do aynthing.. The way you played it was literally the worst you could have done :D It doesn't matter if he use single or double shot gun .. just saying
Fucks up a play because he didn't know the Vz was using the cyclic gun. Blames the Skorp G instead. It was you fault QB dont blame the other guy for doing what you told him.
You could've gone around the buildings on the right and shot him twice before he turned his turret around. This battle also shows that 'accuracy' isn't a reliable stat, its wishful thinking.
Maybe the Skorpion wasnt aware of the Vz using the single shot gun. But still, you should have pressured the Vz by flanking, getting to the opposite side so his hands would be forced. Anyway, it's easy to be smart now..
QB well played till the end. VZ has 2 sec intraclip and you were sandwiching him from front and behind. if you just suddenly came up and shot him in the ass vz would either let you live (in which case you get 2 shots and win) or turn around to shoot you (in which case the skorp will kill him and win). it was you who should've tanked the shot or gotten in first considering your alpha
Regardless of who made mistakes at the end, its hard to ignore the amount of shots that didn't pen the Vz that should have... if only one of those hits pen'd, the game would have been won. Damn rng.
QB, using his friendly tanks as enemy fodder, as usual. This is the channel where I learned that screwing your teammates was the way to get your score up
Quickie, you should have pressed into the cap and closed together. You could've put in one shot, diverting the enemy's attention, but allowing the Skorpion to get the kill. You may have been destroyed, but would've been victorious for your team.
I don't want to brag, but I guessed the VZ had the single shooter from the first shot. He moves to cover immediately after shooting the first shot, instead of waiting if he could shoot a second time.
After watching this video, I suddenly figured out why I have been enjoying Jingles' wot replays much more than QB's all these years: Jingles plays "normally" as most of us do, focusing more about his own performance than bossing teammates around, and acknowledging mistakes when he makes one. QB is of course a very good player, but honestly he often thinks himself too highly. And even attempting to shift blame on the Skorpion? He has just gone a bit too far I'm afraid.
I love how he calls gold round gold round when enemy uses it, but when he uses it it's high explosive anti tank round. I like QB but he's a hypocrite as fuck xd
He can't be too negative about this game because he knows he's only got another few years max to milk it before the company finally kills the game and he's left grasping for a new game to stream/promote for viewers. He's always pulling his criticism of new tanks and mechanics when you can tell he truly hates them 😂😂
actually great game for all 3 final players. skorpion payed well, tried his best- probably also got confused by non-autoloading enemy. actually qb sacrificing for him to get the kill could be also good- generally speaking you tried to "ambush" skoda instead of overwhelming him by simultaneously attacking... did not play out good, but it was impossible to tell beforehand. Very high class play i would love to be able to do one day ;) cheers :)
Sorry QB, but you shouldn't wait. You should look for a shot on him from behind, while he was focused on Scorpion. If he would turn towards you scorp. Could finish him and you are fast enough to run into cover. This was on you buddy.
Kinda interesting to see this tank in wot pc, im a wot blitz player, and the K-91 over there is a lot different from here. First of all, the turret is mounted at the middle of the tank, and it is a heavy tank, with a 3 shell autoloader. Its pretty strong too.
It's good to know that even the best can make mistakes. Would almost ask that any three-game video include at least one losing match and why you believe you lost.
mentioning leopard in the beginning was uncalled for, it would do a better job than k91 in pretty much everything from the video.. regardless, great video!
Exciting battle and video. Demonstrating what would happen if player hesitates in the battle, even for QB. This game is getting so much more complicated (and suffering) than I used to play before, with so many meta tanks and the good-old-F RNG...... Keep up the great work! Happy holidays!
12:11 Story of my later tanking career and why I've taken over a year break now. The game has told me, "NO! Sit there and take L. You're not allowed to beat this player in particular." so often that I'm just done. That's just not fair. Granting opposing players immunity from me while they are granted every shot possible on me.
I've been using the tactical zoom out view a lot to see more detail around me that you couldn't really see before, such as fences and trees being knocked down far away or teammates getting tracked.
yeah quite contrary, like most are saying here, I think the better play might've been to be more aggressive and you actually be the one to tank the shot and create pressure. the scorp then would've had the HP to finish him off. whether the Vz had the autoloader or not.
