It's pretty hard to argue against Proxmox as the base for your lab. Anything from MS should only be run isolated in a VM with very tight permission controls.
In all my years of doing homelan (even before people were calling it homelan) i have nevwr run into anyone using Hyper-V in a home lab. Proxmox ir XCP-NG (XenServer before that). CentOS is effectively dead as a community OS and has been replaced by Rocky and Alma. Microsoft recently announced WSUS is a dead end. They are winding down development. Interesting video. Ive gone the route of no Microsoft Servers, and Windows only in VMs where i have more control.
i have been using proxmox for 2 years now, and i dont see anything that i could replace it with, to me hyper-v consum to much resource... unless you have 64Go or more and a big cpu, it's not worth it, proxmox can run on a 16go and an i5 pretty fine
It's pretty hard to argue against Proxmox as the base for your lab. Anything from MS should only be run isolated in a VM with very tight permission controls.
In all my years of doing homelan (even before people were calling it homelan) i have nevwr run into anyone using Hyper-V in a home lab. Proxmox ir XCP-NG (XenServer before that).
CentOS is effectively dead as a community OS and has been replaced by Rocky and Alma.
Microsoft recently announced WSUS is a dead end. They are winding down development.
Interesting video. Ive gone the route of no Microsoft Servers, and Windows only in VMs where i have more control.
i have been using proxmox for 2 years now, and i dont see anything that i could replace it with,
to me hyper-v consum to much resource... unless you have 64Go or more and a big cpu, it's not worth it, proxmox can run on a 16go and an i5 pretty fine
EMILIO!!!!