The Itemizer Adding Machine Review / HowTo

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @JoannaFalkowska
    @JoannaFalkowska 2 роки тому +25

    Phew, finally someone who Knows Women reviews a product For Women. I hate it when Women amateurs try to share their opinions that aren't based on any real knowledge, but from your review here it's clear you're a true expert. Thanks to people like you Women can finally know which products are suitable for them, thank you!

    • @stumbling
      @stumbling 2 роки тому +1

      He "Knows Women"

  • @samisiddiqi5411
    @samisiddiqi5411 4 роки тому +42

    "Here's a giant adding machine being used by a ghost"
    Lol this channel is criminally underrated and funny. The editing and all these little jokes. I predict that it may take off.

  • @hendrikd2113
    @hendrikd2113 2 роки тому +43

    "Three digits will be plenty." - Bill Gates 1981

  • @willd4686
    @willd4686 2 роки тому +6

    Love the music and the way you say ORIGINAL

  • @Xyabra
    @Xyabra 2 роки тому +3

    Imagine this guy and his video being on the History Channel.
    No one would suspect a thing.
    Educational and humor...
    smells like a great way for kids in school to learn about things that are relevant now like baking.
    Why bake when a microwave does the job in
    *beep bop*
    132 seconds.

    • @ChrisStaecker
      @ChrisStaecker  2 роки тому

      History Channel hmu

    • @Xyabra
      @Xyabra 2 роки тому

      I put a stars between beep and bop and it became bolded but I didn't know that until I read my comment.
      Come on UA-cam, just add the entire word tab so I can add the money font.
      * = *bolded font*
      Me = Learned something new

    • @someonespadre
      @someonespadre 2 роки тому

      Whenever an old calculating device shows up on Pawn Stars we know who Rick is going to call for advice.

  • @farpointgamingdirect
    @farpointgamingdirect 2 роки тому +3

    We need to get you on The Learning Channel! It could be the renaissance that gives the axe to those dammed "reality" shows!

  • @Xyabra
    @Xyabra 2 роки тому +8

    Chris has the in depth story tell like the
    Angry Video Game Nerd
    and dumb quick humor of
    Scott the Woz
    and the old unusual toys of
    Grand Illusion.
    All a recipe made with Chemical X
    to make great videos.

    • @Xyabra
      @Xyabra 2 роки тому

      Also is an expert like the
      Lockpicking Lawyer

    • @Xyabra
      @Xyabra 2 роки тому

      On top of all the other video creators or "UA-camrs" that I mentioned...
      add
      Doug Demuro into the list.
      Reminds me of his early videos where he shows unusual cars with the undescribable nerdy charm that like saying "hey I'm cool because I know something that one else does and I don't care if no one sees the appeal"
      while rocking rollerblades unironically.

  • @ChurchOfThought
    @ChurchOfThought 6 років тому +14

    being used by a ghost..lmao

  • @someonestolemyname
    @someonestolemyname 2 роки тому +2

    The troncet type seems more practical to me, maybe even more so if you add a retainer bar that can prevent the slider from moving when you jostle it in your pocket or bag

    • @ChrisStaecker
      @ChrisStaecker  2 роки тому

      Yes- an addiator is much smaller and the sliders would never move on their own unless you used the stylus. No wrist strap though!

  • @MattMcIrvin
    @MattMcIrvin 11 місяців тому

    I suppose this was an era when you could do some significant shopping and not buy any item that cost over a dollar.
    But the plastic supermarket clickers already existed in those days, right? Very limited, but you could use them in one hand. I remember them being very common in the 1970s.
    The package design actually reminds me of Apple.

  • @RossMarsden
    @RossMarsden 2 роки тому +2

    I like your theme. Reminds me of Breaking Bad.
    You are bad ... because of the way you say "bones".
    Subscribed.

  • @StephenRansom47
    @StephenRansom47 Рік тому

    My Man …
    … package design 😊
    That’s the Jam on my Toast.
    also the box is very APPLE 🤔 wait a second… take that flip it around. 🎩

  • @ro_yo_mi
    @ro_yo_mi 2 роки тому

    Comedy gold right here!!🤣

  • @coasterairtime
    @coasterairtime 2 роки тому +2

    All those adding machines.... I'm wondering why there were so many. After all manual addition with pen and paper is not that hard, even multiplication is not. Am I too naive? It takes maybe a week to get the hang of it if you really didn't learn it in school, right? For larger numbers I see a point, it is just easier not to have to think, but for numbers

    • @JohnDoe-rx3vn
      @JohnDoe-rx3vn 2 роки тому +9

      Necessity is the mother of invention, but laziness is the cool aunt

    • @TaramiBedona
      @TaramiBedona 2 роки тому +3

      Imagine you have to add up sixty-four numbers to a total, and it starts to make sense. Doing it pairwise it's 32+16+8+4+2+1 = 63 operations to reduce it to one number, less if you do more than two at a time, but substantially more mentally taxing because the lookup you need to keep in your head gets larger. Just the writing becomes significant work and is error-prone.
      Doing more numbers at a time, let's say four numbers, is theoretically a four-dimensional problem because while 3+4+2+1 is equal to 1+2+3+4, the difference in order requires you to either sort them in your head or keep both sequences memorized. Chances are most people do them as 3+4 then 2+1 then 7+3 any way (or a running total), just keeping the tally in their head. Fine if you're splitting the check at a restaurant, but significant work if you're doing 3M's accounts. A running total over long sequences of numbers has the issue that it's very easy to introduce errors because you're doing hundreds of interdependent additions without intermediate checks. One column can sum to hundreds with multiple simultaneous carries. It's all very doable, but for how long can you keep it up without making an error?
      With an adding machine, it's just a matter of entering the numbers once each and you'll have your answer. No computing errors, no intermediate sums to keep track of and input/writing errors are kept to an absolute minimum.

    • @hendrikd2113
      @hendrikd2113 2 роки тому +2

      After a couple of hours of adding your brain gets really tired. Just ask a cashier (working without a calculator).
      But yes, this thing is crab.

  • @andracatheduckking257
    @andracatheduckking257 4 роки тому +1

    sounds like a fallout gun

  • @emreturkmen2389
    @emreturkmen2389 2 роки тому +1

    The volatile cup bareilly slap because fibre hooghly obtain worth a tasteless shadow. complete, warm postbox

  • @johnsrabe
    @johnsrabe 2 роки тому +1

    This may be the dumbest invention. Besides the avocado.