Sry QB, but you should have been the one to tank….. coming in one at a time is lesson 1 in how not to play the game. Appreciating that you both were under a lot of pressure, the fact that the Skorpion was was understanding and following your advice should have been sufficient to trust him to pincer with you. Sun Tsu… never underestimate others, it will be your downfall.
I like how everybody is talking shit but he literally says at the end of the video he should've put more faith in the skorp and just rushed together. 😂
I said this on stream, if you would both go in you would win this 99 out of 100 times. No matter does he has autoreloader or standard gun. As you see he needed 3 shots to kill you both, you needed 1 Skorpion shot or 2 yours. If you would go first and even die Skorpion would have time and alpha to kill him, even if Skorp take one shoot. All you needed to do is to help Skorpion do that one shot. But it wouldnt look so good... Actually im supprised you made this video... And also - "tank for me" it is not obvious for non-english person, i never heard it. So bad comunication and bad play in the end of awsome battle.
@@jacobrice8849 could be, but that is the 1 out of 100 case, as ammorack, or fast reload in vz to HE. QB stayed hidden and forgot about important thing - confiusion. VZ focused Skorp and did what he should. I don't blame QB because in battle even he make bad decisisons, but i cant stand he belive that Skorp should go and die for him so QB can kill last enemy, win battle and take fame and glory for himself.
No, QB. You needed to put your pride aside and tank for that Scorpion. With the Scorpion able to take the VZ down with one shot you needed to create an opening for them.
i think the most logical play would have been to just drive up to his ass and put a round in him and if he turns go behind the buildings so that scorp could just shoot him in the side.. 2v1 is the easiest thing to win when u go n at the same time
Yeah, he's blaming the Skorp in the end. No surprise there. Ok, the single shot gun took you both by surprise.. so what? Big deal.. But no, you had to pin it on the Skorp who did a great job btw.
Have to disagree with you here QB. Just like all the other comments are saying, you could have at least gotten closer while keeping buildings between you and the VZ. In other words, you could have gotten so much closer without actually being in much danger. Then, you could have shot the VZ twice before he reloaded.
should have pushed in when that VZ had fired the first shot, no matter which gun he is using. if that had been an auto-loader, the skorpion could still have two attempts to one-shot the heavy tank (not really easy for the VZ to out-manoeuvre the skorpion provided with the buildings around that can slow its speed, plus the fact that VZ had to turn around to engage you); if that had been a single firing gun, you both could have gotten some window between the reload. The skorpion demonstrated his capabilities as, at least, a decent player by shutting down the enemy su130pm and emil without losing too many hit points.
I think this could've been a win if instead of expecting the skorp to just throw his tank away so you can clean up you should've forced the VZ to pick a target by performing a pincer. You come up behind him and he either turns turret to you or keeps on skorp, you can peek from behind buildings and skorp was good enough to do the same. Wouldn't have mattered what gun he had he cant traverse fast enough.
This. You guys were already working together, you would have been better off going in at the same time.
tru
true :D
Yeah, normally go in at the same time but still behind those buildings might work.
Maybe QB should just move to the place where can sandwich VZ, and the result might be deferent.
Yeah, it kinda seemed like he just wanted to remove the risk of dying himself.
you lost because you were too careful there was no point waiting at the end, if you went in while he was aiming at scorpion you had an easy win before you
Exactly, he shoots QB and Scorpion shoots Vz.
he does this exact same thing from time to time where he makes fights too complicated or is just too careful, maybe when he knows he is doing a video for viewers he plays a little different because of it
Facts, they shoulda rushed at the same time
Completely agree.
Why can't qb admit he lost it.
You could've tanked the shot, and the Skorpion could've killed the vz in 1 shot. I don't know why he should've tanked for you. He could've killed him in 1 shot, you had to put 2 shots in.
fair point
Yea i thout the same, if the VZ had awsome armor i would say yea the K-91 has better pen but the VZ's armor on the hull is kinda weak, over 90% pen for the Skorpion's prem ammo.They rushed the end.
Even if the Skorpion would've bounced or low-rolled, he'd still have enough time to shoot again (if the Vz. 55 was using the auto loader)
greed
Agreed
Instead of blaming the scorpion you could have rushed in and flanked. At that point the scorpion would have been able to get a side shot or smething else. The problem is that you wanted to win for yourself, not even thinking about sacrificing your tank for the win
Exactly.
My thoughts exactly. With 7k damage, QB probably felt like the whole battle depended only on his decisions. He took everything into his hands, not putting any trust into his team mate.
In 2v1 situation it's obvious it doesn't matter who will tank shots or sacrifice his tank. You just go together and one will stay alive to put the enemy down from point blank.
yea your right QB sold
It's classic CryBaby
In my opinion, you should never sacrifice your tank and let the game in another player's hands, especially when you are a 1 shot while that other guy is not... You have no idea how many games I've lost because I sacrificed my tank in the end just to turn a turret away from my allies, hoping they'll finish the job and... DEFEAT. Random players are never to be trusted. And this skorpion tanked 2 freaking hits without even returning fire...
Sorry QB, you should not have stayed hidden at the end. The mere presence would have startled the Vz and given the Skorpion a better chance. You should probably even have driven in to take one shot and then leave the mop-up to the Skorpion.
no.. 1 vs 1 VZ can prolly take on skorp with his mobilty... he only needs to stay safe for 20 seconds.. skorp def should have gone all in on that imo. but he was tracked and prolly didnt have a rep kit. Unlucky... ig VZ was lucky right from the begining of that game.
@@dinzzz0000 exactly... Skorpion should've tanked one hit and RETURN FIRE............... instead he chose to take 2 freaking hits (FROM A SINGLE SHOT GUN LOL) without ever returning fire.......
Qb was a one shot
seen so many of wot youtubers say never go one by one against an enemy tank when you got multiple tanks on your team and this is exactly what he did by going one by one.From the outstart,I could only hear "me me me" in the commentary.Gotta take one for the team sometimes to secure a win.
@@thunder7135 he fired at the same time he got shot the first time. He missed.
regardless what gun he had you could have just kept your speed and went in, skorpion was a good player and would have followed and one of you would not have a gun aimed your way.
easy to be captain hindsight, harder when you were there ofc, but the mistake was stopping.
Yes that is true. QB could have swung right in the city to increase angle between the VZ and him. So the skorpion is directly in front and QB is directly behind the VZ. He can't turn fast enough in that situation.
I mean I disagree, VZ 55 cannot point his turret at the same direction so if you just went in together with both your reloads there’s no way he could win
I would've gone to the right since skorp is on the left. But that's pretty intense situation and having dealt a lot of damage makes you kinda think you're better than your team so you're willing to sacrifice them instead of yourself lmao
He is just trying to sell you an explanation for his greedy mistake...
@@helpinghelper4151 pretty much
@@helpinghelper4151 Yeah and I disagree with his explanation, even with the autoloader he cannot kill both players in time if they were to commit together
i mean not really the vz can choose to take out qb first bc that’s the smarter play and then the scorpion can bounce on the vz 55 and vz reload and then kills scorpion
basically you turned a 2v1 into two separate 1v1 fights in the last moment
I don't have QBs experience but think he played selfishly at the end, if both of them had gone in at the same time and QB not fecked around tryna do the fancy knowledgable play, they woulda won I bet.
You'll notice as you get more experienced that QB isn't really that good as he wants to make everyone else believe he is. He'll always blame others and never admit when he makes a mistake.
@@mitasrb he admitted his mistake… in this video.
@@bravobear1844 no he didnt, he tried to shift blame lol he couldve said thats my bad. and held the L.
You have to be selfish to win if you have high win rate. If you sacrifice yourself to a lower win rate player, you are putting all the pressure to them and they might not handle the situation correctly. It is just like rushing in to spot 15 players and die, you did good, but your team won't be good enough to carry you. In this battle, if they gone at the same time, the VZ will shoot QB first if they are good player, just as QB said. Then you are depending on the scorpion to not throw the game. In hindsight if you know the VZ is single shot, ofc QB should and would go at the same time, or use another strategy.
@@bravobear1844 he did shift blame.
If you had rush at the same time with the skop, no matter the barrel, you woulda won
true
Yep, there's a helluva lot of 'the Skorp should've done this or that' but the VZ can't shoot two tanks at once. QB goes when he hears the Skorp shot it would've been a win.
QB loses the game then blames the tier 8 he was bossing around instead of his own misplay...
that's QB for ya.
QB in a nutshell
He literally apologizes for that exact same thing, and states what would they should have done had they not second guessed themselves. And this is Quickybaby, pro beyond pros. He was right to trust his instincts but that won’t work 100% of the time, lucky this is just a video game lol
@@bravobear1844 i mean they were already working together.. if they hadnt been then i understand. fact is qb wanted to be the "hero"
I agree, QB was hiding and didn't see that if they both just rushed straight away it was a win no matter the gun...
Thing is QB, the Vz could easily kill the Scorpion with 1 HE shot so you can understand why the Scorpion didn't want to just drive up and trade shots.
He wouldn't have loaded HE if he had the double shot because he wouldn't pen the k91
The idea was the skorp would die and he could kill the vz
You should have just engaged the Vz55. If you get close he would need to turn either towards you or keep aiming at the scorpion, so one of you would have a shot at him at any time. And even if he'd killed you, he would have had only one shot for the scorpion who could have fired twice in return before the vz reloads.
I know, its easy to say afterwards, but it's kinda unfair to say 'what the scoprion should have done to win'.
I was thinking the same, while qb was waiting it was visible VZ wasn’t aiming towards him, he could’ve engage, put one shot in, then try to end the game one way or another
Don’t try blaming the Skorpion, if you both would have attacked at the same time if would have been a surefire win
Thats what i thought and he should of said it not put the blame game on someone eles or himself....bit of a me me there shame .
@@pa5287 Lol, he is all about "me me".
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I got the feeling that QBs allies somehow always end up dead. 😂
Those illogical bounces, the bane of WOT. Highly entertaining battle!
With all the trouble WoT goes to calculate pen, then throws 25% RNG in there??? Why bother, makes no sense. RNG on trajectory and (especially) damage yes, but it should not be on pen.
@@gerryscat RNG should be reduced to 5%
there is a plot armer. RNG balances you across matches…
@@HolyNorthAmericanEmpire Players would still complain about RNG
This game is on you...Dont try to blame others...
A Skorpion is more than potent to take out the vz, if you both engage at the same time, you get taken out, the skorp will miss, then the skorp gets a round and has roughly 20 second to secure the winning shot
Correct play would have been to get on VZ's back and see if he turns his turret to you or keeps it towards Scorpion. If he still keeps Scorp at gun sight, you can shoot him from the back. If he turns to react to you Scorp can shoot him. This was the worst tactic that you chose. You did the worst thing that number advantage can give....which is: go 1 by 1.
QB every vid, "TANK FOR ME"
Looks like Quacky Babs got absolutely bamboozled
I don't think I've ever seen a VZ. 55 using the single shot gun before, though. That's so weird.
Thats like the kv2 not using the 152mm
absolutely
it starts with the single shot as standard, so this guy was probably just grinding
You need about 60k exp to get that gun. But I also like single shot gun. 500 damage every 10s it's nice
i see more of those vz tanks than autoloader ones but just slightly
Great performance QB, especially in that tank, but personally i think that with so much rof You had, You should destroy that small building which he was hiding behind to put even more preasure on him. Then he had two choices, hiding his back from You (and the traverse of that tank on sand is not very good), or charge the Skorpion, which gives both of you the chance to shot first, in Your case, fire twice. Of course, as many times in this battle, the RNG could just say no, and bon voyage no matter what :D
My thoughts exactly. He wasn't gonna need those HE rounds anyway and it takes literally less than 5 seconds to fire 2 shells and destroy the entirety of that little building. That way he's got the VZ's side who's also under immense pressure from being shot at by two tanks now rather than only one.
enemy: Gold round. QB: High explosive anti-tank round
when he shoots the gold he highlights it is high explosve ANti Tank shell ,but when enemy is shooting gold he higlighits it as gold round XD
You cant blame other players for not playing as you would or as you would have liked.
You should have thought about this and taken that into consideration in your descion in how to approach. Players very seldom play as you would have.
Your responsibility is your tank.
awesome game and interesting tank but you don't really need to tank the shot if you can just approach the tank from 2 sides
Asking a stranger to tank (die) for you so you can be the hero is so QB. Love ya, dude, but it's plays like this that really demonstrate your self-centeredness when gaming. Rather fitting that your advice here was poor and caused the team to lose. In this instance, you were the goat, not the GOAT. As always, thanks for sharing.
Hang on, QB wants everyone on his team to act as meat shields in every game… 😬
no he said that for the sake of winning
Well if they aren't getting >5k damage like him they might as well become meat shields
just because he is treating teammates as 50iq players and doesn't trust them at all, even tho Scorpion did very well securing 2 kills just before that, but no, QB thinks ONLY he can do it.
@@tomaszp1190 it’s an interesting aspect of humans that they can be nominally bright but still mill around like confused sheep. Or like, QB be able to react quickly to situational changes 🤔
In Germany we say "Hätte hätte, Fahrradkette" ... and i think that sounds wonderful :)
Rate of Fire over Accuracy? What's the point in firing faster if you can't hit the target?
Vz protected by RNG.
He hits pixelshoots but u miss or bounce 100% pens. Thats what i often feel by single enemies.
you had to go out and shoot immediately after vz fired at the scorpion, it didn't matter what cannon he had, even if it was a reload cannon or not ... he would probably kill you and scorpion would kill vz .... but you wanted to you kill him on the vz, to show how much you are the hero of the fight ... shame on you ,QB.
roman?)
idk how , but the rng that the czech heavies have when i play against them is crazy , like a vz55 sniping my cupola in a kranvagn , twice with the autolaoader in a row. and their armor is really troll sometimes
Btw the skorp stress fired right after the vz and missed or bounced so there was no win anymore.
That VZ player using the single shot gun was a real master-bater…
1. Missed shots on Vz essentially rng- can't control that every time. 2. Missed ID on Tank didn't have enough info- fog of war 3. time short and draws are losses- happens 4. expecting anyone on your team to act in your favor- you're crazy. 5. harshing on skorp- bad example to set.
Quickybaby the scorp fired. You missed that even after watching the replay at least x2? Or refuse to recognize. After he fired 1 the push should of been on reguardless he was a 2 shot for you, a 1 shot for the skorp. Had the vz turned to you scorp would of had him, if he didnt you would of had him....Scorp could of played it 2 ways & either was the right play for him there.
Also if it was even the autoloader you would of had 1 clean reload for the take down but being heat you could of been relying on your 2nd reload which would of been close with the autoloader.
well I wouldn't have know what you meant by 'tank for me' and I'm an English speaker and have been playing this game for 8 years - you could have said something like 'just rush him and I will follow'
You demonstrated how to miss faster by swapping accuracy for RoF. DPM is worthless with out accuracy. You do more damage with 3 penetration hits vs. 5 shots that miss or bounce. Some vehicles have great accuracy so yeah pump that DPM, but for most tanks it is a bit too much of a trade.
My thoughts exactly. Also think about how often you are utilizing the full dpm of your tank VS how often you use the additional accuracy. You always need accuracy, but rarely do you use your full dpm
You gain 1/3 of a gun rammer and lose a whole aiming device with the field mod QB was talking about. Hence why the 122 tm is so competitive, it doesnt have dpm, but it hits every shot. I agree that is not a good choice
in agreement with the other person, DPM can only be utilised in so many ways, and with as low alpha as 320 like most russian mediums have, you can afford to lose a bit of DPM but in turn you can gain a bit more accuracy which in one way is more effective because said tank already has enough DPM
@@adambalogh7239 sorry but 122TM's dreadful ~1400 BASE DPM is a really bad joke... I know the gun's hard stats are like tier 10 gun level, but in these 3-minute 4-15 games day and age, it's such a painful experience to carry in that vehicle.
And about the accuracy part: when a lot of shots go literally at the extremities of the aiming circle, 5% accuracy is not going to work regardless. People miss fully aimed shots in their Leopard 1 like there's no tomorrow, and that tank is supposed to be accurate. Accuracy began to matter way less once they changed the distribution of the shots in the aiming reticle years ago. That's why I'm not even bothering with bonuses like -0.01/0.02 to my accuracy... Just my two cents.
@@thunder7135 I have by far the best t8 stats in that vehicle, it may not be the most fun, but it is certainly very competitive.
You literally lost the game cause you hesitated a lot, you could have just rushed shot one vz would have turned and the skorp will finish the vz.
No, sorry QB, your assessment at the end makes no sense to me. why tank any shot at all? for me the situation looked like an safe kill, but u both managed to screw it up good.
a tank can only aim in one direction at a time, so if you approached the Vz from the opposite direction he would be left with only the option which player he gives the free kill by facing towards the other. By deciding to stay out of range you made the Vz focus on the scorpion and scorpion was not willing to wait for you get into a free shot position (u had time and wasn't spotted)... then again u weren't indicating to do anything other then a greedy play to get the kill, if he tanks for you. still, scrop played as if you weren't there.
so for me this just looks like a misplay. i think you just outsmarted yourself focusing too much on one possible approach to handle this rather then the classic most obvious one. Though true, in time of zerg rushes hardly anyone considers a play that takes a little time and patience, and it's risky if one cannot rule out the random ally risking something stupid and dying.
Aslain's Modpack has a handy info overlay where you can see the reload times. I always use that fair policy mod (according to WG's official mod page) to get a fair advantage and know which guns my enemies are using so I can adjust my play style accordingly :D
That mod still doesn't seem fair.
@@GrinFlash007 WG gave it the stamp of approval.
@@GrinFlash007 wg should ban that mod
Why not just circle around the Vz 55 outside of 50m? Could have come up behind them and gotten a shot, while his turret was facing the skorpion.
What about the other way around QB? What if u tanked one shot, maybe even damaging VZ who knows, and then VZ couldnt not kill Scorpion with autoloader, so Scorpion could kill him with only taking one shot? VZ was on one shot for Scorpion...
uh no the skorp would most likely lose if QB had gone first and died
@@jacobrice8849 Haha, you'd say anything to defend qb.. He's built quite a cult around him.
QB huge missplay in the end... I think you became more of a general than player and overthinked that situation.. Correct play would be to no faf around just go in hit VZ once and then he couldn't do aynthing.. The way you played it was literally the worst you could have done :D It doesn't matter if he use single or double shot gun .. just saying
Fucks up a play because he didn't know the Vz was using the cyclic gun. Blames the Skorp G instead.
It was you fault QB dont blame the other guy for doing what you told him.
You could've gone around the buildings on the right and shot him twice before he turned his turret around.
This battle also shows that 'accuracy' isn't a reliable stat, its wishful thinking.
Maybe the Skorpion wasnt aware of the Vz using the single shot gun. But still, you should have pressured the Vz by flanking, getting to the opposite side so his hands would be forced. Anyway, it's easy to be smart now..
QB well played till the end. VZ has 2 sec intraclip and you were sandwiching him from front and behind. if you just suddenly came up and shot him in the ass vz would either let you live (in which case you get 2 shots and win) or turn around to shoot you (in which case the skorp will kill him and win). it was you who should've tanked the shot or gotten in first considering your alpha
did u even watch the video*
@@paveantelic7876 yes thats why im commenting this. tf?
@@yurackjung9321 tf? then youd know it doesnt have a 2 sec intra clip? tf?
@@nice3297 vz 55 have 2 sec intraclip reload
@@yurackjung9321 again, you didn't watch the video. Tf?
Regardless of who made mistakes at the end, its hard to ignore the amount of shots that didn't pen the Vz that should have... if only one of those hits pen'd, the game would have been won. Damn rng.
Imagine not playing WOTB jk I have enjoyed your videos for years (:
Hi Droodles
lol, I've wished to see QB try the game modes of WotB. he just doesn't want to do more wot than he is already doing.
Hi
@Federal Bureau of Investigation how is it a rip off if made by the same developers
Droodles didn’t know you watched an too. I play blitz too
QB, using his friendly tanks as enemy fodder, as usual.
This is the channel where I learned that screwing your teammates was the way to get your score up
i think you would win if you just rushed the VZ at the end, it’s a 2 v 1 instead of waiting
2:13 ah yes, the k-91 is such an accurate *light* tank
A rare genshin player in a wot video comment
@@shamsielshahar120 i quit genshin a year ago 😂
Rng loves this vz55
You should have showed to blocked damage of that vz55 btw ☺️
Quickie, you should have pressed into the cap and closed together. You could've put in one shot, diverting the enemy's attention, but allowing the Skorpion to get the kill. You may have been destroyed, but would've been victorious for your team.
I don't want to brag, but I guessed the VZ had the single shooter from the first shot. He moves to cover immediately after shooting the first shot, instead of waiting if he could shoot a second time.
After watching this video, I suddenly figured out why I have been enjoying Jingles' wot replays much more than QB's all these years: Jingles plays "normally" as most of us do, focusing more about his own performance than bossing teammates around, and acknowledging mistakes when he makes one.
QB is of course a very good player, but honestly he often thinks himself too highly. And even attempting to shift blame on the Skorpion? He has just gone a bit too far I'm afraid.
I love how he calls gold round gold round when enemy uses it, but when he uses it it's high explosive anti tank round. I like QB but he's a hypocrite as fuck xd
Rules for theee but not for me
He can't be too negative about this game because he knows he's only got another few years max to milk it before the company finally kills the game and he's left grasping for a new game to stream/promote for viewers. He's always pulling his criticism of new tanks and mechanics when you can tell he truly hates them 😂😂
This is one of the most accurate LIGHT Tanks: Quote of the year.
actually great game for all 3 final players. skorpion payed well, tried his best- probably also got confused by non-autoloading enemy. actually qb sacrificing for him to get the kill could be also good- generally speaking you tried to "ambush" skoda instead of overwhelming him by simultaneously attacking... did not play out good, but it was impossible to tell beforehand.
Very high class play i would love to be able to do one day ;)
cheers :)
Sorry QB, but you shouldn't wait. You should look for a shot on him from behind, while he was focused on Scorpion. If he would turn towards you scorp. Could finish him and you are fast enough to run into cover. This was on you buddy.
My heart was just crushed at the outcome of that battle… 💔
The VZ. 55 is QB’s new arch nemesis
2:12 light tank?
There's that Jingles on his head
Skorpion's point of view: "wtf is wrong with this muppet? He wants me to suicide for him so he can get another kill... seriously?"
scorp did not do what u needed him to do? he tanked it as u asked and u were watching how he is dying one more reason to not tank for anyone
Kinda interesting to see this tank in wot pc, im a wot blitz player, and the K-91 over there is a lot different from here. First of all, the turret is mounted at the middle of the tank, and it is a heavy tank, with a 3 shell autoloader. Its pretty strong too.
2:11 "Light tank" lol
It's good to know that even the best can make mistakes. Would almost ask that any three-game video include at least one losing match and why you believe you lost.
He still blamed the Skorp, even though he could've pushed the VZ from behind and let them finish him off. Take his analysis with a grain of salt.
mentioning leopard in the beginning was uncalled for, it would do a better job than k91 in pretty much everything from the video.. regardless, great video!
1:50 Look at that sand, it's so sparkly and shiny
Exciting battle and video. Demonstrating what would happen if player hesitates in the battle, even for QB.
This game is getting so much more complicated (and suffering) than I used to play before, with so many meta tanks and the good-old-F RNG......
Keep up the great work! Happy holidays!
12:11 Story of my later tanking career and why I've taken over a year break now.
The game has told me, "NO! Sit there and take L. You're not allowed to beat this player in particular." so often that I'm just done.
That's just not fair. Granting opposing players immunity from me while they are granted every shot possible on me.
I've been using the tactical zoom out view a lot to see more detail around me that you couldn't really see before, such as fences and trees being knocked down far away or teammates getting tracked.
yeah quite contrary, like most are saying here, I think the better play might've been to be more aggressive and you actually be the one to tank the shot and create pressure. the scorp then would've had the HP to finish him off. whether the Vz had the autoloader or not.
I like tanks with rear mounted turrets, they're great for side-scraping. And this one is probably the coolest.
Thank you QuickyBaby 😂😂
Little fucup at the end :) haha Scorpion is hero of the game.
So, tank for me means take the hit for me. Crap choice of words.
If wot is basketball, QB would be Russ
Sry QB, but you should have been the one to tank….. coming in one at a time is lesson 1 in how not to play the game. Appreciating that you both were under a lot of pressure, the fact that the Skorpion was was understanding and following your advice should have been sufficient to trust him to pincer with you. Sun Tsu… never underestimate others, it will be your downfall.
Its also funny to watch people rush my E100, not expecting me to use 128mm gun and pack over 3000 dpm and simply melt them.
I like how everybody is talking shit but he literally says at the end of the video he should've put more faith in the skorp and just rushed together. 😂
Yes! your expectations are correct. War Thunder Is a much better, and more realistic tank game. Than the kindergarten world of tanks.
Aaah yes the K91
The most accurate light tank in WoT
You are just overthinking it
Yeah, no way QB, you miffed it when you saw the shot on the skorpion yet you didn't push right then
My k-91 reloads in 4.24s under adrenaline rush. Pure insanity
I said this on stream, if you would both go in you would win this 99 out of 100 times. No matter does he has autoreloader or standard gun. As you see he needed 3 shots to kill you both, you needed 1 Skorpion shot or 2 yours. If you would go first and even die Skorpion would have time and alpha to kill him, even if Skorp take one shoot. All you needed to do is to help Skorpion do that one shot. But it wouldnt look so good... Actually im supprised you made this video... And also - "tank for me" it is not obvious for non-english person, i never heard it. So bad comunication and bad play in the end of awsome battle.
i would have not trust the skorp to kill the VZ at all imo
@@jacobrice8849 could be, but that is the 1 out of 100 case, as ammorack, or fast reload in vz to HE. QB stayed hidden and forgot about important thing - confiusion. VZ focused Skorp and did what he should. I don't blame QB because in battle even he make bad decisisons, but i cant stand he belive that Skorp should go and die for him so QB can kill last enemy, win battle and take fame and glory for himself.
@@Xard86 i don’t think he cares ab the fame and glory or who kills who tbh i think he just wanted to win the game as simple as that
No, QB. You needed to put your pride aside and tank for that Scorpion. With the Scorpion able to take the VZ down with one shot you needed to create an opening for them.
Well, QB, you were a bit Yellow Belly .....!!!!
i think the most logical play would have been to just drive up to his ass and put a round in him and if he turns go behind the buildings so that scorp could just shoot him in the side.. 2v1 is the easiest thing to win when u go n at the same time
Yeah, he's blaming the Skorp in the end. No surprise there. Ok, the single shot gun took you both by surprise.. so what? Big deal.. But no, you had to pin it on the Skorp who did a great job btw.
Have to disagree with you here QB. Just like all the other comments are saying, you could have at least gotten closer while keeping buildings between you and the VZ. In other words, you could have gotten so much closer without actually being in much danger. Then, you could have shot the VZ twice before he reloaded.
Yes, this "pancake" tank can definitely work :D
should have pushed in when that VZ had fired the first shot, no matter which gun he is using. if that had been an auto-loader, the skorpion could still have two attempts to one-shot the heavy tank (not really easy for the VZ to out-manoeuvre the skorpion provided with the buildings around that can slow its speed, plus the fact that VZ had to turn around to engage you); if that had been a single firing gun, you both could have gotten some window between the reload. The skorpion demonstrated his capabilities as, at least, a decent player by shutting down the enemy su130pm and emil without losing too many hit points.
That moment when you see the muzzle break on the VZ and know you fucked up :p
The winning play would have been for QB to “tank” and sacrifice himself for the Skorp to finish him off. Yet that never enters QB’s mind…..